Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-t27h7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-22T15:52:26.295Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Agency and Communion as a Framework to Understand Consumer Behavior

from Part II - Interpersonal and Social Consumer Psychology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2015

By
Didem Kurt  and
Jeremy Frimer
Edited by
Michael I. Norton ,
Derek D. Rucker  and
Cait Lamberton
Michael I. Norton
Affiliation:
Harvard Business School, Harvard University
Derek D. Rucker
Affiliation:
Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University
Cait Lamberton
Affiliation:
Katz Graduate School of Business, University of Pittsburgh
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Consumer Psychology , pp. 446 - 475
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aaker, J. L. (1997). Dimension of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 347–356.Google Scholar
Abele, A. E. (2003). The dynamics of masculine-agentic and feminine-communal traits: Findings from a prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 768–776.Google Scholar
Abele, A. E., & Brack, S. (2013). Preference for other persons’ traits is dependent on the kind of social relationship. Social Psychology, 44, 84–94.Google Scholar
Abele, A. E., & Bruckmüller, S. (2011). The bigger one of the “Big Two”? Preferential processing of communal information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 935–948.Google Scholar
Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 751–763.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (in press). Communal and agentic content in social cognition: A dual perspective model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.Google Scholar
Aggarwal, P. (2004). The effects of brand relationship norms on consumer attitudes and behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 87–101.Google Scholar
Aggarwal, P., & McGill, A. L. (2012). When brands seem human, do humans act like brands? Automatic behavioral priming effects of brand anthropomorphism. Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 307–323.Google Scholar
Anthony, C. I., & Cowley, E. (2012). The labor of lies: How lying for material rewards polarizes outcome satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 478–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Argo, J. J., White, K., & Dahl, D. W. (2006). Social comparison theory and deception in the interpersonal exchange of consumption information. Journal Consumer Research, 33, 99–108.Google Scholar
Argo, J. J., & Shiv, B. (2010). Are white lies as innocuous as we think? Journal of Consumer Research, 38, 1093–1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ariely, D., & Levav, J. (2000). Sequential choice in group settings: Taking the road less traveled and less enjoyed. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 279–290.Google Scholar
Bakan, D. (1966). The Duality of Human Existence: An Essay on Psychology and Religion. Oxford: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Bartz, J. A., & Lydon, J. E. (2004). Close relationships and the working self-concept: Implicit and explicit effects of priming attachment on agency and communion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1389–1401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batson, C. (2008). Moral masquerades: Experimental exploration of the nature of moral motivation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 7, 51–66.Google Scholar
Batson, C., Kobrynowicz, D., Dinnerstein, J. L., Kampf, H. C., & Wilson, A. D. (1997). In a very different voice: Unmasking moral hypocrisy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1335–1348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., & Brewer, L. E. (2012). Believing versus disbelieving in free will: Correlates and consequences. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 736–745.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., Heatherton, T. F., & Tice, D. M. (1994). Losing Control: How and Why People Fail at Self-Regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.Google Scholar
Bi, C., Ybarra, O., & Zhao, Y. (2013). Accentuating your masculine side: Agentic traits generally dominate self-evaluation, even in China. Social Psychology, 44, 103–108.Google Scholar
Bleidorn, W., Kandler, C., Hülsheger, U. R., Riemann, R., Angleitner, A., & Spinath, F. M. (2010). Nature and nurture of the interplay between personality traits and major life goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 366–379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bosak, J., Sczesny, S., & Eagly, A. H. (2012). The impact of social roles on trait judgments: A critical reexamination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 429–440.Google Scholar
Brown, K. W., & Moskowitz, D. S. (1998). Dynamic stability of behavior: The rhythms of our interpersonal lives. Journal of Personality, 66, 105–134.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (1990). Unmitigated agency and unmitigated communion: An analysis of the negative components of masculinity and femininity. Sex Roles, 22, 555–568.Google Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. G. (1997). Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 3–25.Google Scholar
