Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:08:57.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2022

Edited by
Peter Harrison  and
John Milbank
Peter Harrison
Affiliation:
University of Queensland
John Milbank
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
After Science and Religion
Fresh Perspectives from Philosophy and Theology
 , pp. 325 - 347
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Alan of Lille, Sermon on the Intelligible Sphere, in Literary Works, tr. Wetherbee, Winthrop (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Anon., Liber XXIV Philosophorum, II; Le Livre des XXIV philosophes, tr. Hudry, Françoise (Grenoble: Jerome Millon, 1989).Google Scholar
Aristotle, Complete Works of Aristotle, 2 vols., ed. Barnes, Jonathan (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Aristotle, On the Soul. Parva Naturalia. On Breath, tr. Hett, W. S., Loeb Classical Library (London: Loeb, 1964).Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis, The New Organon, ed. Jardine, Lisa and Silverthorne, Michael (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis, The Works of Francis Bacon, 14 vols., ed. Spedding, James, Ellis, Robert, and Heath, Douglas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Birks, Thomas Rawson, Modern Physical Fatalism and the Doctrine of Evolution (London: Macmillan, 1876).Google Scholar
Boethius, , De trinitate, in Theological Tractates and The Consolation of Philosophy, tr. Stewart, H. F., Rand, E. K., and Tester, S. J., Loeb Classical Library (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1973).Google Scholar
Cicero, , On the Nature of the Gods and Academica, tr. Rackham, H., Loeb Classical Library (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1933).Google Scholar
Conway, Anne, The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Cudworth, Ralph, A Treatise of Freewill, in A Treatise Concerning Eternal and Immutable Morality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culverwell, Nathaniel, An Elegant and Learned Discourse of the Light of Nature (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 2001).Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles, The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, 6th ed. (London: John Murray, 1873).Google Scholar
Laertius, Diogenes, Lives of Eminent Philosophers, 2 vols., tr. Hicks, R. D., Loeb Classical Library (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1972).Google Scholar
Drummond, Henry, Natural Law in the Spiritual World (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1883).Google Scholar
Evelyn, John, Sylva: A Discourse of Forest Trees and the Propagation of Timber (London: Echo, 2009).Google Scholar
Fairbairn, A. M., Studies in the Philosophy of Religion and History (London: Strahan, 1876).Google Scholar
Flint, Robert, Theism, 9th ed. (Edinburgh: William Blackwood and Sons, 1895).Google Scholar
Francis, , Laudato si ‘On Care for Our Common Home’ (Vatican City: Vatican Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Giles of Viterbo, The Commentary on the Sentences of Petrus Lombardus, ed. Nodes, Daniel (Leiden: Brill, 2010).Google Scholar
Thaumaturgus, Gregory, Address of Thanksgiving to Origen, in St. Gregory Thaumaturgus: Life and Works, ed. and tr. Slusser, Michael (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Greville, Robert, The Nature of Truth [1640] (London: Gregg International, 1969).Google Scholar
Grosseteste, Robert, Commentarius in Posteriorum Analyticorum Libros, ed. Rossi, Pietro (Florence: Leo S. Olschki, 1981).Google Scholar
Grosseteste, Robert, On the Cessation of the Laws, tr. Hilderbrand, Stephen M. (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosseteste, Robert, La Luce: Introduzione, Testo Latino, Traduzione e Commento. ed. Panti, Cecilia, tr. Lewis, Neil (Pisa: Edizioni Plus, 2011).Google Scholar
Grosseteste, Robert, On the Six Days of Creation: A Translation of the Hexaëmeron, tr. Martin, C. F. J. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Grosseteste, Robert, Die Philosophischen Werke des Robert Grosseteste, Bischofs von Lincoln, ed. Baur, L. (Aschendorff: Münster, 1912).Google Scholar
Grosseteste, Robert, The Scientific Works of Robert Grosseteste, 6 vols., ed. Gasper, Giles E. M., Panti, Cecilia, McLeish, Tom, and Smithson, Hannah E. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019), vol. 1.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Willhelm Friedrich, The Logic of Hegel, tr. Wallace, William (Oxford: Clarendon, 1874).Google Scholar
Herbert of Cherbury, Edward, De veritate, tr. Carré, Meyrick H. (London: Routledge-Thoemmes; Tokyo: Kinokuniya, 1992).Google Scholar
Huxley, Leonard (ed.) Life and Letters of Thomas Henry Huxley, 2 vols. (New York: D. Appleton, 1900), vol. 1.Google Scholar
Huxley, Thomas Henry, ‘The Evidence of the Miracle of the Resurrection’, in Marshall, Catherine, Lightman, Bernard, and England, Richard (eds.), The Papers of the Metaphysical Society 1869–1880: A Critical Edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), vol. 2, 366–72.Google Scholar
Huxley, Thomas Henry, Science and Hebrew Tradition (London: Macmillan, 1893).Google Scholar
[Huxley, Thomas Henry], ‘Science and Religion’, The Builder, 18 (1859), 35.Google Scholar
Imperial College, Huxley Papers, Huxley to James Creelman, June 11, 1894, Volume 12, 343.Google Scholar
Isaac of Stella, Sermons on the Christian Year, vol. 1, intro. McGinn, B., tr. McCaffery, Hugh (Collegeville, MN: Cistercian Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Iverach, James, Theism in the Light of Present Science and Philosophy (New York: Macmillan, 1899).Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas, ‘To John Hollins, February 19, 1809’, in Peterson, Merrill D. (ed.), Thomas Jefferson: Writings (New York: Library of America, 1984).Google Scholar
Kingsley, Fanny (ed.), Charles Kingsley: His Letters and Memories of His Life (London: Henry S. King, 1877), vol. 2.Google Scholar
Locke, John, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Martineau, James, Essays, Reviews and Addresses (London: Longmans, Green, 1891), vol. 3.Google Scholar
Matheson, George, Can the Old Faith Live with the New? or, The Problem of Evolution and Revelation (Edinburgh: William Blackwood & Sons, 1885).Google Scholar
Moore, Aubrey L., Science and the Faith: Essays on Apologetic Subjects (London: Kegan Paul, Trench, 1889).Google Scholar
Morris, F. O., All the Articles of the Darwin Faith (London: Moffatt, Paige, 1875).Google Scholar
Nāgārjuna, , Nāgārjuna’s Middle Way, tr. Sideris, Mark and Katsura, Shōryū (Somerville, MA: Wisdom Publications, 2013).Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac, Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, tr. Andrew Motte with a preface by Roger Cotes (London, 1729).Google Scholar
Nicholas of Cusa, Coniectura de Ultimis Diebus, tr. Jasper Hopkins, in Nicolai de Cusa Opera Omnia, vol. IV (Opuscula I), ed. Wilpert, Paul (Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1959)Google Scholar
Nicholas of Cusa, De docta ignorantia, 3 vols., ed. and tr. Wilpert, P., Senger, H. G, and Klibansky, R., Philosophische Bibliothek, vols. 264a–c (Leipzig-Hamburg: Meiner, 1994–9),Google Scholar
Nicholas of Cusa, On Learned Ignorance, in Selected Spiritual Writings, tr. Lawrence Bond, H. (New York: Paulist Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Nicholas of Cusa, Opera Omnia jussu et auctoritate Academicae Litterarum Heidelbergensis (Leipzig-Hamburg: Meiner, 1932–2007).Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich, The Gay Science, tr. Kaufmann, Walter (New York: Vintage Books, 1974).Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich, Thus Spoke Zarathustra (New York: Viking, 1966).Google Scholar
Oken, Lorenz, Elements of Physiophilosophy, tr. Tulk, Alfred (London: Ray Society, 1847).Google Scholar
Origen, , On First Principles, ed. and tr. Behr, John (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Origen, , The Song of Songs: Commentary and Homilies, tr. Lawson, R. P. (Westminster: Newman Press, 1957).Google Scholar
Pascal, Blaise, Pensées, tr. Potter, W. F. (London: Dent, 1910).Google Scholar
Patrologia cursus completus, series Latina, ed. Migne, J.-P. (Paris, 1857–1912)Google Scholar
Plato, , The Collected Dialogues of Plato, ed. Hamilton, Edith and Cairns, Huntington (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Plotinus, , The Enneads, ed. Gerson, Lloyd P., tr. George Boys-Stones, John M. Dillon, Lloyd P. Gerson, R. A. King, Andrew Smith, and James Wilberding (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Ruskin, John, Unto This Last (New York: Penguin, 1985).Google Scholar
