Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures and Diagrams
- Tables
- Maps
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction: Linguistic Typology – Setting the Scene
- Part I Domains of Linguistic Typology
- Part II Typology of Grammatical Categories
- Part III Typological Profiles of Linguistic Areas and Language Families
- 19 Language in the Mainland Southeast Asia Area
- 20 The Australian Linguistic Area
- 21 A Typological Overview of Aymaran and Quechuan Language Structure
- 22 The Eskimo-Aleut Language Family
- 23 The Athabaskan (Dene) Language Family
- 24 The Iroquoian Language Family
- 25 The Kampa Subgroup of the Arawak Language Family
- 26 The Omotic Language Family
- 27 The Semitic Language Family
- 28 The Dravidian Language Family
- 29 The Oceanic Subgroup of the Austronesian Language Family
- 30 Greater Awyu Languages of West Papua in Typological Perspective
- Index of Authors
- Index of Languages, Language Families and Linguistic Areas
- Index of Subjects
- References
22 - The Eskimo-Aleut Language Family
from Part III - Typological Profiles of Linguistic Areas and Language Families
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 April 2017
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures and Diagrams
- Tables
- Maps
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction: Linguistic Typology – Setting the Scene
- Part I Domains of Linguistic Typology
- Part II Typology of Grammatical Categories
- Part III Typological Profiles of Linguistic Areas and Language Families
- 19 Language in the Mainland Southeast Asia Area
- 20 The Australian Linguistic Area
- 21 A Typological Overview of Aymaran and Quechuan Language Structure
- 22 The Eskimo-Aleut Language Family
- 23 The Athabaskan (Dene) Language Family
- 24 The Iroquoian Language Family
- 25 The Kampa Subgroup of the Arawak Language Family
- 26 The Omotic Language Family
- 27 The Semitic Language Family
- 28 The Dravidian Language Family
- 29 The Oceanic Subgroup of the Austronesian Language Family
- 30 Greater Awyu Languages of West Papua in Typological Perspective
- Index of Authors
- Index of Languages, Language Families and Linguistic Areas
- Index of Subjects
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology , pp. 683 - 706Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Baker, M. C. 1996. The polysynthesis parameter. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergsland, K. 1989. Comparative aspects of Aleut syntax. Aikakauskirja Journal de la Societe Finno-ougrienne 82: 7–80.Google Scholar
Bergsland, K. 1997. Aleut grammar. Alaska Native Language Center, Research paper no. 10, University of Alaska, Fairbanks.Google Scholar
Boas, F. 1911. Handbook of American Indian languages. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Dorais, L.-J. 1990. Inuit Uqausiqatigiit, Inuit languages and dialects. Iqaluit: Arctic College, Nunatta Campus.Google Scholar
Fortescue, M. 1991. Switch reference anomalies and ‘topic’ in West Greenlandic: A case of pragmatics over syntax. In Verschueren, J. (ed.), Levels of linguistic Adaptation: Selected papers of the International Pragmatics Conference, Antwerp, August 17–22, 1987, Vol. II, pp. 53–80. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fortescue, M. 1992. Morphophonemic complexity and typological stability in a polysynthetic language family. International Journal of American Linguistics 58(2): 242–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortescue, M. 1994. The role of typology in the establishment of the genetic relationship between Eskimo and Aleut and beyond. In Miyaoka, O. (ed.), Languages of the North Pacific Rim, Vol. I, pp. 9–36. University of Hokkaido, Sapporo.Google Scholar
Fortescue, M. 1995. The historical source and typological position of ergativity in Eskimo languages. Etudes/Inuit/Studies 19(2): 61–75.Google Scholar
Fortescue, M. 2003. Evidentiality in West Greenlandic: A case of scattered coding. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), Studies in evidentiality, pp. 291–306. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fortescue, M. 2016. The semantic domain of emotion in Eskimo and neighbouring languages: polysemy, shift, and cognitive motivation. In Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M. and Juvanen, P. (eds.), Lexico-typological approaches to semantic shifts and motivation patterns in the lexicon, pp. 285–333. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. 1960. A quantitative approach to the morphological typology of languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 26: 178–94.Google Scholar
Humboldt, W.. 1836. Uber die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaue. Berlin: Koniglichen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Jacobson, S. A. 1995. A practical grammar of the Central Alaskan Yup’ik Eskimo language. Alaska Native Language Center, University of Alaska, Fairbanks.Google Scholar
Kleinschmidt, S. 1851. Grammatik der grönländischen Sprache. Berlin. Reprinted Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag Buchhandlung, 1968.Google Scholar
Krauss, M. E. 1976. Eskimo-Aleut. In Sebeok, T. A. (ed.), Native languages of the Americas, pp. 175–281. New York and London: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krauss, M. E. 2007. Native languages of Alaska. In Miyaoka, O., Sakiyama, O. and Krauss, M. E. (eds.), The vanishing languages of the Pacific Rim, pp. 406–17. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leer, J. 1991. Evidence for a northern northwest coast language area: Promiscuous number marking and periphrastic possessive constructions in Hayda, Eyak and Aleut. International Journal of American Linguistics 57(2): 158–93.Google Scholar
Lynge, K. 1978. kalâtdlit oKalugtuait oKalualâvilo. Godthaab: Det groenlandske Forlag.Google Scholar
Mattissen, J. 2003. Dependent-head Synthesis in Nivkh. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mithun, M. 2009. Polysynthesis in the Arctic. In Mahieu, M.-A. and Tersis, N. (eds.), Variations on Polysynthesis, pp. 3–17. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Miyaoka, O. 2012. A grammar of Central Alaskan Yupik (CAY). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
de Reuse, W. J. 1994. Siberian Yupik Eskimo. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
Sadock, J. 1980. Noun incorporation in Greenlandic: A case of syntactic word formation. Language 56(2): 300–19.Google Scholar
Sapir, E. 1911. The problem of noun incorporation in American languages. American Anthropologist 13: 250–82. Reprinted in The Collected Works of Edward Sapir, ed. Bright, W., Vol. V, pp. 27–59. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1990.Google Scholar
Trask, R. L. 1979. On the origins of ergativity. In Plank, F. (ed.), Ergativity: Towards a theory of grammatical relations, pp. 385–404. London and New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Woodbury, A. 2002. The word in Cup’ik. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (eds.), Word: A cross-linguistic typology, pp. 79–99. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar