Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Crime and CulpabilityA Theory of Criminal Law, pp. 331 - 348Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2009
References
Annotated Code of Maryland, Criminal Law (2007).
Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000).
Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (West 1998).
Arizona v. Henley, 687 P. 2d 1220 (Ariz. 1984).
Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, 535 U.S. 234 (2002).
Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002).
Baltimore & O.R.R. v. Goodman, 275 U.S. 66 (1927).
Berry v. Sugar Notch Borough, 43 A. 240 (Pa. 1899).
Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004).
Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299 (1932).
Brown v. Indiana, 830 N.E.2d 956 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005).
California v. Hamilton, 47 Cal. Rptr. 2d 343 (Cal. Ct. App. 1995).
Code of Alabama (West 1975).
Code of Georgia Annotated (2007).
Connecticut General Statutes Annotated (2007).
California Penal Code (West 1999).
City of Chicago v. Morales, 527 U.S. 41 (1999).
Director of Public Prosecutions for Northern Ireland v. Maxwell, (1978) 3 All E.R. 1140.
Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 579 (1965).
Hawaii Revised Statutes (2006).
Illinois v. Wicks, 823 N.E.2d 1153 (Ill. Ct. App. 2005).
In re Steven S., 31 Cal. Rptr. 644 (1994).
Kansas v. Harris, 162 P. 3d 28 (Kan. 2007).
Kansas v. Neal, 120 P. 3d 366 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005).
Kolender v. Lawson, 461 U.S. 352 (1982).
Ladner v. United States, 358 U.S. 169 (1958).
Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003).
Martin v. Ohio, 480 U.S. 228 (1987).
Maryland Code Annotated (2007).
Mattingly v. United States, 924 F.2d 785 (8th Cir. 1991).
Michigan Compiled Laws Annotated (2007).
Missouri Revised Statutes (2007).
Missouri v. Hunter, 459 U.S. 359 (1983).
Model Penal Code (Official Draft and Revised Comments) (1985).
New Jersey Statutes Annotated (West 2007).
New York Education Law (2001)
New York Penal Law (McKinney1999).
New York Penal Law (2003).
New York Penal Law (2007).
Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Company, 162 N.E. 99 (N.Y. 1928).
Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes Annotated (West 2003).
People v. Anderson, 447 P. 2d 942 (1968).
People v. Decina, 138 N.E.2d 799 (N.Y. 1956).
People v. Dlugash, 363 N.E.2d 1155 (N.Y. 1977).
People v. Luparello, 231 Cal. Rptr. 832 (Cal. Ct. App. 1986).
People v. Myers, 426 N.E.2d 535 (Ill. 1981).
People v. Myers, 816 N.E.2d 820 (Ill. Ct. App. 2004).
People v. Payne, 819 N.E.2d 634 (N.Y. 2004);
People v. Rizzo, 158 N.E. 888, 889 (N.Y. 1927).
People v. Suarez, 844 N.E.2d 721 (N.Y. 2005).
Pokora v. Wabash Ry. Co., 292 U.S. 98 (1934).
Regina v. Smith (David), (1974) 2 Q.B. 354.
Restatement (Third) of Torts: Liability for Physical Harm (Proposed Final Draft No. 1, 2005).
Sanchez-Rengifo v. United States, 815 A.2d 351 (D.C. Ct. App. 2002).
Sandstrom v. Montana, 442 U.S. 510 (1979).
Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories, 607 P. 2d 924 (Cal. 1980).
Smith v. United States, 295 A.2d 60 (D.C. Ct. App. 1972).
State v. LaFreniere, 481 N.W.2d 412 (Neb. 1992).
State v. Stanko, 974 P. 2d 1132 (Mont. 1998).
State v. Williams, 484 P. 2d 1167 (Wash. Ct. App. 1971).
Stephenson v. State, 179 N.E. 633 (Ind. 1932).
Summers v. Tice, 199 P. 2d 1 (Cal. 1948) (en banc).
Terry v. Ohio, 393 U.S. 1 (1968).
Texas Penal Code Annotated (2007).
Thabo Meli v. Regina, (1954) 1 All E.R. 373.
United States Code, title 18, § 1346 (2000).
United States Constitution, Amendment V.
United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual (2005).
United States v. Bergman, 416 F. Supp. 496 (S.D.N.Y. 1976).
United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005).
United States v. Brumley, 116 F.3d 728 (5th Cir. 1997).
United States v. Carroll Towing Co., 159 F.2d. 169 (2d Cir. 1947).
United States v. Czubinski, 106 F.3d 1069 (1st Cir. 1997).
United States v. Dixon, 509 U.S. 688 (1993).
United States v. Incorporated Village of Island Park, 888 F. Supp. 419 (E.D.N.Y. 1995).
United States v. Jewell, 532 F.2d 697 (9th Cir. 1976).
United States v. Johnson, 964 F.2d 124 (1992).
United States v. Mancuso, 42 F.3d 836 (4th Cir. 1994).
United States v. Oviedo, 525 F.2d 881 (5th Cir. 1976).
United States v. Ragen, 314 U.S. 513 (1942).
United States v. Sawyer, 239 F.3d 31 (1st Cir. 2001).
United States v. Whittington, 26 F.3d 456 (4th Cir. 1994).
Village of Sugar Grove v. Rich, 808 N.E.2d 525 (Ill. Ct. App. 2004).
Washington v. Soonalole, 992 P. 2d 541 (Wash. Ct. App. 2000).
Wisconsin v. Rabe, 291 N.W.2d 809 (Wis. 1980).
“A Unified Excuse of Preemptive Self-Protection,” Notre Dame Law Review 74 (1999), 1475–1506.Google Scholar
“Consent, Punishment, and Proportionality,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 15 (1986), 178–182.Google Scholar
“Criminal Liability for Omissions: An Inventory of Issues,” in Criminal Law Theory: Doctrines of the General Part ( and , eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), 121–142.Google Scholar
“The Doomsday Machine: Proportionality, Prevention, and Punishment,” Monist 63 (1980), 199–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Equal Protection and the Prosecution and Conviction of Crime,” University of Chicago Legal Forum (2002), 155–162.Google Scholar
“Foreword: Coleman and Corrective Justice,” Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 15 (1992), 621–636.Google Scholar
“Inculpatory and Exculpatory Mistakes and the Fact/Law Distinction: An Essay in Memory of Myke Bayles,” Law & Philosophy 12 (1993), 33–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Insufficient Concern: A Unified Conception of Criminal Culpability,” California Law Review 88 (2000), 931–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Lesser Evils: A Closer Look at the Paradigmatic Justification,” Law & Philosophy 24 (2005), 611–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“The Philosophy of Criminal Law,” in The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Legal Philosophy ( and , eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), 815–867.Google Scholar
“Reconsidering the Relationship among Voluntary Acts, Strict Liability, and Negligence in Criminal Law,” Social Philosophy & Policy 7 (1990), 84–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Scalar Properties, Binary Judgments,” Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (2008), 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Unknowingly Justified Actors and the Attempt/Success Distinction,” Tulsa Law Review 39 (2004), 851–860.Google Scholar
, and . “Culpable Acts of Risk Creation,” Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 5 (2008), 375–405.Google Scholar
, and . “Mens Rea and Inchoate Crimes,” Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 87 (1997), 1138–1193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . “Deontological Ethics,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (November 21, 2007), available at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-deontological/.