Temple, Frederick, The Relation between Religion and Science (London: Macmillan, 1884).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas, Commentary on Aristotle’s Physics, tr. Blackwell, Richard J., Spath, Richard J., and Thirkel, W. Edmund (Notre Dame, IN: Dumb Ox Books, 1999).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas, Commentary on Metaphysics, 2 vols., tr. Rowan, John. P. (Green Bay, WI: Aquinas Institute, 2020).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas, On Truth (‘Quaestiones disputatae de veritate’), tr. Schmidt, Robert W. (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing, 1954).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas, The Summa Theologiae of St. Thomas Aquinas, 2nd ed. rev., 10 vols. (London: Burns Oates and Washbourne, 1920–2).Google Scholar
Tyndall, John, Fragments of Science, 8th ed. (London: Longmans, Green 1892), vol. 2.Google Scholar
Vico, Giambattista, De antiquissima italorum sapientia: liber metaphysicus, Opere filosofiche (Florence, Sansoni, 1971).Google Scholar
Vico, Giambattista, On the Most Ancient Wisdom of the Italians, tr. Taylor, Jason (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
von Goethe, Johann Wolfgang, Goethe’s Botanical Writings, tr. Mueller, B. (Woodbridge: Oxbow Press, 1989).Google Scholar
von Goethe, Johann Wolfgang, Westminster Sermons (London: Macmillan, 1874).Google Scholar
[Samuel, Wilberforce], ‘Darwin’s Origin of Species’, Quarterly Review, 108 (July 1860), 225–64.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian, Philosophia rationalis sive Logica, 3rd ed. (Verona, 1735).Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William, The Prelude: The Four Texts (1798, 1799, 1805, 1850) (London: Penguin, 1995).Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Agamben, Giorgio, The Signature of All Things: On Method, tr. di Santo, Luca and Attell, Kevin (New York: Zone, 2009).Google Scholar
Albertson, David, Mathematical Theologies: Nicholas of Cusa and the Legacy of Thierry of Chartres (New York: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Alfsvåg, Knut, What No Mind Has Conceived (Leuven: Peeters, 2010).Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah, The Human Condition (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958).Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah, The Human Condition, 2nd ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Assmann, Jan, Moses the Egyptian: The Memory of Egypt in Western Monotheism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barad, Karen, Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Barbour, Ian G., Issues in Science and Religion (London: Harper Torchbooks, 1966).Google Scholar
Barbour, Ian G., Myths, Models and Paradigms (New York: Harper and Rowe, 1974).Google Scholar
Barbour, Ian G., Religion in an Age of Science (San Francisco, CA: Harper and Row, 1990).Google Scholar
Barbour, Ian G., Religion and Science: Historical and Contemporary Issues (San Francisco, CA: Harper, 1997).Google Scholar
Barfield, Owen, Saving the Appearances: A Study in Idolatry (New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1972).Google Scholar
Barton, Ruth, ‘“An Influential Set of Chaps:” The X-Club and Royal Society Politics, 1864–85’, British Journal for the History of Science, 23 (1990), 53–81.Google Scholar
Barton, Ruth, ‘“Men of Science”: Language, Identity and Professionalization in the Mid-Victorian Scientific Community’, History of Science, 41 (2003), 73–119.Google Scholar
Bebbington, D. W., ‘Henry Drummond’, in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. https://doi-org.ezproxy.library.yorku.ca/10.1093/ref:odnb/8068.Google Scholar
Bedford, R. D., The Defence of Truth: Herbert of Cherbury and the Seventeenth Century (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Bellantone, Andrea, La Métaphysique possible (Paris: Hermann, 2012).Google Scholar
Benz, Ernst, The Theology of Electricity, tr. Taraba, Wolfgang (Eugener: Wipf and Stock, 1989).Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri, Durée et simultanéité (Paris: PUF, 2009).Google Scholar
Berman, Morris, The Reenchantment of the World (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Bobik, Joseph, Aquinas on Matter and Form and the Elements: A Translation and Interpretation of the De Principiis Naturae and the De Mixtione Elementorun of St. Thomas Aquinas (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohm, David, Wholeness and Implicate Order (London: Routledge, 1980).Google Scholar
Boner, Patrick J., Kepler’s Cosmological Synthesis: Astrology, Mechnaism and the Soul (Leiden: Brill, 2013).Google Scholar
Bos, A. P., Cosmic and Meta-Cosmic Theology in Aristotle’s Lost Dialogues (Leiden: Brill, 1989).Google Scholar
Boulnois, Olivier, Métaphysiques rebelles: Gènese et structures d’une science au Moyen Ăge (Paris: PUF, 2013).Google Scholar
Brague, Rémi, Aristote et la question du monde (Paris: PUF, 1988).Google Scholar
Brightman, Edgar, ‘An Empirical Approach to God’, The Philosophical Review, 46 (1937), 157–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooke, John Hedley, Science and Religion: Some Historical Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Brown, James Robert, The Rational and the Social (London: Routledge, 1989).Google Scholar
Bucklow, Spike, The Alchemy of Paint: Art, Science and Secrets from the Middle Ages (London: Marion Boyars, 2009).Google Scholar
Bucklow, Spike, The Riddle of the Image (London: Reaktion, 2014).Google Scholar
Burton, Simon J. G., ‘“Squaring the Circle”: Cusan Metaphysics and the Pansophic Vision of Jan Amos Comenius’, in Burton, et al. (eds.), Nicholas of Cusa and the Making of the Early Modern World (Leiden: Brill, 2019), 417–49.Google Scholar
Burtt, E. A., The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Science [1925] (New York: Anchor Books, 1954).Google Scholar
Carlisle, Clare, ‘Between Freedom and Necessity: Felix Ravaisson on Habit and the Moral Life’, Inquiry, 53 (2010), 126–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlisle, Clare, On Habit (London: Routledge, 2014).Google Scholar
Carruthers, Mary, The Craft of Thought: Meditation, Rhetoric and the Making of Images, 400–1200 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy, Nature, the Artful Modeller: Lectures on Laws, Science, How Nature Arranges the World and How We Can Arrange It Better (Chicago: Open Court, 2019).Google Scholar
Cashdollar, Charles D., The Transformation of Theology, 1830–1890: Positivism and Protestant Thought in Britain and America (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Cavanaugh, William T., The Myth of Religious Violence (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Cennini, Cennino, The Craftsman’s Handbook, tr. Thompson, D. V. (New York: Dover, 1960).Google Scholar
Chenu, Marie-Dominique, Nature, Man, and Society in the Twelfth Century (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Clines, David A., et al. (eds.), World Biblical Commentary: 18A Job 21–37 (Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 2006).Google Scholar
Copenhaver, Brain P., Magic in Western Culture: From Antiquity to the Enlightenment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copenhaver, Brain P., and Schmitt, Charles B., Renaissance Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Courtenay, W. J., ‘The Critique on Natural Causality in the Mutakallimun and Nominalism’, The Harvard Theological Review, 66 (1973), 77–94.Google Scholar
Courtenay, W. J., ‘Necessity and Freedom in Anselm’s Conception of God’, Analecta Anselmiana, 4, no. 2 (1975), 39–64.Google Scholar
Coyne, Jerry, Faith versus Fact: Why Science and Religion Are Not Compatible (New York: Viking Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Crombie, A. C., Robert Grosseteste and the Origins of Experimental Science 1100–1700 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1953).Google Scholar
Crouzel, Henri, Origène et Plotin: Comparaisons doctrinales (Paris: Téqui, 1991).Google Scholar
Crouzel, Henri (ed.), Remerciement à Origène, suivi de la Lettre d’Origène a Grégoire (Paris: Cerf, 1976).Google Scholar
Cunningham, Andrew, ‘Getting the Game Right: Some Plain Words on the Identity and Invention of Science’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 19 (1988), 365–89.Google Scholar
Cunningham, Andrew, ‘How the Principia Got Its Name: or, Taking Natural Philosophy Seriously’, History of Science, 28 (1991), 377–92.Google Scholar
Cunningham, Andrew, ‘The Identity of Natural Philosophy’, Early Science and Medicine, 5 (2000), 259–78.Google Scholar
