References

Christopher Whitton

Acosta-Hughes, B., Lehnus, L. and Stephens, S., eds. (2011) Brill’s companion to Callimachus, Leiden.Google Scholar

Adamietz, J. (1966) M. Fabi Quintiliani Institutionis oratoriae liber III, Munich.Google Scholar

Adamietz, J. (1986) ‘Quintilians “Institutio oratoria”’, ANRW ii.32.4: 2226–71.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (2003) Bilingualism and the Latin language, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Ahlheid, F. (1983) Quintilian. The preface to Book VIII and comparable passages in the Institutio oratoria, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Albaladejo, T., del Rio, E. and Caballero, J. A., eds. (1998) Quintiliano: historia y actualidad de la retórica, 3 vols., Calahorra.Google Scholar

Alberte González, A. (1993) ‘Dialogus de oratoribus versus Institutio oratoria’, Minerva 7: 255–67.Google Scholar

von Albrecht, M. (1964) Silius Italicus: Freiheit und Gebundenheit römischer Epik, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

von Albrecht, M. (1999) Roman epic: an interpretive introduction, Leiden.Google Scholar

Manutius, Aldus (Manuzio, Aldo) (1508) C. Plinii Secundi Novocomensis epistolarum libri decem etc., Venice (with 2nd edn, 1518).Google Scholar

Alexander, M. C. (2002) The case for the prosecution in the Ciceronian era, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Alfonsi, L. (1962) ‘Pliniana’, Aevum 36: 171.Google Scholar

Allen, G. (2000) Intertextuality, London.Google Scholar

Allen, P. S. (1906) Opus epistolarum Des. Erasmi Roterodami. Vol. I: 1484–1518, Oxford.Google Scholar

Anderson, G. (1993) The Second Sophistic: a cultural phenomenon in the Roman Empire, London.Google Scholar

Anderson, W. S. (1982) Essays in Roman satire, Princeton.Google Scholar

André, J.-M. (1983) ‘L’otium chez Quintilien: pédagogie et magistère moral’, in Hommages à Jean Cousin, Paris: 193–206.Google Scholar

André, J.-M. (1991) Le vocabulaire latin de l’anatomie, Paris.Google Scholar

Anguissola, A. (2012) Difficillima imitatio: immagine e lessico delle copie tra Grecia e Roma, Rome.Google Scholar

Aricò, G. (1995) ‘Plinio il Giovane e la poesia’, in Storia, letteratura e arte a Roma nel secondo secolo dopo Cristo, Florence: 27–41.Google Scholar

Armisen-Marchetti, M. (1990) ‘Pline le Jeune et le sublime’, REL 68: 88–98.Google Scholar

Ash, R. (1997) ‘Warped intertextualities: Naevius and Sallust at Tacitus Histories 2.12.2’, Histos 1: 42–50.Google Scholar

Ash, R. (2013) ‘Drip-feed invective: Pliny, self-fashioning, and the Regulus letters’, in Marmodoro, A. and Hill, J., eds., The author’s voice in classical and late antiquity, Oxford: 207–30.Google Scholar

Ash, R. (2017) Tacitus. Annals book XV, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Aßfahl, G. (1932) Vergleich und Metapher bei Quintilian, Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Atzert, W. (1949) ‘Praefatio’, in Atzert, W. and Ax, W., M. Tulli Ciceronis. Fasc. 48: De officiis, De uirtutibus, Leipzig: iii–xxxviii.Google Scholar

Audano, S. (2016) ‘Et hominem esse te et hominis patrem: la chiusa di una lettera di Plinio il Giovane (IX 12, 2) e il recupero di una sententia consolatoria’, Aevum 90: 189–203.Google Scholar

Augoustakis, A., ed. (2010) Brill’s companion to Silius Italicus, Leiden.Google Scholar

Auhagen, U. (2003) ‘Lusus und gloria – Plinius’ hendecasyllabi (Ep. 4, 14; 5, 3 und 7, 4)’, in Castagna and Lefèvre 2003: 3–13.Google Scholar

Austin, R. G. (1948) Quintiliani Institutionis oratoriae liber XII, Oxford.Google Scholar

Austin, R. G. (1986) Aeneidos liber sextus, Oxford.Google Scholar

Avenarius, W. (1956) ‘Sallust und der rhetorische Schulunterricht’, Rendiconti dell’Istituto Lombardo. Classe di lettere e scienze morali e storiche 89/90: 343–52.Google Scholar

Ax, W. (2000) ‘Die Geschichtsschreibung bei Quintilian’, in Ax, W. (ed. Grewing, F.), Lexis und Logos: Studien zur antiken Grammatik und Rhetorik, Stuttgart: 209–29.Google Scholar

Ax, W. (2011) Quintilians Grammatik (Inst. orat. 1, 4–8): Text, Übersetzung und Kommentar, Berlin.Google Scholar

Axelson, B. (1941) Das Prioritätsproblem Tertullian – Minucius Felix, Lund.Google Scholar

Axelson, B. (1960) ‘Lygdamus und Ovid. Zur Methodik der literarischen Prioritätsbestimmung’, Eranos 58: 92–111.Google Scholar

Aymard, J. (1951) Essai sur les chasses romaines des origines à la fin du siècle des Antonins (Cynegetica), Paris.Google Scholar

Badius, J. (Ascensius) (1516) M. Fabii Quintiliani Oratoriarum institutionum lib. XII. Vna cum annotationibus etc., Paris.Google Scholar

Baier, T. (2003) ‘Κτῆμα oder ἀγώνισμα: Plinius über historischen und rhetorischen Stil (Epist. 5, 8)’, in Castagna and Lefèvre 2003: 69–81.Google Scholar

Baier, T. (2017) ‘Quintilian’s approach to literary history via imitatio and utilitas’, in Bessone and Fucecchi 2017: 47–61.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bailey, C. (1947) Lucretius: De rerum natura, 3 vols., Oxford.Google Scholar

Balbo, A. (2017) ‘Roman oratory and power under the Flavians: some case studies from Pliny the Younger’, in Bessone and Fucecchi 2017: 83–99.Google Scholar

Balsdon, J. P. V. D. (1969) Life and leisure in ancient Rome, London.Google Scholar

Baraz, Y. (2012) ‘Pliny’s epistolary dreams and the ghost of Domitian’, TAPA 142: 105–32.Google Scholar

Baraz, Y. and van den Berg, C., eds. (2013) Intertextuality. AJP 134.1, Baltimore.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1997) ‘Otto punti su una mappa dei naufragi’, MD 39: 209–26. Revised and translated as ‘Some points on a map of shipwrecks’ in Barchiesi, A., Speaking volumes: narrative and intertext in Ovid and other Latin poets, London, 2001: 141–54.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (2005) ‘The search for the perfect book: a PS to the New Posidippus’, in Gutzwiller, K., ed., The New Posidippus: a Hellenistic poetry book, Oxford: 320–42.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (2015) Homeric effects in Virgil’s narrative, Princeton.Google Scholar

Barich, M. (2014) ‘Poet and readers: reflections on the verbal and narrative art of Valerius Flaccus’ Argonautica’, in Heerink, M. and Manuwald, G., eds., Brill’s companion to Valerius Flaccus, Leiden: 28–48.Google Scholar

Barnes, T. D. (1986) ‘The significance of Tacitus’ Dialogus de oratoribus’, HSCP 90: 225–44.Google Scholar

Bartsch, S. (1994) Actors in the audience: theatricality and doublespeak from Nero to Hadrian, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Barwick, K. (1954) Der Dialogus de oratoribus des Tacitus. Motive und Zeit seiner Entstehung, Berlin.Google Scholar

Beall, S. M. (1997) ‘Translation in Aulus Gellius’, CQ 47: 215–26.Google Scholar

Beard, M. (2002) ‘Ciceronian correspondences: making a book out of letters’, in Wiseman, T. P., ed., Classics in progress: essays on ancient Greece and Rome, Oxford: 103–44.Google Scholar

Beck, J.-W. (2012) ‘Der Licinianus-Skandal und das crimen incesti (Plinius epist. 4,11)’, GFA 15: 129–52.Google Scholar

Beck, J.-W. (2013) ‘Pro captu lectoris habent sua fata … – Plinius und der Eklat epist. 6,15’, Hermes 141: 294–308.Google Scholar

Beck, J.-W. (2016) ‘incidi in materiam – Plinius und der Delphin (epist. 9,33)’, GFA 19: 61–87.Google Scholar

Behrendt, A. (2013) Mit Zitaten kommunizieren. Untersuchungen zur Zitierweise in der Korrespondenz des Marcus Tullius Cicero, Rahden.Google Scholar

Bellandi, F. (2016) ‘Cronologia e ideologia politica nelle satire di Giovenale’, in Stramaglia, A., Grazzini, S. and Dimatteo, G., eds., Giovenale tra storia, poesia e ideologia, Berlin: 5–63.Google Scholar

Bernstein, N. W. (2008) ‘Each man’s father served as his teacher: constructing relatedness in Pliny’s Letters’, CA 27: 203–30.Google Scholar

Berry, D. (2004) ‘Literature and persuasion in Cicero’s Pro Archia’, in Powell, J. G. F. and Paterson, J., eds., Cicero the advocate, Oxford: 291–311.Google Scholar

Bessone, F. and Fucecchi, M., eds. (2017) The literary genres in the Flavian age: canons, transformations, reception, Berlin.Google Scholar

Billault, A. (2004) ‘Littérature et rhétorique dans le Discours XVIII de Dion Chrysostome Sur l’entraînement à la parole’, REG 117: 504–18.Google Scholar

Birley, A. R. (2000a) Onomasticon to the Younger Pliny. Letters and Panegyric, Munich.Google Scholar

Birley, A. R. (2000b) ‘The life and death of Cornelius Tacitus’, Historia 49: 230–47.Google Scholar

Birley, A. R. (2016) ‘Pliny’s family, Pliny’s career’, in Gibson and Whitton 2016: 51–66.Google Scholar

Bleisch, P. R. (1998) ‘Altars altered: the Alexandrian tradition of etymological wordplay in Aeneid 1.108–12’, AJP 119: 599–606.Google Scholar

Bliss, F. R. (1951) ‘Valerius Maximus and his sources: a stylistic approach to the problem’, unpublished PhD dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar

Bloom, H. (1973) The anxiety of influence: a theory of poetry, New York.Google Scholar

Bloomer, W. M. (1992) Valerius Maximus and the rhetoric of the new nobility, Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar

Bloomer, W. M. (2007) ‘Roman declamation: the Elder Seneca and Quintilian’, in Dominik and Hall 2007: 297–306.Google Scholar

Boccuto, G. (1990) ‘Sulle idee retoriche di Plinio il Giovane’, in La fortuna e l’opera di Plinio il Giovane. Atti del convegno internazionale di studi, Città di Castello/San Giustino: 111–37.Google Scholar

Boccuto, G. (1991) ‘Plinio Ep. VII 9, 11. Un’affermazione letteraria in distici elegiaci’, A&R 36: 26–36.Google Scholar

Bodel, J. (1995) ‘Minicia Marcella: taken before her time’, AJP 116: 453–60.Google Scholar

Bodel, J. (2015) ‘The publication of Pliny’s letters’, in Marchesi 2015b: 13–108.Google Scholar

Bolkestein, A. M. (1998) ‘Between brackets: (some properties of) parenthetical clauses in Latin. An investigation of the language of Cicero’s letters’, in Risselada, R., ed., Latin in use: Amsterdam studies in the pragmatics of Latin, Amsterdam: 1–17.Google Scholar

Bonifazi, A. (2016) ‘Particle use in Herodotus and Thucydides’, Hellenic Studies Series, Washington, DC (published online at http://chs.harvard.edu).Google Scholar

Bonner, C. (1941) ‘Desired haven’, Harvard Theological Review 34: 49–67.Google Scholar

Bonner, S. F. (1949) Roman declamation in the late Republic and early Empire, Liverpool.Google Scholar

Borgo, A. (1989) ‘Allusione e tecnica citazionale in Seneca (Breu. I, 1; Sall. Iug. I, 1)’, Vichiana 18: 45–51.Google Scholar

Borzsák, I. (1969) ‘Quaestiunculae taciteae’, Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift Rostock. Gesellschafts- und sprachwissenschaftliche Reihe 18: 391–4.Google Scholar

Bosworth, A. B. (2004) ‘Mountain and molehill? Cornelius Tacitus and Quintus Curtius’, CQ 54: 551–67.Google Scholar

Bradley, K. R. (2010) ‘The exemplary Pliny’, in Deroux, C., ed., Studies in Latin literature and Roman history 15, Brussels: 384–422.Google Scholar

Braund, S.M. (1998) ‘Praise and protreptic in early imperial panegyric: Cicero, Seneca, Pliny’, in Whitby, M., ed., The propaganda of power: the role of panegyric in late antiquity, Leiden: 53–76.Google Scholar

Braund, S.M. (2009) Seneca. De clementia, Oxford.Google Scholar

Briggs, W. D. (1917) ‘Source-material for Jonson’s Underwoods and miscellaneous poems’, Modern Philology 15: 277–312.Google Scholar

Brink, C. O. (1963) Horace on poetry: prolegomena to the literary epistles, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Brink, C. O. (1971) Horace on poetry: the ‘Ars poetica’, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Brink, C. O. (1982) Horace on poetry: Epistles book II. The letters to Augustus and Florus, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Brink, C. O. (1989) ‘Quintilian’s De causis corruptae eloquentiae and Tacitus’ Dialogus de oratoribus’, CQ 39: 472–503.Google Scholar

Brink, C. O. (1993) ‘History in the Dialogus de oratoribus and Tacitus the historian: a new approach to an old source’, Hermes 121: 335–49.Google Scholar

Brink, C. O. (1994) ‘Can Tacitus’ Dialogus be dated?’, HSCP 96: 251–80.Google Scholar

Brinton, A. (1983) ‘Quintilian, Plato, and the vir bonus’, Philosophy and Rhetoric 16: 167–84.Google Scholar

Bruère, R. T. (1954) ‘Tacitus and Pliny’s Panegyricus’, CP 49: 161–79.Google Scholar

Bucciarelli, L. (1906) ‘Quintiliano adulatore’, RFIC 34: 321–32.Google Scholar

Buchheit, V. (1977) ‘Catull, Vergil, Martial und Stella in Plinius Epist. 9,25’, SO 52: 83–7.Google Scholar

Büchner, K. (1955) ‘Tacitus und Plinius über die Adoption des römischen Kaisers’, RhM 98: 289–319. Reprinted in Büchner, K., Tacitus und Ausklang. Studien zur römischen Literatur IV, Wiesbaden, 1964: 1–22.Google Scholar

Buchnerus, A. (Buchner, A.) (1644) C. Plinii Caecilii Secundi Epistolarum libri X cum notis, Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Bühler, W. (1982) Zenobii Athoi proverbia vulgari ceteraque memoria aucta. Vol. IV, libri secundi proverbia 1–40 complexum, Göttingen.Google Scholar

Burmannus, P. (Burmann, P. the Elder) (1720) M. Fabii Quinctiliani. De institutione oratoria libri duodecim. Cum notis etc., 2 vols., Leiden.Google Scholar

Bütler, H.-P. (1970) Die geistige Welt des jüngeren Plinius: Studien zur Thematik seiner Briefe, Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Buttmann, (see Spalding 1798–1816).Google Scholar

Cairns, F. (1979) ‘Self-imitation within a generic framework: Ovid, Amores 2.9 and 3.11 and the renuntiatio amoris’, in West and Woodman 1979b: 121–41.Google Scholar

Calboli, G. (1985) ‘Pline le Jeune entre pratique judiciaire et éloquence épidictique’, BAGB 4: 357–74.Google Scholar

Calboli, G. (1993) Rhetorica ad C. Herennium. Introduzione, testo critico, commento, 2nd edn, Bologna.Google Scholar

Calboli, G. (2010) ‘Quintilien et les déclamateurs’, in Galand et al. 2010: 11–28.Google Scholar

Cameron, A. D. E. (2016) ‘The fate of Pliny’s Letters in the late Empire’, in Gibson and Whitton 2016: 463–81.Google Scholar

