Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T03:58:22.993Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Coding Interaction

A Technical Introduction

from Part III - Methodology and Procedures of Interaction Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2018

By
Elisabeth Brauner
Edited by
Elisabeth Brauner ,
Margarete Boos  and
Michaela Kolbe
Elisabeth Brauner
Affiliation:
Brooklyn College, City University of New York
Margarete Boos
Affiliation:
University of Göttingen
Michaela Kolbe
Affiliation:
ETH Zürich
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Group Interaction Analysis , pp. 165 - 190
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arrow, H., McGrath, J. E., & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). Small groups as complex systems: Formation, coordination, development, and adaptation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, R. (Ed.) (1976). Structure of decision. The cognitive maps of political elites. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis (2nd edn.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakeman, R., & Quera, V. (1995). Analyzing interaction: Sequential analysis with SDIS and GSEQ. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Bales, R. F., & Cohen, S. P. (1979). SYMLOG: A system for the multiple level observation of groups. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York, NY: Ballantine.Google Scholar
Beck, D., & Orth, B. (1995). Wer wendet sich an wen? – Muster in der Interaktion kooperierender Kleingruppen [Who addresses whom? Interaction patterns in cooperating small groups]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 26, 92–106.Google Scholar
Belar, C. D., & Perry, N. W. (1992). The National Conference on Scientist-Practitioner education and training for the professional practice of psychology. American Psychologist, 47(1), 71–75. Retrieved February 22, 2016, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.47.1.71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Berra, Y. (with Kaplan, D. H.) (2003). What time is it? You mean now? Advice for life from the Zennest Master of them all. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Berra, Y. (with Kaplan, D. H.) (2008). You can observe a lot by watching. What I’ve learned about teamwork from the Yankees and life. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Black, M. P., Katsamanis, A., Baucom, B. R., Lee, C-C., Lammert, A. C., Christensen, A., … Narayanan, S. S. (2013). Toward automating a human behavioral coding system for married couples’ interactions using speech acoustic features. Speech Communication, 55, 1–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2011.12.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonito, J. A., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1997). Participation in small groups. In Burleson, B. R. (Ed.), Communication yearbook 20 (pp. 227–261). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Brauner, E. (1998). Die Qual der Wahl am Methodenbuffet—oder: Wie der Gegenstand nach der passenden Methode sucht [Tough choices at the methods buffet—or: How a construct is searching for the appropriate method]. In Ardelt, E., Lechner, H., & Schloegl, W. (Eds.), Neue Gruppendynamik. Theorie und Praxis, Anspruch und Wirklichkeit [New Group dynamics. Theory and practice, desiderata and reality] (S. 176–193). Göttingen, Germany: Verlag für Angewandte Psychologie.Google Scholar
Brauner, E., & Orth, B. (2002). Strukturen von Argumentationssequenzen in Gruppen [Structures of sequences of argumentation in groups]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 33, 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1024//0044-3514.33.2.65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bühler, K. (1934/1982). Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. [Language theory: The representative function of language]. Stuttgart, Germany: Fischer.Google Scholar
Burgoon, J. K., & Baesler, E. J. (1991). Choosing between micro and macro nonverbal measurement: Application to selected vocalic and kinesic indices. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 15, 57–78. doi:10.1007/BF00997767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, A., Kessler, D., Mackinnon, R., Chang, T. P., Nadkarni, V. M., Hunt, E. A., … Auerbach, M. (2016). Reporting guidelines for health care simulation research: Extensions to the CONSORT and STROBE statements. BMJ Simulation and Technology Enhanced Learning, 2(3), 51–60. doi:10.1136/bmjstel-2016-000124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cicourel, A. V. (1985). Text and discourse. Annual Review of Anthropology, 14, 159–185. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.14.100185.001111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cicourel, A. V. (1987). The interpretation of communicative contexts: Examples from medical encounters. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(2), 217–226. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2786753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cicourel, A. V. (1985). Text and discourse. Annual Review of Anthropology, 14, 159–185. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.14.100185.001111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M., & Teasley, S. D. (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127–149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coan, J. A., & Gottman, J. M. (2007). The specific affect coding system (SPAFF). In Coan, J. A. & Allen, J. J. B. (Eds.), Handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment (pp. 106–123). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duck, S., & Montgomery, B. M. (1991). The interdependence among interaction substance, theory, and methods. In Montgomery, B. M. & Duck, S. (Eds.), Studying interpersonal interaction (pp. 3–15). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
Eden, C. (2004). Analyzing cognitive maps to help structure issues or problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 159, 673–686. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00431-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmondson, A. C., & McManus, S. E. (2007). Methodological fit in management field research. The Academy of Management Review, 32, 1155–1179. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.26586086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. (1978). The facial action coding system. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Faßnacht, G. (1982). Theory and practice of observing behavior (C. Bryant, Trans.). London, UK: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. New York, NY: Harper.Google Scholar
Grice, P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Heatherington, L., & Friedlander, M. L. (2004). From dyads to triads, and beyond: Relational control in individual and family therapy. In Rogers, L. E. & Escudero, V. (Eds.), Relational communication: An interactional perspective to the study of process and form (pp. 103–129). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Heine, S. J. (2011). Cultural psychology (2nd Ed.). New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
Hewes, D. E. (1979). The sequential analysis of social interaction. The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 65, 56–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00335637909383458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 39–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolbe, M., Strack, M., Stein, A., & Boos, M. (2011). Effective coordination in human group decision making: MICRO-CO: A micro-analytical taxonomy for analysing explicit coordination mechanisms in decision-making groups. In Boos, M., Kolbe, M., Kappeler, P. M., & Ellwart, T. (Eds.), Coordination in human and primate groups (pp. 199–219). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krauss, R. M. (1987). The role of the listener: Addressee influences on message formulation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 6, 81–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0261927X8700600201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd edn.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Laing, R. D., Phillipson, H., & Lee, A. R. (1966). Interpersonal perception. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Lewin, K. (1969). Grundzuege der topologischen Psychologie [Principles of topological psychology]. Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
Lindahl, K. M. (2009). Coding systems for observing interaction. In Reis, H. T. & Sprecher, S. (Eds.) Encyclopedia of human relationships (pp. 219–222). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Lindahl, K. M., & Malik, N. M. (2000). System for coding interactions and family functioning (SCIFF): A coding system for family problem discussions. Available at http://www.psy.miami.edu/faculty/klindahl/Google Scholar
Maisel, N. C., Gable, S. L., & Strachman, A. (2008). Responsive behaviors in good times and bad. Personal Relationships, 15, 317–338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2008.00201.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
McGrath, J. E., & Altermatt, T. W. (2003). Observation and analysis of group interaction over time: Some methodological and strategic choices. In Hogg, M. A. & Tindale, S. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 525–556). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mead, G. H. (1934/1967). Mind, self, and society. From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McGrath, J. E., & Tschan, F. (2004). Temporal matters in social psychology: Examining the role of time in the lives of groups and individuals. Washington, DC: APA Publications.Google Scholar
Michell, J. (1990). An introduction to the logic of psychological measurement. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Nöth, W. (1995). Handbook of semiotics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Poole, M. S., & Hewes, D. E. (2017). Reliability and validity in the measurement of social interaction. In VanLear, C. A. & Canary, D. J. (Eds.), Researching interactive communication behavior. A sourcebook of methods and measures (pp. 217–233). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. (1960/2013). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Reis, H. T., Clark, M. S., & Holmes, J. G. (2004). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. In Mashek, D. J. & Aron, A. P. (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 201–225). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Salas, E., Paige, J. T., & Rosen, M. A. (2013). Creating new realities in healthcare: the status of simulation-based training as a patient safety improvement strategy. BMJ Quality & Safety, 22(6), 449–452. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002112CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saldana, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
Schober, M. F., & Clark, H. H. (1989). Understanding by addressees and overhearers. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 211–232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(89)90008-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulz von Thun, F. (1981/1994). Miteinander Reden 1. Störungen und Klärungen. Allgemeine Psychologie der Kommunikation [Talking to each other 1. Disruptions and clarifications. General psychology of communication]. Reinbek bei Hamburg, Germany: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
Sillars, A. (1991). Behavioral observation. In Montgomery, B. M. & Duck, S. (Eds.), Studying interpersonal interaction (pp. 197–218). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
Sillars, A. L., & Overall, N. C. (2017). Coding observed interaction. In VanLear, C. A. & Canary, D. J. (Eds.), Researching interactive communication behavior. A sourcebook of methods and measures (pp. 199–215). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, S. S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103, 677–680. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.103.2684.677CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stiles, W. B. (1981). Classification of intersubjective illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 10(2), 227–249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500008654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiles, W. B. (1992). Describing talk: A taxonomy of Verbal Response Modes. Newbury, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Swaab, R. I., Schaerer, M., Anicich, E. M., Ronay, R., & Galinsky, A. D. (2014). The too-much-talent effect: Team interdependence determines when more talent is too much or not enough. Psychological Science, 25(8), 1581–1591. doi:10.1177/0956797614537280CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tannen, D., & Wallat, C. (1987). Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction: Examples from a medical examination/interview. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(2), 205–216. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2786752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2000). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 675–735. doi:10.1017/S0140525X05000129CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trujillo, N. (1986). Toward a taxonomy of small group interaction-coding systems. Small Group Behavior, 17(4), 371–394. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/104649648601700401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tschan, F. (2002). Ideal cycles of communication (or cognitions) in triads, dyads, and individuals. Small Group Research, 33, 615–643. doi:10.1177/1046496402238618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salas, E., Maurino, D., & Curtis, M. (2010). Human factors in aviation: An overview. In Salas, E. & Marino, D. (Eds.), Human factors in aviation (2nd edn., pp. 3–19). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watzlawick, P. & Beavin, J. (1967). Some formal aspects of communication. American Behavioral Scientist, 10(8), 4–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002764201000802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J., & Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication. A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
Weingart, L. R. (1997). How did they do that? The ways and means of studying group processes. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 189–239.Google Scholar
Wilson, N. L. (1959). Substances without substrata. The Review of Metaphysics, 12(4), 521–539.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×