, and . “The Deceptive Nature of Rules,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 142 (1994), 1191–1227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . The Rule of Rules: Morality, Rules and the Dilemmas of Law (Durham: Duke University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Convicting the Morally Blameless: Reassessing the Relationship between Legal and Moral Accountability,” UCLA Law Review 39 (1992), 1511–1623.Google Scholar
“Just Warfare Theory and Noncombatant Immunity,” Cornell International Law Journal 39 (2006), 663–688.Google Scholar
“Mens Rea, Negligence, and Criminal Law Reform,” Law & Philosophy 6 (1987), 53–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Recharging the Jury: The Criminal Jury's Constitutional Role in an Era of Mandatory Sentencing,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 152 (2003), 33–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Principles of Law: A Normative Analysis (Dordrecht: D. Reidel; Norwell: sold and distributed in the U.S.A. and Canada by Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Who Deserves Autonomy, and Whose Autonomy Deserves Respect?” in Personal Autonomy: New Essays in Personal Autonomy and Its Role in Contemporary Moral Philosophy ( ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 310–329.Google Scholar
“Culpable Bystanders, Innocent Threats and the Ethics of Self-Defense,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 35 (2005), 585–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (1781; Buffalo: Prometheus Books, 1988).Google Scholar
“The Right to Be Hurt: Testing the Boundaries of Consent,” George Washington Law Review 75 (2007), 165–236.Google Scholar
“Victims and Perpetrators: An Argument for Comparative Liability in Criminal Law,” Buffalo Criminal Law Review 8 (2005), 385–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Lesser Evils and Justification: A Less Close Look,” Law and Philosophy 24 (2005), 681–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Punishment and Justification,” working paper (December 15, 2006), available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=956610.
, and Alex Stein. “Mediating Rules in Criminal Law,” Virginia Law Review 93 (2007), 1197–1258.Google Scholar
“Punishment for Negligence: A Reply to Professor Hall,” Buffalo Law Review 22 (1972), 107–122.Google Scholar
Intentions, Plans, and Practical Reason (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
“Plain Meaning, Practical Reason, and Culpability: Toward a Theory of Jury Interpretation of Criminal Statutes,” Michigan Law Review 96 (1998), 1199–1268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. “Wrongdoing and Attribution: Implications beyond the Justification-Excuse Distinction,” Wayne Law Review 33 (1987), 1289–1342.Google Scholar
“Punishment Decisions at Conviction: Recognizing the Jury as Fault-Finder,” University of Chicago Legal Forum (2005), 91–148.
“Retributive Justice in the Real World,” Legal Studies Paper No. 77, Brooklyn Law School (2007), available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=996140.
Double-Effect Reasoning: Doing Good and Avoiding Evil (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“The Prosecutor's Dilemma: Bargains and Punishments,” Fordham Law Review 72 (2003), 93–168.Google Scholar
. “Decision Rules and Conduct Rules: On Acoustic Separation in Criminal Law,” Harvard Law Review 97 (1984), 625–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“A Note on Intention and the Doctrine of Double Effect,” Philosophical Studies 134 (2007), 103–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Two Cheers for ‘Closeness’: Terror, Targeting and Double Effect,” Philosophical Studies 137 (2008), 335–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Content and Consciousness (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; New York, Humanities Press, 1969).Google Scholar
“There Is No Door: Finally Solving the Problem of Moral Luck,” Journal of Philosophy 101 (2004), 445–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Double Jeopardy,” Georgetown Law Journal Annual Review of Criminal Procedure 35 (2006), 422–464.Google Scholar
“Battered Women Who Kill Their Sleeping Tormenters: Reflections on Maintaining Respect for Human Life While Killing Moral Monsters,” in Criminal Law Theory: Doctrines of the General Part ( and , eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), 259–282.Google Scholar
“Does One Size Fit All? Thoughts on Alexander's Unified Conception of Criminal Culpability,” California Law Review 88 (2000), 955–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Justifications and Excuses: A Brief Review of the Concepts and the Literature,” Wayne Law Review 33 (1987), 1155–1176.Google Scholar
“Why Keep the Provocation Defense?: Some Reflections on a Difficult Subject,” Minnesota Law Review 86 (2002), 959–1002.Google Scholar
“Toward a Constitutional Law of Crime and Punishment,” Hastings Law Journal 55 (2004), 509–572.Google Scholar
Answering for Crime: Responsibility and Liability in Criminal Law (Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart, (2007).Google Scholar
“Crime, Prohibition, and Punishment,” Journal of Applied Philosophy 19 (2002), 97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“'I Might Be Guilty, But You Can't Try Me': Estoppel and Other Bars to Trial,” Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 1 (2003), 245–260.Google Scholar
Intention, Agency, and Criminal Liability: Philosophy of Action and the Criminal Law (Oxford: Blackwell, 1990).Google Scholar
“Morality without Responsibility,” manuscript on submission (2007), on file with author, University of San Diego School of Law.