Cunningham, Conor, Darwin’s Pious Idea: Why the Ultra-Darwinists and Creationists Both Get It Wrong (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2011).Google Scholar
Cushing, James T., Philosophical Concepts in Physics: The Historical Relation between Philosophy and Scientific Theories (Cambridge: Cambridge Press, 2000).Google Scholar
D’Agostino, Fred, ‘Verballed? Incommensurability 50 Years On’, Synthese, 191 (2013), 517–38.Google Scholar
Daley, Brain E., ‘Origen’s “De Principiis”: A Guide to the Principles of Christian Scriptural Interpretation’, in Petruccione, John (ed.), Nova et Vetera: Patristic Studies in Honor of Thomas Patrick Halton (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1998), 3–21.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine, and Sibum, H. Otto, ‘Scientific Personae and Their Histories’, Science in Context, 16 (2003), 1–8.Google Scholar
Davidson, D., ‘The Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme’, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 47 (1973), 5–20.Google Scholar
Davie, George, The Scotch Metaphysics: A Century of Enlightenment in Scotland [1952] (London: Routledge, 2001).Google Scholar
Dawson, Gowan, and Lightman, Bernard, ‘Introduction’, in Dawson, Gowan and Lightman, Bernard (eds.), Victorian Scientific Naturalism: Community, Identity, Continuity (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Dawson, Gowan, and Lightman, Bernard (eds.), Victorian Scientific Naturalism: Community, Identity, Continuity (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2014).Google Scholar
de Certeau, Michel, The Mystic Fable, tr. Smith, Michael (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992).Google Scholar
de Lubac, Henri, La Posterité spirituelle de Joachim de Flore (Paris: Cerf, 2014).Google Scholar
de Lubac, Henri, Scripture in the Tradition, tr. O’Neill, Luke (Chicago: Crossroad, 2001).Google Scholar
de Munck, Bert, ‘Artisans, Productions and Gifts: Rethinking the History of Material Culture in Early Modern Europe’, Past and Present, 224 (2014), 63.Google Scholar
De Vries, Paul, ‘Naturalism in the Natural Sciences’, Christian Scholar’s Review, 15 (1986), 388–96.Google Scholar
Dear, Peter, The Intelligibility of Nature (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Dear, Peter, ‘Religion, Science, and Natural Philosophy: Thoughts on Cunningham’s Thesis’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 32 (2001), 377–86.Google Scholar
Dear, Peter, ‘What Is the History of Science the History Of?’, Isis, 96 (2005), 390–406.Google Scholar
Dear, Peter, Discipline and Experience: The Mathematical Way in the Scientific Revolution (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dear, Peter, Mersenne and the Learning of the Schools (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeMarrais, Elizabeth, and Robb, John, ‘Art Makes Society’, World Art, 3, no. 1 (2013), 3–22.Google Scholar
Deneen, Patrick, Why Liberalism Failed (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Depew, David J., and Weber, Bruce H., Darwinism Evolving: Systems Dynamics and the Genealogy of Natural Selection (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Desmond, Adrian, Huxley: From Devil’s Disciple to Evolution’s High Priest (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1997).Google Scholar
Desmond, William, The Intimate Strangeness of Being: Metaphysics after Dialectic (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Desmond, William, The Voiding of Being: The Doing and Undoing of Metaphysics in Modernity (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2019).Google Scholar
d’Espagnat, Bernard, On Physics and Philosophy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Dewey, John, Reconstruction in Philosophy (London: Forgotten Books, 2012).Google Scholar
Dinkova-Bruun, Greti, Giles, E. M. Gasper, Michael Huxtable, Tom C. B. McLeish, Cecilia Panti, and Smithson, Hannah, Dimensions of Colour: Robert Grosseteste’s De Colore; Edition, Translation and Interdisciplinary Analysis (Durham, NC: Durham Medieval and Renaissance Texts, 2013).Google Scholar
Dobbs, B. J. T., The Janus Faces of Genius: The Role of Alchemy in Newton’s Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Dolnick, Edward, The Seeds of Life (New York: Basic Books, 2017).Google Scholar
Drury, M. O’C., ‘Notes on Conversations with Wittgenstein’, in Rhees, Rush (ed.), Ludwig Wittgenstein – Personal Recollections (Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield, 1981),Google Scholar
Duhem, Pierre, Le Système du monde. Histoire des doctrines cosmologiques de Platon à Copernic, tomes VII, VIII (Paris: Hermann et Fils, 1956–8).Google Scholar
Dupuy, J.-P., ‘The Narratology of Lay Ethics’, Nanoethics, 4 (2010), 153–70. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckland, Elaine Howard, Science vs Religion: What Scientists Really Think (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckland, Elaine Howard, et al., Secularity and Science: What Scientists around the World Really Think about Religion (New York: Oxford University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Edelheit, Amos, Ficino, Pico and Savanarola: The Evolution of Humanist Theology 1461/2–1498 (Leiden: Brill, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgar, Orion, Things Seen and Unseen (Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2016).Google Scholar
Edwards, Mark J., Origen against Plato (London: Routledge, 2017).Google Scholar
Einstein, Albert, Autobiographical Notes, tr. Schillp, P. A. (Chicago: Open Court, 1979).Google Scholar
Einstein, Albert, and Infeld, Leopold, The Evolution of Physics (London: Cambridge University Press, 1938).Google Scholar
Elliott-Binns, L. E., The Development of English Theology in the Later Nineteenth Century (Hamden: Archon Books, 1971).Google Scholar
Ellis, Fiona, ‘Atheism and Naturalism’, in Carroll, Anthony and Norman, Richard (eds.), Religion and Atheism: Beyond the Divide (London: Routledge, 2017), 72.Google Scholar
England, Richard, ‘Moore, Aubrey Lackington’, in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. https://doi-org.ezproxy.library.yorku.ca/10.1093/ref:odnb/19097.Google Scholar
Faivre, Antoine, Theosophy, Imagination Tradition, tr. Rhone, Christine (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Faivre, Antoine, Western Esotericism: A Concise History, tr. Rhone, Christine (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Ferrera, Christopher A., Liberty, the God That Failed (Tacoma, WA: Angelico Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Ferrier, James, Institutes of Metaphysics: The Theory of Knowing and Being (Edinburgh: Blackwood, 1854).Google Scholar
Feser, Edward, Aristotle’s Revenge: The Metaphysical Foundations of Physical and Biological Science (Neunkirchen-Seelscheid: Editiones Scholasticae, 2019).Google Scholar
Feyerabend, Paul, Against Method (New York: Verso, 1975).Google Scholar
Feyerabend, Paul, Reason, Rationalism and Scientific Method, vol. 1: Philosophical Papers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Fiddes, Paul, Seeing the World and Knowing God (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Fleming, John V., The Dark Side of the Enlightenment: Wizards, Alchemists and Spiritual Seekers in the Age of Reason (New York: W.W. Norton, 2013).Google Scholar
Fleming, R. W., and Bülthoff, H. H., ‘Low-Level Image Cues in the Perception of Translucent Materials’, ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 2 (2005), 346–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel, The History of Sexuality, vol. 3: The Care of the Self, tr. Hurley, Robert (New York: Vintage, 1986).Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, Technologies of the Self (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Freeman, R. B., The Works of Charles Darwin: An Annotated Bibliographical Handlist (London: Dawsons of Pall Mall, 1965).Google Scholar
Fuller, Peter, Theoria: Art in the Absence of Grace (London: Chatto & Windus, 1988).Google Scholar
Funkenstein, Amos, ‘The Disenchantment of Knowledge: The Emergence of the Ideal of Open Knowledge in Ancient Israel and in Classical Greece’, Aleph: Historical Studies in Science and Judaism 3 (2003), 15–81.Google Scholar
Funkenstein, Amos, Theology and the Scientific Imagination (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Philosophical Hermeneutics, 2nd ed., tr. and ed. Linge, D. E. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Truth and Method (London: Continuum, 1975).Google Scholar
Garfield, J. L., and Priest, Graham, ‘Nāgārjuna and the Limits of Thought’, Philosophy East and West 53 (2003), 1–21.Google Scholar
Gascoigne, John, ‘Ideas of Nature: Natural Philosophy’, in Porter, Roy (ed.), The Cambridge History of Science, vol. 4 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 285–304.Google Scholar
Gasper, Giles, ‘The Fulfillment of Science: Nature, Creation and Man in the Hexaemeron of Robert Grosseteste’, in Cunningham, Jack and Hocknull, Mark (eds.), Grosseteste and the Pursuit of Religious and Scientific Learning in the Middle Ages (Cham: Springer, 2016), 221-42.Google Scholar
Gatti, Hilary, Giordano Bruno and Renaissance Science (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Gaukroger, Stephen, Civilization and the Culture of Science: Science and the Shaping of Modernity 1795–1935 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Gaukroger, Stephen, The Collapse of Mechanism and the Rise of Sensibility: Science and the Shaping of Modernity 1680–1760 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Gaukroger, Stephen, The Emergence of a Scientific Culture: Science and the Shaping of Modernity 1210–1685 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Gaukroger, Stephen, The Failures of Philosophy: A Historical Essay (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Gaukroger, Stephen, Francis Bacon and the Transformation of Early-Modern Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford, The Interpretation of Culture (New York: Basic Books, 1973).Google Scholar
Gell, Alfred, Art and Agency (Oxford: Clarendon, 2013).Google Scholar
Gibson, James, Ecological Approach to Visual Perception (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1979).Google Scholar
Giedymin, J., ‘The Paradox of Meaning Invariance’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 21 (1970), 257–68.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Michael Allen, The Theological Origins of Modernity (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Gilson, Etienne, Christian Philosophy in the Middle Ages (London: Sheed and Ward, 1955).Google Scholar
Gingras, Yves, Science and Religion: An Impossible Dialogue, tr. Keating, Peter (Cambridge: Polity, 2017).Google Scholar
Ginzburg, Carlo, ‘Morelli, Freud and Sherlock Holmes’, History Workshop, 9 (1980), 5–36.Google Scholar
Gouhier, Henri, Les premièr pensées de Descartes: Contribution à l’histoire de l’anti-renaissance (Paris: Vrin, 1979).Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay, Rock of Ages: Science and Religion in the Fullness of Life (New York: Ballantine Books, 1999).Google Scholar
Grant, Ian Hamilton, ‘Being and Slime: The Mathematics of Protoplasm in Lorenz Oken’s “Physio-Philosophy”’, Collapse 4 (2008), 286–321.Google Scholar
Grattan-Guinness, Ivor, ‘Work for the Hairdressers: The Production of de Prony’s Logarithmic and Trigonometric Tables’, IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, 12 (1990), 178–81.Google Scholar
Gribbin, John, Six Impossible Things: The ‘Quanta of Solace’ and the Mysteries of the Subatomic World (London: Icon, 2019).Google Scholar
Grier, David, ‘Human Computers: The First Pioneers of the Information Age’, Endeavour, 25 (2001), 28–32.Google Scholar
Grier, David, ‘The Math Tables Project: The Reluctant Start of the Computing Era’, IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, 20 (1998), 33–50.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth, ‘Habit Today: Ravaisson, Bergson, Deleuze and Us’, Body and Society, 19 (2013), 220.Google Scholar
Hadot, Pierre, Philosophy as a Way of Life: Spiritual Exercises from Socrates to Foucault, tr. Chase, Michael (Oxford: Blackwell, 1995).Google Scholar
Hadot, Pierre, The Veil of Isis: An Essay on the History of the Idea of Nature, tr. Chase, Michael (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Hadot, Pierre, What Is Ancient Philosophy?, tr. Chase, Michael (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Hadot, Pierre, Wittgenstein et les limites du langage (Paris: Vrin, 2004).Google Scholar
Hanby, Michael, ‘Absolute Pluralism: How the Dictatorship of Relativism Dictates’, Communio (Summer–Fall 2013), 592–76.Google Scholar
Hanby, Michael, Augustine and Modernity (New York: Routledge, 2003).Google Scholar
Hanby, Michael, ‘Saving the Appearances: Creation’s Gift to the Sciences’, Anthropotes 26, no. 1 (2010), 65–96.Google Scholar
Hanby, Michael, No God, No Science: Theology, Cosmology, Biology (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2016).Google Scholar
Hardin, Jeff, Numbers, Ronald L., and Binzley, Ronald A. (eds.), The Warfare between Science and Religion: The Idea That Wouldn’t Die (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Harrison, Peter, The Bible, Protestantism, and the Rise of Natural Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Harrison, Peter, ‘Conflict, Complexity, and Secularization in the History of Science and Religion’, in Lightman, Bernard (ed.), Rethinking History, Science, Religion (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2019), 221–34.Google Scholar
Harrison, Peter, ‘Experimental Religion and Experimental Science in Early Modern England’, Intellectual History Review, 21 (2011), 413–33.Google Scholar
Harrison, Peter, The Fall of Man and the Foundations of Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Harrison, Peter, ‘From Conflict to Dialogue and All the Way Back’, LA Review of Books, December 27, 2017.Google Scholar
Harrison, Peter, ‘Naturalism and the Success of Science’, Religious Studies 56 (2020), 274–91.Google Scholar
Harrison, Peter, ‘Physico-Theology and the Mixed Sciences: The Role of Theology in Early Modern Natural Philosophy’, in Anstey, Peter and Schuster, John (eds.), The Science of Nature in the Seventeenth Century (Dordrecht: Springer, 2005), 165–83.Google Scholar
Harrison, Peter, ‘Religion’ and the Religions in the English Enlightenment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Harrison, Peter, ‘“Science” and “Religion”: Constructing the Boundaries’, Journal of Religion, 86 (2006), 81–106.Google Scholar
Harrison, Peter, The Territories of Science and Religion (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Harrison, Peter, Numbers, Ronald L., and Shank, Michael H. (eds.), Wrestling with Nature: From Omens to Science (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Hart, David, The Experience of God: Being, Consciousness, Bliss (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Hedley, Douglas, and Leech, David, ‘Introduction’, in Hedley, Douglas and Leech, David (eds.), Revisioning Cambridge Platonism: Sources and Legacy (Cham: Springer, 2019), 1–12.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin, ‘The Origin of the Work of Art’, in Basic Writings (New York: Harper, 2008).Google Scholar
Heilbron, John, ‘Natural Philosophy’, in Harrison, Peter, Numbers, Ronald L., and Shank, Michael H. (eds.), Wrestling with Nature (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011), 173–99.Google Scholar
Hermens, Erma, and Wallert, Arie, ‘The Pekstok Papers, Lake Pigments, Prisons and Paint-Mills’, in Hermens, E. (ed.), Looking through Paintings (London: Archetype, 1998), 276–80.Google Scholar
Hesse, Mary, ‘Truth and the Growth of Scientific Knowledge’, PSA, 2 (1976), 261–80.Google Scholar
Hoff, Johannes, Kontingenz, Berührung, Überschreitung: Zur philosophischen Propädutik christlicher Mystik nach Nikolaus von Kues (Freiburg: Karl Alber, 2007).Google Scholar
Hunter, Michael, Boyle: Between God and Science (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Hunter, Michael, Isaac Newton: The Last Sorcerer (London: Fourth Estate, 1997).Google Scholar
Hurd, Elizabeth Shakman, Beyond Religious Freedom (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Jacob, Margaret, The Radical Enlightenment: Pantheists, Freemasons and Republicans (Lafayette, LA: Cornerstone, 2006).Google Scholar
Jaki, Stanley L., The Origin of Science and the Science of Its Origin (Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Jonas, Hans, The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Jonas, Hans, The Phenomenon of Life: Toward a Philosophical Biology (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Jonas, Hans, Philosophical Essays: From Ancient Creed to Technological Man (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1974).Google Scholar
Jones, David, ‘Art and Sacrament’, in Grisewood, Harman (ed.), Epoch and Artist: Selected Writings by David Jones (London: Faber and Faber, 1959), 159.Google Scholar
Joyce, James, Finnegans Wake, ed. Henkes, R.-J., Bindervoet, E., and Fordham, F. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Kelsey, David, Eccentric Existence (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Kiefer, Claus, Quantum Gravity (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Klein, Étienne, Lachièze-Rey, Marc, and Reisinger, Axel, The Quest for Unity: The Adventure of Physics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Klein, Jacob, Greek Mathematical Thought and the Origin of Algebra, tr. Brann, Eva (New York: Dover, 1992).Google Scholar
Knox, Dilwyn, ‘Ficino, Copernicus and Bruno on the Motion of the Earth’, Brunoniana and Campelliana, 5 (1999), 333–66.Google Scholar
Kordig, C. R., ‘The Theory-Ladenness of Observation’, Review of Metaphysics, 24 (1971), 448–84.Google Scholar
Kragh, Helge, Higher Speculations: Grand Theories and Failed Revolutions in Physics and Cosmology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S., ‘Notes on Lakatos’, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1970 (1970), 137–46.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Lafleur, Claude, and Carrier, Joanne, L’Enseignement de la philosophie au XIIIe siècle: Autour du ‘Guide de L’étudiant du Ms Ripoli 109’ (Quebec: Brepols, 1997).Google Scholar
Lakatos, Imre, ‘Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes’, in Lakatos, Imre and Musgrave, Alan (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970), 91–196.Google Scholar
Lakatos, Imre, and Musgrave, A. (eds.) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Lash, Nicholas, The Beginning and End of ‘Religion’ (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno, Facing Gaia: Eight Lectures on the New Climatic Regime, tr. Porter, Catherine (Cambridge: Polity, 2017).Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno, Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno, ‘Visualisation and Cognition: Drawing Things Together’, in Lynch, M. and Woolgar, S. (eds.), Representation in Scientific Activity (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno, We Have Never Been Modern, tr. Porter, Catherine (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Laudan, Larry, ‘A Confutation of Convergent Realism’, Philosophy of Science, 48 (1981), 19–49.Google Scholar
Laudan, Larry, Progress and Its Problems (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Laudan, Rachel, and Laudan, Larry, ‘Dominance and the Disunity of Method’, Philosophy of Science, 56 (1989), 221–37.Google Scholar
Leanza, Sandro, ‘La classificazione dei libri salomonici e i suoi riflessi sulla questione dei rapporti tra Bibbia e scienze profane, da Origene agli scrittori medioevali’, Augustinianum 14 (1974), 651–66.Google Scholar
Legutko, Ryszard, The Demon in Democracy: Totalitarian Temptations in Free Societies (New York: Encounter Books, 2016).Google Scholar
Lenoble, Robert, Histoire de l’idée de nature (Paris: Albin Michel, 1969).Google Scholar
Levitin, Dmitri, Ancient Wisdom in the Age of the New Science: Histories of Philosophy in England, c. 1640–1700 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Lewis, C. S., The Abolition of Man (New York: HarperCollins, 1974).Google Scholar
Lightman, Bernard, ‘Catholics and the Metaphysical Basis of Science’, in Marshall, Catherine, Lightman, Bernard, and England, Robert (eds.), The Metaphysical Society (1869–1880): Intellectual Life in Mid-Victorian England (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019), 252–69.Google Scholar
Lightman, Bernard, ‘Fashioning the Victorian Man of Science: Tyndall’s Shifting Strategies’, Journal of Dialectics of Nature, 38 (2015), 25–38.Google Scholar
Lightman, Bernard, ‘The Theology of Victorian Scientific Naturalists’, in Harrison, Peter and Roberts, Jon H. (eds.), Science without God? Rethinking the History of Scientific Naturalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019), 235–53.Google Scholar
Lindberg, David, and Numbers, Ronald (eds.), God and Nature: Historical Essays on the Encounter between Christianity and Science (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Lindberg, David, and Number, Ronald (eds.), When Science and Christianity Meet (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Livingston, James C., Religious Thought in the Victorian Age: Challenges and Reconceptions (New York: Continuum, 2007).Google Scholar
Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R., Methods and Problems in Greek Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Lollar, Joshua, To See into the Life of Things: The Contemplation of Nature in Maximus the Confessor and His Predecessors (Turnhout: Brepols, 2013).Google Scholar
Long, A. A., and Sedley, D. N. (eds.), The Hellenistic Philosophers, vol. 1: Translations of the Principal Sources with Philosophical Commentary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Lorraine, Daston, and Park, Katherine, Wonders and the Order of Nature (New York: Zone Books, 1998).Google Scholar
Luhrman, Tanya, When God Talks Back (New York: Vintage, 2012).Google Scholar
Macauley, David, Elemental Philosophy (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2010).Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair, ‘Epistemological Crises and Dramatic Narrative’, in The Tasks of Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair, After Virtue, 3rd ed. (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2007).Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair, Three Rival Versions of Moral Enquiry (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Ian M., ‘The ‘Obscurism of Light’: A Theological Study into the Nature of Light (Norwich: Canterbury Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Maier, Anneliese, Die Vorlaüfer Galileis im 14. Jahrhundert, 2nd ed. rev. (Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, 1966).Google Scholar
Maier, Anneliese, Zwischen Philosophie und Mechanik (Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, 1958).Google Scholar
Manent, Pierre, Cours familier de philosophie politique (Paris: Gallimard, 2004).Google Scholar
Marion, Florian, ‘The exaiphnes in the Platonic Tradition: From Kinematics to Dynamics’ (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc, D’Ailleurs, La Révélation (Paris: Grasset, 2020).Google Scholar
Marshall, Catherine, Lightman, Bernard, and England, Richard (eds.), The Metaphysical Society (1869–1880): Intellectual Life in Mid-Victorian England (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Martin, Francis X., Friar, Reformer and Renaissance Scholar: Life and Work of Giles of Viterbo 1569–1532 (Villanova: Augustinian Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Martin, Michael, The Submerged Reality: Sophiology and the Turn to a Poetic Metaphysic (Kettering: Angelico, 2015).Google Scholar
McAllister, Joseph B. The Letter of Thomas Aquinas De Occultis (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1939).Google Scholar
McCarraher, Eugene, The Enchantments of Mammon: How Capitalism Became the Religion of Modernity (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
McEvoy, J., Robert Grosseteste (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
McGilchrist, Ian, The Master and His Emissary (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
McLeish, Tom, Faith and Wisdom in Science (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
McLeish, Tom, The Poetry and Music of Science: Comparing Creativity in Science and Art (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
McLeish, Tom, ‘Soft Matter: An Emergent Interdisciplinary Science of Emergent Entities’, in Gibb, Sophie, Hendry, Robin and Lancaster, Tom (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Emergence (London: Routledge, 2019).Google Scholar
Meillassoux, Quentin, ‘Appendix: Excerpts from Inexistence Divine’, tr. Harman, Graham in Graham Harman, in Quentin Meillassoux: Philosophy in the Making (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2011), 175–238.Google Scholar
Merchant, Carolyn, The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology and the Scientific Revolution (New York: HarperCollins, 1989).Google Scholar
Merchant, Carolyn, ‘The Violence of Impediments: Francis Bacon and the Origins of Experimentation’, Isis, 99 (2008), 731–60.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, Phenomenology of Perception, tr. Smith, C. (New York: Humanities Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Merrifield, Mary, Original Treatises on the Arts of Painting (New York: Dover, 1967), vol. 2.Google Scholar
Midgley, Mary, Myths We Live By (London: Routledge, 2003).Google Scholar
Milbank, Alison, God and the Gothic: Religion, Reality and Romance in the English Literary Tradition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Milbank, John, Beyond Secular Order: The Representation of Being and the Representation of the People (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013).Google Scholar
