Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:39:09.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2021

Edited by
Sophia M. Connell
Sophia M. Connell
Affiliation:
Birkbeck College, University of London
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle's Biology , pp. 310 - 343
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Accattino, P. and Donini, P. 1996. Alessandro di Afrodisia. L’anima (Bari: Laterza).Google Scholar
Ackrill, J. L. 1972–1973. “Aristotle’s Definitions of Psuchê,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 73: 119–133.Google Scholar
Ackrill, J. L. 1981. Aristotle the Philosopher (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Althoff, J. 1999. “Aristoteles als Medizindoxograph,” in van der Eijk, P. (ed.), Ancient Histories of Medicine. Essays in Medical Doxography and Historiography in Classical Antiquity (Leiden: Brill), 57–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, K. 2016. “Animal Cognition,” in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/cognition-animal.Google Scholar
Angioni, L. 2016. “Aristotle’s Definition of Scientific Knowledge,” Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy 19: 140–166.Google Scholar
Annas, J. 1982. “Aristotle on Inefficient Causes,” Philosophical Quarterly 32(129): 311–326.Google Scholar
Aubert, H. and Wimmer, Fr. 1860. Aristoteles. Peri Zôiôn Geneseôs (Leipzig: Engelmann).Google Scholar
Aubert, H. and Wimmer, Fr. 1868. Aristoteles. Historiai Peri Zôôn (Leipzig: Engelmann).Google Scholar
Austin, C. 2017. “Aristotelian Essentialism: Essence in the Age of Evolution,” Synthese 194: 2539–2556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, C. and Marmodoro, A. 2018. “Structural Powers and the Homeodynamic Unity of Organisms,” in Simpson, W. M. R. R. C. Koons and N. J. Teh (eds.), Neo-Aristotelian Perspectives on Contemporary Science (Abingdon: Routledge), 169–184.Google Scholar
Ayala, F. 1970. “Teleological Explanations in Biology,” Philosophy of Science 37: 1–15.Google Scholar
Baghdassarian, F. 2016. La question du divin chez Aristote (Louvain-la-neuve: Peeters).Google Scholar
Baldry, H. C. 1932. “Embryological Analogies in Pre-Socratic Cosmology,” The Classical Quarterly 26(1): 27–34.Google Scholar
Balme, D. 1962. “GENOS and EIDOS in Aristotle’s Biology,” The Classical Quarterly 12(1): 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balme, D. 1972/1992. Aristotle. De Partibus Animalium I and De Generatione Animalium I (with passages from 2.1–3). Translated with Notes. With a Report on Recent Work and an Additional Bibliography (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Balme, D. 1987a. “The Place of Biology in Aristotle’s Philosophy,” in Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology (Cambridge University Press), 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balme, D. 1987b. “Aristotle’s Use of Division and Differentiae,” in Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology (Cambridge University Press), 69–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balme, D. 1987c. “Teleology and Necessity,” in Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology (Cambridge University Press), 275–286.Google Scholar
Balme, D. 1987d. “Aristotle’s Biology was not Essentialist,” in Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology (Cambridge University Press), 291–312.Google Scholar
Balme, D. 1991. Aristotle. Historia Animalium, Vol. 3: Books 7–10. LCL 439 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Balme, D. 2002. Aristotle: Historia Animalium, Vol. 1, Books I–9: Text. Prepared for publication by Allan Gotthelf (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Barnes, J. 1975/1993. Aristotle: Posterior Analytics. Translation with commentary (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Barnes, J. 1984. Aristotle: Complete Works (Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Barney, R. 2008. “Aristotle’s Argument for the Human Function,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 34: 293–322.Google Scholar
Barsanti, G. 1994. “Lamarck and the Birth of Biology 1740–1810,” in Poggi, S. and Bossi, M. (eds.), Romanticism in Science: Science in Europe, 1790–1840 (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 47–74.Google Scholar
Bartoš, H. 2010. “Aristotle and his Hippocratic Precursors on Health and Natural Teleology,” Rhizai 7: 7–27.Google Scholar
Bartoš, H. 2014. “Aristotle and the Hippocratic De Victu on Innate Heat and the Kindled Soul,” Ancient Philosophy 34: 1–27.Google Scholar
Bartoš, H. 2015. Philosophy and Dietetics in the Hippocratic On Regimen: A Delicate Balance of Health (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar
Bartoš, H. 2020. “Heat, Pneuma and Soul in the Medical Tradition,” in Bartoš, H. and King, C. G. (eds.), Heat, Pneuma, and Soul in Ancient Philosophy and Medicine (Cambridge University Press), 21–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartoš, H. 2021. “Aristotle and his Medical Precursors on Digestion and Nutrition,” in Lo Presti, R. and Korobili, G. (eds.), Nutrition and Nutritive Soul in Aristotle and Aristotelianism (Berlin: De Gruyter), 127–152.Google Scholar
Bartoš, H. and King, C. G. (eds.) 2020. Heat, Pneuma, and Soul in Ancient Philosophy and Science (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Beatty, J. 1985. “Speaking of Species: Darwin’s Strategy,” in Kohn, D. (ed.), The Darwinian Heritage (Cambridge University Press), 265–280.Google Scholar
Bechtel, W. and Richardson, R. 1993. “Emergent Phenomena and Complex Systems,” in Beckermann, A., Flohr, H., and Kim, J. (eds.), Emergence or Reduction? Essays on the Prospects of Nonreductive Physicalism (Berlin and New York: De Gruyter), 257–288.Google Scholar
Beere, J. 2009. Doing and Being. An Interpretation of Aristotle’s Metaphysics Theta (Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bemer, K. 2014. “A Philosophical Examination of Aristotle’s History of Animals.” Dissertation (University of Pittsburgh: http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/22674).Google Scholar
Beran, M., Brandl, J., Perner, J., and Proust, J. 2012. The Foundations of Metacognition (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Berryman, S. 2003. “Ancient Automata and Mechanical Explanation,” Phronesis 48: 344–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betegh, G. 2010. “What Makes a Myth ΕΙΚΩΣ? Remarks Inspired by Myles Burnyeat’s ‘ΕΙΚΩΣ ΜΥΘΟΣ’,” in Mohr, R. D. and Sattler, B. M. (eds.), One Book, the Whole Universe: Plato’s Timaeus Today (Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing), 213–226.Google Scholar
Betegh, G. 2020. “Fire, Heat and Motive Cause in Early Greek Philosophy and Medicine,” in Bartoš, H. and King, C. G. (eds.), Heat, Pneuma, and Soul in Ancient Philosophy and Medicine (Cambridge University Press), 35–60.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, H. J. 1990. “Themistius: The Last Peripatetic Commentator on Aristotle?,” in Sorabji, R. (ed.), Aristotle Transformed: The Ancient Commentators and Their Influence (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press), 113–123.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, H. J. 1996. Aristotle and Neoplatonism in Late Antiquity: Interpretations of the De Anima (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Bodéüs, R. 1995. “L’influence historique du Stoïcisme sur l’interpretation de l’oeuvre philosophique d’Aristote,” Revue des Sciences Philosophiques et Theologiques 79: 553–586.Google Scholar
Bodéüs, R. 2000. Aristotle and the Theology of the Living Immortals (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press).Google Scholar
Bodnár, I. 2005. “Teleology Across Natures,” Rhizai 2: 9–29.Google Scholar
Bodson, L. 1983. “Aristotle’s Statement on the Reproduction of Sharks,” Journal of the History of Biology 16: 391–407.Google Scholar
Bolhuis, J. J., Okanoya, K., and Scharff, C. 2010. “Twitter Evolution: Converging Mechanisms in Birdsong and Human Speech,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 11(11): 747–759.Google Scholar
Bolton, R. 1978. “Aristotle’s Definitions of the Soul: De Anima II, 1–3,” Phronesis 23(3): 258–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, R. 1987. “Definition and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics and Generation of Animals,” in Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology (Cambridge University Press), 120–166.Google Scholar
Bolton, R. 2015. “The Origins of Aristotle’s Natural Teleology in Physics II,” in Leunissen, M. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics: A Critical Guide (Cambridge University Press), 121–143.Google Scholar
Bolton, R. 2018. “The Search for Principles in Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics 2 and Generation of Animals 1,” in Falcon, A. and Lefebvre, D. (eds.), Aristotle’s Generation of Animals: A Critical Guide (Cambridge University Press), 227–248.Google Scholar
Bolton, R. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.) 2010. Being, Nature, and Life. Essays in Honor of Allan Gotthelf (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Boudon-Millot, V. (ed.) 2007. Galien Tome I: Introduction générale, sur l’ordre de ses propres livre; Sur ses propres livres; Que l’excellent médicin est aussi philosophe (Paris: Les Belles Lettres).Google Scholar
Brandon, R. 1981. “Biological Teleology: Questions and Explanations,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 12: 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brill, S. 2019. “Aristotle’s Meta-Zoology: Shared Life and Human Animality in the Politics,” in Bianchi, E., Brill, S., and Holmes, B. (eds.), Antiquities Beyond Humanism (Oxford University Press), 97–121.Google Scholar
Broadie, S. 1991. Ethics with Aristotle (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1985. Greek Religion (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. 1992/1995. “Is an Aristotelian Philosophy of Mind Still Credible? (A Draft),” in Nussbaum, M. C. and Rorty, A. O. (eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima (Oxford University Press), 15–26.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. 1995. “How Much Happens When Aristotle Sees Red and Hears Middle C? Remarks on De Anima 2.7–8,” in Nussbaum, M. C. and Rorty, A. O. (eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima (Oxford University Press), 421–434.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. 2001. A Map of Metaphysics Zeta (Pittsburgh, PA: Mathesis Publications).Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. 2004. “Introduction: Aristotle on the Foundations of Sublunary Physics,” in De Haas, F. and Mansfeld, J. (eds), Aristotle’s On Generation and Corruption I (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 7–24.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. 2005. “ΕΙΚΩΣ ΜΥΘΟΣ,” Rhizai 2: 143–165. Reprinted in C. Partenie (ed.) 2009. Plato’s Myths (Cambridge University Press), 167–186.Google Scholar
Butterfield, H. 1931. The Whig Interpretation of History (London: G. Bell).Google Scholar
Butterfield, H. 1949. The Origins of Modern Science (London: G. Bell).Google Scholar
Byl, S. 1980. Recherches sur les grands traités biologiques d’Aristote (Brussels: Palais des Académies).Google Scholar
Cagnoli Fiecconi, E. 2018. “Enmattered Virtues,” Metaphysics 1(1): 63–74.Google Scholar
Cameron, R. 2010. “Aristotle’s Teleology,” Philosophical Compass 5: 1096–1106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, G. L. 2006. Strange Creatures: Anthropology in Antiquity (London: Duckworth).Google Scholar
Carbone, A. L. 2011. Aristote illustré. représentations du corps et schématisation dans la biologie aristotélicienne (Paris: Garnier).Google Scholar
Carpenter, A. D. 2008. “Embodying Intelligence: Animals and Us in Plato’s Timaeus,” in Zovko, J. and Dillon, J. (eds.), Platonism and Forms of Intelligence (Sankt Augustin: Akademie Verlag), 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, A. D. 2010. “Embodied Intelligent (?) Souls: Plants in Plato’s Timaeus,” Phronesis 55: 281–303.Google Scholar
Caston, V. 2005. “The Spirit and the Letter: Aristotle on Perception,” in Salles, R. (ed.), Metaphysics, Soul, and Ethics: Themes from the Work of Richard Sorabji (Oxford University Press), 245–320.Google Scholar
Cerami, C. 2018. “Function and Instrument: Towards a New Criterion of the Scale of Being in Aristotle’s Generation of Animals,” in Falcon, A. and Lefebvre, D. (eds.), Aristotle’s Generation of Animals: A Critical Guide (Cambridge University Press), 130–150.Google Scholar
Cerami, C. and Falcon, A. 2014. “Continuity and Discontinuity in the Greek and Arabic Reception of Aristotle’s Study of Animals,” Philosophia Antiquorum 8: 35–56.Google Scholar
Chalmers, D. 1995. “Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness,” Journal of Consciousness Studies 2(3): 200–219.Google Scholar
Charles, D. 1988. “Aristotle on Hypothetical Necessity and Irreducibility,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 69: 1–53. Reprinted in T. Irwin (ed.), Classical Philosophy. Collected Papers (Abingdon: Routledge), 27–80.Google Scholar
Charles, D. 1990. “Aristotle on Meaning, Natural Kinds and Natural History,” in Devereux, D. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.), Biologie, Logique et Métaphysique chez Aristote (Paris: Éditions du CNRS), 145–167.Google Scholar
Charles, D. 1999. “Aristotle on Well-Being and Intellectual Contemplation: David Charles,” Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 73(1): 205–223.Google Scholar
Charles, D. 2000. Aristotle on Meaning and Essence (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Charles, D. 2012. “Teleological Causation,” in Shields, C. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Aristotle (Oxford University Press), 227–266.Google Scholar
Charles, D. 2014. Definition in Greek Philosophy (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Charlton, W. 1992/1970. Aristotle’s Physics 1 and 2. Translated with Introduction, Commentary, Note on Recent Work, and Revised Bibliography (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Chirimuuta, M. 2015. Outside Color: Perceptual Science and the Puzzle of Color in Philosophy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
Clark, W. R. 1996. Sex and the Origin of Death (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Clayton, E. 2008. “Aesop, Aristotle, and Animals: The Role of Fables in Human Life,” Humanitas: Interdisciplinary Journal (National Humanities Institute) 21(2): 179–200.Google Scholar
Code, A. 1987. “Soul as Efficient Cause in Aristotle’s Embryology,” Philosophical Topics 15: 51–59.Google Scholar
Code, A. 1997. “The Priority of Final Causes Over Efficient Causes in Aristotle’s Parts of Animals,” in Kullmann, W. and Föllinger, S. (eds.), Aristotelische Biologie (Stuttgart: Steiner), 127–143.Google Scholar
Code, A. 2004. “On Generation and Corruption I.5,” in de Haas, F. A. J. and Mansfeld, J. (eds.), Aristotle, De Generatione et Corruptione I. Proceedings of the Symposium Aristotelicum (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Coleman, W. 1977. Biology in the Nineteenth Century: Problems of Form, Function, and Transformation (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Coles, A. 1995. “Biomedical Models of Reproduction in the Fifth Century BC and Aristotle’s Generation of Animals,” Phronesis 40: 48–88.Google Scholar
Coles, A. 1997. “Animal and Childhood Cognition in Aristotle’s Biology and the Scala Naturae,” in Kullmann, W. and Föllinger, S. (eds.), Aristotelische Biologie: Intentionen, Methoden, Ergebnisse (Stuttgart: Steiner), 287–324.Google Scholar
Coles, E. 1992. “Theophrastus and Aristotle on Animal Intelligence,” in Fortenbaugh, W. and Gutas, D. (eds.), Theophrastus, His Psychological, Doxographical and Scientific Writings (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press).Google Scholar
Collobert, C. 2002. “Aristotle’s Review of the Presocratics: Is Aristotle Finally a Historian of Philosophy?” Journal of the History of Philosophy 40: 281–295.Google Scholar
Connell, S. 2001. “An Integrated Approach to Aristotle as a Biological Philosopher,” Review of Metaphysics 55: 297–322.Google Scholar
Connell, S. 2016. Aristotle on Female Animals: A Study of the Generation of Animals (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connell, S. 2018a. “Aristotle’s Explanations of Monstrous Births and Deformities in Generation of Animals 4.4,” in Falcon, A. and Lefebvre, D. (eds.), Aristotle’s Generation of Animals: A Critical Guide (Cambridge University Press), 207–223.Google Scholar
Connell, S. 2018b. “From Natural Character to Moral Virtue in Aristotle, by Mariska Leunissen,” Mind 127(507): 938–946.Google Scholar
Connell, S. 2019. “Mothering and Intelligence in Aristotle’s Biology and Ethics,” in Sfendoni-Mentzou, D. (ed.), Proceedings of Aristotle World Congress (Thessaloniki, Greece: University of Thessaloniki), 122–127.Google Scholar
Connell, S. 2020. “Nutritive and Sentient Soul in Aristotle’s Generation of Animals II.5,” Phronesis 65(4): 324–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connell, S. 2021. “The Female Contribution to Generation and the Nutritive Soul in Aristotle’s Embryology,” in Lo Presti, R. and Korobili, G. (eds.), Nutrition and Nutritive Soul in Aristotle and Aristotelianism (Berlin: De Gruyter), 63–84.Google Scholar
Cook, K. 1996. “Sexual Inequality in Aristotle’s Theories of Reproduction and Inheritance,” in Ward, J. K. (ed.), Feminism and Ancient Philosophy (Abingdon: Routledge), 51–67.Google Scholar
Coope, U. 2009. “Change and its Relation to Actuality and Potentiality,” in Anagnostopoulos, G. (ed.), Companion to Aristotle (Chichester, UK: Wiley), 277–291.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. 1982. “Aristotle on Natural Teleology,” in Schofield, M. and Nussbaum, M. (eds.), Language and Logos (Cambridge University Press), 197–222.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. 1987. “Hypothetical Necessity and Natural Teleology,” in Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology (Cambridge University Press), 243–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, J. 1988a. “Metaphysics in Aristotle’s Embryology,” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 34: 14–31.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. 1988b. “Political Animals and Civic Friendship,” in Cooper, J., Reason and Emotion: Essays on Ancient Moral Psychology and Ethical Theory (Princeton University Press), 356–378.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. 1997. Plato: Complete Works (Bloomington, IN: Hackett).Google Scholar
Corcilius, K. 2008a. Streben und Bewegen. Aristoteles. Theorie der Animalischen Ortsbewegung. Quellen und Studien zur Philosophie (Berlin: De Gruyter).Google Scholar
Corcilius, K. 2008b. “Two Jobs for Aristotle’s Practical Syllogism?,” Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy 11: 163–184.Google Scholar
Corcilius, K. 2008c. “Aristoteles’ Praktische Syllogismen in der Zweiten Hälfte des 20. Jahrhunderts,” Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy 11: 101–132.Google Scholar
Corcilius, K. 2011. “Aristotle’s Notion of Non-Rational Desire,” in Miller, J. (ed.) Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. A Critical Guide (Cambridge University Press), 117–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corcilius, K. 2014. “Activity, Passivity, and Perceptual Discrimination in Aristotle,” in Silva, J. F. and Yrjönsuuri, M. (eds.) Active Perception in the History of Philosophy (New York: Springer), 31–53.Google Scholar
Corcilius, K. Forthcoming. “GA V as a Coda,” in Föllinger, S. and Busch, T. (eds.), Aristotle’s Generation of Animals: A Comprehensive Approach (Stuttgart: Steiner).Google Scholar
Corcilius, K. and Gregorić, O. 2010. “Separability vs. Difference: Parts and Capacities of the Soul in Aristotle,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 39: 81–120.Google Scholar
Corcilius, K. and Gregorić, O. 2013. “Aristotle’s Model of Animal Motion,” Phronesis 58(1): 52–97.Google Scholar
Corcilius, K. and Primavesi, O. 2018. Aristoteles. De Motu Animalium. Über die Bewegung der Lebewesen, Historisch-kritische Edition des Griechischen Textes mit Philologischem Kommentar von O. Primavesi. Deutsche Übersetzung, Philosophische Einleitung und Erklärende Anmerkungen von K. Corcilius (Hamburg: Meiner, Philosophische Bibliothek).Google Scholar
Corcilius, K. and Rapp, C. 2008. Beiträge zur Aristotelischen Handlungstheorie (Stuttgart: Steiner).Google Scholar
Cosans, C. 1998. “Aristotle’s Anatomical Philosophy of Nature,” Biology and Philosophy 13: 311–339.Google Scholar
Craik, E. 2001. “Plato and Medical Texts: Symposium 185c–193d,” The Classical Quarterly 51: 109–114.Google Scholar
Craik, E. 2006. “Tragedy as Treatment: Medical Analogies in Aristotle’s Poetics,” in Cairns, D. L. and Liapis, V. J. (eds.), Dionysalexandros: Essays on Aeschylus and His Fellow Tragedians, in Honour of Alexander F. Garvie (Swansea, UK: The Classical Press of Wales), 283–299.Google Scholar
Craik, E. 2015. The “Hippocratic” Corpus: Content and Context (Abingdon: Routledge).Google Scholar
Craik, E. 2017. “Teleology in Hippocratic Texts: Clues to the Future?” in J. Rocca (ed.) Teleology in the Ancient World. Philosophical and Medical Approaches (Cambridge University Press), 203–216.Google Scholar
Cunningham, A. 1997. The Anatomical Renaissance: The Resurrection of the Anatomical Projects of the Ancients (Abingdon: Routledge).Google Scholar
Cunningham, A. 1999. “Aristotle’s Animal Book: Ethology, Biology, Anatomy, or Philosophy?” Philosophical Topics 27(1): 17–41.Google Scholar
Danchin, É., Pocheville, A., and Humeman, P. 2019. “Early in Life Effects and Heredity: Reconciling Neo-Darwinism with Neo-Lamarckism Under the Banner of the Inclusive Evolutionary Synthesis,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 374(1770): 20180113.Google Scholar
Dancy, R. 2016. “Speusippus,” in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 edition), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/speusippus.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1859/1968. The Origin of Species (London: John Murray).Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1862. On the Various Contrivances by Which Orchids Are Fertilised (London: John Murray), http://darwinonline.org.uk/content/frameset?pageseq=1&itemID=F800&viewtype=text.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1868. The Variation of Animals and Plants Under Domestication (London: John Murray), http://darwin-online.org.uk/converted/pdf/1868_Variation_F877.1.pdf, Darwin Correspondence Project (DCP) www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letters.Google Scholar
1961. Darwin to Gray, May 22. Darwin Correspondence Project, DCP 2814, www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letters.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 2005. “Aristotle’s Action,” in D. Davidson, Truth, Language and History: Philosophical Essays (Oxford University Press), 277–294.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. 1976. The Selfish Gene, 1st ed. (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. 1989. The Selfish Gene, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. 2006. The God Delusion (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin).Google Scholar
Dean-Jones, L. A. 1994. Women’s Bodies in Ancient Greek Science (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Dean-Jones, L. A. 2012. “Clinical Gynecology and Aristotle’s Biology: The Composition of HA X,” Apeiron 45: 180–200.Google Scholar
Dean-Jones, L. A. 2021. Aristotle’s Historia Animalium Book X, Text, Translations and Commentary (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
de Haas, F. and Mansfeld, J. 2004. Aristotle, De Generatione et Corruptione I. Proceedings of the Symposium Aristotelicum (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
De Lacy, P. (ed.) 1996. Galen, On the Elements According to Hippocrates. Edition, Translation and Commentary. Corpus Medicorum Graecorum V 1, 2 (Berlin: Akademie Verlag).Google Scholar
Delbrück, M. 1971. “Aristotle-totle-totle,” in Monod, J. and Borek, E. (eds.), Microbes and Life (New York: Columbia University Press), 50–55.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. 1987. The Intentional Stance (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
Depew, D. J. 1995. “Humans and Other Political Animals in Aristotle’s History of Animals,” Phronesis 40(2): 156–181.Google Scholar
Depew, D. J. 2008. “Consequence Etiology and Biological Teleology in Aristotle and Darwin,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38: 379–390.Google Scholar
Depew, D. J. 2010. “Incidental Causation, Spontaneous Generation, and Homonymous Predication in Aristotle’s Physics II and Other Texts,” in Föllinger, S. (ed.), Was Ist ‘Leben’? (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag), 285–287.Google Scholar
Depew, D. J. 2016. “Contingency, Chance, and Randomness in Ancient and Modern Biology,” in Ramsey, G. and Pence, C. (eds.), Chance in Evolution (University of Chicago Press), 115–140.Google Scholar
Deslauriers, M. 1990. “Plato and Aristotle on Division and Definition,” Ancient Philosophy, 10(2): 203–219.Google Scholar
Deslauriers, M. 2007. Aristotle on Definition (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar
Deslauriers, M. 2009. “Sexual Difference in Aristotle’s Politics and His Biology,” Classical World: A Quarterly Journal on Antiquity 102(3): 215–231.Google Scholar
Deslauriers, M. 2015. “Political Rule over Women in Politics I,” in Lockwood, T. and Samaras, T. (eds.), Aristotle’s Politics: A Critical Guide (Cambridge University Press), 46–63.Google Scholar
Devereux, D. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.) 1990. Biologie, Logique et Metaphysique chez Aristote (Paris: l’Editions de Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique).Google Scholar
Devitt, M. 2008. “Resurrecting Biological Essentialism,” Philosophy of Science 75(3): 344–382.Google Scholar
Devitt, M. 2018. “Individual Essentialism in Biology,” Biology and Philosophy 33(5–6): 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Vries, H. 1901–1903. Die Mutationstheorie, 2 vols. (Leipzig: Veit).Google Scholar
Diehl, E. (ed.) 1903–1906. Proclus, In Platonis Timaeum Commentaria, 3 vols. (Leipzig: Teubner).Google Scholar
Dirlmeier, F. 1937. Die Oikeiosis-Lehre Theophrastus, Philologus Supplement 30 (Leipzig: Dieterich).Google Scholar
Dittmeyer, L. 1907. Aristotelis de animalibus historia (Leipzig: Teubner).Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, T. 1937. Genetics and the Origin of Species (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, T. 1974. “Nothing in Evolution Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution,” American Biology Teacher 35: 125–129.Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. 1999. Antigone de Caryste. Fragments (Paris: Les Belles Lettres).Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. 2012. “Les Témoins et l’histoire du texte,” in Brisson, L., Aubry, G., Congourdeau, M.-H., and Hudry, F. (eds.), Porphyre: sur la manière dont l’embryon reçoit l’ âme (Paris: Vrin), 121–136.Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. 2017. “La Ricezione del Sapere Zoologico di Aristotele nella Tradizione Paradossografica,” in Sassi, M. M., Coda, E., and Feola, G. (eds.), La Zoologia di Aristotele e la sua ricezione dall’età ellenistica e romana alle culture medievali (Pisa University Press), 60–80.Google Scholar
Drossaart Lulofs, H. J. 1965a. De Generatione Animalium (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Drossaart Lulofs, H. J. 1965b. Nicolaus Damascenus on the Philosophy of Aristotle (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar
Drossaart Lulofs, H. J. 1985. “Aristotle, Bar Hebraeus and Nicolaus Damascenus on Animals,” in Gotthelf, A. (ed.), Aristotle on Nature and Living Things: Philosophical Studies Presented to David M. Balme (Pittsburgh, PA: Mathesis Publications), 345–357.Google Scholar
Dupré, J. 1993. The Disorder of Things (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Dupré, J. 2001. Humans and Other Animals (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Dupré, J. and Nicholson, D. 2018. “Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology,” in Nicholson, D. and Dupré, J. (eds.), Everything Flows: Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Düring, I. 1961. Aristotle’s Protrepticus: An Attempt at Reconstruction (Göteborg: Institute of Classical Studies).Google Scholar
Edelstein, I. 1967. Ancient Medicine (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar
Eden, J. 2015. “Are Women Passive? What History Says About Gender, Sexuality and Christian Ministry,” Priscilla Papers 29(3): 15–20.Google Scholar
Edwards, G. F. 2018. “Reincarnation, Rationality, and Temperance: Platonists on Not Eating Animals,” in Adamson, P. and Edwards, G. F. (eds.), Animals: A History (Oxford University Press), 27–56.Google Scholar
Ereshefsky, M. 2010. “What’s Wrong with the New Biological Essentialism,” Philosophy of Science, 7: 674–689.Google Scholar
Everson, S. 1995. “Proper Sensibles and Καθ ̓ Αὑτά Causes,” Phronesis 40(3): 265–292.Google Scholar
Everson, S. 1997. Aristotle on Perception (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Eycott, A., Daleszczyk, K., Drese, J., Cantero, A. S., Pèbre, J., and Gladys, S. 2013. “Defecation Rate in Captive European Bison, Bion Bonasus,” Acta Theriologica 58: 387–390.Google Scholar
Falcon, A. 2005. Aristotle and the Science of Nature: Unity Without Uniformity (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Falcon, A. 2014. “Aristotle’s Philosophy of Nature,” in Warren, J. and Sheffield, F. (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Ancient Philosophy (Abingdon: Routledge), 319–331.Google Scholar
Falcon, A. 2015. “Aristotle and the Study of Animals and Plants,” in Holmes, K. B. and Fisher, K. D. (eds.), Frontiers of Ancient Science. Essays in Honor of Heinrich von Staden (Berlin: De Gruyter), 75–91.Google Scholar
Falcon, A. 2017. “The Place of De Motu Animalium in Aristotle’s Natural Philosophy,” in Wians, W. and Polansky, R. (eds.), Reading Aristotle: Argument and Exposition (Leiden: Brill), 215–235.Google Scholar
Falcon, A. and Lefebvre, D. (eds.) 2018. Aristotle’s Generation of Animals: A Critical Guide (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Falcon, A. and Leunissen, M. 2015. “Eulogos in Natural Science,” in Ebrey, D. (ed.), Theory and Practices in Aristotle’s Natural Philosophy (Cambridge University Press), 217–240.Google Scholar
Festa, N. 1891. Iamblichi de Communi Mathematica Scientia Liber ad Fidem Codicis Florentini (Leipzig: Teubner).Google Scholar
Festugière, A. J. 1956. “Un fragment nouveau de ‘Protreptique’ d’Aristote,” Revue philosophique de la France et L’étranger 146: 117–127.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. 1930/2000. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection: A Complete Variorum Edition (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Föllinger, S. 1996. Differenz und Gleichheit: Das Geschlechterverhältnis in der Sicht griechischer Philosophen des 4. bis 1. Jahrhunderts v. Chr. Hermes Einzelschriften 74 (Stuttgart: Steiner).Google Scholar
Föllinger, S. (ed.) Forthcoming. Aristotle’s Generation of Animals: A Comprehensive Approach.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W. 1971. “Aristotle: Animals, Emotion and Moral Virtue,” Arethusa 4(2): 137–165.Google Scholar
Frede, D. 2013. “The Political Character of Aristotle’s Ethics,” in Deslauriers, M. and Destree, P. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle’s Politics (Cambridge University Press), 14–37.Google Scholar
Frede, M. 2008. “Aristotle’s Account of the Origins of Philosophy,” in Curd, P. and Graham, D. W. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy (Oxford University Press), 501–529.Google Scholar
Fredrich, C. 1899. Hippokratische Untersuchungen (Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung).Google Scholar
Freeland, C. 1987. “Aristotle on Bodies, Matter, and Potentiality,” in Lennox, J. G. and Gotthelf, A. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology (Cambridge University Press), 392–407.Google Scholar
Freeland, C. 1992. “Aristotle on the Sense of Touch,” in Nussbaum, M. C. and Rorty, A. O. (eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima (Oxford University Press), 227–248.Google Scholar
Freeland, C. 1994a. “Aristotle on Perception, Appetition, and Self-Motion,” in Gill, M. L. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Self-Motion. From Aristotle to Newton (Princeton University Press), 35–63.Google Scholar
Freeland, C. 1994b. “Nourishing Speculation: A Freeland Reading of Aristotelian Science,” in Bar-On, B. (ed.), Engendering Origins: Critical Feminist Readings in Plato and Aristotle (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press).Google Scholar
Freudenthal, G. 1999. Aristotle’s Theory of Material Substance: Heat and Pneuma, Form and Soul (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Frey, C. 2012. “Book Review of Leunissen, M. Explanation and Teleology in Aristotle’s Natural Science,” Classical Philology 107(2): 169–173.Google Scholar
Frey, C. 2015. “From Blood to Flesh: Homonomy, Unity and Ways of Being in Aristotle,” Ancient Philosophy 35(2): 375–394.Google Scholar
Frixione, E. 2013. “Pneuma–Fire Interactions in Hippocratic Physiology,” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 68: 505–528.Google Scholar
Fu, X. L. and Ares, M. 2014. “Context-Dependent Control of Alternative Splicing by RNA-Binding Proteins,” Nature Review Genetics 15: 689–701.Google Scholar
Furley, D. 1989. “The Mechanics of Meteorologica IV: A Prolegomenon to Biology,” in Furley, D., Cosmic Problems: Essays on Greek and Roman Philosophy of Nature (Cambridge University Press), chapter 12.Google Scholar
Furth, M. 1988. Substance, Nature and Psyche: An Aristotelian Metaphysics (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Gelber, J. 2010. “Form and Inheritance in Aristotle’s Embryology,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 39: 183–212.Google Scholar
Gelber, J. 2015a. “Aristotle on Essence and Habitat,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 58: 267–293.Google Scholar
Gelber, J. 2015b. “Are Facts About Matter Primitive?” in Ebrey, D. (ed.), Theory and Practice in Aristotle’s Natural Philosophy (Cambridge University Press), 46–60.Google Scholar
Gelber, J. 2018. “Females in Aristotle’s Embryology,” in Falcon, A. and Lefebvre, D. (eds.), Aristotle’s Generation of Animals: A Critical Guide (Cambridge University Press), 171–187.Google Scholar
Gemelli Marciano, M. L. 2005. “Empedocles’ Zoogony and Embryology,” in Pierris, A. L. (ed.), The Empedoclean Cosmos: Structure, Process and the Question of Cyclicity (Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research), 373–404.Google Scholar
Ghiselin, M. T. 1974. “A Radical Solution to the Species Problem,” Systematic Zoology 23: 536–544.Google Scholar
Gigon, O. 1987. Aristotelis Opera, Vol. 3: Librorum Deperditorum Fragmenta (Berlin: De Gruyter).Google Scholar
Gill, M. L. 1997. “Material Necessity in Meteorology IV.12,” in Kullmann, W. and Föllinger, S. (eds.), Aristotelische Biologie, Intentionen, Methode, Ergebnisse (Stuttgart: Steiner), 145–161.Google Scholar
Gill, M. L. 2014. “The Limits of Teleology in Aristotle’s Meteorology IV.12,” History of Philosophy of Science 4(2): 335–350.Google Scholar
Gill, M. L. and Lennox, J. G. 1994. Self-Motion: From Aristotle to Newton (Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Glock, H.-J. 2019. “Aristotle on the Anthropological Difference and Animals Minds,” in Keil, G. and Kreft, N. (eds.), Aristotle’s Anthropology (Cambridge University Press), 140–160.Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, P. 2001. “Organism, Environment, and Dialectics,” in Singh, R., Krimbas, C., Paul, D., and Beatty, J. (eds.), Thinking About Evolution: Historical, Philosophical and Political Perspectives (Cambridge University Press), 253–266.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, R. 1940. The Material Basis of Evolution (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Golitsis, P. 2016. “John Philoponus. Commentary on the Third Book of Aristotle’s De Anima,” in Sorabji, R. (ed.), Aristotle Re-interpreted: New Findings on Seven Hundred Years of the Ancient Commentators (London: Bloomsbury), 393–412.Google Scholar
Gotthelf, A. 1976–1977. “Aristotle’s Conception of Final Causality,” Review of Metaphysics 30: 226–254. Reprinted 1987, with additional notes and a postscript, in Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology (Cambridge University Press), 204–242 and in A. Gotthelf, 2012a, 3–44.Google Scholar
Gotthelf, A. (ed.) 1985a. Aristotle on Nature and Living Things: Philosophical and Historical Studies Presented to David M. Balme on his Seventieth Birthday (Pittsburgh, PA: Mathesis Publications).Google Scholar
Gotthelf, A. 1985b. “Notes Towards a Study of Substance and Essence in Aristotle’s Parts of Animals II–IV,” in Gotthelf, A. (ed.), Aristotle on Nature and Living Things: Philosophical and Historical Studies Presented to David M. Balme on his Seventieth Birthday (Pittsburgh, PA: Mathesis Publications) 27–54. Reprinted in A. Gotthelf, 2012a, 217–240.Google Scholar
Gotthelf, A. 1987. “First Principles in Aristotle’s Parts of Animals,” in Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology (Cambridge University Press), 167–198 and in A. Gotthelf, 2012a, 153–185.Google Scholar
Gotthelf, A. 1988. “The Place of the Good in Aristotle’s Teleology,” in J. J. Cleary and D. C. Shartin (eds.), Proceedings of the Boston Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 4: 113–139. Reprinted in A. Gotthelf, 2012a, 45–66.Google Scholar
Gotthelf, A. 1989. “Teleology and Spontaneous Generation in Aristotle: A Discussion,” in Penner, T. and Kraut, R. (eds.), Nature, Knowledge and Virtue. Apeiron: Special Issue 22.4 (Kelowna: Academic Publishing and Printing), 181–193. Reprinted in A. Gotthelf, 2012a, 142–150.Google Scholar
Gotthelf, A. 1997a. “The Elephant’s Nose: Further Reflections on the Axiomatic Structure of Biological Explanations in Aristotle,” in Kullmann, W. and Föllinger, S. (eds.), Aristotelische Biologie (Stuttgart: Steiner), 215–230. Reprinted in A. Gotthelf, 2012a, 186–196.Google Scholar
Gotthelf, A. 1997b. “Understanding Aristotle’s Teleology,” in Hassing, R. (ed.), Final Causality in Nature and Human Affairs (Washington, DC: Catholic University Press), 71–82. Revised and reprinted in A. Gotthelf, 2012a, 67–89.Google Scholar
Gotthelf, A. 1999. “Darwin on Aristotle,” Journal of the History of Biology 32: 3–30. Reprinted in Gotthelf 2012a, 345–370.Google Scholar
Gotthelf, A. 2012a. Teleology, First Principles, and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s Biology (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Gotthelf, A. 2012b. “Teleology and Embryogenesis in Aristotle’s GA II 6,” in Gotthelf, A., Teleology, First Principles, and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s Biology (Oxford University Press), 261–292.Google Scholar
Gotthelf, A. 2012c. “Division and Explanation in Aristotle’s Parts of Animals,” in Gotthelf, A., Teleology, First Principles, and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s Biology (Oxford University Press), 197–216.Google Scholar
Gotthelf, A. 2012d. “Data-Organisation, Classification, and Kinds: The Place of the History of Animals in Aristotle’s Biological Enterprise,” in Gotthelf, A., Teleology, First Principles, and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s Biology (Oxford University Press), 261–288.Google Scholar
Gotthelf, A. 2012e. “History of Animals I.6 490b7–491a6: Aristotle’s Megista Gênê,” in Gotthelf, A., Teleology, First Principles, and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s Biology (Oxford University Press), 293–306.Google Scholar
Gotthelf, A. 2012f. “Historiae I: Plantarum et Animalium,” in Gotthelf, A., Teleology, First Principles and Scientific Method (Oxford University Press), 307–342. [Reprinted from Fortenbaugh, W. W. and Sharples, R. W. (eds.) 1988. Theophrastean Studies: On Natural Science, Physics and Metaphysics, Ethics, Religion and Rhetoric (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books), 100–135.]Google Scholar
Gotthelf, A. 2012g. “CODA: Aristotle as Scientist: A Proper Verdict (with Emphasis on his Biological Works),” in Gotthelf, A., Teleology, First Principles, and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s Biology (Oxford University Press), 371–398.Google Scholar
Gotthelf, A. and Falcon, A. 2018. “‘One Long Argument’? The Unity of Aristotle’s Generation of Animals,” in Falcon, A. and Lefebvre, D. (eds.), Aristotle’s Generation of Animals: A Critical Guide (Cambridge University Press), 15–34.Google Scholar
Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. (eds.) 1987. Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Gotthelf, A. and Leunissen, M. 2010. “What’s Teleology Got to Do with It? A Reinterpretation of Aristotle’s Generation of Animals,” Phronesis 55: 325–356. Reprinted in A. Gotthelf, 2012a, 117–141.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, P. and Sober, E. 2017. “Aristotle on ‘Nature Does Nothing in Vain’,” Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 7(2): 246–271.Google Scholar
Graham, D. W. 2010. The Texts of Early Greek Philosophy. The Complete Fragments and Selected Testimonies of the Major Presocratics, 2 vols. (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Granger, H. 1985. “The Scala Naturae and the Continuity of Kinds,” Phronesis 30: 181–200.Google Scholar
Granger, H. 1987. “Aristotle and the Finitude of Natural Kinds,” Philosophy 62: 523–526.Google Scholar
Gray, A. 1860. “Darwin and his Reviewers,” Atlantic Monthly, October 6, 406–425, http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/searchresults?freetext=gray%20atlantic%20monthly.Google Scholar
Gregorić, P. 2007. Aristotle on the Common Sense (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Gregorić, P. and Filip, G. 2006. “Aristotle’s Notion of Experience,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 88(1): 1–30.Google Scholar
Gregory, A. 2016. Anaximander: A Re-Assessment (London: Bloomsbury).Google Scholar
Grene, M. 1963. Portrait of Aristotle (London: Faber and Faber).Google Scholar
Grene, M. 1974. The Understanding of Nature (Boston, MA: Kluwer).Google Scholar
Grene, M. 1989. “Defense of David Kitts,” Biology and Philosophy 4: 69–72.Google Scholar
Grene, M. and Depew, D. 2004. Philosophy of Biology: An Episodic History (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Griffiths, P. E. 1993. “Functional Analysis and Proper Functions,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44: 409–422.Google Scholar
Hadot, I. 1991. “The Role of the Commentaries on Aristotle in the Teaching of Philosophy According to the Prefaces to the Neoplatonic Commentaries on Aristotle,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy. Supplementary Volume: Aristotle and the Later Tradition: 175–189.Google Scholar
Hadot, I. 2002. “Simplicius or Priscianus? On the Author of the Commentary on Aristotle’s De Anima: A Methodological Study,” Mnemosyne 55: 159–199.Google Scholar
Hadot, I. 2015. The Harmonization of Aristotle and Plato at Alexandria and Athens (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar
Hall, T. S. 1965. “The Biology of the Timaeus in Historical Perspective,” Arion 4: 109–122.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. 2001. Cause and Explanation in Ancient Greek Thought (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. 2016. “Galen on Aristotle,” in Falcon, A. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Aristotle in Antiquity (Leiden: Brill), 238–257.Google Scholar
Harriman, B. 2018. Melissus and Eleatic Monism (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Hasper, P.-S. 2006. “Sources of Delusion,” Phronesis 51(3): 252–284.Google Scholar
Hatzimichali, M. 2013. “Encyclopaedism in the Alexandrian Library,” in König, J. and Woolf, G. (eds.), Encyclopaedism from Antiquity to the Renaissance (Cambridge University Press), 64–83.Google Scholar
Heath, M. 2008. “Aristotle on Natural Slavery,” Phronesis 53(3): 243–270.Google Scholar
Hellmann, O. 2006. “Peripatetic Biology and the Epitome of Aristophanes of Byzantium,” in Fortenbaugh, W. W. and White, S. A. (eds.), Aristo of Ceos. Text, Translation and Discussion (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books), 329–359.Google Scholar
Hellmann, O. 2015. “On the Interface of Philology and Science: The Case of Zoology,” in Montanari, F., Matthaios, S., and Rengakos, A. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Ancient Greek Scholarship (Leiden: Brill), 1236–1266.Google Scholar
Helmreich, G. (ed.) 1907–1909. Galeni De Usu Partium, 2 vols. (Leipzig: Teubner).Google Scholar
Henry, D. 2005. “Embryological Models in Ancient Philosophy,” Phronesis 50: 1–42.Google Scholar
Henry, D. 2006a. “Understanding Aristotle’s Reproductive Hylomorphism,” Apeiron 39: 257–288.Google Scholar
Henry, D. 2006b. “Aristotle on the Mechanisms of Inheritance,” Journal of the History of Biology 39: 425–455.Google Scholar
Henry, D. 2007. “How Sexist is Aristotle’s Developmental Biology?” Phronesis 52: 251–269.Google Scholar
Henry, D. 2009. “Aristotle’s Generation of Animals,” in Agnostonopolous, G. (ed.), A Companion to Aristotle (Oxford: Blackwell), 368–383.Google Scholar
Henry, D. 2011a. “A Sharp Eye for Kinds: Collection and Division in Plato’s Late Dialogues,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 51: 229–255.Google Scholar
Henry, D. 2011b. “Aristotle’s Pluralistic Realism,” The Monist 94: 197–220.Google Scholar
Henry, D. 2013. “Optimality Reasoning in Aristotle’s Natural Teleology,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 55: 225–263.Google Scholar
Henry, D. 2015. “Aristotle on the Cosmological Significance of Animal Generation,” in Ebrey, D. (ed.), Theory and Practice in Aristotle’s Natural Science (Cambridge University Press), 100–118.Google Scholar
Henry, D. 2018a. “Aristotle on Animals,” in Adamson, P. and Edwards, F. (eds.), Animals. A History (Oxford University Press), 9–25.Google Scholar
Henry, D. 2018b. “Aristotle on Epigenesis: Two Senses of Epigenesis,” in A. Falcon and D. Lefebvre (eds.) Aristotle’s Generation of Animals: A Critical Guide (Cambridge University Press), 89–107.Google Scholar
Henry, D. 2019. Matter, Form and Moving Causes: Aristotle’s Hylomorphic Theory of Substantial Generation (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Henry, D. and Nielsen, K. M. (eds.) 2015. Bridging the Gap Between Aristotle’s Science and Ethics (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Herman, J. J., Sultan, S., Horgan-Kybelski, T., and Riggs, C. 2016. “Adaptive Transgenerational Plasticity in an Annual Plant: Grandparental and Parental Drought Stress Enhance Performance of Seedlings in Dry Soil,” Integrative and Comparative Biology 52: 77–88.Google Scholar
Hladký, V. 2017. “Empedocles’ Sphairos,” Rhizomata 5: 1–24.Google Scholar
Hodge, M. J. S. 1982. “Darwin and the Laws of the Animate Part of the Terrestrial System: On the Lyellian Origin of his Zoonomical Explanatory Program,” Studies in the History of Biology 6: 1–106.Google Scholar
Huby, P. M. 1985. “Theophrastus in the Aristotelian Corpus,” in Gotthelf, A. (ed.), Aristotle on Nature and Living Things: Philosophical Studies Presented to David M. Balme (Pittsburgh, PA: Mathesis Publications), 313–325.Google Scholar
Hull, D. 1965. “The Effects of Essentialism on Taxonomy: Two Thousand Years of Stasis,” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 15: 314–326.Google Scholar
Hull, D. 1969. “What the Philosophy of Biology Is Not,” Synthese 20: 157–184.Google Scholar
Hull, D. 1976. “Are Species Really Individuals?” Systematic Zoology 25: 174–191.Google Scholar
Hulskamp, M. A. A. 2008. “Sleep and Dreams in Ancient Medical Diagnosis and Prognosis.” PhD Thesis, Newcastle University, https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.489328.Google Scholar
Humphrey, N. 1976. “The Social Function of the Intellect,” in Bateson, P. P. G. and Hinde, R. A. (eds.), Growing Points in Ethology (Cambridge University Press), 303–317.Google Scholar
Huneman, P. and Walsh, D. M. (eds.) 2017. Challenging the Modern Synthesis: Adaptation, Development, Inheritance (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Hutchinson, D. 1988. “Doctrines of the Mean and the Debate Concerning Skills in Fourth-Century Medicine, Rhetoric and Ethics,” Apeiron 21: 17–52.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, D. S. and Johnson, M. R. 2017. Protrepticus or Exhortation to Philosophy (citations, fragments, paraphrases, and other evidence), www.protrepticus.info/protr2017x20.pdf.Google Scholar
Huxley, T. H. 1887. “On the Reception of the ‘Origin of Species’,” in Darwin, F. (ed.), Life and Letters of Charles Darwin, Vol. 1 (New York: Appleton), 533–558.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. 1980. “The Metaphysical and Psychological Basis of Aristotle’s Ethics,” in Rorty, A. O. (ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s Ethics (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press), 35–53.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. 1985/1999. Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett).Google Scholar
Irwin, T. 1995. Irwin, T. (ed.), Classical Philosophy. Collected Papers (Abingdon: Routledge), 27–80.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. 2012. “Conceptions of Happiness in the Nicomachean Ethics,” in Shields, C. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Aristotle (Oxford University Press), 495–523.Google Scholar
Jaeger, W. 1957. “Aristotle’s Use of Medicine as Model of Method in His Ethics,” Journal for Hellenic Studies 77: 54–61.Google Scholar
Janko, R. 1992. “From Catharsis to the Aristotelian Mean,” in Rorty, A. O. (ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s Poetics (Princeton University Press), 341–358.Google Scholar
Johansen, T. K. 1996. “Aristotle on the Sense of Smell,” Phronesis, 41(1): 1–19.Google Scholar
Johansen, T. K. 2004. Plato’s Natural Philosophy: A Study of the Timaeus–Critias (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Johansen, T. K. 2012. The Powers of Aristotle’s Soul (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Johnson, M. R. 2005. Aristotle on Teleology (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Johnson, M. R. 2012. “The Medical Background of Aristotle’s Theory of Nature and Spontaneity,” Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 27: 105–152.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. R. 2013. “Spontaneity, Nature, and Voluntary Action in Lucretius,” in Lehoux, D., Morrison, A. C., and Sharrock, A. (eds.), Lucretius: Poetry, Philosophy, and Science (Oxford University Press), 99–130.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. R. 2015. “Aristotle’s Architectonic Science,” in Ebrey, D. (ed.), Theory and Practice in Aristotle’s Natural Philosophy (Cambridge University Press), 163–186.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. R. 2018. “Aristotle on the Meaning of Life,” in Leach, S. and Tartagalia, J. (eds.), The Meaning of Life and the Great Philosophers (Abingdon: Routledge), 56–64.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. R. 2019. “Aristotle on Cosmos and Cosmoi,” in Horky, P (ed.), Cosmos in the Ancient World (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Joly, R. 1978. Hippocrate: Des Lieux dans l’Homme. Du Systeme des Glandes. Des Fistules. Des Hemorroides. De la Vision. Des Chairs. De la Dentition (Paris: Les Belles Lettres).Google Scholar
Joly, R. and Byl, S. 2003. Hippocrate: Du Régime, CMG 1.2.4. (Berlin: Akademie Verlag).Google Scholar
Jouanna, J. 1966. “La theorie de l’intelligence et de l’âme dans le traité hippocratique Du régime; ses rapports ave Empèdocle et le Timée de Platon,” Revue Des Etudes Grecques 79: 15–18.Google Scholar
Jouanna, J. 1980. “Médecine et politique dans la Politique d’Aristote (ii 1268b25–1269a28),” Ktèma 5: 257–266.Google Scholar
Jouanna, J. 1996. “Hippocrate et les Problemata d’Aristote: Essai de comparaison entre Airs, Eaux, Lieux,” in Wittern, R. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.), Hippokratische Medizin und Antike Philosophie (Hildesheim: Olms), 273–293.Google Scholar
Jouanna, J. 1999. Hippocrates. Translated by M. B. Debevoise (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar
Joubaud, C. 1991. Le corps humain dans la philosophie platonicienne. Étude à partir du Timée (Paris: Vrin).Google Scholar
Journée, G. 2012. “Lumière et Nuit, Féminin et Masculin chez Parménide d’Elée: Quelques Remarques,” Phronesis 57: 289–318.Google Scholar
Judson, L. 2005. “Aristotelian Teleology,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 29: 341–365.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 1960. Anaximander and the Origins of Greek Cosmology (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
Kalderon, M. E. 2015. Form Without Matter: Aristotle and Empedocles on Colour Perception (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Karbowski, J. 2019. “Political Animals and Human Nature in Aristotle’s Politics,” in Keil, G. and Kreft, N. (eds.), Aristotle’s Anthropology (Cambridge University Press), 221–237.Google Scholar
Katayama, E. G. 1999. Aristotle on Artifacts (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press).Google Scholar
Kay, L. 2000. Who Wrote the Book of Life? (Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
Keller, E. F. 2000. The Century of the Gene (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Keller, E. F. 2014. “From Gene Action to Reactive Genomes,” Journal of Physiology 592(11): 2423–2429.Google Scholar
Kelsey, S. 2011. “Physics 199a8–12,” Apeiron 44: 1–12.Google Scholar
Kember, O. 1971. “Right and Left in the Sexual Theories of Parmenides,” Journal of Hellenic Studies 91: 70–79.Google Scholar
Kember, O. 1973. “Anaxagoras’ Theory of Sexual Difference and Heredity,” Phronesis 18: 1–14.Google Scholar
Kevles, D. and Hood, L. (eds.) 1992. The Code of Codes: Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1999. “Making Sense of Emergence,” Philosophical Studies 95: 3–36.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 2006. “Emergence: Core Ideas and Issues,” Synthese 151: 547–559.Google Scholar
King, R. A. H. 2001. Aristotle on Life and Death (London: Duckworth).Google Scholar
King, R. A. H 2010. “The Concept of Life and the Life-Cycle in De Iuventute,” in Föllinger, S. (ed.), Was ist ‘Leben’? Aristoteles’ Anschauungen zur Entstehung und Funktionsweise von Leben (Stuttgart: Steiner).Google Scholar
King, R. A. H 2016. “Aristotle and the Six-Pack: All Flesh and No Muscle?” in Buchheim, T. and Meissner, D. (eds.), Soma. Körperkonzepte und körperliche Existenz in der Antiken Philosophie und Literatur (Hamburg: Felix Meiner).Google Scholar
King, R. A. H 2021. “Trophê and Hylomorphism. Reading De Anima II 1,” in Lo Presti, R. and Korobili, G. (eds.), Nutrition and Nutritive Soul in Aristotle and Aristotelianism (Berlin: De Gruyter), 43–62.Google Scholar
Kitts, D. B. 1987. “Plato on Kinds of Animals,” Biology and Philosophy 2: 315–328.Google Scholar
Klosin, A., Casas, E., Hidalgo-Carcedo, C., Vavouri, T., and Lehner, B. 2017. “Transgenerational Transmission of Environmental Information in C. elegans,” Science 356(6335): 320–323.Google Scholar
Kočandrle, R. and Couprie, D. L. 2017. Apeiron: Anaximander on Generation and Destruction (Cham: Springer).Google Scholar
Kollesch, J. 1997. “Die Anatomischen Untersuchungen des Aristoteles und ihr Stellenwert als Forschungsmethode in der Aristotelischen Biologie,” in Kullmann, W. and Föllinger, S. (eds.), Aristotelische Biologie (Stuttgart: Steiner), 367–373.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, C. 1986. “Aristotle on Function and Virtue,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 3(3): 259–279.Google Scholar
Kosman, A. 1987. “Animals and Other Beings in Aristotle,” in Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology (Cambridge University Press), 360–391.Google Scholar
Kosman, A. 2010. “Male and Female in Aristotle’s Generation of Animals,” in Lennox, J. G. and Bolton, R. (eds.), Being, Nature, and Life in Aristotle (Cambridge University Press), 147–167.Google Scholar
Kosman, A. 2013. The Activity of Being. An Essay on Aristotle’s Ontology (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Kraut, R. 1997. Aristotle Politics Books 7 and 8. Translation and commentary (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Kraut, R. 2018. “Aristotle’s Ethics,” in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/aristotle-ethics.Google Scholar
Kucharski, P. 1964. “Anaxagoras et les Idées Biologiques de son Siècle,” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Étranger 154: 137–166.Google Scholar
Kudlien, F. 1962. “Poseidonius und die Ärzteschule der Pneumatiker,” Hermes 90: 419–429.Google Scholar
Kühlewein, H. 1884. “Beiträge zur Geschichte und Beurteilung der Hippokratischen Schriften,” Philologus 42: 119–133.Google Scholar
Kullmann, W. 1974. Wissenschaft und Methode: Interpretationen zur Aristotelischen Theorie der Naturwissenschaft (Berlin: De Gruyter).Google Scholar
Kullmann, W. 1991. “Man as a Political Animal in Aristotle,” in Keyt, D. and Miller, F. (eds.), A Companion to Aristotle’s Politics (Oxford University Press), 94–117.Google Scholar
Kullmann, W. 1998a. Aristoteles und die Moderne Wissenschaft (Stuttgart: Steiner).Google Scholar
Kullmann, W. 1998b. “Zoologische Sammelwerke in der Antike,” in Kullmann, W., Althoff, J. and Asper, M. (eds.), Gattungen Wissenschaftlicher Literatur in der Antike (Tübingen: Narr), 121–140.Google Scholar
Kullmann, W. 1999. “Zoologische Sammelwerke in der Antike,” in Wöhrle, G. (ed.), Geschichte der Mathematik und der Naturwissenschaften i. (Stuttgart: Steiner), 181–198.Google Scholar
Kullmann, W. 2007. Aristoteles: Zoologische Schriften II. Über die Teile der Lebewesen (Berlin: Akademie Verlag).Google Scholar
Kullmann, W. and Föllinger, S. (eds.) 1997. Aristotelische Biologie: Intentionem, Methoden, Ergebnisse (Stuttgart: Steiner).Google Scholar
Kupreeva, I. 2005. “Aristotle on Growth: A Study of the Argument of On Generation and Corruption 1.5,” Apeiron 38(3): 103–159.Google Scholar
Labarrière, J. L. 1990. “De la Phronesis Animale,” in Devereux, D. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.), Biologie, Logique et Metaphysique chez Aristote (Paris: l’Editions de Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), 405–428.Google Scholar
Laks, A. 2018. The Concept of Presocratic Philosophy: Its Origin, Development, and Significance, trans. G. W. Most (Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Laks, A. and Most, G. (eds.) 2016. Early Greek Philosophy, 9 vols. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Laland, K., Uller, T., Feldman, M., Sterelny, L., Müller, G. B., Moczek, A., Jablonka, E., and Odling-Smee, J. 2011. “Cause and Effect in Biology Revisited: Is Mayr’s Proximate-Ultimate Dichotomy Still Useful?” Science 334(6062): 1512–1516.Google Scholar
Laland, K., Uller, T., Feldman, M., Sterelny, L., Müller, G. B., Moczek, A., Jablonka, E., and Odling-Smee, J. 2014. “Does Evolutionary Theory Need a Rethink? Yes. Urgently,” Nature 514: 161–164.Google Scholar
Laland, K., Uller, T., Feldman, M., Sterelny, L., Müller, G. B., Moczek, A., Jablonka, E., and Odling-Smee, J. 2015. “The Extended Evolutionary Synthesis: Its Structure, Assumptions and Predictions,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 282(1813): 20151019.Google Scholar
Lambros, S. 1885. Excerptorum Constantini de natura animalium libri duo. Aristophanis Historiae animalium epitome subiunctis Aeliani Timothei aliorumque eclogis (Berlin: Reimer).Google Scholar
Lange, L. 1983. “Woman Is Not a Rational Animal: On Aristotle’s Biology of Reproduction,” in Harding, S. and Hintikka, M. (eds.), Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and the Philosophy of Science (Dordrecht: Reidel), 1–16.Google Scholar
Laqueur, T. 1990. Making Sex: Body and Gender from the Greeks to Freud (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Le Blay, F. 2005. “Microcosm and Macrocosm: The Dual Direction of Analogy in Hippocratic Thought and the Meteorological Tradition,” in van der Eijk, P. (ed.), Hippocrates in Context: Papers Read at the Sixth International Hippocrates Colloquium (Leiden: Brill), 251–269.Google Scholar
Lee, H. D. P. 1952. Aristote Meteorologica (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Lefebvre, D. 2014. Aristote, La Génération des Animaux, in Pellegrin, P. (ed.), Aristote, Œuvres Complètes (Paris: Flammarion), 1576–1730.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, D. 2016. “Le sperma: Forme, matière ou les deux? Aristote critique de la double semence,” Philosophie Antique 16: 31–62.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, D. 2018. “Parts and Generation. The Prologue to the Generation of Animals and the Structure of the Treatise,” in Falcon, A. and Lefebvre, D. (eds.), Aristotle’s Generation of Animals: A Critical Guide (Cambridge University Press), 35–55.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, D. Forthcoming. “Reproductive Residues as Quantities and Powers: Aristotle on the Nature of the Seed,” in Föllinger, S. (ed), Aristotle’s Generation of Animals: A Comprehensive Approach.Google Scholar
Leitao, D. 2012. The Pregnant Male as Myth and Metaphor in Classical Greek Literature (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 1982. “Teleology, Chance, and Aristotle’s Theory of Spontaneous Generation,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 20: 219–232. Reprinted in J. G. Lennox, 2001b, 229–249.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 1985. “Plato’s Unnatural Teleology,” in O’Meara, D. (ed.), Platonic Investigations (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press), 195–218.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 1987a. “Divide and Explain: The Posterior Analytics in Practice,” in Gotthelf, A and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology (Cambridge University Press), 90–119. Reprinted in J. G. Lennox, 2001b, 7–38.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 1987b. “Kinds, Forms of Kinds, and the More and the Less in Aristotle’s Biology,” in Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology (Cambridge University Press), 339–359. Reprinted in J. G. Lennox, 2001b, 160–181.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 1990. “Notes on David Charles on HA,” in Devereux, D. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.), Biologie, Logique et Métaphysique chez Aristote (Paris: Éditions du CNRS), 169–183.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 1991. “Between Data and Demonstration: The Analytics and the Historia Animalium,” in Bowen, A. (ed.), Science and Philosophy in Classical Greece (New York: Garland Publishing), 261–295.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 1994a. “Darwin Was a Teleologist,” Biology and Philosophy 8: 409–421.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 1994b. “Teleology by Another Name: A Reply to Ghiselin,” Biology and Philosophy 9: 493–495.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 1995. “Material and Formal Natures in Aristotle’s De Partibus Animalium,” in Cleary, John J. and Wians, W. (eds.), Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy, Volume XI (Lanham MD: University Press of America), 217–240. Reprinted in W. Kullmann and S. Föllinger (eds.) 1997, 163–181 and in Lennox, 2001b, 182–204.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 1997a. “Nature Does Nothing in Vain …, ” in Kullman, W., Günther, H.-C., and Rengakos, A. (eds.), Beiträge zur Antiken Philosophie. Festschrift für Wolfgang Kullmann, herausgegeben von Hans-Christian Günther und Antonios Rengakos (mit einer Einleitung von Ernst Vogt) (Stuttgart: Steiner), 199–214. Reprinted in J. G. Lennox, 2001b, 205–223.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 1997b. “Material and Formal Natures in Aristotle’s De Partibus Animalium,” in Kullmann, W. and Föllinger, S. (eds.), Aristotelische Biologie (Stuttgart: Steiner), 161–181.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 1999a. “Aristotle on the Biological Roots of Virtue: The Natural History of Natural Virtue,” in Maienschein, J. and Ruse, M. (eds.), Biology and the Foundation of Ethics (Cambridge University Press), 10–31. Reprinted in D. Henry and K. M. Nielsen (eds.) 2015, 193–213.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 1999b. “The Place of Mankind in Aristotle’s Zoology,” Philosophical Topics 27: 1–16.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 2001a. Aristotle. On the Parts of Animals 1–4. Translated with an Introduction and Commentary (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 2001b. Aristotle’s Philosophy of Biology: Studies in the Origins of Life Science (Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Biology) (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 2001c. “Material and Formal Natures in Aristotle’s De Partibus Animalium,” in Lennox, J. G., Aristotle’s Philosophy of Biology (Cambridge University Press), 182–204.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 2001d. “Matter, Form and Kind,” in Lennox, J. G., Aristotle’s Philosophy of Biology (Cambridge University Press), 127–130.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 2001e. “Are Aristotelian Kinds Eternal?” in Lennox, J. G., Aristotle’s Philosophy of Biology (Cambridge University Press), 160–181.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 2001f. “The Disappearance of Aristotle’s Biology: A Hellenistic Mystery,” in Lennox, J. G., Aristotle’s Philosophy of Biology (Cambridge University Press), 110–125.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 2004. “Getting a Science Going: Aristotle on Entry Level Kinds,” in Wolters, G. (ed.), Homo Sapiens und Homo Faber (Festschrift Mittelstrass) (Berlin: De Gruyter), 87–100.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 2005. “The Place of Zoology in Aristotle’s Natural Philosophy,” in Sharples, R. W. (ed.), Philosophy and the Sciences in Antiquity (Aldershot, UK: Ashgate).Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 2006. “Aristotle’s Biology and Aristotle’s Philosophy,” in Gill, M. L. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.), A Companion to Ancient Philosophy (Oxford: Blackwell), 292–315.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 2009a. “Form, Essence, and Explanation in Aristotle’s Biology,” in Anagnostopoulos, G. (ed.), A Companion to Aristotle (London: Blackwell), 348–367.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 2009b. “De Caelo 2.2 and its Debt to the de Incessu Animalium,” in Bowen, A. C. and Wildberg, C. (eds.), New Perspectives on Aristotle’s De Caelo (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 2009c. “Aristotle on Mind and the Science of Nature,” in Rossetto, M., Tsianikas, M., Couvalis, G., and Palaktsoglou, M. (eds.), Greek Research in Australia: Proceedings of the Biennial International Conference of Greek Studies, June 2009 (Adelaide: Flinders University Department of Languages), 1–18.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 2010a. “Bios and Explanatory Unity in Aristotle’s Biology,” in Charles, D. (ed.), Definition in Greek Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 329–355.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 2010b. “Βιος, Πραχεις, and the Unity of Life,” in Föllinger, S. (ed.), Aristoteles: Was ist ‘Leben’? Aristoteles’ Anschauungen zur Entstehungsweise und Funktion von Leben. Akten der Tagung vom 23.-26. August 2006 in Bamberg (Stuttgart: F. Steiner), 239–259.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 2011. “Aristotle on Norms of Inquiry,” HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 1: 23–46.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 2012. “The Complexity of Aristotle’s Study of Animals,” in Shields, C. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Aristotle (Oxford University Press), 287–305.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 2014. “Aristotle on the Emergence of Material Complexity: Meteorology IV and Aristotle’s Biology,” HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 4: 272–305.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 2017a. “Aristotle’s Biology,” in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2017 Edition), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/aristotle-biology.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 2017b. “An Aristotelian Philosophy of Biology: Form, Function and Development,” Acta Philosophica 26: 33–52.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 2018a. “‘For a Human Being Reproduces a Human Being’: A Mundane, Profound, Aristotelian Truth,” in Sfendoni-Mentzou, D. (ed.), Aristotle – Contemporary Perspectives on His Thought: On the 2400th Anniversary of Aristotle’s Birth (Berlin: De Gruyter).Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 2018b. “Aristotle, Dissection, and Generation: Experience, Expertise, and the Practices of Knowing,” in Falcon, A. and Lefebvre, D. (eds.), Aristotle’s Generation of Animals: A Critical Guide (Cambridge University Press), 249–272.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 2021. “‘Most Natural Among the Functions of Living Things’: Puzzles about Reproduction as a Nutritive Function,” in Lo Presti, R. and Korobili, G. (eds.), Nutrition and Nutritive Soul in Aristotle and Aristotelianism (Berlin: De Gruyter), 3–19.Google Scholar
Leroi, A. M. 2014. The Lagoon: How Aristotle Invented Science (London: Bloomsbury).Google Scholar
Lesky, E. 1951. Die Zeugungs- und Vererbungslehren der Antike und ihr Nachwirken (Mainz: Verlag der Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur).Google Scholar
Leunissen, M. 2010. Explanation and Teleology in Aristotle’s Science of Nature (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Leunissen, M. 2012. “Aristotle on Natural Character and Its Implications for Moral Development,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 50(4): 507–530.Google Scholar
Leunissen, M. (ed.) 2015a. Aristotle’s Physics: A Critical Guide (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Leunissen, M. 2015b. “Aristotle on Knowing Natural Science for the Sake of Living Well,” in Henry, D. and Nielsen, K. M. (eds.), Bridging the Gap Between Aristotle’s Science and Ethics (Cambridge University Press), 214–231.Google Scholar
Leunissen, M. 2015c. “Perfection and the Physiology of Habituation According to Physics Vii.3,” in Leunissen, M. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics: A Critical Guide (Cambridge University Press), 225–245.Google Scholar
Leunissen, M. 2017. From Natural Character to Moral Virtue in Aristotle (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Lewens, T. 2015. Cultural Evolution (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. 1978. “Adaptation,” Scientific American 239: 212–230.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. 2003. The Triple Helix: Genes, Organism and Environments (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Li Causi, P. 2017. “Un Aristotele romano? Ricezione e metamorfosi del corpus zoologico in Plinio il Vecchio,” in Sassi, M. M., Coda, E., and Feola, G. (eds.), La zoologia di Aristotele e la sua ricezione dall’età ellenistica e romana alle culture medievali (Pisa University Press), 81–106.Google Scholar
Littré, E. 1839. Oeuvres complètes d’Hippocrate, Vol. 1 (Paris: J. B. Baillière).Google Scholar
Littré, E. 1853. Oeuvres Complètes d’Hippocrate, Vol. 8 (Paris: J. B. Baillière).Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1963. “Who Is Attacked in ‘On Ancient Medicine’?” Phronesis 8: 108–126.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1966. Polarity and Analogy: Two Types of Argument in Early Greek Thought (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1968. “The Role of Medical and Biological Analogies in Aristotle’s Ethics,” Phronesis 13: 68–83.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1970. Early Greek Science: Thales to Aristotle (New York: W. W. Norton and Company).Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1975. “Alcmaeon and the Early History of Dissection,” Sudhoffs Archiv 59(2): 113–147.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1979. Magic, Reason and Experience: Studies in the Origin and Development of Greek Science (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1983a. Science, Folklore, and Ideology: Studies in the Life Sciences in Ancient Greece (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1983b. “Aristotle on the Difference Between the Sexes,” in Lloyd, G. E. R., Science, Folklore and Ideology: Studies in the Life Sciences in Ancient Greece (Cambridge University Press), 94–105.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1987. “Empirical Research in Aristotle’s Biology,” in Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology (Cambridge University Press), 53–64.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1990. “Aristotle’s Zoology and His Metaphysics. The Status Quaestionis. A Critical Review of Some Recent Theories,” in Devereux, D. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.), Biologie, Logique et Métaphysique chez Aristote (Paris: Éditions du CNRS), 7–36.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1996a. Aristotelian Explorations (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1996b. “The Master Cook,” in Lloyd, G. E. R., Aristotelian Explorations (Cambridge University Press), 83–103.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 2013. “Aristotle on Natural Sociability, Skills and Intelligence in Animals,” in Harte, V. and Lane, M. (eds.), Politeia in Greek and Roman Philosophy (Cambridge University Press), 277–293.Google Scholar
Loenen, J. H. 1954. “Was Anaximander an Evolutionist?” Mnemosyne, 4th series 7: 215–232.Google Scholar
Lones, T. E. 1912. Aristotle’s Researches in Natural Science (London: West, Newman & Co.).Google Scholar
Long, A. A. and Sedley, D. N. 1987. The Hellenistic Philosophers, Vol. 2 (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Longrigg, J. 1995. “Medicine in the Lyceum,” in van der Eijk, P., Horstmanshoff, H. F. J., and Schrijvers, P. H. (eds.), Ancient Medicine in its Socio-Cultural Context (Amsterdam: Rodopi Press), 431–445.Google Scholar
Lo Presti, R. and Korobili, G. 2021. Nutrition and Nutritive Soul in Aristotle and Aristotelianism (Berlin: De Gruyter).Google Scholar
Lorenz, H. 2006. The Brute Within: Appetitive Desire in Plato and Aristotle (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Louguet, C. 2015. “Aristote et les théories pangénétiques du Ve siècle: Enjeux métaphysiques d’un débat biologique,” in Gysembergh, V. and Schwab, A. (eds.), Le travail du savoir. Wissensbewältigung: Philosophie, sciences exactes et sciences appliquées dans l’antiquité (Trier: Wvt Wissenschaftlicher Verlag), 119–161.Google Scholar
Louguet, C. Forthcoming. “Aristotle and the Hippocratic Corpus on Generation,” in Lefebvre, D. (ed.), The Science of Life in Aristotle and the Early Peripatos (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar
Macfarlane, P. 2020. “The Pathological Role of Pneuma in Aristotle,” in Bartoš, H. and King, C. G. (eds.), Heat, Pneuma, and Soul in Ancient Philosophy and Medicine (Cambridge University Press), 310–330.Google Scholar
Makin, S. 2006. Aristotle: Metaphysics Theta. Translated with a commentary (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Manetti, D. 2011a. “Aristotle and the Role of Doxography in the Anonymus Londiniensis (PBrLibr Inv. 137),” in van der Eijk, P. (ed.), Ancient Histories of Medicine (Leiden: Brill), 95–142.Google Scholar
Manetti, D. 2011b. Anonymus Londiniensis, De medicina (Berlin: De Gruyter).Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. 2016. Melissus Between Miletus and Elea (Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag).Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. 2018. “Parmenides From Right to Left,” in Mansfeld, J., Studies in Early Greek Philosophy: A Collection of Papers and One Review (Leiden: Brill), 185–202.Google Scholar
Marc Cohen, S. 1973. “Plato’s Method of Division,” in Moravcsik, J. M. E. (ed.), Patterns in Plato’s Thought (Dordrecht: Reidel), 181–191.Google Scholar
Marmodoro, A. 2013. “Aristotle’s Hylomorphism Without Reconditioning,” Philosophical Inquiry 37(1/2): 5–22.Google Scholar
Marmodoro, A. 2014a. Aristotle on Perceiving Objects (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Marmodoro, A. 2014b. “Causation Without Glue: Aristotle on Causal Powers,” in Natali, C., Viano, C., and Zingano, M. (eds.), Les quatre causes d’Aristotle. Origins et interprétations (Louvain: Peeters), 221–246.Google Scholar
Marmodoro, A. 2017. Everything in Everything: Anaxagoras’ Metaphysics (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Mayhew, R. 2004. The Female in Aristotle’s Biology: Reason and Rationalization (University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Mayr, E. 1942. Systematics and the Origin of Species (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
Mayr, E. 1961. “Cause and Effect in Biology,” Science 134: 1501–1506.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. 1963. Animal Species and Evolution (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Mayr, E. 1982. The Growth of Biological Thought (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Mayr, E. 1988a. Toward a Philosophy of Biology: Observations of an Evolutionist (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Mayr, E. 1988b. “A Response to David Kitts,” Biology and Philosophy 3: 97–98.Google Scholar
McGowan Tress, D. 1992. “The Metaphysical Science of Aristotle’s GA and His Feminist Critics,” Review of Metaphysics 46: 307–341.Google Scholar
McGowan Tress, D. 1999. “Aristotle Against the Hippocratics on Sexual Generation: A reply to Coles,” Phronesis 44: 228–241.Google Scholar
McKirahan, R. 1992. Principles and Proofs: Aristotle’s Theory of Demonstrative Science (Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Medawar, P. B. and Medawar, J. S. 1983. From Aristotle to Zoos: A Philosophical Dictionary of Biology (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Meikle, S. 1994. “Aristotle on Money,” Phronesis 39(1): 26–44.Google Scholar
Meincke, A. S. 2018. “Autopoiesis, Biological Autonomy and the Process View of Life,” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 9(5): 5–27.Google Scholar
Menn, S. 1992. “Aristotle and Plato on God as Nous and as the Good,” Review of Metaphysics 45: 543–573.Google Scholar
Menn, S. 2002. “Aristotle’s Definition of the Soul and the Programme of De Anima,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 30: 83–139.Google Scholar
Menn, S. 2010. “On Socrates’ First Objections to the Physicists (Phaedo 95e8–97b7),” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 38: 37–68.Google Scholar
Menn, S. 2012. “Aristotle’s Theology,” in Shields, C. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Aristotle (Oxford University Press), 422–464.Google Scholar
Merlan, P. 1953. From Platonism to Neoplatonism (The Hague: M. Nijhoff).Google Scholar
Merleau, C. T. 2003. “Bodies, Genders and Causation in Aristotle’s Biological and Political Theory,” Ancient Philosophy 23(1): 135–151.Google Scholar
Midgley, M. 1978. Beast and Man: The Roots of Human Nature (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Mihai, C. I. 2016. “Competing Arts: Medicine and Philosophy in Aristotle’s Protrepticus,” Hermeneia 17: 87–96.Google Scholar
Moczek, A. P. 2012. “The Nature of Nurture and the Future of Evo-Devo: Toward a Theory of Developmental Evolution,” Integrative and Comparative Biology 52: 108–119.Google Scholar
Moczek, A. P., Sultan, S., Foster, S., Ledón-Rettig, C. Dworkin, I., Nijhout, H. F., Abouheif, E., and Pfennig, D. W. 2011. “The Role of Developmental Plasticity in Evolutionary Innovation,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B 278(1719): 2705–2713.Google Scholar
Modrak, D. K. 1987. Aristotle: The Power of Perception (University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Monod, J. 1971. Chance and Necessity: An Essay on the Metaphysics of Life (New York: Schopf and Sons).Google Scholar
Montévil, M. and Mossio, M. 2015. “Biological Organisation as Closure of Constraints,” Journal of Theoretical Biology 372: 179–191.Google Scholar
Morange, M. 2009. Life Explained (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Moraux, P. 1951. Les listes anciennes de ouvrages d’Aristote (Éditions Universitaires de Louvain).Google Scholar
Moraux, P. 1985. “Galen and Aristotle’s De Partibus Animalium,” in Gotthelf, A. (ed.), Aristotle on Nature and Living Things. Philosophical and Historical Studies Presented to David M. Balme (Pittsburgh, PA: Mathesis Publications), 327–344.Google Scholar
Morel, P. M. 1996. Démocrite et la Recherche des Causes (Paris: Klincksieck).Google Scholar
Morel, P. M. 2013. Aristotle: Le Mouvement des Animaux, suivi de La Locomotion des Animaux. Traduction et Présentation par Pierre-Marie Morel (Paris: Vrin).Google Scholar
Moreno, A. 2019. “On Minimal Autonomous Agency: Natural and Artificial,” Complex Systems 27(3): 289–313, doi: 10.25088/ComplexSystems.27.3.289.Google Scholar
Moreno, A. and Mossio, M. 2015. “Biological Autonomy: A Philosophical and Theoretical Enquiry,” Theoria 32(3): 392–395.Google Scholar
Morrison, M. 2002. “Modelling Populations: Pearson and Fisher on Mendelism and Biometry,” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53(1): 39–68.Google Scholar
Morsink, J. 1982. Aristotle on the Generation of Animals: A Philosophical Study (Washington, DC: University of America Press).Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D. 1987. “Quality, Structure, and Emergence in Later Pre-Socratic Philosophy,” Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 2: 127–194.Google Scholar
Müller, J. 2019. “Spot the Differences! The Hidden Philosophical Anthropology in Aristotle’s Biological Writings,” in Keil, G. and Kreft, N. (eds.), Aristotle’s Anthropology (Cambridge University Press), 118–139.Google Scholar
Naddaf, G. 2003. “Anthropology and Politogony in Anaximander of Miletus,” in Couprie, D. L., Hahn, R., and Naddaf, G. (eds.), Anaximander in Context. New Studies in the Origins of Greek Philosophy (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press).Google Scholar
Neander, K. 1991. “The Teleological Notion of ‘Function’,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69: 454–468.Google Scholar
Newmyer, S. T. 1999. “Speaking of Beasts: The Stoics and Plutarch on Animal Reason and the Modern Case Against Animals,” Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 63: 99–110.Google Scholar
Nielsen, K. M. 2008. “The Private Parts of Animals: Aristotle on the Teleology of Sexual Difference,” Phronesis 53: 373–405.Google Scholar
Nielsen, K. M. 2015. “The Constitution of the Soul: Aristotle on Lack of Deliberative Authority,” The Classical Quarterly 65(2): 572–586.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. W. 2004. Spectacles of Truth in Classical Greek Philosophy: Theoria in its Cultural Context (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 1978/1985. Aristotle’s De Motu Animalium: Text with Translation, Commentary and Interpretive Essays by Martha Craven Nussbaum, second edition (Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 1987. “Commentary on Mourelatos,” Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 2: 195–207.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 1994. The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics (Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Nutton, V. 2004. Ancient Medicine (Abingdon: Routledge).Google Scholar
Ogle, W. 1882. Ogle to Darwin, January 17. Darwin Correspondence Project, DCP 13621, www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letters.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, F. 2004. “Aristotle and the Metaphysics of Evolution,” Review of Metaphysics 58: 3–59.Google Scholar
Osbourne [Rowett], C. 2007. Dumb Beasts and Dead Philosophers: Humanity and the Humane in Ancient Philosophy and Literature (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Oser-Grote, C. 2004. Aristoteles und das Corpus Hippocraticum. Die Anatomie und Physiologie des Menschen (Stuttgart: Steiner).Google Scholar
Ostwald, M. 1969. Nomos and the Beginnings of the Athenian Democracy (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Palmer, J. 2016. “Elemental Change in Empedocles,” Rhizomata: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science 4(1): 30–54.Google Scholar
Peck, A. 1942. Aristotle: Generation of Animals (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Peck, A. 1965. Aristotle: Historia Animalium, Books 1–3 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Pellegrin, P. 1982. La classification des animaux chez Aristote (Paris: Les Belles Lettres). [Translated by Preus, A. 1986. Aristotle’s Classification of Animals (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).]Google Scholar
Pellegrin, P. 1985. “Aristotle: A Zoology Without Species,” in Gotthelf, A. (ed.), Aristotle on Nature and Living Things: Philosophical and Historical Studies Presented to David M. Balme on his Seventieth Birthday (Pittsburgh, PA: Mathesis Publications), 95–116.Google Scholar
Pellegrin, P. 1987. “Logical and Biological Difference: The Unity of Aristotle’s Thought,” in Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology (Cambridge University Press), 313–338.Google Scholar
Pellegrin, P. 1996. “Aristote, Hippocrate et Oedipe,” in Wittern, R. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.), Hippokratische Medizin und Antike Philosophie (Hildesheim: Olms), 183–198.Google Scholar
Pellegrin, P. 2015. “Is Politics a Natural Science?” in Lockwood, T. and Samaris, T. (eds.), Aristotle’s Politics: A Critical Guide (Cambridge University Press), 27–45.Google Scholar
Pellegrin, P. and Devereux, D. (eds.) 1990. Biologie, Logique et Metaphysique chez Aristote (Paris: Editions de Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique).Google Scholar
Perilli, L. 2007. “Democritus, Zoology and the Physicians,” in Brancacci, A. and Morel, P.-M. (eds.), Democritus: Science, the Arts, and the Care of the Soul (Leiden: Brill), 143–179.Google Scholar
Pfennig, D. W., Wund, M. A., Schlichting, C., Snell-Rood, E. C., Cruikshank, T., and Moczek, A. 2010. “Phenotypic Plasticity’s Impacts on Diversification and Speciation,” Trends in Ecology and Evolution 25: 459–467.Google Scholar
Pierris, A. L. (ed.) 2005. The Empedoclean Cosmos: Structure, Process and the Question of Cyclicity (Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research).Google Scholar
Pimenova, A. A. 2018. “Plutarch on Anaximander’s Zoogony (Quaest. Conv. Vii 8. 4 730E = 12 A 30 DK),” Philologia Classica 13: 213–219.Google Scholar
Pistelli, H. 1888. Iamblichi Protrepticus (Leipzig: Teubneri).Google Scholar
Polansky, R. 2007. Aristotle’s De Anima (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Popa, T. 2014. “Observing the Invisible Regimen I on Elemental Powers and Higher Order Dispositions,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22: 1–20.Google Scholar
Pormann, P. E. 2018. The Cambridge Companion to Hippocrates (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Poschenrieder, F. 1887. Die Naturwissenschaftlichen Schriften des Aristoteles in ihrem Verhältnis zu den Büchern der Hippokratischen Sammlung (Bamberg: Gärtner).Google Scholar
Preus, A. 1970. “Science and Philosophy in Aristotle’s Generation of Animals,” Journal of the History of Biology 3(1): 1–52.Google Scholar
Primavesi, O. and Rapp, C. 2020. Aristotle’s De Motu Animalium, Proceedings of the XIX. Symposium Aristotelicum (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Provine, W. 1971. The Origins of Theoretical Population Genetics (University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Purcell, E. M. 1977. “Life at Low Reynolds Number,” American Journal of Physics 45: 101–111.Google Scholar
Rackham, H. 1932. Aristotle’s Politics (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Ramsey, G. 2013. “Human Nature in a Post-Essentialist World,” Philosophy of Science 80(5): 983–993.Google Scholar
Rashed, M. 2000. “Alexandre d’Aphrodise lecteur de Protreptique,” in Hamesse, J. (ed.), Les Prologues mediévaux (Turnhout: Brepols).Google Scholar
Reeve, C. D. C. 2012. “Aristotle’s Philosophical Method,” in Shields, C. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Aristotle (Oxford University Press), 150–170.Google Scholar
Reeve, C. D. C. 2019. Aristotle Generation of Animals and History of Animals I, Parts of Animals I, translation with introduction and notes (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett).Google Scholar
Ricciardetto, A. 2014. L’Anonyme de Londres (P. Lit. Lond. 165, Brit. Libr. Inv. 137) (Presses Universitaires de Liège).Google Scholar
Richardson Lear, G. 2005. Happy Lives and the Highest Good: An Essay on Aristotle’s “Nicomachean Ethics” (Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Roberts, J. 1989. “Political Animals in the Nicomachean Ethics,” Phronesis 34: 185–204.Google Scholar
Robinson, H. 2020. “Substance,” in E. N. Zalta (ed.),The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020 edition), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/substance.Google Scholar
Rocca, S. 2003. Animali (e uomini) in Cicerone (De nat. deor 2.121–61) (Genoa: Compagnia dei Librai).Google Scholar
Rosen, J. (ms.) “The Varieties of Necessity in Aristotle’s Physics II.9.”Google Scholar
Ross, G. R. T. 1906. Aristotle, De Sensu and De Memoria. Text and Translation, with Introduction and Commentary (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Ross, W. D. 1955. Aristotle: Parva Naturalia (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Rossetti, L. 2019. “Parmenide Astronomo e Biologo,” Philosophical Inquiry 43: 54–71.Google Scholar
Ruse, M. 1996. Monad to Man (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Russell, D. C. 2014. “Phronesis and the Virtues,” in Polansky, R. (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics (Cambridge University Press), 203–220.Google Scholar
Salleh, A. 2011. “8.7 Million Species on Earth, Say Experts,” ABC Science Newsletter, Wednesday, 24 August, www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2011/08/24/3300326.htm.Google Scholar
Salmieri, G. 2018. “Something(s) in the Way(s) He Moves: Reconsidering the Embryological Argument for Particular Forms in Aristotle,” in Falcon, A. and Lefebvre, D. (eds.), Aristotle’s Generation of Animals: A Critical Guide (Cambridge University Press), 188–206.Google Scholar
Sarton, G. 1952. A History of Science. Vol. 1: Ancient Science Through the Golden Age of Greece (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Sassi, M. M. 2016. “Parmenides and Empedocles on Krasis and Knowledge,” Apeiron 49: 451–469.Google Scholar
Sassi, M. M., Coda, E., and Feola, G. (eds.) 2017. La zoologia di Aristotele e la sua ricezione dall’età ellenistica e romana alle culture medievali (Pisa University Press).Google Scholar
Sauvé Meyer, S. 1992. “Aristotle, Teleology and Reduction,” Philosophical Review 101: 791–825.Google Scholar
Schiefsky, J. M. 2005. Hippocrates: On Ancient Medicine (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar
Schofield, M. 2006. “Aristotle’s Political Ethics,” in Kraut, R. (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics (Oxford: Blackwell), 305–322.Google Scholar
Schwenk, K. and Wagner, G. 2003. “The Relativism of Constraints on Phenotypic Evolution,” in Pigliucci, M. and Preston, K. (eds.), The Evolution of Complex Phenotypes (Oxford University Press), 390–408.Google Scholar
Scott, D. 1999. “Aristotle on Well-Being and Intellectual Contemplation,” Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 73(1): 225–242.Google Scholar
Scott, D. 2015. Levels of Argument: A Comparative Study of Plato’s Republic and Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 1991. “Is Aristotle’s Teleology Anthropocentric?” Phronesis 36: 179–196.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 2005. “Empedocles’ Life Cycles,” in Pierris, A. L. (ed.), The Empedoclean Cosmos: Structure, Process and the Question of Cyclicity (Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research), 331–371.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 2007. Creationism and its Critics in Antiquity (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 2010. “Teleology, Aristotelian and Platonic,” in Lennox, J. G. and Bolton, R. (eds.), Being, Nature, and Life in Aristotle: Essays in Honor of Allan Gotthelf (Cambridge University Press), 5–29.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 2016. “Empedoclean Superorganisms,” Rhizomata 4: 111–125.Google Scholar
Segev, M. 2018. Aristotle on Religion (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Sfendoni-Mentzou, D. (ed.) 2018. Aristotle: Contemporary Perspectives on His Thought. On the 2400th Anniversary of Aristotle’s Birth (Berlin: De Gruyter).Google Scholar
Sfendoni-Mentzou, D. (ed.) 2019. Proceedings of the World Congress “Aristotle 2400 Years” (Aristotle University of Thessaloniki).Google Scholar
Shapiro, J. A. 2011. Evolution: A View from the 21st Century Perspective (Upper Saddle River, NJ: FT Press Science).Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. 1992. “On Fish,” in Fortenbaugh, W. W. and Gutas, D. (eds.), Theophrastus: His Psychological, Doxographical and Scientific Writings (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press).Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. 1995. Theophrastus of Eresus. Sources for His Life, Writings, Thought and Influence. Commentary. Vol. 5: Biology (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. 2004. Alexander of Aphrodisias. Supplement to On the Soul (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. 2010. Peripatetic Philosophy 200 BC–200 AD. An Introduction and Collection of Sources in Translation (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Shields, C. 2007. Aristotle: An Introduction (Abingdon: Routledge).Google Scholar
Shields, C. 2008. “Substance and Life in Aristotle,” in J. Mouracade (ed.), Aristotle on Life, Apeiron Special Issue 41(3): 129–152.Google Scholar
Shields, C. (ed.) 2012. The Oxford Handbook of Aristotle (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Shields, C. 2015. “The Science of the Soul in Aristotle’s Ethics,” in Henry, D. and Nielsen, K. M. (eds.), Bridging the Gap Between Aristotle’s Science and Ethics (Cambridge University Press), 232–253.Google Scholar
Shields, C. 2016. Aristotle’s De Anima. Translated with an Introduction and Commentary. Clarendon Aristotle Series (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G. 1961. The Principles of Animal Taxonomy (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
Simpson, W. M. R., Koons, R. C., and Teh, N. J. (eds.) 2018. Neo-Aristotelian Perspectives on Contemporary Science (Abingdon: Routledge).Google Scholar
Sisko, J. E. 2003. “Taste, Touch, and Temperance in ‘Nicomachean Ethics’ 3.10,” The Classical Quarterly 53(1): 135–140.Google Scholar
Sisko, J. E. 2004. “Reflexive Awareness Does Belong to the Main Function of Perception: Reply to Victor Caston,” Mind New Series, 113(451): 513–521.Google Scholar
Smith, W. 1992. “Regimen, κρῆσις, and the History of Dietetics,” in López Férez, J. A. (ed.), Tratados Hipocráticos (Madrid: Universidad Nacional de Education a Distancia), 263–271.Google Scholar
Sober, E. 1980. “Evolution, Population Thinking, and Essentialism,” Philosophy of Science 47(3): 350–383.Google Scholar
Sober, E. 1984. The Nature of Selection (University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. 1971. “Aristotle on Demarcating the Five Senses,” The Philosophical Review, 80: 55–79. [Reprinted in J. Barnes, M. Schofield, and R. Sorabji (eds.) 1979. Articles on Aristotle. Volume 4: Psychology and Aesthetics (London: Duckworth), 76–92.]Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. 1974. “Body and Soul in Aristotle,” Philosophy 49(187): 63–89.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. 1992. “Intentionality and Physiological Processes: Aristotle’s Theory of Sense Perception,” in Nussbaum, M. and Rorty, A. O. (eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima (Oxford University Press), 195–225.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. 1993. Animal Minds and Human Morals (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Spelman, E. 2003. “Aristotle and the Politicization of the Soul,” in Harding, S. and Hintikka, M. B. (eds.), Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science (Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands), 17–30.Google Scholar
Steel, C. 1997. Priscianus on Theophrastus on Sense Perception with “Simplicius” on Aristotle On the Soul 2.5–2.12 (London: Duckworth).Google Scholar
Stein, N. 2016. “Explanation and Hypothetical Necessity,” Ancient Philosophy 36(2): 1–30.Google Scholar
Stoyles, B. J. 2013. “Megista Genê and Division in Aristotle’s Generation of Animals,” Apeiron 46(1): 1–25.Google Scholar
Strange, S. K. 1985. “The Double Explanation in the Timaeus,” Ancient Philosophy 5: 25–39.Google Scholar
Sultan, S. 2015. Organism and Environment. Ecological Development, Niche Construction, and Adaptation (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Taylor, T. 1808. Aristotle: The Treatises On the Soul; On Sense and Sensibilities; On Memory and Reminiscence; On Sleep and Wakefulness; On Dreams; On Divination by Sleep; On the Common Motion of Animals; On the Generation of Animals; On the Length and Shortness of Life; On Youth and Old Age, Life and Death; and On Respiration (Frome: Prometheus Trust).Google Scholar
Taylor, T. 1809. The History of Animals by Aristotle; and, his treatise On Physiognomy (Frome: Prometheus Trust).Google Scholar
Taylor, T. 1810. Aristotle. The Treatises on the Parts, and Progressive Motion of Animals, Problems; and His Treatise on Individual Lines (Frome: Prometheus Trust).Google Scholar
Thein, K. 2014. “Aristotle on Why Study Lower Animals (de partibus animalium I, 5, 644b22–645a36),” Eirene. Studia Graeca et Latina 50: 208–229.Google Scholar
Thomas, O. 2015. “Creating Problemata with the Hippocratic Corpus,” in Mayhew, R. (ed.), The Aristotelian Problemata Physica. Philosophical and Scientific Investigations (Leiden: Brill), 79–99.Google Scholar
Thompson, D. 1910. Historia Animalium (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. 1996. “The Hunt for Galen’s Shadow: Alexander of Aphrodisias, De an. 94.7–100.17 Bruns Reconsidered,” in Algra, K. A., van der Horst, P. W., and Runia, D. T. (eds.), Polyhistor: Studies in the History and Historiography of Ancient Philosophy (Leiden: Brill), 265–283.Google Scholar
Tipton, J. A. 2014. Philosophical Biology in Aristotle’s Parts of Animals (Cham: Springer).Google Scholar
Tor, S. 2017. Mortal and Divine in Early Greek Epistemology: A Study of Hesiod, Xenophanes and Parmenides (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Tracy, T. 1969. Physiological Theory and the Doctrine of the Mean in Plato and Aristotle (Chicago, IL: Loyola University Press).Google Scholar
Trépanier, S. 2003. “Empedocles on the Ultimate Symmetry of the World,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 24: 1–57.Google Scholar
Treratola, M., Relli, V., Simeone, P., and Alberti, S. 2015. “Epigenetic Inheritance and the Missing Heritability,” Human Genomics 9(1), doi: 10.1186/s40246-015-0041-3.Google Scholar
Tuozzo, T. 1996. “The Function of Human Beings and the Rationality of the Universe: Aristotle and Zeno on Parts and Wholes,” Phoenix 50(2): 146–161.Google Scholar
Tuozzo, T. 2014. “Aristotle and the Discovery of Efficient Causation,” in Schmaltz, T. (ed.), Efficient Causation: The History of a Concept (Oxford University Press), 23–47.Google Scholar
Tutrone, F. 2006. “Lucrezio e la biologia di Aristotele,” Bollettino della fondazione nazionale Vito Fazio-Allmayer 35, 65–104.Google Scholar
Tutrone, F. 2013. “Libraries and Intellectual Debate in the Late Republic: The Case of the Aristotelian Corpus,” in König, J., Oikonomopoulou, K., and Woolf, G. (eds.), Ancient Libraries (Cambridge University Press), 152–166.Google Scholar
van der Eijk, P. 1995. “Aristotle on ‘Distinguished Physicians’ and on the Medical Significance of Dreams,” in van der Eijk, P., Horstmanshoff, H. F. J., and Schrijvers, P. H. (eds.), Ancient Medicine in Its Socio-Cultural Context (Amsterdam: Rodopi Press), 447–459.Google Scholar
van der Eijk, P. 2005. Medicine and Philosophy in Classical Antiquity. Doctors and Philosophers on Nature, Soul, Health and Disease (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
van der Eijk, P. 2007a. “Aristoteles und das Corpus Hippocraticum. Die Anatomie und Physiologie des Menschen by Carolin M. Oser-Grote. Review by P. van der Eijk,” Gnomon 79: 488–492.Google Scholar
van der Eijk, P. 2007b. “Les mouvements de la matière dans la génération des animaux selon Aristote,” in Boudon-Millot, V., Guardasole, A., and Magdelaine, C. (eds.), La science médicale antique: Nouveaux regards (Paris: Beauchesne), 405–424.Google Scholar
van der Eijk, P. 2008. “The Role of Medicine in the Formation of Early Greek Philosophical Thought,” in Curd, P. and Graham, D. W. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Pre-Socratic Philosophy (Oxford University Press), 385–412.Google Scholar
van der Eijk, P. 2009. “Aristotle: What a Thing for You to Say! Galen’s Engagement with Aristotle and Aristotelians,” in Gill, C., Whitmarsh, T., and Wilkins, J. (eds.), Galen and the World of Knowledge (Cambridge University Press), 261–281.Google Scholar
van der Eijk, P. 2012. “Hippocrate Aristotélicien,” Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Inscriptions et Belles Lettres 4: 1501–1522.Google Scholar
van der Eijk, P. 2013. “Quelques observations sur la réception d’Aristote dans la médecine gréco-romaine de l’époque impériale”, in: Lehmann, Y. (Ed.), Aristoteles Romanus . La réception de la science aristotélicienne dans l’Empire gréco-romain (Brussels: Brepols), 183–193.Google Scholar
van der Eijk, P. and Hulskamp, M. 2010. “Stages in the Reception of Aristotle’s Works on Sleep and Dreams in Hellenistic and Imperial Philosophical and Medical Thought,” in Grellard, C. and Morel, P.-M. (eds.), Les Parva naturalia d’Aristote. Fortune antique et medieval (Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne), 47–75.Google Scholar
van Fraassen, B. 1980. “A Re-Examination of Aristotle’s Philosophy of Science,” Dialogue 9: 20–45.Google Scholar
Varner, G. E. 2012. Personhood, Ethics, and Animal Cognition: Situating Animals in Hare’s Two Level Utilitarianism (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
von Staden, H. 1989. Herophilus: The Art of Medicine in Early Alexandria (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
von Staden, H. 1997. “Teleology and Mechanism: Aristotelian Biology and Early Hellenistic Medicine,” in Kullmann, W. and Föllinger, S. (eds.), Aristotelische Biologie. Intentionen, Methode, Ergebnisse (Stuttgart: Steiner), 183–208.Google Scholar
Wagner, A. 2011. The Origin of Evolutionary Innovations: A Theory of Transformative Change in Living Systems (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Wagner, A. 2012. “The Role of Robustness in Phenotypic Adaptation and Innovation,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B 279: 1249–1258.Google Scholar
Wagner, G. and Altenberg, L. 1996. “Complex Adaptations and the Evolution of Evolvability,” Evolution 50: 967–976.Google Scholar
Walsh, D. M. 2006. “Evolutionary Essentialism,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57: 425–448.Google Scholar
Walsh, D. M. 2012. “Situated Adaptationism,” in Kabesenche, W., O’Rourke, M., and Slater, M. (eds.), The Environment: Philosophy, Science, Ethics (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 89–116.Google Scholar
Walsh, D. M. 2015. Organisms, Agency, and Evolution (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Walsh, D. M. 2017. “Chance Caught on the Wing: Metaphysical Commitment or Methodological Artifact?” in Huneman, P. and Walsh, D. M. (eds.), Challenging the Modern Synthesis: Adaptation, Development, Inheritance (Oxford University Press), 239–260.Google Scholar
Walsh, D. M., Ariew, A., and Matthen, M. 2017. “Four Pillars of Statisticalism,” Philosophy, Theory and Practice in Biology 9(1), http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/ptb.6959004.0009.001.Google Scholar
Walsh, D. and Weibe, K. 2020. “The Being of Living Beings: Foundationalist Materialism Versus Hylomorphism,” in Meincke, A.-S. and Dupré, J. (eds.), Biological Individuality: Perspectives from Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Biology (Abingdon: Routledge), ch. 6.Google Scholar
Wardy, R. 1993. “Aristotelian Rainfall or the Lore of Averages,” Phronesis 38: 18–30.Google Scholar
Wehrli, F. 1951. “Ethik und Medizin. Zur Vorgeschichte der Aristotelischen Mesonlehre,” Museum Helveticum, 8: 36–62.Google Scholar
Wehrli, F. 1955. Die Schule des Aristoteles. Vol. 8: Eudemus von Rhodos (Basel: Schwabe).Google Scholar
West Eberhard, M. J. 2003. Developmental Plasticity and Evolution (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Whewell, W. 1837. History of the Inductive Sciences (London: John Parker).Google Scholar
Whewell, W. 1840. The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences (London: John Parker).Google Scholar
White, S. 2002. “Eudemus the Naturalist,” in Fortenbaugh, W. W. and Bodnar, I. (eds.), Eudemus of Rhodes (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books), 207–241.Google Scholar
Whiting, J. 1986. “Human Nature and Intellectualism in Aristotle,” Archiv Für Geschichte Der Philosophie 68(1): 70–95.Google Scholar
Whiting, J. 1988. “Aristotle’s Function Argument,” Ancient Philosophy 8: 33–48.Google Scholar
Wilberding, J. 2011. Porphyry, To Gaurus on How Embryos are Ensouled (Bristol: Bristol Classical Press).Google Scholar
Wilberding, J. 2015. “Plato’s Embryology,” Early Science and Medicine 20: 150–168.Google Scholar
Wilberding, J. 2016. Forms, Soul, and Embryos: Neoplatonists on Human Reproduction (Abingdon: Routledge).Google Scholar
Wilberding, J. Forthcoming. “Plants and Spontaneous Generation in GA 3.11,” in Föllinger, S. (ed), Aristotle’s Generation of Animals: A Comprehensive Approach.Google Scholar
Wilford, F. A. 1968. “Embryological Analogies in Empedocles’ Cosmology,” Phronesis 13: 108–118.Google Scholar
Wilkins, J. 2015. “Food and Health in Problemata 21–22: Cooking (pepsis) in the Kitchen and ‘Cooking’ (pepsis) in the Body,” in Mayhew, R. (ed.), The Aristotelian Problemata Physica. Philosophical and Scientific Investigations (Leiden: Brill), 255–271.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. 2013. Structure and Method in Aristotle’s Meterologica: A More Disorderly Nature (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Witt, C. 1985. “Form, Reproduction, and Inherited Characteristics in Aristotle’s GA,” Phronesis 30(1): 46–57.Google Scholar
Witt, C. 1998. “Form, Normativity and Gender in Aristotle. A Feminist Perspective,” in Freeland, C. A. (ed.), Feminist Interpretations of Aristotle (University Park, PN: Penn State University Press), 117–136.Google Scholar
Witt, C. 2003. Ways of Being in Aristotle: Potentiality and Actuality in Aristotle’s Metaphysics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Witt, C. 2012. “Aristotle on Deformed Animal Kinds,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 43: 83–106.Google Scholar
Witt, C. 2015a. “In Defense of the Craft Analogy: Artifacts and Natural Teleology,” in Leunissen, M. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics: A Critical Guide (Cambridge University Press), 107–120.Google Scholar
Witt, C. 2015b. “‘As If by Convention Alone’: The Unstable Ontology of Aristotle’s Ethics,” in Henry, D. and Nielsen, K. M. (eds.), Bridging the Gap Between Aristotle’s Science and Ethics (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Woolf, R. 1999. “The Coloration of Aristotelian Eye-jelly: A Note on On Dreams 459b–460a,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 37(3): 385–391.Google Scholar
Wright, L. 1973. “Functions,” The Philosophical Review 82: 139–168.Google Scholar
Wright, S. 1932. “The Roles of Mutation, Inbreeding, Crossbreeding, and Selection in Evolution,” Proceedings of the 6th International Congress of Genetics 1: 356–366.Google Scholar
Zammito, J. 2018. The Gestation of German Biology (University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Zatta, C. 2017. Interconnectedness: The Living World of Early Greek Philosophers (Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Sophia M. Connell, Birkbeck College, University of London
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle's Biology
  • Online publication: 14 May 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108181792.020
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Sophia M. Connell, Birkbeck College, University of London
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle's Biology
  • Online publication: 14 May 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108181792.020
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Sophia M. Connell, Birkbeck College, University of London
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle's Biology
  • Online publication: 14 May 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108181792.020
Available formats
×