“Moral Luck and the Criminal Law,” in Law and Social Justice (, , and , eds., Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2005), 105–124.Google Scholar
“Ends, Means, Side-Effects, and Beyond: A Comment on the Justification of the Use of Force,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law 7 (2005), 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“The Ethics of Punishment,” in Philosophical Perspectives on Punishment (, ed., Albany: State University of New York Press, 1972), xi–xxvi.Google Scholar
Whose Body Is It Anyway?: Justice and the Integrity of the Person (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doing and Deserving: Essays in the Theory of Responsibility (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970).Google Scholar
“Act, Agency, and Indifference: The Foundations of Criminal Responsibility,” New Criminal Law Review 10 (2007), 441–457.Google Scholar
“Clarifying Consent: Peter Westen's The Logic of Consent,” Law & Philosophy 25 (2006), 193–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Defending Imminence: From Battered Women to Iraq,” Arizona Law Review 46 (2004), 213–262.Google Scholar
“Don't Abandon the Model Penal Code Yet! Thinking Through Simons's Rethinking,” Buffalo Criminal Law Review 6 (2002), 185–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Opaque Recklessness,” Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 91 (2001), 597–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Excuses and Dispositions in Criminal Law,” Buffalo Criminal Law Review 6 (2002), 317–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Self-Defense as Rational Excuse,” University of Pittsburgh Law Review 57 (1996), 621–650.Google Scholar
“The Intend/Foresee Distinction and the Problem of ‘Closeness,’ ” Philosophical Studies 128 (2006), 585–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Grammar of Criminal Law: American, Comparative, and International, vol. 1: Foundations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
“The Nature of Justification,” in Action and Value in Criminal Law ( et al., eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993), 175–186.Google Scholar
“The Right Deed for the Wrong Reason: A Reply to Mr. Robinson,” UCLA Law Review 23 (1975), 293–322.Google Scholar
“Should Intolerable Prison Conditions Generate a Justification or an Excuse for Escape?” UCLA Law Review 26 (1979), 1355–1369.Google Scholar
“The Theory of Criminal Negligence: A Comparative Analysis,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 119 (1971), 401–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1987).Google Scholar
“The Case of the Speluncean Explorers,” Harvard Law Review 62 (1949), 616–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and S. Shute. “The Wrongness of Rape,” in Oxford Essays on Jurisprudence (4th ser., , ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), 193–218.Google Scholar
, and Frank Jackson. “Freedom from Fear,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 35 (2007), 249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Virtue, Luck and the Pyrrhonian Problematic,” Philosophical Studies 130 (2006), 9–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lying, Cheating, and Stealing: A Moral Theory of White-Collar Crime (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
“An Epistemic Dimension of Blameworthiness,” Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 57 (1997), 523–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Negligent Behavior Should Be Excluded from Penal Liability,” Columbia Law Review 63 (1963), 632–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“The Collapse of the Harm Principle,” Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 90 (1999), 109–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Punishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy of Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 1968).Google Scholar
Autonomy: An Essay in Philosophical Psychology and Ethics (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Responsibility and Good Reasons,” Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 2 (2005), 471–484.Google Scholar
, “A Rude Awakening: What to Do with the Sleepwalking Defense?” Boston College Law Review 46 (2004), 149–182.Google Scholar
“Is Strict Liability Rape Defensible?” in Defining Crimes: Essays on the Special Part of the Criminal Law ( and , eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 196–217.Google Scholar
“Justification and Excuse, Wrongdoing and Culpability,” Notre Dame Law Review 74 (1999), 1551–1574.Google Scholar
“Does Consequentialism Make Too Many Demands, or None at All?” Ethics 116 (2006), 680–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Guns and Drugs: Case Studies on the Principles Limits of the Criminal Sanction,” Law & Philosophy 23 (2004), 437–493.Google Scholar
“Justifications and the Criminal Liability of Accessories,” Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 80 (1989), 491–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overcriminalization: The Limits of the Criminal Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
“The Sequential Principle of Relative Culpability,” Legal Theory 1 (1995), 493–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . “Willful Ignorance, Knowledge, and the ‘Equal Culpability’ Thesis: A Study of the Deeper Significance of the Principle of Legality,” Wisconsin Law Review (1994), 29–70.