Milbank, John, ‘The Confession of Time in Augustine’, Maynooth Philosophical Papers, 10 (2020), 5–56.Google Scholar
Milbank, John, ‘The Gift of Ruling: Secularization and Political Authority’, New Blackfriars, 85 (March 2004), 212–38.Google Scholar
Milbank, John, ‘Hume versus Kant: Faith, Reason and Feeling’, Modern Theology, 27 (2011), 276–97.Google Scholar
Milbank, John, ‘Manifestation and Procedure: Trinitarian Metaphysics after Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas’, in Salvioli, Marco (ed.), Tomismo Creativo: Letture Contemporanee del Doctor Communis (Bologna: Edizioni Studio Domenicano, 2015).Google Scholar
Milbank, John, ‘Mathesis and Mathexis: The Post-Nominalist Realism of Nicholas of Cusa’, in Moulin, Isabelle (ed.), Participation et vision de Dieu chez Nicolas de Cues (Paris: Vrin, 2017), 143–70.Google Scholar
Milbank, John, ‘One in Three and Two in One: The Double Coincidence of Opposites in Nicholas of Cusa’ (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Milbank, John, The Religious Dimension in the Thought of Giambattista Vico, 1668–1744, Part I: The Early Metaphysics (Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Milbank, John, Theology and Social Theory (Oxford: Blackwell, 1990).Google Scholar
Milbank, John, ‘Writing and the Order of Learning’, Philosophy, Theology and the Sciences, 4 (2017), 46–73.Google Scholar
Milbank, John, and Pickstock, Catherine, Truth in Aquinas (London: Routledge, 2001).Google Scholar
Monod, Paul Kléber, Solomon’s Secret Arts: The Occult in the Age of the Enlightenment (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Moore, James R., The Post-Darwinian Controversies: A Study of the Protestant Struggle to Come to Terms with Darwin in Great Britain and America 1870–1900 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Morris, Simon Conway, Life’s Solution: Inevitable Humans in a Lonely Universe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Morrison, Margaret, Unifying Scientific Theories: Physical Concepts and Mathematical Structures (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Morton, Timothy, Realist Magic Objects, Ontology, Causality (London: Open Humanities, 2013).Google Scholar
Moss, Lenny, What Genes Can’t Do (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Muirhead, J. H., The Platonic Tradition in Anglo-Saxon Philosophy: Studies in the History of Idealism in England and America [1931] (London: Routledge, 2018).Google Scholar
Murphy, Nancey C., On the Moral Nature of the Universe: Theology, Cosmology, and Ethics (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Murphy, Nancey C., ‘Religion, Theology, and the Philosophy of Science: An Appreciation of the Work of Ian Barbour’, Theology and Science, 15 (2017), 42–52. Google Scholar
Murphy, Nancy C., Theology in the Age of Scientific Reasoning (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Muslow, Martin, Frühneuzeitliche Selbsterhaltung: Telesio und die Naturphilosophie der Renaissance (Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 1998).Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas, Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas, ‘The Sleep of Reason’, The New Republic (October 12, 1998), 32–8.Google Scholar
Newman, William R., and Principe, Lawrence M., Alchemy Tried in the Fire: Starkey, Boyle and the Fate of Helmontian Chemistry (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Newton-Smith, W. H., The Rationality of Science (Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1981).Google Scholar
Nongbri, Brent, Before Religion: The History of a Modern Concept (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Numbers, Ronald L. (ed.), Galileo Goes to Jail and Other Myths about Science and Religion (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Numbers, Ronald L., ‘Simplifying Complexity: Patterns in the History of Science and Religion’, in Dixon, Thomas, Cantor, Geoffrey, and Pumfrey, Stephen (eds.), Science and Religion: New Historical Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), 500–39.Google Scholar
Oliver, Simon, ‘Aquinas and Aristotle’s Teleology’, Nova et Vetera, 11 (2013), 849–70.Google Scholar
Oliver, Simon, Philosophy, God and Motion (London: Routledge, 2005).Google Scholar
Oliver, Simon, ‘The Sweet Delight of Virtue and Grace in Aquinas’s Ethics’, International Journal of Systematic Theology, 7 (2005), 52–71.Google Scholar
Ong, Walter, Ramus: Method and the Decay of Dialogue (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Oosterhoff, Richard J., ‘Cusanus and Boethian Theology in the Early French Reform’, in Hollmann, Joshua, Burton, Simon J. G., and Parker, Eric M. (eds.), Nicholas of Cusa and the Making of the Modern World (Leiden: Brill, 2019), 339–66.Google Scholar
Oosterhoff, Richard J., Making Mathematical Culture: University and Print in the Circle of Lefèvre D’Étaples (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Osler, Margaret J., ‘Mixing Metaphors: Science and Religion or Natural Philosophy and Theology in Early Modern Europe’, History of Science, 35 (1997), 91–113.Google Scholar
Otten, Willemien, Thinking Nature and the Nature of Thinking: From Eriugena to Emerson (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Parsons, K. P., ‘A Criterion for Meaning Change’, Philosophical Studies, 28 (1975), 367–96.Google Scholar
Peacocke, Arthur, Creation and the World of Science, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Peels, Rik, ‘A Conceptual Map of Scientism’, in de Ridder, Jeroen, Peels, Rik, and van Woudenberg, Rene (eds.), Scientism: Prospects and Problems (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Perl, Eric, Thinking Being: Introduction to Metaphysics in the Classical Tradition (Leiden: Brill, 2014).Google Scholar
Pickering, Andrew, The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Pickstock, Catherine, After Writing (Oxford: Blackwell, 1998).Google Scholar
Pickstock, Catherine, ‘Music: Soul, City and Cosmos after Augustine’, in Milbank, John, Pickstock, Catherine, and Ward, Graham (eds.), Radical Orthodoxy: A New Theology (London: Routledge, 1999), 243–78.Google Scholar
Pieper, Josef, Leisure, the Basis of Culture, tr. Dru, A. (London: Faber and Faber, 1952).Google Scholar
Pigliucci, Massimo, ‘New Atheism and the Scientistic Turn in the Atheism Movement’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 37 (2013), 142–53.Google Scholar
Pinch, Trevor J., ‘Opening Black Boxes: Science, Technology and Society’, Social Studies of Science, 22 (1992), 487–510.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin, ‘Methodological Naturalism’, Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith, 49 (1997), 143–54.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Michael, ‘Faith and Reason’, Journal of Religion, 41 (1961), 237–41.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Michael, ‘Life Transcending Physics and Chemistry’, Chemical and Engineering News, 45 (1967), 54–69.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Michael, Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1974).Google Scholar
Polanyi, Michael, The Tacit Dimension (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1966).Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, John, One World: The Interaction of Science and Theology (Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, John, Rochester Roundabout (Essex: Longman, 1985).Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, John, Science and Theology: An Introduction (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H., The Third Force in Seventeenth-Century Thought (Leiden: Brill, 1991).Google Scholar
Priest, Graham, One: Being an Investigation into the Unity of Reality and Its Parts, Including the Singular Object Which Is Nothingness (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Putallaz, François-Xavier, Insolente liberté: Controverses et condemnations au XIIIe siècle (Paris: Cerf, 1995).Google Scholar
Radford, Tim, The Consolations of Physics (London: Sceptre, 2018).Google Scholar
Ramelli, I., ‘Alexander of Aphrodisias: A Source of Origen’s Philosophy?’, Philosophie Antique: Problèmes, Renaissances, Usages, 14 (2014), 243–46.Google Scholar
Ratzinger, Joseph, Introduction to Christianity, tr. Foster, J. R. (San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Ravaisson, Félix, Of Habit, tr. Carlisle, Clare and Sinclair, Mark (London: Continuum, 2008).Google Scholar
Raymond, Tallis, and Williams, Rowan, ‘Science, Stories and the Self: A Conversation between Raymond Tallis and Rowan Williams’, in Carroll, Anthony and Norman, Richard (eds.), Religion and Atheism: Beyond the Divide (London: Routledge, 2017), 3–25.Google Scholar
Reardon, Bernard M. G., From Coleridge to Gore: A Century of Religious Thought in Britain (London: Longman Group, 1971).Google Scholar
Redondi, Pietro, ‘From Galileo to Augustine’, in Machamer, Peter (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Galileo (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Rée, Jonathan, ‘Atheism and History’, in Carroll, Anthony and Norman, Richard (eds.), Religion and Atheism: Beyond the Divide (London: Routledge, 2017).Google Scholar
Reeves, Josh, ‘After Lakatos’, Theology and Science, 9 (2011), 395–409.Google Scholar
Reeves, Josh, Against Methodology in Science and Religion (London: Routledge, 2020).Google Scholar
Reidy, Michael S., and Lightman, Bernard (eds.), The Age of Scientific Naturalism: Tyndall and His Contemporaries (London: Pickering and Chatto, 2014).Google Scholar
Richards, Robert J., ‘Darwin’s Romantic Biology: The Foundation of His Evolutionary Ethics’, in Mainschien, J. and Ruse, M. (eds.), Biology and the Foundations of Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), 113–53.Google Scholar
Richie, Sara Lane, ‘Integrated Physicality and the Absence of God: Spiritual Technologies in Theological Context’, Modern Theology, 37 (2021), 296–315.Google Scholar
Riskin, Jessica, The Restless Clock: A History of the Centuries-Long Argument over What Makes Living Things Tick (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Rosemann, Phillip W., The Story of a Great Medieval Book: Peter Lombard’s Sentences (Peterborough: Broadview, 2007).Google Scholar
Rosenstock, Bruce, Transfinite Life: Oskar Goldberg and the Vitalist Imagination (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Ross, Sydney, ‘Scientist: The Story of a Word’, Annals of Science, 18 (1962), 65–85.Google Scholar
Rossi, Paolo, The Birth of Modern Science (Oxford: Blackwell, 2001).Google Scholar
Roux, Sophie, ‘Forms of Mathematization’, Early Science and Medicine 15 (2010), 319–37.Google Scholar
Rovelli, Carlo, Reality Is Not What It Seems: The Journey to Quantum Gravity (London: Penguin, 2017).Google Scholar
Rovelli, Carlo, Seven Brief Lessons on Physics, tr. Carnell, Simon and Segre, Erica (London: Penguin, 2015).Google Scholar
Russell, Robert J., Cosmology: From Alpha to Omega: The Creative Mutual Interaction of Theology and Science, Theology and the Sciences (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Sagan, Carl, Cosmos (London: Random House, 2002).Google Scholar
Satran, David, In the Image of Origen: Eros, Virtue and Constraint in the Early Christian Academy (Oakland: University of California Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Scarry, Elaine, On Beauty and Being Just (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Schaffer, Simon, ‘Astronomers Mark Time: Discipline and the Personal Equation’, Science in Context, 2 (1988), 115–45.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Simon, ‘Glass Works: Newton’s Prisms and the Uses of Experiment’, in Gooding, D. et al. (eds.), The Uses of Experiment: Studies in the Natural Sciences (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), 67–104.Google Scholar
Schindler, D. C., The Catholicity of Reason (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2013).Google Scholar
Schindler, D. C., ‘The First First Philosophy’, Recherches Philosophiques, 8 (2018), 101–16.Google Scholar
Schindler, D. C., Freedom from Reality: The Diabolical Character of Modern Liberty (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2017), 151–275.Google Scholar
Schindler, D. C., ‘Liberalism, Religious Freedom, and the Common Good: The Totalitarian Logic of Self-Limitation’, Communio: International Catholic Review, 40 (2013), 577–615.Google Scholar
Schindler, D. C., ‘On the Universality of the University: A Response to Jean-Luc Marion’, Communio: International Catholic Review (Spring 2013): 77–99.Google Scholar
Schindler, D. C., The Perfection of Freedom: Schiller, Schelling, and Hegel between the Ancients and the Moderns (Eugene, OR: Cascade Books, 2012).Google Scholar
Schindler, David L., ‘The Gift as Given: Creation and Disciplinary Abstraction in Science’, Communio: International Catholic Review, 38 (2011), 52–102.Google Scholar
Schindler, David L. ‘The Meaning of the Human in a Technological Age’, Anthropotes, 15 (1999), 31–51.Google Scholar
Schmitz, Kenneth, ‘Postmodern or Modern-Plus?’, Communio: International Catholic Review (1990), 152–66.Google Scholar
Searle, John, Minds, Brains and Science, reprint ed. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Seigel, Harvey, Relativism Refuted: A Critique of Contemporary Epistemological Relativism (Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1987).Google Scholar
Sennett, Richard, The Craftsman (London: Penguin, 2008).Google Scholar
Shagan, Ethan H., The Birth of Modern Belief and Judgement from the Middle Ages to Enlightenment (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven, The Scientific Life: A Moral History of a Late Modern Vocation (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven, and Schaffer, Simon, Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the Experimental Life (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Shaw, Gregory, Theurgy and the Soul: The Neoplatonism of Iamblichus (Kettering: Angelico, 2014).Google Scholar
Sheldrake, Rupert, A New Science of Life (London: Icon, 2009).Google Scholar
Shepherd, Philip, New Self, New World (Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books, 2010).Google Scholar
Siddall, Ruth, ‘Mineral Pigments in Archaeology’, Minerals, 8 (2018), 1–35.Google Scholar
Siebens, Peterson, and Siebens, Anne, ‘Matter in Biology: An Aristotelian Metaphysics for Contemporary Homology’, American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 92 (2018), 353–71.Google Scholar
Silva, Ignacio, ‘A Cause among Causes: God Acting in the Natural World’, European Journal for the Philosophy of Religion, 7 (2015), 99–114.Google Scholar
Silva, Ignacio, ‘Revisiting Aquinas on Providence and Rising to the Challenge of Divine Action in Nature’, The Journal of Religion, 94 (2014), 277–91.Google Scholar
Simpson, William M. R., Koons, Robert C., and Teh, Nicholas J. (eds.), Neo-Aristotelian Perspectives on Contemporary Science (London: Routledge, 2017).Google Scholar
Smith, Wilfred Cantwell, The Meaning and End of Religion (London: SPCK, 1978).Google Scholar
Smith, Wolfgang, The Wisdom of Ancient Cosmology: Contemporary Science in the Light of Tradition (Oakton, VA: Foundation for Traditional Studies, 2003).Google Scholar
Smithson, Hannah E., et al., ‘Color-Coordinate System from a 13th Century Account of Rainbows’, Journal of the Optical Society of America, 31 (2014), A341–A349.Google Scholar
Smolin, Lee, Time Reborn: From the Crisis in Physics to the Future of the Universe (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2013).Google Scholar
Soskice, Janet Martin, Metaphor and Religious Language (Oxford: Clarendon, 1985).Google Scholar
Soulez, Antonia, ‘Conversion in Philosophy: Wittgenstein’s “Saving Word”’, Hypatia, 15 (2000), 127–50.Google Scholar
Southern, R. W., Robert Grosseteste: The Growth of an English Mind in Medieval Europe (Oxford: Clarendon, 1992),Google Scholar
Spaemann, Robert, ‘The End of Modernity?’, in Schindler, D. C. and Schindler, Jeanne Heffernan (eds.), A Robert Spaemann Reader: Philosophical Essays on Nature, God, and the Human Person (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), 211–29.Google Scholar
Spaemann, Robert, ‘Nature’, in Schindler, D. C. and Schindler, Jeanne Heffernan (eds.), A Robert Spaemann Reader: Philosophical Essays on Nature, God, and the Human Person (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), 22–36.Google Scholar
Spaemann, Robert, Persons: The Difference between ‘Someone’ and ‘Something’ (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Spaemann, Robert, ‘The Unrelinquishability of Teleology’, in González, Ana Marta (ed.), Contemporary Perspectives on Natural Law: Natural Law as a Limiting Concept (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008).Google Scholar
Spaemann, Robert, ‘What Does It Mean to Say That “Art Imitates Nature?”’, in Schindler, D. C. and Schindler, Jeanne Heffernan (eds.), A Robert Spaemann Reader: Philosophical Essays on Nature, God, and the Human Person (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), 192–210.Google Scholar
Speer, Andreas, ‘The Division of Metaphysical Discourses: Boethius, Thomas Aquinas and Meister Eckhart’, in Emery, Kent Jr (ed.), Philosophy and Theology in the Long Middle Ages (Leiden: Brill, 2011), 91–115.Google Scholar
Speer, Andreas, ‘The Hidden Heritage: Boethian Metaphysics and Its Medieval Tradition’, Quaestio, 5 (2005), 163–81.Google Scholar
Stanford, Kyle P., ‘An Antirealist Explanation for the Success of Science’, Philosophy of Science, 67 (2002), 266–84.Google Scholar
Stengers, Isabelle, Another Science Is Possible: A Manifesto for Slow Science, tr. Muecke, Stephen (Cambridge: Polity, 2018).Google Scholar
Stengers, Isabelle, The Invention of Modern Science, tr. Smith, Daniel W. (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Stenmark, Mikael, How to Relate Science and Religion: A Multidimensional Model (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2004).Google Scholar
Stenmark, Mikael, Scientism: Science, Ethics, and Religion (London: Routledge, 2001).Google Scholar
Stiegler, Bernard, Technics and Time I: The Fault of Epimetheus, tr. Beardsworth, Richard and Collins, George (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Stock, Brian, Myth and Science in the Twelfth Century: A Study of Bernard Silvester (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1972).Google Scholar
Stock, Gregory, Redesigning Humans: Our Inevitable Genetic Future (New York: Houghton Mifflin, 2002).Google Scholar
Strawson, Galen, ‘Realistic Monism’, in Strawson, et al. (eds.), Consciousness and Its Place in Nature: Does Physicalism Entail Panpsychism? (Exeter: Imprint Academic, 2004), 5.Google Scholar
Strider, Robert E. L., II, Robert Greville, Lord Brooke: Aristocrat, Puritan, Philosopher, Martyr (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1958).Google Scholar
Strong, Edward W., ‘The Relationship between Metaphysics and the Scientific Method in Galileo’s Work’, in McMullin, E. (ed.), Galileo: Man of Science (New York: Basic Books, 1967), 352–64.Google Scholar
Stroumsa, Guy, A New Science: The Discovery of Religion in the Age of Reason (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Suppe, F. (ed.), The Structure of Scientific Theories, 2nd ed. (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Szumilewicz, I., ‘Incommensurability and the Rationality of the Development of Science’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 28 (1977), 345–50.Google Scholar
Tanner, Kathryn, God and Creation in Christian Theology (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 2006).Google Scholar
Tanner, Kathryn, Jesus, Humanity and the Trinity (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 2001).Google Scholar
Tarde, Gabriel, Monadology and Sociology, tr. Lorenc, Theo (Melbourne: re.press, 2012).Google Scholar
Theocharis, T., and Psimopoulos, M., ‘Where Science Has Gone Wrong’, Nature, 329 (1987), 595–8.Google Scholar
Thomassen, Beroald, Metaphysik als Lebensform: Untersuchungen zur Grundlegung der Metaphysik im Metaphysikkommentar Alberts des Grossen (Münster: Aschendorff, 1985).Google Scholar
Thorndike, Lynn, ‘Some Medieval Conceptions of Magic’, The Monist, 25 (1915), 107–39.Google Scholar
Tilling, Chris, ‘Paul, Christ and Narrative Time’, in Torrence, A. B. and McCall, T. H. (eds.), Christ and the Created Order (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2018).Google Scholar
Torrance, Thomas F., The Ground and Grammar of Theology (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1980).Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen, Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Trego, Kristell, L’essence de la liberté: La refondation de l’ethique dans l’oeuvre de saint Anselme de Canturbéry (Paris: Vrin, 2010).Google Scholar
Trigg, Roger, Beyond Matter: Why Science Needs Metaphysics (Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Tuchman, Barbara W., A Distant Mirror: The Calamitous 14th Century (New York: Knopf, 1978).Google Scholar
Turner, Frank Miller, Between Science and Religion: The Reaction to Scientific Naturalism in Late Victorian England (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1974).Google Scholar
Turner, Frank Miller, Contesting Cultural Authority: Essays in Victorian Intellectual Life (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Turner, Frank Miller, ‘The Victorian Conflict between Science and Religion: A Professional Dimension’, Isis, 69 (1987), 356–76.Google Scholar
Tyson, Paul, Returning to Reality: Christian Platonism for Our Times (Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 2014).Google Scholar
Tyson, Paul, Seven Brief Lessons on Magic (Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 2019).Google Scholar
Ulrich, Ferdinand, ‘Das Problem einer “Metaphysik in der Wiederholung”’, Salzburger Jahrbuch für Philosophie 5–6 (1961–2): 263–98.Google Scholar
Ulrich, Ferdinand, Homo Abyssus: The Drama of the Question of Being (Washington, DC: Humanum Academic Press, 2018).Google Scholar
van Asperen de Boer, Jan, ‘An Examination of Particle Size Distribution of Azurite and Natural Ultramarine in Early Netherlandish Paintings’, Studies in Conservation, 19 (1974), 233–43.Google Scholar
van Woudenberg, René, Peels, Rik, and de Ridder, Jeroen, ‘Introduction: Putting Scientism on the Philosophical Agenda’, in van Woudenberg, René, Peels, Rik, and de Ridder, Jeroen (eds.), Scientism: Prospects and Problems (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Veatch, Henry, The Two Logics: The Conflict between Classical and Neo-Analytic Philosophy (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Verfaegh, Sander, The Nature and Development of Quine’s Naturalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Viereck, G. S., Glimpses of the Great (New York: Macauley, 1930).Google Scholar
Waddell, Mark A., Jesuit Science and the End of Nature’s Secrets (London: Ashgate, 2017).Google Scholar
Wallace, William A., ‘The Problem of Causality in Galileo’s Science’, The Review of Metaphysics, 36 (1983), 607–32.Google Scholar
Wallace, William A., ‘Traditional Natural Philosophy’, in Schmitt, Charles and Skinner, Quentin (eds.), The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), 201–35.Google Scholar
Webster, Charles, From Paracelsus to Newton: Magic and the Making of Modern Science (New York: Dover, 2013).Google Scholar
Webster, Charles, Paracelsus: Medicine, Magic and the Mission at the End of Time (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Weeks, Andrew, Paracelsus: Speculative Theory and the Crisis of the Early Reformation (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997).Google Scholar
White, Michael, Isaac Newton: The Last Sorcerer (London: Fourth Estate, 1997).Google Scholar
White, Paul, ‘The Man of Science’, in Lightman, Bernard (ed.), A Companion to the History of Science (Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, 2016), 153–63.Google Scholar
White, Paul, Thomas Huxley: Making the ‘Man of Science’ (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Whitehead, Alfred North, The Concept of Nature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Whitehead, Alfred North, Process and Reality (New York: Free Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Williams, Rowan, Being Human: Bodies, Minds, Persons (London: SPCK, 2018).Google Scholar
Williams, Rowan, The Edge of Words: God and the Habits of Language (London: Bloomsbury, 2014).Google Scholar
Wootton, David, The Invention of Science: A New History of the Scientific Revolution (London: Penguin, 2016).Google Scholar
Wuerger, S. M., Maloney, L. T., and Krauskopf, J., ‘Proximity Judgments in Color Space: Tests of a Euclidean Color Geometry’, Vision Research, 35 (1995), 827–35.Google Scholar
Zachhuber, Johannes, ‘Nature’, in Edwards, Mark J. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Early Christian Philosophy (Oxford: Routledge, 2021), 27–40.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Edited by Peter Harrison, University of Queensland, John Milbank, University of Nottingham
  • Book: After Science and Religion
  • Online publication: 05 May 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009047968.020
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Edited by Peter Harrison, University of Queensland, John Milbank, University of Nottingham
  • Book: After Science and Religion
  • Online publication: 05 May 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009047968.020
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Edited by Peter Harrison, University of Queensland, John Milbank, University of Nottingham
  • Book: After Science and Religion
  • Online publication: 05 May 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009047968.020
Available formats
×