Canobbio, A. (2015) ‘Echi di Marziale nell’epistola 4.14 di Plinio il Giovane’, Prometheus 41: 189–207.Google Scholar

Canobbio, A. (2017) ‘Elementi Senecani nell’epistola 3.5 di Plinio il Giovane’, Athenaeum 105: 120–36.Google Scholar

Canobbio, A. (2018) ‘Plinio il Giovane, Svetonio e un invito a pubblicare: analisi intertestuale dell’epistola 5.10’, SIFC 16: 52–70.Google Scholar

Caplan, H. (1964) [Cicero] Ad C. Herennium de ratione dicendi (Rhetorica ad Herennium), Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Carey, S. (2003) Pliny’s catalogue of culture: art and empire in the Natural History, Oxford.Google Scholar

Carlon, J. (2009) Pliny’s women: constructing virtue and creating identity in the Roman world, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Carlsson, G. (1922) Zur Textkritik der Pliniusbriefe, Lund.Google Scholar

Carruthers, M. (1990) The book of memory, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Carruthers, M. (1998) The craft of thought: meditation, rhetoric, and the making of images, ad 400–1200, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Castagna, L. and Lefèvre, E., eds. (2003) Plinius der Jüngere und seine Zeit, Munich.Google Scholar

Catanaeus, I. M. (Cattaneo, G. M.) (1506) C. Plinii Caecilii Secundi Epistolarum libri novem … cum enarrationibus etc., Milan (with 2nd edn, 1518).Google Scholar

Cavallo, G., Fedeli, P. and Giardina, A., eds. (1989) Lo spazio letterario di Roma antica, 2 vols., Rome.Google Scholar

Cave, T. (1985) The cornucopian text: problems of writing in the French Renaissance, Oxford.Google Scholar

Celentano, M. S. (2000) ‘Il sesto libro dell’Institutio oratoria di Quintiliano: la trasmissione del sapere, l’attualità storica, l’esperienza autobiografica’, in Calboli Montefusco, L., ed., Papers in rhetoric iii, Bologna: 61–74.Google Scholar

Celentano, M. S. (2003) ‘Book VI of Quintilian’s Institutio oratoria: the transmission of knowledge, historical and cultural topicalities, and autobiographic experience’, in Tellegen-Couperus 2003: 119–28.Google Scholar

Cellarius, C. (Keller, C.) (1693) C. Plinii Secundi Epistolae et Panegyricus etc., Leipzig (with 2nd edn, 1700; 3rd edn, 1711).Google Scholar

Chaplin, J. D. (2000) Livy’s exemplary history, Oxford.Google Scholar

Citroni, M. (1995) Poesia e lettori in Roma antica: forme della comunicazione letteraria, Rome.Google Scholar

Citroni, M. (2004) ‘Martial, Pline le jeune et l’identité du genre de l’épigramme latine’, Dictynna 1: 1–18.Google Scholar

Citroni, M. (2011) ‘Arte allusiva: Pasquali and onward’, in Acosta-Hughes, Lehnus and Stephens 2011: 566–86.Google Scholar

Citroni, M. (2017) ‘Antiqui, veteres, novi: images of the literary past and the impulse to progress in the cultural program of Quintilian’, in Bessone and Fucecchi 2017: 19–45.Google Scholar

Cizek, A. N. (1994) Imitatio et tractatio. Die literarisch-rhetorischen Grundlagen der Nachahmung in Antike und Mittelalter, Tübingen.Google Scholar

Classen, C. J. (1965) ‘Der Aufbau des 12. Buches der Institutio oratoria Quintilians’, MH 22: 181–90.Google Scholar

Clausen, W. V. and Zetzel, J. E. G. (2004) Commentum Cornuti in Persium, Munich.Google Scholar

Clauss, J. J. (1997) ‘Domestici hostes: the Nausicaa in Medea, the Catiline in Hannibal’, MD 39: 165–85.Google Scholar

Cole, C. N. (1906) ‘Quintilian’s quotations from the Latin poets’, CR 20: 47–51.Google Scholar

Coleman, K. M. (1986) ‘The emperor Domitian and literature’, ANRW ii.32.5: 3087–115.Google Scholar

Coleman, K. M. (1988) Statius Silvae IV, Oxford.Google Scholar

Coleman, K. M. (2012) ‘Bureaucratic language in the correspondence between Pliny and Trajan’, TAPA 142: 189–238.Google Scholar

Colson, F. H. (1924) M. Fabii Quintiliani Institutionis oratoriae liber I, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Colton, R. E. (1965) ‘Juvenal’s second Satire and Martial’, CJ 61: 68–71.Google Scholar

Colton, R. E. (1991) Juvenal’s use of Martial’s epigrams: a study of literary influence, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Colvin, S. C. (2006) ‘Atticist–Asianist controversy’, in Sloane, T. O., ed., Encyclopaedia of rhetoric, Oxford.Google Scholar

Connolly, J. (2007) The state of speech: rhetoric and political thought in ancient Rome, Princeton.Google Scholar

Connor, W. R. (1962) ‘Vim quandam incredibilem – a tradition concerning the oratory of Pericles’, C&M 23: 23–33.Google Scholar

Connors, C. (1997) ‘Field and forum: culture and agriculture in Roman rhetoric’, in Dominik, W. J., ed., Roman eloquence: rhetoric in society and literature, London: 71–89.Google Scholar

Consoli, S. (1900) Il neologismo negli scritti di Plinio il Giovane, Palermo.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1974) Memoria dei poeti e sistema letterario: Catullo, Virgilio, Ovidio, Lucano, Turin.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1976) ‘Proemi al mezzo’, RCCM 18: 263–73. Revised and translated as ‘Proems in the middle’, in F. M. Dunn and T. Cole, eds., Beginnings in classical literature, Cambridge, 1992: 147–59.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1981) ‘A proposito dei modelli in letteratura’ (review of West and Woodman 1979b), MD 6: 147–60.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1986) The rhetoric of imitation: genre and poetic memory in Virgil and other Latin poets (transl. Segal, C.), Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1992) ‘Rhetoric of imitation as rhetoric of culture: some new thoughts’ (transl. Most, G. W.), Vergilius 38: 45–55.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (2017) Stealing the club from Hercules: on imitation in Latin poetry, Berlin.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. and Barchiesi, A. (1989) ‘Imitazione e arte allusiva: modi e funzioni dell’intertestualità’, in Cavallo, Fedeli and Giardina 1989: i, 81–114.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. and Most, G. (1996) ‘Imitatio (μίμησις)’, in Hornblower, S. and Spawforth, A., eds., The Oxford classical dictionary, 3rd edn, Oxford: 749.Google Scholar

Cook, A. B. (1901) ‘Associated reminiscences’, CR 15: 338–45.Google Scholar

Corke-Webster, J. (2017) ‘The early reception of Pliny the Younger in Tertullian of Carthage and Eusebius of Caesarea’, CQ 67: 247–62.Google Scholar

Cortius, G. (Kortte, G.) and Longolius, P. D. (1734) Caii Plinii Caecilii Secundi Epistolarum libros decem cum notis selectis, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Courtney, E. (1980) A commentary on the Satires of Juvenal, London (with corrected reprint, Berkeley 2013).Google Scholar

Courtney, E. (1993) The fragmentary Latin poets, Oxford.Google Scholar

Courtney, E. (1995) Musa lapidaria: a selection of Latin verse inscriptions, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar

Courtney, E. (2003) ‘Notes on Quintilian’, Philologus 147: 360–3.Google Scholar

Cousin, J. (1967) Études sur Quintilien, Amsterdam (orig. 2 vols., Paris 1936).Google Scholar

Cousin, J. (1975–80) Quintilien. Institution oratoire, 7 vols., Paris.Google Scholar

Cova, P. V. (1966) La critica letteraria di Plinio il Giovane, Brescia.Google Scholar

Cova, P. V. (1969) ‘Problemi della lettera pliniana sulla storia’, Aevum 43: 177–99.Google Scholar

Cova, P. V. (1972) ‘Arte allusiva e stilizzazione retorica nelle lettere di Plinio’, Aevum 46: 16–36.Google Scholar

Cova, P. V. (1975) ‘Contributo allo studio della lettera pliniana sulla storia’, RCCM 17: 117–39.Google Scholar

Cova, P. V. (1997) ‘La presenza di Seneca in Plinio il Giovane’, Paideia 52: 95–107.Google Scholar

Cova, P. V. (2001) ‘Plinio il Giovane contro Plinio il Vecchio’, BStudLat 31: 55–67.Google Scholar

Cova, P. V. (2003) ‘Plinio il Giovane contro Quintiliano’, in Castagna and Lefèvre 2003: 83–94.Google Scholar

Cova, P. V., Gazich, R., Manzoni, G. E. and Melzani, G. (1990) Aspetti della ‘paideia’ di Quintiliano, Milan.Google Scholar

Cowan, J. (1889) Pliny’s Letters books I and II, London.Google Scholar

Cowan, R. (2014) ‘Fingering Cestos: Martial’s Catullus’ Callimachus’, in Augoustakis, A., ed., Flavian poetry and its Greek past, Leiden: 345–71.Google Scholar

Crook, J. A. (1967) Law and life of Rome, London.Google Scholar

Cugusi, P. (1968) Review of Scarcia 1967, RCCM 10: 328–32.Google Scholar

Cugusi, P. (1974) ‘Leggendo l’epistolario pliniano’, in Cugusi, P., Ricerche sulla letteratura latina dell’età traianea, Cagliari: 3–38.Google Scholar

Cugusi, P. (1983) Evoluzione e forme dell’epistolografia latina nella tarda repubblica e nei primi due secoli dell’impero, Rome.Google Scholar

Cugusi, P. (2003) ‘Qualche riflessione sulle idee retoriche di Plinio il Giovane: Epistulae 1, 20 e 9, 26’, in Castagna and Lefèvre 2003: 95–122.Google Scholar

Curtius, E. R. (1953) European literature and the Latin Middle Ages (transl. Trask, W. R.), London.Google Scholar

Damon, C. (2010) ‘Déjà vu or déjà lu? History as intertext’, PLLS 14: 375–88.Google Scholar

Danesi Marioni, G. (1999) ‘Di padre in figlio: il “vir fortis” in lotta con la fortuna nei due Seneca’, InvLuc 21: 123–32.Google Scholar

Deane, S. N. (1918) ‘Greek in Pliny’s letters’, Classical Weekly 12: 41–4, 50–4.Google Scholar

Dekel, E. (2012) Virgil’s Homeric lens, New York.Google Scholar

Delarue, F. (2004) ‘La sublime et Pline, Ep. IX, 26’, in Nadjo, L. and Gavoille, E., eds., Epistulae antiquae III, Leuven: 449–61.Google Scholar

della Casa, A. (1969) Il dubius sermo di Plinio, Genoa.Google Scholar

Derrida, J. (1976) Of grammatology (transl. Spivak, G. C.), Baltimore.Google Scholar

Deuchler, F. (2017) Quintilian: Nachantike Spuren der Institutio oratoria. Mutmaßungen über das Libro dell’arte von Cennini. Notate zu Sulzers Theorie, Bern.Google Scholar

van Deusen, N. (2013) ‘Cicero through Quintilian’s eyes in the Middle Ages’, in van Deusen, N., ed., Cicero refused to die: Ciceronian influence through the centuries, Leiden: 47–64.Google Scholar

Devillers, O., ed. (2015) Autour de Pline le Jeune. En l’honneur de Nicole Méthy, Bordeaux.Google Scholar

Di Brazzano, S. (2004) Laus Pisonis: introduzione, edizione critica, traduzione e commento, Pisa.Google Scholar

Dienel, R. (1915) ‘Quintilian und der Rednerdialog des Tacitus’, WS 37: 239–71.Google Scholar

Dingel, J. (1988) Scholastica materia. Untersuchungen zu den Declamationes minores und der Institutio oratoria, Berlin.Google Scholar

D’Ippolito, G. (2000) ‘Il concetto di intertestualità nel pensiero degli antichi’, in Bécares, V., Pordomingo, F. and Cortés Tovar, R., eds., Intertextualidad en las literaturas griega y latina, Madrid: 13–32.Google Scholar

Dominik, W. J. (2007) ‘Tacitus and Pliny on oratory’, in Dominik and Hall 2007: 323–38.Google Scholar

Dominik, W. J. and Hall, J., eds. (2007) A companion to Roman rhetoric, Malden, MA.Google Scholar

Dominik, W. J., Garthwaite, J. and Roche, P. A., eds. (2009) Writing politics in imperial Rome, Leiden.Google Scholar

Döpp, S. (1985) ‘Cicero-Rezeption bei Quintilian am Beispiel von inst. orat. 12, 2, 23–26’, WS 98: 159–71.Google Scholar

Döpp, S. (1986) ‘Die Nachwirkung von Ciceros rhetorischen Schriften bei Quintilian und in Tacitus’ Dialogus. Eine typologische Skizze’, in Neukam, P., ed., Reflexionen antiker Kulturen, Munich: 7–26.Google Scholar

Döpp, S. (2008) ‘Verecundia in Institutio oratoria 12,5,1–4: Wie Quintilian Cicero, De oratore 1,119–122 und Seneca, Epistulae morales 11 rezipiert’, GFA 11: 241–7.Google Scholar

Dorandi, T. (2000) Le stylet et la tablette. Dans le secret des auteurs antiques, Paris.Google Scholar

Doulamis, K., ed. (2011) Echoing narratives: studies of intertextuality in Greek and Roman prose fiction, Groningen.Google Scholar

Dozier, C. A. (2012) ‘Poetry, politics, and pleasure in Quintilian’, in Sluiter, I. and Rosen, R. M., eds., Aesthetic value in classical antiquity, Leiden: 345–63.Google Scholar

Dugan, J. (2001) ‘How to make (and break) a Cicero: epideixis, textuality and self-fashioning in the Pro Archia and In Pisonem’, CA 20: 35–77.Google Scholar

Dugan, J. (2005) Making a new man: Ciceronian self-fashioning in the rhetorical works, Oxford.Google Scholar

Duncan-Jones, R. P. (2016) ‘The finances of a senator’, in Gibson and Whitton 2016: 89–106. Modified reprint of Duncan-Jones, R. P., The economy of the Roman Empire, 2nd edn, Cambridge, 1982: 17–32.Google Scholar

Dupont, F. (1997) ‘Recitatio and the reorganization of the space of public discourse’, in Habinek, T. and Schiesaro, A., eds., The Roman cultural revolution, Cambridge: 44–59.Google Scholar

Durry, M. (1938) Pline le Jeune. Panégyrique de Trajan. Préfacé, édité et commenté, Paris.Google Scholar

Dyck, A. R. (2010) ‘Cicero’s abridgement of his speeches for publication’, in Horster, M. and Reitz, C., eds., Condensing texts – condensed texts, Stuttgart: 369–74.Google Scholar

Earl, D. C. (1961) The political thought of Sallust, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Eck, W. (2001) ‘Die große Pliniusinschrift aus Comum: Funktion und Monument’, in Bertinelli, G. A. and Donati, A., eds., Varia epigraphica, Faenza: 225–35. Revised version in Eck, W., Monument und Inschrift: Gesammelte Aufsätze zur senatorischen Repräsentation in der Kaiserzeit, Berlin, 2010: 299–310.Google Scholar

Eco, U. (1992) Interpretation and overinterpretation, ed. Collini, S., Cambridge.Google Scholar

Edmunds, L. (2001) Intertextuality and the reading of Roman poetry, Baltimore.Google Scholar

Edmunds, L. (2015) ‘Pliny the Younger on his verse and Martial’s non-recognition of Pliny as a poet’, HSCP 108: 309–60.Google Scholar

Edwards, R. (2008) ‘Hunting for boars with Tacitus and Pliny’, CA 27: 35–58.Google Scholar

Egelhaaf-Gaiser, U. (2002) ‘Panegyrik, Denkmal und Publikum: Plinius, Brief 8,4 und die Kommemoration der Dakertriumphe im Orts- und Medienwandel’, in Auffarth, C. and Rüpke, J., eds., Ἐπιτομὴ τῆς οἰκουμένης. Studien zur römischen Religion in Antike und Neuzeit, Stuttgart: 113–37.Google Scholar

Ellendt, F. T. (1840) M. Tulli Ciceronis De oratore libri tres, 2 vols., Königsberg.Google Scholar

Elliott, J. (2015) ‘The epic vantage-point: Roman historiographical allusion reconsidered’, Histos 9: 277–311.Google Scholar

Elsner, J. (2014) ‘Introduction’, in Elsner and Meyer 2014: 1–34.Google Scholar

Elsner, J. and Meyer, M., eds. (2014) Art and rhetoric in Roman culture, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Emlein, F. (1907) De locis quos ex Ciceronis orationibus in Institutionis oratoriae duodecim libris laudavit Quintilianus, Karlsruhe.Google Scholar

Ernst, W. (2014) ‘Plinius, Epistulae 8.14: Abstimmungsprobleme im römischen Senat’, Fundamina 20: 240–57.Google Scholar

Eussner, A. (1881) ‘Adversarien’, Blätter für das bayerische Gymnasialschulwesen 17: 385–94.Google Scholar

Evans, M. (1983) ‘Italian manuscript illumination 1460–1560’, in Kren, T., ed., Renaissance painting in manuscripts: treasures from the British Library, London: 87–141.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (1978a) ‘Imitation and evolution: the discussion of rhetorical imitation in Cicero De oratore 2. 87–97’, CP 73: 1–16.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (1978b) ‘Imitation and decline: rhetorical theory and practice in the first century after Christ’, CP 73: 102–16.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (1982) ‘Quintilian on performance: traditional and personal elements in Institutio 11.3’, Phoenix 36: 243–63.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (1988) ‘Varietas and satietas: De oratore 3.96–103 and the limits of ornatus’, Rhetorica 6: 275–90.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (2002) ‘Commenting on commentaries: a pragmatic postscript’, in Gibson, R. K. and Kraus, C. S., eds., The classical commentary: histories, practices, theory, Leiden: 403–21.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (2011) Roman readings: Roman response to Greek literature from Plautus to Statius and Quintilian, Berlin.Google Scholar

Faranda, R. and Pecchiura, P. (1979) Marco Fabio Quintiliano. L’istituzione oratoria, 2nd edn, 2 vols., Turin.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. (1991) Vergil’s Georgics and the traditions of ancient epic: the art of allusion in literary history, Oxford.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. (1997) ‘The Virgilian intertext’, in Martindale, C., ed., The Cambridge companion to Virgil, Cambridge: 222–38.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. (2005) ‘Intention and intertext’, Phoenix 59: 98–111.Google Scholar

Fedeli, P. (1984) ‘Arte allusiva’, in della Corte, F., ed., Enciclopedia virgiliana, Rome: i, 346–7.Google Scholar

Feldherr, A. (2013) ‘Free spirits: Sallust and the citation of Catiline’, AJP 134: 49–66.Google Scholar

Felgentreu, F. (2015) ‘Κτῆμα ἐς ἀεί. Überlegungen zu Eigentum und Historiographie in den Plinius-Briefen’, in Almazova, N., Egorova, S., Keyer, D. and Verlinsky, A., eds., XAPAKTHP ARETAΣ. Donum natalicium Bernardo Seidensticker ab amicis oblatum. Hyperboreus 20, St Petersburg and Munich: 317–30.Google Scholar

Fernández López, J. (2007) ‘Quintilian as rhetorician and teacher’, in Dominik and Hall 2007: 307–22.Google Scholar

Finkelpearl, E. D. (1998) Metamorphosis of language in Apuleius: a study of allusion in the novel, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, W. (2007) ‘The letter’s the thing (in Pliny, Book 7)’, in Morello, R. and Morrison, A. D., eds., Ancient letters: classical and late antique epistolography, Oxford: 191–210.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, W. (2016) Variety: the life of a Roman concept, Chicago.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, W. (2018) ‘Pliny and Martial: dupes and non-dupes in the early Empire’, in König and Whitton 2018b: 108–25.Google Scholar

Fögen, T. (2017) ‘Gattungsvielfalt in den Briefen des Jüngeren Plinius: Episteln im Spannungsfeld von ethischer Unterweisung und literarischer Pluridimensionalität’, Gymnasium 124: 21–60.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. (1983) ‘An acrostic in Virgil (Aeneid 7.601–4)?’, CQ 33: 298.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. (1997) ‘On the shoulders of giants: intertextuality and classical studies’, MD 39: 13–34. Reprinted in Fowler, D., Roman constructions: readings in postmodern Latin, Oxford, 2000: 294–308.Google Scholar

Freudenburg, K. (2010) ‘Horatius anceps: persona and self-revelation in satire and song’, in Davis, G., ed., A companion to Horace, Malden, MA: 271–90.Google Scholar

Froesch, H. H. (1968) Ovids Epistulae ex Ponto I–III als Gedichtsammlung, Bonn.Google Scholar

Galand, P., Hallyn, F., Lévy, C. and Verbaal, W., eds. (2010) Quintilien ancien et moderne, Turnhout.Google Scholar

Gallent-Kočevar, H. (1933) ‘Über die Sentenzen des jüngeren Plinius’, Mitteilungen des Vereines klassischer Philologen in Wien 10: 58–62.Google Scholar

Gallia, A. B. (2012) Remembering the Roman republic: culture, politics, and history under the principate, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gamberini, F. (1983) Stylistic theory and practice in the Younger Pliny, Hildesheim.Google Scholar

Gazda, E. K., ed. (2002) The ancient art of emulation: studies in artistic originality and tradition from the present to classical antiquity, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Gazich, R. (1990) ‘Teoria e pratica dell’ “exemplum” in Quintiliano’, in Cova et al. 1990: 61–141.Google Scholar

Gazich, R. (2003) ‘Retorica dell’esemplarità nelle Lettere di Plinio’, in Castagna and Lefèvre 2003: 123–41.Google Scholar

Gellérfi, G. (2013) ‘The Institutes of oratory as inspiration and source for Juvenal’, Graeco-Latina Brunensia 18: 85–93.Google Scholar

Gervais, K. (2017) Statius, Thebaid 2, Oxford.Google Scholar

Gesner, J. M. C. (1738) M. Fabii Quinctiliani De institutione oratoria libri duodecim, 2 vols., Göttingen.Google Scholar

Gesner, J. M. C. (1739) Plinii Caecilii Secundi Epistolarum libri decem. Eiusdem Gratiarum actio sive Panegyricus, Leipzig (with 2nd edn, ed. Ernesti, A. W., 1770).Google Scholar

Geue, T. (2018) ‘Forgetting the Juvenalien in our midst: literary amnesia in the Satires’, in König and Whitton 2018b: 366–84.Google Scholar

Giangrande, G. (1967) ‘Arte allusiva and Alexandrian poetry’, CQ 17: 85–97.Google Scholar

Gianotti, G. F. (1979) ‘Il principe e il retore: classicismo come consenso in età imperiale’, Sigma 12: 67–83.Google Scholar

Gibson, B. J. (2006) Statius, Silvae 5, Oxford.Google Scholar

Gibson, B. (2010) ‘Silius Italicus: a consular historian?’, in Augoustakis 2010: 47–72.Google Scholar

Gibson, R. K. (2003) ‘Pliny and the art of (in)offensive self-praise’, Arethusa 36: 235–54.Google Scholar

Gibson, R. K. (2007) Excess and restraint: Propertius, Horace and Ovid’s Ars Amatoria, London.Google Scholar

Gibson, R. K. (2011a) ‘Elder and better: the Naturalis historia and the Letters of the Younger Pliny’, in Gibson, R. K. and Morello, R., eds., Pliny the Elder: themes and contexts, Leiden: 187–206.Google Scholar

Gibson, R. K. (2011b) ‘<Clarus> confirmed? Pliny, Epistles 1.1 and Sidonius Apollinaris’, CQ 61: 655–9.Google Scholar

Gibson, R. K. (2013a) ‘Pliny and the letters of Sidonius: from Constantius and Clarus to Firminus and Fuscus’, Arethusa 46: 333–55.Google Scholar

Gibson, R. K. (2013b) ‘Starting with the index in Pliny’, in Jansen, L., ed., Paratextuality and the reader in Roman literature and culture, Cambridge: 33–55.Google Scholar

Gibson, R. K. (2013c) ‘Reading Sidonius by the book’, in van Waarden, J. and Kelly, G., eds., New approaches to Sidonius Apollinaris, Leuven: 195–219.Google Scholar

Gibson, R. K. (2015) ‘Not dark yet: reading to the end of the nine-book collection’, in Marchesi 2015b: 185–222.Google Scholar

Gibson, R. K. (2018) ‘Pliny and Plutarch’s practical ethics: a newly rediscovered dialogue’, in König and Whitton 2018b: 402–21.Google Scholar

Gibson, R. K. (forthcoming) Pliny the Younger. Epistles book VI, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gibson, R. K. and Morello, R. (2012) Reading the letters of Pliny the Younger: an introduction, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gibson, R. K. and Steel, C. (2010) ‘The indistinct literary careers of Cicero and Pliny the Younger’, in Hardie, P. and Moore, H., eds., Classical literary careers and their reception, Cambridge: 118–37.Google Scholar

Gibson, R. K. and Whitton, C. L., eds. (2016) The Epistles of Pliny. Oxford readings in classical studies, Oxford.Google Scholar

Gierig, G. E. (1796) C. Plinii Caecilii Secundi Panegyricus Traiano dictus. Recensuit notisque illustravit G. E. G., Leipzig.Google Scholar

Gierig, G. E. (1800–2) C. Plinii Caecilii Secundi Epistolarum libri decem, 2 vols., Leipzig.Google Scholar

Gildenhard, I. (2007a) Paideia Romana: Cicero’s Tusculan disputations. CCJ Supplement 30, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gildenhard, I. (2007b) ‘Virgil vs. Ennius, or: the undoing of the annalist’, in Fitzgerald, W. and Gowers, E., eds., Ennius perennis: the Annals and beyond. CCJ Supplement 31, Cambridge: 73–102.Google Scholar

Gildersleeve, B. L. and Lodge, G. (1958) Gildersleeve’s Latin grammar, 3rd edn, London.Google Scholar

Gleason, M. (1994) Making men: sophists and self-presentation in ancient Rome, Princeton.Google Scholar

Glen, L. (2016) ‘The announcement: Tacitus’ Dialogus de oratoribus as the prelude to his Annales’, unpublished MA dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar

Glücklich, H.-J. (2003) Die Briefe Plinius des Jüngeren im Unterricht, Göttingen.Google Scholar

Gnilka, C. (1973) ‘Trauer und Trost in Plinius’ Briefen’, SO 49: 105–25.CrossRef Google Scholar

Goldberg, S. M. (1999) ‘Appreciating Aper: the defence of modernity in Tacitus’ Dialogus de oratoribus’, CQ 49: 224–37.Google Scholar

Goldberg, S. M. (2009) ‘The faces of eloquence: the Dialogus de oratoribus’, in Woodman 2009c: 73–84.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. (2017) ‘The limits of the case study: exemplarity and the reception of classical literature’, New Literary History 48: 415–35.Google Scholar

Goold, G. P. (1964) Review of Mynors 1963, Phoenix 18: 320–8.Google Scholar

Gowers, E. (1993) The loaded table. Representations of food in Roman literature, Oxford.Google Scholar

Gowers, E. (2012) Horace. Satires book I, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gowing, A. (2005) Empire and memory: the representation of the Roman republic in imperial culture, Cambridge.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gowing, A. (2013) ‘Tully’s boat: responses to Cicero in the imperial period’, in Steel, C., ed., The Cambridge companion to Cicero, Cambridge: 233–50.Google Scholar

Graff, R. (2001) ‘Reading and the “written style” in Aristotle’s Rhetoric’, Rhetoric Society Quarterly 31: 19–44.Google Scholar

Grant, R. (1948) ‘Pliny and the Christians’, Harvard Theological Review 41: 273–4.Google Scholar

Greene, T. M. (1982) The light in Troy: imitation and discovery in Renaissance poetry, New Haven.Google Scholar

Griffin, J. (1982) ‘The creation of characters in the Aeneid’, in Gold, B. K., ed., Literary and artistic patronage in ancient Rome, Austin, TX: 118–34.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. T. (1999) ‘Pliny and Tacitus’, SCI 18: 139–58. Reprinted in Gibson and Whitton 2016: 355–77.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. T. (2007) ‘The Younger Pliny’s debt to moral philosophy’, HSCP 103: 451–81.Google Scholar

Gruenwald, E. (1883) Quae ratio intercedere videatur inter Quintiliani institutionem oratoriam et Taciti dialogum, Berlin.Google Scholar

Gualandri, I. (1979) Furtiva lectio: studi su Sidonio Apollinare, Milan.Google Scholar

Gudeman, A. (1914) P. Cornelii Taciti Dialogus de oratoribus. Mit Prolegomena etc., 2nd edn, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Guillemin, A-M. (1929) Pline et la vie littéraire de son temps, Paris.Google Scholar

Guillemin, A-M. (1946) ‘La culture de Pline le Jeune’, in Mélanges dédiés à la mémoire de Félix Grat, Paris: i, 77–88.Google Scholar

Guillemin, A-M. (1953–62) Pline le Jeune. Lettres I–IX, 3 vols., 2nd edn, Paris.Google Scholar

Gunderson, E. (1997) ‘Catullus, Pliny, and love-letters’, TAPA 127: 201–31.Google Scholar

Gunderson, E. (2009) ‘The rhetoric of rhetorical theory’, in Gunderson, E., ed., The Cambridge companion to ancient rhetoric, Cambridge: 109–25.Google Scholar

Güngerich, R. (1948) ‘Tutilius, 1’, RE ii.7: 1613–14.Google Scholar

Güngerich, R. (1951) ‘Der Dialogus des Tacitus und Quintilians Institutio oratoria’, CP 46: 159–64. Reprinted in Pöschl, V., ed., Tacitus, Darmstadt 1969: 349–60.Google Scholar

Güngerich, R. (1955) Review of Barwick 1954 and E. Paratore, Ancora del ‘Dialogus de oratoribus’ (1954), Gnomon 27: 439–43.Google Scholar

Güngerich, R. (1956) ‘Tacitus’ Dialogus und der Panegyricus des Plinius’, Festschrift Bruno Snell, Munich: 145–52.Google Scholar

Güngerich, R. (1980) Kommentar zum Dialogus des Tacitus (completed by Heubner, H.), Göttingen.Google Scholar

Gurd, S. A. (2012) Work in progress: literary revision as social performance in ancient Rome, Oxford.Google Scholar

Gutzwiller, K. (2017) ‘Contests of style and uses of the middle in canon making’, in Cojannot-Le Blanc, M., Pouzadoux, C. and Prioux, E., eds., L’Héroïque et le champêtre. Volume II. Appropriation et déconstruction des théories stylistiques dans la pratique des artistes et dans les modalités d’exposition des œuvres, Paris: 15–31.Google Scholar

Håkanson, L. (1986) ‘Die quintilianischen Deklamationen in der neueren Forschung’, ANRW ii.32.4: 2272–306.Google Scholar

Håkanson, L. (2014) Unveröffentlichte Schriften. Band 1. Studien zu den pseudoquintilianischen ‘Declamationes maiores’, ed. Santorelli, B., Berlin.Google Scholar

Halliwell, S. (2002) The aesthetics of mimesis: ancient texts and modern problems, Princeton.Google Scholar

Halm, C. (Halm, K. F.) (1868–9) M. Fabi Quintiliani Institutionis oratoriae libri duodecim, 2 vols., Leipzig.Google Scholar

Hanaghan, M. (2017) ‘Micro allusions to Pliny and Virgil in Sidonius’s programmatic epistles’, IJCT 24: 249–61.Google Scholar

Hardie, A. (1997–8) ‘Juvenal, Domitian, and the accession of Hadrian (Satire 4)’, BICS 42: 117–44.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. (1989) ‘Flavian epicists on Virgil’s epic technique’, Ramus 18: 3–30.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. (1994) Virgil. Aeneid book IX, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. (2004) ‘Ovidian middles’, in Kyriakidis, S. and de Martino, F., eds., Middles in Latin poetry, Bari: 151–82.Google Scholar

Harries, J. D. (2013) ‘The senatus consultum Silanianum: court decisions and judicial severity in the early Roman Empire’, in du Plessis, P., ed., New frontiers: law and society in the Roman world, Edinburgh: 51–70.Google Scholar

Harrill, J. A. (2017) ‘“Without lies or deception”: oracular claims to truth in the Epistle to Titus’, New Testament Studies 63: 451–72.Google Scholar

Harris, W. V. (1980) ‘Towards a study of the Roman slave trade’, MAAR 36: 117–40. Reprinted in Harris, W. V., Rome’s imperial economy: twelve essays, Oxford, 2011: 57–87.Google Scholar

Harrison, E. L. (1981) ‘Vergil and the Homeric tradition’, PLLS 3: 209–25.Google Scholar

Harrison, S. J. (2013) Framing the Ass: literary form in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses, Oxford.Google Scholar

Haß, C. D. and Noller, E. M., eds. (2015) Was bedeutet Ordnung – was ordnet Bedeutung?, Berlin.Google Scholar

Haß-von Reitzenstein, U. (1970) Beiträge zur gattungsgeschichtlichen Interpretation des ‘Dialogus de oratoribus’, Cologne.Google Scholar

Häußler, R. (1986) ‘Aktuelle Probleme der Dialogus-Rezeption: Echtheitserweise und Lückenumfang. Ein Zwischenbilanz’, Philologus 130: 69–95.Google Scholar

Häußler, R. (1987) ‘Abermals: Plinius’ Eberjagden’, Philologus 131: 82–5.Google Scholar

Haynes, H. (forthcoming) ‘Tyranny, self and genre in Pliny’s Letter 5.8’.Google Scholar

Heath, M. (1999) ‘Longinus, On sublimity’, PCPS 45: 43–74.Google Scholar

Hedrick, C. W. Jr. (2000) History and silence: purge and rehabilitation of memory in late antiquity, Austin, TX.Google Scholar

Heldmann, K. (1980) ‘Dekadenz und literarischer Fortschritt bei Quintilian und bei Tacitus. Ein Beitrag zum römischen Klassizismus’, Poetica 12: 1–12.Google Scholar

Heldmann, K. (1982) Antike Theorien über Entwicklung und Verfall der Redekunst, Munich.Google Scholar

Helm, R. (1940) ‘Beiträge zur Quellenforschung bei Valerius Maximus’, RhM 89: 241–73.Google Scholar

Henderson, Jeffrey (1972) ‘The lekythos and Frogs 1200–1248’, HSCP 76: 133–43.Google Scholar

Henderson, John (1998) Fighting for Rome: poets and Caesars, history and civil war, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Henderson, John (2001a) ‘On Pliny on Martial on Pliny on anon … (Epistles 3.21/Epigrams 10.19)’, Ramus 30: 57–88.Google Scholar

Henderson, John (2001b) ‘Going to the dogs/Grattius <&> the Augustan subject’, PCPS 47: 1–22.Google Scholar

Henderson, John (2002a) Pliny’s statue: the Letters, self-portraiture, and classical art, Exeter.Google Scholar

Henderson, John (2002b) ‘Knowing someone through their books: Pliny on Uncle Pliny (Epistles 3.5)’, CP 97: 256–84. Reprinted in Gibson and Whitton 2016: 378–416.Google Scholar

Henderson, John (2003) ‘Portrait of the artist as a figure of style: P.L.I.N.Y’s Letters’, Arethusa 36: 115–25.Google Scholar

Herescu, N. I. (1956) ‘Le mode de composition des écrivains (“dictare”)’, REL 34: 132–46.Google Scholar

Herrmann, L. (1955) ‘Quintilien et le Dialogue des orateurs’, Latomus 14: 349–69.Google Scholar

Herrmann, L. (1965) ‘Encore le “Dialogue des orateurs” et Quintilien’, Latomus 24: 845–57.Google Scholar

Hershkowitz, D. (1995) ‘Pliny the poet’, G&R 42: 168–81.Google Scholar

Heubeck, A., West, S. and Hainsworth, J. B. (1988) A commentary on Homer’s Odyssey. Volume I: introduction and books I–VIII, Oxford.Google Scholar

Hidber, T. (1996) Das klassizistische Manifest des Dionys von Halikarnass, Stuttgart. Republished Berlin, 2012.Google Scholar

Hillgruber, M. (1999) Die pseudoplutarchische Schrift De Homero. Teil 2. Kommentar zu den Kapiteln 74–218, Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Hindermann, J. (2011) ‘Verliebte Delphine, schwimmende Inseln und versiegende Quellen beim älteren und jüngeren Plinius: mirabilia und ihre Erzählpotenz (epp. 4,30; 8,20; 9,33)’, Gymnasium 118: 345–54.Google Scholar

Hinds, S. (1987) The metamorphosis of Persephone: Ovid and the self-conscious Muse, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hinds, S. (1993) ‘Medea in Ovid: scenes from the life of an intertextual heroine’, MD 30: 9–47.Google Scholar

Hinds, S. (1998) Allusion and intertext: dynamics of appropriation in Roman poetry, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hinds, S. (2010) ‘Between formalism and historicism’, in Barchiesi, A. and Scheidel, W., eds., The Oxford handbook of Roman studies, Oxford: 369–85.Google Scholar

Hine, H. (2005) ‘Poetic influence on prose: the case of the younger Seneca’, in Reinhardt, Lapidge and Adams 2005: 211–37.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hine, H. (2016) ‘Philosophi and philosophy: from Cicero to Apuleius’, in Williams, G. D. and Volk, K., eds., Roman reflections: studies in Latin philosophy, Oxford: 13–29.Google Scholar

Hirschberg, T. (1992) ‘Zu Quintilian, inst. 1 praef. 3’, Hermes 120: 249–50.Google Scholar

Hoffer, S. E. (1999) The anxieties of Pliny the Younger, Atlanta.Google Scholar

Hoffer, S. E. (2016) ‘Models of senators and emperors: Regulus, the bad senator (Epistles 1.5)’, in Gibson and Whitton 2016: 289–331.Google Scholar

Holcomb, C. (2001) ‘“The crown of all our study”: improvisation in Quintilian’s Institutio oratoria’, Rhetoric Society Quarterly 31: 53–72.Google Scholar

Holford-Strevens, L. (2001) ‘Getting away with murder: the literary and forensic fortune of two Roman exempla’, IJCT 7: 489–514.Google Scholar

Holford-Strevens, L. (2003) Aulus Gellius: an Antonine scholar and his achievements, rev. edn, Oxford.Google Scholar

Holford-Strevens, L. and Vardi, A., eds. (2004) The worlds of Aulus Gellius, Oxford.Google Scholar

Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (1996) ‘Exempla und mos maiorum: Überlegungen zum “kollektiven Gedächtnis” der Nobilität’, in Gehrke, H-J. and Möller, A., eds., Vergangenheit und Lebenswelt: Soziale Kommunikation, Traditionsbildung und historisches Bewußtsein, Tübingen: 301–38. Reprinted with addenda in Hölkeskamp, K.-J., Senatus populusque Romanus: Die politische Kultur der Republik – Dimensionen und Deutungen, Stuttgart, 2004: 169–98.Google Scholar

Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2003) ‘Ikonen der virtus. Exemplarische Helden(-taten) im monumentalen Gedächtnis der römischen Republik’, in Barzanò, A., Bearzot, C. and Landucci Gattinoni, F., eds., Modelli eroici dall’antichità alla cultura europea, Rome: 213–37.Google Scholar

Hooley, D. M. (1997) The knotted thong: structures of mimesis in Persius, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. (1979) ‘Doctus sermones utriusque linguae?’, EMC 23: 79–95.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. (1993) ‘Allusion in the Georgics’ (review of Farrell 1991), CR 43: 44–7.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. (1996) Review of Citroni 1995, Vergilius 42: 157–60.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. (1998) Virgil, Aeneid 2. A commentary, Leiden.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. (2003) Virgil, Aeneid 11. A commentary, Leiden.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. (2016) The epic distilled: studies in the composition of the Aeneid, Oxford.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. (2006) The shadow of Callimachus: studies in the reception of Hellenistic poetry at Rome, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. (2009a) Critical moments in classical literature: studies in the ancient view of literature and its uses, Cambridge.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. (2009b) ‘The Trojan oration of Dio Chrysostom and ancient Homeric criticism’, in Grethlein, J. and Rengakos, A., eds., Narratology and interpretation: the content of narrative form in ancient literature, Berlin: 43–61.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. (2010) ‘Rhythmical language and poetic citation in Greek narrative texts’, in Bastianini, G. and Casanova, A., eds., I papiri del romanzo antico, Florence: 233–45.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. (2012) Plato and the traditions of ancient literature: the silent stream, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. (2014) Hesiodic voices: studies in the ancient reception of Hesiod’s Works and Days, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. (2016) ‘The Hippias minor and the traditions of Homeric criticism’, CCJ 62: 85–107.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. (forthcoming) ‘Callimachus and the description of rhetorical style’, in Perale, M. et al., eds., Hellenistic poetry before Callimachus, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, G. O. (1993) Latin literature from Seneca to Juvenal: a critical study, Oxford.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, G. O. (1998) Cicero’s correspondence: a literary study, Oxford.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, G. O. (2011) ‘Politics and the sublime in the Panegyricus’, in Roche 2011: 125–41.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, G. O. (2013) Greek to Latin: frameworks and contexts for intertextuality, Oxford.Google Scholar

Innes, D. C. (2007) ‘Aristotle: the written and the performative styles’, in Mirhady, D. C., ed., Influences on peripatetic rhetoric, Leiden: 151–68.Google Scholar

Innes, D. C. (2011) ‘The Panegyricus and rhetorical theory’, in Roche 2011: 67–84.Google Scholar

Iordache, R. (1990) ‘Algunas influencias de Cicerón y Quintiliano en el estilo de Plinio el Joven’, Helmantica 41: 189–99.Google Scholar

Irwin, W. (2004) ‘Against intertextuality’, Philosophy and Literature 28: 227–42.Google Scholar

Janka, M. (2015) ‘Plinius und die Poesie. Von der Freizeitdichtung zur Literaturtheorie’, Gymnasium 122: 597–618.Google Scholar

Janson, T. (1964) Latin prose prefaces: studies in literary conventions, Stockholm.Google Scholar

Jeffreys, R. L. (1987) ‘The infirmitas of Messalla Corvinus’, Latomus 46: 196–8.Google Scholar

Jocelyn, H. D. (1979) ‘Vergilius cacozelus (Donatus, Vita Vergilii 44)’, PLLS 2: 67–142.Google Scholar

Johnson, W. A. (2000) ‘Toward a sociology of reading in classical antiquity’, AJP 121: 593–627.Google Scholar

Johnson, W. A. (2010) Readers and reading culture in the High Roman Empire, Oxford.Google Scholar

Johnson, W. A. (2013) ‘Pliny Epistle 9.36 and Demosthenes’ cave’, CW 106: 665–8.Google Scholar

Johnson, W. A. and Parker, H. N. (2009) Ancient literacies: the culture of reading in Greece and Rome, Oxford.Google Scholar

Jones, C. P. (1968) ‘A new commentary on the letters of Pliny’, Phoenix 22: 111–42.Google Scholar

Jones, C. P. (1969) ‘Julius Naso and Julius Secundus’, HSCP 72: 279–88.Google Scholar

Jones, F. (1988) ‘Notes on Quintilian and [Quintilian]’, CQ 38: 568–9.Google Scholar

de Jonge, C. (2012) ‘Dionysius and Longinus on the sublime: rhetoric and religious language’, AJP 133: 271–300.Google Scholar

Joseph, T. A. (2012) Tacitus the epic successor. Virgil, Lucan, and the narrative of civil war in the Histories, Leiden.Google Scholar

Jouanno, C. (2005) ‘Thersite, une figure de la démesure?’, Kentron 21: 181–223.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kallendorf, C. W. (1994) ‘Brevitas’, in Ueding 1994: 53–60.Google Scholar

Kasten, H. (1984) Gaius Plinius Caecilius Secundus: Briefe, 2 vols., 4th edn, Munich.Google Scholar

Kaster, R. A. (1995) C. Suetonius Tranquillus: De grammaticis et rhetoribus, Oxford.Google Scholar

Kaster, R. A. (1998) ‘Becoming “CICERO”’, in Knox, P. E. and Foss, C., eds., Style and tradition: studies in honor of Wendell Clausen, Stuttgart: 248–63.Google Scholar

Kaster, R. A. (2005) Emotion, restraint and community in ancient Rome, Oxford.Google Scholar

Keeline, T. (2013) ‘The literary and stylistic qualities of a Plinian letter: a commentary on Plin. Ep. 7.9’, HSCP 107: 189–224.Google Scholar

Keeline, T. (2018a) The reception of Cicero in the early Roman Empire: the rhetorical schoolroom and the creation of a cultural legend, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Keeline, T. (2018b) ‘Model or anti-model? Pliny on Uncle Pliny’, TAPA 148: 173–203.Google Scholar

Keil, H. (1870) C. Plini Caecili Secundi Epistularum libri novem etc., Leipzig.Google Scholar

Kelly, G. (2008) Ammianus Marcellinus: the allusive historian, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kelly, G. (2018) ‘From Martial to Juvenal (Epigrams 12.18)’, in König and Whitton 2018b: 160–79.Google Scholar

Kelly, J. M. (1976) Studies in the civil judicature of the Roman republic, Oxford.Google Scholar

Kennedy, G. A. (1957) ‘The ancient dispute over rhetoric in Homer’, AJP 78: 23–35.Google Scholar

Kennedy, G. A. (1969) Quintilian, New York.Google Scholar

Kennedy, G. A. (1998) ‘Quintilian on retirement’, in Albaladejo, del Rio and Caballero 1998: i, 153–8.Google Scholar

Kennedy, G. A. (2007) Aristotle. The art of rhetoric. A theory of civic discourse, 2nd edn, Oxford.Google Scholar

Kennedy, G. A. (2013) Quintilian: a Roman educator and his quest for the perfect orator (rev. edn of Kennedy 1969), sine loco.Google Scholar

Kenney, E. J. (1958) ‘Nequitiae poeta’, in Herescu, N. I., ed., Ovidiana: recherches sur Ovide (Paris) 201–9.Google Scholar

Kenney, E. J. (1979) ‘Iudicium transferendi: Virgil, Aeneid 2.469–505 and its antecedents’, in West and Woodman 1979b: 103–20.Google Scholar

Kenney, E. J. (1982) ‘Books and readers in the Roman world’, in Kenney, E. J. and Clausen, W. V., eds., The Cambridge history of classical literature. II. Latin literature (Cambridge) 3–32.Google Scholar

Ker, J. (2004) ‘Nocturnal writers in imperial Rome: the culture of lucubratio’, CP 99: 209–42.Google Scholar

Kerr, R. A. (2002) ‘Criticism in Quintilian’, unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Glasgow.Google Scholar

Kirby, J. T. (1990) The rhetoric of Cicero’s Pro Cluentio, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Kirsch, D. (2010) ‘Thinking with external representations’, AI & Society 25: 441–54.Google Scholar

Klodt, C. (2012) ‘Patrem mira similitudine exscripserat. Plinius’ Nachruf auf eine perfekte Tochter (epist. 5, 16)’, Gymnasium 119: 23–61.Google Scholar

Klodt, C. (2015) ‘Das Grabmal des Verginius Rufus (Plinius, epist. 2,1, 6,10 und 9,19)’, Gymnasium 122: 339–87.Google Scholar

Köhnken, A. (1973) ‘Das Problem der Ironie bei Tacitus’, MH 30: 32–50.Google Scholar

König, A. R. and Whitton, C. L. (2018a) ‘Introduction’, in König and Whitton 2018b: 1–34.Google Scholar

König, A. R. and Whitton, C. L., eds. (2018b) Roman literature under Nerva, Trajan and Hadrian: literary interactions, ad 96–138, Cambridge.Google Scholar

König, J. (2007) ‘Fragmentation and coherence in Plutarch’s Sympotic questions’, in König, J. and Whitmarsh, T., eds., Ordering knowledge in the Roman Empire, Cambridge: 43–68.Google Scholar

Kousser, R. (2015) ‘Adapting Greek art’, in Borg, B. E., ed., A companion to Roman art, Malden, MA: 114–29.Google Scholar

Kragelund, P. (2012) ‘Tacitus, Dio, and the “sophist” Maternus’, Historia 61: 495–506.Google Scholar

Krasser, H. (1993) ‘extremos pudeat rediisse – Plinius im Wettstreit mit der Vergangenheit. Zu Vergilzitaten beim jüngeren Plinius’, Antike und Abendland 39: 144–54.Google Scholar

Krauss, R. M. (1998) ‘Why do we gesture when we speak?’, Current Directions in Psychological Science 7: 54–9.Google Scholar

Krebs, C. B. (2006) ‘Leonides Laco quidem simile apud Thermopylas fecit: Cato and Herodotus’, BICS 49: 93–103.Google Scholar

Krebs, C. B. (2016) ‘Thucydides in Gaul: the siege of Plataea as Caesar’s model for his siege of Avaricum’, Histos 10: 1–14.Google Scholar

Krevans, N. (2011) ‘Callimachus’ philology’, in Acosta-Hughes, Lehnus and Stephens 2011: 118–33.Google Scholar

Kroh, K. (2015) ‘Der laute und der leise Plinius. Vom Umgang mit exemplarischen Ordnungen in epist. 3,1 und 3,5’, in Haß and Noller 2015: 71–96.Google Scholar

Kroll, W. (1924) Studien zum Verständnis der römischen Literatur, Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Krostenko, B. A. (2001) Cicero, Catullus and the language of social performance, Chicago.Google Scholar

Kühn, W. (1985) Plinius der Jüngere. Panegyrikus: Lobrede auf den Kaiser Trajan, Darmstadt (with 2nd edn, 2008).Google Scholar

Kühner, R. and Stegmann, C. (1912) Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache. Zweiter Teil: Satzlehre, 2nd edn, 2 vols., Hanover.Google Scholar

Kunkel, W. (1967) Herkunft und soziale Stellung der römischen Juristen, 2nd edn, Weimar.Google Scholar

Kunst, C. (1917) ‘De Aeschine Rhodi exulante’, WS 39: 167–70.Google Scholar

Labate, M. (1984) L’arte di farsi amare: modelli culturali e progetto didascalico nell’elegia ovidiana, Pisa.Google Scholar

La Bua, G. (2014) ‘Cicero’s Pro Milone and the “Demosthenic” style: De optimo genere oratorum 10’, G&R 61: 29–37.Google Scholar

Lana, I. (1951) Quintiliano, il ‘sublime’ e gli ‘esercizi preparatori’ di Elio Teone, Turin.Google Scholar

Lana, I. (1973) La teorizzazione della collaborazione degli intellettuali con il potere politico in Quintiliano, Institutio oratoria, libro XII, Turin.Google Scholar

Lana, I. (1974) ‘L’ultimo libro dell’Institutio oratoria di Quintiliano: la fondazione teoretica della collaborazione dell’oratore con il principe’, Hispania Romana: colloquio italo-spagnolo, Rome: 149–65.Google Scholar

Lange, A. G. (1811) ‘Dialogus de oratoribus Tacito vindicatus’, in Beck, C. D., ed., Acta seminarii regii et societatis philologicae Lipsiensis. Vol. I, Leipzig: 77–88. Reprinted in Lange, A. G. (ed. Jacob, K.), Vermischte Schriften und Reden, Leipzig, 1832: 3–14.Google Scholar

Langlands, R. (2011) ‘Roman exempla and situation ethics: Valerius Maximus and Cicero de Officiis’, JRS 101: 1–23.Google Scholar

Langlands, R. (2014) ‘Pliny’s “role models of both sexes”: gender and exemplarity in the Letters’, Eugesta 4: 214–37.Google Scholar

Langlands, R. (2018) ‘Extratextuality: literary interactions with oral culture and exemplary ethics’, in König and Whitton 2018b: 330–46.Google Scholar

Lanham, R. A. (1983) The electronic word: democracy, technology, and the arts, Chicago.Google Scholar

La Penna, A. (2003) ‘Quintiliano, l’impero, le istituzioni’, in Uglione, R., ed., Atti del convegno nazionale di studi ‘Intellettuali e potere nel mondo antico’, Alessandria: 139–63.Google Scholar

Last, D. M. and Ogilvie, R. M. (1958) ‘Claudius and Livy’, Latomus 17: 476–87.Google Scholar

Lauletta, M. (1998) L’intreccio degli stili in Tacito: intertestualità prosa-poesia nella letteratura storiografica, Naples.Google Scholar

Lausberg, H. (1998) Handbook of literary rhetoric (transl./ed. Bliss, M. T. et al.), Leiden.Google Scholar

Lavan, M. (2018) ‘Pliny Epistles 10 and imperial correspondence: the Empire of letters’, in König and Whitton 2018b: 280–301.Google Scholar

Lawrence, S. J. (2015) ‘Dead on time: Valerius Maximus 9.13 and Stoicism’, Antichthon 49: 135–55.Google Scholar

Leach, E. W. (2003) ‘Otium as luxuria: economy of status in the Younger Pliny’s Letters’, Arethusa 36: 147–65.Google Scholar

Lee, A. G. (1958–9) ‘The date of Lygdamus and his relationship to Ovid’, PCPS 185: 15–23.Google Scholar

Lee, A. G. (1971) Allusion, parody and imitation. St John’s College Cambridge lecture, Hull.Google Scholar

Leeman, A. D. (1963) Orationis ratio: the stylistic theories and practice of the Roman orators, historians and philosophers, 2 vols., Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Leeman, A. D. and Pinkster, H. (1981) M. Tullius Cicero, De oratore libri III. Band I: Buch 1, 1–165, Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Leeman, A. D., Pinkster, H. and Nelson, L. W. (1985) M. Tullius Cicero, De oratore libri III. Band II: Buch I, 166–265; Buch II, 1–98, Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Leeman, A. D., Pinkster, H. and Rabbie, E. (1989) M. Tullius Cicero, De oratore libri III. Band III: Buch II, 99–290, Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Leeman, A. D., Pinkster, H. and Wisse, J. (1996) M. Tullius Cicero, De oratore libri III. Band IV: Buch II, 291–367; Buch III, 1–95, Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Lefèvre, E. (1978) ‘Plinius-Studien II: Diana und Minerva. Die beiden Jagd-Billette an Tacitus (1,6; 9,10)’, Gymnasium 85: 37–47. Reprised in Lefèvre 2009: 246–50.Google Scholar

Lefèvre, E. (1989) ‘Plinius-Studien V: Vom Römertum zum Ästhetizismus: Die Würdigungen des Älteren Plinius (3,5), Silius Italicus (3,7) und Martial (3,21)’, Gymnasium 96: 113–28. Revised version in Lefèvre 2009: 123–6, 142–5 and 157–9.Google Scholar

Lefèvre, E. (1996) ‘Plinius-Studien VII: Cicero das unerreichbare Vorbild (1,2; 3,15; 4,8; 7,4; 9,2)’, Gymnasium 103: 333–53. Reprised in Lefèvre 2009: 111–22.Google Scholar

Lefèvre, E. (2003) ‘Plinius’ Klage um die verlorengegangene Würde des Senats (3, 20; 4, 25)’, in Castagna and Lefèvre 2003: 189–200. Reprised in Lefèvre 2009: 93–101.Google Scholar

Lefèvre, E. (2009) Vom Römertum zum Ästhetizismus: Studien zu den Briefen des jüngeren Plinius, Berlin.Google Scholar

Leigh, M. (2004) ‘Quintilian on the emotions (Institutio oratoria 6 preface and 1–2)’, JRS 94: 122–40.Google Scholar

Lemoine, F. J. (1991) ‘Parental gifts: father–son dedications and dialogues in Roman didactic literature’, ICS 16: 337–66.Google Scholar

Leo, F. (1878) L. Annaei Senecae tragoediae. I. De Senecae tragoediis observationes criticae, Berlin.Google Scholar

Levene, D. S. (1997) ‘God and man in the classical Latin panegyric’, PCPS 43: 66–103.Google Scholar

Levene, D. S. (2010) Livy on the Hannibalic war, Oxford.Google Scholar

Levene, D. S. (2011) ‘Historical allusion and the nature of the historical text’, Histos working papers 2011.01.Google Scholar

Levene, D. S. (2015) ‘Allusions and intertextuality in Livy’s third decade’, in Mineo, B., ed., A companion to Livy, Malden, MA: 205–16.Google Scholar

Lévy, C. (2010) ‘Note sur un aspect de Quintilien lecteur de Cicéron: sceptiques et stoïciens dans l’Institution oratoire’, in Galand et al. 2010: 109–24.Google Scholar

Lewis, J. D. (1879) The letters of the Younger Pliny, London.Google Scholar

Lillo Redonet, F. (2001) Palabras contra el dolor: la consolación filosófica latina de Cicerón a Frontón, Madrid.Google Scholar

Lion, H. (1895) Plinii minoris epistulae quid ad pueros educandos aptum praebeant, Paris.Google Scholar

Locatellus, B. (1493) Quintilianus cum commento, Venice.Google Scholar

Löfstedt, E. (1949) ‘Reminiscence and imitation. Some problems in Latin literature’, Eranos 47: 148–64.Google Scholar

Lorenz, S. (2014) ‘Martial und Quintilian (Epigr. 2.90)’, Gymnasium 121: 45–68.Google Scholar

Lovatt, H. (2010) ‘Interplay: Silius and Statius in the games of Punica 16’, in Augoustakis 2010: 155–76.Google Scholar

Lowry, C. J. (1975) ‘The influence of Quintilian on the historical works of Tacitus’, unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Cincinnati.Google Scholar

Luce, T. J. (1993) ‘Reading and response in Tacitus’ Dialogus’, in Luce, T. J. and Woodman, A. J., eds., Tacitus and the Tacitean tradition, Princeton: 11–38.Google Scholar

Ludolph, M. (1997) Epistolographie und Selbstdarstellung: Untersuchungen zu den ‘Paradebriefen’ Plinius des Jüngeren, Tübingen.Google Scholar

Lyne, Raphael (2016) Memory and intertextuality in Renaissance literature, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1987) Further voices in Vergil’s Aeneid, Oxford.Google Scholar

Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1994) ‘Vergil’s Aeneid: subversion by intertextuality. Catullus 66.39–40 and other examples’, G&R 41: 187–204.Google Scholar

Macrae, D. E. (2015) ‘Invitus invitam: a window allusion in Suetonius’ Titus’, CQ 65: 415–18.Google Scholar

Magie, D. M. (1950) Roman rule in Asia minor. To the end of the third century after Christ, 2 vols., Princeton.Google Scholar

Maguinness, W. S. (1968) Review of Cova 1966, CR 18: 117.Google Scholar

Malloch, S. J. V. (2013) The Annals of Tacitus. Book 11, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Manuwald, G. (2015) Valerius Flaccus. Argonautica book III, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Manuwald, G. and Voigt, A., eds. (2013) Flavian epic interactions, Berlin.Google Scholar

Manzoni, G. E. (1990) ‘Il retore Quintiliano di fronte ai filosofi’, in Cova et al. 1990: 143–72.Google Scholar

Marchesi, I. (2008) The art of Pliny’s letters: a poetics of allusion in the private correspondence, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Marchesi, I. (2013) ‘Silenced intertext: Pliny on Martial on Pliny (on Regulus)’, AJP 134: 101–18.Google Scholar

Marchesi, I. (2015a) ‘The unbalanced dinner between Martial and Pliny: one topos in two genres’, in Devillers 2015: 117–29.Google Scholar

Marchesi, I., ed. (2015b) Pliny the book-maker: betting on posterity in the Epistles, Oxford.Google Scholar

Marchesi, I., (2018) ‘The Regulus connection: displacing Lucan between Martial and Pliny’, in König and Whitton 2018b: 349–65.Google Scholar

Margolin, J.-C. (1994) ‘Copia’, in Ueding 1994: 385–94.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. (2011) ‘Intertextuality and exempla’, Histos working papers 2011.03.Google Scholar

de Marinis, T. (1947) La biblioteca napoletana dei re d’Aragona. Vol. I, Milan.Google Scholar

Martin, R. H. and Woodman, A. J. (1989) Tacitus. Annals IV, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Marvin, M. (2008) The language of the Muses: the dialogue between Greek and Roman sculpture, Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Maselli, G. (1973–4) ‘Sulle idee letterarie di Plinio il Giovane’, Annali della Facoltà di Lingue e Lettere Straniere dell’Università di Bari n.s. 4–5: 137–74.Google Scholar

Maslakov, G. (1978) ‘Tradition and abridgement: a study of the exempla tradition in Valerius Maximus and the Elder Pliny’, unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Macquarie.Google Scholar

Mastrorosa, I. G. (2010) ‘La pratica dell’oratoria giudiziaria nell’alto impero: Quintiliano e Plinio il Giovane’, in Galand et al. 2010: 125–52.Google Scholar

May, J. M. (1990) ‘The monologistic dialogue as a method of literary criticism: Cicero, Brutus 285–289 and Horace, Epistle 2.1.34–39’, Athenaeum 78: 177–80.Google Scholar

Mayer, R. (2001) Tacitus. Dialogus, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Mayer, R. (2010) ‘Ipsa verba: Tacitus’ verbatim quotations’, in Fuhrer, T. and Nelis, D., eds., Acting with words: communication, rhetorical performance and performative acts in Latin literature, Heidelberg: 129–42.Google Scholar

Mayhoff, C. (1897) C. Plini Secundi Naturalis historiae libri XXXVII. Vol. IV: Libri XXIII–XXX, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Mayor, J. E. B. (1872) M. Fabi Quintiliani Institutionis oratoriae liber decimus. Part 1, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Mayor, J. E. B. (1880) Pliny’s Letters book III, London.Google Scholar

Mayor, J. E. B. (1886) Thirteen satires of Juvenal, 4th edn, London.Google Scholar

McCutcheon, M. (2016) ‘A revisionist history of Cicero’s Letters’, Mouseion 13: 35–63.Google Scholar

McDermott, W. C. (1936) ‘The ape in Roman literature’, TAPA 67: 148–67.Google Scholar

McDermott, W. C. and Orentzel, A. E. (1979) ‘Quintilian and Domitian’, Athenaeum 67: 9–26.Google Scholar

McElduff, S. (2013) Roman theories of translation: surpassing the sources, London.Google Scholar

McGill, S. (2005) Virgil recomposed: the mythological and secular centos in antiquity, New York.Google Scholar

McGill, S. (2012) Plagiarism in Latin literature, Cambridge.Google Scholar

McKeown, J. C. (1987) Ovid: Amores: text, prolegomena and commentary. Vol. 1, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Meierotto, J. H. L. (1787) Prog. in Plinii Epist. III, 5. Nullum librum tam malum esse, ut non aliqua parte prodesset, Berlin.Google Scholar

Merrill, E. T. (1919) Selected letters of the Younger Pliny, 2nd edn, London.Google Scholar

Merwald, G. (1964) Die Buchkomposition des jüngeren Plinius (Epistulae I–IX), Erlangen.Google Scholar

Mesk, J. (1911) ‘Zur Quellenanalyse des Plinianischen Panegyricus’, WS 33: 71–100.Google Scholar

Méthy, N. (2002) ‘Les secrets de l’âme humaine. Sur une réminiscence cicéronienne dans la correspondance de Pline le Jeune’, in Defosse, P., ed., Hommages à C. Deroux II, Brussels: 303–14.Google Scholar

Méthy, N. (2004) ‘Lettre d’art et vie sociale: les citations dans la correspondance de Pline le Jeune’, in Nadjo, L. and Gavoille, E., eds., Epistulae antiquae iii, Leuven: 463–76.Google Scholar

Méthy, N. (2007) Les lettres de Pline le Jeune. Une représentation de l’homme, Paris.Google Scholar

Miller, J. F. (1993) ‘Ovidian allusion and the vocabulary of memory’, MD 30: 153–64.Google Scholar

Mommsen, T. (1869) ‘Zur Lebensgeschichte des jüngeren Plinius’, Hermes 3: 31–139. Corrected reprint in Mommsen, T., Gesammelte Schriften iv (ed. O. Hirschfeld), Berlin, 1906: 366–468.Google Scholar

Morawski, C. (1895) De sermone scriptorum Latinorum aetatis quae dicitur argenteae observationes, Lviv. Also in Eos 2: 1–13.Google Scholar

Morello, R. (2003) ‘Pliny and the art of saying nothing’, Arethusa 36: 187–209.Google Scholar

Morello, R. (2015) ‘Pliny book 8: two viewpoints and the pedestrian reader’, in Marchesi 2015a: 144–84.Google Scholar

Moreno Soldevila, R. (2010) Plinio el Joven. Panegírico de Trajano, Madrid.Google Scholar

Morgan, J. and Harrison, S. J. (2008) ‘Intertextuality’, in Whitmarsh, T., ed., The Cambridge companion to the Greek and Roman novel, Cambridge: 218–36.Google Scholar

Morgan, T. (1998a) Literate education in the Hellenistic and Roman worlds, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Morgan, T. (1998b) ‘A good man skilled in politics: Quintilian’s political theory’, in Too, Y. L. and Livingstone, N., eds., Pedagogy and power: rhetorics of classical learning, Cambridge: 245–62.Google Scholar

Morgan, T. (2004) ‘Educational values’, in Holford-Strevens and Vardi 2004: 187–205.Google Scholar

Morgan, T. (2007) Popular morality in the early Roman Empire, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Mratschek, S. (2017) ‘The letter collection of Sidonius Apollinaris’, in Sogno, C., Sorin, B. K. and Watts, E. J., eds., Late antique letter collections: a critical introduction and reference guide, Oakland, CA: 309–36.Google Scholar

Mratschek, S. (2018) ‘Images of Domitius Apollinaris in Pliny and Martial: intertextual discourses as aspects of self-definition and differentiation’, in König and Whitton 2018b: 208–32.Google Scholar

Muckelbauer, J. (2003) ‘Imitation and invention in antiquity: an historical-theoretical revision’, Rhetorica 61–88.Google Scholar

Murgia, C. W. (1980) ‘The date of Tacitus’ Dialogus’, HSCP 84: 89–125.Google Scholar

Murgia, C. W. (1985) ‘Pliny’s letters and the Dialogus’, HSCP 89: 171–206. Pages 191–202 reprinted in Gibson and Whitton 2016: 146–58.Google Scholar

Mynors, R. A. B. (1963) C. Plini Caecili Secundi Epistularum libri decem, Oxford (with corrected reprint, 1968).Google Scholar

Nathan, M. J. (2008) ‘An embodied cognition perspective on symbols, gesture, and grounding instruction’, in de Vega, M., Glenberg, A. and Graesser, A., eds., Symbols and embodiment: debates on meaning and cognition, Oxford: 375–96.Google Scholar

Nauta, R. R. (2002) Poetry for patrons: literary communication in the age of Domitian, Leiden.Google Scholar

Neger, M. (2015) ‘Pliny’s Martial and Martial’s Pliny: the intertextual dialogue between the Letters and the Epigrams’, in Devillers 2015: 131–44.Google Scholar

Neuhausen, K. A. (1968) ‘Plinius proximus Tacito: Bemerkungen zu einem Topos der römischen Literaturkritik’, RhM 111: 333–57.Google Scholar

Newlands, C. (2009) ‘Statius’ self-conscious poetics: hexameter on hexameter’, in Dominik, Garthwaite and Roche 2009: 387–404.Google Scholar

Nicholson, J. (1998) ‘The survival of Cicero’s letters’, in Deroux, C., ed., Studies in Latin literature and Roman history IX, Brussels: 63–105.Google Scholar

Niemirska-Pliszczyńska, J. (1955) De elocutione Pliniana in epistularum libris nouem conspicua quaestiones selectae, Lublin.Google Scholar

Nisbet, R. G. M. and Hubbard, M. (1970) A commentary on Horace’s Odes, Book 1, Oxford.Google Scholar

Norden, E. (1915) Die antike Kunstprosa vom VI. Jahrhundert v. Chr. bis in die Zeit der Renaissance, 3rd edn, 2 vols., Leipzig.Google Scholar

Odgers, M. M. (1933) ‘Quintilian’s use of earlier literature’, CP 28: 182–8.Google Scholar

O’Gorman, E. (2006) ‘Intertextuality, time and historical understanding’, in Macfie, A. L., ed., The philosophy of history, London: 102–17.Google Scholar

O’Gorman, E. (2009) ‘Intertextuality and historiography’, in Feldherr, A., ed., A companion to the Roman historians, Cambridge: 231–42.Google Scholar

Oliva, A. (1993) ‘Plinio Ep. V, 8, 11 e Tucidide I, 22, 4’, Athenaeum 81: 279–83.Google Scholar

Orr, M. (2003) Intertextuality: debates and contexts, Cambridge.Google Scholar

O’Sullivan, N. (1992) Alcidamas, Aristophanes, and the beginnings of Greek stylistic theory, Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Otto, A. (1890) Die Sprichwörter und sprichwörtlichen Redensarten der Römer, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Pagán, V. E. (2010) ‘The power of the epistolary preface from Statius to Pliny’, CQ 60: 194–201.Google Scholar

Paoli, U. E. (1960) Plinio. Lettere scelte, 3rd edn, Florence.Google Scholar

Papanghelis, T. D. (1999) ‘Relegens errata litora: Virgil’s reflexive “Odyssey”’, in Kazazis, J. N. and Rengakos, A., eds., Euphrosyne: studies in ancient epic and its legacy in honor of Dimitris N. Maronitis, Stuttgart: 275–90.Google Scholar

Parker, H. N. (2009) ‘Books and reading Latin poetry’, in Johnson and Parker 2009: 186–229.Google Scholar

Pasquali, G. (1942) ‘Arte allusiva’, L’italia che scrive 25: 185–7. Reprinted in Pasquali, G., Pagine stravaganti, Florence, 1968: ii, 275–82.Google Scholar

Pausch, D. (2004) Biographie und Bildungskultur. Personendarstellungen bei Plinius dem Jüngeren, Gellius und Sueton, Berlin.Google Scholar

Peirano, I. (2012) The rhetoric of the Roman fake: Latin pseudepigrapha in context, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Peirano, I. (2013) ‘Non subripiendi causa sed palam mutuandi: intertextuality and literary deviancy between law, rhetoric, and literature in Roman imperial culture’, AJP 134: 83–100.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (2013) ‘Intertextuality, plausibility, and interpretation’, Histos 7: 1–20.Google Scholar

Pelttari, A. (2014) The space that remains: reading Latin poetry in late antiquity, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Pennacini, A., ed. (2001) Quintiliano, Institutio oratoria, 2 vols., Turin.Google Scholar

Penwill, J. L. (2000) ‘Quintilian, Statius and the lost epic of Domitian’, Ramus 29: 60–83.Google Scholar

Pepe, L. (1958) ‘Petronio conosce l’epistolario di Plinio’, GIF 11: 289–94.Google Scholar

Pérez Durà, F. J. (1997) ‘El prohoemium del llibre sisè de la Institutio oratoria. Estudi lingüístic i literari’, in Homenatge a Miquel Dolç, Palma de Mallorca: 125–9.Google Scholar

Pernot, L. (1993) La rhétorique de l’éloge dans le monde gréco-romaine, 2 vols., Paris.Google Scholar

Perry, E. E. (2002) ‘Rhetoric, literary criticism, and the Roman aesthetics of artistic imitation’, in Gazda 2002: 153–71.Google Scholar

Perry, E. E. (2005) The aesthetics of emulation in the visual arts of ancient Rome, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Peter, H. (1901) Der Brief in der römischen Literatur, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Peterson, W. (1891) M. Fabi Quintiliani Institutionis oratoriae liber decimus, Oxford.Google Scholar

Pfeiffer, R. (1968) History of classical scholarship: from the beginnings to the end of the Hellenistic age, Oxford.Google Scholar

Pfister, M. (1985) ‘Konzepte der Intertextualität’, in Broich, U. and Pfister, M., eds., Intertextualität: Formen, Funktionen, anglistische Fallstudien, Tübingen: 1–30.Google Scholar

Pflips, H. (1973) Ciceronachahmung und Ciceroferne des jüngeren Plinius: Ein Kommentar zu den Briefen des Plinius über Repetundenprozesse (epist. 2,11; 2,12; 3,9; 4,9; 5,20; 6,13; 7,6), Bamberg.Google Scholar

Picone, G. (1978) L’eloquenza di Plinio: teoria e prassi, Palermo.Google Scholar

Pomeroy, A. (2010) ‘To Silius through Livy and his predecessors’, in Augoustakis 2010: 27–45.Google Scholar

Porter, W. M. (1990) ‘Cicero’s Pro Archia and the responsibilities of reading’, Rhetorica 8: 137–52.Google Scholar

Posch, S. (1983) ‘Eine Eberjagd mit Gänsefüßchen (Zu Plinius, ep. I, 6)’, in Händel, P. and Meid, W., eds., Festschrift für Robert Muth, Innsbruck: 375–83.Google Scholar

Powell, J. G. F. (1999) ‘Cicero’s translations from Greek’, in Powell, J. G. F., ed., Cicero the philosopher, Oxford: 273–300.Google Scholar

Power, T. J. (2010) ‘Pliny, Letters 5.10 and the literary career of Suetonius’, JRS 100: 140–62.Google Scholar

Preisendanz, C. (1908) ‘De L. Annaei Senecae rhetoris apud philosophum filium auctoritate’, Philologus 67: 68–112.Google Scholar

Press, J. (1966) The fire and the fountain, London.Google Scholar

Prete, S. (1948) Saggi pliniani, Bologna.Google Scholar

Procchi, F. (2010) Plinio il Giovane e la difesa di C. Iulius Bassus: tra norma e persuasione, Pisa.Google Scholar

Pucci, J. (1998) The full-knowing reader: allusion and the power of the reader in the western literary tradition, New Haven.Google Scholar

Quadlbauer, F. (1948) Plinius der Jüngere und der Begriff der erhabenen Rede, Graz.Google Scholar

Quadlbauer, F. (1958) ‘Die genera dicendi bis Plinius d. J.’, WS 71: 55–111.Google Scholar

Radermacher, L. (1907–35) M. Fabi Quintiliani Institutionis oratoriae libri XII, 2 vols., Leipzig. Reprinted with additions by Buchheit, V., Leipzig 1959.Google Scholar

Radermacher, L. (1951) Artium scriptores: Reste der voraristotelischen Rhetorik, Vienna.Google Scholar

Radice, B. (1969) Pliny. Letters and Panegyricus, 2 vols., Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Ratti, S. (2015) ‘Relire le Satyricon: Pline le Jeune et les chrétiens, cibles du roman secret d’un affranchi cultivé’, Anabases 22: 99–145.Google Scholar

Rayment, C. S. (1969) ‘Echoes of the declamations in the dialogues of the Younger Seneca’, CB 45: 61–3.Google Scholar

Rees, R. (2001) ‘To be and not to be: Pliny’s paradoxical Trajan’, BICS 45: 149–68.Google Scholar

Regius, R. (Regio, R.) (1493) ‘Raphaelis Regii in deprauationes oratoriae Quintiliani institutionis annotationes’, in Locatellus 1493.Google Scholar

Reiff, A. (1959) Interpretatio, imitatio, aemulatio: Begriff und Vorstellung literarischer Abhängigkeit bei den Römern, Cologne.Google Scholar

Reinhardt, A. (2015) ‘Reproduktion und Bild. Zur Wiederholung und Vervielfältigung von Reliefbildern und -objekten in römischer Zeit’, unpublished PhD dissertation, Humboldt University, Berlin.Google Scholar

Reinhardt, A. (2018) ‘Delectari varietate: Zur Erklärung der repetitiven Darstellung auf dem “Puteal Tegel”’, in Dietrich, N. and Squire, M. J., eds., Ornament and figure in Graeco-Roman art: rethinking visual ontologies in Classical antiquity, Berlin: 299–326.Google Scholar

Reinhardt, T., Lapidge, M. and Adams, J. N., eds. (2005) Aspects of the language of Latin prose, Oxford.Google Scholar

Reinhardt, T. and Winterbottom, M. (2006) Quintilian. Institutio oratoria Book 2, Oxford.Google Scholar

Reitzenstein, R. (1915) ‘Bemerkungen zu den kleinen Schriften des Tacitus’, Nachrichten von der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Phil.-hist. Kl. aus dem Jahre 1914: 173–276. Reprinted in Reitzenstein, R., Aufsätze zu Tacitus, Darmstadt, 1967: 17–120.Google Scholar

Renehan, R. (1976) ‘A traditional pattern of imitation in Sallust and his sources’, CP 71: 97–105.Google Scholar

Reynolds, L. D. (1983) ‘The Younger Pliny’, in Reynolds, L. D., eds., Texts and transmission: a survey of the Latin classics, Oxford: 316–22. Reprinted in Whitton and Gibson 2016: 482–8.Google Scholar

Riggsby, A. M. (1995) ‘Pliny on Cicero and oratory: self-fashioning in the public eye’, Arethusa 123–35.Google Scholar

Riggsby, A. M. (1998) ‘Self and community in the Younger Pliny’, Arethusa 31: 75–97.Google Scholar

Rimell, V. (2018) ‘I will survive (you): Martial and Tacitus on regime change’, in König and Whitton 2018b: 63–85.Google Scholar

Rivoltella, M. (2014) ‘Ritratto di gentiluomo in posa da cacciatore. Su caccia e rusticatio nell’epistolario pliniano’, in Devillers, O., ed., Neronia IX: la villégiature dans le monde romain de Tibère à Hadrien, Bordeaux: 99–103.Google Scholar

Roberts, M. (1989) The jeweled style: poetry and poetics in late antiquity, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Robinson, D. (1992) ‘Classical theories of translation from Cicero to Aulus Gellius’, TextconText 7.1: 15–55.Google Scholar

Roca Barea, E. (1992) ‘La influencia de Quintiliano en los criterios retóricos de Plinio el Joven’, Helmantica 43: 121–9.Google Scholar

Roca Barea, E. (1998) ‘La influencia de Cicerón y Quintiliano en las ideas sobre el estilo en las cartas de Plinio el Joven’, in Albaladejo, del Rio and Caballero 1998: iii, 1053–8.Google Scholar

Rocchi, S. (2015) ‘Plinius’ Brief 8,18: Eine Überschwemmung des Tiber und des Aniene – Text, Textkritik und Intertextualität’, Gymnasium 122: 389–402.Google Scholar

Roche, P. A. (2009) ‘The ivy and the conquering bay: Quintilian on Domitian and Domitianic policy’, in Dominik, Garthwaite and Roche 2009: 367–86.Google Scholar

Roche, P. A., ed. (2011) Pliny’s praise: the Panegyricus in the Roman world, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Roche, P. A., (2016) ‘Author and authority in the prefaces of Pliny and Quintilian’, in Zissos, A., ed., A companion to the Flavian age of Rome, Malden, MA: 434–59.Google Scholar

Roche, P. A., (2018) ‘Pliny and Suetonius on giving and returning imperial power’, in König and Whitton 2018b: 146–59.Google Scholar

Rolland, E. (1906) De l’influence de Sénèque le Père et des rheteurs sur Sénèque le Philosophe, Ghent.Google Scholar

Roller, M. B. (1998) ‘Pliny’s Catullus: the politics of literary appropriation’, TAPA 128: 265–304. Reprinted in Gibson and Whitton 2016: 246–88.Google Scholar

Roller, M. B. (2018) Models from the past in Roman culture: a world of exempla, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Rosati, G. (1999) ‘Form in motion: weaving the text in the Metamorphoses’, in Hardie, P., Barchiesi, A. and Hinds, S., eds., Ovidian transformations: essays on the Metamorphoses and its reception. PCPS Supplement 23, Cambridge: 240–53. Reprinted in Knox, P. E., ed., Ovid. Oxford readings in classical studies, Oxford: 334–50.Google Scholar

Roth, U. (2016) ‘Liberating the Cena’, CQ 66: 614–34.Google Scholar

Russell, D. A. (1979) ‘De imitatione’, in West and Woodman 1979b: 1–16.Google Scholar

Russell, D. A. (1981) Criticism in antiquity, London.Google Scholar

Russell, D. A. (1990) An anthology of Latin prose, Oxford.Google Scholar

Russell, D. A. (1998) ‘Panegyrists and their teachers’, in Whitby, M., ed., The propaganda of power: the role of panegyric in late antiquity, Leiden: 17–50.Google Scholar

Russell, D. A. (2001) Quintilian. The orator’s education, 5 vols., Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Russell, D. A. (2003) ‘Omisso speciosiore stili genere’, in Reinhardt, Lapidge and Adams 2005: 257–71.Google Scholar

Rutherford, I. (1998) Canons of style in the Antonine age: idea-theory in its literary context, Oxford.Google Scholar

Rutledge, S. (2001) Imperial inquisitions: prosecutors and informants from Tiberius to Domitian, London.Google Scholar

Salomies, O. H. (1982) ‘Quintilian and Vitorius Marcellus’, Arctos 16: 153–8.Google Scholar

Sandys, J. E. (1885) M. Tulli Ciceronis Ad M. Brutum Orator, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Santorelli, B. (2014) ‘Aktualisierung’, in Håkanson 2014: 131–5.Google Scholar

Scarano Ussani, V. (2001) ‘Romanus sapiens e civilis vir. L’oratore al servizio del potere nella teoria di Quintiliano’, Ostraka 10: 147–56.Google Scholar

Scarano Ussani, V. (2003) ‘Romanus sapiens and civilis vir: Quintilian’s theory of the orator acting for the benefit of the imperial power’, in Tellegen-Couperus 2003: 287–302.Google Scholar

Scarano Ussani, V. (2008) Il retore e il potere. Progetto formativo e strategie del consenso nell’Institutio oratoria, Naples.Google Scholar

Scarcia, R. (1967) Plinio il Giovane. Lettere scelte, Rome.Google Scholar

Schanz, M. and Hosius, C. (1935) Geschichte der römischen Litteratur bis zum Gesetzgebungswerk des Kaisers Justinian. Zweiter Teil: Die römische Litteratur in der Zeit der Monarchie bis auf Hadrian, 4th edn, Munich.Google Scholar

Schefferus, I. (Scheffer, J.) (1675) ‘In C. Plinium Caecilium Secundum notae’, in Schefferus, I., Lectionum academicarum liber, Hamburg: 59–109.Google Scholar

Scheidegger-Lämmle, C. (2015) ‘Einige Pendenzen: Weben und Text in der antiken Literatur’, in Harich-Schwarzbauer, H., ed., Weben und Gewebe in der Antike: Materialität – Repräsentation – Episteme, Oxford: 167–208.Google Scholar

Schenk, P. (1999) ‘Formen von Intertextualität im Briefkorpus des jüngeren Plinius’, Philologus 143: 114–34.Google Scholar

Schlegel, C. (2000) ‘Horace and his fathers: Satires 1.4 and 1.6’, AJP 121: 93–119.Google Scholar

Schlegel, C. (2005) Satire and the threat of speech: Horace’s Satires, book 1, Madison, WI.Google Scholar

Schuster, M. (1958) C. Plini Caecili Secundi Epistularum libri novem. Epistularum ad Traianum liber. Panegyricus, 3rd edn (revised by Hanslik, R.), Leipzig.Google Scholar

Schwabe, L. (1909) ‘Fabius, 137. M. Fabius Quintilianus, der Rhetor’, RE i.6: 1845–64.Google Scholar

Schwarz, C. G. (1746) C. Plinii Caecilii Secundi Panegyricus, Nuremberg.Google Scholar

Schwerdtner, K. (2015) Plinius und seine Klassiker: Studien zur literarischen Zitation in den Pliniusbriefen, Berlin.Google Scholar

Scott, J. C. (1990) Domination and the arts of resistance: hidden transcripts, New Haven.Google Scholar

Seaford, R. (1987) ‘The tragic wedding’, JHS 107: 106–30.Google Scholar

Seel, O. (1977) Quintilian, oder: Die Kunst des Redens und Schweigens, Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Seelentag, G. (2004) Taten und Tugenden Traians. Herrschaftsdarstellung im Principat, Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Seelentag, G. (2011) ‘Imperial representation and reciprocation: the case of Trajan’, CJ 107: 73–97.Google Scholar

Sehlmeyer, F. 1912. Beziehungen zwischen Quintilians Institutiones oratoriae und Ciceros rhetorischen Schriften, Münster.Google Scholar

Seo, J. M. (2013) Exemplary traits: reading characterization in Roman poetry, Oxford.Google Scholar

Setaioli, A. (1976) ‘On the date of publication of Cicero’s letters to Atticus’, SO 51: 105–20.Google Scholar

Setaioli, A. (1988) Seneca e i greci: citazioni e traduzioni nelle opere filosofiche, Bologna.Google Scholar

Seyffert, M. (1861) ‘Zu Quintil. Inst. orat.’, Zeitschrift für das Gymnasialwesen 15: 295–8.Google Scholar

Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1965–70) Cicero’s letters to Atticus, 7 vols., Cambridge.Google Scholar

Shelton, J.-A. (2013) The women of Pliny’s letters, Abingdon.Google Scholar

Sherwin-White, A. N. (1959) Review of Syme 1958, JRS 49: 140–6.Google Scholar

Sherwin-White, A. N. (1966) The letters of Pliny. A historical and social commentary, Oxford (with corrected reprint, 1985).Google Scholar

Shuger, D. K. (1984) ‘The grand style and the genera dicendi in ancient rhetoric’, Traditio 40: 1–42.Google Scholar

Shuger, D. K. (1988) Sacred rhetoric: the Christian grand style in the English Renaissance, Princeton.Google Scholar

Silk, M., Gildenhard, I. and Barrow, R. (2014) The classical tradition: art, literature, thought, Malden, MA.Google Scholar

Sinclair, B. W. (1980) ‘Valerius Maximus and the evolution of silver Latin’, unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Cincinatti.Google Scholar

Sinclair, P. (1995) Tacitus the sententious historian. A sociology of rhetoric in Annales 1–6, University Park, PA.Google Scholar

Skutsch, O. (1985) The Annals of Quintus Ennius, Oxford.Google Scholar

Small, J. P. (1997) Wax tablets of the mind: cognitive studies of memory and literacy in classical antiquity, London.Google Scholar

Smiraglia, P. (1955) ‘Il Dialogus de oratoribus. Cronologia e rapporti con l’insegnamento di Quintiliano’, AFLN 5: 159–89.Google Scholar

Spalding, G. L. (1798–1816) M. Fabius Quintilianus. De institutione oratoria, 4 vols. (vol. 4 completed by Buttmann, P. K. from Inst. 12.3.7), Leipzig. Further volumes by Zumpt, K. G. (vol. 5, Supplementa annotationis et index, 1829) and Bonnell, E. (vol. 6, Lexicon Quintilianeum, 1834).Google Scholar

Spina, L. (2001) L’oratore scriteriato: per una storia letteraria e politica di Tersite, Naples.Google Scholar

Spina, L. (2010) ‘Umbratici doctores e studia in umbra educata: metafore per una querelle’, in Petrone, G. and Casamento, A., eds., Studia … in umbra educata. Percorsi della retorica latina in età imperiale, Palermo: 7–15.Google Scholar

Squire, M. J. (2009) Image and text in Graeco-Roman antiquity, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Squire, M. J. (2012) The Iliad in a nutshell: visualizing epic on the Tabulae Iliacae, Oxford.Google Scholar

Squire, M. J. (2014) ‘The ordo of rhetoric and the rhetoric of order’, in Elsner and Meyer 2014: 353–417.Google Scholar

Stadter, P. E. (2006) ‘Pliny and the ideology of empire: the correspondence with Trajan’, Prometheus 32: 61–76.Google Scholar

Starr, R. J. (1981) ‘Cross-references in Roman prose’, AJP 102: 431–7.Google Scholar

Stephanus, H. (Étienne, H.) (1591) C. Plin. Secundi Epist. libri IX … Adiunctae sunt Isaaci Casauboni notae etc., 2nd edn, Geneva.Google Scholar

Stevens, B. (2009) ‘Pliny and the dolphin – or a story about storytelling’, Arethusa 42: 161–79.Google Scholar

Stevenson, A. J. (2004) ‘Gellius and the Roman antiquarian tradition’, in Holford-Strevens and Vardi 2004: 118–55.Google Scholar

Storey, I. C. (2003) Eupolis: poet of Old Comedy, Oxford.Google Scholar

Stroh, W. (1975) Taxis und Taktik: Die advokatische Dispositionskunst in Ciceros Gerichtsreden, Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Suerbaum, W. (2004) ‘Tacitus schreibt eine unpolitische Geisterstory des Plinius in eine Aufsteigergeschichte um: Aufstieg und Fall des Curtius Rufus bei Plin. epist. 7,27,2f. und bei Tac. ann. 11,20f.’, in Ad fontes! Festschrift für Gerhard Dobesch zum 65. Geburtstag, Vienna: 493–504.Google Scholar

Suerbaum, W. (2016) ‘Ein anerkannt schlechtes Gedicht des jüngeren Plinius (epist. 7.4.6 = Plin. fr. 1 Bl.²)’, in Pieri, B. and Pellacani, D., eds., Si verba tenerem. Studi sulla poesia latina in frammenti, Berlin: 159–84.Google Scholar

Summers, W. C. (1910) Select letters of Seneca, London.Google Scholar

Syme, R. (1939) ‘Observations on the province of Cilicia’, in Calder, W. M. and Keil, J., eds., Anatolian studies presented to William Hepburn Buckler, Manchester: 299–332.Google Scholar

Syme, R. (1958) Tacitus, 2 vols., Oxford.Google Scholar

Syme, R. (1979a) ‘Juvenal, Pliny, Tacitus’, AJP 100: 250–78. Reprinted in Syme, R., Roman papers iii (ed. Birley, A. R., Oxford, 1984): 1135–57.Google Scholar

Syme, R. (1979b) ‘Ummidius Quadratus, capax imperii’, HSCP 82: 287–310. Reprinted in Syme, R., Roman papers iii (ed. Birley, A. R., Oxford, 1984): 1158–78.Google Scholar

Syme, R. (1985a) ‘Correspondents of Pliny’, Historia 34: 324–59. Reprinted in R. Syme, Roman papers v (ed. A. R. Birley, Oxford, 1988): 440–77.Google Scholar

Syme, R. (1985b) ‘The dating of Pliny’s last letters’, CQ 35: 176–85. Reprinted in Syme, R., Roman papers v (ed. Birley, A. R., Oxford, 1988): 478–89.Google Scholar

Syme, R. (1991) Roman papers vii (ed. Birley, A. R.), Oxford.Google Scholar

Tagliabue, A. (2016) ‘Heliodorus’ reading of Lucian’s Toxaris’, Mnemosyne 69: 397–419.Google Scholar

Taisne, A.-M. (2006) ‘Avatars du Dialogue des orateurs de Tacite dans les Silves de Stace et les Epîtres de Pline’, in Laurence, P. and Guillaumont, L., eds., Epistulae antiquae iv, Leuven: 161–9.Google Scholar

Talbert, R. J. A. (1984) The senate of imperial Rome, Princeton.Google Scholar

Tamás, A. (2015) ‘Tagesordnung. Dispositio der Alltagspraktiken bei Plinius dem Jüngeren’, in Haß and Noller 2015: 51–70.Google Scholar

Tarrant, R. J. (2006) ‘Seeing Seneca whole?’, in Volk, K. and Williams, G. D., eds., Seeing Seneca whole: perspectives on philosophy, poetry and politics, Leiden: 1–17.Google Scholar

Taylor, H. W. Jr. (1970) ‘An introduction and commentary to Book 3 of Quintilian’s Institutio oratoria’, unpublished PhD dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar

Tellegen-Couperus, O. E., ed. (2003) Quintilian and the law: the art of persuasion in law and politics, Leuven.Google Scholar

Telò, M. (2007) Eupolidis Demi, Florence.Google Scholar

Tempest, K. (2017) ‘Oratorical performance in Pliny’s Letters’, in Papaioannou, S., Serafim, A. and da Vela, B., eds., The theatre of justice: aspects of performance in Greco-Roman oratory and rhetoric, Leiden: 175–97.Google Scholar

Terrill, R. E. (2016) ‘Reproducing virtue: Quintilian, imitation, and rhetorical education’, Advances in the History of Rhetoric 19: 157–71.Google Scholar

Thomas, E. (1885) Review of Birt, T., Das antike Buchwesen in seinem Verhältniss zur Litteratur (1882), Revue critique d’histoire et de littérature 20: 87–93.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. F. (1982) ‘Catullus and the polemics of poetic reference (poem 64.1–18)’, AJP 103: 144–64.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. F. (1986) ‘Virgil’s Georgics and the art of reference’, HSCP 90: 171–98.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. F. (1988) Virgil. Georgics, 2 vols., Cambridge.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. F. (1992) ‘The old man revisited: memory, reference, and genre in Virg., Georg. 4, 116–48’, MD 29: 35–70.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. F. (1999) Reading Virgil and his texts: studies in intertextuality, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. F. (2009) ‘The Germania as literary text’, in Woodman 2009c: 59–72.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. F. (2011) Horace. Odes book 4 and Carmen saeculare, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Tischer, U. (2017) ‘Nostra faciamus. Quoting in Horace and Seneca’, in Stöckinger, M., Winter, K. and Zanker, A. T., eds., Horace and Seneca: interactions, intertexts, interpretations, Berlin: 289–313.Google Scholar

Tischer, U. and Binternagel, A., eds. (2010) Fremde Rede – Eigene Rede: Zitieren und verwandte Strategien in antiker Prosa, Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Toohey, P. (1993) Review of Farrell 1991, Electronic Antiquity 1.2.Google Scholar

Tosi, R. (2017) Dizionario delle sentenze latine e greche, rev. edn, Milan.Google Scholar

Townend, G. B. (1960) ‘The sources of the Greek in Suetonius’, Hermes 88: 98–120.Google Scholar

Traina, A. (1974) Lo stile ‘drammatico’ del filosofo Seneca, Bologna.Google Scholar

Traina, A. (1989) ‘Le traduzioni’, in Cavallo, Fedeli and Giardina 1989: ii, 93–123.Google Scholar

Traub, H. W. (1955) ‘Pliny’s treatment of history in epistolary form’, TAPA 86: 213–32. Reprinted in Gibson and Whitton 2016: 123–45.Google Scholar

Trinacty, C. (2009) ‘Like father, like son? Selected examples of intertextuality in Seneca the Elder and Seneca the Younger’, Phoenix 63: 260–77.Google Scholar

Trisoglio, F. (1973) Opere di Plinio Cecilio Secondo, 2 vols., Turin.Google Scholar

Tzounakas, S. (2013) ‘Martial’s Pliny as quoted by Pliny’, C&M 64: 247–68.Google Scholar

Tzounakas, S. (2015) ‘Pliny as the Roman Demosthenes’, in Devillers 2015: 207–18.Google Scholar

Tzounakas, S. (2017) ‘Self-presentation in Pliny’s Epistle 9.23’, in Gavrielatos, A., ed., Self-presentation and identity in the Roman world, Newcastle: 82–92.Google Scholar

Uden, J. (2015) The invisible satirist: Juvenal and second-century Rome, Oxford.Google Scholar

Uden, J. (2018) ‘Childhood education and the boundaries of interaction: [Plutarch], Quintilian, Juvenal’, in König and Whitton 2018b: 385–401.Google Scholar

Ueding, G., ed. (1994) Historisches Wörterbuch der Rhetorik. Band 2, Tübingen.Google Scholar

Urban, D. C. (2011) ‘The use of exempla from Cicero to Pliny the Younger’, unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar

Ussani, V. (1970) ‘Leggendo Plinio il Giovane, I. Historia – nomen inertiae’, RCCM 12: 271–348.Google Scholar

Ussani, V. (1971) ‘Leggendo Plinio il Giovane, II. Oratio – historia’, RCCM 13: 70–135.Google Scholar

van den Berg, C. (2014) The world of Tacitus’ Dialogus de Oratoribus: aesthetics and empire in ancient Rome, Cambridge.Google Scholar

van den Hout, M. P. J. (1999) A commentary on the letters of M. Cornelius Fronto, Leiden.Google Scholar

Vardi, A. D. (2000) ‘Brevity, conciseness, and compression in Roman poetic criticism and the text of Gellius’ Noctes Atticae 19.9.10’, AJP 121: 291–8.Google Scholar

Vardi, A. D. (2002) ‘A book of verse beneath a bough: literature for recreation in the early principate’, SCI 21: 83–96.Google Scholar

Vardi, A. D. (2004) ‘Genre, conventions, and cultural programme in Gellius’ Noctes Atticae’, in Holford-Strevens and Vardi 2004: 159–86.Google Scholar

Vaubel, E. (1969) Pudor, verecundia, reverentia. Untersuchungen zur Psychologie von Scham und Ehrfurcht bei den Römern bis Augustin, Münster.Google Scholar

Venini, P. (1952) ‘Le parole greche nell’epistolario di Plinio’, Rendiconti dell’Istituto Lombardo. Classe di lettere e scienze morali e storiche 85: 259–69.Google Scholar

Viano, C. (1995) ‘Quintiliano e la storia della filosofia: l’uso delle quaestiones philosopho convenientes’, Rhetorica 13: 193–207.Google Scholar

Vidman, L. (1982) Fasti Ostienses, 2nd edn, Prague.Google Scholar

Villaseñor Cuspinera, V. (2006) ‘La expresión del dolor: un sentimiento prescrito (Quint., Inst. or., VI. pr., Stat., Silv., V.V.)’, Nova Tellus 24: 93–121.Google Scholar

Vogt-Spira, G. (2003) ‘Die Selbstinszenierung des jüngeren Plinius im Diskurs der literarischen imitatio’, in Castagna and Lefèvre 2003: 51–65.Google Scholar

Voss, B.-R. (1963) Der pointierte Stil des Tacitus, Münster.Google Scholar

Vretska, H. and Vretska, K. (1979) Marcus Tullius Cicero, Pro Archia poeta: Ein Zeugnis für den Kampf des Geistes um seine Anerkennung, Darmstadt.Google Scholar

Walker, B. (1969) Review of Cova 1966, CP 64: 51–3.Google Scholar

Walsh, P. G. (2006) Pliny the Younger. Complete letters, Oxford.Google Scholar

Walzer, A. (2003) ‘Quintilian’s vir bonus and the Stoic wise man’, Rhetoric Society Quarterly 31: 25–41.Google Scholar

Walzer, A. (2006) ‘Moral philosophy and rhetoric in the Institutes: Quintilian on honor and expediency’, Rhetoric Society Quarterly 36: 263–81.Google Scholar

Watt, W. S. (1998) ‘Notes on Quintilian’, ZPE 121: 68–71.Google Scholar

Wecowski, M. (2016) ‘Herodotus in Thucydides: a hypothesis’, in Priestley, J. and Zali, V., eds., Brill’s companion to the reception of Herodotus in antiquity and beyond, Leiden: 17–33.Google Scholar

Weische, A. (1989) ‘Plinius d. J. und Cicero. Untersuchungen zur römischen Epistolographie in Republik und Kaiserzeit’, ANRW ii.33.1: 375–86.Google Scholar

Welch, T. (2013) ‘Was Valerius Maximus a hack?’, AJP 134: 67–82.Google Scholar

West, D. (1979) ‘Two plagues: Virgil, Georgics 3.478–566 and Lucretius 6.1090–1286’, in West and Woodman 1979b: 71–88.Google Scholar

West, D. and Woodman, T. [A. J.] (1979a) ‘Epilogue’, in West and Woodman 1979b: 195–200.Google Scholar

West, D. and Woodman, T. [A. J.], eds. (1979b) Creative imitation in Latin literature, Cambridge.Google Scholar

White, P. (1975) ‘The friends of Martial, Statius, and Pliny, and the dispersal of patronage’, HSCP 79: 265–300.Google Scholar

White, P. (2009) ‘Bookshops in the literary culture of Rome’, in Johnson and Parker 2009: 268–87.Google Scholar

White, P. (2010) Cicero in letters: epistolary relations of the late republic, Oxford.Google Scholar

Whitmarsh, T. J. G. (2007) ‘“This in-between book”: language, politics and genre in the Agricola’, in McGing, B. and Mossman, J. M., eds., The limits of biography, Swansea: 305–33.Google Scholar

Whitmarsh, T. J. G. (2013) Beyond the Second Sophistic: adventures in Greek postclassicism, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Whitton, C. L. (2010) ‘Pliny, Epistles 8.14: senate, slavery and the Agricola’, JRS 100: 118–39.Google Scholar

Whitton, C. L. (2011a) ‘Dubitatio comparativa: a misunderstood idiom in Pliny (Natural history 7.150), Tacitus (Histories 4.6) and others’, CQ 61: 267–77.Google Scholar

Whitton, C. L. (2011b) Review of Lefèvre 2009, CR 61: 147–9.Google Scholar

Whitton, C. L. (2012) ‘“Let us tread our path together”: Tacitus and the Younger Pliny’, in Pagán, V. E., ed., A companion to Tacitus, Malden, MA: 345–68.Google Scholar

Whitton, C. L. (2013a) Pliny the Younger. Epistles book 2, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Whitton, C. L. (2013b) ‘Trapdoors: the falsity of closure in Pliny’s Epistles’, in Grewing, F. and Acosta-Hughes, B., eds., The door ajar: false closure in Greek and Roman literature and art, Heidelberg: 43–61.Google Scholar

Whitton, C. L. (2014) ‘Minerva on the Surrey Downs: reading Pliny (and Horace) with John Toland’, CCJ 60: 127–57.Google Scholar

Whitton, C. L. (2015a) ‘Grand designs: unrolling Epistles 2’, in Marchesi 2015b: 109–43.Google Scholar

Whitton, C. L. (2015b) ‘Pliny on the precipice (Ep., 9.26)’, in Devillers 2015: 217–36.Google Scholar

Whitton, C. L. (2015c) ‘Pliny’s progress: on a troublesome Domitianic career’, Chiron 45: 1–22.Google Scholar

Whitton, C. L. (2018a) ‘Quintilian, Pliny, Tacitus’, in König and Whitton 2018b: 37–62.Google Scholar

Whitton, C. L. (2018b) ‘Alius aliud: context, commentary and Pliny (Epistles 9,3)’, in Tischer, U., Forst, A. and Gärtner, U., eds., Text, Kontext, Kontextualisierung: Moderne Kontextkonzepte und antike Literatur, Hildesheim: 137–60.Google Scholar

Whitton, C. L. and Gibson, R. K. (2016) ‘Readers and readings of Pliny’s Epistles’, in Gibson and Whitton 2016: 1–48.Google Scholar

von Wilamowitz-Möllendorff, U. (1900) ‘Asianismus und Attizismus’, Hermes 35: 1–52. Reprinted in Kleine Schriften 3, Berlin, 1969: 223–73.Google Scholar

Wille, G. (1967) Musica Romana: Die Bedeutung der Musik im Leben der Römer, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Williams, Gareth D. (2003) Seneca. De brevitate vitae and De otio, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Williams, Gordon (1968) Tradition and originality in Roman poetry, Oxford.Google Scholar

Williams, Gordon (1983) ‘Roman poets as literary historians: some aspects of imitatio’, ICS 8: 211–37.Google Scholar

Wills, J. (1996) Repetition in Latin poetry: figures of allusion, Oxford.Google Scholar

Wills, J. (1998) ‘Divided allusion: Virgil and the coma Berenices’, HSCP 98: 277–305.Google Scholar

Wilson, H. L. (1898) ‘The literary influence of Martial upon Juvenal’, AJP 19: 193–209.Google Scholar

Wilson, M. (2004) ‘Ovidian Silius’, Arethusa 37: 225–49.Google Scholar

Winterbottom, M. 1964. ‘Quintilian and the vir bonus’, JRS 54: 90–7.Google Scholar

Winterbottom, M. (1968) Review of Cova 1966, JRS 58: 303.Google Scholar

Winterbottom, M. (1970a) M. Fabi Quintiliani Institutionis oratoriae libri duodecim, 2 vols., Oxford.Google Scholar

Winterbottom, M. (1970b) Problems in Quintilian, London.Google Scholar

Winterbottom, M. (1974) The Elder Seneca, 2 vols., Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Winterbottom, M. (1975) ‘Quintilian and rhetoric’, in Dorey, T. A., ed., Empire and aftermath. Silver Latin II, London: 79–97.Google Scholar

Winterbottom, M. (1979) Review of Picone 1978, CR 29: 67–8.Google Scholar

Winterbottom, M. (1981) ‘Cicero and the Silver Age’, in Ludwig, W., ed., Éloquence et rhétorique chez Cicéron, Vandoeuvres: 237–74.Google Scholar

Winterbottom, M. (1983) ‘Quintilian and declamation’, in Hommages à Jean Cousin. Rencontres avec l’antiquité classique, Paris: 225–36.Google Scholar

Winterbottom, M. (1984) The Minor declamations ascribed to Quintilian, Berlin.Google Scholar

Winterbottom, M. (1989) ‘Cicero and the middle style’, in Diggle, J., Hall, J. B. and Jocelyn, H. D., eds., Studies in Latin literature and its tradition in honour of C. O. Brink. PCPS Supplement 15, Cambridge: 125–31.Google Scholar

Winterbottom, M. (1995) ‘On impulse’, in Innes, D., Hines, H. and Pelling, C., eds., Ethics and rhetoric: classical essays for Donald Russell on his seventy-fifth birthday, Oxford: 313–22.Google Scholar

Winterbottom, M. (1998) ‘Quintilian the moralist’, in Albaladejo, del Rio and Caballero 1998: i, 317–34.Google Scholar

Winterbottom, M. (2005) ‘Approaching the end: Quintilian 12.11’, AC 48: 175–83.Google Scholar

Winterbottom, M. (2006) ‘Declamation and philosophy’, Classica (Brazil) 19: 74–82.Google Scholar

Winterbottom, M. (2009) Review of Scarano Ussani 2008, CR 59: 634.Google Scholar

Wisse, J., Winterbottom, M. and Fantham, E. (2008) M. Tullius Cicero, De oratore libri III. Volume V: Commentary on book III, 96–230, Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Wolff, É. (2003) Pline le Jeune ou le refus de péssimisme, Rennes.Google Scholar

Wolff, É. (2004) ‘Pline et Cicéron: quelques remarques’, in Nadjo, L. and Gavoille, E., eds., Epistulae antiquae iii, Leuven: 441–7.Google Scholar

Woodman, A. J. (1975) ‘Questions of date, genre, and style in Velleius: some literary answers’, CQ: 272–306. Modified reprint in Woodman 2012: 201–22.Google Scholar

Woodman, A. J. (1988) Rhetoric and classical historiography: four studies, London.Google Scholar

Woodman, A. J. (1997) ‘Tacitus’, in Kraus, C. S. and Woodman, A. J., Latin historians, Oxford: 88–118.Google Scholar

Woodman, A. J. (1998) Tacitus reviewed, Oxford.Google Scholar

Woodman, A. J. (2006) ‘Mutiny and madness: Tacitus Annals 1.16–49’, Arethusa 39: 303–29. Reprinted in Woodman 2012: 296–321.Google Scholar

Woodman, A. J. (2009a) ‘Introduction’, in Woodman 2009c: 1–14.Google Scholar

Woodman, A. J. (2009b) ‘Tacitus and the contemporary scene’, in Woodman 2009c: 31–43. Reprinted in Woodman 2012: 243–56.Google Scholar

Woodman, A. J., ed. (2009c) The Cambridge companion to Tacitus, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Woodman, A. J., (2012) From poetry to history: selected papers, Oxford.Google Scholar

Woodman, A. J., (2014) Tacitus. Agricola. With C. S. Kraus, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Woodman, A. J., (2015) ‘Tacitus and Germanicus: monuments and models’, in Ash, R., Mossman, J. and Titchener, F. B., eds., Fame and infamy: essays on characterization in Greek and Roman biography and historiography, Oxford: 255–68.Google Scholar

Woodman, A. J., (2018) The Annals of Tacitus. Book 4, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Woodman, A. J., and Martin, R. H. (1996) The Annals of Tacitus. Book 3, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Woodman, T. [A. J.] (1979) ‘Self-imitation and the substance of history: Tacitus, Annals 1.61–5 and Histories 2.70, 5.14–15’, in West and Woodman 1979b: 143–55. Reprinted in Woodman 1998: 70–85.Google Scholar

Woolf, G. D. (2003) ‘The city of letters’, in Edwards, C. and Woolf, G., eds., Rome the cosmopolis, Cambridge: 203–21.Google Scholar

Woolf, G. D. (2015) ‘Pliny/Trajan and the poetics of empire’, CP 110: 132–51.Google Scholar

Wooten, C. W. (1997) ‘Cicero and Quintilian on the style of Demosthenes’, Rhetorica 15: 177–92.Google Scholar

Worman, N. (2015) Landscape and the spaces of metaphor in ancient literary theory and criticism, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Woytek, E. (2006) ‘Der Panegyricus des Plinius. Sein Verhältnis zum Dialogus und den Historiae des Tacitus und seine absolute Datierung’, WS 119: 115–56.Google Scholar

Yardley, J. C. (2003) Justin and Pompeius Trogus: a study of the language of Justin’s Epitome of Trogus, Toronto.Google Scholar

Yates, F. (1966) The art of memory, Chicago.Google Scholar

Young-Widmaier, M. R. (2002) ‘Quintilian’s legal representation of Julia Berenice’, Historia 51: 124–9.Google Scholar

Zadorojnyi, A. V. (2012) ‘Mimesis and the (plu)past in Plutarch’s Lives’, in Grethlein, J. and Krebs, C. B., eds., Time and narrative in ancient historiography: the ‘plupast’ from Herodotus to Appian, Cambridge: 175–98.Google Scholar

Zanker, P. and Ewald, B. C. (2012) Living with myths: the imagery of Roman sarcophagi (transl. Slater, J.), Oxford (orig. Mit Mythen leben: Die Bilderwelt der römischen Sarkophage, Munich, 2004).Google Scholar

Zehnacker, H. (2003) ‘Les lettres de Pline le Jeune, ou l’idéalisation du quotidien’, Vita Latina 168: 47–56.Google Scholar

Zehnacker, H. (2009–17) Pline le Jeune. Lettres, 4 vols. (French translation by N. Méthy from vol. 2), Paris.Google Scholar

Zetzel, J. (1983) ‘Catullus, Ennius, and the poetics of allusion’, ICS 8: 251–66.Google Scholar

Zetzel, J. (1995) Cicero. De re publica: selections, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Zinsmaier, T. (2003) ‘Quintilian als Deklamator. Die Topik des parens superstes im Proömium zu Buch VI der Institutio oratoria’, in Schröder, B.-J. and Schröder, J.-P., eds., Studium declamatorium: Untersuchungen zu Schulübungen und Prunkreden von der Antike bis zur Neuzeit, Munich: 153–68.Google Scholar

Zucchelli, B. (1974) ‘Il destino e la provvidenza in Quintiliano’, Paideia 29: 3–17.Google Scholar

Zucchelli, B. (1987) ‘Sulla data di pubblicazione dell’Institutio oratoria di Quintiliano’, in Boldrini, S., ed., Filologia e forme letterarie: studi offerti a Francesco della Corte, Urbino: iv, 47–60.Google Scholar

Zucker, F. (1929) ‘Plinius epist. VIII 24 – ein Denkmal antiker Humanität’, Philologus 84: 209–32.Google Scholar

Zundel, E. (1981) Lehrstil und rhetorischer Stil in Quintilians Institutio oratoria: Untersuchungen zur Form eines Lehrbuchs, Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Zundel, E. (1989) Clavis Quintilianea: Quintilians ‘Institutio oratoria’ aufgeschlüsselt nach rhetorischen Begriffen, Darmstadt.Google Scholar

Zwierlein, O. (1997) ‘Die chronische Unpäßlichkeit des Messalla Corvinus’, Hermes 125: 85–91.Google Scholar

Book contents

References

Access options

References

Book contents

References

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive