Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:30:12.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Differentiation and integration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2010

Get access

Summary

Differentiation

Degrees of replication in settlement patterns among the Rosario polity's centers and districts provide insights into degrees of differentiation (along the second subcontinuum contained in the segmentary-unitary continuum. Table 1). Presence or absence of replication (for centers and districts) is judged with reference to values arrived at on the various centralization measures (forced settlement, TDI, and TLI – Figure 15). Other available measures (for districts) are: territorial size, settlement density (and environmental composition), and tributary base size (TBS – Figure 15). A high degree of (horizontal) replication in centralization measures among all hierarchically equivalent units indicates a segmentary polity. Vertical replication of centralization measures across levels of a hierarchy (the PH) indicates segmentary structure, as does increasing degrees of centralization down the PH. Decreasing degrees of centralization down the PH indicate unitary structure. To a very great extent, the differentiation subcontinuum has an analytically residual quality with reference to the centralization subcontinuum. Many of the values examined with reference to differentiation have been generated while investigating centralization (Chapter 5).

At the outset, it appeared that a search for replication in internal layout and composition among sites (and wards) might be a useful way of examining degrees of differentiation in the Rosario polity (de Montmollin 1982a), but it soon turned out that this kind of analysis was inappropriate. Sites are too numerous and richly variable in their internal layout and composition to be effectively compared. Besides practical difficulties of too much detail, there are theoretical objections to the site scale.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Archaeology of Political Structure
Settlement Analysis in a Classic Maya Polity
, pp. 116 - 139
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×