Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:29:12.232Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - Environmental considerations in agricultural negotiations in the new WTO round

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2010

John Whalley
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario
Merlinda D. Ingco
Affiliation:
The World Bank
L. Alan Winters
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The history of agricultural trade is well known. Articles XI and XVI of the GATT allowed countries to use both export subsidies and quota-based import restrictions to support farm incomes. The 1955 open-ended waiver granted to the United States effectively allowed that country to use any form of trade-restricting measures in agriculture. The terms of Switzerland's 1956 accession, which were similar to the US waiver, and the 1957 European Community Treaty of Rome with its Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and variable levies, further contributed to undisciplined interventions in agricultural trade.

This lack of discipline allowed trade distortions to grow, as countries moved from net-importer to net-exporter status in key products and competition to provide subsidies to exporters intensified. Attempts to discipline these practices during the Kennedy and Tokyo Rounds for all intents and purposes failed, despite declarations of intent at the launch of each round. The Uruguay Round – driven by agricultural exporters' concerns over their lack of market access, budget concerns over the cost of domestic support programs, and fears of unbridled competition among export subsidizers – injected novel international discipline into the sector. The chosen route was not to unwind all previous departures from GATT/WTO principles but to develop a new structure of restraints that could be progressively tightened to further liberalize trade.

Environmental considerations entered little into these decisions.

Type
Chapter
Information
Agriculture and the New Trade Agenda
Creating a Global Trading Environment for Development
, pp. 386 - 400
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agarwal, A., 1996. “Pay-Offs to Progress,” Down to Earth (Centre for Science and Environment, New Delhi), 5(10), 31–9Google Scholar
Alfsen, K. H., DeFranco, M. A., Glomsrod, S., and Johnsen, T., 1996. “The Cost of Soil Erosion in Nicaragua,” Ecological Economics, 16, 129–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, K., 1992. “Agricultural Trade Liberalization and the Environment: A Global Perspective,” The World Economy, 15(1), 153–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asian Development Bank (Asian Development Bank), 1997. “Emerging Asia-Changes and Challenges,” Manilla
Barbier, F., 1996. “The Economics of Soil Erosion: Theory, Methodology and Examples,” Special Paper, Economy and Environmental Program of South East Asia, May
Coase, R., 1960. “The Problem of Social Cost,” Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francois, J. F., H. McDonald, and H. Nordström, 1996. “The Uruguay Round: a Numerically Based Qualitative Assessment,” in W. Martin and A. L. Winters (eds.), The Uruguay Round and The Developing Countries, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press
Glover, D. and T. Jessup (eds.), 1999. Indonesia's Fires and Haze: The Cost of Catastrophe, Singapore and Canada: International Development Research Centre/Institute of Southeast Asian Studies
Goldin, I. and D. van der Mensbrugghe, 1996. “Assessing Agricultural Tariffication Under the Uruguay Round,” in W. Martin and L. A. Winters (eds.), The Uruguay Round and the Developing Countries, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press
Harrison, G. W., T. F. Rutherford, and D. G. Tarr, 1996. “Quantifying the Uruguay Round,” in W. Martin and A. L. Winters (eds.), The Uruguay Round and the Developing Countries, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press
Hathaway, D. E., 1987. “Agriculture and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade: Rewriting the Rules,” Institute for International Economics, 20Google Scholar
International Institute for Trade and Sustainable Development (International Institute for Trade and Sustainable Development), 1999. “Bridges Between Trade and Sustainable Development”
Ingco, M. D., 1996. “Tariffication in the Uruguay Round: How Much Liberalization?,” The World Economy, 19(4), 425–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingersent, K. A., Rayner, A. J., and Hine, R. C., 1995. “Expost Evaluation of the Uruguay Round Agricultural Agreement,” The World Economy, 18(5), 707–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, J. H., 1989. The World Trading System, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Jha, R. and J. Whalley, 1999. “The Environmental Regime in Developing Countries,” paper presented at the FEEM/NBER conference, Milan, June
Lipsey, R. G. and Lancaster, K. J., 1957. “The General Theory of the Second Best,” Review of Economic Studies, 24, 11–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López, R., 1997. “Evaluating Economywide Policies in the Presence of Agricultural Environmental Externalities: The Case of Ghana,” in W. Cruz, M. Munasinghe, and J. J. Warford (eds.), The Greening of Economic Policy Reform, II: Case Studies, Washington, DC: World Bank
Magrath, W. and P. Arens, 1989. “The Costs of Soil Erosion on Java: A Natural Resource Accounting Approach,” Environment Working Paper, 18, Environment Department, World Bank
Meade, J. E., 1952. “External Economies and Diseconomies in a Competitive Situation,” Economic Journal, 62, 654–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pigou, A. C., 1918. The Economics of Welfare, London: Macmillan
Resosudarmo, B., 1999. “The Economy Wide Impacts of Integrated Pest Management in Indonesia,” Economy and Environment Program of South East Asia (Economy and Environment Program of South East Asia), Singapore
Smil, V., 1992. “Environmental Changes as a Source of Conflict and Economic Losses in China,” paper prepared for a Workshop on Environmental Change, Economic Decline, and Civil Strife, Institute for Strategic and International Studies, Kuala Lumpur, 1991
Swinbank, A., 1999. “European Union Agriculture, Agenda 2000 and the World Trade Organization Commitments,” The World Economy, 22(1), 41–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tangermann, S., 1997. “A Developed Country Perspective of the Agenda for the Next World Trade Organization Round of Agricultural Negotiations,” Occasional Paper, World Trade Organization Series, 5, Program for the Study of International Organizations, Geneva
Uimonen, P., 1998. “The Environmental Dilemmas of the World Trade Organization,” in J. J. Schott (ed.), Launching New Global Trade Talks: An Action Agenda, Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics
Uimonen, P. and J. Whalley, 1997. Environmental Issues in the New World Trading System, London: Macmillan
United Nations (UN), 1999. Human Development Report 1998, New York: United Nations
Weerahewa, J., 1999. “Impact of Trade Liberalization on the Environment: The Case of Tariff Reduction for Potato in Sri Lanka,” Economy and Environment Program of South East Asia (Economy and Environment Program of South East Asia), Singapore
Whalley, J., 1996. “Trade and Environment Beyond Singapore,” Working Paper, 5768, National Bureau of Economic Research
World Trade Organization (World Trade Organization), 1998. “Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures,” World Trade Organization Agreement Series, 4, Geneva
World Trade Organization 1999. “Environmental Effects of Trade Liberalization in the Agricultural Sector,” submission by Norway to the Committee on Trade and Environment, WT/Committee of Trade and Environment/W/100, Geneva

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×