“Rescue without Law: An Empirical Perspective on the Duty to Rescue,” Texas Law Review 84 (2006), 653–738.Google Scholar
, Jr. “Legality, Vagueness, and the Construction of Penal Statutes,” Virginia Law Review 71 (1985), 189–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Reckless Complicity,” Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 87 (1997), 369–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Respect for Life and Regard for Rights in the Criminal Law,” California Law Review 64 (1976), 871–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and , eds. Criminal Law and Its Processes: Cases and Materials (7th ed., Boston: Little, Brown, 2001).
, and . “Two Conceptions of Emotion in Criminal Law,” Columbia Law Review 96 (1996), 269–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Failures of Just War Theory: Terror, Harm, and Justice,” Ethics 114 (2004), 650–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bad Acts and Guilty Minds: Conundrums of the Criminal Law (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Before and After: Temporal Anomalies in Legal Doctrine,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 151 (2003), 863–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Choice, Consent, and Cycling: The Hidden Limitations of Consent,” Michigan Law Review 104 (2006), 627–670.Google Scholar
“Why the Law Is Either/Or,” working paper, on file with authors.
Comment, “The Role of Luck in the Criminal Law,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 142 (1994), 2183–2237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . Essay, “Doing without Speed Limits,” Boston University Law Review 79 (1999), 155–194.Google Scholar
, and . “Strawsonian Variations: Folk Morality and the Search for a Unified Theory,” in The Oxford Handbook of Moral Psychology ( et al., eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming).
Note, “Betraying Honest Services: Theories of Trust and Betrayal Applied to the Mail Fraud Statute and § 1346,” New York University Annual Survey of American Law 61 (2006), 779–822.Google Scholar
Direct and Oblique Intention in the Criminal Law: An Inquiry into Degrees of Blameworthiness (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2002).Google Scholar
“Compatibilism and Contractualism: The Possibility of Moral Responsibility,” Ethics 117 (2006), 7–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“The Solution to the Problem of Outcome Luck: Why Harm Is Just as Punishable as the Wrongful Action That Causes It,” Law & Philosophy 24 (2005), 263–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“No Easy Way Out: Dangerous Offenders and Preventive Detention,” Law & Philosophy 27 (2008), 383–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“A Tempting State: The Political Economy of Entrapment,” Working Paper No. 33, Illinois Law and Economics (2005).
“The Basis of Moral Liability to Defensive Killing,” Philosophical Issues 15 (2005), 386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Ethics of Killing in War: The Oxford Uehiro Lectures, forthcoming, manuscript on file with authors.
“Self-Defense and the Problem of the Innocent Attacker,” Ethics 104 (1994), 252–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Iraq: A Morally Justified Resort to War,” Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (2006), 293–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Aspects of the Theory of Moral Cognition: Investigating Intuitive Knowledge of the Prohibition of Intentional Battery and the Principle of Double Effect,” Georgetown Law and Economics Research Paper, Paper No. 762385 (2002), available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=762385.
“Acceptance: The Missing Mental State,” Southern California Law Review 71 (1998), 953–1036.Google Scholar
“The Morality of Self-Defense: A Reply to Wasserman,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 18 (1989), 81–89.Google Scholar
Monty Python and the Holy Grail (EMI Films, 1975).
Act and Crime: The Philosophy of Action and Its Implications for Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Causation and Responsibility, forthcoming, manuscript on file with authors.
“Foreseeing Harm Opaquely,” in Action and Value in Criminal Law ( et al., eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993), 125–155.Google Scholar
Law and Psychiatry: Rethinking the Relationship (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
“Patrolling the Consequentialist Borders of Our Obligations,” Law & Philosophy 27 (2008), 35–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Placing Blame: A General Theory of Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
“Responsibility and the Unconscious,” Southern California Law Review 53 (1980), 1563–1678.Google Scholar
“Thomson's Preliminaries about Causation and Rights,” Chicago-Kent Law Review 63 (1987), 497–522.Google Scholar
“Ross on Desert and Punishment,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (2006), 231–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Criminal Responsibility and the Disappearing Person,” Cardozo Law Review 28 (2006), 2545–2576.Google Scholar
“Culpability and Control,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 142 (1994), 1587–1660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Diminished Rationality, Diminished Responsibility,” Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 1 (2003), 289–308.Google Scholar
“Equality and Individuation in Punishment,” Law & Philosophy, forthcoming.
“Reasons, Results, and Criminal Responsibility,” University of Illinois Law Review 2004), 363–444.
“Uncontrollable Urges and Irrational People,” Virginia Law Review 88 (2002), 1025–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natural Law in Jurisprudence and Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Contractualism and Aggregation,” Social Theory & Practice 28 (2002), 303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Desert and Punishment for Acts Preparatory to the Commission of a Crime,” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 20 (2007), 113–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“A Critique of Rational Excuse Defense: A Reply to Finkelstein,” University of Pittsburgh Law Review 57 (1996), 651–676.Google Scholar
“Risk, Harm, and Responsibility,” in Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law (, ed., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995), 321–346.Google Scholar
Judging Evil: Rethinking the Law of Murder and Manslaughter (New York: New York University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
“Offsetting Risks,” Olin Working Paper No.316, University of Chicago Law and Economics (2007), available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract_id=946764.
“Are Moral Reasons Morally Overriding?” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11 (2008), 369–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Actions, Intentions, and Consequences: The Doctrine of Double Effect,” in Morality and Action ( and , eds., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), 175–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“The Bomb Thief and the Theory of Justification Defenses,” Criminal Law Forum 8 (1997), 387–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Dissenting View of Commissioner Paul H. Robinson to the Promulgation of Sentencing Guidelines by the United States Sentencing Commission,” Federal Register 52 (1987), 18121–18132.Google Scholar
“Prohibited Risks and Culpable Disregard or Inattentiveness: Challenge and Confusion in the Formulation of Risk-Creation Offenses,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law 4 (2002), 367–396.Google Scholar
“Punishing Dangerousness: Cloaking Preventive Detention as Criminal Justice,” Harvard Law Review 114 (2001), 1429–1456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Structure and Function in Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“A Theory of Justification: Societal Harm as a Prerequisite for Criminal Liability,” UCLA Law Review 23 (1975), 266–292.Google Scholar
, and Michael T. Cahill. “The Accelerating Degradation of Criminal Codes,” Hastings Law Journal 56 (2005), 633–656.Google Scholar
, and . “Can a Model Penal Code Second Save the States from Themselves?” Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 1 (2003), 169–178.Google Scholar
, and . Law without Justice: Why Criminal Law Doesn't Give People What They Deserve (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
, Michael T. Cahill, and Usman Mohammad. “The Five Worst (and Five Best) American Criminal Codes,” Northwestern University Law Review 95 (2000), 1–90.Google Scholar
, and John M. Darley. “Does Criminal Law Deter? A Behavioural Science Investigation,” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 24 (2004), 173–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . Justice, Liability and Blame: Community Views and the Criminal Law (Boulder: Westview Press, 1995).Google Scholar
, and Robert Kurzban. “Concordance and Conflict in Intuitions of Justice,” Minnesota Law Review 91 (2007), 1829–1907.Google Scholar
“New Technology, Old Defenses: Internet Sting Operations and Attempt Liability,” University of Richmond Law Review 38 (2004), 477–524.Google Scholar
“Skepticism about Moral Responsibility,” Philosophical Perspectives 18 (Ethics) (2004), 295–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . “Is Consequential Luck Morally Inconsequential? Empirical Psychology and the Reassessment of Moral Luck,” Ratio 17 (2004), 329–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules,” University of Chicago Law Review 56 (1989), 1175–1188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Retributivism and Desert,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 81 (2000), 189–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Playing by the Rules: A Philosophical Examination of Rule-Based Decision-Making in Law and in Life (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991).Google Scholar
, and . “Regulation by Generalization,” Working Paper No. 05–16, AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies (2005), available at http://ksgnotes1.harvard.edu/Research/wpaper.nsf/rwp/RWP05–048.
Automatism, Insanity, and the Psychology of Criminal Responsibility: A Philosophical Inquiry (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“The Gender Question in Criminal Law,” Social Philosophy & Policy 7 (1990), 105–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. “Moral Address, Moral Responsibility, and the Boundaries of the Moral Community,” Ethics 118 (2007), 70–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and G. R. Sullivan. “On the Nature and Rationale of Property Offenses,” in Defining Crimes: Essays on the Special Part of the Criminal Law ( and , eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 168–195.Google Scholar
, and David E. Aaronson. The Insanity Defense: A Critical Assessment of the Law and Policy in the Post Hinckley Era (New York: Praeger, 1988).Google Scholar
“Culpability and Retributive Theory: The Problem of Criminal Negligence,” Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues 5 (1994), 365–398.Google Scholar
“Does Punishment for ‘Culpable Indifference’ Simply Punish for ‘Bad Character’? Examining the Requisite Connection between Mens Rea and Actus Reus,” Buffalo Criminal Law Review 6 (2002), 219–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Tort Negligence, Cost-Benefit Analysis and Tradeoffs: A Closer Look at the Controversy,” Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, forthcoming.
Minding Justice: Laws That Deprive People with Mental Disability of Life and Liberty (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
“Responsibility for Attitudes: Activity and Passivity in Mental Life,” Ethics 115 (2005), 236–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, et al. Before and After Hinckley: Evaluating Insanity Defense Reform (New York: Guilford Press, 1993).Google Scholar
“Torture – The Case for Dirty Harry and against Alan Dershowitz,” Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (2006), 337–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Yet Another Revised DDE? A Note on David K. Chan's DDED,” Ethical Theory & Moral Practice 9 (2006), 231–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . “Association between Behavior at Age 3 Years and Adult Criminality,” British Journal of Psychiatry 179 (2001), 197–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
“The Impossibility of Moral Responsibility,” Philosophical Studies 75 (1994), 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Freedom and Resentment,” in Free Will (, ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982), 72–93.Google Scholar
“The Pathological Politics of Criminal Law,” Michigan Law Review 100 (2001), 505–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Plea Bargaining and Criminal Law's Disappearing Shadow,” Harvard Law Review 117 (2004), 2548–2569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and Adrian Vermeule. “Is Capital Punishment Morally Required? The Relevance of Life-Life Tradeoffs,” Stanford Law Review 58 (2005), 703–750.Google Scholar
“Self-Defense and Rights,” Lindley Lecture at the University of Kansas (April 5, 1976), reprinted in Judith Jarvis Thomson, Rights, Restitution, and Risk: Essays in Moral Theory (, ed., Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1986), 33–48.Google Scholar
, and Giuliano Torrengo. “Crimes and Punishments,” Philosophia 34 (2006), 395–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Owning Intentions and Moral Responsibility,” Ethical Theory & Moral Practice 8 (2005), 507–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“The Doctrine of Illicit Intentions,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 34 (2006), 39–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Permissibly Encouraging the Impermissible,” Journal of Value Inquiry 38 (2004), 341–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Responsibility and the Moral Sentiments (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
“H. L. A. Hart and the Doctrines of Mens Rea and Criminal Responsibility,” University of Chicago Law Review 35 (1967), 92–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Individualizing the Reasonable Person in Criminal Law,” Criminal Law & Philosophy 2 (2008), 137–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Why Criminal Harm Matters: Plato's Abiding Insight in the Laws,” Criminal Law & Philosophy 1 (2007), 307–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Trying, Acting and Attempted Crimes,” unpublished manuscript, on file with the authors.
“Moral Luck: A Partial Map,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 36 (2006), 585–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Innocence and Complex Threats: Upholding the War Effort and the Condemnation of Terrorism,” Ethics 114 (2004), 734–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar