Bibliography

doi:10.1017/9780511986451.021

Aalders, G. J. D. (1977) “Political thought in Plutarch’s Convivium Septum Sapientium”, Mnemosyne 30: 28–39.CrossRef Google Scholar

Aalders, G. J. D. (1982) Plutarch’s Political Thought. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Adam, J. (ed.) (1905) The Republic of Plato. Vol. I. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Affortunati, M. and Scardigli, B. (1992) “La vita ‘plutarchea’ di Annibale: Un’imitazione di Donato Acciaiuoli”, A&R 37: 88–105.Google Scholar

Afzelius, A. (1941) “Die politische Bedeutung des jüngeren Catos”, C&M 4: 100–203.Google Scholar

Aguilar, R. and Alfageme, I. (eds.) (2006) Ecos de Plutarco en Europa: de fortuna Plutarchi studia selecta. Madrid.Google Scholar

Aguilar Perdomo, M. (1999) “La utilización de la Vidas paralelas de Plutarco en el Felixmarte de Hircania: a propósito de su autor, Melchor de Ortega”, Thesaurus: Boletín del Instituto Caro y Cuervo 54: 289–306.Google Scholar

Ahlrichs, B. (2005) Prüfstein der Gemüter: Untersuchungen zu den ethischen Vorstellungen in den Parallelbiographien Plutarchs am Beispiel des Coriolan [Beiträge zur Altertumswissenschaft 16]. Hildesheim.Google Scholar

Alcalde Martín, C. (1999) “Rasgos socráticos de la personalidad de Foción en la Vida de Plutarco”, in Pérez Jiménez, García López, and Aguilar (1999), 159–172.Google Scholar

Alcock, S. (2002) Archaeologies of the Greek Past: Landscapes, Monuments, and Memories. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Alden, M. (2005) “Lions in paradise: lion similes in the Iliad and the lion cubs of Il.18.318–22”, CQ 55: 335–342.CrossRef Google Scholar

Alemán Illán, J. (2005) “Plutarco y Aristóteles en Francisco Cascales: Evolución del concepto de διάνοια en la teoría literaria del Humanismo”, Myrtia 20: 255–264.Google Scholar

Alexander, P. (1940) “Secular biography at Byzantium”, Speculum 15: 194–209.CrossRef Google Scholar

Alexandridis, A., Wild, M., and Winkler-Horaček, L. (eds.) (2008) Mensch und Tier in der Antike: Grenzziehung und Grenzüberschreitung: Symposion vom 7. bis 9. April 2005 in Rostock. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Alexiou, E. (1999) “Zur Darstellung der ὀργή in Plutarchs Bioi”, Philologus 143.1: 101–113.CrossRef Google Scholar

Alexiou, E. (2008) “Eunoia bei Plutarch: von den Praecepta Gerendae Reipublicae zu den Viten”, in Nikolaidis, (2008), 365–386.CrossRef Google Scholar

Alexiou, E. (2010) “Plutarchs Lysander und Alkibiades als ‘Syzygie’”, RhM 153: 323–352.Google Scholar

Alikin, V. (2009) “The reading of texts at the Graeco-Roman symposium and in the Christian gathering”, in Ribeiro Ferreira et al. (2009), 103–112.Google Scholar

Almagor, E. (2005) “Who is a barbarian? The barbarians in the ethnological and cultural taxonomies of Strabo”, in Dueck, D., Lindsay, H., and Pothecary, S. (eds.), Strabo’s Cultural Geography. Cambridge, 42–55.Google Scholar

Almagor, E. (2009) “A ‘barbarian’ symposium and the absence of philanthropia (Artaxerxes 15)”, in Ribeiro Ferreira et al. (2009), 131–146.Google Scholar

Almagor, E. (2009–10) “Characterization through animals: the case of Plutarch’s Artaxerxes”, Ploutarchos 7: 3–22.Google Scholar

Almagor, E. (2013) “‘But this belongs to another discussion’: exploring the ethnographic digressions in Plutarch”, in Almagor, and Skinner, (2013), 153–178.Google Scholar

Almagor, E. (2014a) “Aratus and Artaxerxes”, in Beck, (2014a), 278–291.Google Scholar

Almagor, E. (2014b) “Hold your horses: characterization through animals in Plutarch’s Artaxerxes. Part II”, Ploutarchos 11: 3–18.Google Scholar

Almagor, E. (2016a) “Josephus and Greek imperial literature”, in Chapman, H. and Rodgers, Z. (eds.), A Companion to Josephus. Malden, MA, 108–122.Google Scholar

Almagor, E. (2016b) “Parallel narratives and possible worlds in Plutarch’s Life of Artaxerxes”, in De Temmerman, and Demoen, (2016), Cambridge, 65–79.Google Scholar

Almagor, E. (2017a) “The empire brought back: Persianism in imperial Greek literature”, in Strootman, R. and Versluys, M. (eds.), Persianism in Antiquity. Stuttgart, 327–343.Google Scholar

Almagor, E. (2017b) “Plutarch and the Persians”, Electrum 24: 123–168.Google Scholar

Almagor, E. (2018) Plutarch and the Persica. Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Almagor, E. (2019) “Echoes of the Persian Wars in the European Phase of the Roman-Syrian War (with an Emphasis on Plut., Cat. Mai. 12–14)”, in Coşkun, A. A. and Engels, D. (eds.), Rome and the Seleukid East: Selected Papers from Seleukid Study Day V, Brussels, 21–23 August 2015. Brussels, 87–133.Google Scholar

Almagor, E. (2022) “When Hermes enters: towards a typology of the silences of Plutarch’s narrator and their uses in characterization”, in J. Beneker, C. Cooper, N. Humble, and F. B. Titchener (eds.), Plutarch’s Unexpected Silences: Suppression and Selection in the Lives and Moralia. Leiden, 11–35.Google Scholar

Almagor, E. (2023), “Plutarch’s parallelism and resistance”, in D. Jolowicz and J. Elsner (eds.), Articulating Resistance under the Roman Empire, Cambridge, 89–111.CrossRef Google Scholar

Almagor, E. and Skinner, J. (eds.) (2013) Ancient Ethnography: New Approaches. London.Google Scholar

Alston, R. (1996) “Conquest by text: Juvenal and Plutarch on Egypt”, in Webster, J. and Cooper, N. (eds.), Roman Imperialism: Post-Colonial Perspectives. Leicester, 99–109.Google Scholar

Álvarez Rodríguez, A. (1983) “Las ‘vidas de hombres ilustres’ (Nos. 70–72 de la Bibl. Nac. de París), edición y estudio”, Colección Tesis doctorales; n. 107/83, Departamento de Filología Románica, Facultad de Filología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid.Google Scholar

Álvarez Rodríguez, A. (1984) “Plutarco romanceado en el siglo XIV: suerte e importancia de la traducción aragonesa”, Cuadernos de Filología 4: 143–158.Google Scholar

Alvarez, A. (1985) “Los helenismos en las traducciones de Juan Fernández de Heredia”, Cuadernos de Filología 5: 99–110.Google Scholar

Alvarez, A. (ed.) (2009) Plutarco de Queronea: Vidas semblantes. Versión aragonesa de las Vidas paralelas, patrocinada por Juan Fernández de Heredia. Vols. I–II. Zaragoza.Google Scholar

Amyot, J. (1559) Plutarque: les vies des hommes illustres. 2 vols. Paris.Google Scholar

Amyot, J. (1565) Les vies des hommes illustres, Grecs et Romans, comparées l’une avec l’autre par Plutarque de Cheronee. Paris.Google Scholar

Amyot, J. (1572) Plutarque oeuvres morales et meslees. 2 vols. Paris.Google Scholar

Anastos, M. (1949) Review of Westerink (1948) Speculum 24: 446–450.Google Scholar

Anderson, G. (1976) Lucian: Theme and Variation in the Second Sophistic. Leiden.CrossRef Google Scholar

Anderson, G. (1989) “The Pepaideumenos in action: Sophists and their outlook in the early Roman Empire”, ANRW II.33.1: 79–208.Google Scholar

Anderson, G. (1993) The Second Sophistic: A Cultural Phenomenon in the Roman Empire. London.Google Scholar

Andrei, O. (1989) “Introduzione”, in Andrei, O. and Scuderi, R. (eds.), Plutarco: vite parallele, Demetrio – Antonio. Milan, 35–93.Google Scholar

Arco Magrí, M. (1991) “Una pagina de Metochite sul Περὶ Ὁμήρου di Plutarco”, in D’Ippolito and Gallo (1991), 461–473.Google Scholar

Armstrong, A. (1948) “Anacharsis the Scythian”, G&R 17: 18–23.Google Scholar

Ash, R. (1997) “Severed heads: individual portraits and irrational forces in Plutarch’s Galba and Otho”, in Mossman, (1997a), 189–214.Google Scholar

Ash, R. (2008) “Standing in the shadows: Plutarch and the emperors in the Lives and Moralia”, in Nikolaidis (2008), 557–575.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ash, R., J. Mossman, and F. B. Titchener (eds.) (2015) Fame and Infamy: Essays for Christopher Pelling on Characterization in Greek and Roman Biography and History. Oxford.Google Scholar

Asirvatham, S. (2005) “Classicism and Romanitas in Plutarch’s De Alexandri Fortuna Aut Virtute”, AJPh 126: 107–125.Google Scholar

Astin, A. E. (1978) Cato the Censor. Oxford.Google Scholar

Aulotte, R. (1965) Amyot et Plutarque: La tradition des Moralia au XVI^e siècle. Geneva.Google Scholar

Auzépy, M. (2008) “State of emergency (700–850)”, in Shepard (2008), 251–291.Google Scholar

Averintsev, S. (2002) “From biography to hagiography”, in French and St Clair (2002), 19–36.Google Scholar

Babbitt, F. (ed. and trans.) (1927) Plutarch’s Moralia: Vol. I. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Babut, D. (1963) “Les Stoïciens et l’amour”, REG 76: 55–63.Google Scholar

Babut, D. (ed.) (1969a) Plutarque, De la vertu éthique. Paris.Google Scholar

Babut, D. (1969b) Plutarque et le stoïcisme. Paris.Google Scholar

Babut, D. (1984) “Le dialogue de Plutarque sur le démon de Socrate: essai d’interpretation”, BAGB 1: 51–76. Reprinted in Babut (1994), 405–430.Google Scholar

Babut, D. (1992) “La composition des Dialogues Pythiques de Plutarque et le problème de leur unité”, Journal des Savants 2: 187–234. Reprinted in Babut (1994), 457–504.Google Scholar

Babut, D. (1994) Parerga: choix d’articles de Daniel Babut. Lyon.Google Scholar

Baker, P. (ed.) (2017) Biography, Historiography, and Modes of Philosophizing: The Tradition of Collective Biography in Early Modern Europe. Leiden.Google Scholar

Baker, P., R. Kaiser, M. Priesterjahn, and J. Helmrath (eds.) (2016) Portraying the Prince in the Renaissance: The Humanist Depiction of Rulers in Historiographical and Biographical Texts. Berlin.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bakker, E. J. (ed.) (2010), A Companion to the Ancient Greek Language. Malden, MA.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bakhtin, M. (1981) The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, ed. Holquist, M.. Emerson, Trans. C., and Holquist, M.. Austin, TX.Google Scholar

Balard, M. (ed.) (1986) Fortunes de Jacques Amyot: actes du colloque international. Paris.Google Scholar

Baldassari, M. (2000) “Osservazioni sulla struttura del period e sulla costruzione ritmica del discorso nei Moralia di Plutarco”, in Van der Stockt (2000b), 1–13.Google Scholar

Baldassarri, S. and Begemihl, R. (eds.) (2003) G. Manetti: Biographical Writings. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Baldwin, B. (1995) “Plutarch in Byzantium”, Byzantion 65: 525–526.Google Scholar

Baltes, M. (2000) “La dottrina dell’anima in Plutarco”, Elenchos 21: 245–270.Google Scholar

Baltes, M. (2005a) “Mittelplatonische ἐπιτομαί zu den Werken und der Philosophie Platons”, in Baltes (2005c), 155–169.CrossRef Google Scholar

Baltes, M. (2005b) “Plutarchs Lehre von der Seele”, in Baltes (2005c), 77–99.Google Scholar

Baltes, M. (2005c), ΕΠΙΝΟΗΜΑΤΑ: Kleine Schriften zur antiken Philosophie und homerischen Dichtung von Matthias Baltes, ed. M.-L. Lakmann. Munich.Google Scholar

Banta, J. (2006) Imperium cum finibus: Plutarch’s Archaic Rome. Diss., State University of New York at Buffalo.Google Scholar

Banta, J. (2007a) “Who gives a fig (tree a name)? Chronotopic conflicts in Plutarch’s Romulus”, Intertexts 11: 25–41.Google Scholar

Banta, J. (2007b) “The Gates of Janus: Bakhtin and Plutarch’s Roman meta-chronotope”, in Larmour and Spencer (2007), 238–270.Google Scholar

Baragwanath, E. (2008) Motivation and Narrative in Herodotus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (2000) “The crossing”, in Harrison, S. (ed.), Texts, Ideas, and the Classics. Oxford, 142–163.Google Scholar

Barigazzi, A. (1984) “Plutarco e il corso futuro della storia”, Prometheus 10: 264–286. Reprinted in Barigazzi (1994), 303–330.Google Scholar

Barigazzi, A. (ed.) (1993) Plutarco. Se la virtù si debba insegnare (La fortuna, Se la virtù si possa insegnare). Se siano più gravi le malattie dell’animo o del corpo, Se il vizio sia sufficiente a rendere infelici, La virtù e il vizio (CPM 17). Naples.Google Scholar

Barigazzi, A. (1994) Studi su Plutarco. Florence.Google Scholar

Barnwell, H. (ed.) (1965) Pierre Corneille: Writings on the Theatre. Oxford.Google Scholar

Baron, H. (1928) Leonardo Bruni Aretino: Humanistisch-Philosophische Schriften; mit einer Chronologie seiner Werke und Briefe. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Baron, H. (1955) Humanistic and Political Literature in Florence and Venice at the Beginning of the Quattrocento. Studies in Criticism and Chronology. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Baron, H. (1966) The Crisis of the Early Italian Renaissance. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Barroll, J. (1958) “Shakespeare and Roman history”, Modern Language Review 53: 327–343.Google Scholar

Barrow, R. (1967) Plutarch and His Times. London.Google Scholar

Barzanò, A., Bearzot, C., Landucci, F., Prandi, L., and Zecchini, G. (eds.) (2003) Modelli eroici dall’Antichità alla cultura Europea. Rome.Google Scholar

Bauman, R. (2007) “The emergent quality of performance”, in Monaghan and Goodman (2007), 35–37.Google Scholar

Bazzani, M. (2006) “Theodore Metochites, a Byzantine humanist”, Byzantion 76: 32–52.Google Scholar

Bearzot, C. (ed.) (1993) Plutarco vite parallele: Focione (introduzione, traduzione e note di Cinzia Bearzot), Catone Uticense (introduzione di Joseph Geiger, traduzione e note di Lucia Ghilli). Milan.Google Scholar

Becchi, F. (1975) “Aristotelismo ed antistoicismo nel ‘De virtute morali’ di Plutarco”, Prometheus 1: 160–180.Google Scholar

Becchi, F. (1978) “Aristotelismo funzionale nel ‘De virtute morali’ di Plutarco”, Prometheus 4: 261–275.Google Scholar

Becchi, F. (1981) “Platonismo medio ed etica plutarchea”, Prometheus 7: 125–145.Google Scholar

Becchi, F. (1990a) “La nozione di ὀργή e di ἀοργησία in Aristotele e in Plutarco”, Prometheus 16: 65–87.Google Scholar

Becchi, F. (ed.) (1990b) Plutarco: la virtù etica. Introduzione, testo critico, traduzione e commento (CPM 5). Naples.Google Scholar

Becchi, F. (1993) “Istinto e intelligenza negli scritti zoopsicologici di Plutarco”, in Bandini, M. and Pericoli, F. (eds.), Scritti in memoria di Dino Pieraccioni. Florence, 59–83.Google Scholar

Becchi, F. (1999) “Plutarco tra platonismo ed aristotelismo: la filosofia come paideia dell’anima”, in Pérez Jiménez, García López, and Aguilar (1999), 25–43.Google Scholar

Becchi, F. (2000) “Irrazionalità e razionalità degli animali negli scritti di Plutarco”, Prometheus 26: 205–225.Google Scholar

Becchi, F. (2001) “Biopsicologia e giustizia verso gli animali in Teofrasto e Plutarco”, Prometheus 27: 119–135.Google Scholar

Becchi, F. (2005) “Éthique et régime alimentaire dans les écrits plutarquiens de psychologie animale”, in Boulogne (2005b), 145–156.Google Scholar

Becchi, F. (2007) “Para una interpretación unitaria de la doctrina del eros en Plutarco”, in Nieto Ibáñez and López López (2007), 95–103.Google Scholar

Becchi, F. (2009a) “La notion de philanthropia chez Plutarque: contexte social et sources philosophiques”, in Ribeiro Ferreira et al. (2009), 263–273.Google Scholar

Becchi, F. (2009b) “Le traduzioni latine dei Moralia di Plutarco tra XIII e XVI secolo”, in Volpe Cacciatore (2009), 11–52.Google Scholar

Becchi, F. (2014) “Plutarch, Aristotle, and the Peripatetics”, in Beck (2014a), 73–87.Google Scholar

Becchi, F. (2019) “Humanist Latin translations of the Moralia”, in Xenophontos and Oikonomopoulou (2019), 458–478.Google Scholar

Beck, H. (2002) “Interne synkrisis bei Plutarch”, Hermes 130: 467–489.Google Scholar

Beck, H. (2003) “Parallele Karrieren – Parallele Leben? Plutarchs Fabius Maximus und Marcellus”, in Barzanò, et al. (2003), 239–263.Google Scholar

Beck, M. (1998) Plutarch’s Use of Anecdotes in the Lives. Diss., University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar

Beck, M. (2000) “Anecdote and the representation of Plutarch’s ethos”, in Van der Stockt (2000b), 15–32.Google Scholar

Beck, M. (2002) “Plutarch to Trajan: the dedicatory letter and the Apophthegmata collection”, in Stadter and Van der Stockt (2002), 163–173.Google Scholar

Beck, M. (2004) “Plutarch on the statesman’s independence of action”, in de Blois et al. (2004), 105–114.Google Scholar

Beck, M. (2005) “The presentation of ideology and the use of subliterary forms in Plutarch’s works”, in Pérez Jiménez and Titchener (2005), 51–68.Google Scholar

Beck, M. (2007a) “Plutarch”, in I. J. F. de Jong and R. Nünlist (eds.) Time in Ancient Greek Narratives: Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative. Vol. II. Leiden, 397–411.Google Scholar

Beck, M. (2007b) “The story of Damon and the ideology of euergetism in the Lives of Cimon and Lucullus”, Hermathena 182: 53–69.Google Scholar

Beck, M. (2009) “Cena apud Catones: ideology and sympotic behavior”, in Ribeiro Ferreira et al. (2009), 147–163.Google Scholar

Beck, M. (2010) “Plutarch’s hypomnemata”, in Horster and Reitz (2010), 349–367.Google Scholar

Beck, M. (2012) “Plutarch”, in I. J. F. de Jong (ed.) Space in Ancient Greek Literature: Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative. Vol. III. Leiden, 441–462.Google Scholar

Beck, M. (2013) “Alexander for the Romans: the ideology of anger control in Plutarch and Arrian”, in Pace and Volpe Cassiatore (2013), 47–61.Google Scholar

Beck, M. (ed.) (2014a) A Companion to Plutarch. Chichester.Google Scholar

Beck, M. (2014b) “The Socratic paradigm”, in Beck (2014a), 463–478.Google Scholar

Beck, M. (2016) “The serio-comic Life of Antony”, in Opsomer, Roskam, and Titchener (2016), 137–146.CrossRef Google Scholar

Beier, A. (1985) Masterless Men: The Vagrancy Problem in England, 1560–1640. London.Google Scholar

Bekker, I. (ed.) (1838) Theophanes Continuatus. Bonn.Google Scholar

Belfiore, E. (1986) “Wine and catharsis of the emotions in Plato’s Laws”, CQ 36: 421–437.Google Scholar

Bellanti, A. (2003) “Aristotele pitagorico? La concezione della medietà nel De virtute morali di Plutarco”, RFN 95: 3–36.Google Scholar

Beneker, J. (2005) “Thematic correspondence in Plutarch’s Lives of Caesar, Pompey, and Crassus”, in de Blois et al. (2005), 315–325.Google Scholar

Beneker, J. (2009) “Drunken violence and the transition of power in Plutarch’s Alexander”, in Ribeiro Ferreira et al. (2009), 193–200.Google Scholar

Beneker, J. (2011) “Plutarch and Saint Basil as readers of Greek literature”, SyllClass 22: 95–111.Google Scholar

Beneker, J. (2012) The Passionate Statesman: Eros and Politics in Plutarch’s Lives. Oxford.Google Scholar

Beneker, J. (2014) “Sex, eroticism, and politics”, in Beck (2014a), 503–515.Google Scholar

Bergua Cavero, J. (1991) “Cinismo, ironía y retórica en el Bruta ratione uti de Plutarco”, in García López and Calderón Dorda (1991), 13–19.Google Scholar

Bergua Cavero, J. (1995) Estudios sobre la tradición de Plutarco en España (siglos XIII–XVII). Zaragoza.Google Scholar

Bers, V. (2010) “Kunstprosa: philosophy, history, oratory,” in Bakker (2010), 455–467.Google Scholar

Berschin, W. (1983a) “Sueton und Plutarch im 14. Jahrhundert”, in Buck, A. (ed.), Biographie und Autobiographie in der Renaissance. Wiesbaden, 35–43.Google Scholar

Berschin, W. (ed.) (1983b) Biographie zwischen Renaissance und Barock. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Berthelot, K. (2002) “Philo and kindness towards animals (De virtutibus 125–147)”, The Studia Philonica Annual 14: 49–65.Google Scholar

Besterman, T. (1926) “Bibliography of Cleopatra”, Notes Queries 150.6: 93–97, 111–114.Google Scholar

Beta, S. (2009) “Riddling at table: trivial ainigmata vs. philosophical problemata”, in Ribeiro Ferreira et al. (2009), 97–102.Google Scholar

Bettini, M. and Franco, C. (2009) “La notion de philanthrōpia chez Plutarque: contexte social et sources philosophiques”, in Ribeiro Ferreira et al. (2009), 263–273.Google Scholar

Bettini, M. and Franco, C. (2010) Il mito di Circe: Immagini e racconti dalla Grecia a oggi. Turin.Google Scholar

Betz, H.-D. (ed.) (1978) Plutarch’s Ethical Writings and Early Christian Literature. Leiden.Google Scholar

Bevegni, C. (1993) “Teodoro Gaza traduttore del ‘Maxime cum principibus philosopho esse disserendum’ di Plutarco: primi appunti per un’edizione critica con particolare riguardo alla lettera dedicatoria ad Andrea Bussi”, in S. Feraboli (ed.), Mosaico: Studi in onore di Umberto Albini. Genova, 33–42.Google Scholar

Billault, A. (2005) “Le modèle animal dans le traité de Plutarque”, in Boulogne (2005b), 33–42.Google Scholar

Biraud, M. (2014) “Usages narratifs des clausules métriques et des égalités syllabiques dans l’Eroticos de Plutarque”, Ploutarchos 11: 39–55.Google Scholar

Blackwell, C. (1986) “Humanism and politics in English royal biography: the use of Cicero, Plutarch, and Sallust in the ‘Vita Henrici Quinti’ (1438) by Titus Livius de Frulovisi and the ‘Vita Henrici Septimi’ (1500–1503) by Bernard André”, in McFarlane, I. (ed.), Acta Conventus Neo-Latini Sanctandreani: Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress of Neo-Latin Studies. Binghamton, NY,431–440.Google Scholar

Blamire, A. (ed.) (1989) Plutarch, Life of Kimon. London.Google Scholar

Blomqvist, K. (1997) “From Olympias to Aretaphila: women in politics in Plutarch”, in Mossman (1997a), 73–97.Google Scholar

Bloom, A., (ed.) (1991) The Republic of Plato, 2nd ed. New York.Google Scholar

Blunt, A. (1995) Poussin. London.Google Scholar

Boas, F. (ed.) (1911) Caesar’s Revenge by Anon. (1611). Oxford.Google Scholar

Bodin, J. (1969) Methodus ad facilem historiarum cognitionem. Trans. B. Reynolds. New York.Google Scholar

Boissonade, J. F. (ed.) (1964) Michael Psellus: De operatione daemonum. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2003) Academici e Platonici: Il dibattito antico sullo scetticismo di Platone. Milan.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2007) “Plutarco, l’Academia e la politica”, in Volpe Cacciatore and Ferrari (2007), 265–280.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2009) “Antiochus’ ethics and the subordination of Stoicism”, in Bonazzi and Opsomer (2009), 33–54.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2016) “The perfidious strategies, or, the Platonists against Stoicism”, in Weisser and Thaler (2016), 166–184.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. and Opsomer, J. (2009) The Origins of the Platonic System: Platonisms of the Early Empire and Their Philosophical Contexts (Collection d’études classiques, 23). Louvain.Google Scholar

Bosworth, A. (1988) From Arrian to Alexander: Studies in Historical Interpretation. Oxford.Google Scholar

Bosworth, A. (1992) “History and artifice in Plutarch’s Eumenes”, in Stadter (1992b), 56–89.Google Scholar

Boulanger, A. (1923) Aelius Aristide. Paris.Google Scholar

Boulet, B. (2005) “Is Numa the genuine philosopher king?” in de Blois et al. (2005), 245–256.Google Scholar

Boulet, B. (2014) “The philosopher king”, in Beck (2014a), 449–462.Google Scholar

Boulogne, J. (1992) “Les ‘Questions Romaines’ de Plutarque”, ANRW II.33.6: 4682–4708.Google Scholar

Boulogne, J. (1994) Plutarque: Un aristocrate grec sous l’occupation romaine. Villeneuve d’Ascq.Google Scholar

Boulogne, J. (1996) “Plutarque et la Médecine”, ANRW II.37.3: 2762–2792.Google Scholar

Boulogne, J. (2000) “Les ΣΥΓΚΡΙΣΕΙΣ de Plutarque: Une rhétorique de la ΣΥΝΚΡΑΣΙΣ”, in Van der Stockt (2000b), 33–44.Google Scholar

Boulogne, J. (2003) Plutarque dans le miroir d’Épicure. Villeneuve d’Ascq.Google Scholar

Boulogne, J. (2005a) “Le culte égyptien des animaux vu par Plutarque: Une étiologie égyptienne (Isis et Osiris, 71–76, 379D–382 C)”, in Boulogne (2005b), 197–205.Google Scholar

Boulogne, J. (ed.) (2005b) Les Grecs de l’antiquité et les animaux: Le cas remarquable de Plutarque. Villeneuve d’Ascq.Google Scholar

Boulogne, J. (2009–10) “La philosophie du mariage chez Plutarque”, Ploutarchos 7: 23–34.Google Scholar

Bovon, A. (1963) “La représentation des guerriers perses et la notion de barbare dans la première moitié du cinquième siècle”, BCH 87: 579–602.Google Scholar

Bowen, A. (ed.) (1992) Plutarch: The Malice of Herodotus (de Malignitate Herodoti). Warminster.Google Scholar

Bowersock, G. W. (1969) Greek Sophists and the Roman Empire. Oxford.Google Scholar

Bowersock, G. (1995) “The barbarism of the Greeks,” HSCPh 97: 3–14.Google Scholar

Bowersock, G. W. and C. P. Jones (1974) “A guide to the sophists in Philostratus’ Vitae Sophistarum”, in G. W. Bowersock (ed.), Approaches to the Second Sophistic. University Park, PA, 35–40.Google Scholar

Bowie, A. (2003) “‘Fate may harm me, I have dined today’: near-eastern royal banquets and Greek symposia in Herodotus”, Pallas 61: 99–109.Google Scholar

Bowie, E. (1970) “Greeks and their past in the Second Sophistic”, P&P 46: 3–41. Reprinted in M. Finley (ed.) (1974) Studies in Ancient Society. London, 166–209.Google Scholar

Bowie, E. (1986) “Early Greek elegy, symposium and public festival”, JHS 106: 13–35.Google Scholar

Bowie, E. (1993) “Greek table-talk before Plato”, Rhetorica 11.4: 355–373.Google Scholar

Bowie, E. (2008) “Plutarch’s habits of citation: aspects of difference”, in Nikolaidis (2008), 143–157.Google Scholar

Bowie, E. (2014) “Poetry and education”, in Beck (2014a), 177–190.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. (1997) “Thyrsus-bearer of the academy or enthusiast for Plato?” in Mossman (1997a), 41–58.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. (1998) “Plutarch on koinos logos: towards an architecture of the De Stoicorum Repugnantiis”, OSAPh 16: 299–329.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. (2001) Post-Hellenistic Philosophy: A Study of Its Development from the Stoics to Origen. Oxford.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. (2018) Platonist Philosophy 80 BC to AD 250: An Introduction and Collection of Sources in Translation. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. (2019) “Difference, opposition, and the roots of intolerance in ancient philosophical polemic”, in van Kooten, G. H. and van Ruiten, J. (eds.), Intolerance, Polemics, and Debate in Antiquity: Politico-Cultural, Philosophical, and Religious Forms of Critical Conversation. Leiden, 259–281.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G., Graziosi, B., and Vasunia, P. (eds.) (2009) Oxford Companion of Hellenic Studies. Oxford.Google Scholar

Braden, G. (2004) “Plutarch, Shakespeare, and the alpha males”, in Martindale (2004), 188–205.Google Scholar

Braden, G. (2014) “Shakespeare”, in Beck (2014a), 577–591.Google Scholar

Bradley, K. (2000), “Animalizing the slave: the truth of fiction”, JRS 90: 110–125.Google Scholar

Branham, R. Bracht (1989) Unruly Eloquence: Lucian and the Comedy of Traditions. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Branham, R. Bracht (1996) “Defacing the currency: Diogenes’ rhetoric and the invention of Cynicism”, in Branham and Goulet-Cazé (1996), 81–104.Google Scholar

Branham, R and Goulet-Cazé, M.-O. (eds.) (1996) The Cynics: The Cynic Movement in Antiquity and Its Legacy. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

Braund, D. (1993) “Dionysiac tragedy in Plutarch’s Crassus”, CQ 43: 468–474.Google Scholar

Braund, D. and Wilkins, J. (eds.) (2000) Athenaeus and His World: Reading Greek Culture in the Roman Empire. Exeter.Google Scholar

Bréchet, C. (2003) “Les palaioi chez Plutarque”, in Bakhouche, B. (ed.), L’Ancienneté chez les anciens, vol. II: Mythologie et Religion. Montpellier, 519–550.Google Scholar

Bréchet, C. (2005) “La Philosophie de Gryllos”, in Boulogne (2005b), 43–62.Google Scholar

Bréchet, C. (2007) “Vers une philosophie de la citation poétique: écrit, oral et mémoire chez Plutarque”, Hermathena 182: 101–134.Google Scholar

Brélaz, C. (2008) “L’adieu aux armes. La défense de la cité grecque dans l’Empire romain pacifié”, in Brélaz, C. and Ducrey, P. (eds.), Sécurité collective et ordre public dans les sociétés anciennes. Geneva, 155–196.Google Scholar

Bremer, J. (2005) “Plutarch and the ‘liberation of Greece’”, in de Blois et al. (2005), 257–267.Google Scholar

Brenk, F. (1977) In Mist Apparelled: Religious Themes in Plutarch’s Moralia and Lives. Leiden.Google Scholar

Brenk, F. (1986) “In the light of the moon: demonology in the early imperial period”, ANRW II.16.3: 2068–2145.Google Scholar

Brenk, F. (1987) “An imperial heritage: the religious spirit of Plutarch of Chaironeia”, ANRW II. 36.1: 248–349.Google Scholar

Brenk, F. (1992) “Plutarch’s life ‘Markos Antonios:’ a literary and cultural study”, ANRW II.33.6: 4347–4402.Google Scholar

Brenk, F. (1996) “Time as structure in Plutarch’s The Daimonion of Sokrates”, in Van der Stockt (1996), 29–51. Reprinted in Brenk (1998), 59–81.Google Scholar

Brenk, F. (1998) Relighting the Souls: Studies in Plutarch, in Greek Literature, Religion, and Philosophy and in the New Testament Background. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Brenk, F. (2000) “All for love: the rhetoric of exaggeration in Plutarch’s Erotikos”, in Van der Stockt (2000b), 45–60.Google Scholar

Brenk, F. (2002) “Religion under Trajan: Plutarch’s resurrection of Osiris”, in Stadter and Van der Stockt (2002), 73–92.Google Scholar

Brenk, F. (2005) “The barbarian within: Gallic and Galatian heroines in Plutarch’s Erotikos”, in Pérez Jiménez and Titchener (2005), 93–106.Google Scholar

Brenk, F. (2007) With Unperfumed Voice: Studies in Plutarch, in Greek Literature, Religion and Philosophy, and in the New Testament Background. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Brenk, F. (2009) “In learned conversation: Plutarch’s symposiac literature and the elusive authorial voice”, in Ribeiro Ferreira et al. (2009), 51–61.Google Scholar

Brennan, T. (1998) “The old Stoic theory of emotions”, in Sihvola, J. and Engberg-Pedersen, T. (eds.), Emotions in Hellenistic Philosophy. Dordrecht, 21–70.Google Scholar

Brennan, T. (2003) “Stoic moral psychology”, in Inwood, (2003), 257–294.Google Scholar

Briant, P. (2002a) From Cyrus to Alexander: A History of the Persian Empire. Trans. P. T. Daniels. Winona Lake, IN.Google Scholar

Briant, P. (2002b) “History and ideology: the Greeks and ‘Persian decadence’”, in Harrison (2002), 193–210.Google Scholar

Brisson, L. (1997) “Le corps animal comme signe de la valeur d’une âme chez Platon”, in Cassin and Labarrière (1997), 227–245.Google Scholar

Brittain, C. (2001) Philo of Larissa: The Last of the Academic Sceptics. Oxford.Google Scholar

Brouillette, X. (2014) La Philosophie delphique de Plutarque. L’itinéraire des Dialogues pythiques. Paris.Google Scholar

Brouillette, X. and Giavatto, A. (eds.) (2011) Les dialogues platoniciens chez Plutarque: Stratégies et méthodes exégétiques. Leuven.Google Scholar

Brown, A. (1992) The Medici in Power: The Exercise and Language of Power. Florence.Google Scholar

Browning, R. (1975) “Enlightenment and repression in Byzantium in the eleventh and twelfth centuries”, P&P 69: 3–23.Google Scholar

Brubaker, L. and Haldon, J. (2011) Byzantium in the Iconoclast Era c. 680–850: A History. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Bryson, N. (1981) Word and Image: French Painting of the Ancien Régime. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Bucher-Isler, B. (1972) Norm und Individualität in den Biographien Plutarchs. Bern.Google Scholar

Buckler, G. (1929) Anna Comnena: A Study. Oxford.Google Scholar

Buckler, J. (1992) “Plutarch and autopsy”, ANRW II.33.6: 4788–4830.Google Scholar

Bullock, A. (1991) Hitler and Stalin: Parallel Lives. New York.Google Scholar

Bullough, G. (ed.) (1957–79) Narrative and Dramatic Sources of Shakespeare (8 vols.). London.Google Scholar

Burgess, S. (2008) “Plato’s Timaeus on clever and non-clever creatures”, in Alexandridis, Wild, and Winkler-Horaček (2008), 13–26.Google Scholar

Burkert, W. (1996) “Plutarco: Religiosità personale e teologia filosofica”, in Gallo (1996), 11–28.Google Scholar

Burns, A. (2015) Diatribe and Plutarch’s Practical Ethics. Diss., University of Iowa.Google Scholar

Burns, J. M. (1978) Leadership. New York.Google Scholar

Burridge, R. (2004) What Are the Gospels? A Comparison with Graeco-Roman Biography, 2nd ed. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar

Burrow, C. (2013) Shakespeare and Classical Antiquity. Oxford.Google Scholar

Busine, A. (2002) Les sept sages de la Grèce antique: Transmission et utilisation d’un patrimone légendaire d’Hérodote à Plutarque. Paris.Google Scholar

Buszard, B. (2005a) “The decline of the Roman republic in Pyrrhus–Marius”, in de Blois et al. (2005), 281–296.Google Scholar

Buszard, B. (2005b) “The decline of Roman statesmanship in Plutarch’s Pyrrhus–Marius”, CQ 55: 481–497.Google Scholar

Buszard, B. (2008) “Caesar’s ambition: a combined reading of Plutarch’s Alexander–Caesar and Pyrrhus–Marius”, TAPhA 138: 185–215.Google Scholar

Buszard, B. (2010) “The speech of Greek and Roman women in Plutarch’s Lives”, CPh 105: 83–115.Google Scholar

Bydén, B. (2002) “The nature and purpose of the Semeioseis gnomikai: the antithesis of philosophy and rhetoric”, in Hult (2002), 245–288.Google Scholar

Byl, S. (1977) “Plutarque et la vieillesse”, LEC 45: 107–123.Google Scholar

Caballos Rufino, A. (1990) Los senadores hispanorromanos y la romanización de Hispania (Sigla 1 al III p.C). I: Prosopograifia (Monografias del Departamento de Historia Antigua de la Universidad de Sevilla). Écija.Google Scholar

Cacciari, A. (1995) “Plutarco”, in Mattioli, U. (ed.), Senectus: La vecchiaia nel mondo classico. Vol. I: Grecia. Bologna, 361–395.Google Scholar

Caiazza, A. (ed.) (1993) Precetti politici (CPM 14). Naples.Google Scholar

Calder, L. (2011) Cruelty and Sentimentality: Greek Attitudes to Animals, 600–300 BC. Oxford.Google Scholar

Calder, L. (2017) “Pet and image in the Greek world: the use of domesticated animals in human interaction”, in Fögen and Thomas (2017), 61–83.Google Scholar

Calderón Dorda, E. (1999) “El vino, la medicina y los ‘remedia ebrietatis’ en los Moralia de Plutarco”, in Montes Cala et al. (1999), 119–128.Google Scholar

Calkins, G. (ed.) (1943) Antoine de Montchrestien: Les Lacènes. Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar

Cameron, A. (2006) The Byzantines. Chichester.Google Scholar

Cameron, A., J. Herrin, A. Cameron, R. Cormack, and C. Roueché, (eds.) (1984) Constantinople in the Early Eighth Century: The Parastaseis Syntomoi Chronikai. New York.Google Scholar

Cammelli, G. (1941) “Manuele Crisolora”, in I dotti bizantini e le origini dell’umanesimo: Vol. I. Florence.Google Scholar

Campangne, H.-T. (2012) “Poétique de l’instant tragique: la place et l’influence des Vies de Plutarque dans la définition du tragique en France, 1600–1645”, in Guerrier (2012), 55–68.Google Scholar

Campbell, G. (ed.) (2014) The Oxford Handbook of Animals in Classical Thought and Life. Oxford.Google Scholar

Canart, P. (1978) “Le livre grec en Italie méridionale sous les règnes Normand et Souabe: aspects matériels et sociaux”, Scrittura e civilta 2: 103–162.Google Scholar

Canart, P. (1982) “La collection hagiographique palimpseste du Palatinus Graecus 205 et la passion de S. Georges BHG 670 g”, AB 100: 87–109.Google Scholar

Candau Morón, J., González Ponce, F., and Chávez Reino, A. (eds.) (2011) Plutarco Transmisor. Seville.Google Scholar

Cannatà Fera, M. (1994) “Plutarco e la Consolatio ad Apollonium”, AncW 25: 171–189.Google Scholar

Cantor, P. (1997) “Shakespeare’s Parallel Lives: Plutarch and the Roman plays”, in McGrail (1997), 69–82.Google Scholar

Carrara, P. (1988) “Plutarco ed Euripide: alcune considerazioni sulle citazioni euripidee in Plutarco (De aud. poet.)”, ICS 13: 447–455.Google Scholar

Carrière, J. C. (1977) “A propos de la Politique de Plutarque”, DHA 3: 237–251.Google Scholar

Carrière, J. C. (ed.) (1984) Plutarque: Oeuvres morales. Vol. XI.2. Paris.Google Scholar

Carrington, D. (1988) Napoleon and His Parents: On the Threshold of History. London.Google Scholar

Cartledge, P. (1990) “Herodotus and ‘the Other:’ a meditation on empire”, EMC/CV 9: 27–40.Google Scholar

Cartledge, P. (1993) The Greeks. Oxford.Google Scholar

Cartledge, P. and Spawforth, A. (2001) Hellenistic and Roman Sparta: A Tale of Two Cities, 2nd ed. New York.Google Scholar

Casanova, A. (2005a) “Il Grillo di Plutarco e Omero”, in Boulogne (2005b), 97–110.Google Scholar

Casanova, A. (2005b) “The time setting of the dialogue Bruta animalia ratione uti”, in Pérez Jiménez and Titchener (2005), 121–132.Google Scholar

Casanova, A. (2006–7) “Il Grillo di Plutarco e la tradizione della figura di Ulisse”, Ploutarchos 4: 19–28.Google Scholar

Casanova, A. (2012) “La giustizia nel Grillo e la conclusione del dialogo”, in Ribeiro Ferreira, Leão, and Martins de Jesus (2012), 181–189.Google Scholar

Casanova, A. (ed.) (2013) Figure d’Atene nelle opere di Plutarco. Florence.Google Scholar

Cassin, B. and J.-L. Labarrière (eds.) (1997) L’animal dans l’antiquité. Paris.Google Scholar

Castelnérac, B. (2007) “The method of ‘eclecticism’ in Plutarch and Seneca”, Hermathena 182: 135–163.Google Scholar

Catanzaro, A. (2013) “Plutarch at Byzantium in XII century: Niketa Choniates and Plutarchean political areté in the Chronikè Diéghesis”, in Pace and Volpe Cacciatore (2013), 111–117.Google Scholar

Cavallo, G. (1980) “La trasmissione scritta della cultura greca antica in Calabria e in Sicilia tra I secoli X–XV”, Scrittura e civilta 4: 157–245.Google Scholar

Cavallo, G. (ed.) (1982) Libri e lettori nel mondo Bizantino: Guida storica e critica. Rome.Google Scholar

Cazals, R. (2001) “Plutarque a-t-il menti?” in Caucanas, S., Cazals, R., and Payen, P. (eds.), Retrouver, imaginer, utiliser l’Antiquité. Toulouse, 141–146.Google Scholar

Champion, C. (2000) “Romans as ΒΑΡΒΑΡΟΙ: three Polybian speeches and the politics of cultural indeterminacy”, CPh 95: 425–444.Google Scholar

Chandezon, C. (2005) Plutarque en sa terre. Diss., Sorbonne University.Google Scholar

Chaniotis, A. (2010) “Illusions of democracy in the Hellenistic world”, Athens Dialogues, November.Google Scholar

Chantraine, P. (1980) Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque. Vol. IV.2. Paris.Google Scholar

Chapman, A. (2011) The Female Principle in Plutarch’s Moralia. Dublin.Google Scholar

Cherchi, P. (1993) “Plutarch’s letter in Mexia’s Silva”, Modern Philology 91: 54–59.Google Scholar

Chernaik, W. (2011) The Myth of Rome in Shakespeare and His Contemporaries. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Cherniss, H. (1954) “The sources of evil according to Plato”, PAPhS 98: 23–30.Google Scholar

Cherniss, H. (ed. and trans.) (1976a) Plutarch’s Moralia. Vol. XIII.1. 999C–1032F. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Cherniss, H. (ed. and trans.) (1976b) Plutarch’s Moralia. Vol. XIII.2. 1033A–1086B. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Cherniss, H. and W. C. Helmbold (eds. and trans.) (1957), Plutarch’s Moralia. Vol. XII. 920A–999B. Cambridge MA.Google Scholar

Chlup, J. (2009) “Crassus as symposiast in Plutarch’s Life of Crassus”, in Ribeiro Ferreira et al. (2009), 181–190.Google Scholar

Chrysanthou, C. (2017) “The proems of Plutarch’s Lives and historiography”, Histos 11: 128–153.Google Scholar

Chrysanthou, C. (2018) Plutarch’s Parallel Lives: Narrative Technique and Moral Judgement. Berlin.Google Scholar

Chrysanthou, C. (2020) “Plutarch and the ‘malicious’ historian”, ICS 45: 49–79.Google Scholar

Clare, L. (1968) “La première traduction en Occident des Vies Parallèles de Plutarque”, BAGB 27: 405–426.Google Scholar

Clare, L. and Jouan, F. (1969) “La plus ancienne traduction occidentale des Vies de Plutarque”, in Actes VIIIe Congrès de l’Association G. Budé. Paris, 567–569.Google Scholar

Clark, G. (2017) “Philosophers’ pets: Porphyry’s partridge and Augustine’s dog”, in Fögen and Thomas (2017), 139–157.Google Scholar

Clarke, D. (1994) “Plutarch’s contribution to the invention of Sabine in Corneille’s Horace”, The Modern Language Review 89.1: 39–49.Google Scholar

Clayton, T. (1983) “‘Should Brutus never taste of Portia’s death but once?’ Text and performance in Julius Caesar”, Studies in English Literature 23: 237–255.Google Scholar

Colonnese, C. (2007) Le scelte di Plutarco: le vite non scritte di greci illustri. Rome.Google Scholar

Connolly, J. (2001) “Problems of the past in imperial Greek education”, in Too, Y. L. (ed.), Education in Greek and Roman Antiquity. Leiden, 339–372.Google Scholar

Connors, S. P. (ed.) (2014) The Politics of Panem: Challenging Genres. Rotterdam.Google Scholar

Conquergood, D. (2007) “Poetics, play, process, and power: the performative turn in anthropology”, in Monaghan, and Goodman, (2007), 38–40.Google Scholar

Constantinidis, C. (1982) Higher Education in Byzantium in the Thirteenth and Early Fourteenth Centuries: 1204–ca 1310. Nicosia.Google Scholar

Cook, A. (1996) “The transmutation of heroic complexity: Plutarch and Shakespeare”, CML 17: 31–43.Google Scholar

Cook, B. (2004) “Plutarch’s ‘many other’ imitable events: Mor. 814b and the statesman’s duty”, in de Blois et al. (2004), 201–210.Google Scholar

Corneille, P. (1965) Writings on the Theatre, ed. Barnwell, H.. Oxford.Google Scholar

Correia Martins, A. I. (2011) “O binomio felicitas vera & falsa nas sentencas de Plutarco no tratado de filosofia moral de Frei Luis de Granada”, in Candau Morón et al. (2011), 533–544.Google Scholar

Coulobaritsis, L. (1986) “La psychologie chez Chrysippe”, Entretiens Hardt 32: 99–142.Google Scholar

Craig, C. (1986) “Cicero’s Stoicism and the understanding of Cicero’s speech for Murena”, TAPhA 116: 229–239.Google Scholar

Crawford, M. (1999) “Amatorius: Plutarch’s Platonic departure from the peri gamou literature”, in Pérez Jiménez, García López, and Aguilar (1999), 287–298.Google Scholar

Cuartero Sancho, M. (1981) Fuentes clásicas de la literatura paremiológica española del siglo XVI. Zaragoza.Google Scholar

Cuvigny, M. (1969) “Plutarque et Épictète”, in Association G. Budé: Actes du VIII^e Congrès (5–10 mai 1968). Paris, 565–566.Google Scholar

Dalby, A. (2000) Empire of Pleasures: Luxury and Indulgence in the Roman World. London.Google Scholar

D’Aubigné, A. (1995) Les Tragiques, ed. Fanlo, J.-R., 2 vols. Paris.Google Scholar

Dauge, Y. A. (1981) Le barbare: Recherches sur la conception romaine de la barbarie et de la civilisation. Brussels.Google Scholar

David-de Palacio, M.-F. (2012) “’L’Anti-Plutarque’: variations Germanique, Américaine et Française entre 1860 et 1925”, in Guerrier (2012), 319–335.Google Scholar

Davies, P. and Mossman, J. (eds.) (forthcoming in 2023) Plutarch and Sparta. Swansea.Google Scholar

de Blois, L. (1992) “The perception of politics in Plutarch’s Roman Lives”, ANRW II.33.6: 4568–4615.Google Scholar

de Blois, L., Bons, J., Kessels, T., and Schenkeveld, D. (eds.) (2004) The Statesman in Plutarch’s Works. Vol. I: Plutarch’s Statesman and His Aftermath: Political, Philosophical, and Literary Aspects. Leiden.Google Scholar

de Blois, L., Bons, J., Kessels, T., and Schenkeveld, D. (2005) The Statesman in Plutarch’s Works. Vol. II: The Statesman in Plutarch’s Greek and Roman Lives. Leiden.Google Scholar

de Fontenay, E. (1997) “La philanthrôpia à l’épreuve des bêtes”, in Cassin, and Labarrière, (1997), 281–298.Google Scholar

de Jesus, C. (2009) “Dancing with Plutarch: dance and dance theory in Plutarch’s Table Talk”, in Ribeiro Ferreira et al. (2009), 403–414.Google Scholar

De Lacy, P. (1952) “Biography and tragedy in Plutarch”, AJPh 73: 159–171.Google Scholar

de Lagarde, P. (ed.) (1882) Iohannis Euchaitorum metropolitae quae in codice Vaticano graeco 676 supersunt. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Delli, E. (2019) “The reception of Plutarch in Michael Psellos’ philosophical, theological and rhetorical works: an elective affinity”, in Xenophontos and Oikonomopoulou (2019), 205–233.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. (1996) Kinds of Minds: Towards an Understanding of Consciousness. London.Google Scholar

Denton, J. (1993) “Wearing a gown in the market place or a toga in the forum: Coriolanus from Plutarch to Shakespeare via renaissance translation”, in Caliumi, G. (ed.), Shakespeare e la sua eredità. Parma, 97–109.Google Scholar

Denton, J. (1997) “Plutarch, Shakespeare, Roman politics and Renaissance translation”, in McGrail (1997), 187–210.Google Scholar

Depew, M. and Obbink, D. (eds.) (2000) Matrixes of Genre: Authors, Canons, and Society. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

De Pourcq, M. and Roskam, G. (2016) “Mirroring virtues in Plutarch’s Lives of Agis, Cleomenes, and the Gracchi”, in De Temmerman and Demoen (2016), 163–180.Google Scholar

de Romilly, J. (1979) La douceur dans la pensée grecque. Paris.Google Scholar

de Romilly, J. (1994–5) “Cruauté barbare et cruautés grecques”, WS 107/108: 187–196.Google Scholar

Desan, P. (ed.) (2007) Dictionnaire de Montaigne. Paris.Google Scholar

Desideri, P. (1985) “Ricchezza e vita politica nel pensiero di Plutarco”, Index 13: 391–405.Google Scholar

Desideri, P. (1986) “La vita politica cittadina nell’impero: lettura dei Praecepta gerendae rei publicae e dell’An seni res publica gerenda sit”, Athenaeum 64: 371–381. Reprinted in Desideri (2012), 111–123.Google Scholar

Desideri, P. (1989) “Teoria e prassi storiografica di Plutarco: una proposta di lettura della coppia Emilio Paolo – Timoleonte”, Maia 41: 199–215. Reprinted in Desideri (2012), 201–218.Google Scholar

Desideri, P. (1991a) “Citazione letteraria e riferimento storico nei ‘Precetti politici’ di Plutarco”, in D’Ippolito and Gallo (1991), 225–233.Google Scholar

Desideri, P. (1991b) “Dione di Prusa fra ellenismo e romanità”, ANRW II.33.5: 3882–3901.Google Scholar

Desideri, P. (1992) “La formazione delle coppie nelle ‘Vite plutarchee’”, ANRW II.33.6: 4470–4486. Reprinted in Desideri (2012), 229–245.Google Scholar

Desideri, P. (1995a) “‘Non scriviamo storie, ma vite’ (Plut., Alex. 1.2): la formula biografica di Plutarco”, Testis Temporum. Aspetti e problemi della storiografia antica. Como, 15–25. Reprinted in Desideri (2012), 219–227.Google Scholar

Desideri, P. (1995b) “Plutarco e Machiavelli”, in Gallo and Scardigli (1995), 107–122. Reprinted in Desideri, (2012), 283–297.Google Scholar

Desideri, P. (2011) “Greek poleis and the Roman Empire: nature and features of political virtues in an autocratic system”, in Roskam and Van der Stockt (2011), 83–98. Reprinted in Desideri (2012), 125–139.Google Scholar

Desideri, P. (2012) Saggi su Plutarco e la sua fortuna, ed. Casanova, A.. Florence.Google Scholar

Desideri, P. (2017) “Plutarch’s Lives”, in Richter and Johnson (2017), 311–326.Google Scholar

Desmond, W. (2008) Cynics. Stocksfield.Google Scholar

De Temmerman, K. (ed.) (2020) The Oxford Handbook of Ancient Biography. Oxford.Google Scholar

De Temmerman, K. and Demoen, K. (eds.) (2016) Writing Biography in Greece and Rome: Narrative Technique and Fictionalization. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Deuse, W. (1983) Untersuchungen zur mittelplatonischen und neuplatonischen Seelenlehre. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Deuse, W. (2010) “Plutarch’s eschatological myths”, in Nesselrath (2010), 169–197.Google Scholar

Díaz Lavado, J. (1996) “Poesía y educación en Plutarco a través del testimonio de ‘De audiendis poetis’”, in y Bereterbide, F. Lisi, Bracero, J. Ureña, and Zoido (eds.), J. Iglesias, Didáctica del Griego y de la cultura clásica: IX Jornadas de Filología Griega (Cáceres, Mayo de 1993). Madrid, 113–120.Google Scholar

Díaz Martínez, E. (2002) “Notas sobre las referencias a Plutarco en la prosa de Quevedo”, Boletín de la Biblioteca de Menéndez Pelayo 78: 69–79.Google Scholar

Dierauer, U. 1977. Tier und Mensch im Denken der Antike. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Dierauer, U. (1997) “Raison ou instinct? Le développement de la zoopsychologie antique”, in Cassin, and Labarrière, (1997), 3–30.Google Scholar

Dihle, A. (1956) Studien zur griechischen Biographie. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Dihle, A. (1994) Die Griechen und die Fremden. Munich.Google Scholar

Dihle, A. (2000) “Ein Streit um die rechte Sokrates-Nachfolge”, in Haltenhoff, A. and Mutschler, F.-H. (eds.), Hortus Litterarum Antiquarum: Festschrift für Hans Armin Gärtner zum 70. Geburtstag. Heidelberg, 93–105.Google Scholar

Diller, A. (1937) “Codices Planudei”, Byzantinische Zeitschrift 37: 295–301.Google Scholar

Diller, A. (1954) “Pletho and Plutarch”, Scriptorium 8: 123–127.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1977) The Middle Platonists: A Study of Platonism 80 B.C. to A.D. 220. London.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1988) “‘Orthodoxy’ and ‘eclecticism’: Middle Platonists and neo-Pythagoreans”, in Dillon, and Long, (1988),103–125.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1996) The Middle Platonists: A Study of Platonism 80 B.C. to A.D. 220. Ithaca, NY (updated edition).Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1997) “Plutarch and the end of history”, in Mossman (1997a), 233–240.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (2002) “Plutarch and god: theodicy and cosmogony in the thought of Plutarch”, in Frede, D. and Laks, A. (eds.), Traditions of Theology: Studies in Hellenistic Theology, Its Background and Aftermath (Philosophia antiqua 89). Leiden, 223–237.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (2008) “Dion and Brutus: philosopher kings adrift in a hostile world”, in Nikolaidis (2008), 351–364. Reprinted in L. J. Trudeau (ed.) (2012) Classical and Medieval Literary Criticism 146: 184–191. Detroit, MI.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (2010) “Aspects de l’exégèse dualiste de Platon par Plutarque”, in Brouillette, and Giavatto, (2010), 65–74.Google Scholar

Dillon, , J. M. and A. A. Long (eds.) (1988) The Question of “Eclecticism”: Studies in Later Greek Philosophy. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

Dimitrova, M. (2019) “Taking centre stage: Plutarch and Shakespeare”, in Xenophontos and Oikonomopoulou (2019), 493–511.Google Scholar

D’Ippolito, G. (1991) “Il Corpus plutarcheo come macrotesto di un progetto antropologico: modi e funzioni della autotestualità”, in D’Ippolito and Gallo (1991), 9–18.Google Scholar

D’Ippolito, G. (1996) “Stilemi ilomorfici nel macrotesto plutarcheo”, in Fernández Delgado, and Pordomingo Pardo, (1996), 17–29.Google Scholar

D’Ippolito, G. (2009) “Plutarco e la lettura nel simposio”, in Ribeiro Ferreira et al. (2009), 113–121.Google Scholar

D’Ippolito, G. and Gallo, I. (eds.) (1991) Strutture formali dei ‘Moralia’ di Plutarco: Atti del III Convegno plutarcheo. Naples.Google Scholar

Di Stefano, G. (1968) La découverte de Plutarque en Occident: aspects de la vie intellectuelle en Avignon au XIVe siècle. Turin.Google Scholar

Ditadi, G. (2000) Plutarco: L’intelligenza degli animali e la giustizia loro dovuta. Este.Google Scholar

Dmitriev, S. (2005) City Government in Hellenistic and Roman Asia Minor. Oxford.Google Scholar

Dodds, E. (1933) “The portrait of a Greek gentleman”, G&R 2: 97–107.Google Scholar

Dognini, C. (2007) “Il De Herodoti malignitate e la fortuna di Erodoto”, in Perrin (ed.), Y., Neronia VII. Rome, l’Italie et la Grèce. Hellénisme et philhellénisme au premier siècle après J.-C. Actes du VIIe Colloque International de la SIEN (Collection Latomus 305). Brussels, 481–502.Google Scholar

Dombrowski, D. (2014) “Philosophical vegetarianism and animal entitlements”, in Campbell (2014), 535–555.Google Scholar

Donahue, J. F. (2003) “Toward a typology of Roman public feasting”, AJPh 124: 423–441.Google Scholar

Donahue, J. F. (2004) The Roman Community at Table during the Principate. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar

Donini, P. (1974) Tre studi sull’ aristotelismo nel II secolo d. C. (Historica, Politica, Philosophica. Il Pensiero Antico). Turin.Google Scholar

Donini, P. (1982) Le scuole, l’anima, l’impero: la filosofia antica da Antioco a Plotino. Turin.Google Scholar

Donini, P. (1986) “Lo scetticismo academico, Aristotele e l’unità della tradizione platonica secondo Plutarco”, in Cambiano (ed.), G., Storiografia e dossografia nella filosofia antica (Biblioteca storico-filosofica, 2). Turin, 203–226.Google Scholar

Donini, P. (1988) “The history of the concept of eclecticism”, in Dillon, and Long, (1988), 15–33.Google Scholar

Donini, P. (1994a) “Plutarco e la rinascita del platonismo”, in Lo spazio letterario della Grecia antica I. Pt. 3. Rome, 35–60.Google Scholar

Donini, P. (1994b) “Testi e commenti, manuali e insegnamento: la forma sistematica e i metodi della filosofia in età postellenistica”, ANRW II.36.7: 5027–5100.Google Scholar

Donini, P. (2002) “L’eredità academica e i fondamenti del platonismo in Plutarco”, in M. Barbanti, G. R. Giardina, and P. Manganaro (eds.), Ἕνωσις καὶ φιλία. Unione e amicizia. Omaggio a Francesco Romano. Catania, 247–273.Google Scholar

Donini, P. (2009) “Il silenzio di Epaminonda, i demoni e il mito: il platonismo di Plutarco nel De genio Socratis”, in Bonazzi, and Opsomer, (2009), 187–214.Google Scholar

Donini, P. (2011) Commentary and Tradition: Aristotelianism, Platonism, and Post-Hellenistic Philosophy (Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca et Byzantina, Quellen und Studien, 4). Berlin.Google Scholar

Döring, K. (1979) Exemplum Socratis: Studien zur Sokratesnachwirkung in der kynisch-stoischen Popularphilosophie der frühen Kaiserzeit und im frühen Christentum. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. (1969) “Le platonisme de Plutarque”, Association Guillaume Budé. Actes du VIIIe congrès (Paris, 5–10 avril 1968), 519–530.Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. (1971) “Die Stellung Plutarchs im Platonismus seiner Zeit”, in Palmer, R. and Hamerton-Kelly (eds.), R., Philomathes: Studies and Essays in the Humanities in Memory of Philip Merlan. The Hague, 36–56.Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. (1983) “Der ‘Weise vom Roten Meer’: Eine Okkulte Offenbarung durch Plutarch als Plagiat entlarvt”, in P. Händel and W. Meid (eds.), Festschrift für Robert Muth. Innsbruck, 95–110.Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. and Baltes, M. (1998) Die philosophische Lehre des Platonismus. Einige grundlegende Axiome/Platonische Physik (im antiken Verständnis). Vol. II. Bausteine, 125–150. Text, Übersetzung, Kommentar. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Dover, K. J. (1997) The Evolution of Greek Prose Style. New York.Google Scholar

Dronkers, A. (1892) De comparationibus et metaphoris apud Plutarchum. Utrecht.Google Scholar

Dryden, J. (1678) All for Love: or, The World Well Lost. London.Google Scholar

Duff, T. E. (1997) “Moral ambiguity in Plutarch’s Lysander–Sulla”, in Mossman (1997a), 169–187.Google Scholar

Duff, T. (1999a) Plutarch’s Lives: Exploring Virtue and Vice. Oxford.Google Scholar

Duff, T. (1999b) “Plutarch, Plato and ‘great natures’”, in Pérez Jiménez, García López, and Aguilar (1999), 313–332.Google Scholar

Duff, T. (2000) “Plutarchan synkrisis: comparisons and contradictions”, in Van der Stockt (2000b), 141–161.Google Scholar

Duff, T. (2001) “The prologue to the Lives of Perikles and Fabius”, in Pérez Jiménez and Casadesús Bordoy (2001), 351–363.Google Scholar

Duff, T. (2003) “Plutarch on the childhood of Alcibiades (Alk. 2–3)”, PCPhS 49: 89–117.Google Scholar

Duff, T. (2004) “Plato, tragedy, the ideal reader and Plutarch’s Demetrios and Antony”, Hermes 132: 271–291.Google Scholar

Duff, T. (2005) Review of Stadter and Van der Stockt (2002), CR 55: 462–465.Google Scholar

Duff, T. (2007–8) “Plutarch’s readers and the moralism of the Lives”, Ploutarchos 5: 3–18.Google Scholar

Duff, T. (2008a) “How Lives begin”, in Nikolaidis (2008), 187–207.Google Scholar

Duff, T. (2008b) “Models of education in Plutarch”, JHS 128: 1–26.Google Scholar

Duff, T. (2008c) “The opening of Plutarch’s Life of Themistokles”, GRBS 48: 159–179.Google Scholar

Duff, T. (2009) “Plato’s Symposium and Plutarch’s Alcibiades”, in Ribeiro Ferreira et al. (2009), 37–50.Google Scholar

Duff, T. (2010a) “Il linguaggio della narrazione in Plutarco”, in Zanetto, G. and Martinelli, S. (eds.), Plutarco: lingua e testa. Milan, 207–224.Google Scholar

Duff, T. (2010b) “Plutarch’s Themistocles and Camillus”, in Humble (2010b), 45–86.Google Scholar

Duff, T. (2011a) “Platonic allusion in Plutarch’s Alcibiades 4–7”, in P. Millet, S. Oakley, and R. Thompson (eds.), Ratio et Res Ipsa: Classical Essays Presented by Former Pupils to James Diggle on His Retirement (PCPhS suppl. vol 36). Cambridge, 27–43.Google Scholar

Duff, T. (2011b) “Plutarch’s Lives and the critical reader”, in Roskam and Van der Stockt (2011), 59–82.Google Scholar

Duff, T. (2011c) “The structure of the Plutarchan book”, ClAnt 30: 213–278.Google Scholar

Duff, T. (2014) “The prologues”, in Beck (2014a), 333–349.Google Scholar

Duff, T. (2015) “Aspect and subordination in Plutarch’s narrative”, in Ash, Mossman, and Titchener (2015), 129–148.Google Scholar

Duff, T. (2017) “Plutarch and tense: the present and imperfect”, in Georgiadou and Oikonomopoulou (2017), 55–66.Google Scholar

Duff, T. (ed.) (forthcoming) Oxford Readings in Ancient Biography. Oxford.Google Scholar

Duff, T. E. and Chrysanthou, C. (eds.) (forthcoming) Generic Enrichment in Plutarch’s Lives. London.Google Scholar

Duff, T. E. and Fletcher, L. E. (eds.) (forthcoming) Herodotus and Plutarch.Google Scholar

Duffy, J. (2006) “Dealing with the Psellos Corpus: from Allatius to Westerink and the Bibliotheca Teubneriana”, in Barbour, C. and Jenkins, D. (eds.), Reading Michael Psellos. Leiden, 1–11.Google Scholar

Dumont, J. (2001) Les animaux dans l’Antiquité grecque. Paris.Google Scholar

Dunbabin, K. (1991) “Triclinium and Stibadium”, in Slater (1991), 121–148.Google Scholar

Dunbabin, K. (1995) “Scenes from the Roman convivium: frigida non derit, non derit calda petenti (Martial XIV.105)”, in Murray and Tecuşan (1995), 252–265.Google Scholar

Dunbabin, K. (2003) The Roman Banquet: Images of Conviviality. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar

Dupont, F. (1989) La vie quotidienne du citoyen romain sous la république, Paris.Google Scholar

Dupont, F. (1992) Daily Life in Ancient Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar

Dupont, F. (1999) “De l’oeuf à la pomme: la cena romaine”, in Flandrin, and Cobbi, (1999), 59–86.Google Scholar

Düring, I. (1957) Aristotle in the Ancient Biographic Tradition. Gothenburg.Google Scholar

Edelman, C. (2019) “Plutarch and Montaigne”, in Xenophontos and Oikonomopoulou (2019), 479–492.Google Scholar

Edwards, C. (1993) The Politics of Immorality in Ancient Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Edwards, G. (2016) “The purpose of Porphyry’s rational animals: a dialectical attack on the Stoics in On Abstinence from Animal Food”, in Sorabji, R. (ed.), Aristotle Re-Interpreted: New Findings on Seven Hundred Years of the Ancient Commentators. London, 263–290.Google Scholar

Ehlers, W. (ed.) (1998) La Biographie antique. (Entretiens Hardt, XLIV). Geneva.Google Scholar

Eichel-Lojkine, P. (2001) Le siècle des grands hommes: les recueils de vies d’hommes illustres au XVIème siècle. Louvain.Google Scholar

Eidinow, J. (1990) “A note on Horace, Epistles 1. 2.26 and 2. 2.75”, CQ 40: 566–568.Google Scholar

Elsmann, T. (1994) Untersuchungen zur Rezeption der Institutio Traiani. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Engberg-Pedersen, T. (1996) “Plutarch to Prince Philopappus on how to tell a flatterer from a friend”, in Fitzgerald, J. (ed.), Friendship, Flattery and Frankness of Speech: Studies on Friendship in the New Testament World. Leiden, 61–79.Google Scholar

Erbse, H. (1956) “Die Bedeutung der Synkrisis in den Parallelbiographien Plutarchs”, Hermes 84: 398–424.Google Scholar

Erikson, E. (1958) Young Man Luther. New York.Google Scholar

Erskine, A. (2001) Troy between Greece and Rome: Local Tradition and Imperial Power. Oxford.Google Scholar

Evans, G. Blakemore (1997) The Riverside Shakespeare, 2nd ed. Boston.Google Scholar

Evans, R. C. (2001) “Flattery in Shakespeare’s Othello: the relevance of Plutarch and Sir Thomas Elyot”, Comparative Drama 35: 1–41.Google Scholar

Fedalto, G. (2007) Simone Atumano: Monaco di Studio, arcivescovo latino di Tebe. Secolo XIV. Brescia.Google Scholar

Fern, ández Delgado, J. A. (2000) “Le Gryllus, une éthopée parodique”, in Van der Stockt (2000b), 171–182.Google Scholar

Fernández Delgado, J. A. and Pardo, F. Pordomingo (eds.) (1996) Estudios sobre Plutarco: Aspectos Formales. Madrid.Google Scholar

Fernoux, H. (2011) Le demos et la cité: communautés et assemblées populaires en Asie Mineure à l’époque impériale. Rennes.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. (1995) Dio, idee e materia: La struttura del cosmo in Plutarco di Cheronea. Naples.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. (1996) “Dio: padre e artefice. La theologia di Plutarco in Plat. Quaest. 2”, in Gallo (1996), 395–409.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. (1998) “Plutarco in Siriano, in Arist. Metaph. 105,36ss.: lo statuto ontologico e la collocazione metafisica delle idee”, in Gallo (1998a), 143–159.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. (2000) “Platonismus und Tradition”, in Erler, M. and Graeser, A. (eds.), Philosophen des Altertums. Darmstadt, 109–127.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. (2002) “La trascendenza razionale: il principio secondo Plutarco”, in Calabi, F. (ed.), Arrhetos Theos: L’ineffabilità del primo principio nel medio platonismo. Pisa, 77–91.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. (2003) “Causa paradigmatica e causa efficiente: il ruolo delle idee nel Timeo”, in Natali, C. and Maso, S. (eds.), Plato physicus: Cosmologia e antropologia nel Timeo. Amsterdam, 83–96.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. (2005) Dottrina delle idee nel medioplatonismo, in Fronterotta, F. and Leszl, W. (eds.), Eidos – Idea. Platone, Aristotele e la tradizione Platonica. Sankt Augustin, 233–247.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. (2007–8) “La chora nel Timeo di Platone: Riflessioni su ‘materia’ e ‘spazio’ nell’ontologia del mondo fenoménico”, Quaestio 7: 3–23.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. and Baldi, L. (eds.) (2002) Plutarco: La generazione dell’anima nel Timeo (CPM 37). Naples.Google Scholar

Fields, D. (2008) “Aristides and Plutarch on self-praise”, in Harris, and Holmes, (2008), 151–172.Google Scholar

Figueira, T. and Nagy, G. (eds.) (1985) Theognis of Megara: Poetry and the Polis. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, W. (2016) Variety: The Life of a Roman Concept. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar

Flacelière, R. (1934) “De pythiae oraculis 409bc”, RPh 8: 56–66.Google Scholar

Flacelière, R. (1936) “Avec Plutarque à Delphes”, BAGB 51: 47.Google Scholar

Flacelière, R. and Chambry, E. (eds.) (1972) Plutarque Vies. Vol. III: Périclès-Fabius Maximus – Alcibiade-Coriolan. Paris.Google Scholar

Flacelière, R., Chambry, E., and Juneaux, M. (eds.) (1964) Plutarque Vies. Vol. 1: Thésée-Romulus – Lycurgue-Numa. Paris.Google Scholar

Flacelière, R., J. Irigoin, J. Sirinelli, and A. Philippon (eds.) (1987) Plutarque. Oeuvres morales. Vol. I.1 (Paris).Google Scholar

Flandrin, J. and J. Cobbi (eds.) (1999) Tables d’hier, tables d'ailleurs: Histoire et ethnologie du repas. Paris.Google Scholar

Fletcher, L. E. (2017) “Narrative time and space in Plutarch’s Life of Nikias”, in Georgiadou and Oikonomopoulou (2017).Google Scholar

Fletcher, L. E. (forthcoming) “History and tragedy in Plutarch’s Nicias”, in Duff and Chrysanthou (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Fletcher, R. and Hanink, J. (eds.) (2016) Creative Lives in Classical Antiquity: Poets, Artists and Biography. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Florio, J. (trans.) (1603) The Essayes or Morall, Politike and Millitarie Discourses of Lord Michaell de Montaigne. London.Google Scholar

Focke, F. (1923) “Synkrisis”, Hermes 58: 327–368.Google Scholar

Fögen, T. (2007) “Antike Zeugnisse zu Kommunikationsformen von Tieren”, A&A 53: 39–75.Google Scholar

Fögen, T. (ed.) (2009a) Tears in the Graeco-Roman World. Berlin.Google Scholar

Fögen, T. (2009b) “The implications of animal nomenclature in Aelian’s De natura animalium”, RhM 152: 49–62.Google Scholar

Fögen, T. (2014) “Animal communication”, in Campbell (2014), 216–232.Google Scholar

Fögen, T. (2017a) “Animals in Greco-Roman antiquity: a select bibliography”, in Fögen and Thomas (2017), 435–474.Google Scholar

Fögen, T. (2017b) “Lives in interaction: animal ‘biographies’ in Graeco-Roman literature?” in Fögen and Thomas (2017), 89–138.Google Scholar

Fögen, T. and Thomas, E. (eds.) (2017) Interactions between Animals and Humans in Graeco-Roman Antiquity. Berlin.Google Scholar

Follet, S. (1972) “Flavius Euphanès d’ Athènes, ami de Plutarque”, in Bader, F. (ed.), Mélanges de linguistique et de philologie grecques offerts à Pierre Chantraine. Paris, 35–50.Google Scholar

Fontanella, F. (2008) “The encomium on Rome as a response to Polybius’ doubts about the Roman Empire”, in Harris, and Holmes, (2008), 203–216.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1984) Histoire de la sexualité. Vol. III: Le souci de soi. Paris.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1990) The History of Sexuality. Vol. III: The Care of the Self. Trans. R. Hurley. London.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (2001) Fearless Speech. Trans. J. Pearson. Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar

Fox, M. (1993) “History and rhetoric in Dionysius of Halicarnassus”, JRS 83: 31–47.Google Scholar

Fraisse, J.-C. (1974) Philia: La notion d’amitié dans la philosophie antique. Paris.Google Scholar

Franco, C. (2017) “Greek and Latin words for human–animal bonds: metaphors and taboos”, in Fögen and Thomas (2017), 39–60.Google Scholar

Frazier, F. (1988) “A propos de la ‘philotimia’ dans les Vies: quelques jalons dans l’histoire d’ une notion”, RPh 62, 109–127.Google Scholar

Frazier, F. (1992) “Contribution à l’étude de la composition des Vies de Plutarque: l’élaboration des grandes scenes”, ANRW II.33.6: 4487–4535.Google Scholar

Frazier, F. (1996) Histoire et Morale dans les Vies parallèles de Plutarque. Paris.Google Scholar

Frazier, F. (1998) “Théorie et pratique de la παιδιά symposiaque dans le Propos de Table de Plutarque”, in Trédé, M. and Hoffmann, P. (eds.), Le Rire des anciens: Actes du Colloque International (Université de Rouen, École normale supérieure, 11–13 janvier 1995). Paris, 281–292.Google Scholar

Frazier, F. (2005) “La ‘prouesse de Camma’ et la fonction des exempla dans le Dialogue Sur l’Amour”, in Pérez Jiménez and Titchener (2005), 197–212.Google Scholar

Frazier, F. (2005–6) “L’Érotikos, un éloge du Dieu Éros? Une relecture du dialogue de Plutarque”, Ploutarchos 3: 63–102.Google Scholar

Frazier, F. (2008a) “Éros, Arès et Aphrodite dans l’Érotikos: Une reconsidération de la réponse à Pemptidès (ch. 13–18)”, in J. Ribeiro Ferreira, L. Van der Stockt, and M. do Céu Fialho (eds.), Philosophy in Society. Virtues and Values in Plutarch. Leuven & Coimbra, 117–136.Google Scholar

Frazier, F. (2008b) “Le Trésor des Morales de Plutarque de François Le Tort”, in Guerrier (2008), 71–86.Google Scholar

Frazier, F. (2008c) “Philosophie et religion dans la pensée de Plutarque: Quelques réflexions autour des emplois du mot πίστις”, Éplaton 5: 41–61.Google Scholar

Frazier, F. (2008d) Plutarque. Érotikos. Dialogue sur l’Amour. Paris.Google Scholar

Frazier, F. (2011) “Autour du miroir: Les miroitements d’une image dans l’oeuvre de Plutarque”, in Roskam and Van der Stockt (2011), 297–326.Google Scholar

Frazier, F. (2014a) “The perils of ambition”, in Beck (2014a), 488–502.Google Scholar

Frazier, F. (2014b) “The reception of Plutarch in France after the Renaissance”, in Beck (2014a), 549–555.Google Scholar

Frazier, F. (2020) Quelques aspects du platonisme de Plutarque. Philosopher en commun, tourner sa pensée vers Dieu. Ed. L. Roig Lanzillotta. (Brill’s Plutarch Studies, vol. 4). Leiden.Google Scholar

Frazier, F. and Guerrier, O. (2019) “Plutarch’s French translation by Amyot”, in Xenophontos and Oikonomopoulou (2019), 421–435.Google Scholar

Frede, M. (1999) “Epilogue”, in Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J., and Schofield, M. (eds.), Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge, 771–797.Google Scholar

French, P. and St Clair, W. (eds.) (2002) Mapping Lives: The Uses of Biography. Oxford.Google Scholar

Froidefond, C. (ed.) (1988) Plutarque: Oeuvres morales. Vol. V.II: Isis et Osiris. Paris.Google Scholar

Fryde, E. (1983) Humanism and Renaissance Historiography. London.Google Scholar

Fryde, E. (1988) “The first humanistic life of Aristotle: the ‘Vita Aristotelis’ of Leonardo Bruni”, in Denley, P. and Elam, C. (eds.), Florence and Italy: Renaissance Studies in Honour of Nicolai Rubinstein. London, 285–296.Google Scholar

Fryde, E. (2000) The Early Palaeologan Renaissance (1261–c.1360). Leiden.Google Scholar

Fuhrmann, F. (1964) Les Images de Plutarque. Paris.Google Scholar

Fuhrmann, F. (ed.) (1972) Plutarque: Oeuvres Morales. Vol. IX.1: Propos de Table (Livres I–III). Paris.Google Scholar

Fuhrmann, F. (ed.) (1978) Plutarque: Oeuvres Morales. Vol. IX.2: Propos de Table (Livres IV–VI). Paris.Google Scholar

Funck, B. (1981) “Studie zu der Bezeichnung bárbaros”, in Welskopf (ed.), E., Soziale Typenbegriffe im alten Griechenland und ihr Fortleben in den Sprachen der Welt. Vol. IV. Berlin, 26–51.Google Scholar

Fuscagni, S. (ed.) (1989) Plutarco Vite Paralle: Cimone (introduzione, traduzione e note di S. Fuscagni), Lucullo (introduzione e note di B. Scardigli; traduzione di B. Mugelli). Milan.Google Scholar

Fyrigos, A. (1989) “Barlaam e Petrarca”, Studi Petrarcheschi 6: 179–200.Google Scholar

Gallarte, I. M. (2008) “El judaísmo en las Vitae y Moralia de Plutarco”, in Nikolaidis (2008), 815–830.Google Scholar

Gallo, I. (ed.) (1988) Sulla tradizione manoscritta dei Moralia di Plutarco. Salerno.Google Scholar

Gallo, I. (ed.) (1992) Plutarco e le scienze. Genoa.Google Scholar

Gallo, I. (ed.) (1996) Plutarco e la religione: Atti del VI Convegno plutarcheo (Ravello, 29–31 maggio, 1995). Naples.Google Scholar

Gallo, I. (ed.) (1998a) L’eredità culturale di Plutarco dall’Antichità al Rinascimento. Naples.Google Scholar

Gallo, I. (1998b) “Forma letteraria nei Moralia di Plutarco: Aspetti e problemi”, ANRW II.34.4: 3511–3540.Google Scholar

Gallo, I. and C. Moreschini (eds.) (2000) I generi letterari in Plutarco. Atti del VIII Convegno plutarcheo, Pisa, 2-4 giugno 1999. Naples.Google Scholar

Gallo, I. and Scardigli, B. (eds.) (1995) Teoria e prassi politica nelle opere di Plutarco: Atti del V Convegno plutarcheo (Certosa di Pontignano, 7–9 giugno 1993). Naples.Google Scholar

García Gual, C. (1988) “Cartas de consuelo al desterrado: Plutarco y fray Antonio de Guevara. Imitación al contraste”, 1616: Annuario de la Socieded Española de Literatura General y Comparada 6–7: 37–41.Google Scholar

García Gual, C. (1991) “Plutarco y Guevara”, in García López and Calderón Dorda (1991), 127–142.Google Scholar

García Gual, C. (1998) “El Plutarco de Fray Antonio de Guevara”, in Gallo (1998a), 367–375.Google Scholar

García Gual, C. (2000) “El Plutarco de Fray Antonio de Guevara”, in Castrillo Benito, N. (ed.), La herencia greco-latina en la lengua y literatura castellanas. Burgos, 67–73.Google Scholar

García López, J. and Calderón Dorda, E. (eds.) (1991) Estudios sobre Plutarco: Paisaje y naturaleza. Madrid.Google Scholar

García Moreno, L. (1995) “Roma y los protagonistas de la dominación romana en Grecia en las Vidas paralelas de Plutarco”, in E. Falque and F. Gascó (eds.), Graecia capta: De la conquista de Grecia a la helenización de Roma. Universidad de Huelva, 129–147.Google Scholar

García Moreno, L. (2002) “Filohelenismo y moderación: Garantías según Plutarco de una dominación estable del mundo griego por Roma”, in Ribeiro Ferreira (2002), 261–280.Google Scholar

García Valdés, M. (ed.) (1994) Estudios sobre Plutarco: ideas religiosas: actas del III simposio internacional sobre Plutarco, Oviedo 30 de abril a 2 de mayo de 1992. Madrid.Google Scholar

Garfagnini, G. (1984) “Lo Studium generale regie civitatis Florentie: 1321–1472 (Antologia di documenti)”, Storia dell’ Ateneo fiorentino: Contributi di studio. Vol. I. Florence, 57-107.Google Scholar

Garzya, A. (1988) “La tradizione manoscritta dei Moralia: linee generali”, in Gallo (1988), 9–54.Google Scholar

Garzya, A. (1998) “Plutarco a Bisanzio”, in Gallo (1998a), 15–27.Google Scholar

Gascó, F. (1990) “Maratón, Eurimedonte y Platea (Praec. ger. reip. 814A–C)”, in Pérez Jiménez and del Cerro Calderón (1990), 211–215.Google Scholar

Gefen, A. (2012) “Les écrivains contre Plutarque: détournements, critiques et réécritures des Vies Parallèles aux XIX^e et XX^e siècles”, in Guerrier (2012), 337–349.Google Scholar

Gehrke, H.-J. (1976) Phokion: Studien zur Erfassung seiner historischen Gestalt. Munich.Google Scholar

Geiger, J. (1979a) “Cornelius Nepos, de regibus exterarum gentium”, Latomus 38: 662–669.Google Scholar

Geiger, J. (1979b) “Munatius Rufus and Thrasea Paetus on Cato the Younger”, Athenaeum 57: 48–72.Google Scholar

Geiger, J. (1981) “Plutarch’s Parallel Lives: the choice of heroes”, Hermes 109: 85–104. Reprinted in Scardigli (1995), 165–190.Google Scholar

Geiger, J. (1985) Cornelius Nepos and Ancient Political Biography. Historia Einzelschriften 47. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Geiger, J. (1999) “Plato, Plutarch, and the death of Socrates and of Cato”, in Pérez Jiménez, García López, and Aguilar (eds.) (1999), 357–364.Google Scholar

Geiger, J. (2017) “Greeks and the Roman past in the Second Sophistic: the case of Plutarch”, in Georgiadou and Oikonomopoulou (2017), 119–125.Google Scholar

Gentili, V. (1991) La Roma antica degli elisabettiani. Bologna.Google Scholar

Georgiadou, A. (1988) “The Lives of the Caesars and Plutarch’s other Lives”, ICS 13: 349–356.Google Scholar

Georgiadou, A. (1997) Plutarch’s Pelopidas: A Historical and Philological Commentary. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Georgiadou, A. (2014) “The Lives of the Caesars”, in Beck (2014a), 251–266.Google Scholar

Georgiadou, A. and Oikonomopoulou, K. (eds.) (2017) Space, Time and Language in Plutarch. Berlin.Google Scholar

Gera, D. (1993) Xenophon’s Cyropaideia: Style, Genre and Literary Technique. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gera, D. (2003) Ancient Greek Ideas on Speech, Language and Civilization. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gera, D. (2007) “Themistocles’ Persian tapestry”, CQ 57: 445–457.Google Scholar

Giannattasio, Andria, R. (2000) “Galba e Otone tra biografia e storia”, in Gallo, and Moreschini, (2000), 81–91.Google Scholar

Giannattasio, A. (2006) “Il proemio del Galba e Otone di Plutarco”, in de Gregorio, G. and Medaglia, S. (eds.), Tradizione, ecdotica, esegesi: miscellanea di studi. Naples, 59–77.Google Scholar

Gigante, M. (1969) Teodoro Metochites, saggio critico su Demostene e Aristide. Milan.Google Scholar

Gigante, M. (1979) Poeti Bizantini di terra d’Otranto nel secolo XIII. Naples.Google Scholar

Gilhus, I. (2006) Animals, Gods and Humans: Changing Attitudes to Animals in Greek, Roman and Early Christian Thought. London.Google Scholar

Gill, C. (1983) “The question of character development: Plutarch and Tacitus”, CQ 33: 469–487.Google Scholar

Gill, C (1985) “Plato and the education of character”, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 67: 1–26.Google Scholar

Gill, C (1986) “The question of character and personality in Greek tragedy”, Poetics Today 7: 251–273.Google Scholar

Gill, C (1988) “Personhood and personality: the four personae theory in Cicero, De officiis I”, OSAPh 5: 169–199.Google Scholar

Gill, C (1990) “The character–personality distinction”, in Pelling (1990c), 1–31.Google Scholar

Gill, C (1996) Personality in Greek Epic, Tragedy, and Philosophy: The Self in Dialogue. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gill, C (2006) The Structured Self in Hellenistic and Roman Thought. Oxford.Google Scholar

Giustiniani, V. (1961) “Sulle traduzioni latine delle ‘Vite’ di Plutarco nel Quattrocento”, Rinascimento 1: 3–62.Google Scholar

Giustiniani, V. (1979) “Plutarch und die Humanistische Ethik”, in Rüegg, W. and Wuttke, D. (eds.), Ethik im Humanismus. Boppard, 45–62.Google Scholar

Gleason, M. (1995) Making Men: Sophists and Self-Presentation in Ancient Rome. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Gleason, M. (2006) “Greek cities under Roman rule”, in Potter (ed.), D., A Companion to the Roman Empire. Oxford, 228–249.Google Scholar

Glucker, J. (1978) Antiochus and the Late Academy (Hypomnemata, 56). Göttingen.Google Scholar

Gnauk, R (1936) Die Bedeutung des Marius und Cato maior für Cicero. Berlin.Google Scholar

Goar, R. (1987) The Legend of Cato Uticensis from the First Century B.C. to the Fifth Century A.D. Brussels.Google Scholar

Goessler, L. (1962) Plutarchs Gedanken über die Ehe. Zürich. English translation of 44–69 in Pomeroy (1999a), 97–115.Google Scholar

Goguey, D. (2003) Les animaux dans la mentalité romain. Brussels.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. (1995) Foucault’s Virginity: Ancient Erotic Fiction and the History of Sexuality. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. (1999) “Body/politics: is there a history of reading?” in Falkner, T., Felson, N., and Konstan, D. (eds.), Contextualising Classics: Ideology, Performance, Dialogue. Essays in Honor of John J. Peradotto. Lanham, MD, 89–20.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. (2001a) “Introduction: setting an agenda – ‘everything is Greece to the wise’”, in Goldhill (2001b), 1–25.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. (ed.) (2001b) Being Greek Under Rome: Cultural Identity, the Second Sophistic and the Development of Empire. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. (2002) “The value of Greek: Why save Plutarch?” in S. Goldhill, Who Needs Greek? Contests in the Cultural History of Hellenism. Cambridge, 246–293.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. (2008) The End of Dialogue in Antiquity. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Goleman, D. (1995) Emotional Intelligence. New York.Google Scholar

Goleman, D. (2001) “What makes a leader?” in W. Rosenbach and R. Taylor (eds.) Contemporary Issues in Leadership, 5th ed. Boulder, CO, 5–18.Google Scholar

Gómez, P. and Mestre, F. (2009) “The banquets of Alexander”, in Ribeiro Ferreira et al. (2009), 211–222.Google Scholar

Gómez Cardó, P., Leão, D., and de Oliveira Silva, M. (eds.) (2014) Plutarco entre mundos: visões de Esparta, Atenas e Roma. Coimbra.Google Scholar

Gomme, A. (1945) A Historical Commentary on Thucydides: Vol. I. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gontier, T. (1999) L’homme et l’animal. La philosophie antique. Paris.Google Scholar

González González, M. (2019) “Who should be sacrificed? Human sacrifice and status in Plutarch: Themistocles 13, Pelopidas 21–22, Philopoemen 21”, Arethusa 52: 165–179.Google Scholar

Görgemanns, H. (2005) “Eros als Gott in Plutarchs Amatorius”, in Hirsch-Luipold (2005), 169–195.Google Scholar

Görgemanns, H. (ed.) (2006) Plutarch: Dialog über die Liebe. Tübingen.Google Scholar

Görgemanns, H. (ed.) (2011) Plutarch: Dialog über die Liebe, 2nd ed. Tübingen.Google Scholar

Gorman, R. and Gorman, V. (2007) “The tryphê of the Sybarites: a historiographical problem in Athenaeus”, JHS 127: 38–60.Google Scholar

Gorman, R. and Gorman, V. (2014) Corrupting Luxury in Ancient Greek Literature. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar

Gossage, A. (1967) “Plutarch”, in Dorey, T. (ed.), Latin Biography. London, 45–77.Google Scholar

Goulet-Cazé, M.-O. (1996) “Religion and the early Cynics”, in Branham and Goulet-Cazé (1996), 47–80.Google Scholar

Gouma-Peterson, T. (ed.) (2000) Anna Komnene and Her Times. New York.Google Scholar

Gowers, E. (1993) The Loaded Table: Representations of Food in Roman Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar

Grassl, H. (1982) “Arrian im Donauraum”, Chiron 12: 245–252.Google Scholar

Graves, W. (1973) “Plutarch’s Life of Cato Utican as a major source of Othello”, Shakespeare Quarterly 24: 181–187.Google Scholar

Gray, V. (1992) “Xenophon’s Symposion: the display of wisdom”, Hermes 120: 58–75.Google Scholar

Gray, V. (1998) The Framing of Socrates: The Literary Interpretation of Xenophon’s Memorabilia. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Graziosi, B. (2002) Inventing Homer. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gréard, O. (1880) De la morale de Plutarque, 3rd ed. Paris.Google Scholar

Green, D. (1979) Plutarch Revisited: A Study of Shakespeare’s Last Roman Plays and Their Source. Salzburg.Google Scholar

Grévin, J. (1971) César, ed. Ginsberg, E.. Geneva.Google Scholar

Gribble, D. (1999) Alcibiades and Athens: A Study in Literary Presentation. Oxford.Google Scholar

Griffin, J. (2009) “Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar and the dramatic tradition”, in Griffin, M. (ed.), A Companion to Julius Caesar. Oxford, 371–398.Google Scholar

Griffith, M. (2006) “Horsepower and donkeywork: equids and the ancient Greek imagination. Part Two”, CPh 101: 307–358.Google Scholar

Griffiths, G., Hankins, J., and Thompson, D. (1987) The Humanism of Leonardo Bruni. Binghamton, NY.Google Scholar

Griffiths, J. G. (ed.) (1970) Plutarch’s De Iside et Osiride. Cardiff.Google Scholar

Griffiths, R. (1970) The Dramatic Technique of Antoine de Montchrestien: Rhetoric and Style in French Renaissance Tragedy. Oxford.Google Scholar

Grimaldi, M. (ed.) (2004) Plutarco: La Malignità di Erodoto. Naples.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. (1992) Culture and National Identity in Republican Rome. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Grünbart, M. (2019) “Plutarch in twelfth-century learned culture”, in Xenophontos and Oikonomopoulou (2019), 265–278.Google Scholar

Guerrier, O. (ed.) (2008) Moralia et Oeuvres Morales à la Renaissance: Actes du Colloque International de Toulouse (19–21 mai 2005). Paris.Google Scholar

Guerrier, O. (ed.) (2012) Plutarque de l’age Classique au XIX^e siècle: presences, interferences et dynamique. Actes du colloque internationale de Toulouse (13–15 mai 2009). Grenoble.Google Scholar

Guerrier, O. (2014) “The Renaissance in France: Amyot and Montaigne”, in Beck (2014a), 544–558.Google Scholar

Guilland, R. (ed.) (1967) Correspondance de Nicéphore Grégoras. Paris.Google Scholar

Guillén Selfa, L. (1997) “Plutarco: moralidad y tragedia”, in Schrader, Ramón, and Vela (1997), 241–253.Google Scholar

Hadot, P. (1992) La citadelle intérieure: Introduction aux Pensées de Marc Aurèle. Paris.Google Scholar

Hadot, P. (1995) Qu’est-ce que la philosophie antique? Paris.Google Scholar

Hägg, T. (2012) The Art of Biography in Antiquity. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Haldon, J. (1990) Byzantium in the Seventh Century: The Transformation of a Culture. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Halfmann, H. (1979) Die Senatoren aus dem östlichen Teil des Imperium Romanum bis zum Ende des 2. Jahrhunderts n.Chr. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Halfmann, H. (2002) “Die Selbstverwaltung der kaiserzeitlichen Polis in Plutarchs Schrift Praecepta gerendae rei publicae”, Chiron 32: 83–95.Google Scholar

Hall, E. (1989) Inventing the Barbarian: Greek Self-Definition through Tragedy. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hall, E. (1993) “Asia unmanned: images of victory in classical Athens”, in Rich and Shipley (1993), 108–133.Google Scholar

Hall, E. (1995) “The ass with the double vision: politicizing an ancient Greek novel”, in Margolies, D. and Joannou (eds.), M., Heart of the Heartless World: Essays in Cultural Resistance in Memory of Margot Heinemann. London, 47–59.Google Scholar

Hall, E. (ed.) (1996) Aeschylus: Persians. Warminster.Google Scholar

Hall, J. (1997) Ethnic Identity in Greek Antiquity. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Halliwell, S. (1990) “Traditional Greek conceptions of character”, in Pelling (1990c), 32–59.Google Scholar

Halliwell, S. (2002) The Aesthetics of Mimesis: Ancient texts and Modern Problems. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Hamilton, C. D. (1992) “Plutarch’s ‘Life of Agesilaus’”, ANRW II. 33.6: 4201–4221.Google Scholar

Hamilton, C. D. (1994) “Plutarch and Xenophon on Agesilaus”, AncW 25: 205–212.Google Scholar

Hamilton, J. (1969) Plutarch, Alexander: A Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hankins, J. (ed.) (2000) Renaissance Civic Humanism: Reappraisals and Reflections. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hankins, J. (2002) “Chrysoloras and the Greek Studies of Leonardo Bruni”, in Maisano, and Rollo, (2002), 175–197.Google Scholar

Hansen, W. (2004) Classical Mythology: A Guide to the Mythical World of the Greeks and Romans. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. (1992) “Plutarch and the interpretation of myth”, ANRW II.33.6: 4743–4787.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. (1996) “Sign language in ‘On the Sign of Socrates’”, in Van der Stockt (1996), 123–136.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. (1997) “Fifth-century Athenian and Augustan images of the barbarian Other”, Classics Ireland 4: 46–56.Google Scholar

Harris, W. (1979) War and Imperialism in Republican Rome 327–70 BC. Oxford.Google Scholar

Harris, W. (2001) Restraining Rage: The Ideology of Anger Control in Classical Antiquity. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Harris, W. V. and Holmes, B. (eds.) (2008) Aelius Aristides between Greece, Rome, and the Gods. Leiden.Google Scholar

Harrison, G. (1991) “The critical trends in scholarship on the non-philosophical works in Plutarch’s Moralia”, ANRW II.33.6: 4646–4681.Google Scholar

Harrison, G. (1995) “The semiotics of Plutarch’s Σύγκρισις: the Hellenistic lives of Demetrius – Antony and Agesilaus – Pompey”, RBPhH 73: 91–104.Google Scholar

Harrison, G. (2000) “Problems with the genre of problems: Plutarch’s literary innovations”, CPh 95: 193–199.Google Scholar

Harrison, T. (ed.) (2002) Greeks and Barbarians. Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Hartog, F. (2005) Anciens, Modernes, Sauvages. Paris.Google Scholar

Harvey, D. (1999) “Bibliography of Plutarch’s Advice and Consolation”, in Pomeroy (1999a), 197–215.Google Scholar

Hastings, M. (2009) Finest Years: Churchill as Warlord 1940–45. London.Google Scholar

Hawtree, L. (2014) “Animals in epic”, in Campbell (2014), 73–83.Google Scholar

Heath, J. (2005) The Talking Greeks: Speech, Animals, and the Other in Homer, Aeschylus, and Plato. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Heath, M. (1998) “Caecilius, Longinus and Photius”, GRBS 39: 271–292.Google Scholar

Heath, M. (2008) “Aristotle on natural slavery”, Phronesis 53: 243–270.Google Scholar

Hein, A. (1914) De optativi apud Plutarchum usu. Trebnitz.Google Scholar

Helmbold, W. (ed. and trans.) (1939) Plutarch’s Moralia. Vol. VI. 439A–523B. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Helmbold, W. and O’Neil, E. (1959) Plutarch’s Quotations. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar

Helmig, C. (2008) “Plutarch of Chaeronea and Porphyry on transmigration – who is the author of Stobaeus I 445.14–448.3 (W.-H)?” CQ 58: 250–255.Google Scholar

Herchenroeder, L. (2008) “Τί γὰρ τοῦτο πρὸς τὸν λόγον; Plutarch’s Gryllus and the so-called grylloi”, AJPh 129: 347–379.Google Scholar

Herrero Salgado, F. (1994) “Plutarco y la oratoria sagrada del siglo de oro,” in García Valdés, (1994),371–380.Google Scholar

Hershbell, J. (1987) “Plutarch’s de animae procreatione in Timaeo: an analysis of structure and content”, ANRW II.36.1: 234–247.Google Scholar

Hershbell, J. (1988) “Plutarch’s portrait of Socrates”, ICS 13: 365–381.Google Scholar

Hershbell, J. (1992a) “Plutarch and Epicureanism”, ANRW II.36.5: 3353–3383.Google Scholar

Hershbell, J. (1992b) “Plutarch and Stoicism”, ANRW II. 36.5: 3336–3352.Google Scholar

Hershbell, J. (1993) “Plutarch and Herodotus: the beetle in the rose”, RhM 136: 143–163.Google Scholar

Hershbell, J. (2004) “Plutarch’s political philosophy: Peripatetic and Platonic”, in de Blois et al. (2004), 151–162.Google Scholar

Heuer, H. (1957) “From Plutarch to Shakespeare: a study of Coriolanus”, Shakespeare Survey 10: 50–59.Google Scholar

Hijmans, B. Jr., Van der Paardt, R., Schmidt, V., Wesseling, B., and Zimmerman, M. (eds.) (1995) Apuleius Madaurensis. Metamorphoses Book IX: Text, Introduction and Commentary. Groningen.Google Scholar

Hillman, T. (1993) “When did Lucullus retire?” Historia 42: 211–228.Google Scholar

Hillman, T. (1994) “Authorial statements, narrative, and character in Plutarch’s Agesilaus – Pompeius”, GRBS 35: 255–280.Google Scholar

Hillyard, B. (1977) “The medieval tradition of Plutarch, de audiendo”, RHT 7: 1–56.Google Scholar

Hindermann, J. (2011) “Zoophilie in Zoologie und Roman: Sex und Liebe zwischen Mensch und Tier bei Plutarch, Plinius dem Älteren, Aelian und Apuleius”, Dictynna 8. https://doi.org/10.4000/dictynna.717.Google Scholar

Hirsch-Luipold, R. (ed.) (2005) Gott und die Götter bei Plutarch: Götterbilder – Gottesbilder – Weltbilder. Berlin.Google Scholar

Hirsch-Luipold, R. (2014) “Religion and myth”, in Beck (2014a), 163–176.Google Scholar

Hirzel, R. (1895) Der Dialog. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Hirzel, R. (1912) Plutarch. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Hobbs, A. (2000) Plato and the Hero: Courage, Manliness and the Impersonal Good. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hobden, F. (2004) “How to be a good symposiast and other lessons from Xenophon’s Symposium”, The Cambridge Classical Journal 50: 121–140.Google Scholar

Hobden, F. (2005) “Reading Xenophon’s Symposium”, Ramus 34.2: 93–111.Google Scholar

Hobden, F. (2013) The Symposion in Ancient Greek Society and Thought. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Høgel, C. (2002) Symeon Metaphrastes: Rewriting and Canonization. Copenhagen.Google Scholar

Höistad, R. (1948) Cynic Hero and Cynic King: Studies in the Cynic Conception of Man. Uppsala.Google Scholar

Holford-Strevens, L. (2003) Aulus Gellius. An Antonine Scholar and His Achievement. Oxford.Google Scholar

Holland, P. (1603) The Philosophie, commonlie called, The Morals […]. London.Google Scholar

Holmes, B. (2008) “Aelius Aristides’ illegible body,” in Harris, and Holmes, (2008), 81–114.Google Scholar

Holtorf, H. (1913) Plutarchi Chaeronensis studia in Platone explicando posita. Diss., University of Greifswald.Google Scholar

Honigmann, E. (1959) “Shakespeare’s Plutarch”, Shakespeare Quarterly 10: 25–33.Google Scholar

Hood, D. (1967) Plutarch and the Persians. Ph.D. diss., University of Southern California.Google Scholar

Hopfner, T. (1940) Plutarch über Isis und Osiris. Darmstadt.Google Scholar

Horky, P. (2017) “The spectrum of animal rationality in Plutarch”, Apeiron 50: 103–133.Google Scholar

Horster, M. and Reitz, C. (eds.) (2010) Condensing Texts – Condensed Texts. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Howard-Johnson, J. (1996) “Anna Komnene and the Alexiad”, in Mullett, M. and Smythe, D. (eds.), Alexios I Komnenos. Belfast, 260–301.Google Scholar

Howley, J. (2014) “Heus tu rhetorisce: Gellius, Cicero, Plutarch and Roman study abroad”, in Madsen, J. M. and Rees (eds.), R., Roman Rule in Greek and Latin Writing: Double Vision. Leiden, 163–192.Google Scholar

Hult, K. (ed.) (2002) Theodore Metochites on Ancient Authors and Philosophy: Semeioseis Gnomikai 1–26, 71. Gothenburg.Google Scholar

Humble, N. (2010a) “Parallelism and the humanists”, in Humble (2010b), 237–265.Google Scholar

Humble, N. (2010b) Plutarch’s Lives: Parallelism and Purpose. London.Google Scholar

Humble, N. (2013) “Imitation as commentary? Plutarch and Byzantine historiography in the tenth century”, in Pace and Volpe Cacciatore (2013), 219–225.Google Scholar

Hunger, H. (1969–70) “On the imitation (ΜΙΜΗΣΙΣ) of antiquity in Byzantine literature”, Dumbarton Oaks Papers 23: 15–38.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. (2018) The Measure of Homer: The Ancient Reception of the Iliad and the Odyssey. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. and Russell, D. (eds.) (201) Plutarch: How to Study Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, G. (2018) Plutarch’s Rhythmic Prose. Oxford.Google Scholar

Ianziti, G. (2016) “Pier Candido Decembrio and the Suetonian path to princely biography”, in Baker, et al. (2016), 237–270.Google Scholar

Iglesias Montiel, R. (1991) “La recepción de Plutarco en el Comentario de De la Cerda a las Geórgicas de Virgilio”, in García López and Calderón Dorda (1991), 173–182.Google Scholar

Immerwahr, H. (1960) “Ergon: history as a monument in Herodotus and Thucydides”, AJPh 81: 261–290.Google Scholar

Indelli, G. (1992) “Plutarco, Bruta animalia ratione uti: qualche riflessione”, in Gallo, (1992), 317–352.Google Scholar

Indelli, G. (ed.) (1995) Plutarco. Le Bestie sono esseri razionali. Naples.Google Scholar

Ingenkamp, H. G. (1971) Plutarchs Schriften über die Heilung der Seele (Hypomnemata 34). Göttingen.Google Scholar

Ingenkamp, H. G. (1999) “Ou psegetai to pinein. Wie Plutarch den übermässigen Weingenuss beurteilte”, in Montes Cala et al. (1999), 277–290.Google Scholar

Ingenkamp, H. G. (2016) “De Plutarchi malignitate”, in Opsomer, Roskam, and Titchener (2016), 249–242.Google Scholar

Inglese, L. (2003) “Aspetti della fortuna di Erodoto in Plutarco”, RCCM 45: 221–244.Google Scholar

Innes, D., Hine, H., and Pelling, C. (eds.) (1995) Ethics and Rhetoric: Classical Essays for Donald Russell on His Seventy-Fifth Birthday. Oxford.Google Scholar

Inwood, B. (ed.) (2003) The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Irigoin, J. (1976) “Les manuscrits de Plutarque à 32 lignes et à 22 lignes”, in Actes du XIVe Congres International des Etudes Byzantins, Bucarest, 6–12 Septembre 1971. Bucharest, 83–87.Google Scholar

Irigoin, J. (1982–3) “La formation d’un corpus: Un probleme d’histoire des textes dans la tradition des Vies paralleles de Plutarque”, RHT 12–13: 1–13.Google Scholar

Irigoin, J. (1986) “Le catalogue de Lamprias: tradition manuscrite et éditions imprimées”, REG 99: 318–331.Google Scholar

Irigoin, J. (1987) “II. Histoire du texte des Oeuvres Morales de Plutarque,” in Flacelière et al. (1987), ccxxvii–cccx.Google Scholar

Irwin, E. (2006) “The biographies of poets: the case of Solon,” in McGing and Mossman (2006), 13–30.Google Scholar

Isaac, B. (2004) The Invention of Racism in Classical Antiquity. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Isaacson, W. (ed.) (2010) Profiles in Leadership: Historians on the Elusive Quality of Greatness. New York.Google Scholar

Jacob, C. (2013) The Web of Athenaeus. Trans. A. Papaconstantinou. Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Jacobs, S. (2018) Plutarch’s Pragmatic Biographies: Lessons for Statesmen and Generals in the Parallel Lives. Leiden.Google Scholar

Jacquemin, A. (1991) “Delphes au II^e siècle après J.-C.: un lieu de mémoire grecque”, in Saïd, S. (ed.), Ellēnismos: quelques jalons pour une histoire de l’identité grecque. Leiden, 217–231.Google Scholar

Jaeger, W. (1945) Paideia: The Ideals of Greek Culture. Vol. I. Oxford.Google Scholar

Jazdzewska, K. (2009–10) “‘Not an innocent spectacle’: hunting and venationes in Plutarch’s De sollertia animalium”, Ploutarchos 7: 35–46.Google Scholar

Jazdzewska, K. (2013) “A skeleton at a banquet: death in Plutarch’s Convivium Septem Sapientium”, Phoenix 67: 301–319.Google Scholar

Jazdzewska, K. (2015a) “Dialogic format of Philo of Alexandria’s De animalibus”, Eos 102: 45–56.Google Scholar

Jazdzewska, K. (2015b) “Tales of two lives in Xenophon’s ‘Hiero,’ Plutarch’s ‘Gryllos,’ and Lucian’s ‘Cock’”, Hermes 143: 141–152.Google Scholar

Jazdzewska, K. (2016) “Laughter in Plutarch’s Convivium Septem Sapientium”, CPh 111: 74–88.Google Scholar

Jehne, M. (1999) “Cato und die Bewahrung der traditionellen res publica. Zum Spannungsverhältnis zwischen mos maiorum und griechischer Kultur im zweiten Jahrhundert v.Chr.”, in Vogt-Spira, G. and Rommel, B. (eds.), Rezeption und Identität. Die kulturelle Auseinandersetzung Roms mit Griechenland als europäisches Paradigma. Stuttgart, 115–134.Google Scholar

Jenkins, R. (1948) “Constantine VII’s portrait of Michael III”, BAB 34.5: 71–77.Google Scholar

Jenkins, R. (1954) “The classical background of the Scriptores Post Theophanem”, Dumbarton Oaks Papers 8: 11–30.Google Scholar

Jenkins, R. (1963) “The Hellenistic origins of Byzantine literature”, Dumbarton Oaks Papers 17: 37–52.Google Scholar

Jennings, V. and Katsaros, A. (eds.) (2007) The World of Ion of Chios. Leiden.Google Scholar

Jones, C. (1966) “Towards a chronology of Plutarch’s works”, JRS 56: 61–74. Reprinted in Scardigli (1995), 95–123.Google Scholar

Jones, C. (1967) “The teacher of Plutarch”, HSPh 71: 205–213.Google Scholar

Jones, C. (1970) “Sura and Senecio”, JRS 60: 98–104.Google Scholar

Jones, C. (1971) Plutarch and Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar

Jones, C. (1974) Review of Russell (1973a), JRS 64: 279–280.Google Scholar

Jones, C. (1978) The Roman World of Dio Chrysostom. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Jones, C. (2004) “Multiple identities in the age of the Second Sophistic”, in Borg (ed.), B., Paideia: The World of the Second Sophistic. Berlin, 13–21.Google Scholar

Jones, R. (1980) The Platonism of Plutarch and Selected Papers (Ancient Philosophy. Editions, Commentaries, Critical Works), with an Introduction by L. Tarán. New York. [Reprint of the author’s thesis, University of Chicago, 1913, originally published in 1916 by G. Banta Pub. Co.]Google Scholar

Jouan, F. (2001) “Quelques réflexions sur Plutarque et la tragédie”, SIFC 95: 186–196.Google Scholar

Jouanna, J., Villard, L., and Béguin, D., D. (eds.) (2002) Vin et santé en Grèce ancienne (Actes du colloque organisé à l’Université de Rouen et à Paris). Paris.Google Scholar

Jouët-Pastré, E. (2002) “Vin, remède et jeu dans les Lois de Platon”, in Jouanna, Villard, and Béguin (2002), 222–232.Google Scholar

Jufresa, M. (1996) “La abstinencia de carne y el origen de la civilización en Plutarco”, in Fernández Delgado and Pordomingo Pardo (1996), 219–226.Google Scholar

Jufresa, M., Mestre, F., Gómez, P., and Gilabert, P. (eds.) (2005) Plutarc a la seva època: paideia i societat (Actas del VIII Simposio Internacional de la Sociedad Española de Plutarquistas, Barcelona, 6–8 nov. 2003). Barcelona.Google Scholar

Jufresa Muñoz, M. (2007) “El amor de los animales en las Vidas Paralelas de Plutarco”, in Nieto Ibáñez and López López (2007), 265–277.Google Scholar

Jung, M. (2006) Marathon und Plataiai: Zwei Perserschlachten als leux de memoire im antiken Griechenland. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Jüthner, J. (1923) Hellenen und Barbaren. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Kahle, M. (2017a) “Giannozzo Manetti: on famous men of great age, ‘Life of Socrates’”, in Baker, (2017), 59–65.Google Scholar

Kahle, M. (2017b) “Spoliating Diogenes Laertius: Gianozzo Manetti’s use(s) of the lives of the philosophers”, in Baker (2017), 38–89.Google Scholar

Kaldellis, A. (1999) The Argument of Psellos’ Chronographia. Leiden.Google Scholar

Kaldellis, A. (2007) Hellenism in Byzantium: The Transformation of Greek Identity and the Reception of the Classical Tradition. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kalimtzis, K. (2012) Taming Anger: The Hellenic Approach to the Limitations of Reason. London.Google Scholar

Kammer, U. (1964) Untersuchungen zu Ciceros Bild von Cato Censorius. Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Karamanolis, G. (2006) Plato and Aristotle in Agreement? Platonists on Aristotle from Antiochus to Porphyry. Oxford.Google Scholar

Karpozilos, A. (ed.) (1990) The Letters of Ioannes Mauropous Metropolitan of Euchaita. Thessalonica.Google Scholar

Kassel, R. (1958) Untersuchungen zur griechischen und römischen Konsolationsliteratur. Munich.Google Scholar

Kasulke, C. (2000) “Hadrian und die Jagd im Spiegel der zeitgenössischen Literatur”, in Martini, W. (ed.), Die Jagd der Eliten in den Erinnerungskulturen von der Antike bis in die Frühe Neuzeit. Göttingen, 101–127.Google Scholar

Kazhdan, A. (ed.) (1991) The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium. Oxford.Google Scholar

Kazhdan, A. (2006) A History of Byzantine Literature (850–1000), ed. Angelidi, C.. Athens.Google Scholar

Kazhdan, A. and Wharton Epstein, A. (1985) Change in Byzantine Culture in the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

Keaveney, A. (1992) Lucullus: A Life. London.Google Scholar

Kechagia, E. (2011a) “Philosophy in Plutarch’s Table Talk: in jest or in earnest?” in Klotz and Oikonomopoulou (2011a), 77–104.Google Scholar

Kechagia, E. (2011b) Plutarch Against Colotes: A Lesson in History of Philosophy. Oxford.Google Scholar

Kechagia-Ovseiko, E. (2014) “Plutarch and Epicureanism”, in Beck (2014a), 104–120.Google Scholar

Keller, A. (1939) “Plutarch and Rousseau’s first Discours”, Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 54.1: 212–222.Google Scholar

Kemezis, A. (2016) “‘Inglorius labor? The rhetoric of glory and utility in Plutarch’s Precepts and Tacitus’ Agricola”, CW 110: 87–117.Google Scholar

Kennedy, G. (1972) The Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Kennell, N. (1995) The Gymnasium of Virtue: Education and Culture in Ancient Sparta. Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar

Kessler, E. (1968) Das Problem des frühen Humanismus; seine philosophische Bedeutung bei Coluccio Salutati. Munich.Google Scholar

Kidd, I. (1992) “Introduction” and notes to R. Waterfield (trans.) and Kidd, I. (ed.), Plutarch: Essays. London.Google Scholar

Kienast, D. (1964) “Die Homonoiaverträge in der römischen Kaiserzeit”, JNG 14: 51–64.Google Scholar

Kim, L. (2009) “Historical fiction, brachylogy, and Plutarch’s Banquet of the Seven Sages”, in Ribeiro Ferreira et al. (2009), 481–495.Google Scholar

Kim, L. (2010) “The literary heritage as language: Atticism and the Second Sophistic”, in Bakker, (2010), 468–482.Google Scholar

Kim, L. (2017) “Atticism and Asianism”, in Richter and Johnson (2017), 41–66.Google Scholar

King, C. (trans.) (1908) Plutarch’s Morals: Theosophical Essays. London.Google Scholar

Kingston, R. (2022) Plutarch’s Prism. Classical Reception and Public Humanism in France and England, 1500–1800. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kirk, A. (2017) “Λόγος and φωνή in Odyssey 10 and Plutarch’s Gryllus”, in Slater, N. (ed.), Voice and Voices in Antiquity. Leiden, 397–415.Google Scholar

Kirkland, N. B. (2019) “The character of tradition in Plutarch’s On the Malice of Herodotus”, AJPh 140: 477–511.Google Scholar

Kitchell, K. (2017) “Animal literacy and the Greeks: Philoctetes the Hedgehog and Dolon the Weasel”, in Fögen and Thomas (2017), 183–203.Google Scholar

Kleczkowska, K. (2014) “Those who cannot speak: animals as others in ancient Greek thought”, Maska 24: 97–108.Google Scholar

Kloft, H. and Kerner, M. (1992) Die Institutio Traiani: Ein pseudo-plutarchischer Text im Mittelalter. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Klotz, F. (2007) “Portraits of the philosopher: Plutarch’s self-presentation in the Quaestiones Convivales”, CQ 57: 650–667.Google Scholar

Klotz, F. (2011) “Imagining the past: Plutarch’s play with time”, in Klotz and Oikonomopoulou (2011a), 161–178.Google Scholar

Klotz, F. (2014) “The sympotic works”, in Beck (2014a), 207–222.Google Scholar

Klotz, F. and Oikonomopoulou, K. (eds.) (2011a) The Philosopher’s Banquet: Plutarch’s Table Talk in the Intellectual Culture of the Roman Empire. Oxford.Google Scholar

Klotz, F. and Oikonomopoulou, K. (eds.) (2011b) “Introduction”, in Klotz and Oikonomopoulou (2011a), 1–31.Google Scholar

Klotz, F. and Oikonomopoulou, K. (eds.) (2011c) “Conclusion: reading (from) the Table Talk in Aulus Gellius’ Attic Nights”, in Klotz and Oikonomopoulou (2011a), 233–237.Google Scholar

Kneebone, E. (2008) “Τόσσ’ ἐδάην: the poetics of knowledge in Oppian’s Halieutica”, Ramus 37: 32–59.Google Scholar

Kneebone, E. (2017) “The limits of enquiry in imperial Greek didactic poetry”, in König, J. and Woolf (eds.), G., Authority and Expertise in Ancient Scientific Culture. Cambridge, 203–230.Google Scholar

Knight, G. W. (1965) The Imperial Theme: Further Interpretations of Shakespeare’s Tragedies Including the Roman Plays. London.Google Scholar

Knight, R. (1991) Corneille’s Tragedies: The Role of the Unexpected. Cardiff.Google Scholar

Knox, B. (1964) The Heroic Temper: Studies in Sophoclean Tragedy. Sather Classical Lectures, vol. 35. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

König, J. (2005) Athletics and Literature in the Roman Empire. Cambridge.Google Scholar

König, J. (2007) “Fragmentation and coherence in Plutarch’s Sympotic Questions”, in König, J. and Whitmarsh, T. (eds.), Ordering Knowledge in the Roman World. Cambridge, 43–68.Google Scholar

König, J. (2010) “Conversational and citational brevity in Plutarch’s Sympotic Questions,” in Horster and Reitz (2010), 321–348.Google Scholar

König, J. (2012) Saints and Symposiasts: The Literature of Food and the Symposium in Graeco-Roman and Early Christian Culture. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Konrad, C. (1994) Plutarch’s Sertorius: A Historical Commentary. Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar

Konstan, D. (1994) Sexual Symmetry: Love in the Ancient Novel and Related Genres. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Konstan, D. (2004) “The birth of the reader: Plutarch as a literary critic”, Scholia 13: 3–27.Google Scholar

Konstan, D. (2005) “The pleasures of the ancient text or the pleasure of poetry from Plato to Plutarch”, in Cairns, F. (ed.), Greek and Roman Poetry: Greek and Roman Historiography. Cambridge, 1–17.Google Scholar

Konstan, D. (2006) “The active reader in classical antiquity”, Argos 30: 7–18.Google Scholar

Konstan, D. and S. Saïd, (2010–11) “A pig convicts itself of unreason: the implicit argument of Plutarch’s Gryllus”, Hyperboreus 16/17: 371–385.Google Scholar

Konstan, D. and S. Saïd, (eds.) (2006) Greeks on Greekness: Viewing the Greek past under the Roman Empire. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Konstantinovic, I. (1989) Montaigne et Plutarque. Geneva.Google Scholar

Korhonen, T. (2012) “On human–animal sexual relationships in Aelian’s De natura animalium”, Arctos 46: 65–77.Google Scholar

Korhonen, T. and Ruonakoski, E. (2017) Human and Animal in Ancient Greece: Empathy and Encounter in Classical Literature. London.Google Scholar

Kowalski, G. (1918) De Plutarchi scriptorum iuvenilium colore rhetorico. Krakow.Google Scholar

Krappe, A. (1933) “Solomon and Ashmodai”, AJPh: 260–268.Google Scholar

Kraus, C. (ed.) (1999) The Limits of Historiography: Genre and Narrative in Ancient Historical Texts. Leiden.Google Scholar

Krauss, F. (1912) Die rhetorischen Schriften Plutarchs. Nuremberg.Google Scholar

Labarrière, J.-L. (1997) “Logos endiathetos et logos prophorikos dans la polémique entre le Portique et la Nouvelle Académie”, in Cassin, and Labarrière, (1997), 259–280.Google Scholar

Lachenaud, G. (ed.) (1993) Plutarque: Oeuvres Morales. Vol. XII. Paris.Google Scholar

La Font de Saint-Yenne, É. (1754) Sentimens sur quelques ouvrages de peinture, sculpture et gravure. Paris.Google Scholar

La Matina, M. (1998) “Plutarco negli autori cristiani greci”, in Gallo (1998a), 81–110.Google Scholar

Laird, A. (ed.) (2006) Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Ancient Literary Criticism. Oxford.Google Scholar

Lakmann, M.-L. (1995) Der Platoniker Tauros in der Darstellung des Aulus Gellius. Leiden.Google Scholar

Laks, A. (2016) “The continuation of philosophy by other means?” in Weisser and Thaler (2016), 16–30.Google Scholar

Lamberton, R. (2001) Plutarch. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar

Larmour, D. (1992) “Making parallels: ‘synkrisis’ and Plutarch’s Themistocles and Camillus”, ANRW II.33.6: 4154–4200.Google Scholar

Larmour, D. (2014) “The synkrisis”, in Beck (2014a), 405–416.Google Scholar

Larmour, D. and Spencer, D. (eds.) (2007) The Sites of Rome: Time Space, Memory. Oxford.Google Scholar

Lather, A. (2017) “Taking pleasure seriously: Plutarch on the benefits of poetry and philosophy”, CW 110.3: 323–349.Google Scholar

Laurenti, R. and Indelli, G. (eds.) (1988) Plutarco: Sul controllo dell’ira (CPM 2). Naples.Google Scholar

Lauritzen, F. (2005) The Depiction of Character in the Chronographia of Michael Psellos. Diss., Columbia University.Google Scholar

Lavoine, S. (1986) “L’influence du Plutarque d’Amyot sur la tragédie française du XVI^e siècle”, in Balard (1986), 273–283.Google Scholar

Law, R. A. (1943) “The Roman background of Titus Andronicus”, Studies in Philology 40: 145–153.Google Scholar

Lee, H. (2009) Biography: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford.Google Scholar

Leeck, C. (2010) Das Bild Roms in Plutarchs Römerbiographien. Schmeichelei oder ernsthafte Völkerverständigung? Marburg.Google Scholar

Lefkowitz, J. (2014) “Aesop and animal fable”, in Campbell (2014), 1–23.Google Scholar

Lefkowitz, M. (1981) The Lives of the Greek Poets. London.Google Scholar

Lefkowitz, M. (2012) The Lives of the Greek Poets (2nd ed.). London.Google Scholar

Legros, A. (2008) “Plutarque, Amyot, Montaigne et la ‘superstition’”, in Guerrier (2008), 275–291.Google Scholar

Lemerle, P. (1986) Byzantine Humanism: The First Phase. Trans. H. Lindsay and A. Moffatt. Canberra (French original 1971).Google Scholar

Lenfant, D. (2003) “De l’usage des comiques comme source historique: les Vies de Plutarque et la Comédie Ancienne”, in Lachenaud, G. and Longrée, D. (eds.), Grecs et Romains aux prises avec l’histoire: Représentations, récits et idéologies, vol. 2. Rennes, 391–314.Google Scholar

Lenfant, D. (2007) “On Persian tryphē in Athenaeus”, in Tuplin, C. (ed.), Persian Responses: Political and Cultural Interaction with(in) the Achaemenid Empire. Swansea, 51–65.Google Scholar

Leo, F. (1901) Die griechische-römische Biographie nach ihrer litterarischen Form. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Leone, P. (ed.) (1991) Maximi Monachi Planudis Epistulae. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Lerouge, C. (2007) L’Image des Parthes dans le monde gréco-romain. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Lévy, E. (1984) “Naissance du concept de barbare”, Ktema 9: 5–14.Google Scholar

Lewis, R. (1991) “Suetonius’ ‘Caesares’ and their literary antecedents”, ANRW II. 33.5: 3623–3674.Google Scholar

Lhermitte, J.-F. (2015) L’animal vertueux dans la philosophie antique à l’époque imperiale. Paris.Google Scholar

Li Causi, P. (2009–10) “Strange animals: extremely interspecific hybridization (and anthropopoiesis) in Plutarch”, Ploutarchos 7: 47–60.Google Scholar

Li Causi, P. (2010) “Granchi, uomini e altri animali. La genesi della violenza nel De sollertia animalium di Plutarco”, in Andò, V. and Cusumano, N. (eds.), Come bestie? Forme a paradossi della violenza tra mondo antico e disagio contemporaneo. Caltanissetta, 189–208.Google Scholar

Licona, M. (2017) Why Are There Differences in the Gospels? What We Can Learn from Ancient Biography. Oxford.Google Scholar

Liebert, H. (2016) Plutarch’s Politics: Between City and Empire. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Littlewood, A. (ed.) (1985) Michael Psellus: Oratoria Minora. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Ljubarskij, J. (1993) “New trends in the study of Byzantine historiography”, Dumbarton Oaks Papers 47: 131–138.Google Scholar

Ljubarskij, J. (2000) “Why is the Alexeid a masterpiece of Byzantine literature?” in Gouma-Peterson (2000), 169–185.Google Scholar

Ljubarskij, J. et al. (1998) “Quellenforschung and/or literary criticism: narrative structures in Byzantine historical writings,” SO 73: 5–73.Google Scholar

George, Lloyd, R. (2016) A Modern Plutarch: Comparisons of the Most Influential Modern Statesmen. New York.Google Scholar

Lo Cascio, E. (2007) “Le città dell’impero e le loro élites nella testimonianza di Plutarco”, in Volpe Cacciatore and Ferrari (2007), 171–186.Google Scholar

Lomas, K. and Cornell, T. (eds.) (2003) “Bread and Circuses”: Euergetism and Municipal Patronage in Roman Italy. London.Google Scholar

Long, A. (1988) “Socrates in Hellenistic philosophy”, CQ 38: 150–117.Google Scholar

Long, A. (1996) Stoic Studies. Cambridge.Google Scholar

López Férez, J. (2008) “Personajes históricos griegos o romanos en el Quijote”, Anales cervantinos 40: 119–132.Google Scholar

López Rueda, J. (1973) Helenistas españoles del siglo XVI. Madrid.Google Scholar

Lorenz, G. (2013) Tiere im Leben der alten Kulturen: Schriftlose Kulturen, Alter Orient, Ägypten, Griechenland und Rom, 2nd ed. Innsbruck.Google Scholar

Luce, T. (1989) “Ancient views on the causes of bias in historical writing”, CPh 84: 16–31.Google Scholar

Luppino Manes, E. (1989) “La traccia della biografia plutarchea di Agesilao: individuazione di una possibile indagine critica”, in Miscellanea greca e romana XIV. Rome, 87–122. Reprinted as “Introduzione” in E. Luppino Manes and A. Marcone (eds.), Plutarco: Vite Parallele. Agesilao – Pompeo. Milan, 87–126.Google Scholar

Luttrell, A. (1960) “Greek histories translated and compiled for Juan Fernandez de Heredia, Master of Rhodes 1377–96”, Speculum 35: 401–407.Google Scholar

Luttrell, A. (1970) “Coluccio Salutati’s letter to Juan Fernández de Heredia”, IMU 13: 235–243.Google Scholar

Mably, G. (1988) De la manière d’écrire l’histoire, ed. de Negroni, B.. Paris.Google Scholar

MacCallum, M. (1910) Shakespeare’s Roman Plays and Their Background. London. Reprinted 1967.Google Scholar

Mack, P. (2016) “Montaigne on reading”, in Desan, P. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Montaigne. Oxford, 415–433.Google Scholar

MacMullen, R. (1997) Christianity and Paganism in the Fourth to Eighth Centuries. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar

Macrides, R. (1996) “The historian in the history”, in Constantinides, C., Panagiotakes, N., and Angelou, A. (eds.), ΦΙΛΗΕΛΛΗΝ: Studies in Honour of Robert Browning. Venice, 205–224.Google Scholar

Maisano, R. and A. Rollo (eds.) (2002) Manuele Crisolora e il ritorno del greco in occidente. Atti del Convegno Internazionale (Naples, 26–29 giugno 1997). Naples.Google Scholar

Malkin, I. (ed.) (2001) Ancient Perceptions of Greek Ethnicity. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Manfredini, M. (1975) “Gli scolii a Plutarco de Areta di Cesarea”, Siculorum Gymnasium 28: 337–350.Google Scholar

Manfredini, M. (1979) “Gli scolî alle Vite di Plutarco”, Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Byzantinistik 28: 83–119.Google Scholar

Manfredini, M. (1983) “Gli scolî alle Vite di Plutarco e i lessici Bizantini coevi”, in Leone, L. and Pietro Luigi, M. (eds.), Studi Bizantini e Neogreci: Atti del IV Congresso nazionale di studi bizantini, Lecce, 21–23 aprile 1980-Calimera, 24 aprile 1980. Galantina: 445–455.Google Scholar

Manfredini, M. (1987) “Codici plutarchei di umanisti italiani”, ASNP 17: 1001–1043.Google Scholar

Manfredini, M. (1988a) “Codici plutarchei contenenti Vitae e Moralia”, in Gallo (1988), 103–122.Google Scholar

Manfredini, M. (1988b) “Sulla tradizione manoscritta dei Moralia 70–77”, in Gallo (1988), 123–138.Google Scholar

Manfredini, M. (1992) “Due codici de Escerpta Plutarchei e l’epitome di Zonara”, Prometheus 18: 193–215.Google Scholar

Manfredini, M. (1993) “Due codici de Escerpta Plutarchei e l’epitome di Zonara II”, Prometheus 19: 1–25.Google Scholar

Manfredini, M. and Orsi, D. P. (eds.) (1987) Plutarco. Le Vite di Arato et di Artaserse. Milan.Google Scholar

Mango, C. (1975) “The availability of books in the Byzantine Empire, A.D. 750–850”, in Byzantine Books and Bookmen. A Dumbarton Oaks Colloquium. Washington, DC, 29–45.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (1992) Heresiography in Context: Hippolytus’ Elenchos as a Source for Greek Philosophy. Leiden.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (1994) Prolegomena: Questions to be Settled Before the Study of an Author, or a Text. Leiden.Google Scholar

Manton, G. (1949) “The manuscript tradition of Plutarch Moralia 70–7”, CQ 43: 97–104.Google Scholar

Manzini, F. (2019) “Plutarch from Voltaire to Stendhal”, in Xenophontos and Oikonomopoulou (2019), 515–527.Google Scholar

Mariev, S. (ed.) (2008) Ioannis Antiocheni Fragmenta quae supersunt omnia. Berlin.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. (1994) “Plutarch’s refutation of Herodotus”, AncW 25: 191–203.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. (1999) “Genre, convention, and innovation in Greco-Roman historiography”, in Kraus (1999), 281–324.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. (2010) “Plutarch, ‘Parallelism’ and the Persian-War Lives”, in Humble (2010b), 217–235.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. (2011) “Romans and/as Barbarians”, in Bonfante, L. (ed.), The Barbarians of Ancient Europe. Cambridge, 347–357.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. (2012) “The fairest victor: Plutarch, Aristides and the Persian Wars”, Histos 6: 91–113.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. (2015a) “Plutarch, Herodotus and the historian’s character”, in Ash, , Mossman, , and Titchener, (2015), 83–95.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. (2015b) “Defending the divine: Plutarch on the gods in Herodotus”, in A. Ellis (ed.), God in History: Reading and Rewriting Herodotean Theology from Plutarch to the Renaissance. Histos supplement 4: 41–83. https://histos.org/documents/SV04EllisGodinHistory.pdf.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. (2018) “The strategies of Plutarch’s On the Malice of Herodotus”, in Thorsen, T. and Harrison, S. (eds.), Dynamics of Ancient Prose: Biographic, Novelistic, Apologetic. Berlin, 19–35.Google Scholar

Markantonatos, A. and Tsangalis, C. (eds.) (2008) Αρχαία ελληνική τραγωδία: θεωρία και πράξη. Athens.Google Scholar

Markopoulos, A. (2003) “Byzantine history writing at the end of the first millennium”, in Magdalino, P. (ed.), Byzantium in the Year 1000. Leiden, 183–197.Google Scholar

Markopoulos, A. (2009) “From narrative historiography to historical biography: new trends in Byzantine historical writing in the 10th–11th centuries”, Byzantinische Zeitschrift 102: 697–715.Google Scholar

Marshall, L. (2017) “Gadfly or spur? The meaning of μύωψ in Plato’s Apology of Socrates”, JHS 137: 163–174.Google Scholar

Martin, H., Jr. (1960) “The concept of prāotēs in Plutarch’s Lives”, GRBS 3: 65–73.Google Scholar

Martin, H. (1961) “The concept of philanthropia in Plutarch’s Lives”, AJPh 82: 164–175.Google Scholar

Martin, H. (1979) “Plutarch’s De sollertia animalium 959 B–C: the discussion of the encomium of hunting”, AJPh 100: 99–106.Google Scholar

Martin, H. (1995) “Moral failure without vice in Plutarch’s Athenian Lives”, Ploutarchos 12.1: 13–18.Google Scholar

Martin, R. (1993) “The Seven Sages as performers of wisdom”, in Dougherty, C. and Kurke, L. (eds.), Cultural Poetics in Archaic Greece: Cult, Performance, Politics. Cambridge, 108–128.Google Scholar

Martindale, C. (ed.) (2004) Shakespeare and the Classics. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Martindale, C. and Martindale, M. (1990) Shakespeare and the Uses of Antiquity. London.Google Scholar

Martinelli Tempesta, S. (2013) “La tradizione manoscritta dei Moralia di Plutarco. Riflessioni per una messa a punto”, in Pace and Volpe Cacciatore (2013), 273–288.Google Scholar

Martínez Benavides, M. (1999) “Plutarco en un comentario a Platón del siglo XVI”, in Montes Cala et al. (1999), 301–308.Google Scholar

Martínez Fernández, A. (1994) “El vocabulario de los epigramas cretenses de época imperial”, in Actas del VIII congreso español de estudios clásicos: (Madrid, 23–28 de septiembre de 1991. Madrid, 185–192.Google Scholar

Masaracchia, A. (1995) “Tracce aristoteliche nell’ An seni res publica gerenda sit e nei Praecepta gerendae rei publicae”, in Gallo and Scardigli (1995), 227–234.Google Scholar

Mason, H. (1970) “The Roman government in Greek sources”, Phoenix 24: 150–159.Google Scholar

Massaro, D. (1995) “I Praecepta gerendae rei publicae e il realismo politico di Plutarco”, in Gallo and Scardigli (1995), 235–244.Google Scholar

Matthiessen, F. (1931) “Sir Thomas North”, in Translation: An Elizabethan Art. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

May, G. (1967) “Corneille and the classics”, Yale French Studies 38: 138–150.Google Scholar

May, T. (1639) The Tragedy of Cleopatra, Queen of Egypt. London.Google Scholar

Mayer, K. (1997) “Themistocles, Plutarch, and the voice of the Other”, in Schrader, Ramón, and Vela (1997), 297–304.Google Scholar

Mazza, M. (1995) “Plutarco e la politica romana. Alcune riconsiderazioni”, in Gallo and Scardigli (1995), 245–268.Google Scholar

McCarthy, B. (1940–1) “Literary reminiscences in Psellus’s Chronographia”, Byzantion 15: 296–299.Google Scholar

McGing, B. and Mossman, J. (eds.) (2006a) The Limits of Ancient Biography. Swansea.Google Scholar

McGing, B. and Mossman, J. (2006b) “Introduction”, in McGing and Mossman (2006a), ix–xx.Google Scholar

McGrail, M. (ed.) (1997) Shakespeare’s Plutarch. Tokyo.Google Scholar

McInerney, J. (2003) “Plutarch’s manly women”, in Rosen, R. and Sluiter, I. (eds.), Andreia: Studies in Manliness and Courage in Classical Antiquity. Leiden, 319–344.Google Scholar

McNamara, J. (1999) “Gendering virtue”, in Pomeroy (1999a), 151–161.Google Scholar

Meeusen, M. (2016) Plutarch’s Science of Natural Problems: A Study with Commentary on Quaestiones Naturales. Leuven.Google Scholar

Meeusen, M. (2017) “Egyptian knowledge at Plutarch’s table: Out of the question?” in Georgiadou and Oikonomopoulou (2017), 215–226.Google Scholar

Mendels, D. (1986) “Greek and Roman history in the Bibliotheca of Photius – a note”, Byzantion 56: 196–206.Google Scholar

Menéndez, Pelayo, M. (1905) Cervantes y El Quijote. Whitefish, MT.Google Scholar

Méniel, B. (2008) “La réception en France, au XVI^e siècle, du traité Comment il faut réfréner la colère”, in Guerrier (2008), 109–130.Google Scholar

Mérot, A. (1987) Eustache Le Sueur 1616–1655. Paris.Google Scholar

Mestre, F. (1999) “Plutarco contra el sofista”, in Pérez Jiménez, García López, and Aguilar (1999), 383–395.Google Scholar

Mestre, F. (2003) “Anacharsis, the wise man from abroad”, Lexis 21: 303–317.Google Scholar

Michelini, A. (ed.) (2003) Plato as Author: The Rhetoric of Philosophy. Leiden.Google Scholar

Migne, J.-P. (ed.) (1928–45) Patrologia Graeca. Paris.Google Scholar

Miles, Gary (1989) “How Roman are Shakespeare’s ‘Romans’?” Shakespeare Quarterly 40: 257–283.Google Scholar

Miles, Geoffrey (1996) Shakespeare and the Constant Romans. Oxford.Google Scholar

Miletti, M. (2014) “Il De laude ipsius di Plutarco a la teoria “classica” dell’autoelogio”, in Volpe Cacciatore, P. (ed.), Plutarco: linguaggi e retorica. Atti del XII Convegno della International Plutarch Society, Seziona Italiana. Naples, 79–99.Google Scholar

Millar, F. (1964) A Study of Cassius Dio. Oxford.Google Scholar

Minon, S. (2015) “Plutarque (Thém. 24) transpose Thucydide (i.136): de l’harmonie austère au péan delphique. Pragmatique et rythmique de deux mode de composition stylistique”, REG 28: 29–99.Google Scholar

Mittelhaus, K. (1911) De Plutarchi Praeceptis gerendae reipublicae. Diss., Leipzig University.Google Scholar

Moles, J. (ed.) (1988) Plutarch: Life of Cicero. Warminster, PA.Google Scholar

Moles, J. (1989) Review of Geiger (1985), CR 39: 229–233.Google Scholar

Moles, J. (1996) “Diatribe”, in S. Hornblower and A. Spawforth (eds.), Oxford Classical Dictionary, 3rd ed. Oxford, 463–464.Google Scholar

Momigliano, A. (1949) “Notes on Petrarch, John of Salisbury and the Institutio Trajani”, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 12: 189–190.Google Scholar

Momigliano, A. (1993) The Development of Greek Biography, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Monaco, M. (2011–12) “Folly and dark humor in the Life of Demetrius”, Ploutarchos 9: 49–59.Google Scholar

Monaghan, L. and Goodman, J. (eds.) (2007) A Cultural Approach to Interpersonal Communication: Essential Readings. Malden, MA.Google Scholar

Montaigne, M. (1987) Michel de Montaigne: The Complete Essays, ed. Screech, M.. London.Google Scholar

Montchrestien, A. de (1943) Les Lacènes: A Critical Edition, ed. Calkins, G.. Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar

Montes Cala, J., Sánchez, M. Ortiz, de Landaluce, and Gallé Cejudo, R. (eds.) (1999) Plutarco, Dioniso y el vino. Madrid.Google Scholar

Montiglio, S. (2011) From Villain to Hero: Odysseus in Ancient Thought. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar

Mora, F. (2007a) “Greci e romani nelle Vite parallele”, Polifemo 7: 135–92.Google Scholar

Mora, F. (2007b) “Nuclei d’interesse e strategie interpretative nelle Quaestiones Romanae di Plutarco”, Gerión 25: 329–370.Google Scholar

Morales Ortiz, A. (2000) Plutarco en España: Traducciones de Moralia en el siglo XVI. Murcia.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, G. (ed.) and R. Jenkins (trans.) (1967) Constantine Porphyogenitus: De administrando imperio. Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Morgan, T. (2011) “The miscellany and Plutarch”, in Klotz and Oikonomopoulou (2011a), 49–73.Google Scholar

Morrison, M. (1974) “Some aspects of the treatment of the theme of Antony and Cleopatra in tragedies of the sixteenth century”, Journal of European Studies 4: 113–125.Google Scholar

Mossman, J. (1988) “Tragedy and epic in Plutarch’s Alexander”, JHS 108: 83–93. Reprinted in Scardigli (1995), 209–228.Google Scholar

Mossman, J. (1992) “Plutarch, Pyrrhus, and Alexander”, in Stadter (1992b), 90–108.Google Scholar

Mossman, J. (ed.) (1997a) Plutarch and His Intellectual World: Essays on Plutarch. London.Google Scholar

Mossman, J. (1997b) “Plutarch and Shakespeare’s HIV parts 1 and 2”, in McGrail (1997), 99–118.Google Scholar

Mossman, J. (1997c) “Plutarch’s Dinner of the Seven Wise Men and its place in symposion literature”, in Mossman (1997a), 119–140.Google Scholar

Mossman, J. (2005a) “Plutarch on animals: rhetorical strategies in de sollertia animalium”, Hermathena 179: 141–163.Google Scholar

Mossman, J. (2005b) “Taxis ou barbaros: Greek and Roman in Plutarch’s Pyrrhus”, CQ 55: 498–517.Google Scholar

Mossman, J. (2010) “A life unparalleled: Plutarch’s Artaxerxes”, in Humble (2010b), 145–168.Google Scholar

Mossman, J. (2014) “Tragedy and the hero”, in Beck (2014a), 437–448.Google Scholar

Mossman, J. (forthcoming) “Tragicomedy? Generic enrichment in Plutarch, Demetrius 38 and Antony 70”, in Duff and Chrysanthou (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Mossman, J. and Titchener, F. B. (2011) “Bitch is not a four-letter word: animal reason and human passion in Plutarch”, in Roskam and Van der Stockt (2011), 273–296.Google Scholar

Moxon, I., J. Smart, and A. J. Woodman (eds.) (1986), Past Perspectives: Studies in Greek and Roman Historical Writing. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Muccioli, F. (2000) “La critica di Plutarco a Filisto e a Timeo”, in Van der Stockt (2000b), 291–307.Google Scholar

Muccioli, F. (2012) La storia attraverso gli esempi: Protagonisti e interpretazioni del mondo greco in Plutarco. Milan.Google Scholar

Mueller-Goldingen, C. (1993) “Politische Theorie und Praxis bei Plutarch”, Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumswissenschaft 19: 201–213.Google Scholar

Müller, R. (1978) “Hellenen und Barbaren im Spiegel der hellenistischen Philosophie”, Klio 60: 183–189.Google Scholar

Mullett, M. (2002) “New literary history and the history of Byzantine literature: a worthwhile endeavour?” in Odorico, P. and Agapitos, P. (eds.), Pour une “nouvelle” histoire de la littérature Byzantine. Paris, 37–60.Google Scholar

Murray, O. (1983) “The symposion as social organisation,” in Hägg, R. (ed.), The Greek Renaissance of the Eighth Century B.C: Tradition and Innovation. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium at the Swedish Institute in Athens, 1–5 June, 1981. Stockholm, 195–200.Google Scholar

Murray, O. (ed.)(1990) Sympotica. A Symposium on the Symposion. Oxford.Google Scholar

Murray, O. and Tecuşan, M. (eds.) (1995) In Vino Veritas. Rome.Google Scholar

Naas, M. (2015) “American gadfly: Plato and the problem of metaphor”, in Bell, J. and Naas, M. (eds.), Plato’s Animals: Gadflies, Horses, Swans, and Other Philosophical Beasts. Bloomington, IN: 43–59.Google Scholar

Nagy, G. (1979) The Best of the Achaeans. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar

Narro Sánchez, A. (2011) “Los valores de la buena mujer en Plutarco a través del De Institutione feminae christianae de Luis Vives”, in Candau Morón et al. (2011), 569–584.Google Scholar

Neill, M. (ed.) (1994) The Oxford Shakespeare: The Tragedy of Anthony and Cleopatra. Oxford.Google Scholar

Németh, A. (2010) Imperial Systematization of the Past: Emperor Constantine VII and His Historical Excerpts. Ph.D. diss., Central European University, Budapest (www.etd.ceu.he/2010/mphnea01.pdf).Google Scholar

Németh, A. (2019) “The reception of Plutarch in Constantinople in the ninth and tenth centuries”, in Xenophontos and Oikonomopoulou (2019), 187–204.Google Scholar

Nerdahl, M. (2007) Homeric Models in Plutarch’s Lives. Diss., University of Wisconsin–Madison.Google Scholar

Nerdahl, M. (2011–12) “Exiling Achilles: reflections on the banished statesman in Plutarch’s Lives”, CJ 107: 331–353.Google Scholar

Nesselrath, H.-G. (ed.) (2010) Plutarch: On the Daimonion of Socrates – Human Liberation, Divine Guidance and Philosophy. Tübingen.Google Scholar

Neville, L. (2012) Heroes and Romans in Twelfth-Century Byzantium. The Material for History of Nikephoros Bryennios. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Neville, L. (2016) Anna Komnene: The Life and Work of a Medieval Historian. Oxford.Google Scholar

Nevin, S. (2014) “Negative comparison: Agamemnon and Alexander in Plutarch’s Agesilaus–Pompey”, GRBS 54: 45–68.Google Scholar

Newmyer, S. T. (1992) “Plutarch on justice toward animals: ancient insights on a moral debate”, Scholia 1: 38–54.Google Scholar

Newmyer, S. T. (1997) “Just beasts? Plutarch and modern science on the sense of fair play in animals”, CO 74.3: 85–88.Google Scholar

Newmyer, S. T. (1999) “Speaking of beasts: the Stoics and Plutarch on animal behaviour and the modern case against animals”, QUCC 63: 99–110.Google Scholar

Newmyer, S. T. (2003) “Paws to reflect: ancients and moderns on the religious sensibilities of animals”, QUCC 75: 111–129.Google Scholar

Newmyer, S. T. (2006) Animals, Rights and Reason in Plutarch and Modern Ethics. New York.Google Scholar

Newmyer, S. T. (2008) “Animals in ancient philosophy: conceptions and misconceptions”, in Kalof, L. (ed.), A Cultural History of Animals in Antiquity. Oxford, 151–174.Google Scholar

Newmyer, S. T. (2014a) “Animals in Plutarch”, in Beck (2014a), 223–234.Google Scholar

Newmyer, S. T. (2014b) “Being the one and becoming the other: animals in ancient philosophical schools”, in Campbell (2014), 507–534.Google Scholar

Newmyer, S. T. (2017a) The Animal and the Human in Ancient and Modern Thought: The “Man Alone of Animals” Concept. London.Google Scholar

Newmyer, S. T. (2017b) “Human–animal interactions in Plutarch as commentary on human moral failings”, in Fögen and Thomas (2017), 233–252.Google Scholar

Nieto Ibáñez, J. M. (2005) “Plutarco y la polémica antiestoica en las Academica de Pedro de Valencia”, in Jufresa et al. (2005), 789–796.Google Scholar

Nieto Ibáñez, J. M. (2007), “Plutarco en la Monarquía Mística de Lorenzo de Zamora: el amor a las humanas y divinas letras”, in Nieto Ibáñez and López López (2007), 639–672.Google Scholar

Nieto Ibáñez, J. M. and López López, R. (eds.) (2007) El amor en Plutarco. León.Google Scholar

Nikolaidis, A. (1986) “ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΟΣ – ΒΑΡΒΑΡΙΚΟΣ: Plutarch on Greek and Barbarian characteristics”, WS 99: 229–244.Google Scholar

Nikolaidis, A. (1988) “Is Plutarch fair to Nikias?” ICS 13: 319–333.Google Scholar

Nikolaidis, A. (1991) “Plutarch’s contradictions”, C&M 42: 153–186.Google Scholar

Nikolaidis, A. (1994) “Plutarch’s contradictions”, AncW 25.2: 213–222.Google Scholar

Nikolaidis, A. (1997) “Plutarch on women and marriage”, WS 110: 27–88.Google Scholar

Nikolaidis, A. (1999) “Plutarch’s attitude to wine”, in Montes Cala et al. (1999), 337–348.Google Scholar

Nikolaidis, A. (ed.) (2008) The Unity of Plutarch’s Work: Moralia Themes in the Lives, Features of the Lives in the Moralia. Berlin.Google Scholar

Nikolaidis, A. (2009) “Philanthropia as sociability and Plutarch’s unsociable heroes”, in Ribeiro Ferreira et al. (2009), 275–288.Google Scholar

Nikolaidis, A. (2011) “Plutarch’s ‘minor ethics:’ some remarks on De garrulitate, De curiositate and De vitioso pudore”, in Roskam and Van der Stockt (2011), 205–221.Google Scholar

Nikolaidis, A. (2012) “Aspects of Plutarch’s notion of philotimia”, in Roskam, De Pourq and Van der Stockt (2012), 31–53.Google Scholar

Nikolaidis, A. (2014) “Morality, characterization, and individuality”, in Beck (2014a), 350–372.Google Scholar

Nikolaidis, A. (2017) “Past and present in Plutarch’s Table Talk”, in Georgiadou and Oikonomopoulou (2017), 257–270.Google Scholar

Nippel, W. (2002) “The construction of the ‘Other’”, in Harrison (2002), 278–310.Google Scholar

Nisbet, R. (1990) “Cola and clausulae in Cicero’s speeches”, in Craik, E. (ed.), Owls to Athens: Essays on Classical Subjects Presented to Sir Kenneth Dover. Oxford, 349–359.Google Scholar

Noël, M.-P. (2002) “Vin, ivresse et démocratie chez Platon”, in Jouanna, Villard, and Béguin (2002), 204–219.Google Scholar

Nora, P. (1984) Les lieux de mémoire. Paris (Trans. A. Goldhammer as Realms of Memory: Rethinking the French Past. New York, 1996).Google Scholar

North, J. and Mack, P. (eds.) (2018) The Afterlife of Plutarch. London.Google Scholar

North, T. (1579) The Lives of the Nobles Grecians and Romanes compared together by that grave learned Philosopher and Historiographer Plutarke of Chaeronea […]. London.Google Scholar

North, T. (1595) The Lives of the Nobles Grecians and Romanes compared together by that grave learned Philosopher and Historiographer Plutarke of Chaeronea […], 2nd ed. London.Google Scholar

North, T. (1603) The Lives of the Nobles Grecians and Romanes compared together by that grave learned Philosopher and Historiographer Plutarke of Chaeronea […] 3rd ed. London.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. (1994) The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. (2002) “The incomplete feminism of Musonius Rufus, Platonist, Stoic, and Roman”, in Nussbaum, M. and Sihvola, J. (eds.), The Sleep of Reason: Erotic Experience and Sexual Ethics in Ancient Greece and Rome. Chicago, IL, 283–326.Google Scholar

Nyquist, M. (2022) “Tyrannicide, law, and sacrifice in Julius Caesar”, ELH 89: 893–926.Google Scholar

Oakesmith, J. (1902) The Religion of Plutarch: A Pagan Creed of Apostolic Times – An Essay. London.Google Scholar

Odorico, P. 2009. “Byzantium, a literature that needs to be reconsidered”, in Stănculescu, I. (ed.), Manuscrise bizantine în colecții bucureştene = Byzantine Manuscripts in Bucharest’s Collections. Bucharest, 64–77.Google Scholar

Oikonomopoulou, K. (2011) “Peripatetic knowledge in the Table Talk”, in Klotz and Oikonomopoulou (2011a), 105–130.Google Scholar

Oikonomopoulou, K. (2013a) “Plutarch’s corpus of Quaestiones in the tradition of imperial Greek encyclopaedism”, in König, J. and Woolf, G. (eds.), Encyclopaedism from Antiquity to the Renaissance. Cambridge, 129–153.Google Scholar

Oikonomopoulou, K. (2013b) “Ethnography and authorial voice in Athenaeus’ Deipnosophistae”, in Almagor, and Skinner, (2013), 179–199.Google Scholar

Oikonomopoulou, K. (2017a) “Space, Delphi and the construction of the Greek past in Plutarch’s Greek Questions”, in Georgiadou and Oikonomopoulou (2017), 107–116.CrossRef Google Scholar

Oikonomopoulou, K. (2017b) “Miscellanies,” in Richter, and Johnson, (2017), 447–462.Google Scholar

O’Neill, E. (1997) “Plutarch on friendship”, in Fitzgerald, J. (ed.), Greco-Roman Perspectives on Friendship. Atlanta, GA, 105–122.Google Scholar

Opelt, I. and Speyer, W. (1967) “Barbar”, JbAC 10: 251–290.Google Scholar

Opsomer, J. (1994) “L’âme du monde et l’âme de l’homme chez Plutarque”, in Valdés, García (1994),33–49.Google Scholar

Opsomer, J. (1996) “Divination and academic ‘skepticism’ according to Plutarch”, in Van der Stockt (1996), 165–194.Google Scholar

Opsomer, J. (1998) In Search of the Truth: Academic Tendencies in Middle Platonism. Brussels.Google Scholar

Opsomer, J. (2001) “Neoplatonist criticisms of Plutarch”, in Pérez Jiménez and Casadesús Bordoy (2001), 187–199.Google Scholar

Opsomer, J. (2004) “Plutarch’s De animae procreatione in Timaeo: manipulation or search for consistency?” in Adamson, P., Baltussen, H. and Stone, M. (eds.), Philosophy, Science and Exegesis in Greek, Arabic and Latin Commentaries. London, 137–162.Google Scholar

Opsomer, J. (2005) “Plutarch’s Platonism revisited”, in Bonazzi, M. and Celluprica, V. (eds.), L’eredità Platonica: studi sul Platonismo da Arcesilao a Proclo. Naples, 163–200.Google Scholar

Opsomer, J. (2006) “Eros in Plutarchs moralischer Psychologie”, in Görgemanns (2006), 208–235.Google Scholar

Opsomer, J. (2007a) “Eros and knowledge in Plutarch’s Amatorius”, in Nieto Ibáñez and López López (2007), 149–168.Google Scholar

Opsomer, J. (2007b) “The place of Plutarch in the history of Platonism”, in Volpe Cacciatore and Ferrari (2007), 281–309.Google Scholar

Opsomer, J. (2007c) “Plutarch on the One and the dyad”, in Sorabji, R. and Sharples, R. (eds.), Greek and Roman Philosophy 100 BC to 200 AD. London, 379–395.Google Scholar

Opsomer, J. (2009) “M. Annius Ammonius: a philosophical profile”, in Bonazzi, and Opsomer, (2009), 123–186.Google Scholar

Opsomer, J. (2012) “Plutarch on the division of the soul”, in Barney, R., Brennan, T., and Brittain, C. (eds.), Plato and the Divided Self. Cambridge, 311–330.Google Scholar

Opsomer, J. (2014) “Plutarch and the Stoics”, in Beck (2014a), 88–103.Google Scholar

Opsomer, J. (2016) “Plutarch’s unphilosophical Lives: philosophical, after all?” in M. Bonazzi and S. Schorn (eds.), Bios philosophos: Philosophy in Ancient Greek Biography. Turnhout, 101–126.Google Scholar

Opsomer, J. (2017) “Is Plutarch really hostile to the Stoics?” in Engberg-Pedersen, T. (ed.), From Stoicism to Platonism: The Development of Philosophy 100 BCE–100 CE. Cambridge, 296–321.Google Scholar

Opsomer, J. (2020) “The Platonic soul, from the Early Academy to the first century CE”, in Inwood, B. and Warren, J. (eds.), Body and Soul in Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge, 171–198.Google Scholar

Opsomer, J. and Steel, C. (eds.) (2012) Proclus: Ten Problems Concerning Providence (Ancient Commentators on Aristotle). London.Google Scholar

Opsomer, J., Roskam, G., and Titchener (eds.), F. B. (2016) A Versatile Gentleman: Consistency in Plutarch’s Writing. Leuven.Google Scholar

Ortega Castejón, J. (1991) “Plutarco y el Comentario de Juan Luis de la Cerda a las Georgicas de Virgilio”, in García López and Calderón Dorda (1991), 183–189.Google Scholar

Osborne, C. (2007) Dumb Beasts and Dead Philosophers: Humanity and the Humane in Ancient Philosophy and Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar

Oudot, E. (2010) “‘Marathon, l’Eurymédon, Platées, laissons-les aux écoles des sophistes!’ Les guerres médiques au second siècle de notre ère”, in Malosse, P.-L., Noël, M.-P., and Schouler, B. (eds.), Clio sous le regard d’Hermès: L’utilisation de l’histoire dans la rhétorique ancienne de l’époque hellénistique à l’antiquité tardive. Alessandria, 143–157.Google Scholar

Pacca, V. (ed.) (1996) Petrarch: Trionfi, Rime, Codice degli abbozzi. Milan.Google Scholar

Pace, B. and Volpe Cacciatore, P. (eds.) (2013) Gli scritti di Plutarco: Tradizione, traduzione, ricezione, commento. Naples.Google Scholar

Padberg, F. (1933) Cicero und Cato Censorius. Bottrop.Google Scholar

Pade, M. (1995) “The Latin translations of Plutarch’s Lives in fifteenth-century Italy and their manuscript diffusion”, in Leonardi, C. and Munk Olsen, B. (eds.), The Classical Tradition in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance: Proceedings of the first European Science Foundation Workshop on “The Reception of Classical Texts.” Spoleto, 169–183.Google Scholar

Pade, M. (1999) “Plutarch, Gellius and John of Salisbury in Humanist Anthologies”, in Rodén, M.-L. (ed.), Ab Aquilone: Nordic Studies in Honour and Memory of Leonard E. Boyle, O.P., Skrifter utgivne af Riksarkivet 14. Stockholm, 57–70.Google Scholar

Pade, M. (2007) The Reception of Plutarch’s Lives in Fifteenth-Century Italy. 2 vols. Copenhagen.Google Scholar

Pade, M. (ed.) (2013) Plutarchi Chaeronensis Vita Dionis Guarino Veronense interprete. Florence.Google Scholar

Pade, M. (2014) “The reception of Plutarch from antiquity to the Italian Renaissance”, in Beck (2014a), 531–543.Google Scholar

Pade, M. (2017) “Lives transformed: John Whethamstede’s use of Plutarch’s Lives”, in Baker (2017), 93–118.Google Scholar

Palm, J. (1955) Über Sprache und Stil des Diodoros von Sizilien. Lund.Google Scholar

Panagopoulos, C. (1977) “Vocabulaire et mentalité dans les Moralia de Plutarque”, DHA 3: 197–235.Google Scholar

Papadi, D. (2005) “Theatricality and dramatic vocabulary in Plutarch’s Moralia: How to tell a flatterer from a friend”, in Jufresa et al. (2005), 401–412.Google Scholar

Papadi, D. (2008) “Moralia in the Lives: tragedy and theatrical imagery in Plutarch’s Pompey”, in Nikolaidis (2008), 112–123.Google Scholar

Papadodima, E. (2010) “The Greek/Barbarian interaction in Euripides’ Andromache, Orestes, Heracleidae: a reassessment of Greek attitudes to foreigners”, Digressus 10: 1–42.Google Scholar

Papakonstantinou, Z. (2014) “Sport, victory, commemoration and elite identities in archaic and early classical Athens”, C&M 65: 87–126.Google Scholar

Paster, G. K. (1989) “‘In the spirit of men there is no blood’: blood as trope of gender in Julius Caesar”, Shakespeare Quarterly 40.1: 284–298.Google Scholar

Patterson, C. (1992) “Plutarch’s ‘Advice on Marriage:’ traditional wisdom through a philosophic lens”, ANRW II.33.6: 4708–4723. Reprinted in Pomeroy (1999a), 128–137.Google Scholar

Paul, G. (1991) “Symposia and deipna in Plutarch’s Lives and in other historical writings”, in Slater (1991), 157–169.Google Scholar

Pavis d’Escurac, H. (1981) “Périls et chances du régime civique selon Plutarque”, Ktèma 6: 287–300.Google Scholar

Payen, P. (2001) “Byzance”, in Hartog, F. et al. (eds.), Plutarque: Vies parallès. Paris, 1972–1973.Google Scholar

Payen, P. (2014) “Plutarch the antiquarian”, in Beck (2014a), 235–248.Google Scholar

Payne, M. (2010) The Animal Part: Human and Other Animals in the Poetic Imagination. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar

Pelegrín Campo, J. (1997) “La noción de barbarie en las Vidas paralelas de Plutarco de Queronea”, in Schrader, Ramón, and Vela (1997), 367–378.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (1973) “Plutarch, Alexander and Caesar: two new fragments?” CQ 23: 343–344.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (1979) “Plutarch’s method of work in the Roman Lives”, JHS 99: 74–96. Reprinted in Scardigli (1995), 265-318; updated version in Pelling (2002a), 1–44.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (1980) “Plutarch’s adaptation of his source-material”, JHS 100: 127–140. Reprinted in Scardigli (1995), 125-154; updated version in Pelling (2002a), 91–115.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (1986a) “Plutarch and Roman politics”, in Moxon, , Smart, , and Woodman, (1986), 159–187. Reprinted in Scardigli (1995), 319–356 and in Pelling (2002a), 207–236.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (1986b) “Synkrisis in Plutarch’s Lives”, in Brenk, F. and Gallo, I. (eds.), Miscellanea Plutarchea. Ferrari, 83–96; updated version in Pelling (2002a), 349–363.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (ed.) (1988a) Plutarch: Life of Antony. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (1988b) “Aspects of Plutarch’s characterization”, ICS 13: 257–274. Reprinted in Pelling (2002a), 283–300.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (1989) “Plutarch: Roman heroes and Greek culture”, in Griffin, M. and Barnes, J. (eds.), Philosophia Togata: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society. Oxford, 199–232.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (1990a) “Truth and fiction in Plutarch’s Lives”, in Russell, D. (ed.), Antonine Literature. Oxford, 19–52. Reprinted in Pelling (2002a), 143–170.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (1990b) “Childhood and personality in Greek biography”, in Pelling (1990c), 213–244. Reprinted in Pelling (2002a), 301–338.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (ed.) (1990c), Characterization and Individuality in Greek Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (1992) “Plutarch and Thucydides”, in Stadter, (1992b) 10–40. Reprinted in Pelling (2002a), 117–141.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (1995) “The moralism of Plutarch’s Lives”, in Innes, Hine, and Pelling (1995), 205–220. Reprinted in Pelling (2002a), 237–251.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (1996) “Prefazione”, in F. Albini (ed.), Plutarco. Vita di Coriolano, Vita di Alcibiade. Milan, xx–lviii.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (1997a) “East is East and West is West – or are they? National stereotypes in Herodotus”, Histos 1 (www.dur.ac.uk/classics/histos/1997/pelling.html).Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (1997b) “Introduzione”, in Pelling, C. and Melandri, E. (eds.), Plutarco: Vite parallele. Filopemene – Tito Flaminino. Milan, 87–166, 249–331.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (1997c) “Is death the end? Closure in Plutarch’s Lives”, in Roberts, D., Dunn, F., and Fowler, D. (eds.), Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature. Princeton, NJ, 228–250; updated version in Pelling (2002a), 365–386.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (1997d) “Plutarch on Caesar’s fall”, in Mossman (1997a), 215–232.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (1997e) “The shaping of Coriolanus: Dionysius, Plutarch and Shakespeare”, in McGrail (1997), 3–32. Reprinted in Pelling (2002a), 387–411.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (1999a) “Dionysiac diagnostics: some hints of Dionysus in Plutarch’s Lives”, in Montes Cala et al. (1999), 359–368. Reprinted in Pelling (2002a), 197–206.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (1999b) “Epilogue”, in Kraus (1999), 325–357.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (1999c) “‘Making myth look like history:’ Plutarch’s Theseus-Romulus”, in Pérez Jiménez, García López, and Aguilar (1999), 431–443. Reprinted in Pelling (2002a), 171–195.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (2000a) Literary Texts and the Greek Historian. London.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (2000b) “Rhetoric, paideia, and psychology in Plutarch’s Lives”, in Van der Stockt (2000b), 331–339. Reprinted in Pelling (2002a), 339–347.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (2001) Review of Ehlers (1998), CR 51: 273–276.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (2002a) Plutarch and History: Eighteen Studies. Swansea.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (2002b) “The Apophthegmata Regum et Imperatorum and Plutarch’s Roman Lives”, in Pelling (2002a), 65–90.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (2002c) “‘You for me and me for you’: narrator and narratee in Plutarch’s Lives”, in Pelling (2002a), 267–282.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (2004) “Do Plutarch’s politicians never learn?” in de Blois et al. (2004), 87–103.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (2005a) “Synkrisis revisited”, in Pérez Jiménez and Titchener (2005), 325–340.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (2005b) “Plutarch’s Socrates”, Hermathena 179: 105–139.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (2006) “Breaking the bounds: writing about Julius Caesar”, in McGing and Mossman (2006a), 255–280.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (2007a) “De malignitate Plutarchi: Plutarch, Herodotus and the Persian wars”, in Bridges, E., Hall, E., and Rhodes, P. (eds.), Cultural Responses to the Persian Wars. Oxford, 145–164.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (2007b) “Ion’s Epidemiai and Plutarch’s Ion”, in Jennings and Katsaros (2007), 75–109.CrossRef Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (2009) “Biography”, in Boys-Stones, Graziosi, and Vasunia (2009), 608–616.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (2010) “Plutarch’s ‘Tale of Two Cities’: do the Parallel Lives combine as global histories?” in Humble (2010b), 217–235.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (2011a) Plutarch: Caesar. Translated with an Introduction and Commentary.Oxford.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (2011b) “What is popular about Plutarch’s ‘popular philosophy’?” in Roskam and Van der Stockt (2011), 41–58.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (2012) “Plutarch on Roman philotimia”, in Roskam, De Pourcq, and Van der Stockt (2012), 55–67.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (2014) “Political philosophy”, in Beck (2014a), 149–162.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (2016a) “Herodotus, Polycrates – and maybe Stesimbrotus too?” JHS 136: 113–120.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (2016b) “Tragic colouring in Plutarch”, in Opsomer, , Roskam, , and Titchener, (eds.), 113–133.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (2020) “Fifth-century preliminaries”, in De Temmerman (2020), 97–110.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (in press) “A doubles match: Agis–Cleomenes and the Gracchi”, in Davies and Mossman (forthcoming in 2023).Google Scholar

Pérez Jiménez, A. (1990) “Plutarco y el humanismo español del Renacimiento”, in Pérez Jiménez and del Cerro Calderón (1990), 229–247.Google Scholar

Pérez Jiménez, A. (1996) “ΔΕΙΣΙΔΑΙΜΟΝΙΑ: el miedo a los dioses en Plutarco”, in Van der Stockt (1996), 195–226.Google Scholar

Pérez Jiménez, A. (1998) “Luisa Sigea y Plutarco”, in Gallo (1998a), 377–388.Google Scholar

Pérez Jiménez, A. (2002) “Plutarco y la literatura española del XVII: Importancia actual de los estudios sobre Plutarco”, in Ribeiro Ferreira (2002), 353–368.Google Scholar

Pérez Jiménez, A. (2003a) “Las Vidas Paralelas de Plutarco de la emblemática hispánica de los siglos XVI y XVII”, Humanitas 55: 223–240.Google Scholar

Pérez Jiménez, A. (2003b) “El Plutarco de los Moralia en la literatura emblemática española”, in Fernández Ariza, G. (ed.), Literatura Hispanoamericana del Siglo XX: Mímesis e Iconografía. Málaga, 169–195.Google Scholar

Pérez Jiménez, A. (2003c) “Los héroes de Plutarco como modelo en la literatura emblemática europea de los siglos XVI–XVII”, in Barzanò, et al. (2003), 375–402.Google Scholar

Pérez Jiménez, A. (2005) “Usos didácticos de la imagen y la palabra: El Plutarco de Juan Francisco de Villava”, in Jufresa et al. (2005), 797–808.Google Scholar

Pérez Jiménez, A. (2006) “Plutarco, Juan de Mal Lara y la Galera Real de D. Juan de Austria”, in Aguilar and Alfageme (2006), 233–246.Google Scholar

Pérez Jiménez, A. (2007) “El Plutarco de Antonio Agustín”, in Nieto Ibáñez and López López (2007), 673–686.Google Scholar

Pérez Jiménez, A. (2009) “Plutarco de Queronea”, in Lafarga, F. and Pegenaute (eds.), L., Diccionario histórico de la traducción en España. Madrid, 910–911.Google Scholar

Pérez Jiménez, A. (2014) “The reception of Plutarch in Spain”, in Beck (2014a), 556–576.Google Scholar

Pérez Jiménez, A. (2019) “Plutarch’s fortune in Spain”, in Xenophontos and Oikonomopoulou (2019), 606–621.Google Scholar

Pérez Jiménez, A. and Casadesús Bordoy, F. (eds.) (2001) Estudios sobre Plutarco: misticismo y religiones mistéricas en la obra de Plutarco. Actas del VII simposio Español sobre Plutarco, Palma de Mallorca, 2–4 de Noviembre de 2000. Madrid.Google Scholar

Pérez Jiménez, A. and del Cerro Calderón, G. (eds.) (1990) Estudios sobre Plutarco: obra y tradición. Málaga.Google Scholar

Pérez Jiménez, A., García López, J., and Aguilar, R. (eds.) (1999) Plutarco, Platón y Aristóteles. Actas del V Congreso Internacional de la I.P.S. (Madrid-Cuenca, 4–7 de mayo de 1999). Madrid.Google Scholar

Pérez Jiménez, A. and Macías Villalobos, C. (2009) Paradigmas de nuestra cultura: astrología y poder político en la Antigüedad : discurso pronunciado en el acto de ingreso en la Sociedad Erasmiana de Málaga por el Dr. D. Aurelio Pérez Jiménez, y contestación del Dr. D. Cristóbal Macías Villalobos: Málaga, 24 de abril de 2009. Málaga.Google Scholar

Pérez Jiménez, A. and Titchener, F. B. (eds.) (2005) Historical and Biographical Values of Plutarch’s Works: Studies Devoted to Professor Philip Stadter by the International Plutarch Society. Málaga.Google Scholar

Pérez Martín, I. (2019) “Maximos Planoudes and the transmission of Plutarch’s Moralia”, in Xenophontos and Oikonomopoulou (2019), 295–309.Google Scholar

Pérez Molina, M. and Guzmán Arias, C. (1991) “La presencia de Plutarco en la didascalia multiplex de F. Fernández de Córdova”, in García López and Calderón Dorda (1991), 191–199.Google Scholar

Pertusi, A. (1964) Leonzio Pilato fra Petrarca e Boccaccio: Le sue versioni omeriche negli autografi di Venezia e la cultura greca del primo Umanesimo. Venice.Google Scholar

Pertusi, A. Petrarca, F. (1996) Trionfi, Rime estravaganti, Codice degli abbozzi, eds. V. Pacca and L. Paolino. Milan.Google Scholar

Petropoulou, M.-Z. (2008) “Humans treated as animals: human sacrifice real and metaphorical”, in Alexandridis, , Wild, , and Winkler-Horaček, (eds.), 99–118.Google Scholar

Petrucci, F. M. (2016) “Argumentative strategies in the ‘Platonic section’ of Plutarch’s De Iside et Osiride (chapters 45–64)”, Mnemosyne 69: 226–248.Google Scholar

Pfeiffer, S. (2008) “Der ägyptische ‘Tierkult’ im Spiegel der griechisch-römischen Literatur”, in Alexandridis, , Wild, , and Winkler-Horaček, (2008), 373–393.Google Scholar

Phillips, A. and Willcock, M. (eds.) (1999) Xenophon and Arrian, On Hunting. Warminster.Google Scholar

Piccione, R. (1998) “Plutarco nell’Anthologion di Giovanni Stobeo”, in Gallo (1998a), 161–201.Google Scholar

Piccirilli, L. (1989) “La tradizione ‘nera’ nelle biografie plutarchee degli Ateniesi del sesto e del quinto secolo”, in Ceresa-Gastaldo, A. (ed.), Gerolamo e la biografia letteraria. Genoa, 5–21.Google Scholar

Piccirilli, L. (1990a) “Introduzione”, in C. Carena, M. Manfredini, and L. Piccirilli (eds.) Plutarco: Le Vite di Cimone e di Lucullo. Milan, ix–xl.Google Scholar

Piccirilli, L. (1990b) “Nicia in Plutarco”, AALig 47: 351–368.Google Scholar

Piccirilli, L. (1993) “Introduzione to Nicia”, in Angeli Bertinelli, M., Carena, C., Manfredini, M., and Piccirilli, L. (eds.), Plutarco: Le Vite di Nicia e di Crasso. Milan, ix–xxviii.Google Scholar

Pietsch, E. (2005) “The Chronographia of Michael Psellos: history of emperors, autobiography and apology”, Bysantinska sällskapets Bulletin 23: 23–33.Google Scholar

Pimouguet-Pédarros, I. (2011) La cité à l’épreuve des rois. Le siège de Rhodes par Démétrios Poliorcète (305–304 av. J.-C.). Rennes.Google Scholar

Pineaux, J. (1986) “Un continuateur des Vies parallèles”, in Balard (1986), 331–342.Google Scholar

Pinheiro, J. (2013) Tempo e espaço da paideia nas Vidas de Plutarco. Coimbra.Google Scholar

Plese, Z. (2005) “Platonist Orientalism”, in Pérez Jiménez and Titchener (2005), 355–381.Google Scholar

Pomeroy, S. (ed.) (1999a) Plutarch’s Advice to the Bride and Groom and A Consolation to His Wife. New York.Google Scholar

Pomeroy, S. (1999b) “Reflections on Plutarch, Advice to the Bride and Groom: something old, something new, something borrowed”, in Pomeroy (1999a), 33–57.Google Scholar

Pomeroy, S. (1999c) “Reflections on Plutarch, Advice to the Bride and Groom”, in Pomeroy (1999a), 75–81.Google Scholar

Pordomingo Pardo, F. (1996) “El Plutarco de la biblioteca Universitaria de Salamanca: Manuscritos e impresos de los siglos XV y XVI”, in Fernández Delgado and Pordomingo Pardo (1996), 461–474.Google Scholar

Pordomingo Pardo, F. (1999) “El banquete de Plutarco: ficción literaria o realidad histórica?” in Montes Cala et al. (1999), 379–392.Google Scholar

Porter, J. (ed.) (2006a) Classical Pasts: The Classical Traditions of Greece and Rome. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Porter, J. (2006b) “Feeling classical: classicism and ancient literary criticism”, in Porter (2006a), 301–352.Google Scholar

Porter, J. (2006c) “What is ‘classical’ about classical antiquity?” in Porter (2006a), 1–65.Google Scholar

Porter, W. (ed.) (1937) Plutarch’s Life of Aratus. Dublin.Google Scholar

Powell, A. (1999) “Spartan women assertive in politics? Plutarch’s Lives of Agis and Kleomenes”, in Hodkinson, S. and Powell, A. (eds.), Sparta: New Perspectives. London, 393–419.Google Scholar

Powell, J. (ed.) (1988) Cicero. Cato Maior De Senectute. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Prandi, L. (2000) “Gli esempi del passato greco nei Precetti Politici di Plutarco”, RSA 30: 91–107.Google Scholar

Prandi, L. (2005) “Singolare e plurale nelle Vite greche di Plutarco”, in de Blois et al. (2005), 141–156.Google Scholar

Preston, R. (2001) “Roman questions, Greek answers: Plutarch and the construction of identity”, in Goldhill (2001b), 86–119.Google Scholar

Priestley, J. (2014) Herodotus and Hellenistic Culture: Literary Studies in the Reception of the Histories. Oxford.Google Scholar

Prior, W. J. (1991) Virtue and Knowledge: An Introduction to Ancient Greek Ethics. London.Google Scholar

Puech, B. (1983) “Grands-prêtres et helladarques d’Achaïe”, REA 85: 15–43.Google Scholar

Puech, B. (1992) “Prosopographie des amis de Plutarque,” ANRW II. 33.6: 4831–4893.Google Scholar

Pütz, B. (2014) “Good to laugh with: animals in comedy”, in Campbell (2014), 61–72.Google Scholar

Raaflaub, K. (2000) “Poets and lawgivers and the beginnings of political reflection in Greece, Ancient”, in Rowe, C. and Schofield, M. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Rabbow, P. (1914) Antike Schriften über Seelenheilung und Seelenleitung auf ihre Quellen untersucht I, Die Therapie des Zorns. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Rabelais, F. (1994) Oeuvres complètes, ed. Huchon, M.. Paris.Google Scholar

Rabieh, L. (2006) Plato and the Virtue of Courage. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar

Racine, J. (1966) Oeuvres completes. 2 vols., ed. Picard, R.. Paris.Google Scholar

Radermacher, L. (1897) “Studien zur Geschichte der griechischen Rhetorik”, RhM 52: 412–424.Google Scholar

Raeymaekers, J. (1996) “The origins of the rivalry between Philopoemen and Flamininus”, AncSoc 27: 259–276.Google Scholar

Rajak, T. (2001) Jewish Dialogue with Greece and Rome. Leiden.Google Scholar

Ramírez-Araujo, A. (1954) “Usque ad aras amicus: Un adagio glosado por Cervantes”, HR 22: 224–227.Google Scholar

Ramírez de Verger, A. (1990) “Plutarco en el De orbe novo de Juan Ginés de Sepulveda”, in Pérez Jiménez and Del Cerro Calderón (1990), 271–276.Google Scholar

Ramón Palerm, V. (2000) “El De Herodoti malignitate de Plutarco come epideixis retórica”, in Van der Stockt (2000b), 387–398.Google Scholar

Ramón Palerm, V. (2011) “Plutarco y Juan de Pineda”, in Candau Morón (2011), 621–632.Google Scholar

Ramón Palerm, V. (forthcoming) “The irreligiosity of Herodotus: Plutarch’s view”, in Duff and Fletcher (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Ramos Maldonado, S. (1999) “Latin and vernacular in the works of Bernardino Gómez Miedes”, in Taylor, B. and Coroleu, A. (eds.), Latin and Vernacular in Renaissance Spain. Manchester, 105–111.Google Scholar

Reeve, M. (1991) “The rediscovery of classical texts in the Renaissance”, in Pecere, O. (ed.), Itinerari dei testi antichi. Rome, 115–147.Google Scholar

Rehdantz, C. and Blass, F. (1886) Demosthenes’ Neun Philippische Reden, 2.2, Indices, 4th ed. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Reinsch, D. (2019) “Plutarch in Michael Psellos’ Chronographia”, in Xenophontos and Oikonomopoulou (2019), 234–247.Google Scholar

Reinsch, D. and Kambylis, A. (eds.) (2001) Annae Comnenae Alexias. 2 vols. Berlin.Google Scholar

Relihan, J. C. (1992) “Re-thinking the history of the literary symposium”, ICS 17: 213–244.Google Scholar

Renehan, R. (1981) “The Greek anthropocentric view of man”, HSCPh 85: 239–259.Google Scholar

Renoirte, T. (1951) Les “Conseils politiques” de Plutarque: une lettre ouverte aux Grecs à l’époque de Trajan. Louvain.Google Scholar

Resta, G. (1962) Le epitomi di Plutarco nel Quattrocento. Padova.Google Scholar

Resta, G. (1986) “Francesco Filelfo tra Bisanzio e Roma”, in Avesani, R., Billanovich, G., Ferrari, M., and Pozzi, G. (eds.), Francesco Filelfo nel quinto centenario della morte. Atti del XVII convegno di studi maceratesi, Tolentino, 27–30 settembre, 1981. Padua, 1–60.Google Scholar

Reydams-Schils, G. (ed.) (2011) Thinking through Excerpts: Studies on Stobaeus (Monothéismes et philosophie). Turnhout.Google Scholar

Reynolds, B. (1954) “Bruni and Perotti present a Greek historian”, BiblH&R 16: 108–118.Google Scholar

Ribeiro Ferreira, J. (ed.) (2002) Plutarco Educador da Europa. Coimbra.Google Scholar

Ribeiro Ferreira, J. and Leão, D. (eds.) (2003) Os fragmentos de Plutarco e a recepção de sua obra. Coimbra.Google Scholar

Ribeiro Ferreira, J., Leão, D., Tröster, M., and Barata Dias, P. (eds.) (2009) Symposion and Philanthropia in Plutarch. Coimbra.Google Scholar

Ribeiro Ferreira, J., D. Leão, and C. Martins de Jesus (eds). (2012) “Nomos,” “Kosmos,” & “Dike” in Plutarch. Coimbra.Google Scholar

Rich, J. and G. Shipley (eds.) (1993), War and Society in the Roman World. London.Google Scholar

Richter, D. (2001) “Plutarch on Isis and Osiris: text, cult, and cultural appropriation”, TAPhA 131: 191–216.Google Scholar

Richter, D. S. and Johnson, W. A. (eds.) (2017) The Oxford Handbook of the Second Sophistic. New York.Google Scholar

Rist, J. (2001) “Plutarch’s Amatorius: a commentary on Plato’s theories of love?” CQ 51: 557–575.Google Scholar

Roberto, U. (ed.) (2005) Ioannis Antiocheni Fragmenta ex Historia chronica. Berlin.Google Scholar

Rodrigues, A. (in press). “Life of Lycurgus”, in Davies and Mossman (forthcoming in 2023).Google Scholar

Roig Lanzillotta, L. and Muñoz Gallarte, I. (eds.) (2012) Plutarch in the Religious and Philosophical Discourse of Late Antiquity. Leiden.Google Scholar

Roller, M. (2001) Constructing Autocracy: Aristocrats and Emperors in Julio-Claudian Rome. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Roller, M. (2003) “Horizontal women: posture and sex in the Roman convivium”, AJPh 124: 377–422.Google Scholar

Roller, M. (2006) Dining Posture in Ancient Rome: Bodies, Values, and Status. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Rollo, A. (2002) “Problemi e prospettive della ricerca su Manuele Crisolora”, in Maisano, and Rollo, (2002), 31–85.Google Scholar

Romano, R. (1994) “La Lysis inedita di Giovanni Grasso”, Koinonia 18: 199–210.Google Scholar

Romeri, L. (2002) Philosophes entre mots et mets: Plutarque, Lucien, Athénée autour de la table de Platon. Grenoble.Google Scholar

Rosenmeyer, T. (1985) “Ancient literary genres: a mirage?” Yearbook of Comparative and General Literature 34: 74–84.Google Scholar

Rosivach, V. (1984) “The Romans’ view of the Persians”, CW 78: 1–8.Google Scholar

Roskam, G. (1999) “Dionysus sublimated”, in Montes Cala et al. (1999), 433–445.Google Scholar

Roskam, G. (2004) “Plutarch on self and others”, AncSoc 34: 245–273.Google Scholar

Roskam, G. (2004–5) “Τὸ καλὸν αὐτὸ [. .] ἔχοντας τέλος (Praec. ger. reip. 799a). Plutarch on the foundation of the politician’s career”, Ploutarchos 2: 89–103.Google Scholar

Roskam, G. (2005a) “Political education in the service of the public interest: Plutarch on the motivation of the statesman”, in Jufresa et al. (2005), 133–138.Google Scholar

Roskam, G. (2005b) On the Path to Virtue: The Stoic Doctrine of Moral Progress and Its Reception in (Middle) Platonism. Leuven.Google Scholar

Roskam, G. (2007a) A Commentary on Plutarch’s “De latenter vivendo.” Leuven.Google Scholar

Roskam, G. (2007b) “Plutarch’s attack on Epicurus’ ideal of an ‘unnoticed life’: polemical strategies in De latenter vivendo”, in Nieto Ibáñez and López López (2007), 867–876.Google Scholar

Roskam, G. (2009a) “Educating the young … over wine? Plutarch, Calvenus Taurus, and Favorinus as convivial teachers”, in Ribeiro Ferreira et al. (2009), 369–383.Google Scholar

Roskam, G. (2009b) Plutarch’s Maxime com principibus philosopho esse disserendum: An Interpretation with Commentary. Leuven.Google Scholar

Roskam, G. (2010) “Plutarch’s ‘Socratic symposia’: the Symposia of Plato and Xenophon as literary models in the Quaestiones Convivales”, Athenaeum 98: 45–70.Google Scholar

Roskam, G. (2010–11) “How to deal with the philosophical tradition? Some general rules in Plutarch’s anti-Epicurean treatises”, Ploutarchos: 8: 133–146.Google Scholar

Roskam, G. (2011a) “Ambition and love of fame in Plutarch’s Lives of Agis, Cleomenes, and the Gracchi”, CPh 106: 208–225.Google Scholar

Roskam, G. (2011b) “Aristotle in middle Platonism: the case of Plutarch of Chaeronea”, in Bénatouïl, T., Maffi, E., and Trabattoni, F. (eds.), Plato, Aristotle, or Both? Dialogues between Platonism and Aristotelianism in Antiquity. Hildesheim, 35–61.Google Scholar

Roskam, G. (2011c) “Plutarch against Epicurus on affection for offspring: a reading of De amore prolis”, in Roskam and Van der Stockt (2011), 175–201.Google Scholar

Roskam, G. (2014) “Philanthropy, dignity, and euergetism”, in Beck (2014a), 516–528.Google Scholar

Roskam, G. (2017) “Discussing the past: moral vision, truth and benevolence in Plutarch’s On the Malice of Herodotus”, in Georgiadou and Oikonomopoulou (2017), 161–173.Google Scholar

Roskam, G. (2021) Plutarch: New Surveys in the Classics, 47. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Roskam, G. (forthcoming) “Dancing away the truth: Plutarch’s polemical approach in On the malice of Herodotus”, in Duff and Fletcher (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Roskam, G. and Van der Stockt, L. (eds.) (2011) Virtues for the People: Aspects of Plutarchan Ethics. Leuven.Google Scholar

Roskam, G., De Pourcq, M., and Van der Stockt, L. (eds.) (2012) The Lash of Ambition: Plutarch, Imperial Greek Literature and the Dynamics of Philotimia. Leuven.Google Scholar

Rossi, A. (2000) “The camp of Pompey: strategy of representation in Caesar’s Bellum Ciuile”, CJ 95: 239–256.Google Scholar

Rossi, V. and Bosco, U. (eds.) (1933–42) Le Familiari, I–IV. Edizione nazionale delle opere di Francesco Petrarca X–XIII. Florence.Google Scholar

Rotroff, S. I. and Hoff, M. C. (eds.) (1997) The Romanization of Athens: proceedings of an international conference held at Lincoln, Nebraska (April 1996). Oxbow monograph; 94. Oxford.Google Scholar

Roueché, C. (2002) “The literary background of Kekaumenos”, in Holmes, C. and Waring, J. (eds.), Literacy, Education and Manuscript Transmission in Byzantium and Beyond. Leiden, 111–138.Google Scholar

Rousseau, J. (1964) Oeuvres completes: Vol. I, eds. Spink, J., Wirz, C., Burgelin, P., Gouhier, H., de Vilmorin, R., and Gagnebin, B.. Paris.Google Scholar

Rousseau, J. (1969) Oeuvres completes: Vol. IV, eds. Spink, J., Wirz, C., Burgelin, P., Gouhier, H., de Vilmorin, R., and Gagnebin, B.. Paris.Google Scholar

Roux, P. de (ed.) (1986) M.-J. Roland: Mémoires. Paris.Google Scholar

Runciman, S. (1970) The Last Byzantine Renaissance. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Russell, D. (1963) “Plutarch’s Life of Coriolanus”, JRS 53: 21–28. Reprinted in Scardigli (1995), 357–372.Google Scholar

Russell, D. (1966a) “On reading Plutarch’s Lives”, G&R 13: 139–154. Reprinted in Scardigli (1995), 75–94.Google Scholar

Russell, D. (1966b) “Plutarch, ‘Alcibiades’ 1–16,” PCPhS 12: 37–47. Reprinted in Scardigli (1995), 191–207.Google Scholar

Russell, D. (1968) “On reading Plutarch’s Moralia”, G&R 15: 130–146.Google Scholar

Russell, D. (1973a) Plutarch. London.Google Scholar

Russell, D. (1973b) “Remarks on Plutarch’s de vitando aere alieno”, JHS 93: 163–171.Google Scholar

Russell, D. (1983) Greek Declamation. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Russell, D. (1989) “Greek criticism of the Empire”, in Kennedy, G. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism: Vol. I. Classical Criticism. Cambridge, 297–329.Google Scholar

Russell, D. (1992) “ἦθος nei dialoghi di Plutarco”, ASNP 32: 399–429.Google Scholar

Russell, D. (1993) Plutarch: Selected Essays and Dialogues. Oxford.Google Scholar

Russell, D. (1997) “Plutarch, Amatorius 13–18”, in Mossman (1997a), 99–111.Google Scholar

Russell, D. (2010) “Introduction”, in Nesselrath (2010), 3–15.Google Scholar

Said, E. (1978) Orientalism: Western Conceptions of the Orient. New York.Google Scholar

Saïd, S. (1994) “Lucien ethnographe”, in A. Billault (ed.), Lucien de Samosate. Lyon, 149–170.Google Scholar

Saïd, S. (2001) “The discourse of identity in Greek rhetoric from Isocrates to Aristides”, in Malkin, (2001), 275–299.Google Scholar

Saïd, S. (2002) “Greeks and Barbarians in Euripides’ tragedies: the end of differences?” in Harrison (2002), 62–100.Google Scholar

Saïd, S. (2005a) “Poésie et éducation chez Plutarque ou comment convertir la poésie en introduction à la philosophie”, in Jufresa, et al. (2005), 147–176.Google Scholar

Saïd, S. (2005b) “Plutarch and the people in the Parallel Lives”, in de Blois et al. (2005), 7–25.Google Scholar

Saint-Évremond, C. de (1962) Oeuvres en prose: Vol. I, ed. Ternois, R.. Paris.Google Scholar

Saint-Évremond, C. de (1969), Oeuvres en prose: Vol. IV, ed. R. Ternois (Paris).Google Scholar

Sainte-Beuve, C. A. (1839) Critiques et portraits littéraires: Vol. 5 (Paris).Google Scholar

Sainte-Beuve, C. A. (1844) Portraits littéraires: Vol. 2, 2nd ed. Paris.Google Scholar

Salcedo Parrondo, M. (2005) “Un león en la ciudad: el perfil leonino del Alcibíades de Plutarco”, in Boulogne (2005b), 135–141.Google Scholar

Salmeri, G. (2000) “Dio, Rome and the civic life of Asia Minor”, in Swain, S. (ed.), Dio Chrysostom: Politics, Letters and Philosophy. Oxford, 53–92.Google Scholar

Salmeri, G. (2011) “Reconstructing the political life and culture of the Greek cities of the Roman Empire”, in van Nijf, and Alston (2011), 197–214.Google Scholar

Salmon, P. (1984) “Racisme ou refus de la difference dans le monde greco-romain”, DHA 10: 75–98.Google Scholar

Salutati, C. (1891–1911) Epistolario, I–IV, ed. Novati, F.. Rome.Google Scholar

Salutati, C. (1985) De fato et fortuna, ed. Bianca, C.. Florence.Google Scholar

Sancho Montés, S. (2005) “Plutarc a la Primera Part de la Història de València d’en Pere-Antoni Beuter”, in Jufresa et al. (2005), 835–842.Google Scholar

Sancisi-Weerdenburg, H. (2001) “Yauna by the sea and across the sea”, in Malkin, (2001), 323–346.Google Scholar

Sandbach, F. H. (1939) “Rhythm and authenticity in Plutarch’s Moralia”, CQ 33: 194–203.Google Scholar

Sandbach, F. H. (1941) “Some textual notes on Plutarch’s Moralia”, CQ 35: 110–118.Google Scholar

Sandbach, F. H. (ed. and trans.) (1969) Plutarch’s Moralia. Vol. XV Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Sansone, D. (ed. and trans.) (1989) Plutarch: The Lives of Aristeides and Cato. Warminster.Google Scholar

Santese, G. (1994) “Animali e razionalità in Plutarco”, in Castignone, S. and Lanata, G. (eds.), Filosofi e animali nel mondo antico. Pisa, 141–170.Google Scholar

Santese, G. (2005) “Plutarco, il linguaggio e la trasmissione delle conoscenze nel mondo animale”, in Jufresa et al. (2005), 453–461.Google Scholar

Scannapieco, R. (2007) “‘Voi che per li occhi mi passaste ’l core …’: parola e imagine nell’Amatorius di Plutarco”, in Volpe Cacciatore and Ferrari (2007), 125–170.Google Scholar

Scardigli, B. (ed.) (1995) Essays on Plutarch’s Lives. Oxford.Google Scholar

Schadee, H. (2016) “Alfonso ‘the Magnanimous’ of Naples as portrayed by Facio and Panormita: four versions of emulation, representation, and virtue”, in Baker, et al. (2016), 95–120.Google Scholar

Schamp, J. (1995) “Le Plutarque de Photios”, AC 64: 155–184.Google Scholar

Schamp, J. (2000) Les Vies des dix orateurs attiques. Fribourg.Google Scholar

Schenkeveld, D. (1982) “The structure of Plutarch’s De audiendis poetis”, Mnemosyne 35: 60–71. Reprinted in Laird (2006), 313–324.Google Scholar

Schepens, G. (2000) “Plutarch’s view of ancient Rome: some remarks on the Life of Pyrrhus”, in Mooren (ed.), L., Politics, Administration and Society in the Hellenistic and Roman World. Leuven, 349–364.Google Scholar

Schmid, W. (1887–96) Der Atticismus, 4 vols. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Schmidt, T. (1999) Plutarque et les barbares: La rhétorique d’une image. Leuven.Google Scholar

Schmidt, T. (2000) “La Rhétorique des doublets chez Plutarque: le cas de βάρβαρος καὶ […]”, in Van der Stockt (2000b), 455–464.Google Scholar

Schmidt, T. (2002) “Plutarch’s timeless barbarians and the age of Trajan”, in Stadter and Van der Stockt (2002), 57–72.Google Scholar

Schmidt, T. (2004) “Barbarians in Plutarch’s political thought”, in de Blois et al. (2004), 227–235.Google Scholar

Schmidt, T. (2008) “Les Questions barbares de Plutarque: un essai de reconstitution”, Recherches sur les rhétoriques religieuses 8: 165–183.Google Scholar

Schmidt, T. (2011) “Sophistes, barbares et identité grecque: le cas de Dion Chrysostome”, in Schmidt, T. and Fleury, P. (eds.), Perceptions of the Second Sophistic and Its Times – Regards sur la Seconde Sophistique et son époque. Toronto, 105–119.Google Scholar

Schmidt, T., Vamvouri, M., and Hirsch-Luipold, R. (eds.) (2020) The Dynamics of Intertextuality in Plutarch. Leiden.Google Scholar

Schmitt Pantel, P. (1990) “Sacrificial meal and symposion: two models of civic institutions in the archaic city”, in Murray, (1990), 14–33.Google Scholar

Schmitt-Pantel, P. (1992) La cité au banquet: Histoire des repas publics dans les cités grecques. Rome.Google Scholar

Schmitt-Pantel, P. (1999) “Manger entre citoyens: les repas dans les cités grecques antiques”, in Flandrin, and Cobbi, (1999), 39–57.Google Scholar

Schmitt-Pantel, P. (2003) “Le Banquet et le ‘genre’ sur les images grecques, propos sur les compagnes et les compagnons”, Pallas 61: 83–95.Google Scholar

Schmitt-Pantel, P. (2009) Hommes illustres: moeurs et politique à Athènes au Ve siècle. Paris.Google Scholar

Schmitz, T. (1997) Bildung und Macht: zur sozialen und politischen Funktion der zweiten Sophistik in der griechischen Welt der Kaiserzeit. Munich.Google Scholar

Schmitz, T. (2014) “Plutarch and the Second Sophistic”, in Beck (2014a), 32–42.Google Scholar

Schofield, M. (1999) Saving the City: Philosopher-Kings and Other Classical Paradigms. London.Google Scholar

Schofield, M. (2003) “Stoic ethics”, in Inwood, (2003), 233–256.Google Scholar

Schoppe, C. (1994) Plutarchs Interpretation der Ideenlehre Platons. Münster.Google Scholar

Schorn, S. (2009) “Tears of the bereaved: Plutarch’s Consolatio ad uxorem in context”, in Fögen (2009), 335–365.Google Scholar

Schrader, C., Ramón, V., and Vela, J. (eds.) (1997) Plutarco y la Historia: Actas del V Simposio Español sobre Plutarco, Zaragoza 20–22 de junio de 1996. Zaragoza.Google Scholar

Schriefl, A. (2013) Platons Kritik an Geld und Reichtum. Berlin.Google Scholar

Schröder, S. (ed.) (1990) Plutarchs Schrift de Pythiae oraculis. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Schröder, S. (2010) “Plutarch on oracles and divine inspiration”, in Nesselrath (2010), 145–167.Google Scholar

Schroeter, J. (1911) Plutarchs Stellung zur Skepsis. Diss., University of Königsberg.Google Scholar

Schütrumpf, E. (1987) “The rhetra of Epitadeus: a Platonist’s fiction”, GRBS 28: 441–457.Google Scholar

Schwabl, H. (1962) “Das Bild der fremden Welt bei den frühen Griechen”, in , H. (eds.), Grecs et barbares. (Entretiens Hardt, VIII). Geneva, 1–36.Google Scholar

Schwartz, S. (2003) “Rome in the Greek novel? Images and ideas of empire in Chariton’s Persia”, Arethusa 36: 375–394.Google Scholar

Scott, R. (1981) “The classical tradition in Byzantine historiography”, in Mullett, M. and Scott, R. (eds.), Byzantium and the Classical Tradition. Birmingham, 61–74.Google Scholar

Seager, R. (1980) “Neu sinas Medos equitare inultos: Horace, the Parthians and Augustan foreign policy”, Athenaeum 58: 103–118.Google Scholar

Seavey, W. (1991) “Forensic epistolography and Plutarch’s de Herodoti malignitate”, Hellas 2: 33–45.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. (2012) The Philosophy of Antiochus. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Senzasono, L. (1997) “Health and politics in Plutarch’s De Tuenda Sanitate Praecepta”, in Mossman (1997a), 113–118.Google Scholar

Setton, K. (1956) “The Byzantine background to the Italian Renaissance”, PAPhS 100: 1–76.Google Scholar

Ševčenko, I. (1962) Études sur la polémique entre Théodore Métochite et Nicéphore Choumnos. Brussels.Google Scholar

Ševčenko, I. (1975) “Theodore Metochites, the Chora, and the intellectual trends of his time”, in Underwood, P. (ed.), The Kariye Djami, vol. IV: Studies in the Art of the Kariye Djami and Its Intellectual Background. Princeton, NJ: 19–91.Google Scholar

Ševčenko, I. (1992) “Re-reading Constantine Porphyrogenitus”, in Shepard, J. and Franklin, S. (eds.), Byzantine Diplomacy: Papers from the Twenty-Fourth Spring Symposium of Byzantine Studies, Cambridge, March 1990. Aldershot, 167–195.Google Scholar

Ševčenko, I. (ed.) (2011) Chronographiae quae Theophanis Continuati nomine fertur liber quo Vita Basilii imperatoris amplectitur (Corpus Fontium Historiae Byzantinae 42). Berlin.Google Scholar

Shepard, J. (ed.) (2008) The Cambridge History of the Byzantine Empire c. 500–1492. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Sheppard, A. (1984–6) “Homonoia in the Greek cities in the Roman empire”, AncSoc 15–17: 229–252.Google Scholar

Shipley, D. (1997) Plutarch’s Life of Agesilaos: Response to Sources in the Presentation of Character. Oxford.Google Scholar

Shumate, N. (1996) Crisis and Conversion in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar

Simonetti, E. (2017) A Perfect Medium? Oracular Divination in the Thought of Plutarch. Leuven.Google Scholar

Simpson, A. (2019) “Precepts, paradigms and evaluations: Niketas Choniates’ use of Plutarch”, in Xenophontos and Oikonomopoulou (2019), 279–294.Google Scholar

Sinor, D. (1957) “Les Barbares”, Diogène 18: 52–68.Google Scholar

Sion-Jenkis, K. (2000) Von der Republik zum Prinzipat: Ursachen für den Verfassungswechsel in Rom im historischen Denken der Antike. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Sirinelli, J. (2000) Plutarque de Chéronée: Un philosophe dans le siècle. Paris.Google Scholar

Slater, W. (ed.) (1991) Dining in a Classical Context. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar

Small, J. (1997) Wax Tablets of the Mind: Cognitive Studies of Memory and Literacy in Classical Antiquity. London.Google Scholar

Smith, R. (1992) “Photius on the ten orators”, GRBS 33: 159–189.Google Scholar

Smith, S. (2014) Man and Animal in Severan Rome: The Literary Imagination of Claudius Aelian. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Snell, B. (1954) “Zur Geschichte vom Gastmahl der Sieben Weisen”, in Hiltbrunner, O. (ed.), Thesaurismata: Festschrift für Ida Kapp zum 70. Geburtstag. Munich, 105–111.Google Scholar

Sorabji, R. (1983) Time, Creation, and the Continuum: Theories in Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages. London.Google Scholar

Sorabji, R. (1993) Animal Minds and Human Morals. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Sorabji, R. (1997) “Esprits d’animaux”, in Cassin, and Labarrière, (1997), 355–373.Google Scholar

Späth, T. (2007) “Blick auf Helden statt Blick auf Rom: Plutarchs Rezepte für ein globales Bankett der Moral”, in Freyburger, M.-L. and Meyer, D. (eds.), Visions grecques de Rome: Griechische Blicke auf Rom. Paris, 143–170.Google Scholar

Spawforth, A. (1994) “Symbol of unity? The Persian Wars tradition in the Roman Empire”, in Hornblower (ed.), S., Greek Historiography. Oxford, 233–247.Google Scholar

Spencer, T. (ed.) (1964) Shakespeare’s Plutarch. Harmondsworth.Google Scholar

Speyer, W. (1989) “Die Griechen und die Fremdvölker. Kulturbegegnungen und Wege zur gegenseitigen Verständigung”, Eos 77: 17–29.Google Scholar

Stadter, P. (1965) Plutarch’s Historical Methods: An Analysis of the Mulierum Virtutes. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Stadter, P. (1973a) “Planudes, Plutarch, and Pace of Ferrara”, IMU 16: 137–162.Google Scholar

Stadter, P. (1973b) “Thucydidean orators in Plutarch”, in Stadter, P. (ed.), The Speeches in Thucydides. Chapel Hill, NC, 109–123.Google Scholar

Stadter, P. (1975) “Plutarch’s comparison of Pericles and Fabius Maximus”, GRBS 16: 77–85. Reprinted in Scardigli (1995), 155–164.Google Scholar

Stadter, P. (1976) “Xenophon in Arrian’s Cynegeticus”, GRBS 17: 157–167.Google Scholar

Stadter, P. (1987) “The rhetoric of Plutarch’s Pericles”, AncSoc 18: 251–269.Google Scholar

Stadter, P. (1988) “The proems of Plutarch’s Lives”, ICS 13: 275–295.Google Scholar

Stadter, P. (1989) A Commentary on Plutarch’s Pericles. Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar

Stadter, P. (1992a) “Paradoxical paradigms: Lysander and Sulla”, in Stadter (1992b), 41–55. Reprinted in Stadter (2015a), 258–269.Google Scholar

Stadter, P. (ed.) (1992b) Plutarch and the Historical Tradition. London.Google Scholar

Stadter, P. (1995) “Subject to the erotic: male sexual behaviour in Plutarch”, in Innes, Hine, and Pelling (1995), 221–236.Google Scholar

Stadter, P. (1996) “Anecdotes and the thematic structure of Plutarchean biography”, in Fernández Delgado and Pordomingo Pardo (1996), 291–303.Google Scholar

Stadter, P. (1997) “Plutarch’s Lives: the statesman as moral actor”, in Schrader, Ramón, and Vela (1997), 65–81. Reprinted in Stadter (2015a), 215–230.Google Scholar

Stadter, P. (1999a) “Philosophos and philandros: Plutarch’s view of women in the Moralia and the Lives”, in Pomeroy (1999a), 173–182.Google Scholar

Stadter, P. (1999b) “Plato in Plutarch’s Lives of Lycurgus and Agesilaus”, in Pérez Jiménez, , García López, , and Aguilar, (eds.) 1999), 475–486.Google Scholar

Stadter, P. (1999c) “Drinking, table talk and Plutarch’s contemporaries”, in Montes Cala et al. (1999), 481–490. Reprinted in Stadter (2015a), 98–107.Google Scholar

Stadter, P. (2000) “The rhetoric of virtue in Plutarch’s Lives”, in Van der Stockt (2000b), 493–510. Reprinted in Stadter (2015a), 231–245.Google Scholar

Stadter, P. (2002) “Plutarch’s Lives and their Roman readers”, in Ostenfeld, E. N. (ed.), Greek Romans and Roman Greeks: Studies in Cultural Interaction. Aarhus, 123–135. Reprinted in Stadter (2015a), 45–55.Google Scholar

Stadter, P. (2003–4) “Mirroring virtue in Plutarch’s Lives”, Ploutarchos n.s. 1: 89–96.Google Scholar

Stadter, P. (2004) “Plutarch: diplomat for Delphi?” in de Blois et al. (2004), 19–31. Reprinted in Stadter (2015a), 70–81.Google Scholar

Stadter, P. (2005a) “Plutarco fra presente e passato”, in Jufresa et al. (2005a), 653–658.Google Scholar

Stadter, P. (2005b) “Revisiting Plutarch’s Lives of the Caesars”, in Pérez Jiménez and Titchener (2005), 405–422. Reprinted in Stadter (2015a), 56–69.Google Scholar

Stadter, P. (2008) “Notes and anecdotes: observations on cross-genre Apophthegmata”, in Nikolaidis (2008), 53–66.Google Scholar

Stadter, P. (2010) “Parallels in three dimensions”, in Humble (2010b), 197–216. Reprinted in Stadter (2015a), 286–302.Google Scholar

Stadter, P. (2010–11) “How to deal with the philosophical tradition? Some general rules in Plutarch’s anti-Epicurean treatises”, Ploutarchos 8: 133–146.Google Scholar

Stadter, P. (2011) “Competition and its costs: philonikia in Plutarch’s society and heroes”, in Roskam and Van der Stockt (2011), 237–255. Reprinted in Stadter (2015a), 270–285.Google Scholar

Stadter, P. (2012) “The philosopher’s ambition: Plutarch, Arrian and Marcus Aurelius”, in Roskam, De Pourcq and Van der Stockt (2012), 85–98. Reprinted in Stadter (2015a), 199–211.Google Scholar

Stadter, P. (2014) “Plutarch’s compositional technique: the anecdote collections and the Parallel Lives”, GRBS 54: 665–686.Google Scholar

Stadter, P. (2015a) Plutarch and His Roman Readers. Oxford.Google Scholar

Stadter, P. (2015b) “Friends or patrons?” in Stadter (2015a), 21–44.Google Scholar

Stadter, P. (2015c) “Plutarch’s Latin reading: Cicero’s Lucullus and Horace’s Epistle 1.6”, in Stadter (2015a), 130–148.Google Scholar

Stadter, P. (2017) “Discussing the past: moral vision, truth and benevolence in Plutarch’s On the Malice of Herodotus”, in Georgiadou and Oikonomopoulou (2017), 161–173.Google Scholar

Stadter, P. and Van der Stockt, L. (eds.) (2002) Sage and Emperor: Plutarch, Greek intellectuals and Roman Power in the time of Trajan (98–117 AD). Leuven.Google Scholar

Stamatopoulou, Z. (2014) “Hesiodic poetry and wisdom in Plutarch’s Symposium of the Seven Sages”, AJPh 135: 533–558.Google Scholar

Stanford, W. (1954) The Ulysses Theme. Oxford.Google Scholar

Stanton, G. (1973) “Sophists and philosophers: problems of classification”, AJPh 94: 350–364.Google Scholar

Steidle, W. (1951) Sueton und die antike Biographie. Munich.Google Scholar

Steiner, G. (2005) Anthropocentrism and Its Discontents: The Moral Status of Animals in the History of Western Philosophy. Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar

Steiner, G. (2008) “Das Tier bei Aristoteles und den Stoikern: Evolution eines kosmischen Prinzips”, in Alexandridis, Wild, and Winkler-Horaček (eds.), 27–46.Google Scholar

Steiner, G. (2009–10) “Plutarch on the question of justice for animals”, Ploutarchos 7: 73–82.Google Scholar

Stem, S. R. (2012) The Political Biographies of Cornelius Nepos. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar

Stevenson, R. (1997) Persica. Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Stok, F. (1998) “Le traduzioni latine dei Moralia di Plutarco”, Fontes 1: 117–136.Google Scholar

Strachey, L. (1928) Elizabeth and Essex. London.Google Scholar

Striker, G. (1991) “Following nature: a study in Stoic ethics”, OSAPh 9: 1–73.Google Scholar

Striker, G. (1994) “Plato’s Socrates and the Stoics”, in Vander Waerdt, P. (ed.), The Socratic Movement.Ithaca, NY, 241–251.Google Scholar

Strobach, A. (1997) Plutarch und die Sprachen: Ein Beitrag zur Fremdsprachenproblematik in der Antike. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Stronk, J. (2010) Ctesias’ Persian History: Introduction, Text, and Translation. Düsseldorf.Google Scholar

Swain, S. (1988) “Plutarch’s Philopoemen and Flamininus”, ICS 13: 335–347.Google Scholar

Swain, S. (1989a) “Plutarch’s Aemilius and Timoleon”, Historia 38: 314–334.Google Scholar

Swain, S. (1989b) “Character change in Plutarch”, Phoenix 43: 62–68.Google Scholar

Swain, S. (1990a) “Hellenic culture and the Roman heroes of Plutarch”, JHS 110: 126–145. Reprinted in Scardigli (1995), 229–264.Google Scholar

Swain, S. (1990b) “Plutarch’s Lives of Cicero, Cato, and Brutus”, Hermes 118: 192–203.Google Scholar

Swain, S. (1992a) “Plutarchan synkrisis”, Eranos 90: 101–111.Google Scholar

Swain, S. (1992b) “Plutarch’s characterization of Lucullus”, RhM 135: 307–316.Google Scholar

Swain, S. (1996) Hellenism and Empire: Language, Classicism, and Power in the Greek World, AD 50–250. Oxford.Google Scholar

Swain, S. (1997) “Plato, Plutarch, Athens and Rome”, in Barnes, J. and Griffin, M. (eds.), Philosophia Togata ii: Plato and Aristotle at Rome. Oxford, 165–187.Google Scholar

Swift, L. (2010) The Hidden Chorus: Echoes of Genre in Tragic Lyric. Oxford.Google Scholar

Syme, R. (1958) Tacitus. 2 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar

Tagliasacchi, A. (1960) “Plutarco e la tragedia greca”, Dioniso 34: 124–142.Google Scholar

Takho, T. and Lowe, E. (2015) “Ontological dependence”, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/dependence-ontological).Google Scholar

Taplin, O. (1986) “Fifth-century tragedy and comedy: a synkrisis”, JHS 106: 163–174. Reprinted in E. Segal (ed.) (1996) Oxford Readings in Aristophanes. Oxford, 9–28.Google Scholar

Tarrant, H. (1993) Thrasyllan Platonism. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Tarrant, H. (2000) Plato’s First Interpreters. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Tartaglia, L. (1987) “Il Saggio su Plutarco di Teodoro Metochita”, in Talariskos: Studia graeca Antonio Garzya sexagenario a discipulis oblata. Naples, 339–362.Google Scholar

Tatum, W. (2010) “Why parallel lives?” in Humble (2010b), 1–22.Google Scholar

Taufer, M. (1999) “Er e Tespesio: Plutarco interprete di Platone”, Lexis 17: 303–318.Google Scholar

Taylor, A. (2003) Animals and Ethics: An Overview of the Philosophical Debate. Peterborough.Google Scholar

Teague, F. (1992) “Letters and portents in Julius Caesar and King Lear”, Shakespeare Yearbook 3: 87–104.Google Scholar

Tecuşan, M. (1993) Symposion and Philosophy. D.Phil. thesis, Oxford University.Google Scholar

Teodorsson, S.-T. (1989) A Commentary on Plutarch’s Table Talks, vol. I. Gothenburg.Google Scholar

Teodorsson, S.-T. (1990) A Commentary on Plutarch’s Table Talks, vol. II. Gothenburg.Google Scholar

Teodorsson, S.-T. (1996) A Commentary on Plutarch’s Table Talks, vol. III. Gothenburg.Google Scholar

Teodorsson, S.-T. (1997) “Ethical historiography: Plutarch’s attitude to historical criticism”, in Schrader, Ramón, and Vela (1997), 439–447.Google Scholar

Teodorsson, S.-T. (1999) “Dionysus moderated and calmed”, in Montes Cala et al. (1999), 57–69.Google Scholar

Teodorsson, S.-T. (2000) “Plutarch’s use of synonyms: a typical feature of his style”, in Van der Stockt (2000b), 511–518.Google Scholar

Teodorsson, S.-T. (2005) “Plutarcho innovatore del vocabulario Greco”, in Pérez Jiménez and Titchener (2005), 405–418.Google Scholar

Teodorsson, S.-T. (2007–8) “Health is wealth: Plutarch on contemporary luxury”, Ploutarchos 5: 81–90.Google Scholar

Teodorsson, S.-T. (2009) “The place of Plutarch in the literary genre of symposium”, in Ribeiro Ferreira et al. (2009), 3–16.Google Scholar

Terian, A. (ed.) (1981) Philonis Alexandrini de Animalibus. Chico, CA.Google Scholar

Theander, C. (1951) Plutarch und die Geschichte. Lund.Google Scholar

Thériault, G. (1996) Le culte d’Homonoia dans les cités grecques. Lyon.Google Scholar

Thompson, L. (1979) “Strabo on civilization”, Platon 31: 213–219.Google Scholar

Thumiger, C. (2014a) “Animals in tragedy”, in Campbell (2014), 84–98.Google Scholar

Thumiger, C. (2014b) “Metamorphosis: human into animals”, in Campbell (2014), 384–413.Google Scholar

Timotin, A. (2012) La démonologie platonicienne. Histoire de la notion de daimōn de Platon aux derniers néoplatoniciens. Leiden.Google Scholar

Titchener, F. B. (1991) “Why did Plutarch write about Nicias?” AHB 5: 153–158.Google Scholar

Titchener, F. (1999) “Everything to do with Dionysus”, in Montes Cala et al. (1999), 491–499.Google Scholar

Titchener, F. (2008) “Is Plutarch’s Nicias devout, superstitious, or both?” in Nikolaidis (2008), 277–283.Google Scholar

Titchener, F. (2009) “The role of reality in Plutarch’s Quaestiones Convivales”, in Ribeiro Ferreira et al. (2009), 395–401.Google Scholar

Titchener, F. (2011) “Plutarch’s Table Talk: sampling a rich blend – a survey of scholarly appraisal”, in Klotz and Oikonomopoulou (2011a), 34–48.Google Scholar

Tovar Paz, F.-J. (1996) “El motivo de la ‘caza’ en De Sollertia Animalium de Plutarco”, in Fernández Delgado and Pordomingo Pardo (1996), 211–217.Google Scholar

Tozza, M. (2008–9) “Gli epiteti omerici nel Grillo di Plutarco: parallelismo simbolico tra animali e divinità”, Ploutarchos 6: 45–52.Google Scholar

Tozza, M. (2012) “Animali parlanti e giustizia in Plutarco ed Omero”, in Ribeiro Ferreira, Leão, and Martins de Jesus (2012), 191–199.Google Scholar

Trapp, M. (1999) “Socrates, the Phaedo and the Lives of Phocion and Cato the Younger”, in Pérez Jiménez, García López, and Aguilar (1999), 487–499.Google Scholar

Trapp, M. (2004) “Statesmanship in a minor key? The An seni and the Praecepta gerendae rei publicae”, in de Blois et al. (2004), 189–200.Google Scholar

Trapp, M. (2007) Philosophy in the Roman Empire: Ethics, Politics and Society. Aldershot.Google Scholar

Treadgold, W. (1980) The Nature of the Bibliotheca of Photius. Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Trego, K. (2012–13) “Competition in context: philonikia in Agesilaus–Pompey”, Ploutarchos 10: 63–74.Google Scholar

Tritle, L. (1988) Phocion the Good. London.Google Scholar

Tröster, M. (2008) Themes, Character, and Politics in Plutarch’s Life of Lucullus: The Construction of a Roman Aristocrat. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Tröster, M. (2009) “Banquet and philhellenism in the Lives of Flamininus and Aemilius Paullus”, in Ribeiro Ferreira et al. (2009), 165–179.Google Scholar

Tröster, M. (2012) “Plutarch and Mos Maiorum in the Life of Aemilius Paullus”, AncSoc 42: 219–254.Google Scholar

Tröster, M. (2014) “Cimone come benefattore panellenico e campione di concordia: Una proiezione di Plutarco?” RSA 44: 9–28.Google Scholar

Tsekourakis, D. (1983) Οἱ Λαϊκοφιλοσοφικὲς πραγματεῖες τοῦ Πλουτάρχου. Ἡ σχέση τους μὲ τὴ “διατριβὴ” καὶ μὲ ἄλλα παραπλήσια γραμματειακὰ εἴδη. (Ἀριστοτέλειο Πανεπιστήμιο Θεσσαλονίκης, Ἐπιστημονικὴ Ἐπετηρίδα Φιλοσοφικῆς Σχολῆς 34). Thessaloniki.Google Scholar

Tsekourakis, D. (1987) “Pythagoreanism or Platonism and ancient medicine? The reasons for vegetarianism in Plutarch’s Moralia”, ANRW II.36.1, 366–393.Google Scholar

Tsouvala, G. (2014) “Love and marriage”, in Beck (2014a), 191–206.Google Scholar

Tuplin, C. (1996) Achaemenid Studies. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Tutrone, F. (2012) Filosofi e animali in Roma antica: Modelli di animalità e umanità in Lucrezio e Seneca. Pisa.Google Scholar

Ullman, B. (1963) The Humanism of Coluccio Salutati. Padua.Google Scholar

Ungefehr-Kortus, C. (1996) Anacharsis, der Typus des edlen, weisen Barbaren – Ein Beitrag zum Verständnis griechischer Fremdheitserfahrung. Bern.Google Scholar

Ure, P. (1958) “Chapman’s use of North’s Plutarch in Caesar and Pompey”, Review of English Studies 9.35: 281–284.Google Scholar

Usener, H. (1887) Epicurea. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Uthemann, K.-H. and Görgemanns, H. (2006) “Diatribe”, in Cancik, H. and Schneider, H. (eds.), Brill’s New Pauly: Encyclopedia of the Ancient World, at https://referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/brill-s-new-pauly/diatribe-e316870. Leiden.Google Scholar

Valgiglio, E. (1975) “Basilio Magno Ad Adulescentes e Plutarco De Audiendis Poetis”, Rivista di Studi Classici 23: 67–85.Google Scholar

Valgiglio, E. (ed.) (1976) Plutarco: Praecepta gerendae reipublicae. Milan.Google Scholar

Valgiglio, E. (1982) “Alcuni aspetti di Cicerone come fonte di Plutarco”, in Studi in onore di Aristide Colonna. Perugia, 283–299.Google Scholar

Valgiglio, E. (1987) “Ιστορία e βίος in Plutarco”, Orpheus 8: 50–70.Google Scholar

Valgiglio, E. (ed.) (1989) Plutarco: Il progresso nella virtù (CPM 3). Naples.Google Scholar

Valgiglio, E. (1991) “La struttura del De audiendis poetis di Plutarco”, in D’Ippolito and Gallo (1991), 375–380.Google Scholar

Valgiglio, E. (1992) “Dagli ‘Ethicà’ ai ‘Bioi’ in Plutarco”, ANRW II.33.6, 3963–4051.Google Scholar

Vallozza, M. (1990) “Alcuni motivi del discorso di lode tra Pindaro e Isocrate”, QUCC 35: 43–58.Google Scholar

Vallozza, M. (1991) “Osservazioni sulle techniche argomentative nel discorso di lode nel De laude ipsius di Plutarco”, in D’Ippolito, and Gallo (1991), 327–334.Google Scholar

Vamvouri Ruffy, M. (2011) “Symposium, physical and social health in Plutarch’s Table Talk”, in Klotz and Oikonomopoulou (2011a), 131–157.Google Scholar

Vamvouri Ruffy, M. (2012) Les vertus thérapeutiques du banquet: médecine et idéologie dans les Propos de Table de Plutarque. Paris.Google Scholar

Van der Stockt, L. (1987) “Plutarch’s use of literature: sources and citations in the Quaestiones Romanae”, AncSoc 18: 281–292.Google Scholar

van der Stockt, L. (1990) “Plutarch on language”, in Swiggers, P. and Wouters, A. (eds.), Le langage dans l’Antiquité. Leuven, 180–196.Google Scholar

van der Stockt, L. (1992) Twinkling and Twilight: Plutarch’s Reflections on Literature. Brussels.Google Scholar

van der Stockt, L. (ed.) (1996) Plutarchea Lovaniensia: A Miscellany of Essays on Plutarch. Leuven.Google Scholar

van der Stockt, L. (1999a) “Plutarch on mania and its therapy”, in Montes Cala et al. (1999), 517–526.Google Scholar

van der Stockt, L. (1999b) “A Plutarchan hypomnema on self-love”, AJPh 120: 575–599.Google Scholar

van der Stockt, L. (1999c) “Three Aristotles equal but one Plato: on a cluster of quotations in Plutarch”, in Pérez Jiménez, García López, and Aguilar, (1999), 127–140.Google Scholar

van der Stockt, L. (2000a) “Aspects of the ethics and poetics of the dialogue in the Corpus Plutarcheum”, in Gallo, and Moreschini, (2000), 93–116.Google Scholar

van der Stockt, L. (ed.) (2000b) Rhetorical Theory and Praxis in Plutarch: Acta of the IVth International Congress of the International Plutarch Society, Leuven, July 3–6, 1996. Louvain.Google Scholar

van der Stockt, L. (2002) “Καρπὸς ἐκ φιλίας ἡγεμονικῆς (Mor. 814 C): Plutarch’s observations on the ‘old-boy network’”, in Stadter and Van der Stockt (2002), 115–140.Google Scholar

van der Stockt, L. (2003–4) “Odysseus in Rome: on Plutarch’s introduction to De cohibenda ira”, Ploutarchos 1: 107–116.Google Scholar

van der Stockt, L. (2004) “Plutarch in Plutarch: the problem of the hypomnemata”, in Gallo, I. (ed.), La biblioteca di Plutarco. Naples, 331–340.Google Scholar

van der Stockt, L. (2005) “‘Excludens amator’: Agesilaus fending off a kiss”, in Pérez Jiménez and Titchener (2005), 441–450.Google Scholar

van der Stockt, L. (2007) “‘God does not love birds’ (De gen. Socr. 593A): theophilia in Plutarch”, in Nieto Ibáñez and López López (2007), 199–207.Google Scholar

van der Stockt, L. (2008) “Self-esteem and image-building: on anger in De cohibenda ira and in some Lives”, in Nikolaidis (2008), 285–295.Google Scholar

van der Stockt, L. (2011) “Semper duo, numquam tres? Plutarch’s Popularphilosophie on friendship and virtue in On having many friends”, in Roskam and Van der Stockt (2011), 19–39.Google Scholar

van der Stockt, L. (2013) “Loyalty divided or doubled? Plutarch’s Hellenism saluting Rome”, in Schubert, P. (ed.), Les grecs héritiers des romains. (Entretiens Hardt, LIX). Geneva, 15–43.Google Scholar

van der Stockt, L. (2014) “Compositional methods in the Lives”, in Beck (2014a), 321–332.Google Scholar

van Emde Boas, E., Rijksbaron, A., Huitink, L., and De Bakker, M. (2019) Cambridge Grammar of Classical Greek. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Van Hoof, L. (2007) “Strategic differences: Seneca and Plutarch on controlling anger”, Mnemosyne 60: 59–86.Google Scholar

van Hoof, L. (2008), “Genres and their implications: meddlesomeness in On curiosity versus the Lives”, in Nikolaidis (2008), 297–310.Google Scholar

van Hoof, L. (2010) Plutarch’s Practical Ethics: The Social Dynamics of Philosophy. Oxford.Google Scholar

van Hoof, L. (2014) “Practical ethics”, in Beck (2014a), 135–148.Google Scholar

Van Meirvenne, B. (2002) “Plutarch on the healing power of (a tricky) παρρησία: observations on a political reading of De adultatore et amico”, in Stadter and Van der Stockt (2002), 141–160.Google Scholar

van Nijf, O. (2011) “Public space and the political culture of Roman Termessos”, in Nijf, Van and Alston (2011), 215–242.Google Scholar

van Nijf, O. and Alston, R. (eds.) (2011) Political Culture in the Greek City after the Classical Age. Leuven.Google Scholar

van Wees, H. (1992) Status Warriors: War, Violence and Society in Homer and History. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Vasoli, C. (1972) “Bruni, Leonardo”, in Dizionario Biografico degli Italiani. Vol. XIV. Rome, 618–633.Google Scholar

Vaughan, A. and Vaughan, V. (1991) Caliban: A Cultural History. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Vela Tejada, J. (2019) “Atticism in Plutarch: a μίμησις τῶν ἀρχαίων or diglossia?”, Euphrosyne 47: 295–308.Google Scholar

Verdegem, S. (2008) “Plutarch’s Quaestiones Romanae and his Lives of Early Romans”, in Nikolaidis (2008), 171–185.Google Scholar

Verdegem, S. (2010a) Plutarch’s Life of Alcibiades: Story, Text and Moralism. Leuven.Google Scholar

Verdegem, S. (2010b) “Parallels and contrasts: Plutarch’s Comparison of Coriolanus and Alcibiades”, in Humble (2010b), 23–44.Google Scholar

Verger, J. (1997) “Guarino de Vérone”, in Nativel, C. (ed.), Centuriae Latinae: Cent une figures humanistes de la Renaissance aux Lumières offertes à Jacques Chomarat. Geneva, 409–415.Google Scholar

Vernière, Y. (1977) Symboles et mythes dans la pensée de Plutarque. Paris.Google Scholar

Vetta, M. (ed.) (1983) Poesia e simposio nella Grecia antica: guida storica e critica. Rome.Google Scholar

Veyne, P. (1976) Le pain et le cirque: Sociologie historique d’un pluralisme politique. Paris.Google Scholar

Veyne, P. (1978) “La famille et l’amour sous le haut-empire romain”, Annales 33: 35–63.Google Scholar

Veyne, P. (1985) “L’empire romain, I”, in Duby, G. and Ariès, P. (eds.), Histoire de la vie privée, I: De l’empire romain à l’an mil. Paris, 19–223.Google Scholar

Veyne, P. (1988) Did the Greeks Believe in Their Myths? Trans. P. Wissing. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar

Veyne, P. (1990) Bread and Circuses: Historical Sociology and Political Pluralism. Trans. B. Pearce. London.Google Scholar

Veyne, P. (1999) “L’identité grecque devant Rome et l’empereur”, REG 112: 511–567.Google Scholar

Veyne, P. (2005) L’Empire gréco-romain. Paris.Google Scholar

Vickers, B. (ed.) (1996) Francis Bacon: A Critical Edition of the Major Works. Oxford.Google Scholar

Viti, P. (ed.) (1996) Leonardo Bruni: Opere letterarie e politiche. Turin.Google Scholar

Vlassopoulos, K. (2013) Greeks and Barbarians. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Volpe Cacciatore, P. (ed.) (2009) Plutarco nelle traduzioni latine di età umanistica. Naples.Google Scholar

Volpe Cacciatore, P. (2017) “Gli animale e gli uomini in Plutarco”, in Morales, M. Sanz, González Delgado, R., Librán Moreno, M., and Ureña Bracero, J. (eds.), La (inter)textualidad en Plutarco. Cáceres, 383–389.Google Scholar

Volpe Cacciatore, P. and F. Ferrari (eds.) (2007) Plutarco e la cultura della sua età. Atti del X Convegno plutarcheo, Fisciano-Paestum, 27–29 ottobre 2005. Naples.Google Scholar

Voltaire, (1957) Oeuvres historiques, ed. Pomeau, R.. Paris.Google Scholar

von Arnim, H. (ed.) (1903) Stoicorum veterum fragmenta. Vol. I. Lepzig.Google Scholar

Waith, E. (1962) The Herculean Hero in Marlowe, Chapman, Shakespeare and Dryden. London.Google Scholar

Wälchli, P. (2003) Studien zu den literarischen Beziehungen zwischen Plutarch und Lukian. Munich.Google Scholar

Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1983) Suetonius: The Scholar and His Caesars. London.Google Scholar

Wallace-Hadrill, A. (2008) Rome’s Cultural Revolution. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Walsh, J. (1992) “Syzygy, theme and history: a study in Plutarch’s Philopoemen and Flamininus”, Philologus 136: 208–233.Google Scholar

Walter, G. (ed.) (1951) Les Vies des hommes illustres. Traduction de Jacques Amyot. 2 vols. Paris. 2nd ed. 1977.Google Scholar

Walton, F. (1965) “A neglected historical text”, Historia 14: 236–251.Google Scholar

Wankel, H. (ed.) (1976) Demosthenes: Rede für Ktesiphon über den Kranz. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Wardman, A. (1955) “Plutarch and Alexander”, CQ 5: 96–107.Google Scholar

Wardman, A. (1971) “Plutarch’s methods in the Lives”, CQ 21: 254–261.Google Scholar

Wardman, A. (1974) Plutarch’s Lives. London.Google Scholar

Warren, J. (2002) Epicurus and Democritean Ethics: An Archaeology of Ataraxia. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Waterfield, R. and Stadter, P. (eds.) (1998) Greek Lives: A Selection of Nine Greek Lives. Oxford.Google Scholar

Waterfield, R. and Stadter, P. (1999) Roman Lives: A Selection of Eight Roman Lives. Oxford.Google Scholar

Webb, R. (2006) “Fiction, mimesis and the performance of the Greek past in the Second Sophistic”, in Konstan, and Saïd, (2006), 27–46.Google Scholar

Wecowski, M. (2014) The Rise of the Greek Aristocratic Banquet. Oxford.Google Scholar

Wegehaupt, H. (1914) “Planudes und Plutarch”, Philologus 27: 244–252.Google Scholar

Weidner, E. (1913) “Barbaros”, Glotta 4: 303–304.Google Scholar

Weiss, R. (1953) “Lo studio di Plutarco nel trecento”, PP 8: 321–342.Google Scholar

Weiss, R. (1977) Medieval and Humanist Greek: Collected Essays. Padua.Google Scholar

Weissenberger, B. (1894). Die Sprache Plutarchs von Chaironeia und die pseudoplutarchische Schriften. Straubing.Google Scholar

Weisser, S. (2016) “The art of quotation: Plutarch and Galen against Chryisippus”, in Weisser and Thaler (2016), 203–229.Google Scholar

Weisser, S. and Thaler, N. (eds.) (2016) Strategies of Philosophical Polemics in Greek and Roman Philosophy. Leiden.Google Scholar

Wendel, C. (1950) “Planudes, Maximos”, RE 20.2: 2202–2253.Google Scholar

Westerink, L. (ed.) (1948) Michael Psellus: De omnifaria doctrina. Utrecht.Google Scholar

Westerink, L. (ed.) (1973) Nicétas Magistros: Lettres d’un exilé (928–946). Paris.Google Scholar

Whitmarsh, T. (2000) “The politics and poetics of parasitism: Athenaeus on parasites and flatterers”, in Braund and Wilkins (2000), 304–315.Google Scholar

Whitmarsh, T. (2001) Greek Literature and the Roman Empire: The Politics of Imitation. Oxford.Google Scholar

Whitmarsh, T. (2002) “Alexander’s Hellenism and Plutarch’s textualism”, CQ 52: 174–192.Google Scholar

Whitmarsh, T. (2005) The Second Sophistic. Oxford.Google Scholar

Whitmarsh, T. (2006a) “Quickening the classics: the politics of prose in Roman Greece”, in Porter (2006a), 353–374.Google Scholar

Whitmarsh, T. (2006b) “‘This in-between book’: language, politics and genre in the Agricola”, in McGing and Mossman (2006a), 305–333.Google Scholar

Whitmarsh, T. (2006c) “The sincerest form of imitation: Plutarch on flattery”, in Konstan, and Saïd, (2006), 93–111.Google Scholar

Whitmarsh, T. (2009) “Greece and Rome”, in Boys-Stones, Graziosi, and Vasunia (2009), 114–128.Google Scholar

Whittaker, J. (1969) “Ammonius on the Delphic E”, CQ 63: 185–192.Google Scholar

Wiedemann, T. (1986) “Between men and beasts: barbarians in Ammianus Marcellinus,” in Moxon, Smart, and Woodman (1986), 189–201.Google Scholar

Wiedemann, T. (1988) Greek and Roman Slavery. London.Google Scholar

Wildberger, J. (2008) “Beast or god? The intermediate status of humans and the physical basis of the Stoic scala naturae”, in Alexandridis, Wild, and Winkler-Horaček (2008), 47–70.Google Scholar

Wilken, U. (1906) “Hellenen und Barbaren”, Neue Jahrbücher für das klassische Altertum 17: 457–471.Google Scholar

Wilkins, J. (2008) “Animals in the Romano-Greek culture of the second century AD”, in Alexandridis, Wild, and Winkler-Horaček (2008), 315–328.Google Scholar

Wilson, N. (1967) “The libraries of the Byzantine world”, GRBS 8: 53–80.Google Scholar

Wilson, N. (1970) “The church and classical studies in Byzantium”, A&A 16: 68–77.Google Scholar

Wilson, N. (1975) “Maximus Planudes and a famous codex of Plutarch”, GRBS 16: 95–97.Google Scholar

Wilson, N. (1992) From Byzantium to Italy: Greek Studies in the Italian Renaissance. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar

Wilson, N. (1996) Scholars of Byzantium. London. First published 1983.Google Scholar

Winkler, J. (1985) Auctor and Actor: A Narratological Reading of Apuleius’ Golden Ass. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

Wirszubski, C. (1950) Libertas as a Political Idea at Rome during the Late Republic and Early Principate. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Witt, R. (1976) “Toward a biography of Coluccio Salutati”, Rinascimento 16: 19–34.Google Scholar

Witt, R. (1978) “Salutati and Plutarch,” in S. Bertelli and G. Ramakus (eds.), Essays Presented to Myron P. Gilmore: Vol. I. Florence, 335–346.Google Scholar

Witt, R. (1983) Hercules at the Crossroads: The Life, Works and Thought of Coluccio Salutati. Durham, NC.Google Scholar

Witt, R. (1996) “Introduction: Hans Baron’s renaissance humanism” and “The crisis after forty years”, The American Historical Review 101: 107–118.Google Scholar

Witt, R. (1999) “Hans Baron”, in Grendler, P. (ed.), Encyclopedia of the Renaissance: Vol. V. New York, 299–300.Google Scholar

Witt, R. (2000) In the Footsteps of the Ancients: The Origins of Humanism from Lovato to Bruni. Leiden.Google Scholar

Wofford, S. (1997) “Antony’s Egyptian Bacchanals: heroic and divine impersonation in Shakespeare’s Plutarch and Antony and Cleopatra”, in McGrail (1997), 33–67.Google Scholar

Wohl, V. (1997) “Scenes from a marriage: love and logos in Plutarch’s Conjugalia Praecepta”, Helios 24: 170–192.Google Scholar

Woolf, G. (1993) “Roman peace”, in Rich and Shipley (1993), 171–194.Google Scholar

Worth, V. (1986) “Les Fortunes de Jacques Amyot en Angleterre”, in Balard (1986), 285–296.Google Scholar

Wyttenbach, D. (1843) Lexicon Plutarcheum et Vitas et Moralia complectens. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Xenophontos, S. (2012) “Comedy in Plutarch’s Parallel Lives”, GRBS 52: 603–631.Google Scholar

Xenophontos, S. (2013) “Imagery and education in Plutarch”, CPh 108: 126–138.Google Scholar

Xenophontos, S. (2014a) “Resorting to rare sources of antiquity: Nikephoros Basilakes and the popularity of Plutarch’s Parallel Lives in twelfth-century Byzantium”, Parekbolai 4: 1–12.Google Scholar

Xenophontos, S. (2014b) Review of Beck (2014a), BMCR 2014.09.38.Google Scholar

Xenophontos, S. (2016) Ethical Education in Plutarch: Moralising Agents and Contexts. Berlin.Google Scholar

Xenophontos, S. (2018) “The Byzantine Plutarch: self-identity and model in Theodore Metochites’ Essay 71 of the Semeioseis gnomikai”, in North and Mack (2018), 23–39.Google Scholar

Xenophontos, S. (2019) “Plutarch and Theodore Metochites”, in Xenophontos and Oikonomopoulou (2019), 310–323.Google Scholar

Xenophontos, S. and Oikonomopoulou, K. (eds.) (2019) Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Plutarch. Leiden.Google Scholar

Yaginuma, S. (1992) “Plutarch’s language and style”, ANRW II. 33.6, 4726–4742.Google Scholar

Yunis, H. (2003) “Writing for reading: Thucydides, Plato and the emergence of the critical reader”, in Yunis, H. (ed.), Written Texts and the Rise of Literate Culture in Ancient Greece. Cambridge, 189–212.Google Scholar

Zadorojnyi, A. (1997a) “Tragedy and epic in Plutarch’s Crassus”, Hermes 125: 169–182.Google Scholar

Zadorojnyi, A. (1997b) “The Roman poets in Plutarch’s stories”, in Schrader, Ramón, and Vela (1997), 497–506.Google Scholar

Zadorojnyi, A. (2002) “Safe drugs for the good boys: Platonism and pedagogy in Plutarch’s De audiendis poetis”, in Stadter and Van der Stockt (2002), 297–314.Google Scholar

Zadorojnyi, A. (2006a) “King of his castle: Plutarch, Demosthenes 1–2”, CCJ 52: 102–127.Google Scholar

Zadorojnyi, A. (2006b) “Plutarch’s Themistocles and the poets”, AJPh 127: 261–292.Google Scholar

Zadorojnyi, A. (2007) “Cato’s suicide in Plutarch”, CQ 57: 216–230.Google Scholar

Zadorojnyi, A. (2010) “ὥσπερ ἐν ἐσόπτρῳ: The rhetoric and philosophy of Plutarch’s mirrors”, in Humble (2010b), 169–195.Google Scholar

Zadorojnyi, A. (2011) “The ethico-politics of writing in Plutarch’s Life of Dion”, JHS 131: 147–163.Google Scholar

Zadorojnyi, A. (2012) “Mimesis and the (plu)past in Plutarch’s Lives”, in Grethlein, J. and Krebs, C. (eds.), Time and Narrative in Ancient Historiography: The “Plupast” from Herodotus to Appian. Cambridge, 175–198.Google Scholar

Zadorojnyi, A. (2014) “Kratein onomatôn: language and value in Plutarch”, in Beck (2014a), 304–320.Google Scholar

Zadorojnyi, A. (2018a) “Plutarch à la Russe: ancient heroism and Russian ideology in Tolstoy’s War and Peace”, in North and Mack (2018), 149–178.Google Scholar

Zadorojnyi, A. (2018b) “Plutarch’s heroes and the ‘biographical synecdoche’”, in F. Cairns and T. Luke (eds.), Ancient Biography: Identity through Lives. Tallahassee, FL, 241–259.Google Scholar

Zadorojnyi, A. (2019) “Heroism, apophthegms, and the Plutarchan hypotext in Tolstoy’s War and Peace”, in Tilg, S. and Novokhatko, A. (eds.), Antikes Heldentum in der Moderne: Konzepte, Praktiken, Medien. Freiburg, 17–34.Google Scholar

Zadorojnyi, A. (2020) “Greek and Latin biography”, updated version, in R. Scodel (ed.), Oxford Bibliographies Online (Classics) (https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/page/classics).Google Scholar

Zanker, P. (1988) The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar

Zeller, E. (1868) Die Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung (Dritter Theil, Zweite Abtheilung, Die nacharistotelische Philosophie, zweite Hälfte). Leipzig.Google Scholar

Ziegler, K. (1949) Plutarchos von Chaironeia. (Separatdruck RE XXI.1). Stuttgart. Reprinted as Ziegler (1951).Google Scholar

Ziegler, K. (1951) “Plutarchos von Chaironeia”, RE XXI.1: 636–962.Google Scholar

Ziegler, K. (1964) Plutarchos von Chaironeia. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Zuiderhoek, A. (2008) “On the political sociology of the imperial Greek city”, GRBS 48: 417–445.Google Scholar

Book contents

Bibliography

Summary

Access options

References

Book contents

Bibliography

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive