Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T17:46:02.613Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part III - The Process of Social Control as Influenced by Appearance

From Mugshots to the Death Penalty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2019

Edited by
Bonnie Berry
Bonnie Berry
Affiliation:
Social Problems Research Group
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Appearance Bias and Crime , pp. 125 - 184
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Andersen, K. (2017, September 8). Hands up: It’s showtime. New York Times, p. A25.Google Scholar
Gay, R. (2017). Hunger: A memoir of (my) body. New York, NY: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Inside Edition. (2017, September 4). North Carolina man’s “hot mugshot” gets him a modeling job. Retrieved from http://nbc41.com/author/inside-edition.Google Scholar
Johnson, B. D. & King, R. (2017). Facial profiling: Race, physical appearance, and punishment. Criminology, 55, 520–547.Google Scholar
Lageson, S. E. (2017a, November 28). Personal communication.Google Scholar
Lageson, S. E., Bacak, V., & Powell, K. (2017b). Assessments of public defenders attrition. Paper presented at the American Society of Criminology annual meetings, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Lageson, S. E. (2017c). Crime data, the Internet, and free speech: An evolving legal consciousness. Law and Society Review, 15, 8–41.Google Scholar
Lageson, S. E. (2016a). Digital punishment’s tangled web. Contexts, Winter, 22–26.Google Scholar
Lageson, S. E. (2016b). Found out and opting out: The consequences of online criminal records for families. Annals (The Annals of the American Academy), 665, 127–141.Google Scholar
Manuel-Logan, R. (2017, January 28). Mug shot heartthrob Jeremy Meeks sentenced to federal prison. Retrieved from https://newsone.com/3089289.Google Scholar
Shaban, B., Bott, M., Villarreal, M., & Carroll, J. (2017, February 27). California schools call police on black students with disabilities far more often than other children. Retrieved from www.nbcbayarea.com/investigations.Google Scholar
Stolberg, S. G. (2017, April 15). Does a uniform keep officers in line? Baltimore thinks so. New York Times, pp. A1 and A13.Google Scholar

References

Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Bandes, S. A. (2016). Remorse and criminal justice. Emotion Review, 8, 14–18.Google Scholar
Berry, B. (2007). Beauty bias: Discrimination and social power. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
DeSantis, A. & Kayson, W. (1997). Defendants’ characteristics of attractiveness, race, and sex and sentencing decisions. Psychological Reports, 81, 679–683.Google Scholar
Eveleth, R. (2012, October 10). Trial by judgmental jury – Attractive women seem more guilty. Retrieved from www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/trial-by-judgmental-juryattractive-women-seem-more-guilty-69048349/.Google Scholar
Futty, J. (2014, January 13). Trials a rarity in Ohio. Retrieved from www.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2014/01/13/trials-a-rarity-in-ohio-u-s-.html.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual. New York, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Hollier, R. (2017). Physical attractiveness bias in the legal system. Retrieved from www.thelawproject.com.au/blog/attractiveness-bias-in-the-legal-system.Google Scholar
Ingriselli, E. (2015). Mitigating jurors’ racial biases: The effects of content and timing of jury instructions. The Yale Law Journal, 5, 1– 32.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, M. H. & Kristiansen, S. (2015). The social thought of Erving Goffman. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Jones, N. (2008). Working the code: On girls, gender, and inner-city violence. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 4, 63–83.Google Scholar
Lennard, N. (2011). “Why are black women less attractive?” asks Psychology Today. Retrieved from www.salon.com/2011/05/17/psychology_today_racist_black_women_attractive/.Google Scholar
Mauer, M. & Huling, T. (1995). Young Black Americans and the criminal justice system: Five years later. Retrieved from www.sentencingproject.org/publications/young-black-americans-and-the-criminal-justice-system-five-years-later/.Google Scholar
Otto, M. (2017). Teeth: The story of beauty, inequality, and the struggle for oral health in America. New York, NY: The New Press.Google Scholar
Paul, A. M. (1997, November 1). Judging by appearance. Retrieved from www.psychologytoday.com/articles/199711/judging-appearance.Google Scholar
Preston, K. (2017, September 25). Model claims “sexy” courtroom outfits turned a jury against her. Retrieved from https://honey.nine.com.au/2017/09/25/11/18/tara-lambert-court-outfits.Google Scholar
Robertson, K. (2016, January 25). Tara Lambert wears designer shoes during her trial. Retrieved from www.dispatch.com/photogallery/OH/20170608/NEWS/608009993/PH/1?start=2.Google Scholar
Robertson, K. (2016, January 27). Tara Lambert listens to the guilty verdict. Retrieved from www.dispatch.com/photogallery/OH/20170608/NEWS/608009993/PH/1?start=2.Google Scholar
Ukoha, E. (2016). Why the societal harassment of Leslie Jones exposes the ugly black woman syndrome. Retrieved from https://medium.com/@nilegirl/why-the-societal-harassment-of-leslie-jones-exposes-the-ugly-black-woman-syndrome-6fcc888f9dfb.Google Scholar
Zacharaiah, H. (2016, April 18). The inside story of Circleville femme fatale Tara Lambert. Retrieved from www.dispatch.com/article/20160418/LIFESTYLE/304189620.Google Scholar

References

Ahola, A. S., Christianson, S. Å., & Hellstrӧm, Å. (2009). Justice needs a blindfold: Effects of gender and attractiveness on prison sentences and attributions of personal characteristics in a judicial process. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 16, S90–S100.Google Scholar
Alicke, M. D. (2000). Culpable control and the psychology of blame. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 556–574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bergeron, C. E. & McKelvie, S. J. (2004). Effects of defendant age on severity of punishment for difference crimes. Journal of Social Psychology, 144, 75–90.Google Scholar
Burke, D. M., Ames, M. A., Etherington, R., & Pietsch, J. (1990). Effects of victim’s and defendant’s physical attractiveness on the perception of responsibility in an ambiguous domestic violence case. Journal of Family Violence, 5, 199–207.Google Scholar
Calhoun, L. G., Selby, J. W., Cann, A., & Keller, G. T. (1978). The effects of victim physical attractiveness and sex of respondent on social reactions to victims of rape. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17, 191–192.Google Scholar
Callan, M. J., Powell, N. G., & Ellard, J. H. (2007). The consequences of victim physical attractiveness on reactions to injustice: The role of observers’ belief in a just world. Social Justice Research, 20, 433–456.Google Scholar
Castellow, W. A., Wuensch, K. L., & Moore, C. H. (1990). Effects of physical attractiveness of the plaintiff and defendant in sexual harassment judgments. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 547–562.Google Scholar
Darby, B. W. & Jeffers, D. (1988). The effects of defendant and juror attractiveness on simulated courtroom trial decisions. Social Behavior and Personality, 16, 39–50.Google Scholar
Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285–290.Google Scholar
Erian, M., Lin, C., Patel, N., Neal, A., & Geiselman, R. E. (1998). Juror verdicts as a function of victim and defendant attractiveness in sexual assault cases. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 16, 25–40.Google Scholar
Gerdes, E. P., Dammann, E. J., & Heilig, K. E. (1988). Perceptions of rape victims and assailants: Effects of physical attractiveness, acquaintance, and subject gender. Sex Roles, 19, 141–153.Google Scholar
Hodell, E. C., Wasarhaley, N. E., Lynch, K. R., & Golding, J. M. (2014). Mock juror gender biases and perceptions of self-defense claims in intimate partner homicide. Journal of Family Violence, 29, 495–506.Google Scholar
Jacobson, M. B. (1981). Effects of victim’s and defendant’s physical attractiveness on subjects’ judgments in a rape case. Sex Roles, 7, 247–255.Google Scholar
Jacobson, M. B. & Popovich, P. M. (1983). Victim attractiveness and perceptions of responsibility in an ambiguous rape case. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 8, 100–104.Google Scholar
Jones, C. & Aronson, E. (1973). Attribution of fault to a rape victim as a function of respectability of the victim. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 415–419.Google Scholar
Kerr, N. L. (1978). Beautiful and blameless: Effects of victim attractiveness and responsibility on mock jurors’ verdicts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 479–482.Google Scholar
Lerner, M. J. (1965). Evaluation of performance as a function of performer’s reward and attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 355–360.Google Scholar
Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
MacCoun, R. J. (1990). The emergence of extralegal bias during jury deliberation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 303–314.Google Scholar
Mitchell, H. E. & Byrne, D. (1973). The defendant’s dilemma: Effects of jurors’ attitudes and authoritarianism on judicial decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 123–129.Google Scholar
Moore, C. H., Wuensch, K. L., Hedges, R. M., & Castellow, W. A. (1994). The effects of physical attractiveness and social desirability on judgments regarding a sexual harassment case. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 9, 715–730.Google Scholar
Rossi, P. H. & Nock, S. L. (Eds.). (1982). Measuring social judgments: The factorial survey approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Sargent, M. J. & Bradfield, A. L. (2004). Race and information processing in criminal trials: Does the defendant’s race affect how the facts are evaluated? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 995–1008.Google Scholar
Seligman, C., Brickman, J., & Koulack, D. (1977). Rape and physical attractiveness: Assigning responsibility to victims. Journal of Personality, 45, 554–563.Google Scholar
Shechory-Britton, M. & Zvi, L. (2016). Does offenders’ facial attractiveness affect police officers’ judgment? Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 23, 588–601.Google Scholar
Stewart, J. E. II. (1980). Defendant’s attractiveness as a factor in the outcome of criminal trials: An observational study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10, 348–361.Google Scholar
Thornton, B. (1977). Effect of rape victim’s attractiveness in a jury simulation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3, 666–669.Google Scholar
Thornton, B. & Ryckman, R. M. (1983). The influence of a rape victim’s physical attractiveness on observers’ attributions of responsibility. Human Relations, 36, 549–562.Google Scholar
Villemur, N. K. & Hyde, J. S. (1983). Effects of sex of defense attorney, sex or juror, and age and attractiveness of the victim on mock juror decision making in a rape case. Sex Roles, 9, 879–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Berry, B. (2008). The power of looks: Social stratification of physical appearance. Hampshire, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Bronson, C., Lawson, K., Clingman, J., Gerhardstein, A., Gibson, J., Greenwood, S., & Mingo, R. P. (2003). Racial Bias and Policing. Retrieved December 20, 2017, from: www.acluohio.org/assets/issues/PolicePractices/CincinnatiAgreement/Racial_Bias_and_Policing.pdf.Google Scholar
Castellow, W. A., Wuensch, K. L., & Moore, C. H. (1990). Effects of physical attractiveness of the plaintiff and defendant in sexual harassment judgements. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5(6), 547.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.Google Scholar
Dabney, D. A. & Ishoy, G. A. (2016). An audit of the racial profiling data collected by the Fulton County Police Department from 2008–2014. Atlanta, GA: Georgia State University.Google Scholar
Dabney, D. A., Teasdale, B., Ishoy, G. A., Gann, T., & Berry, B. (2017). Policing in a largely minority jurisdiction: The influence of appearance characteristics associated with contemporary hip-hop culture on police decision-making. Justice Quarterly, 34(7), 1310–1338.Google Scholar
Darby, B. W. & Jeffers, D. (1988). The effects of defendant and juror attractiveness on simulated courtroom trial decisions. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 16(1), 39–50.Google Scholar
DuRant, R. H., Rome, E. S., Rich, M., Allred, E., Emans, S. J., & Woods, E. R. (1997). Tobacco and alcohol use behaviors portrayed in music videos: A content analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 87(7), 1131–1135.Google Scholar
Efran, M. G. (1974). The effect of physical appearance on the judgment of guilt, interpersonal attraction, and severity of recommended punishment in a simulated jury task. Journal of Research in Personality, 8(1), 45–54.Google Scholar
Feild, H. S. (1978). Juror background characteristics and attitudes toward rape: Correlates of jurors’ decisions in rape trials. Law and Human Behavior, 2(2), 73.Google Scholar
Feild, H. S. (1979). Rape trials and jurors’ decisions: A psycholegal analysis of the effects of victim, defendant, and case characteristics. Law and Human Behavior, 3(4), 261.Google Scholar
Gerdes, E. P., Dammann, E. J., & Heilig, K. E. (1988). Perceptions of rape victims and assailants: Effects of physical attractiveness, acquaintance, and subject gender. Sex Roles, 19(3), 141–153.Google Scholar
Hosoda, M., Stone‐Romero, E. F., & Coats, G. (2003). The effects of physical attractiveness on job‐related outcomes: A meta‐analysis of experimental studies. Personnel Psychology, 56(2), 431–462.Google Scholar
Jackson, L. A., Hunter, J. E., & Hodge, C. N. (1995). Physical attractiveness and intellectual competence: A meta-analytic review. Social Psychology Quarterly, 108–122.Google Scholar
Jaeger, M. M. (2011). “A thing of beauty is a joy forever”? Returns to physical attractiveness over the life course. Social Forces, 89(3), 983–1003.Google Scholar
Johnson, B. D. & King, R. D. (2017). Facial profiling: Race, physical appearance, and punishment. Criminology, 55(3), 520–547.Google Scholar
Leventhal, G. & Krate, R. (1977). Physical attractiveness and severity of sentencing. Psychological Reports, 40(1), 315–318.Google Scholar
Lorenzo, G. L., Biesanz, J. C., & Human, L. J. (2010). What is beautiful is good and more accurately understood: Physical attractiveness and accuracy in first impressions of personality. Psychological Science, 21(12), 1777–1782.Google Scholar
Maeder, E. M., Yamamoto, S., & Saliba, P. (2015). The influence of defendant race and victim physical attractiveness on juror decision-making in a sexual assault trial. Psychology, Crime & Law, 21(1), 62–79.Google Scholar
Mathes, E. W. & Kahn, A. (1975). Physical attractiveness, happiness, neuroticism, and self-esteem. The Journal of Psychology, 90(1), 27–30.Google Scholar
Mazzella, R. & Feingold, A. (1994). The effects of physical attractiveness, race, socioeconomic status, and gender of defendants and victims on judgments of mock jurors: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(15), 1315–1338.Google Scholar
McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(3), 1771–1800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulford, M., Orbell, J., Shatto, C., & Stockard, J. (1998). Physical attractiveness, opportunity, and success in everyday exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 103(6), 1565–1592.Google Scholar
Patry, M. W. (2008). Attractive but guilty: Deliberation and the physical attractiveness bias. Psychological Reports, 102(3), 727–733.Google Scholar
Patzer, G. L. (2012). The physical attractiveness phenomena. New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice. (1967). Task Force Report: Science and Technology. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Sigall, H. & Ostrove, N. (1975). Beautiful but dangerous: Effects of offender attractiveness and nature of the crime on juridic judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(3), 410.Google Scholar
Smith, D. A. & Visher, C. A. (1981). Street-level justice: Situational determinants of police arrest decisions. Social Problems, 29(2), 167–177.Google Scholar
Smith, D. A., Visher, C. A., & Davidson, L. A. (1984). Equity and discretionary justice: The influence of race on police arrest decisions. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973), 75(1), 234–249.Google Scholar
Stewart, J. E. (1980). Defendant’s attractiveness as a factor in the outcome of criminal trials: An observational study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10(4), 348–361.Google Scholar
Stewart, J. E. (1985). Appearance and punishment: The attraction–leniency effect in the courtroom. The Journal of Social Psychology, 125(3), 373–378.Google Scholar
Thornton, B. & Ryckman, R. M. (1983). The influence of a rape victim’s physical attractiveness on observers’ attributions of responsibility. Human Relations, 36(6), 549–561.Google Scholar
Turner, J. S. (2011). Sex and the spectacle of music videos: An examination of the portrayal of race and sexuality in music videos. Sex Roles, 64(3–4), 173–191.Google Scholar
Visher, C. A. (1983). Gender, police arrest decisions, and notions of chivalry. Criminology, 21(1), 5–28.Google Scholar
Weitzer, R. & Tuch, S. A. (2005). Racially biased policing: Determinants of citizen perceptions. Social Forces, 83(3), 1009–1030.Google Scholar
Zebrowitz, L. A. & McDonald, S. M. (1991). The impact of litigants’ baby-facedness and attractiveness on adjudications in small claims courts. Law and Human Behavior, 15(6), 603–623.Google Scholar

References

Alang, S., McAlpine, D., McCreedy, E., & Hardeman, R. (2017). Police brutality and Black health: Setting the agenda for public health scholars. American Journal of Public Health, 107(5), 662–665.Google Scholar
Alpert, G. P. & Dunham, R. G. (2010). Policy and training recommendations related to police use of CEDs: Overview of findings from a comprehensive national study. Police Quarterly, 13(3), 235–259.Google Scholar
Alpert, G. P., Dunham, R. G., & Smith, M. R. (2007). Investigating racial profiling by the Miami‐Dade Police Department: A multimethod approach. Criminology & Public Policy, 6(1), 25–55.Google Scholar
Auten, J. H. (1981). The paramilitary model of police and police professionalism. Police Studies: International Review Police Development, 4, 67.Google Scholar
Balko, R. (2013). Overkill: The rise of paramilitary police raids in America. Cato’s Letter, 11(4), 1–5.Google Scholar
Bausman, C. & Shaul, R. (2016). Active Shooters: Patrol Tasked to Respond, but Are They Out-Gunned, Under-Equipped, And Under-Trained? And What Does This Mean for SWAT? Mountain Tactical Institute, Retrieved December 3, 2017, from http://mtntactical.com/research/evolving-to-the-threat-law-enforcement-responses-to-active-shooters/.Google Scholar
Bieler, S. (2016). Police militarization in the USA: The state of the field. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 39(4), 586–600.Google Scholar
Bishopp, S. A., Klinger, D. A., & Morris, R. G. (2015). An examination of the effect of a policy change on police use of TASERs. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 26(7), 727–746.Google Scholar
Bove, V. & Gavrilova, E. (2017). Police officer on the frontline or a soldier? The effect of police militarization on crime. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 9(3), 1–18.Google Scholar
Brown, A., Blaskovits, B., Ewanation, L., Baldwin, S., & Bennell, C. (2017, September). Looking the part: Examining public perceptions of grooming and body modification in law enforcement. Paper accepted for the meeting of Society for Police and Criminal Psychology, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
Callanan, V. J. & Rosenberger, J. S. (2011). Media and public perceptions of the police: Examining the impact of race and personal experience. Policing & Society, 21(2), 167–189.Google Scholar
Cao, L., Frank, J., & Cullen, F. T. (1996). Race, community context and confidence in the police. American Journal of Police, 15(1), 3–22.Google Scholar
Coffin, B. (2007). WARZONE: The North Hollywood shootout, 10 years later. Risk Management, 54(3), 36.Google Scholar
Culhane, S. E., Boman, J. H., & Schweitzer, K. (2016). Public perceptions of the justifiability of police shootings: The role of body cameras in a pre-and post-Ferguson experiment. Police Quarterly, 19(3), 251–274.Google Scholar
Dabney, D. A., Teasdale, B., Ishoy, G. A., Gann, T., & Berry, B. (2017). Policing in a largely minority jurisdiction: The influence of appearance characteristics associated with contemporary hip-hop culture on police decision-making. Justice Quarterly, 34(7), 1310–1338.Google Scholar
Douglas, J. & Allen, G. (2017, November 23). Police told to leave protective gear behind. CBSDFW report. Retrieved from http://dfw.cbslocal.com/2017/06/29/police-told-to-leave-protective-gear-behind/.Google Scholar
Dowler, K. & Zawilski, V. (2007). Public perceptions of police misconduct and discrimination: Examining the impact of media consumption. Journal of Criminal Justice, 35(2), 193–203.Google Scholar
Dunham, R. G. & Petersen, N. (2017). Making Black lives matter. Criminology & Public Policy, 16(1), 341–348.Google Scholar
Engel, R. S., Klahm, C. F., & Tillyer, R. (2010). Citizens’ demeanor, race, and traffic stops. In Rice, S. & White, M. (Eds.), Race, ethnicity, and policing: New and essential readings (pp. 287–308). New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Fridell, L. A. (2017). Explaining the disparity in results across studies assessing racial disparity in police use-of-force: A research note. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 42(3), 502–513.Google Scholar
Graziano, L., Schuck, A., & Martin, C. (2010). Police misconduct, media coverage, and public perceptions of racial profiling: An experiment. Justice Quarterly, 27(1), 52–76.Google Scholar
Harris, D. A. (1999). The stories, the statistics, and the law: Why driving while Black matters. Minnesota Law Review, 84, 265.Google Scholar
Hine, K. A., Porter, L. E., Westera, N. J., & Alpert, G. P. (2016). Too much or too little? Individual and situational predictors of police force relative to suspect resistance. Policing & Society, https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2016.1232257.Google Scholar
Institute for Intergovernmental Research. (2015). After-Action Assessment of the Police Response to the August 2014 Demonstrations in Ferguson, Missouri. COPS Office Critical Response Initiative. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.Google Scholar
James, L., James, S. M., & Vila, B. J. (2016). The reverse racism effect. Criminology & Public Policy, 15(2), 457–479.Google Scholar
Jetelina, K. K., Gonzalez, J. M. R., & Bishopp, S. A. (2017). Gradual escalation of use-of-force reduces police officer injury. Injury Prevention, http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2016-042198.Google Scholar
Jetelina, K. K., Jennings, W. G., Bishopp, S. A., Piquero, A. R., & Reingle-Gonzalez, J. M. (2017). Dissecting the complexities of the relationship between police officer–civilian race/ethnicity dyads and less-than-lethal use-of-force. American Journal of Public Health, 107(7), 1164–1170.Google Scholar
Joh, E. E. (2016). Policing police robots. UCLA Law Review Discourse, 64, 516–543.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. R. (2001). The psychological influence of the police uniform. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 70, 27.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. R. (2005). Police uniform color and citizen impression formation. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 20(2), 58–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, R. R., Plecas, D., Anderson, S., & Dolan, H. (2015). No hat or tie required: Examining minor changes to the police uniform. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 30(3), 158–165.Google Scholar
Jordan, W., Fridell, L., Faggiani, D., & Kubu, B. (2009). Attracting females and racial/ethnic minorities to law enforcement, Journal of Criminal Justice, 37(4), 333–341.Google Scholar
Kappeler, V. E. & Kraska, P. (2015). Normalising police militarization, living in denial. Policing and Society, 25(3), 268–275.Google Scholar
Klinger, D. A. (1994). Demeanor or crime? Why “hostile” citizens are more likely to be arrested. Criminology, 32(3), 475–493.Google Scholar
Klinger, D. A. (1997). Negotiating order in patrol work: An ecological theory of police response to deviance. Criminology, 35(2), 277–306.Google Scholar
Klinger, D. A. & Grossman, D. (2001). Who should deal with foreign terrorists on US Soil: Socio-legal consequences of September 11 and the ongoing threat of terrorist attacks in America. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 25, 815.Google Scholar
Klinger, D., Rosenfeld, R., Isom, D., & Deckard, M. (2016). Race, crime, and the micro-ecology of deadly force. Criminology & Public Policy, 15(1), 193–222.Google Scholar
Kraska, P. B. (2007). Militarization and policing – Its relevance to 21st century police. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 1(4), 501–513.Google Scholar
Kraska, P. B. & Cubellis, L. J. (1997). Militarizing Mayberry and beyond: Making sense of American paramilitary policing. Justice Quarterly, 14(4), 607–629.Google Scholar
Kraska, P. B. & Kappeler, V. E. (1997). Militarizing American police: The rise and normalization of paramilitary units. Social problems, 44(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
Kraska, P. B. & Paulsen, D. J. (1997). Grounded research into US paramilitary policing: Forging the iron fist inside the velvet glove. Policing and Society: An International Journal, 7(4), 253–270.Google Scholar
Lee, J. (2016). Police use of nonlethal force in New York City: Situational and community factors. Policing and Society, 26(8), 875–888.Google Scholar
Lim, H. (2017). Police bias, use of deadly force, public outcry. Criminology & Public Policy, 16(1), 305–308.Google Scholar
Lott, J. R. & Moody, C. E. (2016, November 29). Do white police officers unfairly target black suspects? Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from https://cargogunclub.org/files/John%20Lott%20Crime%20Study.pdf.Google Scholar
Merchant, N. (2015). Suspect killed after attack on Dallas Police headquarters, Associated Press report, Fox4 News, www.fox4news.com/news/suspect-killed-after-attack-on-dallas-police-headquarters.Google Scholar
Miller, T. R., Lawrence, B. A., Carlson, N. N., Hendrie, D., Randall, S., Rockett, I. R., & Spicer, R. S. (2017). Perils of police action: A cautionary tale from US data sets. Injury prevention, 23(1), 27–32.Google Scholar
Nix, J., Campbell, B. A., Byers, E. H., & Alpert, G. P. (2017). A bird’s eye view of civilians killed by police in 2015. Criminology & Public Policy, 16(1), 309–340.Google Scholar
Paoline, E. A., Gau, J. M., & Terrill, W. (2016). Race and the police use-of-force encounter in the United States. The British Journal of Criminology, https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azw089.Google Scholar
Paul, J. & Birzer, M. L. (2004). Images of power: An analysis of the militarization of police uniforms and messages of service. Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology, 32(2), 121–128.Google Scholar
President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing. (2015). Final Report of the President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.Google Scholar
Schildkraut, J., Elsass, H. J., & Meredith, K. (2017). Mass shootings and the media: Why all events are not created equal. Journal of Crime and Justice, doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2017.1284689.Google Scholar
Schmidt, C. J. & Klinger, D. A. (2005). Altering the Posse Comitatus Act: Letting the military address terrorist attacks on US soil. Creighton Law Review, 39, 667.Google Scholar
Simpson, R. (2017). The police officer perception project (POPP): An experimental evaluation of factors that impact perceptions of the police. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 13(3), 393–415.Google Scholar
Simpson, R. & Hipp, J. R. (2017). What came first: The police or the incident? Bidirectional relationships between police actions and police incidents. Policing and Society, https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2017.1405957.Google Scholar
Singer, M. S. & Singer, A. E. (1985). The effect of police uniform on interpersonal perception. The Journal of Psychology, 119(2), 157–161.Google Scholar
Skolnick, J. H. (2007). Racial profiling – Then and now. Criminology & Public Policy, 6(1), 65–70.Google Scholar
Thielmann, S (2016). Use of police robot to kill Dallas shooting suspect believed to be first in US history. The Guardian. Downloaded December 1, 2017 from www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/jul/08/police-bomb-robot-explosive-killedsuspect-dallas.Google Scholar
Todak, N. (2017). De-escalation in police–citizen encounters: A mixed methods study of a misunderstood policing strategy, PhD dissertation, Arizona State University.Google Scholar
Turner, F. W. & Fox, B. H. (2017). Public servants or police soldiers? An analysis of opinions on the militarization of policing from police executives, law enforcement, and members of the 114th Congress US House of Representatives. Police Practice and Research, https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2017.1371600.Google Scholar
Volpp, J. M. & Lennon, S. J. (1988). Perceived police authority as a function of uniform hat and sex. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 67(3), 815–824.Google Scholar
Warren, P., Tomaskovic-Devey, D., Smith, W., Zingraff, M., & Mason, M. (2006). Driving while black: Bias processes and racial disparity in police stops. Criminology, 44(3), 709–738.Google Scholar
White, M. (2010). Introduction to Part III in Rice, S. & White, M. (Eds.), Race, ethnicity, and policing: New and essential readings. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
White, M. D., Gaub, J. E., & Todak, N. (2017). Exploring the potential for body-worn cameras to reduce violence in police–citizen encounters. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paw057.Google Scholar
Womack, V. G., Morris, R. G., & Bishopp, S. A. (2016). Do changes in TASER use policy affect police officer injury rates? Police Quarterly, 19(4), 410–434.Google Scholar
Worrall, J. L. (1999). Public perceptions of police efficacy and image: The “fuzziness” of support for the police. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 24(1), 47–66.Google Scholar
Wu, Y., Sun, I. Y., & Triplett, R. A. (2009). Race, class or neighborhood context: Which matters more in measuring satisfaction with police? Justice Quarterly, 26(1), 125–156.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×