Book contents
- Reviews
- Byron and the Poetics of Adversity
- Byron and the Poetics of Adversity
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 Don Juan and the English Language
- 2 Byron Agonistes, 1809–1816
- 3 Manfred
- 4 Byron and the “Wrong Revolutionary Poetical System”
- 5 Byron, Blake, and the Adversity of Poetics
- 6 The Stubborn Foe
- Notes
- Index
4 - Byron and the “Wrong Revolutionary Poetical System”
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 November 2022
- Reviews
- Byron and the Poetics of Adversity
- Byron and the Poetics of Adversity
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 Don Juan and the English Language
- 2 Byron Agonistes, 1809–1816
- 3 Manfred
- 4 Byron and the “Wrong Revolutionary Poetical System”
- 5 Byron, Blake, and the Adversity of Poetics
- 6 The Stubborn Foe
- Notes
- Index
Summary
Keying off Thomas Moore’s assessment of Romanticism as “mannerist” and Byron’s exploration of his own “medley style” in Manfred, Byron once again used Pope’s performative poetics to take a critical measure of the dominant verse practices of his period. Reflecting on the extreme subjectivity of Romantic styles of expression, Byron argued that the highly subjective Romantic revolutions of the word called all poetic and moral “norms” to a self-critical accounting. Cantos III and IV of Childe Harold took the cases of the eighteenth-century Enlightenment and the French Revolution as a warning to the poets and poetry of Romantic Enlightenment. Henceforth, Byron suggested, poetic freedom would entail zero degree writing: verse would be located at the imperiled “inner standing point” – he called it “Liberty” – of a naked and uncertain address
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Byron and the Poetics of Adversity , pp. 103 - 118Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022