Campbell, M., & Kirmani, A. (2000). Consumers’ use of persuasion knowledge: The effects of accessibility and cognitive capacity on perceptions of an influence agent. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 69–83.Google Scholar
Carrier, A., Louvet, E., Chauvin, B., & Rohmer, O. (2014). The primacy of agency over competence in status perception. Social Psychology, 45, 347–356.Google Scholar
Chandler, J., & Schwarz, N. (2010). Use does not wear ragged the fabric of friendship: Thinking of objects as alive makes people less willing to replace them. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20, 138–145.Google Scholar
Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., Foulsham, T., Kingstone, A., & Henrich, J. (2013). Two ways to the top: Evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 103–125.Google Scholar
Christopher, A. N., & Schlenker, B. R. (2000). The impact of perceived material wealth and perceiver personality on first impressions. Journal of Economic Psychology, 21, 1–19.Google Scholar
Cislak, A. (2013). Effects of power on social perception: All your boss can see is agency. Social Psychology, 44, 138–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cislak, A., & Wojciszke, B. (2008). Agency and communion are inferred from actions serving interests of self or others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1103–1110.Google Scholar
Clarks, M. S., & Mills, J. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12–24.Google Scholar
Coolsen, M. K., & Nelson, L. J. (2001). Desiring and avoiding close romantic attachment in response to mortality salience. Omega: Journal of Death and Dying, 44, 257–276.Google Scholar
Coren, S., & Hewitt, P. L. (1999). Sex differences in elderly suicide rates: Some predictive factors. Aging & Mental Health, 3, 112–118.Google Scholar
Cotte, J. & Ratneshwar, S. (2000). Time style and consuming time: Why we do what we do with our time. In Ratneshwar, S., Mick, D. G., & Huffman, C. (eds.), The Why of Consumption: Contemporary Perspectives on Consumer Motives, Goals, and Desires (pp. 216–236). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Costos, D. (1986). Sex role identity in young adults: its parental antecedents and relation to ego development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 601–611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cuddy, A. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2007). The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 631–648.Google Scholar
Cuddy, A. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. In Zanna, M. P. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (vol. 40, pp. 61–149). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
Danoff-Burg, S., Mosher, C. E., & Grant, C. A. (2006). Relations of agentic and communal personality traits to health behavior and substance use among college students. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 353–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diehl, M., Owen, S. K., & Youngblade, L. M. (2004). Agency and communion attributes in adults’ spontaneous self-representations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 1–15.Google Scholar
Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1171–1188.Google Scholar
Dindia, K. (2006). Men are from North Dakota, women are from South Dakota. In Dindia, K. & Canary, D. J. (eds.), Sex Differences and Similarities in Communication (pp. 3–20). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Dommer, S. L., & Swaminathan, V. (2013). Explaining the endowment effect through ownership: The role of identity, gender, and self-threat. Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 1034–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dréze, X., & Nunes, J. C. (2009). Feeling superior: The impact of loyalty program structure on consumers’ perceptions of status. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 890–905.Google Scholar
Dunlop, W. L., Walker, L. J., & Matsuba, M. (2013). The development of moral motivation across the adult lifespan. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 10, 285–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-Role Interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Escalas, J. E. (1996). Narrative Processing: Building Connections between Brand and the Self. Dissertation, Duke University.Google Scholar
Escalas, J. E., & Bettman, J. R. (2000). Using narratives to discern self-identity related consumer goals and motivations. In Ratneshwar, S., Mick, D. G., & Huffman, C. (eds.), The Why of Consumption: Contemporary Perspectives on Consumer Motives, Goals, and Desires (pp. 237–258). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Evans, F. B. (1963). Selling as a dyadic relationship: A new approach. American Behavioral Scientist, 6, 76–79.Google Scholar
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. C., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 77–83.Google Scholar
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fournier, M. A., & Moskowitz, D. S. (2000). The mitigation of interpersonal behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 827–836.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frimer, J. A., Schaefer, N. K., & Oakes, H. (2014). Moral actor, selfish agent. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 790–802.Google Scholar
Frimer, J. A. & Walker, L. J. (2009). Reconciling the self and morality: An empirical model of moral centrality development. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1669–1681.Google Scholar
Frimer, J. A., Walker, L. J., Dunlop, W. L., Lee, B., & Riches, A. (2011). The integration of agency and communion in moral personality: Evidence of enlightened self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 149–163.Google Scholar
Frimer, J. A., Walker, L. J., Lee, B. H., Riches, A., & Dunlop, W. L. (2012). Hierarchical integration of agency and communion: A study of influential moral figures. Journal of Personality, 80, 1117–1145.Google Scholar
Fritz, H. L., Nagurney, A. J., & Helgeson, V. S. (2003). Social interactions and cardiovascular reactivity during problem disclosure among friends. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 713–725.Google Scholar
Fuchs, C., Prandelli, E., Schreier, M., & Dahl, D. W. (2013). All that is users might not be gold: How labeling products as user designed backfires in the context of luxury fashion brands. Journal of Marketing, 77, 75–91.Google Scholar
Gebauer, J. E., Leary, M. R., & Neberich, W. (2012). Big two personality and big three mate preferences: Similarity attracts, but country-level mate preferences crucially matter. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1579–1593.Google Scholar
Gebauer, J. E., Paulhus, D. L., & Neberich, W. (2013). Big two personality and religiosity across cultures: Communals as religious conformists and agentics as religious contrarians. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 21–30.Google Scholar
Gebauer, J. E., Sedikides, C., Verplanken, B., & Maio, G. R. (2012). Communal narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 854–878.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1959). Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
Grant, A. M., & Gino, F. (2010). A little thanks goes a long way: Explaining why gratitude expressions motivate prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 946–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haidt, J. (2012). The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. New York: Pantheon/Random House.Google Scholar
Hall, J. A. (2011). Sex differences in friendship expectations: A meta-analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28, 723–747.Google Scholar
Hart, C. M., Sedikides, C., Wildschut, T., Arndt, J., Routledge, C., & Vingerhoets, A. M. (2011). Nostalgic recollections of high and low narcissists. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 238–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, X., Inman, J. J., & Mittal, V. (2008). Gender jeopardy in financial risk taking. Journal of Marketing Research, 45, 414–424.Google Scholar
Helgeson, V. S. (1993). Implications of agency and communion for patient and spouse adjustment to a first coronary event. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 807–816.Google Scholar
Helgeson, V. S. (1994). The relation of agency and communion to well-being: Evidence and potential explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 412–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helgeson, V. S., & Fritz, H. L. (1998). A theory of unmitigated communion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 173–183.Google Scholar
Helgeson, V. S., & Fritz, H. L. (1999). Unmitigated agency and unmitigated communion: Distinctions from agency and communion. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 131–158.Google Scholar
Helgeson, V. S., & Fritz, H. L. (2000). The implications of unmitigated agency and unmitigated communion for domains of problem behavior. Journal of Personality, 68, 1031–1057.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helgeson, V. S., & Lepore, S. J. (2004). Quality of life following prostate cancer: The role of agency and unmitigated agency. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 2559–2585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, C. M., Beck, J. T., & Palmatier, R. W. (2011). Review of theoretical underpinnings of loyalty programs. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21, 256–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, R. P. (1994). Bill collectors and consumers: A troublesome exchange relationship. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 13, 20–35.Google Scholar
Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. L. (1996). Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games. American Economic Review, 86, 653–660.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Holt, C. L., & Ellis, J. B. (1998). Assessing the current validity of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Sex Roles, 39, 929–941.Google Scholar
Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & Eagly, A. H. (2002). Diminishing returns: The effects of income on the content of stereotypes of wage earners. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1538–1545.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, D. O. (1981). Agency and communion trends in consumer goods advertising. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 410–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 995–1006.Google Scholar
Koenig, A. M., Eagly, A. H., Mitchell, A. A., & Ristikari, T. (2011). Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 616–642.Google Scholar
Kurt, D. (2015). Feeling Powerful and Chasing High Returns: The Interactive Effect of Power and Agency–Communion on Financial Risk Taking. Working Paper, Boston University.Google Scholar
Kurt, D., Inman, J. J., & Argo, J. J. (2011). The influence of friends on consumer spending: The role of agency–communion and self-monitoring. Journal of Marketing Research, 48, 741–754.Google Scholar
Lambert, A., & Desmond, J. (2013). Loyal now, but not forever! A study of narcissism and male consumer-brand relationships. Psychology & Marketing, 30, 690–706.Google Scholar
Leszczynski, J. (2009). A state conceptualization: Are individuals’ masculine and feminine personality traits situationally influenced? Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 157–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippa, R. (2001). On deconstructing and reconstructing masculinity–femininity. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 168–207.Google Scholar
Ma, Z., & Dube, L. (2011). Process and outcome interdependency in frontline service encounters. Journal of Marketing, 75, 83–98.Google Scholar
Mansfield, E. D., & McAdams, D. P. (1996). Generativity and themes of agency and communion in adult autobiography. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 721–731.Google Scholar
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsuba, M., & Walker, L. J. (2005). Young adult moral exemplars: The making of self through stories. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 15, 275–297.Google Scholar
Mayer, D. & Greenberg, H. M. (1964). What makes a good salesman. Harvard Business Review (July–August), 119–125.Google Scholar
McClelland, D. C., Koestner, R., & Weinberger, J. (1989). How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ? Psychological Review, 96, 690–702.Google Scholar
Meyers-Levy, J. (1988). The influence of sex roles on judgment. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 522–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosher, C. E., & Danoff-Burg, S. (2008). Agentic and communal personality traits: Relations to disordered eating behavior, body shape concern, and depressive symptoms. Eating Behaviors, 9, 497–500.Google Scholar
Moskowitz, D. S., Suh, E., & Desaulniers, J. (1994). Situational influences on gender differences in agency and communion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 753–761.Google Scholar
Nagurney, A., & Bagwell, B. (2009). Relations of the gender-related personality traits and stress to sexual behaviors among college students. North American Journal of Psychology, 11, 85–96.Google Scholar
Paulhus, D. L., & John, O. P. (1998). Egoistic and moralistic biases in self-perception: The interplay of self-deceptive styles with basic traits and motives. Journal of Personality, 66, 1025–1060.Google Scholar
Peeters, G. (2008). The evaluative face of a descriptive model: Communion and agency in Peabody’s tetradic model of trait organization. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1066–1072.Google Scholar
Quester, P., & Steyer, A. (2010). Revisiting individual choices in group settings: The long and winding (less traveled) road? Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 1050–1057.Google Scholar
Rucker, D. D., Dubois, D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2011). Generous paupers and stingy prices: Power drives consumer spending on self versus others. Journal of Consumer Research, 6, 1015–29.Google Scholar
Rucker, D. D., Galinsky, A. D., & Dubois, D. (2012). Power and consumer behavior: How power shapes who and what consumers value. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22, 352–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, M. L., Mende, M., & Bolton, L. E. (2013), Judging the book by its cover? How consumers decode conspicuous consumption cues in buyer–seller relationship. Journal of Marketing Research, 50, 334–347.Google Scholar
Sedikides, C., Gregg, A. P., Cisek, S., & Hart, C. M. (2007). The I that buys: Narcissists as consumers. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17, 254–257.Google Scholar
Sela, A., Berger, J., & Lie, W. (2009). Variety, vice, and virtue: How assortment size influences option choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 941–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shariff, A. F., & Norenzayan, A. (2007). God is watching you: Priming God concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. Psychological Science, 18, 803–809.Google Scholar
Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 20, 580–591.Google Scholar
Smith, T. W., Gallo, L. C., Goble, L., Ngu, L. Q., & Stark, K. A. (1998). Agency, communion, and cardiovascular reactivity during marital interaction. Health Psychology, 17, 537–545.Google Scholar
Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Holahan, C. K. (1979). Negative and positive components of psychological masculinity and femininity and their relationships to self-reports of neurotic and acting out behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1673–1682.Google Scholar
Stopfer, J. M., Egloff, B., Nestler, S., & Back, M. D. (2013). Being popular in online social networks: How agentic, communal, and creativity traits relate to judgments of status and liking. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 592–598.Google Scholar
Strahan, R. F. (1975). Remarks on Bem’s measurement of psychological androgyny: Alternative methods and a supplementary analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 568–571.Google Scholar
Suh, E., Moskowitz, D. S., Fournier, M. A., & Zuroff, D. C. (2004). Gender and relationships: Influences on agentic and communal behaviors. Personal Relationships, 11, 41–59.Google Scholar
Thrash, T. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2002). Implicit and self-attributed achievement motives: Concordance and predictive validity. Journal of Personality, 70, 729–756.Google Scholar
Trapnell, P. D., & Paulhus, D. L. (2012). Agentic and communal values: Their scope and measurement. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 39–52.Google Scholar
Trudeau, K. J., Danoff-Burg, S., Revenson, T. A., & Paget, S. A. (2003). Agency and communion in people with rheumatoid arthritis. Sex Roles, 49, 303–311.Google Scholar
Trusov, M., Bodapati, A. V., & Bucklin, R. E. (2010). Determining influential users in internet social networks. Journal of Marketing Research, 47, 643–658.Google Scholar
Twenge, J. M. (1997). Changes in masculine and feminine traits over time: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 36, 305–325.Google Scholar
Uchronski, M. (2008). Agency and communion in spontaneous self-descriptions: Occurrence and situational malleability. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1093–1102.Google Scholar
Uchronski, M., Abele, A. E., & Bruckmüller, S. (2013). Empathic perspective taking and the situational malleability of the communal self-concept. Self and Identity, 12, 238–258.Google Scholar
Walker, L. J., & Frimer, J. A. (2007). Moral personality of brave and caring exemplars. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 845–860.Google Scholar
Weber, E. U., & Hsee, C. (1998). Cross-cultural differences in risk perception, but cross-cultural similarities in attitudes towards perceived risk. Management Science, 44, 1205–1217.Google Scholar
White, K. M., Speisman, J.C., Jackson, D., Bartis, S., Costos, D. (1986). Intimacy maturity and its correlates in young married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 152–162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiggins, J. S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 395–412.Google Scholar
Winterich, K. P., Mittal, V., & Ross, W. T. Jr. (2009). Donation behavior toward in-groups and out-groups: The role of gender and moral identity. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 199–214.Google Scholar
Woike, B., Gershkovich, I., Piorkowski, R., & Polo, M. (1999). The role of motives in the content and structure of autobiographical memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 600–612.Google Scholar
Woike, B., Lavezzary, E., & Barsky, J. (2001). The influence of implicit motives on memory processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 935–945.Google Scholar
Woike, B., & Polo, M. (2001). Motive-related memories: Content, structure, and affect. Journal of Personality, 69, 391–415.Google Scholar
Wojciszke, B., Abele, A. E., & Baryla, W. (2009). Two dimensions of interpersonal attitudes: Liking depends on communion, respect depends on agency. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 973–990.Google Scholar
Wojciszke, B., Baryla, W., Parzuchowski, M., Szymkow, A., & Abele, A. E. (2011). Self-esteem is dominated by agentic over communal information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 617–627.Google Scholar
Wojciszke, B., Bazinska, R., & Jaworski, M. (1998). On the dominance of moral categories in impression formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1251–1263.Google Scholar
Wojciszke, B., & Sobiczewska, P. (2013). Memory and self-esteem: The role of agentic and communal content. Social Psychology, 44, 95–102.Google Scholar
Woodside, A. G., & Davenport, J. W. Jr. (1974). The effect of salesman similarity and expertise on consumer purchasing behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 11, 198–202.Google Scholar
Ybarra, O., Chan, E., Park, H., Burnstein, E., Monin, B., & Stanik, C. (2008). Life’s recurring challenges and the fundamental dimensions: An integration and its implications for cultural differences and similarities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1083–1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ybarra, O., Park, H., Stanik, C., & Lee, D. (2012). Self-judgment and reputation monitoring as a function of the fundamental dimensions, temporal perspective, and culture. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 200–209.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Feick, L., & Mittal, V. (2014). How males and females differ in their likelihood of transmitting negative word of mouth. Journal of Consumer Research, 40, 1097–1108.Google Scholar
Zhu, R., Dholakia, U. M., Chen, X., & Algesheimer, R. (2012). Does online community participation foster risky financial behavior? Journal of Marketing Research, 49, 394–407.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×