Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-31T10:51:48.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 3 - Perspectives from Germany

from Part I - Original Essays

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2025

By
Harriet I. Flower
Edited by
Amy Russell  and
Hans Beck
Translated by
Kathrin Lüddecke
Amy Russell
Affiliation:
Brown University, Rhode Island
Hans Beck
Affiliation:
Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Germany
Get access

Summary

In a new essay, Harriet I. Flower gives her personal overview of key themes in the German scholarship translated in this volume. German and anglophone scholarship have pursued different paths for reasons including differences in how the boundaries of disciplines are constituted, but also because of the strong influence in Germany of work by Christian Meier which remains untranslated. Three lenses are suggested which can help us categorize this volume’s contributions to the study of Roman political culture: procedures and rules, ritual and spectacle, and the context in the city of Rome.

Keywords

Roman RepublicRoman historyGerman scholarshiphistory of scholarshipRoman politics
Type
Chapter
Information
The Roman Republic and Political Culture
German Scholarship in Translation
 , pp. 71 - 92
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

A Consensus Handbook: Cooperative Decision-Making for Activists, Co-ops and Communities. www.seedsforchange.org.uk.Google Scholar
Astin, A. E. 1967. Scipio Aemilianus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beck, H. 2005. Karriere und Hierarchie: Die römische Aristokratie und die Anfänge des cursus honorum in der mittleren Republik. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleckmann, B. 2002. Die römische Nobilität im ersten punischen Krieg: Untersuchungen zur aristokratischen Konkurrenz in der Republik. Klio-Beihefte 5. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clemente, G. 2017. ‘La politica nella repubblica romana: Attualità di un dibattito storiografico’. Politica antica 7: 139–61.Google Scholar
Dandelion, B. Pink. 2007. An Introduction to Quakerism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davenport, C. 2017. A History of the Roman Equestrian Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, P. J. E. 2017. Architecture and Politics in Republican Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Degelmann, C. 2018. Squalor: Symbolisches Trauern in der politischen Kommunikation der Römischen Republik und frühen Kaiserzeit. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flaig, E. 1995. ‘Die pompa funebris: Adige Konkurrenz und annalistische Erinnerung in der Römischen Republik’, in Oexle, O. G. (ed.), Memoria als Kultur. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 115–48.Google Scholar
Flaig, E. 2003. Ritualisierte Politik: Zeichen, Gesten und Herrschaft im Alten Rom. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. One chapter translated as Chapter 10 in the present volume.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flaig, E. 2015. ‘Prozessionen aus der Tiefe der Zeit: Das Leichenbegängnis des römischen Adels – Rückblick’, in Boschung, D., Hölkeskamp, K.-J., and Sode, C. (eds.), Raum und Performanz: Rituale in Residenzen von der Antike bis 1815. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 99–126.Google Scholar
Flaig, E. 2017. ‘Den Konsens mit dem Volk herstellen: Überlegungen zu den contiones’, in Haake, M. and Harders, A.-C. (eds.), Politische Kultur und soziale Struktur der römischen Republik: Bilanz und Perspektiven. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 517–34.Google Scholar
Flower, H. I. 1996. Ancestor Masks and Aristocratic Power in Roman Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flower, H. I. 2009. ‘Alternatives to Written History in Republican Rome’, in Feldherr, A. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Roman Historians. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flower, H. I. 2014. Consensus and Community in Republican Rome (20th Todd Memorial Lecture). Sydney: University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Gargola, D. 2017. The Shape of the Roman Order: The Republic and its Spaces. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldbeck, F. 2010. Salutationes: Die Morgenbegrüßungen in Rom in der Republik und der frühen Kaiserzeit. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Grafton, A. 2006. ‘Roman Monument: Anthony Grafton Remembers Theodor Mommsen, the Great German Historian of the Roman Republic and Literary Giant of his Day’. History Today 56.9: 48–50.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 1995. ‘Oratoris maxima scaena: Reden vor dem Volk in der politischen Kultur der Republik’, in Jehne, M. (ed.), Demokratie in Rom? Die Rolle des Volkes in der Politik der römischen Republik. Historia Einzelschriften 96. Stuttgart: F. Steiner, 11–49.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 2004a. ‘Krieg, Konkurrenz und Konsens: Die Expansion in Italien und die Entstehung der Nobilität’ (1993), in Hölkeskamp 2004b: 11–48.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 2004b. Senatus populusque Romanus: Die politische Kultur der Republik – Dimensionen und Deutungen. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 2010. Reconstructing the Roman Republic: An Ancient Political Culture and Modern Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 2011a. Die Entstehung der Nobilität: Studien zur sozialen und politischen Geschichte der römischen Republik im 4. Jh. v. Chr., 2nd ed. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner. First published in 1987.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 2011b. ‘What’s in a Text? “Reconstructing the Roman Republic” – Approaches and Aims once Again’. BICS 54.2: 115–24.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 2017. Libera res publica: Die politische Kultur des antiken Rom – Positionen und Perspektiven. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 2020. Roman Republican Reflections: Studies in Politics, Power, and Pageantry. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. and Beck, H. (eds.) 2019. Verlierer und Aussteiger in der ‘Konkurrenz unter Anwesenden’: Agonalität in der politischen Kultur des antiken Rom. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Humphries, M. 2002. ‘In Mommsen’s Shade: Roman Historiography, Past and Present’. Classics Ireland 9: 28–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itgenshorst, T. 2005. Tota illa pompa: Der Triumph in der römischen Republik. Hypomnemata: Untersuchungen zur Antike und ihrem Nachleben 161. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jehne, M. (ed.) 1995. Demokratie in Rom? Die Rolle des Volkes in der Politik der römischen Republik. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Jehne, M. 2020. ‘La culture politique de la République romaine dans la recherche allemande/Die politische Kultur der römischen Republik in der deutschen Forschung’, Trivium 31 (online: http://journals.openedition.org/trivium).Google Scholar
Jehne, M., and Lundgreen, C. (eds.) 2013. Gemeinsinn und Gemeinwohl in der römischen Antike. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linke, B. 1995. Von der Verwandtschaft zum Staat: Die Entstehung politischer Organisationsformen in der frührömischen Geschichte. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Lundgreen, C. 2011. Regelkonflikte in der römischen Republik: Geltung und Gewichtung von Normen in politischen Entscheidungsprozessen. Historia-Einzelschriften 221. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Mignone, L. 2016. The Republican Aventine and Rome’s Social Order. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouritsen, H. 2011. The Freedman in the Roman World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolet, C. 1977–8. Rome et la conquête du monde méditerranéen: 264–27 avant J.-C. 2 vols. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Nicolet, C. 1980. The World of the Citizen in Republican Rome. Translation of the French ed. 1976. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Pfeilschifter, R. 2005. Titus Quinctius Flamininus: Untersuchungen zur römischen Griechenlandpolitik. Hypomnemata 162. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Popkin, M. L. 2016. The Architecture of the Roman Triumph: Monuments, Memory, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raaflaub, K. A. 1996. ‘Born to be Wolves? Origins of Roman Imperialism’, in Wallace, R. R. and Harris, E. M. (eds.), Transitions to Empire: Essays in Greco-Roman History, 360–146 b.c., in Honor of E. Badian (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press), 273–314.Google Scholar
Rich, J. 1993. ‘Fear, Greed and Glory: The Causes of Roman War-making in the Middle Republic’, in Rich, J. and Shipley, G. (eds.), War and Society in the Roman Republic. London: Routledge. 38–68.Google Scholar
Scheidel, W. 2016. ‘Measuring Finley’s Impact’, in: Jew, D., Osborne, R. and Scott, M. (eds.), M. I. Finley: An Ancient Historian and his Impact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 288–97.Google Scholar
Sheeran, M. J. 1996. Beyond Majority Rule: Vote-less Decisions in the Religious Society of Friends. Philadelphia: Pendle Hill.Google Scholar
Susskind, L. S., McKearnan, S., and Thomas-Larmer, J. (eds.) 1999. The Consensus Building Handbook: A Comprehensive Guide to Reaching Agreement. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmer, J. 2017. Vertrauen: Eine Ressource im politischen System der römischen Republik. Campus Historische Studien 74. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
Treggiari, S. 1969. Roman Freedmen during the Late Republic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Walter, U. 2004. Memoria und res publica: Zur Geschichtskultur im republikanischen Rom. Studien zur alten Geschichte 1. Frankfurt am Main: Verlag Antike.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×