Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T03:22:30.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2023

Edited by
Frances B. Titchener  and
Alexei V. Zadorojnyi
Frances B. Titchener
Affiliation:
Utah State University
Alexei V. Zadorojnyi
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Companion to Plutarch , pp. 403 - 469
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aalders, G. J. D. (1977) “Political thought in Plutarch’s Convivium Septum Sapientium”, Mnemosyne 30: 28–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aalders, G. J. D. (1982) Plutarch’s Political Thought. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Adam, J. (ed.) (1905) The Republic of Plato. Vol. I. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Affortunati, M. and Scardigli, B. (1992) “La vita ‘plutarchea’ di Annibale: Un’imitazione di Donato Acciaiuoli”, A&R 37: 88–105.Google Scholar
Afzelius, A. (1941) “Die politische Bedeutung des jüngeren Catos”, C&M 4: 100–203.Google Scholar
Aguilar, R. and Alfageme, I. (eds.) (2006) Ecos de Plutarco en Europa: de fortuna Plutarchi studia selecta. Madrid.Google Scholar
Aguilar Perdomo, M. (1999) “La utilización de la Vidas paralelas de Plutarco en el Felixmarte de Hircania: a propósito de su autor, Melchor de Ortega”, Thesaurus: Boletín del Instituto Caro y Cuervo 54: 289–306.Google Scholar
Ahlrichs, B. (2005) Prüfstein der Gemüter: Untersuchungen zu den ethischen Vorstellungen in den Parallelbiographien Plutarchs am Beispiel des Coriolan [Beiträge zur Altertumswissenschaft 16]. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Alcalde Martín, C. (1999) “Rasgos socráticos de la personalidad de Foción en la Vida de Plutarco”, in Pérez Jiménez, García López, and Aguilar (1999), 159–172.Google Scholar
Alcock, S. (2002) Archaeologies of the Greek Past: Landscapes, Monuments, and Memories. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Alden, M. (2005) “Lions in paradise: lion similes in the Iliad and the lion cubs of Il.18.318–22”, CQ 55: 335–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alemán Illán, J. (2005) “Plutarco y Aristóteles en Francisco Cascales: Evolución del concepto de διάνοια en la teoría literaria del Humanismo”, Myrtia 20: 255–264.Google Scholar
Alexander, P. (1940) “Secular biography at Byzantium”, Speculum 15: 194–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexandridis, A., Wild, M., and Winkler-Horaček, L. (eds.) (2008) Mensch und Tier in der Antike: Grenzziehung und Grenzüberschreitung: Symposion vom 7. bis 9. April 2005 in Rostock. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Alexiou, E. (1999) “Zur Darstellung der ὀργή in Plutarchs Bioi”, Philologus 143.1: 101–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexiou, E. (2008) “Eunoia bei Plutarch: von den Praecepta Gerendae Reipublicae zu den Viten”, in Nikolaidis, (2008), 365–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexiou, E. (2010) “Plutarchs Lysander und Alkibiades als ‘Syzygie’”, RhM 153: 323–352.Google Scholar
Alikin, V. (2009) “The reading of texts at the Graeco-Roman symposium and in the Christian gathering”, in Ribeiro Ferreira et al. (2009), 103–112.Google Scholar
Almagor, E. (2005) “Who is a barbarian? The barbarians in the ethnological and cultural taxonomies of Strabo”, in Dueck, D., Lindsay, H., and Pothecary, S. (eds.), Strabo’s Cultural Geography. Cambridge, 42–55.Google Scholar
Almagor, E. (2009) “A ‘barbarian’ symposium and the absence of philanthropia (Artaxerxes 15)”, in Ribeiro Ferreira et al. (2009), 131–146.Google Scholar
Almagor, E. (2009–10) “Characterization through animals: the case of Plutarch’s Artaxerxes”, Ploutarchos 7: 3–22.Google Scholar
Almagor, E. (2013) “‘But this belongs to another discussion’: exploring the ethnographic digressions in Plutarch”, in Almagor, and Skinner, (2013), 153–178.Google Scholar
Almagor, E. (2014a) “Aratus and Artaxerxes”, in Beck, (2014a), 278–291.Google Scholar
Almagor, E. (2014b) “Hold your horses: characterization through animals in Plutarch’s Artaxerxes. Part II”, Ploutarchos 11: 3–18.Google Scholar
Almagor, E. (2016a) “Josephus and Greek imperial literature”, in Chapman, H. and Rodgers, Z. (eds.), A Companion to Josephus. Malden, MA, 108–122.Google Scholar
Almagor, E. (2016b) “Parallel narratives and possible worlds in Plutarch’s Life of Artaxerxes”, in De Temmerman, and Demoen, (2016), Cambridge, 65–79.Google Scholar
Almagor, E. (2017a) “The empire brought back: Persianism in imperial Greek literature”, in Strootman, R. and Versluys, M. (eds.), Persianism in Antiquity. Stuttgart, 327–343.Google Scholar
Almagor, E. (2017b) “Plutarch and the Persians”, Electrum 24: 123–168.Google Scholar
Almagor, E. (2018) Plutarch and the Persica. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Almagor, E. (2019) “Echoes of the Persian Wars in the European Phase of the Roman-Syrian War (with an Emphasis on Plut., Cat. Mai. 12–14)”, in Coşkun, A. A. and Engels, D. (eds.), Rome and the Seleukid East: Selected Papers from Seleukid Study Day V, Brussels, 21–23 August 2015. Brussels, 87–133.Google Scholar
Almagor, E. (2022) “When Hermes enters: towards a typology of the silences of Plutarch’s narrator and their uses in characterization”, in J. Beneker, C. Cooper, N. Humble, and F. B. Titchener (eds.), Plutarch’s Unexpected Silences: Suppression and Selection in the Lives and Moralia. Leiden, 11–35.Google Scholar
Almagor, E. (2023), “Plutarch’s parallelism and resistance”, in D. Jolowicz and J. Elsner (eds.), Articulating Resistance under the Roman Empire, Cambridge, 89–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almagor, E. and Skinner, J. (eds.) (2013) Ancient Ethnography: New Approaches. London.Google Scholar
Alston, R. (1996) “Conquest by text: Juvenal and Plutarch on Egypt”, in Webster, J. and Cooper, N. (eds.), Roman Imperialism: Post-Colonial Perspectives. Leicester, 99–109.Google Scholar
Álvarez Rodríguez, A. (1983) “Las ‘vidas de hombres ilustres’ (Nos. 70–72 de la Bibl. Nac. de París), edición y estudio”, Colección Tesis doctorales; n. 107/83, Departamento de Filología Románica, Facultad de Filología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid.Google Scholar
Álvarez Rodríguez, A. (1984) “Plutarco romanceado en el siglo XIV: suerte e importancia de la traducción aragonesa”, Cuadernos de Filología 4: 143–158.Google Scholar
Alvarez, A. (1985) “Los helenismos en las traducciones de Juan Fernández de Heredia”, Cuadernos de Filología 5: 99–110.Google Scholar
Alvarez, A. (ed.) (2009) Plutarco de Queronea: Vidas semblantes. Versión aragonesa de las Vidas paralelas, patrocinada por Juan Fernández de Heredia. Vols. I–II. Zaragoza.Google Scholar
Amyot, J. (1559) Plutarque: les vies des hommes illustres. 2 vols. Paris.Google Scholar
Amyot, J. (1565) Les vies des hommes illustres, Grecs et Romans, comparées l’une avec l’autre par Plutarque de Cheronee. Paris.Google Scholar
Amyot, J. (1572) Plutarque oeuvres morales et meslees. 2 vols. Paris.Google Scholar
Anastos, M. (1949) Review of Westerink (1948) Speculum 24: 446–450.Google Scholar
Anderson, G. (1976) Lucian: Theme and Variation in the Second Sophistic. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, G. (1989) “The Pepaideumenos in action: Sophists and their outlook in the early Roman Empire”, ANRW II.33.1: 79–208.Google Scholar
Anderson, G. (1993) The Second Sophistic: A Cultural Phenomenon in the Roman Empire. London.Google Scholar
Andrei, O. (1989) “Introduzione”, in Andrei, O. and Scuderi, R. (eds.), Plutarco: vite parallele, Demetrio – Antonio. Milan, 35–93.Google Scholar
Arco Magrí, M. (1991) “Una pagina de Metochite sul Περὶ Ὁμήρου di Plutarco”, in D’Ippolito and Gallo (1991), 461–473.Google Scholar
Armstrong, A. (1948) “Anacharsis the Scythian”, G&R 17: 18–23.Google Scholar
Ash, R. (1997) “Severed heads: individual portraits and irrational forces in Plutarch’s Galba and Otho”, in Mossman, (1997a), 189–214.Google Scholar
Ash, R. (2008) “Standing in the shadows: Plutarch and the emperors in the Lives and Moralia”, in Nikolaidis (2008), 557–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ash, R., J. Mossman, and F. B. Titchener (eds.) (2015) Fame and Infamy: Essays for Christopher Pelling on Characterization in Greek and Roman Biography and History. Oxford.Google Scholar
Asirvatham, S. (2005) “Classicism and Romanitas in Plutarch’s De Alexandri Fortuna Aut Virtute”, AJPh 126: 107–125.Google Scholar
Astin, A. E. (1978) Cato the Censor. Oxford.Google Scholar
Aulotte, R. (1965) Amyot et Plutarque: La tradition des Moralia au XVIe siècle. Geneva.Google Scholar
Auzépy, M. (2008) “State of emergency (700–850)”, in Shepard (2008), 251–291.Google Scholar
Averintsev, S. (2002) “From biography to hagiography”, in French and St Clair (2002), 19–36.Google Scholar
Babbitt, F. (ed. and trans.) (1927) Plutarch’s Moralia: Vol. I. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Babut, D. (1963) “Les Stoïciens et l’amour”, REG 76: 55–63.Google Scholar
Babut, D. (ed.) (1969a) Plutarque, De la vertu éthique. Paris.Google Scholar
Babut, D. (1969b) Plutarque et le stoïcisme. Paris.Google Scholar
Babut, D. (1984) “Le dialogue de Plutarque sur le démon de Socrate: essai d’interpretation”, BAGB 1: 51–76. Reprinted in Babut (1994), 405–430.Google Scholar
Babut, D. (1992) “La composition des Dialogues Pythiques de Plutarque et le problème de leur unité”, Journal des Savants 2: 187–234. Reprinted in Babut (1994), 457–504.Google Scholar
Babut, D. (1994) Parerga: choix d’articles de Daniel Babut. Lyon.Google Scholar
Baker, P. (ed.) (2017) Biography, Historiography, and Modes of Philosophizing: The Tradition of Collective Biography in Early Modern Europe. Leiden.Google Scholar
Baker, P., R. Kaiser, M. Priesterjahn, and J. Helmrath (eds.) (2016) Portraying the Prince in the Renaissance: The Humanist Depiction of Rulers in Historiographical and Biographical Texts. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, E. J. (ed.) (2010), A Companion to the Ancient Greek Language. Malden, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1981) The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, ed. Holquist, M.. Emerson, Trans. C., and Holquist, M.. Austin, TX.Google Scholar
Balard, M. (ed.) (1986) Fortunes de Jacques Amyot: actes du colloque international. Paris.Google Scholar
Baldassari, M. (2000) “Osservazioni sulla struttura del period e sulla costruzione ritmica del discorso nei Moralia di Plutarco”, in Van der Stockt (2000b), 1–13.Google Scholar
Baldassarri, S. and Begemihl, R. (eds.) (2003) G. Manetti: Biographical Writings. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Baldwin, B. (1995) “Plutarch in Byzantium”, Byzantion 65: 525–526.Google Scholar
Baltes, M. (2000) “La dottrina dell’anima in Plutarco”, Elenchos 21: 245–270.Google Scholar
Baltes, M. (2005a) “Mittelplatonische ἐπιτομαί zu den Werken und der Philosophie Platons”, in Baltes (2005c), 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltes, M. (2005b) “Plutarchs Lehre von der Seele”, in Baltes (2005c), 77–99.Google Scholar
Baltes, M. (2005c), ΕΠΙΝΟΗΜΑΤΑ: Kleine Schriften zur antiken Philosophie und homerischen Dichtung von Matthias Baltes, ed. M.-L. Lakmann. Munich.Google Scholar
Banta, J. (2006) Imperium cum finibus: Plutarch’s Archaic Rome. Diss., State University of New York at Buffalo.Google Scholar
Banta, J. (2007a) “Who gives a fig (tree a name)? Chronotopic conflicts in Plutarch’s Romulus”, Intertexts 11: 25–41.Google Scholar
Banta, J. (2007b) “The Gates of Janus: Bakhtin and Plutarch’s Roman meta-chronotope”, in Larmour and Spencer (2007), 238–270.Google Scholar
Baragwanath, E. (2008) Motivation and Narrative in Herodotus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (2000) “The crossing”, in Harrison, S. (ed.), Texts, Ideas, and the Classics. Oxford, 142–163.Google Scholar
Barigazzi, A. (1984) “Plutarco e il corso futuro della storia”, Prometheus 10: 264–286. Reprinted in Barigazzi (1994), 303–330.Google Scholar
Barigazzi, A. (ed.) (1993) Plutarco. Se la virtù si debba insegnare (La fortuna, Se la virtù si possa insegnare). Se siano più gravi le malattie dell’animo o del corpo, Se il vizio sia sufficiente a rendere infelici, La virtù e il vizio (CPM 17). Naples.Google Scholar
Barigazzi, A. (1994) Studi su Plutarco. Florence.Google Scholar
Barnwell, H. (ed.) (1965) Pierre Corneille: Writings on the Theatre. Oxford.Google Scholar
Baron, H. (1928) Leonardo Bruni Aretino: Humanistisch-Philosophische Schriften; mit einer Chronologie seiner Werke und Briefe. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Baron, H. (1955) Humanistic and Political Literature in Florence and Venice at the Beginning of the Quattrocento. Studies in Criticism and Chronology. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Baron, H. (1966) The Crisis of the Early Italian Renaissance. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Barroll, J. (1958) “Shakespeare and Roman history”, Modern Language Review 53: 327–343.Google Scholar
Barrow, R. (1967) Plutarch and His Times. London.Google Scholar
Barzanò, A., Bearzot, C., Landucci, F., Prandi, L., and Zecchini, G. (eds.) (2003) Modelli eroici dall’Antichità alla cultura Europea. Rome.Google Scholar
Bauman, R. (2007) “The emergent quality of performance”, in Monaghan and Goodman (2007), 35–37.Google Scholar
Bazzani, M. (2006) “Theodore Metochites, a Byzantine humanist”, Byzantion 76: 32–52.Google Scholar
Bearzot, C. (ed.) (1993) Plutarco vite parallele: Focione (introduzione, traduzione e note di Cinzia Bearzot), Catone Uticense (introduzione di Joseph Geiger, traduzione e note di Lucia Ghilli). Milan.Google Scholar
Becchi, F. (1975) “Aristotelismo ed antistoicismo nel ‘De virtute morali’ di Plutarco”, Prometheus 1: 160–180.Google Scholar
Becchi, F. (1978) “Aristotelismo funzionale nel ‘De virtute morali’ di Plutarco”, Prometheus 4: 261–275.Google Scholar
Becchi, F. (1981) “Platonismo medio ed etica plutarchea”, Prometheus 7: 125–145.Google Scholar
Becchi, F. (1990a) “La nozione di ὀργή e di ἀοργησία in Aristotele e in Plutarco”, Prometheus 16: 65–87.Google Scholar
Becchi, F. (ed.) (1990b) Plutarco: la virtù etica. Introduzione, testo critico, traduzione e commento (CPM 5). Naples.Google Scholar
Becchi, F. (1993) “Istinto e intelligenza negli scritti zoopsicologici di Plutarco”, in Bandini, M. and Pericoli, F. (eds.), Scritti in memoria di Dino Pieraccioni. Florence, 59–83.Google Scholar
Becchi, F. (1999) “Plutarco tra platonismo ed aristotelismo: la filosofia come paideia dell’anima”, in Pérez Jiménez, García López, and Aguilar (1999), 25–43.Google Scholar
Becchi, F. (2000) “Irrazionalità e razionalità degli animali negli scritti di Plutarco”, Prometheus 26: 205–225.Google Scholar
Becchi, F. (2001) “Biopsicologia e giustizia verso gli animali in Teofrasto e Plutarco”, Prometheus 27: 119–135.Google Scholar
Becchi, F. (2005) “Éthique et régime alimentaire dans les écrits plutarquiens de psychologie animale”, in Boulogne (2005b), 145–156.Google Scholar
Becchi, F. (2007) “Para una interpretación unitaria de la doctrina del eros en Plutarco”, in Nieto Ibáñez and López López (2007), 95–103.Google Scholar
Becchi, F. (2009a) “La notion de philanthropia chez Plutarque: contexte social et sources philosophiques”, in Ribeiro Ferreira et al. (2009), 263–273.Google Scholar
Becchi, F. (2009b) “Le traduzioni latine dei Moralia di Plutarco tra XIII e XVI secolo”, in Volpe Cacciatore (2009), 11–52.Google Scholar
Becchi, F. (2014) “Plutarch, Aristotle, and the Peripatetics”, in Beck (2014a), 73–87.Google Scholar
Becchi, F. (2019) “Humanist Latin translations of the Moralia”, in Xenophontos and Oikonomopoulou (2019), 458–478.Google Scholar
Beck, H. (2002) “Interne synkrisis bei Plutarch”, Hermes 130: 467–489.Google Scholar
Beck, H. (2003) “Parallele Karrieren – Parallele Leben? Plutarchs Fabius Maximus und Marcellus”, in Barzanò, et al. (2003), 239–263.Google Scholar
Beck, M. (1998) Plutarch’s Use of Anecdotes in the Lives. Diss., University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Beck, M. (2000) “Anecdote and the representation of Plutarch’s ethos”, in Van der Stockt (2000b), 15–32.Google Scholar
Beck, M. (2002) “Plutarch to Trajan: the dedicatory letter and the Apophthegmata collection”, in Stadter and Van der Stockt (2002), 163–173.Google Scholar
Beck, M. (2004) “Plutarch on the statesman’s independence of action”, in de Blois et al. (2004), 105–114.Google Scholar
Beck, M. (2005) “The presentation of ideology and the use of subliterary forms in Plutarch’s works”, in Pérez Jiménez and Titchener (2005), 51–68.Google Scholar
Beck, M. (2007a) “Plutarch”, in I. J. F. de Jong and R. Nünlist (eds.) Time in Ancient Greek Narratives: Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative. Vol. II. Leiden, 397–411.Google Scholar
Beck, M. (2007b) “The story of Damon and the ideology of euergetism in the Lives of Cimon and Lucullus”, Hermathena 182: 53–69.Google Scholar
Beck, M. (2009) “Cena apud Catones: ideology and sympotic behavior”, in Ribeiro Ferreira et al. (2009), 147–163.Google Scholar
Beck, M. (2010) “Plutarch’s hypomnemata”, in Horster and Reitz (2010), 349–367.Google Scholar
Beck, M. (2012) “Plutarch”, in I. J. F. de Jong (ed.) Space in Ancient Greek Literature: Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative. Vol. III. Leiden, 441–462.Google Scholar
Beck, M. (2013) “Alexander for the Romans: the ideology of anger control in Plutarch and Arrian”, in Pace and Volpe Cassiatore (2013), 47–61.Google Scholar
Beck, M. (ed.) (2014a) A Companion to Plutarch. Chichester.Google Scholar
Beck, M. (2014b) “The Socratic paradigm”, in Beck (2014a), 463–478.Google Scholar
Beck, M. (2016) “The serio-comic Life of Antony”, in Opsomer, Roskam, and Titchener (2016), 137–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beier, A. (1985) Masterless Men: The Vagrancy Problem in England, 1560–1640. London.Google Scholar
Bekker, I. (ed.) (1838) Theophanes Continuatus. Bonn.Google Scholar
Belfiore, E. (1986) “Wine and catharsis of the emotions in Plato’s Laws”, CQ 36: 421–437.Google Scholar
Bellanti, A. (2003) “Aristotele pitagorico? La concezione della medietà nel De virtute morali di Plutarco”, RFN 95: 3–36.Google Scholar
Beneker, J. (2005) “Thematic correspondence in Plutarch’s Lives of Caesar, Pompey, and Crassus”, in de Blois et al. (2005), 315–325.Google Scholar
Beneker, J. (2009) “Drunken violence and the transition of power in Plutarch’s Alexander”, in Ribeiro Ferreira et al. (2009), 193–200.Google Scholar
Beneker, J. (2011) “Plutarch and Saint Basil as readers of Greek literature”, SyllClass 22: 95–111.Google Scholar
Beneker, J. (2012) The Passionate Statesman: Eros and Politics in Plutarch’s Lives. Oxford.Google Scholar
Beneker, J. (2014) “Sex, eroticism, and politics”, in Beck (2014a), 503–515.Google Scholar
Bergua Cavero, J. (1991) “Cinismo, ironía y retórica en el Bruta ratione uti de Plutarco”, in García López and Calderón Dorda (1991), 13–19.Google Scholar
Bergua Cavero, J. (1995) Estudios sobre la tradición de Plutarco en España (siglos XIII–XVII). Zaragoza.Google Scholar
Bers, V. (2010) “Kunstprosa: philosophy, history, oratory,” in Bakker (2010), 455–467.Google Scholar
Berschin, W. (1983a) “Sueton und Plutarch im 14. Jahrhundert”, in Buck, A. (ed.), Biographie und Autobiographie in der Renaissance. Wiesbaden, 35–43.Google Scholar
Berschin, W. (ed.) (1983b) Biographie zwischen Renaissance und Barock. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Berthelot, K. (2002) “Philo and kindness towards animals (De virtutibus 125–147)”, The Studia Philonica Annual 14: 49–65.Google Scholar
Besterman, T. (1926) “Bibliography of Cleopatra”, Notes Queries 150.6: 93–97, 111–114.Google Scholar
Beta, S. (2009) “Riddling at table: trivial ainigmata vs. philosophical problemata”, in Ribeiro Ferreira et al. (2009), 97–102.Google Scholar
Bettini, M. and Franco, C. (2009) “La notion de philanthrōpia chez Plutarque: contexte social et sources philosophiques”, in Ribeiro Ferreira et al. (2009), 263–273.Google Scholar
Bettini, M. and Franco, C. (2010) Il mito di Circe: Immagini e racconti dalla Grecia a oggi. Turin.Google Scholar
Betz, H.-D. (ed.) (1978) Plutarch’s Ethical Writings and Early Christian Literature. Leiden.Google Scholar
Bevegni, C. (1993) “Teodoro Gaza traduttore del ‘Maxime cum principibus philosopho esse disserendum’ di Plutarco: primi appunti per un’edizione critica con particolare riguardo alla lettera dedicatoria ad Andrea Bussi”, in S. Feraboli (ed.), Mosaico: Studi in onore di Umberto Albini. Genova, 33–42.Google Scholar
Billault, A. (2005) “Le modèle animal dans le traité de Plutarque”, in Boulogne (2005b), 33–42.Google Scholar
Biraud, M. (2014) “Usages narratifs des clausules métriques et des égalités syllabiques dans l’Eroticos de Plutarque”, Ploutarchos 11: 39–55.Google Scholar
Blackwell, C. (1986) “Humanism and politics in English royal biography: the use of Cicero, Plutarch, and Sallust in the ‘Vita Henrici Quinti’ (1438) by Titus Livius de Frulovisi and the ‘Vita Henrici Septimi’ (1500–1503) by Bernard André”, in McFarlane, I. (ed.), Acta Conventus Neo-Latini Sanctandreani: Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress of Neo-Latin Studies. Binghamton, NY,431–440.Google Scholar
Blamire, A. (ed.) (1989) Plutarch, Life of Kimon. London.Google Scholar
Blomqvist, K. (1997) “From Olympias to Aretaphila: women in politics in Plutarch”, in Mossman (1997a), 73–97.Google Scholar
Bloom, A., (ed.) (1991) The Republic of Plato, 2nd ed. New York.Google Scholar
Blunt, A. (1995) Poussin. London.Google Scholar
Boas, F. (ed.) (1911) Caesar’s Revenge by Anon. (1611). Oxford.Google Scholar
Bodin, J. (1969) Methodus ad facilem historiarum cognitionem. Trans. B. Reynolds. New York.Google Scholar
Boissonade, J. F. (ed.) (1964) Michael Psellus: De operatione daemonum. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M. (2003) Academici e Platonici: Il dibattito antico sullo scetticismo di Platone. Milan.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M. (2007) “Plutarco, l’Academia e la politica”, in Volpe Cacciatore and Ferrari (2007), 265–280.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M. (2009) “Antiochus’ ethics and the subordination of Stoicism”, in Bonazzi and Opsomer (2009), 33–54.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M. (2016) “The perfidious strategies, or, the Platonists against Stoicism”, in Weisser and Thaler (2016), 166–184.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M. and Opsomer, J. (2009) The Origins of the Platonic System: Platonisms of the Early Empire and Their Philosophical Contexts (Collection d’études classiques, 23). Louvain.Google Scholar
Bosworth, A. (1988) From Arrian to Alexander: Studies in Historical Interpretation. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bosworth, A. (1992) “History and artifice in Plutarch’s Eumenes”, in Stadter (1992b), 56–89.Google Scholar
Boulanger, A. (1923) Aelius Aristide. Paris.Google Scholar
Boulet, B. (2005) “Is Numa the genuine philosopher king?” in de Blois et al. (2005), 245–256.Google Scholar
Boulet, B. (2014) “The philosopher king”, in Beck (2014a), 449–462.Google Scholar
Boulogne, J. (1992) “Les ‘Questions Romaines’ de Plutarque”, ANRW II.33.6: 4682–4708.Google Scholar
Boulogne, J. (1994) Plutarque: Un aristocrate grec sous l’occupation romaine. Villeneuve d’Ascq.Google Scholar
Boulogne, J. (1996) “Plutarque et la Médecine”, ANRW II.37.3: 2762–2792.Google Scholar
Boulogne, J. (2000) “Les ΣΥΓΚΡΙΣΕΙΣ de Plutarque: Une rhétorique de la ΣΥΝΚΡΑΣΙΣ”, in Van der Stockt (2000b), 33–44.Google Scholar
Boulogne, J. (2003) Plutarque dans le miroir d’Épicure. Villeneuve d’Ascq.Google Scholar
Boulogne, J. (2005a) “Le culte égyptien des animaux vu par Plutarque: Une étiologie égyptienne (Isis et Osiris, 71–76, 379D–382 C)”, in Boulogne (2005b), 197–205.Google Scholar
Boulogne, J. (ed.) (2005b) Les Grecs de l’antiquité et les animaux: Le cas remarquable de Plutarque. Villeneuve d’Ascq.Google Scholar
Boulogne, J. (2009–10) “La philosophie du mariage chez Plutarque”, Ploutarchos 7: 23–34.Google Scholar
Bovon, A. (1963) “La représentation des guerriers perses et la notion de barbare dans la première moitié du cinquième siècle”, BCH 87: 579–602.Google Scholar
Bowen, A. (ed.) (1992) Plutarch: The Malice of Herodotus (de Malignitate Herodoti). Warminster.Google Scholar
Bowersock, G. W. (1969) Greek Sophists and the Roman Empire. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bowersock, G. (1995) “The barbarism of the Greeks,” HSCPh 97: 3–14.Google Scholar
Bowersock, G. W. and C. P. Jones (1974) “A guide to the sophists in Philostratus’ Vitae Sophistarum”, in G. W. Bowersock (ed.), Approaches to the Second Sophistic. University Park, PA, 35–40.Google Scholar
Bowie, A. (2003) “‘Fate may harm me, I have dined today’: near-eastern royal banquets and Greek symposia in Herodotus”, Pallas 61: 99–109.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. (1970) “Greeks and their past in the Second Sophistic”, P&P 46: 3–41. Reprinted in M. Finley (ed.) (1974) Studies in Ancient Society. London, 166–209.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. (1986) “Early Greek elegy, symposium and public festival”, JHS 106: 13–35.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. (1993) “Greek table-talk before Plato”, Rhetorica 11.4: 355–373.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. (2008) “Plutarch’s habits of citation: aspects of difference”, in Nikolaidis (2008), 143–157.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. (2014) “Poetry and education”, in Beck (2014a), 177–190.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. (1997) “Thyrsus-bearer of the academy or enthusiast for Plato?” in Mossman (1997a), 41–58.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. (1998) “Plutarch on koinos logos: towards an architecture of the De Stoicorum Repugnantiis”, OSAPh 16: 299–329.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. (2001) Post-Hellenistic Philosophy: A Study of Its Development from the Stoics to Origen. Oxford.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. (2018) Platonist Philosophy 80 BC to AD 250: An Introduction and Collection of Sources in Translation. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. (2019) “Difference, opposition, and the roots of intolerance in ancient philosophical polemic”, in van Kooten, G. H. and van Ruiten, J. (eds.), Intolerance, Polemics, and Debate in Antiquity: Politico-Cultural, Philosophical, and Religious Forms of Critical Conversation. Leiden, 259–281.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G., Graziosi, B., and Vasunia, P. (eds.) (2009) Oxford Companion of Hellenic Studies. Oxford.Google Scholar
Braden, G. (2004) “Plutarch, Shakespeare, and the alpha males”, in Martindale (2004), 188–205.Google Scholar
Braden, G. (2014) “Shakespeare”, in Beck (2014a), 577–591.Google Scholar
Bradley, K. (2000), “Animalizing the slave: the truth of fiction”, JRS 90: 110–125.Google Scholar
Branham, R. Bracht (1989) Unruly Eloquence: Lucian and the Comedy of Traditions. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Branham, R. Bracht (1996) “Defacing the currency: Diogenes’ rhetoric and the invention of Cynicism”, in Branham and Goulet-Cazé (1996), 81–104.Google Scholar
Branham, R and Goulet-Cazé, M.-O. (eds.) (1996) The Cynics: The Cynic Movement in Antiquity and Its Legacy. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Braund, D. (1993) “Dionysiac tragedy in Plutarch’s Crassus”, CQ 43: 468–474.Google Scholar
Braund, D. and Wilkins, J. (eds.) (2000) Athenaeus and His World: Reading Greek Culture in the Roman Empire. Exeter.Google Scholar
Bréchet, C. (2003) “Les palaioi chez Plutarque”, in Bakhouche, B. (ed.), L’Ancienneté chez les anciens, vol. II: Mythologie et Religion. Montpellier, 519–550.Google Scholar
Bréchet, C. (2005) “La Philosophie de Gryllos”, in Boulogne (2005b), 43–62.Google Scholar
Bréchet, C. (2007) “Vers une philosophie de la citation poétique: écrit, oral et mémoire chez Plutarque”, Hermathena 182: 101–134.Google Scholar
Brélaz, C. (2008) “L’adieu aux armes. La défense de la cité grecque dans l’Empire romain pacifié”, in Brélaz, C. and Ducrey, P. (eds.), Sécurité collective et ordre public dans les sociétés anciennes. Geneva, 155–196.Google Scholar
Bremer, J. (2005) “Plutarch and the ‘liberation of Greece’”, in de Blois et al. (2005), 257–267.Google Scholar
Brenk, F. (1977) In Mist Apparelled: Religious Themes in Plutarch’s Moralia and Lives. Leiden.Google Scholar
Brenk, F. (1986) “In the light of the moon: demonology in the early imperial period”, ANRW II.16.3: 2068–2145.Google Scholar
Brenk, F. (1987) “An imperial heritage: the religious spirit of Plutarch of Chaironeia”, ANRW II. 36.1: 248–349.Google Scholar
Brenk, F. (1992) “Plutarch’s life ‘Markos Antonios:’ a literary and cultural study”, ANRW II.33.6: 4347–4402.Google Scholar
Brenk, F. (1996) “Time as structure in Plutarch’s The Daimonion of Sokrates”, in Van der Stockt (1996), 29–51. Reprinted in Brenk (1998), 59–81.Google Scholar
Brenk, F. (1998) Relighting the Souls: Studies in Plutarch, in Greek Literature, Religion, and Philosophy and in the New Testament Background. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Brenk, F. (2000) “All for love: the rhetoric of exaggeration in Plutarch’s Erotikos”, in Van der Stockt (2000b), 45–60.Google Scholar
Brenk, F. (2002) “Religion under Trajan: Plutarch’s resurrection of Osiris”, in Stadter and Van der Stockt (2002), 73–92.Google Scholar
Brenk, F. (2005) “The barbarian within: Gallic and Galatian heroines in Plutarch’s Erotikos”, in Pérez Jiménez and Titchener (2005), 93–106.Google Scholar
Brenk, F. (2007) With Unperfumed Voice: Studies in Plutarch, in Greek Literature, Religion and Philosophy, and in the New Testament Background. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Brenk, F. (2009) “In learned conversation: Plutarch’s symposiac literature and the elusive authorial voice”, in Ribeiro Ferreira et al. (2009), 51–61.Google Scholar
Brennan, T. (1998) “The old Stoic theory of emotions”, in Sihvola, J. and Engberg-Pedersen, T. (eds.), Emotions in Hellenistic Philosophy. Dordrecht, 21–70.Google Scholar
Brennan, T. (2003) “Stoic moral psychology”, in Inwood, (2003), 257–294.Google Scholar
Briant, P. (2002a) From Cyrus to Alexander: A History of the Persian Empire. Trans. P. T. Daniels. Winona Lake, IN.Google Scholar
Briant, P. (2002b) “History and ideology: the Greeks and ‘Persian decadence’”, in Harrison (2002), 193–210.Google Scholar
Brisson, L. (1997) “Le corps animal comme signe de la valeur d’une âme chez Platon”, in Cassin and Labarrière (1997), 227–245.Google Scholar
Brittain, C. (2001) Philo of Larissa: The Last of the Academic Sceptics. Oxford.Google Scholar
Brouillette, X. (2014) La Philosophie delphique de Plutarque. L’itinéraire des Dialogues pythiques. Paris.Google Scholar
Brouillette, X. and Giavatto, A. (eds.) (2011) Les dialogues platoniciens chez Plutarque: Stratégies et méthodes exégétiques. Leuven.Google Scholar
Brown, A. (1992) The Medici in Power: The Exercise and Language of Power. Florence.Google Scholar
Browning, R. (1975) “Enlightenment and repression in Byzantium in the eleventh and twelfth centuries”, P&P 69: 3–23.Google Scholar
Brubaker, L. and Haldon, J. (2011) Byzantium in the Iconoclast Era c. 680–850: A History. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bryson, N. (1981) Word and Image: French Painting of the Ancien Régime. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bucher-Isler, B. (1972) Norm und Individualität in den Biographien Plutarchs. Bern.Google Scholar
Buckler, G. (1929) Anna Comnena: A Study. Oxford.Google Scholar
Buckler, J. (1992) “Plutarch and autopsy”, ANRW II.33.6: 4788–4830.Google Scholar
Bullock, A. (1991) Hitler and Stalin: Parallel Lives. New York.Google Scholar
Bullough, G. (ed.) (1957–79) Narrative and Dramatic Sources of Shakespeare (8 vols.). London.Google Scholar
Burgess, S. (2008) “Plato’s Timaeus on clever and non-clever creatures”, in Alexandridis, Wild, and Winkler-Horaček (2008), 13–26.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1996) “Plutarco: Religiosità personale e teologia filosofica”, in Gallo (1996), 11–28.Google Scholar
Burns, A. (2015) Diatribe and Plutarch’s Practical Ethics. Diss., University of Iowa.Google Scholar
Burns, J. M. (1978) Leadership. New York.Google Scholar
Burridge, R. (2004) What Are the Gospels? A Comparison with Graeco-Roman Biography, 2nd ed. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Burrow, C. (2013) Shakespeare and Classical Antiquity. Oxford.Google Scholar
Busine, A. (2002) Les sept sages de la Grèce antique: Transmission et utilisation d’un patrimone légendaire d’Hérodote à Plutarque. Paris.Google Scholar
Buszard, B. (2005a) “The decline of the Roman republic in Pyrrhus–Marius”, in de Blois et al. (2005), 281–296.Google Scholar
Buszard, B. (2005b) “The decline of Roman statesmanship in Plutarch’s Pyrrhus–Marius”, CQ 55: 481–497.Google Scholar
Buszard, B. (2008) “Caesar’s ambition: a combined reading of Plutarch’s Alexander–Caesar and Pyrrhus–Marius”, TAPhA 138: 185–215.Google Scholar
Buszard, B. (2010) “The speech of Greek and Roman women in Plutarch’s Lives”, CPh 105: 83–115.Google Scholar
Bydén, B. (2002) “The nature and purpose of the Semeioseis gnomikai: the antithesis of philosophy and rhetoric”, in Hult (2002), 245–288.Google Scholar
Byl, S. (1977) “Plutarque et la vieillesse”, LEC 45: 107–123.Google Scholar
Caballos Rufino, A. (1990) Los senadores hispanorromanos y la romanización de Hispania (Sigla 1 al III p.C). I: Prosopograifia (Monografias del Departamento de Historia Antigua de la Universidad de Sevilla). Écija.Google Scholar
Cacciari, A. (1995) “Plutarco”, in Mattioli, U. (ed.), Senectus: La vecchiaia nel mondo classico. Vol. I: Grecia. Bologna, 361–395.Google Scholar
Caiazza, A. (ed.) (1993) Precetti politici (CPM 14). Naples.Google Scholar
Calder, L. (2011) Cruelty and Sentimentality: Greek Attitudes to Animals, 600–300 BC. Oxford.Google Scholar
Calder, L. (2017) “Pet and image in the Greek world: the use of domesticated animals in human interaction”, in Fögen and Thomas (2017), 61–83.Google Scholar
Calderón Dorda, E. (1999) “El vino, la medicina y los ‘remedia ebrietatis’ en los Moralia de Plutarco”, in Montes Cala et al. (1999), 119–128.Google Scholar
Calkins, G. (ed.) (1943) Antoine de Montchrestien: Les Lacènes. Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. (2006) The Byzantines. Chichester.Google Scholar
Cameron, A., J. Herrin, A. Cameron, R. Cormack, and C. Roueché, (eds.) (1984) Constantinople in the Early Eighth Century: The Parastaseis Syntomoi Chronikai. New York.Google Scholar
Cammelli, G. (1941) “Manuele Crisolora”, in I dotti bizantini e le origini dell’umanesimo: Vol. I. Florence.Google Scholar
Campangne, H.-T. (2012) “Poétique de l’instant tragique: la place et l’influence des Vies de Plutarque dans la définition du tragique en France, 1600–1645”, in Guerrier (2012), 55–68.Google Scholar
Campbell, G. (ed.) (2014) The Oxford Handbook of Animals in Classical Thought and Life. Oxford.Google Scholar
Canart, P. (1978) “Le livre grec en Italie méridionale sous les règnes Normand et Souabe: aspects matériels et sociaux”, Scrittura e civilta 2: 103–162.Google Scholar
Canart, P. (1982) “La collection hagiographique palimpseste du Palatinus Graecus 205 et la passion de S. Georges BHG 670 g”, AB 100: 87–109.Google Scholar
Candau Morón, J., González Ponce, F., and Chávez Reino, A. (eds.) (2011) Plutarco Transmisor. Seville.Google Scholar
Cannatà Fera, M. (1994) “Plutarco e la Consolatio ad Apollonium”, AncW 25: 171–189.Google Scholar
Cantor, P. (1997) “Shakespeare’s Parallel Lives: Plutarch and the Roman plays”, in McGrail (1997), 69–82.Google Scholar
Carrara, P. (1988) “Plutarco ed Euripide: alcune considerazioni sulle citazioni euripidee in Plutarco (De aud. poet.)”, ICS 13: 447–455.Google Scholar
Carrière, J. C. (1977) “A propos de la Politique de Plutarque”, DHA 3: 237–251.Google Scholar
Carrière, J. C. (ed.) (1984) Plutarque: Oeuvres morales. Vol. XI.2. Paris.Google Scholar
Carrington, D. (1988) Napoleon and His Parents: On the Threshold of History. London.Google Scholar
Cartledge, P. (1990) “Herodotus and ‘the Other:’ a meditation on empire”, EMC/CV 9: 27–40.Google Scholar
Cartledge, P. (1993) The Greeks. Oxford.Google Scholar
Cartledge, P. and Spawforth, A. (2001) Hellenistic and Roman Sparta: A Tale of Two Cities, 2nd ed. New York.Google Scholar
Casanova, A. (2005a) “Il Grillo di Plutarco e Omero”, in Boulogne (2005b), 97–110.Google Scholar
Casanova, A. (2005b) “The time setting of the dialogue Bruta animalia ratione uti”, in Pérez Jiménez and Titchener (2005), 121–132.Google Scholar
Casanova, A. (2006–7) “Il Grillo di Plutarco e la tradizione della figura di Ulisse”, Ploutarchos 4: 19–28.Google Scholar
Casanova, A. (2012) “La giustizia nel Grillo e la conclusione del dialogo”, in Ribeiro Ferreira, Leão, and Martins de Jesus (2012), 181–189.Google Scholar
Casanova, A. (ed.) (2013) Figure d’Atene nelle opere di Plutarco. Florence.Google Scholar
Cassin, B. and J.-L. Labarrière (eds.) (1997) L’animal dans l’antiquité. Paris.Google Scholar
Castelnérac, B. (2007) “The method of ‘eclecticism’ in Plutarch and Seneca”, Hermathena 182: 135–163.Google Scholar
Catanzaro, A. (2013) “Plutarch at Byzantium in XII century: Niketa Choniates and Plutarchean political areté in the Chronikè Diéghesis”, in Pace and Volpe Cacciatore (2013), 111–117.Google Scholar
Cavallo, G. (1980) “La trasmissione scritta della cultura greca antica in Calabria e in Sicilia tra I secoli X–XV”, Scrittura e civilta 4: 157–245.Google Scholar
Cavallo, G. (ed.) (1982) Libri e lettori nel mondo Bizantino: Guida storica e critica. Rome.Google Scholar
Cazals, R. (2001) “Plutarque a-t-il menti?” in Caucanas, S., Cazals, R., and Payen, P. (eds.), Retrouver, imaginer, utiliser l’Antiquité. Toulouse, 141–146.Google Scholar
Champion, C. (2000) “Romans as ΒΑΡΒΑΡΟΙ: three Polybian speeches and the politics of cultural indeterminacy”, CPh 95: 425–444.Google Scholar
Chandezon, C. (2005) Plutarque en sa terre. Diss., Sorbonne University.Google Scholar
Chaniotis, A. (2010) “Illusions of democracy in the Hellenistic world”, Athens Dialogues, November.Google Scholar
Chantraine, P. (1980) Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque. Vol. IV.2. Paris.Google Scholar
Chapman, A. (2011) The Female Principle in Plutarch’s Moralia. Dublin.Google Scholar
Cherchi, P. (1993) “Plutarch’s letter in Mexia’s Silva”, Modern Philology 91: 54–59.Google Scholar
Chernaik, W. (2011) The Myth of Rome in Shakespeare and His Contemporaries. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cherniss, H. (1954) “The sources of evil according to Plato”, PAPhS 98: 23–30.Google Scholar
Cherniss, H. (ed. and trans.) (1976a) Plutarch’s Moralia. Vol. XIII.1. 999C–1032F. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Cherniss, H. (ed. and trans.) (1976b) Plutarch’s Moralia. Vol. XIII.2. 1033A–1086B. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Cherniss, H. and W. C. Helmbold (eds. and trans.) (1957), Plutarch’s Moralia. Vol. XII. 920A–999B. Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
Chlup, J. (2009) “Crassus as symposiast in Plutarch’s Life of Crassus”, in Ribeiro Ferreira et al. (2009), 181–190.Google Scholar
Chrysanthou, C. (2017) “The proems of Plutarch’s Lives and historiography”, Histos 11: 128–153.Google Scholar
Chrysanthou, C. (2018) Plutarch’s Parallel Lives: Narrative Technique and Moral Judgement. Berlin.Google Scholar
Chrysanthou, C. (2020) “Plutarch and the ‘malicious’ historian”, ICS 45: 49–79.Google Scholar
Clare, L. (1968) “La première traduction en Occident des Vies Parallèles de Plutarque”, BAGB 27: 405–426.Google Scholar
Clare, L. and Jouan, F. (1969) “La plus ancienne traduction occidentale des Vies de Plutarque”, in Actes VIIIe Congrès de l’Association G. Budé. Paris, 567–569.Google Scholar
Clark, G. (2017) “Philosophers’ pets: Porphyry’s partridge and Augustine’s dog”, in Fögen and Thomas (2017), 139–157.Google Scholar
Clarke, D. (1994) “Plutarch’s contribution to the invention of Sabine in Corneille’s Horace”, The Modern Language Review 89.1: 39–49.Google Scholar
Clayton, T. (1983) “‘Should Brutus never taste of Portia’s death but once?’ Text and performance in Julius Caesar”, Studies in English Literature 23: 237–255.Google Scholar
Colonnese, C. (2007) Le scelte di Plutarco: le vite non scritte di greci illustri. Rome.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. (2001) “Problems of the past in imperial Greek education”, in Too, Y. L. (ed.), Education in Greek and Roman Antiquity. Leiden, 339–372.Google Scholar
Connors, S. P. (ed.) (2014) The Politics of Panem: Challenging Genres. Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Conquergood, D. (2007) “Poetics, play, process, and power: the performative turn in anthropology”, in Monaghan, and Goodman, (2007), 38–40.Google Scholar
Constantinidis, C. (1982) Higher Education in Byzantium in the Thirteenth and Early Fourteenth Centuries: 1204–ca 1310. Nicosia.Google Scholar
Cook, A. (1996) “The transmutation of heroic complexity: Plutarch and Shakespeare”, CML 17: 31–43.Google Scholar
Cook, B. (2004) “Plutarch’s ‘many other’ imitable events: Mor. 814b and the statesman’s duty”, in de Blois et al. (2004), 201–210.Google Scholar
Corneille, P. (1965) Writings on the Theatre, ed. Barnwell, H.. Oxford.Google Scholar
Correia Martins, A. I. (2011) “O binomio felicitas vera & falsa nas sentencas de Plutarco no tratado de filosofia moral de Frei Luis de Granada”, in Candau Morón et al. (2011), 533–544.Google Scholar
Coulobaritsis, L. (1986) “La psychologie chez Chrysippe”, Entretiens Hardt 32: 99–142.Google Scholar
Craig, C. (1986) “Cicero’s Stoicism and the understanding of Cicero’s speech for Murena”, TAPhA 116: 229–239.Google Scholar
Crawford, M. (1999) “Amatorius: Plutarch’s Platonic departure from the peri gamou literature”, in Pérez Jiménez, García López, and Aguilar (1999), 287–298.Google Scholar
Cuartero Sancho, M. (1981) Fuentes clásicas de la literatura paremiológica española del siglo XVI. Zaragoza.Google Scholar
Cuvigny, M. (1969) “Plutarque et Épictète”, in Association G. Budé: Actes du VIIIe Congrès (5–10 mai 1968). Paris, 565–566.Google Scholar
Dalby, A. (2000) Empire of Pleasures: Luxury and Indulgence in the Roman World. London.Google Scholar
D’Aubigné, A. (1995) Les Tragiques, ed. Fanlo, J.-R., 2 vols. Paris.Google Scholar
Dauge, Y. A. (1981) Le barbare: Recherches sur la conception romaine de la barbarie et de la civilisation. Brussels.Google Scholar
David-de Palacio, M.-F. (2012) “’L’Anti-Plutarque’: variations Germanique, Américaine et Française entre 1860 et 1925”, in Guerrier (2012), 319–335.Google Scholar
Davies, P. and Mossman, J. (eds.) (forthcoming in 2023) Plutarch and Sparta. Swansea.Google Scholar
de Blois, L. (1992) “The perception of politics in Plutarch’s Roman Lives”, ANRW II.33.6: 4568–4615.Google Scholar
de Blois, L., Bons, J., Kessels, T., and Schenkeveld, D. (eds.) (2004) The Statesman in Plutarch’s Works. Vol. I: Plutarch’s Statesman and His Aftermath: Political, Philosophical, and Literary Aspects. Leiden.Google Scholar
de Blois, L., Bons, J., Kessels, T., and Schenkeveld, D. (2005) The Statesman in Plutarch’s Works. Vol. II: The Statesman in Plutarch’s Greek and Roman Lives. Leiden.Google Scholar
de Fontenay, E. (1997) “La philanthrôpia à l’épreuve des bêtes”, in Cassin, and Labarrière, (1997), 281–298.Google Scholar
de Jesus, C. (2009) “Dancing with Plutarch: dance and dance theory in Plutarch’s Table Talk”, in Ribeiro Ferreira et al. (2009), 403–414.Google Scholar
De Lacy, P. (1952) “Biography and tragedy in Plutarch”, AJPh 73: 159–171.Google Scholar
de Lagarde, P. (ed.) (1882) Iohannis Euchaitorum metropolitae quae in codice Vaticano graeco 676 supersunt. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Delli, E. (2019) “The reception of Plutarch in Michael Psellos’ philosophical, theological and rhetorical works: an elective affinity”, in Xenophontos and Oikonomopoulou (2019), 205–233.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. (1996) Kinds of Minds: Towards an Understanding of Consciousness. London.Google Scholar
Denton, J. (1993) “Wearing a gown in the market place or a toga in the forum: Coriolanus from Plutarch to Shakespeare via renaissance translation”, in Caliumi, G. (ed.), Shakespeare e la sua eredità. Parma, 97–109.Google Scholar
Denton, J. (1997) “Plutarch, Shakespeare, Roman politics and Renaissance translation”, in McGrail (1997), 187–210.Google Scholar
Depew, M. and Obbink, D. (eds.) (2000) Matrixes of Genre: Authors, Canons, and Society. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
De Pourcq, M. and Roskam, G. (2016) “Mirroring virtues in Plutarch’s Lives of Agis, Cleomenes, and the Gracchi”, in De Temmerman and Demoen (2016), 163–180.Google Scholar
de Romilly, J. (1979) La douceur dans la pensée grecque. Paris.Google Scholar
de Romilly, J. (1994–5) “Cruauté barbare et cruautés grecques”, WS 107/108: 187–196.Google Scholar
Desan, P. (ed.) (2007) Dictionnaire de Montaigne. Paris.Google Scholar
Desideri, P. (1985) “Ricchezza e vita politica nel pensiero di Plutarco”, Index 13: 391–405.Google Scholar
Desideri, P. (1986) “La vita politica cittadina nell’impero: lettura dei Praecepta gerendae rei publicae e dell’An seni res publica gerenda sit”, Athenaeum 64: 371–381. Reprinted in Desideri (2012), 111–123.Google Scholar
Desideri, P. (1989) “Teoria e prassi storiografica di Plutarco: una proposta di lettura della coppia Emilio Paolo – Timoleonte”, Maia 41: 199–215. Reprinted in Desideri (2012), 201–218.Google Scholar
Desideri, P. (1991a) “Citazione letteraria e riferimento storico nei ‘Precetti politici’ di Plutarco”, in D’Ippolito and Gallo (1991), 225–233.Google Scholar
Desideri, P. (1991b) “Dione di Prusa fra ellenismo e romanità”, ANRW II.33.5: 3882–3901.Google Scholar
Desideri, P. (1992) “La formazione delle coppie nelle ‘Vite plutarchee’”, ANRW II.33.6: 4470–4486. Reprinted in Desideri (2012), 229–245.Google Scholar
Desideri, P. (1995a) “‘Non scriviamo storie, ma vite’ (Plut., Alex. 1.2): la formula biografica di Plutarco”, Testis Temporum. Aspetti e problemi della storiografia antica. Como, 15–25. Reprinted in Desideri (2012), 219–227.Google Scholar
Desideri, P. (1995b) “Plutarco e Machiavelli”, in Gallo and Scardigli (1995), 107–122. Reprinted in Desideri, (2012), 283–297.Google Scholar
Desideri, P. (2011) “Greek poleis and the Roman Empire: nature and features of political virtues in an autocratic system”, in Roskam and Van der Stockt (2011), 83–98. Reprinted in Desideri (2012), 125–139.Google Scholar
Desideri, P. (2012) Saggi su Plutarco e la sua fortuna, ed. Casanova, A.. Florence.Google Scholar
Desideri, P. (2017) “Plutarch’s Lives”, in Richter and Johnson (2017), 311–326.Google Scholar
Desmond, W. (2008) Cynics. Stocksfield.Google Scholar
De Temmerman, K. (ed.) (2020) The Oxford Handbook of Ancient Biography. Oxford.Google Scholar
De Temmerman, K. and Demoen, K. (eds.) (2016) Writing Biography in Greece and Rome: Narrative Technique and Fictionalization. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Deuse, W. (1983) Untersuchungen zur mittelplatonischen und neuplatonischen Seelenlehre. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Deuse, W. (2010) “Plutarch’s eschatological myths”, in Nesselrath (2010), 169–197.Google Scholar
Díaz Lavado, J. (1996) “Poesía y educación en Plutarco a través del testimonio de ‘De audiendis poetis’”, in y Bereterbide, F. Lisi, Bracero, J. Ureña, and Zoido (eds.), J. Iglesias, Didáctica del Griego y de la cultura clásica: IX Jornadas de Filología Griega (Cáceres, Mayo de 1993). Madrid, 113–120.Google Scholar
Díaz Martínez, E. (2002) “Notas sobre las referencias a Plutarco en la prosa de Quevedo”, Boletín de la Biblioteca de Menéndez Pelayo 78: 69–79.Google Scholar
Dierauer, U. 1977. Tier und Mensch im Denken der Antike. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Dierauer, U. (1997) “Raison ou instinct? Le développement de la zoopsychologie antique”, in Cassin, and Labarrière, (1997), 3–30.Google Scholar
Dihle, A. (1956) Studien zur griechischen Biographie. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Dihle, A. (1994) Die Griechen und die Fremden. Munich.Google Scholar
Dihle, A. (2000) “Ein Streit um die rechte Sokrates-Nachfolge”, in Haltenhoff, A. and Mutschler, F.-H. (eds.), Hortus Litterarum Antiquarum: Festschrift für Hans Armin Gärtner zum 70. Geburtstag. Heidelberg, 93–105.Google Scholar
Diller, A. (1937) “Codices Planudei”, Byzantinische Zeitschrift 37: 295–301.Google Scholar
Diller, A. (1954) “Pletho and Plutarch”, Scriptorium 8: 123–127.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. (1977) The Middle Platonists: A Study of Platonism 80 B.C. to A.D. 220. London.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. (1988) “‘Orthodoxy’ and ‘eclecticism’: Middle Platonists and neo-Pythagoreans”, in Dillon, and Long, (1988),103–125.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. (1996) The Middle Platonists: A Study of Platonism 80 B.C. to A.D. 220. Ithaca, NY (updated edition).Google Scholar
Dillon, J. (1997) “Plutarch and the end of history”, in Mossman (1997a), 233–240.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. (2002) “Plutarch and god: theodicy and cosmogony in the thought of Plutarch”, in Frede, D. and Laks, A. (eds.), Traditions of Theology: Studies in Hellenistic Theology, Its Background and Aftermath (Philosophia antiqua 89). Leiden, 223–237.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. (2008) “Dion and Brutus: philosopher kings adrift in a hostile world”, in Nikolaidis (2008), 351–364. Reprinted in L. J. Trudeau (ed.) (2012) Classical and Medieval Literary Criticism 146: 184–191. Detroit, MI.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. (2010) “Aspects de l’exégèse dualiste de Platon par Plutarque”, in Brouillette, and Giavatto, (2010), 65–74.Google Scholar
Dillon, , J. M. and A. A. Long (eds.) (1988) The Question of “Eclecticism”: Studies in Later Greek Philosophy. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Dimitrova, M. (2019) “Taking centre stage: Plutarch and Shakespeare”, in Xenophontos and Oikonomopoulou (2019), 493–511.Google Scholar
D’Ippolito, G. (1991) “Il Corpus plutarcheo come macrotesto di un progetto antropologico: modi e funzioni della autotestualità”, in D’Ippolito and Gallo (1991), 9–18.Google Scholar
D’Ippolito, G. (1996) “Stilemi ilomorfici nel macrotesto plutarcheo”, in Fernández Delgado, and Pordomingo Pardo, (1996), 17–29.Google Scholar
D’Ippolito, G. (2009) “Plutarco e la lettura nel simposio”, in Ribeiro Ferreira et al. (2009), 113–121.Google Scholar
D’Ippolito, G. and Gallo, I. (eds.) (1991) Strutture formali dei ‘Moralia’ di Plutarco: Atti del III Convegno plutarcheo. Naples.Google Scholar
Di Stefano, G. (1968) La découverte de Plutarque en Occident: aspects de la vie intellectuelle en Avignon au XIVe siècle. Turin.Google Scholar
Ditadi, G. (2000) Plutarco: L’intelligenza degli animali e la giustizia loro dovuta. Este.Google Scholar
Dmitriev, S. (2005) City Government in Hellenistic and Roman Asia Minor. Oxford.Google Scholar
Dodds, E. (1933) “The portrait of a Greek gentleman”, G&R 2: 97–107.Google Scholar
Dognini, C. (2007) “Il De Herodoti malignitate e la fortuna di Erodoto”, in Perrin (ed.), Y., Neronia VII. Rome, l’Italie et la Grèce. Hellénisme et philhellénisme au premier siècle après J.-C. Actes du VIIe Colloque International de la SIEN (Collection Latomus 305). Brussels, 481–502.Google Scholar
Dombrowski, D. (2014) “Philosophical vegetarianism and animal entitlements”, in Campbell (2014), 535–555.Google Scholar
Donahue, J. F. (2003) “Toward a typology of Roman public feasting”, AJPh 124: 423–441.Google Scholar
Donahue, J. F. (2004) The Roman Community at Table during the Principate. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Donini, P. (1974) Tre studi sull’ aristotelismo nel II secolo d. C. (Historica, Politica, Philosophica. Il Pensiero Antico). Turin.Google Scholar
Donini, P. (1982) Le scuole, l’anima, l’impero: la filosofia antica da Antioco a Plotino. Turin.Google Scholar
Donini, P. (1986) “Lo scetticismo academico, Aristotele e l’unità della tradizione platonica secondo Plutarco”, in Cambiano (ed.), G., Storiografia e dossografia nella filosofia antica (Biblioteca storico-filosofica, 2). Turin, 203–226.Google Scholar
Donini, P. (1988) “The history of the concept of eclecticism”, in Dillon, and Long, (1988), 15–33.Google Scholar
Donini, P. (1994a) “Plutarco e la rinascita del platonismo”, in Lo spazio letterario della Grecia antica I. Pt. 3. Rome, 35–60.Google Scholar
Donini, P. (1994b) “Testi e commenti, manuali e insegnamento: la forma sistematica e i metodi della filosofia in età postellenistica”, ANRW II.36.7: 5027–5100.Google Scholar
Donini, P. (2002) “L’eredità academica e i fondamenti del platonismo in Plutarco”, in M. Barbanti, G. R. Giardina, and P. Manganaro (eds.), Ἕνωσις καὶ φιλία. Unione e amicizia. Omaggio a Francesco Romano. Catania, 247–273.Google Scholar
Donini, P. (2009) “Il silenzio di Epaminonda, i demoni e il mito: il platonismo di Plutarco nel De genio Socratis”, in Bonazzi, and Opsomer, (2009), 187–214.Google Scholar
Donini, P. (2011) Commentary and Tradition: Aristotelianism, Platonism, and Post-Hellenistic Philosophy (Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca et Byzantina, Quellen und Studien, 4). Berlin.Google Scholar
Döring, K. (1979) Exemplum Socratis: Studien zur Sokratesnachwirkung in der kynisch-stoischen Popularphilosophie der frühen Kaiserzeit und im frühen Christentum. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Dörrie, H. (1969) “Le platonisme de Plutarque”, Association Guillaume Budé. Actes du VIIIe congrès (Paris, 5–10 avril 1968), 519–530.Google Scholar
Dörrie, H. (1971) “Die Stellung Plutarchs im Platonismus seiner Zeit”, in Palmer, R. and Hamerton-Kelly (eds.), R., Philomathes: Studies and Essays in the Humanities in Memory of Philip Merlan. The Hague, 36–56.Google Scholar
Dörrie, H. (1983) “Der ‘Weise vom Roten Meer’: Eine Okkulte Offenbarung durch Plutarch als Plagiat entlarvt”, in P. Händel and W. Meid (eds.), Festschrift für Robert Muth. Innsbruck, 95–110.Google Scholar
Dörrie, H. and Baltes, M. (1998) Die philosophische Lehre des Platonismus. Einige grundlegende Axiome/Platonische Physik (im antiken Verständnis). Vol. II. Bausteine, 125–150. Text, Übersetzung, Kommentar. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Dover, K. J. (1997) The Evolution of Greek Prose Style. New York.Google Scholar
Dronkers, A. (1892) De comparationibus et metaphoris apud Plutarchum. Utrecht.Google Scholar
Dryden, J. (1678) All for Love: or, The World Well Lost. London.Google Scholar
Duff, T. E. (1997) “Moral ambiguity in Plutarch’s Lysander–Sulla”, in Mossman (1997a), 169–187.Google Scholar
Duff, T. (1999a) Plutarch’s Lives: Exploring Virtue and Vice. Oxford.Google Scholar
Duff, T. (1999b) “Plutarch, Plato and ‘great natures’”, in Pérez Jiménez, García López, and Aguilar (1999), 313–332.Google Scholar
Duff, T. (2000) “Plutarchan synkrisis: comparisons and contradictions”, in Van der Stockt (2000b), 141–161.Google Scholar
Duff, T. (2001) “The prologue to the Lives of Perikles and Fabius”, in Pérez Jiménez and Casadesús Bordoy (2001), 351–363.Google Scholar
Duff, T. (2003) “Plutarch on the childhood of Alcibiades (Alk. 2–3)”, PCPhS 49: 89–117.Google Scholar
Duff, T. (2004) “Plato, tragedy, the ideal reader and Plutarch’s Demetrios and Antony”, Hermes 132: 271–291.Google Scholar
Duff, T. (2005) Review of Stadter and Van der Stockt (2002), CR 55: 462–465.Google Scholar
Duff, T. (2007–8) “Plutarch’s readers and the moralism of the Lives”, Ploutarchos 5: 3–18.Google Scholar
Duff, T. (2008a) “How Lives begin”, in Nikolaidis (2008), 187–207.Google Scholar
Duff, T. (2008b) “Models of education in Plutarch”, JHS 128: 1–26.Google Scholar
Duff, T. (2008c) “The opening of Plutarch’s Life of Themistokles”, GRBS 48: 159–179.Google Scholar
Duff, T. (2009) “Plato’s Symposium and Plutarch’s Alcibiades”, in Ribeiro Ferreira et al. (2009), 37–50.Google Scholar
Duff, T. (2010a) “Il linguaggio della narrazione in Plutarco”, in Zanetto, G. and Martinelli, S. (eds.), Plutarco: lingua e testa. Milan, 207–224.Google Scholar
Duff, T. (2010b) “Plutarch’s Themistocles and Camillus”, in Humble (2010b), 45–86.Google Scholar
Duff, T. (2011a) “Platonic allusion in Plutarch’s Alcibiades 4–7”, in P. Millet, S. Oakley, and R. Thompson (eds.), Ratio et Res Ipsa: Classical Essays Presented by Former Pupils to James Diggle on His Retirement (PCPhS suppl. vol 36). Cambridge, 27–43.Google Scholar
Duff, T. (2011b) “Plutarch’s Lives and the critical reader”, in Roskam and Van der Stockt (2011), 59–82.Google Scholar
Duff, T. (2011c) “The structure of the Plutarchan book”, ClAnt 30: 213–278.Google Scholar
Duff, T. (2014) “The prologues”, in Beck (2014a), 333–349.Google Scholar
Duff, T. (2015) “Aspect and subordination in Plutarch’s narrative”, in Ash, Mossman, and Titchener (2015), 129–148.Google Scholar
Duff, T. (2017) “Plutarch and tense: the present and imperfect”, in Georgiadou and Oikonomopoulou (2017), 55–66.Google Scholar
Duff, T. (ed.) (forthcoming) Oxford Readings in Ancient Biography. Oxford.Google Scholar
Duff, T. E. and Chrysanthou, C. (eds.) (forthcoming) Generic Enrichment in Plutarch’s Lives. London.Google Scholar
Duff, T. E. and Fletcher, L. E. (eds.) (forthcoming) Herodotus and Plutarch.Google Scholar
Duffy, J. (2006) “Dealing with the Psellos Corpus: from Allatius to Westerink and the Bibliotheca Teubneriana”, in Barbour, C. and Jenkins, D. (eds.), Reading Michael Psellos. Leiden, 1–11.Google Scholar
Dumont, J. (2001) Les animaux dans l’Antiquité grecque. Paris.Google Scholar
Dunbabin, K. (1991) “Triclinium and Stibadium”, in Slater (1991), 121–148.Google Scholar
Dunbabin, K. (1995) “Scenes from the Roman convivium: frigida non derit, non derit calda petenti (Martial XIV.105)”, in Murray and Tecuşan (1995), 252–265.Google Scholar
Dunbabin, K. (2003) The Roman Banquet: Images of Conviviality. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Dupont, F. (1989) La vie quotidienne du citoyen romain sous la république, Paris.Google Scholar
Dupont, F. (1992) Daily Life in Ancient Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar
Dupont, F. (1999) “De l’oeuf à la pomme: la cena romaine”, in Flandrin, and Cobbi, (1999), 59–86.Google Scholar
Düring, I. (1957) Aristotle in the Ancient Biographic Tradition. Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Edelman, C. (2019) “Plutarch and Montaigne”, in Xenophontos and Oikonomopoulou (2019), 479–492.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. (1993) The Politics of Immorality in Ancient Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Edwards, G. (2016) “The purpose of Porphyry’s rational animals: a dialectical attack on the Stoics in On Abstinence from Animal Food”, in Sorabji, R. (ed.), Aristotle Re-Interpreted: New Findings on Seven Hundred Years of the Ancient Commentators. London, 263–290.Google Scholar
Ehlers, W. (ed.) (1998) La Biographie antique. (Entretiens Hardt, XLIV). Geneva.Google Scholar
Eichel-Lojkine, P. (2001) Le siècle des grands hommes: les recueils de vies d’hommes illustres au XVIème siècle. Louvain.Google Scholar
Eidinow, J. (1990) “A note on Horace, Epistles 1. 2.26 and 2. 2.75”, CQ 40: 566–568.Google Scholar
Elsmann, T. (1994) Untersuchungen zur Rezeption der Institutio Traiani. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, T. (1996) “Plutarch to Prince Philopappus on how to tell a flatterer from a friend”, in Fitzgerald, J. (ed.), Friendship, Flattery and Frankness of Speech: Studies on Friendship in the New Testament World. Leiden, 61–79.Google Scholar
Erbse, H. (1956) “Die Bedeutung der Synkrisis in den Parallelbiographien Plutarchs”, Hermes 84: 398–424.Google Scholar
Erikson, E. (1958) Young Man Luther. New York.Google Scholar
Erskine, A. (2001) Troy between Greece and Rome: Local Tradition and Imperial Power. Oxford.Google Scholar
Evans, G. Blakemore (1997) The Riverside Shakespeare, 2nd ed. Boston.Google Scholar
Evans, R. C. (2001) “Flattery in Shakespeare’s Othello: the relevance of Plutarch and Sir Thomas Elyot”, Comparative Drama 35: 1–41.Google Scholar
Fedalto, G. (2007) Simone Atumano: Monaco di Studio, arcivescovo latino di Tebe. Secolo XIV. Brescia.Google Scholar
Fern, ández Delgado, J. A. (2000) “Le Gryllus, une éthopée parodique”, in Van der Stockt (2000b), 171–182.Google Scholar
Fernández Delgado, J. A. and Pardo, F. Pordomingo (eds.) (1996) Estudios sobre Plutarco: Aspectos Formales. Madrid.Google Scholar
Fernoux, H. (2011) Le demos et la cité: communautés et assemblées populaires en Asie Mineure à l’époque impériale. Rennes.Google Scholar
Ferrari, F. (1995) Dio, idee e materia: La struttura del cosmo in Plutarco di Cheronea. Naples.Google Scholar
Ferrari, F. (1996) “Dio: padre e artefice. La theologia di Plutarco in Plat. Quaest. 2”, in Gallo (1996), 395–409.Google Scholar
Ferrari, F. (1998) “Plutarco in Siriano, in Arist. Metaph. 105,36ss.: lo statuto ontologico e la collocazione metafisica delle idee”, in Gallo (1998a), 143–159.Google Scholar
Ferrari, F. (2000) “Platonismus und Tradition”, in Erler, M. and Graeser, A. (eds.), Philosophen des Altertums. Darmstadt, 109–127.Google Scholar
Ferrari, F. (2002) “La trascendenza razionale: il principio secondo Plutarco”, in Calabi, F. (ed.), Arrhetos Theos: L’ineffabilità del primo principio nel medio platonismo. Pisa, 77–91.Google Scholar
Ferrari, F. (2003) “Causa paradigmatica e causa efficiente: il ruolo delle idee nel Timeo”, in Natali, C. and Maso, S. (eds.), Plato physicus: Cosmologia e antropologia nel Timeo. Amsterdam, 83–96.Google Scholar
Ferrari, F. (2005) Dottrina delle idee nel medioplatonismo, in Fronterotta, F. and Leszl, W. (eds.), Eidos – Idea. Platone, Aristotele e la tradizione Platonica. Sankt Augustin, 233–247.Google Scholar
Ferrari, F. (2007–8) “La chora nel Timeo di Platone: Riflessioni su ‘materia’ e ‘spazio’ nell’ontologia del mondo fenoménico”, Quaestio 7: 3–23.Google Scholar
Ferrari, F. and Baldi, L. (eds.) (2002) Plutarco: La generazione dell’anima nel Timeo (CPM 37). Naples.Google Scholar
Fields, D. (2008) “Aristides and Plutarch on self-praise”, in Harris, and Holmes, (2008), 151–172.Google Scholar
Figueira, T. and Nagy, G. (eds.) (1985) Theognis of Megara: Poetry and the Polis. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. (2016) Variety: The Life of a Roman Concept. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Flacelière, R. (1934) “De pythiae oraculis 409bc”, RPh 8: 56–66.Google Scholar
Flacelière, R. (1936) “Avec Plutarque à Delphes”, BAGB 51: 47.Google Scholar
Flacelière, R. and Chambry, E. (eds.) (1972) Plutarque Vies. Vol. III: Périclès-Fabius Maximus – Alcibiade-Coriolan. Paris.Google Scholar
Flacelière, R., Chambry, E., and Juneaux, M. (eds.) (1964) Plutarque Vies. Vol. 1: Thésée-Romulus – Lycurgue-Numa. Paris.Google Scholar
Flacelière, R., J. Irigoin, J. Sirinelli, and A. Philippon (eds.) (1987) Plutarque. Oeuvres morales. Vol. I.1 (Paris).Google Scholar
Flandrin, J. and J. Cobbi (eds.) (1999) Tables d’hier, tables d'ailleurs: Histoire et ethnologie du repas. Paris.Google Scholar
Fletcher, L. E. (2017) “Narrative time and space in Plutarch’s Life of Nikias”, in Georgiadou and Oikonomopoulou (2017).Google Scholar
Fletcher, L. E. (forthcoming) “History and tragedy in Plutarch’s Nicias”, in Duff and Chrysanthou (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Fletcher, R. and Hanink, J. (eds.) (2016) Creative Lives in Classical Antiquity: Poets, Artists and Biography. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Florio, J. (trans.) (1603) The Essayes or Morall, Politike and Millitarie Discourses of Lord Michaell de Montaigne. London.Google Scholar
Focke, F. (1923) “Synkrisis”, Hermes 58: 327–368.Google Scholar
Fögen, T. (2007) “Antike Zeugnisse zu Kommunikationsformen von Tieren”, A&A 53: 39–75.Google Scholar
Fögen, T. (ed.) (2009a) Tears in the Graeco-Roman World. Berlin.Google Scholar
Fögen, T. (2009b) “The implications of animal nomenclature in Aelian’s De natura animalium”, RhM 152: 49–62.Google Scholar
Fögen, T. (2014) “Animal communication”, in Campbell (2014), 216–232.Google Scholar
Fögen, T. (2017a) “Animals in Greco-Roman antiquity: a select bibliography”, in Fögen and Thomas (2017), 435–474.Google Scholar
Fögen, T. (2017b) “Lives in interaction: animal ‘biographies’ in Graeco-Roman literature?” in Fögen and Thomas (2017), 89–138.Google Scholar
Fögen, T. and Thomas, E. (eds.) (2017) Interactions between Animals and Humans in Graeco-Roman Antiquity. Berlin.Google Scholar
Follet, S. (1972) “Flavius Euphanès d’ Athènes, ami de Plutarque”, in Bader, F. (ed.), Mélanges de linguistique et de philologie grecques offerts à Pierre Chantraine. Paris, 35–50.Google Scholar
Fontanella, F. (2008) “The encomium on Rome as a response to Polybius’ doubts about the Roman Empire”, in Harris, and Holmes, (2008), 203–216.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1984) Histoire de la sexualité. Vol. III: Le souci de soi. Paris.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1990) The History of Sexuality. Vol. III: The Care of the Self. Trans. R. Hurley. London.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2001) Fearless Speech. Trans. J. Pearson. Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
Fox, M. (1993) “History and rhetoric in Dionysius of Halicarnassus”, JRS 83: 31–47.Google Scholar
Fraisse, J.-C. (1974) Philia: La notion d’amitié dans la philosophie antique. Paris.Google Scholar
Franco, C. (2017) “Greek and Latin words for human–animal bonds: metaphors and taboos”, in Fögen and Thomas (2017), 39–60.Google Scholar
Frazier, F. (1988) “A propos de la ‘philotimia’ dans les Vies: quelques jalons dans l’histoire d’ une notion”, RPh 62, 109–127.Google Scholar
Frazier, F. (1992) “Contribution à l’étude de la composition des Vies de Plutarque: l’élaboration des grandes scenes”, ANRW II.33.6: 4487–4535.Google Scholar
Frazier, F. (1996) Histoire et Morale dans les Vies parallèles de Plutarque. Paris.Google Scholar
Frazier, F. (1998) “Théorie et pratique de la παιδιά symposiaque dans le Propos de Table de Plutarque”, in Trédé, M. and Hoffmann, P. (eds.), Le Rire des anciens: Actes du Colloque International (Université de Rouen, École normale supérieure, 11–13 janvier 1995). Paris, 281–292.Google Scholar
Frazier, F. (2005) “La ‘prouesse de Camma’ et la fonction des exempla dans le Dialogue Sur l’Amour”, in Pérez Jiménez and Titchener (2005), 197–212.Google Scholar
Frazier, F. (2005–6) “L’Érotikos, un éloge du Dieu Éros? Une relecture du dialogue de Plutarque”, Ploutarchos 3: 63–102.Google Scholar
Frazier, F. (2008a) “Éros, Arès et Aphrodite dans l’Érotikos: Une reconsidération de la réponse à Pemptidès (ch. 13–18)”, in J. Ribeiro Ferreira, L. Van der Stockt, and M. do Céu Fialho (eds.), Philosophy in Society. Virtues and Values in Plutarch. Leuven & Coimbra, 117–136.Google Scholar
Frazier, F. (2008b) “Le Trésor des Morales de Plutarque de François Le Tort”, in Guerrier (2008), 71–86.Google Scholar
Frazier, F. (2008c) “Philosophie et religion dans la pensée de Plutarque: Quelques réflexions autour des emplois du mot πίστις”, Éplaton 5: 41–61.Google Scholar
Frazier, F. (2008d) Plutarque. Érotikos. Dialogue sur l’Amour. Paris.Google Scholar
Frazier, F. (2011) “Autour du miroir: Les miroitements d’une image dans l’oeuvre de Plutarque”, in Roskam and Van der Stockt (2011), 297–326.Google Scholar
Frazier, F. (2014a) “The perils of ambition”, in Beck (2014a), 488–502.Google Scholar
Frazier, F. (2014b) “The reception of Plutarch in France after the Renaissance”, in Beck (2014a), 549–555.Google Scholar
Frazier, F. (2020) Quelques aspects du platonisme de Plutarque. Philosopher en commun, tourner sa pensée vers Dieu. Ed. L. Roig Lanzillotta. (Brill’s Plutarch Studies, vol. 4). Leiden.Google Scholar
Frazier, F. and Guerrier, O. (2019) “Plutarch’s French translation by Amyot”, in Xenophontos and Oikonomopoulou (2019), 421–435.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1999) “Epilogue”, in Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J., and Schofield, M. (eds.), Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge, 771–797.Google Scholar
French, P. and St Clair, W. (eds.) (2002) Mapping Lives: The Uses of Biography. Oxford.Google Scholar
Froidefond, C. (ed.) (1988) Plutarque: Oeuvres morales. Vol. V.II: Isis et Osiris. Paris.Google Scholar
Fryde, E. (1983) Humanism and Renaissance Historiography. London.Google Scholar
Fryde, E. (1988) “The first humanistic life of Aristotle: the ‘Vita Aristotelis’ of Leonardo Bruni”, in Denley, P. and Elam, C. (eds.), Florence and Italy: Renaissance Studies in Honour of Nicolai Rubinstein. London, 285–296.Google Scholar
Fryde, E. (2000) The Early Palaeologan Renaissance (1261–c.1360). Leiden.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, F. (1964) Les Images de Plutarque. Paris.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, F. (ed.) (1972) Plutarque: Oeuvres Morales. Vol. IX.1: Propos de Table (Livres I–III). Paris.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, F. (ed.) (1978) Plutarque: Oeuvres Morales. Vol. IX.2: Propos de Table (Livres IV–VI). Paris.Google Scholar
Funck, B. (1981) “Studie zu der Bezeichnung bárbaros”, in Welskopf (ed.), E., Soziale Typenbegriffe im alten Griechenland und ihr Fortleben in den Sprachen der Welt. Vol. IV. Berlin, 26–51.Google Scholar
Fuscagni, S. (ed.) (1989) Plutarco Vite Paralle: Cimone (introduzione, traduzione e note di S. Fuscagni), Lucullo (introduzione e note di B. Scardigli; traduzione di B. Mugelli). Milan.Google Scholar
Fyrigos, A. (1989) “Barlaam e Petrarca”, Studi Petrarcheschi 6: 179–200.Google Scholar
Gallarte, I. M. (2008) “El judaísmo en las Vitae y Moralia de Plutarco”, in Nikolaidis (2008), 815–830.Google Scholar
Gallo, I. (ed.) (1988) Sulla tradizione manoscritta dei Moralia di Plutarco. Salerno.Google Scholar
Gallo, I. (ed.) (1992) Plutarco e le scienze. Genoa.Google Scholar
Gallo, I. (ed.) (1996) Plutarco e la religione: Atti del VI Convegno plutarcheo (Ravello, 29–31 maggio, 1995). Naples.Google Scholar
Gallo, I. (ed.) (1998a) L’eredità culturale di Plutarco dall’Antichità al Rinascimento. Naples.Google Scholar
Gallo, I. (1998b) “Forma letteraria nei Moralia di Plutarco: Aspetti e problemi”, ANRW II.34.4: 3511–3540.Google Scholar
Gallo, I. and C. Moreschini (eds.) (2000) I generi letterari in Plutarco. Atti del VIII Convegno plutarcheo, Pisa, 2-4 giugno 1999. Naples.Google Scholar
Gallo, I. and Scardigli, B. (eds.) (1995) Teoria e prassi politica nelle opere di Plutarco: Atti del V Convegno plutarcheo (Certosa di Pontignano, 7–9 giugno 1993). Naples.Google Scholar
García Gual, C. (1988) “Cartas de consuelo al desterrado: Plutarco y fray Antonio de Guevara. Imitación al contraste”, 1616: Annuario de la Socieded Española de Literatura General y Comparada 6–7: 37–41.Google Scholar
García Gual, C. (1991) “Plutarco y Guevara”, in García López and Calderón Dorda (1991), 127–142.Google Scholar
García Gual, C. (1998) “El Plutarco de Fray Antonio de Guevara”, in Gallo (1998a), 367–375.Google Scholar
García Gual, C. (2000) “El Plutarco de Fray Antonio de Guevara”, in Castrillo Benito, N. (ed.), La herencia greco-latina en la lengua y literatura castellanas. Burgos, 67–73.Google Scholar
García López, J. and Calderón Dorda, E. (eds.) (1991) Estudios sobre Plutarco: Paisaje y naturaleza. Madrid.Google Scholar
García Moreno, L. (1995) “Roma y los protagonistas de la dominación romana en Grecia en las Vidas paralelas de Plutarco”, in E. Falque and F. Gascó (eds.), Graecia capta: De la conquista de Grecia a la helenización de Roma. Universidad de Huelva, 129–147.Google Scholar
García Moreno, L. (2002) “Filohelenismo y moderación: Garantías según Plutarco de una dominación estable del mundo griego por Roma”, in Ribeiro Ferreira (2002), 261–280.Google Scholar
García Valdés, M. (ed.) (1994) Estudios sobre Plutarco: ideas religiosas: actas del III simposio internacional sobre Plutarco, Oviedo 30 de abril a 2 de mayo de 1992. Madrid.Google Scholar
Garfagnini, G. (1984) “Lo Studium generale regie civitatis Florentie: 1321–1472 (Antologia di documenti)”, Storia dell’ Ateneo fiorentino: Contributi di studio. Vol. I. Florence, 57-107.Google Scholar
Garzya, A. (1988) “La tradizione manoscritta dei Moralia: linee generali”, in Gallo (1988), 9–54.Google Scholar
Garzya, A. (1998) “Plutarco a Bisanzio”, in Gallo (1998a), 15–27.Google Scholar
Gascó, F. (1990) “Maratón, Eurimedonte y Platea (Praec. ger. reip. 814A–C)”, in Pérez Jiménez and del Cerro Calderón (1990), 211–215.Google Scholar
Gefen, A. (2012) “Les écrivains contre Plutarque: détournements, critiques et réécritures des Vies Parallèles aux XIXe et XXe siècles”, in Guerrier (2012), 337–349.Google Scholar
Gehrke, H.-J. (1976) Phokion: Studien zur Erfassung seiner historischen Gestalt. Munich.Google Scholar
Geiger, J. (1979a) “Cornelius Nepos, de regibus exterarum gentium”, Latomus 38: 662–669.Google Scholar
Geiger, J. (1979b) “Munatius Rufus and Thrasea Paetus on Cato the Younger”, Athenaeum 57: 48–72.Google Scholar
Geiger, J. (1981) “Plutarch’s Parallel Lives: the choice of heroes”, Hermes 109: 85–104. Reprinted in Scardigli (1995), 165–190.Google Scholar
Geiger, J. (1985) Cornelius Nepos and Ancient Political Biography. Historia Einzelschriften 47. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Geiger, J. (1999) “Plato, Plutarch, and the death of Socrates and of Cato”, in Pérez Jiménez, García López, and Aguilar (eds.) (1999), 357–364.Google Scholar
Geiger, J. (2017) “Greeks and the Roman past in the Second Sophistic: the case of Plutarch”, in Georgiadou and Oikonomopoulou (2017), 119–125.Google Scholar
Gentili, V. (1991) La Roma antica degli elisabettiani. Bologna.Google Scholar
Georgiadou, A. (1988) “The Lives of the Caesars and Plutarch’s other Lives”, ICS 13: 349–356.Google Scholar
Georgiadou, A. (1997) Plutarch’s Pelopidas: A Historical and Philological Commentary. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Georgiadou, A. (2014) “The Lives of the Caesars”, in Beck (2014a), 251–266.Google Scholar
Georgiadou, A. and Oikonomopoulou, K. (eds.) (2017) Space, Time and Language in Plutarch. Berlin.Google Scholar
Gera, D. (1993) Xenophon’s Cyropaideia: Style, Genre and Literary Technique. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gera, D. (2003) Ancient Greek Ideas on Speech, Language and Civilization. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gera, D. (2007) “Themistocles’ Persian tapestry”, CQ 57: 445–457.Google Scholar
Giannattasio, Andria, R. (2000) “Galba e Otone tra biografia e storia”, in Gallo, and Moreschini, (2000), 81–91.Google Scholar
Giannattasio, A. (2006) “Il proemio del Galba e Otone di Plutarco”, in de Gregorio, G. and Medaglia, S. (eds.), Tradizione, ecdotica, esegesi: miscellanea di studi. Naples, 59–77.Google Scholar
Gigante, M. (1969) Teodoro Metochites, saggio critico su Demostene e Aristide. Milan.Google Scholar
Gigante, M. (1979) Poeti Bizantini di terra d’Otranto nel secolo XIII. Naples.Google Scholar
Gilhus, I. (2006) Animals, Gods and Humans: Changing Attitudes to Animals in Greek, Roman and Early Christian Thought. London.Google Scholar
Gill, C. (1983) “The question of character development: Plutarch and Tacitus”, CQ 33: 469–487.Google Scholar
Gill, C (1985) “Plato and the education of character”, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 67: 1–26.Google Scholar
Gill, C (1986) “The question of character and personality in Greek tragedy”, Poetics Today 7: 251–273.Google Scholar
Gill, C (1988) “Personhood and personality: the four personae theory in Cicero, De officiis I”, OSAPh 5: 169–199.Google Scholar
Gill, C (1990) “The character–personality distinction”, in Pelling (1990c), 1–31.Google Scholar
Gill, C (1996) Personality in Greek Epic, Tragedy, and Philosophy: The Self in Dialogue. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gill, C (2006) The Structured Self in Hellenistic and Roman Thought. Oxford.Google Scholar
Giustiniani, V. (1961) “Sulle traduzioni latine delle ‘Vite’ di Plutarco nel Quattrocento”, Rinascimento 1: 3–62.Google Scholar
Giustiniani, V. (1979) “Plutarch und die Humanistische Ethik”, in Rüegg, W. and Wuttke, D. (eds.), Ethik im Humanismus. Boppard, 45–62.Google Scholar
Gleason, M. (1995) Making Men: Sophists and Self-Presentation in Ancient Rome. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Gleason, M. (2006) “Greek cities under Roman rule”, in Potter (ed.), D., A Companion to the Roman Empire. Oxford, 228–249.Google Scholar
Glucker, J. (1978) Antiochus and the Late Academy (Hypomnemata, 56). Göttingen.Google Scholar
Gnauk, R (1936) Die Bedeutung des Marius und Cato maior für Cicero. Berlin.Google Scholar
Goar, R. (1987) The Legend of Cato Uticensis from the First Century B.C. to the Fifth Century A.D. Brussels.Google Scholar
Goessler, L. (1962) Plutarchs Gedanken über die Ehe. Zürich. English translation of 44–69 in Pomeroy (1999a), 97–115.Google Scholar
Goguey, D. (2003) Les animaux dans la mentalité romain. Brussels.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (1995) Foucault’s Virginity: Ancient Erotic Fiction and the History of Sexuality. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (1999) “Body/politics: is there a history of reading?” in Falkner, T., Felson, N., and Konstan, D. (eds.), Contextualising Classics: Ideology, Performance, Dialogue. Essays in Honor of John J. Peradotto. Lanham, MD, 89–20.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (2001a) “Introduction: setting an agenda – ‘everything is Greece to the wise’”, in Goldhill (2001b), 1–25.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (ed.) (2001b) Being Greek Under Rome: Cultural Identity, the Second Sophistic and the Development of Empire. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (2002) “The value of Greek: Why save Plutarch?” in S. Goldhill, Who Needs Greek? Contests in the Cultural History of Hellenism. Cambridge, 246–293.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (2008) The End of Dialogue in Antiquity. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Goleman, D. (1995) Emotional Intelligence. New York.Google Scholar
Goleman, D. (2001) “What makes a leader?” in W. Rosenbach and R. Taylor (eds.) Contemporary Issues in Leadership, 5th ed. Boulder, CO, 5–18.Google Scholar
Gómez, P. and Mestre, F. (2009) “The banquets of Alexander”, in Ribeiro Ferreira et al. (2009), 211–222.Google Scholar
Gómez Cardó, P., Leão, D., and de Oliveira Silva, M. (eds.) (2014) Plutarco entre mundos: visões de Esparta, Atenas e Roma. Coimbra.Google Scholar
Gomme, A. (1945) A Historical Commentary on Thucydides: Vol. I. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gontier, T. (1999) L’homme et l’animal. La philosophie antique. Paris.Google Scholar
González González, M. (2019) “Who should be sacrificed? Human sacrifice and status in Plutarch: Themistocles 13, Pelopidas 21–22, Philopoemen 21”, Arethusa 52: 165–179.Google Scholar
Görgemanns, H. (2005) “Eros als Gott in Plutarchs Amatorius”, in Hirsch-Luipold (2005), 169–195.Google Scholar
Görgemanns, H. (ed.) (2006) Plutarch: Dialog über die Liebe. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Görgemanns, H. (ed.) (2011) Plutarch: Dialog über die Liebe, 2nd ed. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Gorman, R. and Gorman, V. (2007) “The tryphê of the Sybarites: a historiographical problem in Athenaeus”, JHS 127: 38–60.Google Scholar
Gorman, R. and Gorman, V. (2014) Corrupting Luxury in Ancient Greek Literature. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Gossage, A. (1967) “Plutarch”, in Dorey, T. (ed.), Latin Biography. London, 45–77.Google Scholar
Goulet-Cazé, M.-O. (1996) “Religion and the early Cynics”, in Branham and Goulet-Cazé (1996), 47–80.Google Scholar
Gouma-Peterson, T. (ed.) (2000) Anna Komnene and Her Times. New York.Google Scholar
Gowers, E. (1993) The Loaded Table: Representations of Food in Roman Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar
Grassl, H. (1982) “Arrian im Donauraum”, Chiron 12: 245–252.Google Scholar
Graves, W. (1973) “Plutarch’s Life of Cato Utican as a major source of Othello”, Shakespeare Quarterly 24: 181–187.Google Scholar
Gray, V. (1992) “Xenophon’s Symposion: the display of wisdom”, Hermes 120: 58–75.Google Scholar
Gray, V. (1998) The Framing of Socrates: The Literary Interpretation of Xenophon’s Memorabilia. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Graziosi, B. (2002) Inventing Homer. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gréard, O. (1880) De la morale de Plutarque, 3rd ed. Paris.Google Scholar
Green, D. (1979) Plutarch Revisited: A Study of Shakespeare’s Last Roman Plays and Their Source. Salzburg.Google Scholar
Grévin, J. (1971) César, ed. Ginsberg, E.. Geneva.Google Scholar
Gribble, D. (1999) Alcibiades and Athens: A Study in Literary Presentation. Oxford.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. (2009) “Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar and the dramatic tradition”, in Griffin, M. (ed.), A Companion to Julius Caesar. Oxford, 371–398.Google Scholar
Griffith, M. (2006) “Horsepower and donkeywork: equids and the ancient Greek imagination. Part Two”, CPh 101: 307–358.Google Scholar
Griffiths, G., Hankins, J., and Thompson, D. (1987) The Humanism of Leonardo Bruni. Binghamton, NY.Google Scholar
Griffiths, J. G. (ed.) (1970) Plutarch’s De Iside et Osiride. Cardiff.Google Scholar
Griffiths, R. (1970) The Dramatic Technique of Antoine de Montchrestien: Rhetoric and Style in French Renaissance Tragedy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Grimaldi, M. (ed.) (2004) Plutarco: La Malignità di Erodoto. Naples.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. (1992) Culture and National Identity in Republican Rome. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Grünbart, M. (2019) “Plutarch in twelfth-century learned culture”, in Xenophontos and Oikonomopoulou (2019), 265–278.Google Scholar
Guerrier, O. (ed.) (2008) Moralia et Oeuvres Morales à la Renaissance: Actes du Colloque International de Toulouse (19–21 mai 2005). Paris.Google Scholar
Guerrier, O. (ed.) (2012) Plutarque de l’age Classique au XIXe siècle: presences, interferences et dynamique. Actes du colloque internationale de Toulouse (13–15 mai 2009). Grenoble.Google Scholar
Guerrier, O. (2014) “The Renaissance in France: Amyot and Montaigne”, in Beck (2014a), 544–558.Google Scholar
Guilland, R. (ed.) (1967) Correspondance de Nicéphore Grégoras. Paris.Google Scholar
Guillén Selfa, L. (1997) “Plutarco: moralidad y tragedia”, in Schrader, Ramón, and Vela (1997), 241–253.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. (1992) La citadelle intérieure: Introduction aux Pensées de Marc Aurèle. Paris.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. (1995) Qu’est-ce que la philosophie antique? Paris.Google Scholar
Hägg, T. (2012) The Art of Biography in Antiquity. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Haldon, J. (1990) Byzantium in the Seventh Century: The Transformation of a Culture. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Halfmann, H. (1979) Die Senatoren aus dem östlichen Teil des Imperium Romanum bis zum Ende des 2. Jahrhunderts n.Chr. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Halfmann, H. (2002) “Die Selbstverwaltung der kaiserzeitlichen Polis in Plutarchs Schrift Praecepta gerendae rei publicae”, Chiron 32: 83–95.Google Scholar
Hall, E. (1989) Inventing the Barbarian: Greek Self-Definition through Tragedy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hall, E. (1993) “Asia unmanned: images of victory in classical Athens”, in Rich and Shipley (1993), 108–133.Google Scholar
Hall, E. (1995) “The ass with the double vision: politicizing an ancient Greek novel”, in Margolies, D. and Joannou (eds.), M., Heart of the Heartless World: Essays in Cultural Resistance in Memory of Margot Heinemann. London, 47–59.Google Scholar
Hall, E. (ed.) (1996) Aeschylus: Persians. Warminster.Google Scholar
Hall, J. (1997) Ethnic Identity in Greek Antiquity. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (1990) “Traditional Greek conceptions of character”, in Pelling (1990c), 32–59.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (2002) The Aesthetics of Mimesis: Ancient texts and Modern Problems. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Hamilton, C. D. (1992) “Plutarch’s ‘Life of Agesilaus’”, ANRW II. 33.6: 4201–4221.Google Scholar
Hamilton, C. D. (1994) “Plutarch and Xenophon on Agesilaus”, AncW 25: 205–212.Google Scholar
Hamilton, J. (1969) Plutarch, Alexander: A Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hankins, J. (ed.) (2000) Renaissance Civic Humanism: Reappraisals and Reflections. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hankins, J. (2002) “Chrysoloras and the Greek Studies of Leonardo Bruni”, in Maisano, and Rollo, (2002), 175–197.Google Scholar
Hansen, W. (2004) Classical Mythology: A Guide to the Mythical World of the Greeks and Romans. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (1992) “Plutarch and the interpretation of myth”, ANRW II.33.6: 4743–4787.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (1996) “Sign language in ‘On the Sign of Socrates’”, in Van der Stockt (1996), 123–136.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (1997) “Fifth-century Athenian and Augustan images of the barbarian Other”, Classics Ireland 4: 46–56.Google Scholar
Harris, W. (1979) War and Imperialism in Republican Rome 327–70 BC. Oxford.Google Scholar
Harris, W. (2001) Restraining Rage: The Ideology of Anger Control in Classical Antiquity. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Harris, W. V. and Holmes, B. (eds.) (2008) Aelius Aristides between Greece, Rome, and the Gods. Leiden.Google Scholar
Harrison, G. (1991) “The critical trends in scholarship on the non-philosophical works in Plutarch’s Moralia”, ANRW II.33.6: 4646–4681.Google Scholar
Harrison, G. (1995) “The semiotics of Plutarch’s Σύγκρισις: the Hellenistic lives of Demetrius – Antony and Agesilaus – Pompey”, RBPhH 73: 91–104.Google Scholar
Harrison, G. (2000) “Problems with the genre of problems: Plutarch’s literary innovations”, CPh 95: 193–199.Google Scholar
Harrison, T. (ed.) (2002) Greeks and Barbarians. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Hartog, F. (2005) Anciens, Modernes, Sauvages. Paris.Google Scholar
Harvey, D. (1999) “Bibliography of Plutarch’s Advice and Consolation”, in Pomeroy (1999a), 197–215.Google Scholar
Hastings, M. (2009) Finest Years: Churchill as Warlord 1940–45. London.Google Scholar
Hawtree, L. (2014) “Animals in epic”, in Campbell (2014), 73–83.Google Scholar
Heath, J. (2005) The Talking Greeks: Speech, Animals, and the Other in Homer, Aeschylus, and Plato. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Heath, M. (1998) “Caecilius, Longinus and Photius”, GRBS 39: 271–292.Google Scholar
Heath, M. (2008) “Aristotle on natural slavery”, Phronesis 53: 243–270.Google Scholar
Hein, A. (1914) De optativi apud Plutarchum usu. Trebnitz.Google Scholar
Helmbold, W. (ed. and trans.) (1939) Plutarch’s Moralia. Vol. VI. 439A–523B. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Helmbold, W. and O’Neil, E. (1959) Plutarch’s Quotations. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Helmig, C. (2008) “Plutarch of Chaeronea and Porphyry on transmigration – who is the author of Stobaeus I 445.14–448.3 (W.-H)?” CQ 58: 250–255.Google Scholar
Herchenroeder, L. (2008) “Τί γὰρ τοῦτο πρὸς τὸν λόγον; Plutarch’s Gryllus and the so-called grylloi”, AJPh 129: 347–379.Google Scholar
Herrero Salgado, F. (1994) “Plutarco y la oratoria sagrada del siglo de oro,” in García Valdés, (1994),371–380.Google Scholar
Hershbell, J. (1987) “Plutarch’s de animae procreatione in Timaeo: an analysis of structure and content”, ANRW II.36.1: 234–247.Google Scholar
Hershbell, J. (1988) “Plutarch’s portrait of Socrates”, ICS 13: 365–381.Google Scholar
Hershbell, J. (1992a) “Plutarch and Epicureanism”, ANRW II.36.5: 3353–3383.Google Scholar
Hershbell, J. (1992b) “Plutarch and Stoicism”, ANRW II. 36.5: 3336–3352.Google Scholar
Hershbell, J. (1993) “Plutarch and Herodotus: the beetle in the rose”, RhM 136: 143–163.Google Scholar
Hershbell, J. (2004) “Plutarch’s political philosophy: Peripatetic and Platonic”, in de Blois et al. (2004), 151–162.Google Scholar
Heuer, H. (1957) “From Plutarch to Shakespeare: a study of Coriolanus”, Shakespeare Survey 10: 50–59.Google Scholar
Hijmans, B. Jr., Van der Paardt, R., Schmidt, V., Wesseling, B., and Zimmerman, M. (eds.) (1995) Apuleius Madaurensis. Metamorphoses Book IX: Text, Introduction and Commentary. Groningen.Google Scholar
Hillman, T. (1993) “When did Lucullus retire?” Historia 42: 211–228.Google Scholar
Hillman, T. (1994) “Authorial statements, narrative, and character in Plutarch’s Agesilaus – Pompeius”, GRBS 35: 255–280.Google Scholar
Hillyard, B. (1977) “The medieval tradition of Plutarch, de audiendo”, RHT 7: 1–56.Google Scholar
Hindermann, J. (2011) “Zoophilie in Zoologie und Roman: Sex und Liebe zwischen Mensch und Tier bei Plutarch, Plinius dem Älteren, Aelian und Apuleius”, Dictynna 8. https://doi.org/10.4000/dictynna.717.Google Scholar
Hirsch-Luipold, R. (ed.) (2005) Gott und die Götter bei Plutarch: Götterbilder – Gottesbilder – Weltbilder. Berlin.Google Scholar
Hirsch-Luipold, R. (2014) “Religion and myth”, in Beck (2014a), 163–176.Google Scholar
Hirzel, R. (1895) Der Dialog. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Hirzel, R. (1912) Plutarch. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Hobbs, A. (2000) Plato and the Hero: Courage, Manliness and the Impersonal Good. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hobden, F. (2004) “How to be a good symposiast and other lessons from Xenophon’s Symposium”, The Cambridge Classical Journal 50: 121–140.Google Scholar
Hobden, F. (2005) “Reading Xenophon’s Symposium”, Ramus 34.2: 93–111.Google Scholar
Hobden, F. (2013) The Symposion in Ancient Greek Society and Thought. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Høgel, C. (2002) Symeon Metaphrastes: Rewriting and Canonization. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Höistad, R. (1948) Cynic Hero and Cynic King: Studies in the Cynic Conception of Man. Uppsala.Google Scholar
Holford-Strevens, L. (2003) Aulus Gellius. An Antonine Scholar and His Achievement. Oxford.Google Scholar
Holland, P. (1603) The Philosophie, commonlie called, The Morals […]. London.Google Scholar
Holmes, B. (2008) “Aelius Aristides’ illegible body,” in Harris, and Holmes, (2008), 81–114.Google Scholar
Holtorf, H. (1913) Plutarchi Chaeronensis studia in Platone explicando posita. Diss., University of Greifswald.Google Scholar
Honigmann, E. (1959) “Shakespeare’s Plutarch”, Shakespeare Quarterly 10: 25–33.Google Scholar
Hood, D. (1967) Plutarch and the Persians. Ph.D. diss., University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Hopfner, T. (1940) Plutarch über Isis und Osiris. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Horky, P. (2017) “The spectrum of animal rationality in Plutarch”, Apeiron 50: 103–133.Google Scholar
Horster, M. and Reitz, C. (eds.) (2010) Condensing Texts – Condensed Texts. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Howard-Johnson, J. (1996) “Anna Komnene and the Alexiad”, in Mullett, M. and Smythe, D. (eds.), Alexios I Komnenos. Belfast, 260–301.Google Scholar
Howley, J. (2014) “Heus tu rhetorisce: Gellius, Cicero, Plutarch and Roman study abroad”, in Madsen, J. M. and Rees (eds.), R., Roman Rule in Greek and Latin Writing: Double Vision. Leiden, 163–192.Google Scholar
Hult, K. (ed.) (2002) Theodore Metochites on Ancient Authors and Philosophy: Semeioseis Gnomikai 1–26, 71. Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Humble, N. (2010a) “Parallelism and the humanists”, in Humble (2010b), 237–265.Google Scholar
Humble, N. (2010b) Plutarch’s Lives: Parallelism and Purpose. London.Google Scholar
Humble, N. (2013) “Imitation as commentary? Plutarch and Byzantine historiography in the tenth century”, in Pace and Volpe Cacciatore (2013), 219–225.Google Scholar
Hunger, H. (1969–70) “On the imitation (ΜΙΜΗΣΙΣ) of antiquity in Byzantine literature”, Dumbarton Oaks Papers 23: 15–38.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (2018) The Measure of Homer: The Ancient Reception of the Iliad and the Odyssey. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. and Russell, D. (eds.) (201) Plutarch: How to Study Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. (2018) Plutarch’s Rhythmic Prose. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ianziti, G. (2016) “Pier Candido Decembrio and the Suetonian path to princely biography”, in Baker, et al. (2016), 237–270.Google Scholar
Iglesias Montiel, R. (1991) “La recepción de Plutarco en el Comentario de De la Cerda a las Geórgicas de Virgilio”, in García López and Calderón Dorda (1991), 173–182.Google Scholar
Immerwahr, H. (1960) “Ergon: history as a monument in Herodotus and Thucydides”, AJPh 81: 261–290.Google Scholar
Indelli, G. (1992) “Plutarco, Bruta animalia ratione uti: qualche riflessione”, in Gallo, (1992), 317–352.Google Scholar
Indelli, G. (ed.) (1995) Plutarco. Le Bestie sono esseri razionali. Naples.Google Scholar
Ingenkamp, H. G. (1971) Plutarchs Schriften über die Heilung der Seele (Hypomnemata 34). Göttingen.Google Scholar
Ingenkamp, H. G. (1999) “Ou psegetai to pinein. Wie Plutarch den übermässigen Weingenuss beurteilte”, in Montes Cala et al. (1999), 277–290.Google Scholar
Ingenkamp, H. G. (2016) “De Plutarchi malignitate”, in Opsomer, Roskam, and Titchener (2016), 249–242.Google Scholar
Inglese, L. (2003) “Aspetti della fortuna di Erodoto in Plutarco”, RCCM 45: 221–244.Google Scholar
Innes, D., Hine, H., and Pelling, C. (eds.) (1995) Ethics and Rhetoric: Classical Essays for Donald Russell on His Seventy-Fifth Birthday. Oxford.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (ed.) (2003) The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Irigoin, J. (1976) “Les manuscrits de Plutarque à 32 lignes et à 22 lignes”, in Actes du XIVe Congres International des Etudes Byzantins, Bucarest, 6–12 Septembre 1971. Bucharest, 83–87.Google Scholar
Irigoin, J. (1982–3) “La formation d’un corpus: Un probleme d’histoire des textes dans la tradition des Vies paralleles de Plutarque”, RHT 12–13: 1–13.Google Scholar
Irigoin, J. (1986) “Le catalogue de Lamprias: tradition manuscrite et éditions imprimées”, REG 99: 318–331.Google Scholar
Irigoin, J. (1987) “II. Histoire du texte des Oeuvres Morales de Plutarque,” in Flacelière et al. (1987), ccxxvii–cccx.Google Scholar
Irwin, E. (2006) “The biographies of poets: the case of Solon,” in McGing and Mossman (2006), 13–30.Google Scholar
Isaac, B. (2004) The Invention of Racism in Classical Antiquity. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Isaacson, W. (ed.) (2010) Profiles in Leadership: Historians on the Elusive Quality of Greatness. New York.Google Scholar
Jacob, C. (2013) The Web of Athenaeus. Trans. A. Papaconstantinou. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Jacobs, S. (2018) Plutarch’s Pragmatic Biographies: Lessons for Statesmen and Generals in the Parallel Lives. Leiden.Google Scholar
Jacquemin, A. (1991) “Delphes au IIe siècle après J.-C.: un lieu de mémoire grecque”, in Saïd, S. (ed.), Ellēnismos: quelques jalons pour une histoire de l’identité grecque. Leiden, 217–231.Google Scholar
Jaeger, W. (1945) Paideia: The Ideals of Greek Culture. Vol. I. Oxford.Google Scholar
Jazdzewska, K. (2009–10) “‘Not an innocent spectacle’: hunting and venationes in Plutarch’s De sollertia animalium”, Ploutarchos 7: 35–46.Google Scholar
Jazdzewska, K. (2013) “A skeleton at a banquet: death in Plutarch’s Convivium Septem Sapientium”, Phoenix 67: 301–319.Google Scholar
Jazdzewska, K. (2015a) “Dialogic format of Philo of Alexandria’s De animalibus”, Eos 102: 45–56.Google Scholar
Jazdzewska, K. (2015b) “Tales of two lives in Xenophon’s ‘Hiero,’ Plutarch’s ‘Gryllos,’ and Lucian’s ‘Cock’”, Hermes 143: 141–152.Google Scholar
Jazdzewska, K. (2016) “Laughter in Plutarch’s Convivium Septem Sapientium”, CPh 111: 74–88.Google Scholar
Jehne, M. (1999) “Cato und die Bewahrung der traditionellen res publica. Zum Spannungsverhältnis zwischen mos maiorum und griechischer Kultur im zweiten Jahrhundert v.Chr.”, in Vogt-Spira, G. and Rommel, B. (eds.), Rezeption und Identität. Die kulturelle Auseinandersetzung Roms mit Griechenland als europäisches Paradigma. Stuttgart, 115–134.Google Scholar
Jenkins, R. (1948) “Constantine VII’s portrait of Michael III”, BAB 34.5: 71–77.Google Scholar
Jenkins, R. (1954) “The classical background of the Scriptores Post Theophanem”, Dumbarton Oaks Papers 8: 11–30.Google Scholar
Jenkins, R. (1963) “The Hellenistic origins of Byzantine literature”, Dumbarton Oaks Papers 17: 37–52.Google Scholar
Jennings, V. and Katsaros, A. (eds.) (2007) The World of Ion of Chios. Leiden.Google Scholar
Jones, C. (1966) “Towards a chronology of Plutarch’s works”, JRS 56: 61–74. Reprinted in Scardigli (1995), 95–123.Google Scholar
Jones, C. (1967) “The teacher of Plutarch”, HSPh 71: 205–213.Google Scholar
Jones, C. (1970) “Sura and Senecio”, JRS 60: 98–104.Google Scholar
Jones, C. (1971) Plutarch and Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar
Jones, C. (1974) Review of Russell (1973a), JRS 64: 279–280.Google Scholar
Jones, C. (1978) The Roman World of Dio Chrysostom. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Jones, C. (2004) “Multiple identities in the age of the Second Sophistic”, in Borg (ed.), B., Paideia: The World of the Second Sophistic. Berlin, 13–21.Google Scholar
Jones, R. (1980) The Platonism of Plutarch and Selected Papers (Ancient Philosophy. Editions, Commentaries, Critical Works), with an Introduction by L. Tarán. New York. [Reprint of the author’s thesis, University of Chicago, 1913, originally published in 1916 by G. Banta Pub. Co.]Google Scholar
Jouan, F. (2001) “Quelques réflexions sur Plutarque et la tragédie”, SIFC 95: 186–196.Google Scholar
Jouanna, J., Villard, L., and Béguin, D., D. (eds.) (2002) Vin et santé en Grèce ancienne (Actes du colloque organisé à l’Université de Rouen et à Paris). Paris.Google Scholar
Jouët-Pastré, E. (2002) “Vin, remède et jeu dans les Lois de Platon”, in Jouanna, Villard, and Béguin (2002), 222–232.Google Scholar
Jufresa, M. (1996) “La abstinencia de carne y el origen de la civilización en Plutarco”, in Fernández Delgado and Pordomingo Pardo (1996), 219–226.Google Scholar
Jufresa, M., Mestre, F., Gómez, P., and Gilabert, P. (eds.) (2005) Plutarc a la seva època: paideia i societat (Actas del VIII Simposio Internacional de la Sociedad Española de Plutarquistas, Barcelona, 6–8 nov. 2003). Barcelona.Google Scholar
Jufresa Muñoz, M. (2007) “El amor de los animales en las Vidas Paralelas de Plutarco”, in Nieto Ibáñez and López López (2007), 265–277.Google Scholar
Jung, M. (2006) Marathon und Plataiai: Zwei Perserschlachten als leux de memoire im antiken Griechenland. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Jüthner, J. (1923) Hellenen und Barbaren. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Kahle, M. (2017a) “Giannozzo Manetti: on famous men of great age, ‘Life of Socrates’”, in Baker, (2017), 59–65.Google Scholar
Kahle, M. (2017b) “Spoliating Diogenes Laertius: Gianozzo Manetti’s use(s) of the lives of the philosophers”, in Baker (2017), 38–89.Google Scholar
Kaldellis, A. (1999) The Argument of Psellos’ Chronographia. Leiden.Google Scholar
Kaldellis, A. (2007) Hellenism in Byzantium: The Transformation of Greek Identity and the Reception of the Classical Tradition. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kalimtzis, K. (2012) Taming Anger: The Hellenic Approach to the Limitations of Reason. London.Google Scholar
Kammer, U. (1964) Untersuchungen zu Ciceros Bild von Cato Censorius. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Karamanolis, G. (2006) Plato and Aristotle in Agreement? Platonists on Aristotle from Antiochus to Porphyry. Oxford.Google Scholar
Karpozilos, A. (ed.) (1990) The Letters of Ioannes Mauropous Metropolitan of Euchaita. Thessalonica.Google Scholar
Kassel, R. (1958) Untersuchungen zur griechischen und römischen Konsolationsliteratur. Munich.Google Scholar
Kasulke, C. (2000) “Hadrian und die Jagd im Spiegel der zeitgenössischen Literatur”, in Martini, W. (ed.), Die Jagd der Eliten in den Erinnerungskulturen von der Antike bis in die Frühe Neuzeit. Göttingen, 101–127.Google Scholar
Kazhdan, A. (ed.) (1991) The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kazhdan, A. (2006) A History of Byzantine Literature (850–1000), ed. Angelidi, C.. Athens.Google Scholar
Kazhdan, A. and Wharton Epstein, A. (1985) Change in Byzantine Culture in the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Keaveney, A. (1992) Lucullus: A Life. London.Google Scholar
Kechagia, E. (2011a) “Philosophy in Plutarch’s Table Talk: in jest or in earnest?” in Klotz and Oikonomopoulou (2011a), 77–104.Google Scholar
Kechagia, E. (2011b) Plutarch Against Colotes: A Lesson in History of Philosophy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kechagia-Ovseiko, E. (2014) “Plutarch and Epicureanism”, in Beck (2014a), 104–120.Google Scholar
Keller, A. (1939) “Plutarch and Rousseau’s first Discours”, Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 54.1: 212–222.Google Scholar
Kemezis, A. (2016) “‘Inglorius labor? The rhetoric of glory and utility in Plutarch’s Precepts and Tacitus’ Agricola”, CW 110: 87–117.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. (1972) The Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Kennell, N. (1995) The Gymnasium of Virtue: Education and Culture in Ancient Sparta. Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar
Kessler, E. (1968) Das Problem des frühen Humanismus; seine philosophische Bedeutung bei Coluccio Salutati. Munich.Google Scholar
Kidd, I. (1992) “Introduction” and notes to R. Waterfield (trans.) and Kidd, I. (ed.), Plutarch: Essays. London.Google Scholar
Kienast, D. (1964) “Die Homonoiaverträge in der römischen Kaiserzeit”, JNG 14: 51–64.Google Scholar
Kim, L. (2009) “Historical fiction, brachylogy, and Plutarch’s Banquet of the Seven Sages”, in Ribeiro Ferreira et al. (2009), 481–495.Google Scholar
Kim, L. (2010) “The literary heritage as language: Atticism and the Second Sophistic”, in Bakker, (2010), 468–482.Google Scholar
Kim, L. (2017) “Atticism and Asianism”, in Richter and Johnson (2017), 41–66.Google Scholar
King, C. (trans.) (1908) Plutarch’s Morals: Theosophical Essays. London.Google Scholar
Kingston, R. (2022) Plutarch’s Prism. Classical Reception and Public Humanism in France and England, 1500–1800. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kirk, A. (2017) “Λόγος and φωνή in Odyssey 10 and Plutarch’s Gryllus”, in Slater, N. (ed.), Voice and Voices in Antiquity. Leiden, 397–415.Google Scholar
Kirkland, N. B. (2019) “The character of tradition in Plutarch’s On the Malice of Herodotus”, AJPh 140: 477–511.Google Scholar
Kitchell, K. (2017) “Animal literacy and the Greeks: Philoctetes the Hedgehog and Dolon the Weasel”, in Fögen and Thomas (2017), 183–203.Google Scholar
Kleczkowska, K. (2014) “Those who cannot speak: animals as others in ancient Greek thought”, Maska 24: 97–108.Google Scholar
Kloft, H. and Kerner, M. (1992) Die Institutio Traiani: Ein pseudo-plutarchischer Text im Mittelalter. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Klotz, F. (2007) “Portraits of the philosopher: Plutarch’s self-presentation in the Quaestiones Convivales”, CQ 57: 650–667.Google Scholar
Klotz, F. (2011) “Imagining the past: Plutarch’s play with time”, in Klotz and Oikonomopoulou (2011a), 161–178.Google Scholar
Klotz, F. (2014) “The sympotic works”, in Beck (2014a), 207–222.Google Scholar
Klotz, F. and Oikonomopoulou, K. (eds.) (2011a) The Philosopher’s Banquet: Plutarch’s Table Talk in the Intellectual Culture of the Roman Empire. Oxford.Google Scholar
Klotz, F. and Oikonomopoulou, K. (eds.) (2011b) “Introduction”, in Klotz and Oikonomopoulou (2011a), 1–31.Google Scholar
Klotz, F. and Oikonomopoulou, K. (eds.) (2011c) “Conclusion: reading (from) the Table Talk in Aulus Gellius’ Attic Nights”, in Klotz and Oikonomopoulou (2011a), 233–237.Google Scholar
Kneebone, E. (2008) “Τόσσ’ ἐδάην: the poetics of knowledge in Oppian’s Halieutica”, Ramus 37: 32–59.Google Scholar
Kneebone, E. (2017) “The limits of enquiry in imperial Greek didactic poetry”, in König, J. and Woolf (eds.), G., Authority and Expertise in Ancient Scientific Culture. Cambridge, 203–230.Google Scholar
Knight, G. W. (1965) The Imperial Theme: Further Interpretations of Shakespeare’s Tragedies Including the Roman Plays. London.Google Scholar
Knight, R. (1991) Corneille’s Tragedies: The Role of the Unexpected. Cardiff.Google Scholar
Knox, B. (1964) The Heroic Temper: Studies in Sophoclean Tragedy. Sather Classical Lectures, vol. 35. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
König, J. (2005) Athletics and Literature in the Roman Empire. Cambridge.Google Scholar
König, J. (2007) “Fragmentation and coherence in Plutarch’s Sympotic Questions”, in König, J. and Whitmarsh, T. (eds.), Ordering Knowledge in the Roman World. Cambridge, 43–68.Google Scholar
König, J. (2010) “Conversational and citational brevity in Plutarch’s Sympotic Questions,” in Horster and Reitz (2010), 321–348.Google Scholar
König, J. (2012) Saints and Symposiasts: The Literature of Food and the Symposium in Graeco-Roman and Early Christian Culture. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Konrad, C. (1994) Plutarch’s Sertorius: A Historical Commentary. Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. (1994) Sexual Symmetry: Love in the Ancient Novel and Related Genres. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. (2004) “The birth of the reader: Plutarch as a literary critic”, Scholia 13: 3–27.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. (2005) “The pleasures of the ancient text or the pleasure of poetry from Plato to Plutarch”, in Cairns, F. (ed.), Greek and Roman Poetry: Greek and Roman Historiography. Cambridge, 1–17.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. (2006) “The active reader in classical antiquity”, Argos 30: 7–18.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. and S. Saïd, (2010–11) “A pig convicts itself of unreason: the implicit argument of Plutarch’s Gryllus”, Hyperboreus 16/17: 371–385.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. and S. Saïd, (eds.) (2006) Greeks on Greekness: Viewing the Greek past under the Roman Empire. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Konstantinovic, I. (1989) Montaigne et Plutarque. Geneva.Google Scholar
Korhonen, T. (2012) “On human–animal sexual relationships in Aelian’s De natura animalium”, Arctos 46: 65–77.Google Scholar
Korhonen, T. and Ruonakoski, E. (2017) Human and Animal in Ancient Greece: Empathy and Encounter in Classical Literature. London.Google Scholar
Kowalski, G. (1918) De Plutarchi scriptorum iuvenilium colore rhetorico. Krakow.Google Scholar
Krappe, A. (1933) “Solomon and Ashmodai”, AJPh: 260–268.Google Scholar
Kraus, C. (ed.) (1999) The Limits of Historiography: Genre and Narrative in Ancient Historical Texts. Leiden.Google Scholar
Krauss, F. (1912) Die rhetorischen Schriften Plutarchs. Nuremberg.Google Scholar
Labarrière, J.-L. (1997) “Logos endiathetos et logos prophorikos dans la polémique entre le Portique et la Nouvelle Académie”, in Cassin, and Labarrière, (1997), 259–280.Google Scholar
Lachenaud, G. (ed.) (1993) Plutarque: Oeuvres Morales. Vol. XII. Paris.Google Scholar
La Font de Saint-Yenne, É. (1754) Sentimens sur quelques ouvrages de peinture, sculpture et gravure. Paris.Google Scholar
La Matina, M. (1998) “Plutarco negli autori cristiani greci”, in Gallo (1998a), 81–110.Google Scholar
Laird, A. (ed.) (2006) Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Ancient Literary Criticism. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lakmann, M.-L. (1995) Der Platoniker Tauros in der Darstellung des Aulus Gellius. Leiden.Google Scholar
Laks, A. (2016) “The continuation of philosophy by other means?” in Weisser and Thaler (2016), 16–30.Google Scholar
Lamberton, R. (2001) Plutarch. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Larmour, D. (1992) “Making parallels: ‘synkrisis’ and Plutarch’s Themistocles and Camillus”, ANRW II.33.6: 4154–4200.Google Scholar
Larmour, D. (2014) “The synkrisis”, in Beck (2014a), 405–416.Google Scholar
Larmour, D. and Spencer, D. (eds.) (2007) The Sites of Rome: Time Space, Memory. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lather, A. (2017) “Taking pleasure seriously: Plutarch on the benefits of poetry and philosophy”, CW 110.3: 323–349.Google Scholar
Laurenti, R. and Indelli, G. (eds.) (1988) Plutarco: Sul controllo dell’ira (CPM 2). Naples.Google Scholar
Lauritzen, F. (2005) The Depiction of Character in the Chronographia of Michael Psellos. Diss., Columbia University.Google Scholar
Lavoine, S. (1986) “L’influence du Plutarque d’Amyot sur la tragédie française du XVIe siècle”, in Balard (1986), 273–283.Google Scholar
Law, R. A. (1943) “The Roman background of Titus Andronicus”, Studies in Philology 40: 145–153.Google Scholar
Lee, H. (2009) Biography: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford.Google Scholar
Leeck, C. (2010) Das Bild Roms in Plutarchs Römerbiographien. Schmeichelei oder ernsthafte Völkerverständigung? Marburg.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2014) “Aesop and animal fable”, in Campbell (2014), 1–23.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, M. (1981) The Lives of the Greek Poets. London.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, M. (2012) The Lives of the Greek Poets (2nd ed.). London.Google Scholar
Legros, A. (2008) “Plutarque, Amyot, Montaigne et la ‘superstition’”, in Guerrier (2008), 275–291.Google Scholar
Lemerle, P. (1986) Byzantine Humanism: The First Phase. Trans. H. Lindsay and A. Moffatt. Canberra (French original 1971).Google Scholar
Lenfant, D. (2003) “De l’usage des comiques comme source historique: les Vies de Plutarque et la Comédie Ancienne”, in Lachenaud, G. and Longrée, D. (eds.), Grecs et Romains aux prises avec l’histoire: Représentations, récits et idéologies, vol. 2. Rennes, 391–314.Google Scholar
Lenfant, D. (2007) “On Persian tryphē in Athenaeus”, in Tuplin, C. (ed.), Persian Responses: Political and Cultural Interaction with(in) the Achaemenid Empire. Swansea, 51–65.Google Scholar
Leo, F. (1901) Die griechische-römische Biographie nach ihrer litterarischen Form. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Leone, P. (ed.) (1991) Maximi Monachi Planudis Epistulae. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Lerouge, C. (2007) L’Image des Parthes dans le monde gréco-romain. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Lévy, E. (1984) “Naissance du concept de barbare”, Ktema 9: 5–14.Google Scholar
Lewis, R. (1991) “Suetonius’ ‘Caesares’ and their literary antecedents”, ANRW II. 33.5: 3623–3674.Google Scholar
Lhermitte, J.-F. (2015) L’animal vertueux dans la philosophie antique à l’époque imperiale. Paris.Google Scholar
Li Causi, P. (2009–10) “Strange animals: extremely interspecific hybridization (and anthropopoiesis) in Plutarch”, Ploutarchos 7: 47–60.Google Scholar
Li Causi, P. (2010) “Granchi, uomini e altri animali. La genesi della violenza nel De sollertia animalium di Plutarco”, in Andò, V. and Cusumano, N. (eds.), Come bestie? Forme a paradossi della violenza tra mondo antico e disagio contemporaneo. Caltanissetta, 189–208.Google Scholar
Licona, M. (2017) Why Are There Differences in the Gospels? What We Can Learn from Ancient Biography. Oxford.Google Scholar
Liebert, H. (2016) Plutarch’s Politics: Between City and Empire. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Littlewood, A. (ed.) (1985) Michael Psellus: Oratoria Minora. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Ljubarskij, J. (1993) “New trends in the study of Byzantine historiography”, Dumbarton Oaks Papers 47: 131–138.Google Scholar
Ljubarskij, J. (2000) “Why is the Alexeid a masterpiece of Byzantine literature?” in Gouma-Peterson (2000), 169–185.Google Scholar
Ljubarskij, J. et al. (1998) “Quellenforschung and/or literary criticism: narrative structures in Byzantine historical writings,” SO 73: 5–73.Google Scholar
George, Lloyd, R. (2016) A Modern Plutarch: Comparisons of the Most Influential Modern Statesmen. New York.Google Scholar
Lo Cascio, E. (2007) “Le città dell’impero e le loro élites nella testimonianza di Plutarco”, in Volpe Cacciatore and Ferrari (2007), 171–186.Google Scholar
Lomas, K. and Cornell, T. (eds.) (2003) “Bread and Circuses”: Euergetism and Municipal Patronage in Roman Italy. London.Google Scholar
Long, A. (1988) “Socrates in Hellenistic philosophy”, CQ 38: 150–117.Google Scholar
Long, A. (1996) Stoic Studies. Cambridge.Google Scholar
López Férez, J. (2008) “Personajes históricos griegos o romanos en el Quijote”, Anales cervantinos 40: 119–132.Google Scholar
López Rueda, J. (1973) Helenistas españoles del siglo XVI. Madrid.Google Scholar
Lorenz, G. (2013) Tiere im Leben der alten Kulturen: Schriftlose Kulturen, Alter Orient, Ägypten, Griechenland und Rom, 2nd ed. Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Luce, T. (1989) “Ancient views on the causes of bias in historical writing”, CPh 84: 16–31.Google Scholar
Luppino Manes, E. (1989) “La traccia della biografia plutarchea di Agesilao: individuazione di una possibile indagine critica”, in Miscellanea greca e romana XIV. Rome, 87–122. Reprinted as “Introduzione” in E. Luppino Manes and A. Marcone (eds.), Plutarco: Vite Parallele. Agesilao – Pompeo. Milan, 87–126.Google Scholar
Luttrell, A. (1960) “Greek histories translated and compiled for Juan Fernandez de Heredia, Master of Rhodes 1377–96”, Speculum 35: 401–407.Google Scholar
Luttrell, A. (1970) “Coluccio Salutati’s letter to Juan Fernández de Heredia”, IMU 13: 235–243.Google Scholar
Mably, G. (1988) De la manière d’écrire l’histoire, ed. de Negroni, B.. Paris.Google Scholar
MacCallum, M. (1910) Shakespeare’s Roman Plays and Their Background. London. Reprinted 1967.Google Scholar
Mack, P. (2016) “Montaigne on reading”, in Desan, P. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Montaigne. Oxford, 415–433.Google Scholar
MacMullen, R. (1997) Christianity and Paganism in the Fourth to Eighth Centuries. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Macrides, R. (1996) “The historian in the history”, in Constantinides, C., Panagiotakes, N., and Angelou, A. (eds.), ΦΙΛΗΕΛΛΗΝ: Studies in Honour of Robert Browning. Venice, 205–224.Google Scholar
Maisano, R. and A. Rollo (eds.) (2002) Manuele Crisolora e il ritorno del greco in occidente. Atti del Convegno Internazionale (Naples, 26–29 giugno 1997). Naples.Google Scholar
Malkin, I. (ed.) (2001) Ancient Perceptions of Greek Ethnicity. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Manfredini, M. (1975) “Gli scolii a Plutarco de Areta di Cesarea”, Siculorum Gymnasium 28: 337–350.Google Scholar
Manfredini, M. (1979) “Gli scolî alle Vite di Plutarco”, Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Byzantinistik 28: 83–119.Google Scholar
Manfredini, M. (1983) “Gli scolî alle Vite di Plutarco e i lessici Bizantini coevi”, in Leone, L. and Pietro Luigi, M. (eds.), Studi Bizantini e Neogreci: Atti del IV Congresso nazionale di studi bizantini, Lecce, 21–23 aprile 1980-Calimera, 24 aprile 1980. Galantina: 445–455.Google Scholar
Manfredini, M. (1987) “Codici plutarchei di umanisti italiani”, ASNP 17: 1001–1043.Google Scholar
Manfredini, M. (1988a) “Codici plutarchei contenenti Vitae e Moralia”, in Gallo (1988), 103–122.Google Scholar
Manfredini, M. (1988b) “Sulla tradizione manoscritta dei Moralia 70–77”, in Gallo (1988), 123–138.Google Scholar
Manfredini, M. (1992) “Due codici de Escerpta Plutarchei e l’epitome di Zonara”, Prometheus 18: 193–215.Google Scholar
Manfredini, M. (1993) “Due codici de Escerpta Plutarchei e l’epitome di Zonara II”, Prometheus 19: 1–25.Google Scholar
Manfredini, M. and Orsi, D. P. (eds.) (1987) Plutarco. Le Vite di Arato et di Artaserse. Milan.Google Scholar
Mango, C. (1975) “The availability of books in the Byzantine Empire, A.D. 750–850”, in Byzantine Books and Bookmen. A Dumbarton Oaks Colloquium. Washington, DC, 29–45.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1992) Heresiography in Context: Hippolytus’ Elenchos as a Source for Greek Philosophy. Leiden.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1994) Prolegomena: Questions to be Settled Before the Study of an Author, or a Text. Leiden.Google Scholar
Manton, G. (1949) “The manuscript tradition of Plutarch Moralia 70–7”, CQ 43: 97–104.Google Scholar
Manzini, F. (2019) “Plutarch from Voltaire to Stendhal”, in Xenophontos and Oikonomopoulou (2019), 515–527.Google Scholar
Mariev, S. (ed.) (2008) Ioannis Antiocheni Fragmenta quae supersunt omnia. Berlin.Google Scholar
Marincola, J. (1994) “Plutarch’s refutation of Herodotus”, AncW 25: 191–203.Google Scholar
Marincola, J. (1999) “Genre, convention, and innovation in Greco-Roman historiography”, in Kraus (1999), 281–324.Google Scholar
Marincola, J. (2010) “Plutarch, ‘Parallelism’ and the Persian-War Lives”, in Humble (2010b), 217–235.Google Scholar
Marincola, J. (2011) “Romans and/as Barbarians”, in Bonfante, L. (ed.), The Barbarians of Ancient Europe. Cambridge, 347–357.Google Scholar
Marincola, J. (2012) “The fairest victor: Plutarch, Aristides and the Persian Wars”, Histos 6: 91–113.Google Scholar
Marincola, J. (2015a) “Plutarch, Herodotus and the historian’s character”, in Ash, , Mossman, , and Titchener, (2015), 83–95.Google Scholar
Marincola, J. (2015b) “Defending the divine: Plutarch on the gods in Herodotus”, in A. Ellis (ed.), God in History: Reading and Rewriting Herodotean Theology from Plutarch to the Renaissance. Histos supplement 4: 41–83. https://histos.org/documents/SV04EllisGodinHistory.pdf.Google Scholar
Marincola, J. (2018) “The strategies of Plutarch’s On the Malice of Herodotus”, in Thorsen, T. and Harrison, S. (eds.), Dynamics of Ancient Prose: Biographic, Novelistic, Apologetic. Berlin, 19–35.Google Scholar
Markantonatos, A. and Tsangalis, C. (eds.) (2008) Αρχαία ελληνική τραγωδία: θεωρία και πράξη. Athens.Google Scholar
Markopoulos, A. (2003) “Byzantine history writing at the end of the first millennium”, in Magdalino, P. (ed.), Byzantium in the Year 1000. Leiden, 183–197.Google Scholar
Markopoulos, A. (2009) “From narrative historiography to historical biography: new trends in Byzantine historical writing in the 10th–11th centuries”, Byzantinische Zeitschrift 102: 697–715.Google Scholar
Marshall, L. (2017) “Gadfly or spur? The meaning of μύωψ in Plato’s Apology of Socrates”, JHS 137: 163–174.Google Scholar
Martin, H., Jr. (1960) “The concept of prāotēs in Plutarch’s Lives”, GRBS 3: 65–73.Google Scholar
Martin, H. (1961) “The concept of philanthropia in Plutarch’s Lives”, AJPh 82: 164–175.Google Scholar
Martin, H. (1979) “Plutarch’s De sollertia animalium 959 B–C: the discussion of the encomium of hunting”, AJPh 100: 99–106.Google Scholar
Martin, H. (1995) “Moral failure without vice in Plutarch’s Athenian Lives”, Ploutarchos 12.1: 13–18.Google Scholar
Martin, R. (1993) “The Seven Sages as performers of wisdom”, in Dougherty, C. and Kurke, L. (eds.), Cultural Poetics in Archaic Greece: Cult, Performance, Politics. Cambridge, 108–128.Google Scholar
Martindale, C. (ed.) (2004) Shakespeare and the Classics. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Martindale, C. and Martindale, M. (1990) Shakespeare and the Uses of Antiquity. London.Google Scholar
Martinelli Tempesta, S. (2013) “La tradizione manoscritta dei Moralia di Plutarco. Riflessioni per una messa a punto”, in Pace and Volpe Cacciatore (2013), 273–288.Google Scholar
Martínez Benavides, M. (1999) “Plutarco en un comentario a Platón del siglo XVI”, in Montes Cala et al. (1999), 301–308.Google Scholar
Martínez Fernández, A. (1994) “El vocabulario de los epigramas cretenses de época imperial”, in Actas del VIII congreso español de estudios clásicos: (Madrid, 23–28 de septiembre de 1991. Madrid, 185–192.Google Scholar
Masaracchia, A. (1995) “Tracce aristoteliche nell’ An seni res publica gerenda sit e nei Praecepta gerendae rei publicae”, in Gallo and Scardigli (1995), 227–234.Google Scholar
Mason, H. (1970) “The Roman government in Greek sources”, Phoenix 24: 150–159.Google Scholar
Massaro, D. (1995) “I Praecepta gerendae rei publicae e il realismo politico di Plutarco”, in Gallo and Scardigli (1995), 235–244.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, F. (1931) “Sir Thomas North”, in Translation: An Elizabethan Art. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
May, G. (1967) “Corneille and the classics”, Yale French Studies 38: 138–150.Google Scholar
May, T. (1639) The Tragedy of Cleopatra, Queen of Egypt. London.Google Scholar
Mayer, K. (1997) “Themistocles, Plutarch, and the voice of the Other”, in Schrader, Ramón, and Vela (1997), 297–304.Google Scholar
Mazza, M. (1995) “Plutarco e la politica romana. Alcune riconsiderazioni”, in Gallo and Scardigli (1995), 245–268.Google Scholar
McCarthy, B. (1940–1) “Literary reminiscences in Psellus’s Chronographia”, Byzantion 15: 296–299.Google Scholar
McGing, B. and Mossman, J. (eds.) (2006a) The Limits of Ancient Biography. Swansea.Google Scholar
McGing, B. and Mossman, J. (2006b) “Introduction”, in McGing and Mossman (2006a), ix–xx.Google Scholar
McGrail, M. (ed.) (1997) Shakespeare’s Plutarch. Tokyo.Google Scholar
McInerney, J. (2003) “Plutarch’s manly women”, in Rosen, R. and Sluiter, I. (eds.), Andreia: Studies in Manliness and Courage in Classical Antiquity. Leiden, 319–344.Google Scholar
McNamara, J. (1999) “Gendering virtue”, in Pomeroy (1999a), 151–161.Google Scholar
Meeusen, M. (2016) Plutarch’s Science of Natural Problems: A Study with Commentary on Quaestiones Naturales. Leuven.Google Scholar
Meeusen, M. (2017) “Egyptian knowledge at Plutarch’s table: Out of the question?” in Georgiadou and Oikonomopoulou (2017), 215–226.Google Scholar
Mendels, D. (1986) “Greek and Roman history in the Bibliotheca of Photius – a note”, Byzantion 56: 196–206.Google Scholar
Menéndez, Pelayo, M. (1905) Cervantes y El Quijote. Whitefish, MT.Google Scholar
Méniel, B. (2008) “La réception en France, au XVIe siècle, du traité Comment il faut réfréner la colère”, in Guerrier (2008), 109–130.Google Scholar
Mérot, A. (1987) Eustache Le Sueur 1616–1655. Paris.Google Scholar
Mestre, F. (1999) “Plutarco contra el sofista”, in Pérez Jiménez, García López, and Aguilar (1999), 383–395.Google Scholar
Mestre, F. (2003) “Anacharsis, the wise man from abroad”, Lexis 21: 303–317.Google Scholar
Michelini, A. (ed.) (2003) Plato as Author: The Rhetoric of Philosophy. Leiden.Google Scholar
Migne, J.-P. (ed.) (1928–45) Patrologia Graeca. Paris.Google Scholar
Miles, Gary (1989) “How Roman are Shakespeare’s ‘Romans’?” Shakespeare Quarterly 40: 257–283.Google Scholar
Miles, Geoffrey (1996) Shakespeare and the Constant Romans. Oxford.Google Scholar
Miletti, M. (2014) “Il De laude ipsius di Plutarco a la teoria “classica” dell’autoelogio”, in Volpe Cacciatore, P. (ed.), Plutarco: linguaggi e retorica. Atti del XII Convegno della International Plutarch Society, Seziona Italiana. Naples, 79–99.Google Scholar
Millar, F. (1964) A Study of Cassius Dio. Oxford.Google Scholar
Minon, S. (2015) “Plutarque (Thém. 24) transpose Thucydide (i.136): de l’harmonie austère au péan delphique. Pragmatique et rythmique de deux mode de composition stylistique”, REG 28: 29–99.Google Scholar
Mittelhaus, K. (1911) De Plutarchi Praeceptis gerendae reipublicae. Diss., Leipzig University.Google Scholar
Moles, J. (ed.) (1988) Plutarch: Life of Cicero. Warminster, PA.Google Scholar
Moles, J. (1989) Review of Geiger (1985), CR 39: 229–233.Google Scholar
Moles, J. (1996) “Diatribe”, in S. Hornblower and A. Spawforth (eds.), Oxford Classical Dictionary, 3rd ed. Oxford, 463–464.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. (1949) “Notes on Petrarch, John of Salisbury and the Institutio Trajani”, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 12: 189–190.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. (1993) The Development of Greek Biography, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Monaco, M. (2011–12) “Folly and dark humor in the Life of Demetrius”, Ploutarchos 9: 49–59.Google Scholar
Monaghan, L. and Goodman, J. (eds.) (2007) A Cultural Approach to Interpersonal Communication: Essential Readings. Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Montaigne, M. (1987) Michel de Montaigne: The Complete Essays, ed. Screech, M.. London.Google Scholar
Montchrestien, A. de (1943) Les Lacènes: A Critical Edition, ed. Calkins, G.. Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Montes Cala, J., Sánchez, M. Ortiz, de Landaluce, and Gallé Cejudo, R. (eds.) (1999) Plutarco, Dioniso y el vino. Madrid.Google Scholar
Montiglio, S. (2011) From Villain to Hero: Odysseus in Ancient Thought. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Mora, F. (2007a) “Greci e romani nelle Vite parallele”, Polifemo 7: 135–92.Google Scholar
Mora, F. (2007b) “Nuclei d’interesse e strategie interpretative nelle Quaestiones Romanae di Plutarco”, Gerión 25: 329–370.Google Scholar
Morales Ortiz, A. (2000) Plutarco en España: Traducciones de Moralia en el siglo XVI. Murcia.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, G. (ed.) and R. Jenkins (trans.) (1967) Constantine Porphyogenitus: De administrando imperio. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Morgan, T. (2011) “The miscellany and Plutarch”, in Klotz and Oikonomopoulou (2011a), 49–73.Google Scholar
Morrison, M. (1974) “Some aspects of the treatment of the theme of Antony and Cleopatra in tragedies of the sixteenth century”, Journal of European Studies 4: 113–125.Google Scholar
Mossman, J. (1988) “Tragedy and epic in Plutarch’s Alexander”, JHS 108: 83–93. Reprinted in Scardigli (1995), 209–228.Google Scholar
Mossman, J. (1992) “Plutarch, Pyrrhus, and Alexander”, in Stadter (1992b), 90–108.Google Scholar
Mossman, J. (ed.) (1997a) Plutarch and His Intellectual World: Essays on Plutarch. London.Google Scholar
Mossman, J. (1997b) “Plutarch and Shakespeare’s HIV parts 1 and 2”, in McGrail (1997), 99–118.Google Scholar
Mossman, J. (1997c) “Plutarch’s Dinner of the Seven Wise Men and its place in symposion literature”, in Mossman (1997a), 119–140.Google Scholar
Mossman, J. (2005a) “Plutarch on animals: rhetorical strategies in de sollertia animalium”, Hermathena 179: 141–163.Google Scholar
Mossman, J. (2005b) “Taxis ou barbaros: Greek and Roman in Plutarch’s Pyrrhus”, CQ 55: 498–517.Google Scholar
Mossman, J. (2010) “A life unparalleled: Plutarch’s Artaxerxes”, in Humble (2010b), 145–168.Google Scholar
Mossman, J. (2014) “Tragedy and the hero”, in Beck (2014a), 437–448.Google Scholar
Mossman, J. (forthcoming) “Tragicomedy? Generic enrichment in Plutarch, Demetrius 38 and Antony 70”, in Duff and Chrysanthou (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Mossman, J. and Titchener, F. B. (2011) “Bitch is not a four-letter word: animal reason and human passion in Plutarch”, in Roskam and Van der Stockt (2011), 273–296.Google Scholar
Moxon, I., J. Smart, and A. J. Woodman (eds.) (1986), Past Perspectives: Studies in Greek and Roman Historical Writing. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Muccioli, F. (2000) “La critica di Plutarco a Filisto e a Timeo”, in Van der Stockt (2000b), 291–307.Google Scholar
Muccioli, F. (2012) La storia attraverso gli esempi: Protagonisti e interpretazioni del mondo greco in Plutarco. Milan.Google Scholar
Mueller-Goldingen, C. (1993) “Politische Theorie und Praxis bei Plutarch”, Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumswissenschaft 19: 201–213.Google Scholar
Müller, R. (1978) “Hellenen und Barbaren im Spiegel der hellenistischen Philosophie”, Klio 60: 183–189.Google Scholar
Mullett, M. (2002) “New literary history and the history of Byzantine literature: a worthwhile endeavour?” in Odorico, P. and Agapitos, P. (eds.), Pour une “nouvelle” histoire de la littérature Byzantine. Paris, 37–60.Google Scholar
Murray, O. (1983) “The symposion as social organisation,” in Hägg, R. (ed.), The Greek Renaissance of the Eighth Century B.C: Tradition and Innovation. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium at the Swedish Institute in Athens, 1–5 June, 1981. Stockholm, 195–200.Google Scholar
Murray, O. (ed.)(1990) Sympotica. A Symposium on the Symposion. Oxford.Google Scholar
Murray, O. and Tecuşan, M. (eds.) (1995) In Vino Veritas. Rome.Google Scholar
Naas, M. (2015) “American gadfly: Plato and the problem of metaphor”, in Bell, J. and Naas, M. (eds.), Plato’s Animals: Gadflies, Horses, Swans, and Other Philosophical Beasts. Bloomington, IN: 43–59.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (1979) The Best of the Achaeans. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Narro Sánchez, A. (2011) “Los valores de la buena mujer en Plutarco a través del De Institutione feminae christianae de Luis Vives”, in Candau Morón et al. (2011), 569–584.Google Scholar
Neill, M. (ed.) (1994) The Oxford Shakespeare: The Tragedy of Anthony and Cleopatra. Oxford.Google Scholar
Németh, A. (2010) Imperial Systematization of the Past: Emperor Constantine VII and His Historical Excerpts. Ph.D. diss., Central European University, Budapest (www.etd.ceu.he/2010/mphnea01.pdf).Google Scholar
Németh, A. (2019) “The reception of Plutarch in Constantinople in the ninth and tenth centuries”, in Xenophontos and Oikonomopoulou (2019), 187–204.Google Scholar
Nerdahl, M. (2007) Homeric Models in Plutarch’s Lives. Diss., University of Wisconsin–Madison.Google Scholar
Nerdahl, M. (2011–12) “Exiling Achilles: reflections on the banished statesman in Plutarch’s Lives”, CJ 107: 331–353.Google Scholar
Nesselrath, H.-G. (ed.) (2010) Plutarch: On the Daimonion of Socrates – Human Liberation, Divine Guidance and Philosophy. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Neville, L. (2012) Heroes and Romans in Twelfth-Century Byzantium. The Material for History of Nikephoros Bryennios. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Neville, L. (2016) Anna Komnene: The Life and Work of a Medieval Historian. Oxford.Google Scholar
Nevin, S. (2014) “Negative comparison: Agamemnon and Alexander in Plutarch’s Agesilaus–Pompey”, GRBS 54: 45–68.Google Scholar
Newmyer, S. T. (1992) “Plutarch on justice toward animals: ancient insights on a moral debate”, Scholia 1: 38–54.Google Scholar
Newmyer, S. T. (1997) “Just beasts? Plutarch and modern science on the sense of fair play in animals”, CO 74.3: 85–88.Google Scholar
Newmyer, S. T. (1999) “Speaking of beasts: the Stoics and Plutarch on animal behaviour and the modern case against animals”, QUCC 63: 99–110.Google Scholar
Newmyer, S. T. (2003) “Paws to reflect: ancients and moderns on the religious sensibilities of animals”, QUCC 75: 111–129.Google Scholar
Newmyer, S. T. (2006) Animals, Rights and Reason in Plutarch and Modern Ethics. New York.Google Scholar
Newmyer, S. T. (2008) “Animals in ancient philosophy: conceptions and misconceptions”, in Kalof, L. (ed.), A Cultural History of Animals in Antiquity. Oxford, 151–174.Google Scholar
Newmyer, S. T. (2014a) “Animals in Plutarch”, in Beck (2014a), 223–234.Google Scholar
Newmyer, S. T. (2014b) “Being the one and becoming the other: animals in ancient philosophical schools”, in Campbell (2014), 507–534.Google Scholar
Newmyer, S. T. (2017a) The Animal and the Human in Ancient and Modern Thought: The “Man Alone of Animals” Concept. London.Google Scholar
Newmyer, S. T. (2017b) “Human–animal interactions in Plutarch as commentary on human moral failings”, in Fögen and Thomas (2017), 233–252.Google Scholar
Nieto Ibáñez, J. M. (2005) “Plutarco y la polémica antiestoica en las Academica de Pedro de Valencia”, in Jufresa et al. (2005), 789–796.Google Scholar
Nieto Ibáñez, J. M. (2007), “Plutarco en la Monarquía Mística de Lorenzo de Zamora: el amor a las humanas y divinas letras”, in Nieto Ibáñez and López López (2007), 639–672.Google Scholar
Nieto Ibáñez, J. M. and López López, R. (eds.) (2007) El amor en Plutarco. León.Google Scholar
Nikolaidis, A. (1986) “ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΟΣ – ΒΑΡΒΑΡΙΚΟΣ: Plutarch on Greek and Barbarian characteristics”, WS 99: 229–244.Google Scholar
Nikolaidis, A. (1988) “Is Plutarch fair to Nikias?” ICS 13: 319–333.Google Scholar
Nikolaidis, A. (1991) “Plutarch’s contradictions”, C&M 42: 153–186.Google Scholar
Nikolaidis, A. (1994) “Plutarch’s contradictions”, AncW 25.2: 213–222.Google Scholar
Nikolaidis, A. (1997) “Plutarch on women and marriage”, WS 110: 27–88.Google Scholar
Nikolaidis, A. (1999) “Plutarch’s attitude to wine”, in Montes Cala et al. (1999), 337–348.Google Scholar
Nikolaidis, A. (ed.) (2008) The Unity of Plutarch’s Work: Moralia Themes in the Lives, Features of the Lives in the Moralia. Berlin.Google Scholar
Nikolaidis, A. (2009) “Philanthropia as sociability and Plutarch’s unsociable heroes”, in Ribeiro Ferreira et al. (2009), 275–288.Google Scholar
Nikolaidis, A. (2011) “Plutarch’s ‘minor ethics:’ some remarks on De garrulitate, De curiositate and De vitioso pudore”, in Roskam and Van der Stockt (2011), 205–221.Google Scholar
Nikolaidis, A. (2012) “Aspects of Plutarch’s notion of philotimia”, in Roskam, De Pourq and Van der Stockt (2012), 31–53.Google Scholar
Nikolaidis, A. (2014) “Morality, characterization, and individuality”, in Beck (2014a), 350–372.Google Scholar
Nikolaidis, A. (2017) “Past and present in Plutarch’s Table Talk”, in Georgiadou and Oikonomopoulou (2017), 257–270.Google Scholar
Nippel, W. (2002) “The construction of the ‘Other’”, in Harrison (2002), 278–310.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. (1990) “Cola and clausulae in Cicero’s speeches”, in Craik, E. (ed.), Owls to Athens: Essays on Classical Subjects Presented to Sir Kenneth Dover. Oxford, 349–359.Google Scholar
Noël, M.-P. (2002) “Vin, ivresse et démocratie chez Platon”, in Jouanna, Villard, and Béguin (2002), 204–219.Google Scholar
Nora, P. (1984) Les lieux de mémoire. Paris (Trans. A. Goldhammer as Realms of Memory: Rethinking the French Past. New York, 1996).Google Scholar
North, J. and Mack, P. (eds.) (2018) The Afterlife of Plutarch. London.Google Scholar
North, T. (1579) The Lives of the Nobles Grecians and Romanes compared together by that grave learned Philosopher and Historiographer Plutarke of Chaeronea […]. London.Google Scholar
North, T. (1595) The Lives of the Nobles Grecians and Romanes compared together by that grave learned Philosopher and Historiographer Plutarke of Chaeronea […], 2nd ed. London.Google Scholar
North, T. (1603) The Lives of the Nobles Grecians and Romanes compared together by that grave learned Philosopher and Historiographer Plutarke of Chaeronea […] 3rd ed. London.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1994) The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2002) “The incomplete feminism of Musonius Rufus, Platonist, Stoic, and Roman”, in Nussbaum, M. and Sihvola, J. (eds.), The Sleep of Reason: Erotic Experience and Sexual Ethics in Ancient Greece and Rome. Chicago, IL, 283–326.Google Scholar
Nyquist, M. (2022) “Tyrannicide, law, and sacrifice in Julius Caesar”, ELH 89: 893–926.Google Scholar
Oakesmith, J. (1902) The Religion of Plutarch: A Pagan Creed of Apostolic Times – An Essay. London.Google Scholar
Odorico, P. 2009. “Byzantium, a literature that needs to be reconsidered”, in Stănculescu, I. (ed.), Manuscrise bizantine în colecții bucureştene = Byzantine Manuscripts in Bucharest’s Collections. Bucharest, 64–77.Google Scholar
Oikonomopoulou, K. (2011) “Peripatetic knowledge in the Table Talk”, in Klotz and Oikonomopoulou (2011a), 105–130.Google Scholar
Oikonomopoulou, K. (2013a) “Plutarch’s corpus of Quaestiones in the tradition of imperial Greek encyclopaedism”, in König, J. and Woolf, G. (eds.), Encyclopaedism from Antiquity to the Renaissance. Cambridge, 129–153.Google Scholar
Oikonomopoulou, K. (2013b) “Ethnography and authorial voice in Athenaeus’ Deipnosophistae”, in Almagor, and Skinner, (2013), 179–199.Google Scholar
Oikonomopoulou, K. (2017a) “Space, Delphi and the construction of the Greek past in Plutarch’s Greek Questions”, in Georgiadou and Oikonomopoulou (2017), 107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oikonomopoulou, K. (2017b) “Miscellanies,” in Richter, and Johnson, (2017), 447–462.Google Scholar
O’Neill, E. (1997) “Plutarch on friendship”, in Fitzgerald, J. (ed.), Greco-Roman Perspectives on Friendship. Atlanta, GA, 105–122.Google Scholar
Opelt, I. and Speyer, W. (1967) “Barbar”, JbAC 10: 251–290.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. (1994) “L’âme du monde et l’âme de l’homme chez Plutarque”, in Valdés, García (1994),33–49.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. (1996) “Divination and academic ‘skepticism’ according to Plutarch”, in Van der Stockt (1996), 165–194.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. (1998) In Search of the Truth: Academic Tendencies in Middle Platonism. Brussels.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. (2001) “Neoplatonist criticisms of Plutarch”, in Pérez Jiménez and Casadesús Bordoy (2001), 187–199.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. (2004) “Plutarch’s De animae procreatione in Timaeo: manipulation or search for consistency?” in Adamson, P., Baltussen, H. and Stone, M. (eds.), Philosophy, Science and Exegesis in Greek, Arabic and Latin Commentaries. London, 137–162.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. (2005) “Plutarch’s Platonism revisited”, in Bonazzi, M. and Celluprica, V. (eds.), L’eredità Platonica: studi sul Platonismo da Arcesilao a Proclo. Naples, 163–200.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. (2006) “Eros in Plutarchs moralischer Psychologie”, in Görgemanns (2006), 208–235.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. (2007a) “Eros and knowledge in Plutarch’s Amatorius”, in Nieto Ibáñez and López López (2007), 149–168.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. (2007b) “The place of Plutarch in the history of Platonism”, in Volpe Cacciatore and Ferrari (2007), 281–309.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. (2007c) “Plutarch on the One and the dyad”, in Sorabji, R. and Sharples, R. (eds.), Greek and Roman Philosophy 100 BC to 200 AD. London, 379–395.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. (2009) “M. Annius Ammonius: a philosophical profile”, in Bonazzi, and Opsomer, (2009), 123–186.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. (2012) “Plutarch on the division of the soul”, in Barney, R., Brennan, T., and Brittain, C. (eds.), Plato and the Divided Self. Cambridge, 311–330.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. (2014) “Plutarch and the Stoics”, in Beck (2014a), 88–103.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. (2016) “Plutarch’s unphilosophical Lives: philosophical, after all?” in M. Bonazzi and S. Schorn (eds.), Bios philosophos: Philosophy in Ancient Greek Biography. Turnhout, 101–126.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. (2017) “Is Plutarch really hostile to the Stoics?” in Engberg-Pedersen, T. (ed.), From Stoicism to Platonism: The Development of Philosophy 100 BCE–100 CE. Cambridge, 296–321.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. (2020) “The Platonic soul, from the Early Academy to the first century CE”, in Inwood, B. and Warren, J. (eds.), Body and Soul in Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge, 171–198.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. and Steel, C. (eds.) (2012) Proclus: Ten Problems Concerning Providence (Ancient Commentators on Aristotle). London.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J., Roskam, G., and Titchener (eds.), F. B. (2016) A Versatile Gentleman: Consistency in Plutarch’s Writing. Leuven.Google Scholar
Ortega Castejón, J. (1991) “Plutarco y el Comentario de Juan Luis de la Cerda a las Georgicas de Virgilio”, in García López and Calderón Dorda (1991), 183–189.Google Scholar
Osborne, C. (2007) Dumb Beasts and Dead Philosophers: Humanity and the Humane in Ancient Philosophy and Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar
Oudot, E. (2010) “‘Marathon, l’Eurymédon, Platées, laissons-les aux écoles des sophistes!’ Les guerres médiques au second siècle de notre ère”, in Malosse, P.-L., Noël, M.-P., and Schouler, B. (eds.), Clio sous le regard d’Hermès: L’utilisation de l’histoire dans la rhétorique ancienne de l’époque hellénistique à l’antiquité tardive. Alessandria, 143–157.Google Scholar
Pacca, V. (ed.) (1996) Petrarch: Trionfi, Rime, Codice degli abbozzi. Milan.Google Scholar
Pace, B. and Volpe Cacciatore, P. (eds.) (2013) Gli scritti di Plutarco: Tradizione, traduzione, ricezione, commento. Naples.Google Scholar
Padberg, F. (1933) Cicero und Cato Censorius. Bottrop.Google Scholar
Pade, M. (1995) “The Latin translations of Plutarch’s Lives in fifteenth-century Italy and their manuscript diffusion”, in Leonardi, C. and Munk Olsen, B. (eds.), The Classical Tradition in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance: Proceedings of the first European Science Foundation Workshop on “The Reception of Classical Texts.” Spoleto, 169–183.Google Scholar
Pade, M. (1999) “Plutarch, Gellius and John of Salisbury in Humanist Anthologies”, in Rodén, M.-L. (ed.), Ab Aquilone: Nordic Studies in Honour and Memory of Leonard E. Boyle, O.P., Skrifter utgivne af Riksarkivet 14. Stockholm, 57–70.Google Scholar
Pade, M. (2007) The Reception of Plutarch’s Lives in Fifteenth-Century Italy. 2 vols. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Pade, M. (ed.) (2013) Plutarchi Chaeronensis Vita Dionis Guarino Veronense interprete. Florence.Google Scholar
Pade, M. (2014) “The reception of Plutarch from antiquity to the Italian Renaissance”, in Beck (2014a), 531–543.Google Scholar
Pade, M. (2017) “Lives transformed: John Whethamstede’s use of Plutarch’s Lives”, in Baker (2017), 93–118.Google Scholar
Palm, J. (1955) Über Sprache und Stil des Diodoros von Sizilien. Lund.Google Scholar
Panagopoulos, C. (1977) “Vocabulaire et mentalité dans les Moralia de Plutarque”, DHA 3: 197–235.Google Scholar
Papadi, D. (2005) “Theatricality and dramatic vocabulary in Plutarch’s Moralia: How to tell a flatterer from a friend”, in Jufresa et al. (2005), 401–412.Google Scholar
Papadi, D. (2008) “Moralia in the Lives: tragedy and theatrical imagery in Plutarch’s Pompey”, in Nikolaidis (2008), 112–123.Google Scholar
Papadodima, E. (2010) “The Greek/Barbarian interaction in Euripides’ Andromache, Orestes, Heracleidae: a reassessment of Greek attitudes to foreigners”, Digressus 10: 1–42.Google Scholar
Papakonstantinou, Z. (2014) “Sport, victory, commemoration and elite identities in archaic and early classical Athens”, C&M 65: 87–126.Google Scholar
Paster, G. K. (1989) “‘In the spirit of men there is no blood’: blood as trope of gender in Julius Caesar”, Shakespeare Quarterly 40.1: 284–298.Google Scholar
Patterson, C. (1992) “Plutarch’s ‘Advice on Marriage:’ traditional wisdom through a philosophic lens”, ANRW II.33.6: 4708–4723. Reprinted in Pomeroy (1999a), 128–137.Google Scholar
Paul, G. (1991) “Symposia and deipna in Plutarch’s Lives and in other historical writings”, in Slater (1991), 157–169.Google Scholar
Pavis d’Escurac, H. (1981) “Périls et chances du régime civique selon Plutarque”, Ktèma 6: 287–300.Google Scholar
Payen, P. (2001) “Byzance”, in Hartog, F. et al. (eds.), Plutarque: Vies parallès. Paris, 1972–1973.Google Scholar
Payen, P. (2014) “Plutarch the antiquarian”, in Beck (2014a), 235–248.Google Scholar
Payne, M. (2010) The Animal Part: Human and Other Animals in the Poetic Imagination. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Pelegrín Campo, J. (1997) “La noción de barbarie en las Vidas paralelas de Plutarco de Queronea”, in Schrader, Ramón, and Vela (1997), 367–378.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (1973) “Plutarch, Alexander and Caesar: two new fragments?” CQ 23: 343–344.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (1979) “Plutarch’s method of work in the Roman Lives”, JHS 99: 74–96. Reprinted in Scardigli (1995), 265-318; updated version in Pelling (2002a), 1–44.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (1980) “Plutarch’s adaptation of his source-material”, JHS 100: 127–140. Reprinted in Scardigli (1995), 125-154; updated version in Pelling (2002a), 91–115.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (1986a) “Plutarch and Roman politics”, in Moxon, , Smart, , and Woodman, (1986), 159–187. Reprinted in Scardigli (1995), 319–356 and in Pelling (2002a), 207–236.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (1986b) “Synkrisis in Plutarch’s Lives”, in Brenk, F. and Gallo, I. (eds.), Miscellanea Plutarchea. Ferrari, 83–96; updated version in Pelling (2002a), 349–363.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (ed.) (1988a) Plutarch: Life of Antony. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (1988b) “Aspects of Plutarch’s characterization”, ICS 13: 257–274. Reprinted in Pelling (2002a), 283–300.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (1989) “Plutarch: Roman heroes and Greek culture”, in Griffin, M. and Barnes, J. (eds.), Philosophia Togata: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society. Oxford, 199–232.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (1990a) “Truth and fiction in Plutarch’s Lives”, in Russell, D. (ed.), Antonine Literature. Oxford, 19–52. Reprinted in Pelling (2002a), 143–170.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (1990b) “Childhood and personality in Greek biography”, in Pelling (1990c), 213–244. Reprinted in Pelling (2002a), 301–338.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (ed.) (1990c), Characterization and Individuality in Greek Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (1992) “Plutarch and Thucydides”, in Stadter, (1992b) 10–40. Reprinted in Pelling (2002a), 117–141.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (1995) “The moralism of Plutarch’s Lives”, in Innes, Hine, and Pelling (1995), 205–220. Reprinted in Pelling (2002a), 237–251.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (1996) “Prefazione”, in F. Albini (ed.), Plutarco. Vita di Coriolano, Vita di Alcibiade. Milan, xx–lviii.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (1997a) “East is East and West is West – or are they? National stereotypes in Herodotus”, Histos 1 (www.dur.ac.uk/classics/histos/1997/pelling.html).Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (1997b) “Introduzione”, in Pelling, C. and Melandri, E. (eds.), Plutarco: Vite parallele. Filopemene – Tito Flaminino. Milan, 87–166, 249–331.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (1997c) “Is death the end? Closure in Plutarch’s Lives”, in Roberts, D., Dunn, F., and Fowler, D. (eds.), Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature. Princeton, NJ, 228–250; updated version in Pelling (2002a), 365–386.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (1997d) “Plutarch on Caesar’s fall”, in Mossman (1997a), 215–232.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (1997e) “The shaping of Coriolanus: Dionysius, Plutarch and Shakespeare”, in McGrail (1997), 3–32. Reprinted in Pelling (2002a), 387–411.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (1999a) “Dionysiac diagnostics: some hints of Dionysus in Plutarch’s Lives”, in Montes Cala et al. (1999), 359–368. Reprinted in Pelling (2002a), 197–206.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (1999b) “Epilogue”, in Kraus (1999), 325–357.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (1999c) “‘Making myth look like history:’ Plutarch’s Theseus-Romulus”, in Pérez Jiménez, García López, and Aguilar (1999), 431–443. Reprinted in Pelling (2002a), 171–195.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (2000a) Literary Texts and the Greek Historian. London.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (2000b) “Rhetoric, paideia, and psychology in Plutarch’s Lives”, in Van der Stockt (2000b), 331–339. Reprinted in Pelling (2002a), 339–347.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (2001) Review of Ehlers (1998), CR 51: 273–276.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (2002a) Plutarch and History: Eighteen Studies. Swansea.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (2002b) “The Apophthegmata Regum et Imperatorum and Plutarch’s Roman Lives”, in Pelling (2002a), 65–90.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (2002c) “‘You for me and me for you’: narrator and narratee in Plutarch’s Lives”, in Pelling (2002a), 267–282.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (2004) “Do Plutarch’s politicians never learn?” in de Blois et al. (2004), 87–103.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (2005a) “Synkrisis revisited”, in Pérez Jiménez and Titchener (2005), 325–340.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (2005b) “Plutarch’s Socrates”, Hermathena 179: 105–139.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (2006) “Breaking the bounds: writing about Julius Caesar”, in McGing and Mossman (2006a), 255–280.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (2007a) “De malignitate Plutarchi: Plutarch, Herodotus and the Persian wars”, in Bridges, E., Hall, E., and Rhodes, P. (eds.), Cultural Responses to the Persian Wars. Oxford, 145–164.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (2007b) “Ion’s Epidemiai and Plutarch’s Ion”, in Jennings and Katsaros (2007), 75–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelling, C. (2009) “Biography”, in Boys-Stones, Graziosi, and Vasunia (2009), 608–616.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (2010) “Plutarch’s ‘Tale of Two Cities’: do the Parallel Lives combine as global histories?” in Humble (2010b), 217–235.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (2011a) Plutarch: Caesar. Translated with an Introduction and Commentary.Oxford.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (2011b) “What is popular about Plutarch’s ‘popular philosophy’?” in Roskam and Van der Stockt (2011), 41–58.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (2012) “Plutarch on Roman philotimia”, in Roskam, De Pourcq, and Van der Stockt (2012), 55–67.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (2014) “Political philosophy”, in Beck (2014a), 149–162.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (2016a) “Herodotus, Polycrates – and maybe Stesimbrotus too?” JHS 136: 113–120.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (2016b) “Tragic colouring in Plutarch”, in Opsomer, , Roskam, , and Titchener, (eds.), 113–133.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (2020) “Fifth-century preliminaries”, in De Temmerman (2020), 97–110.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (in press) “A doubles match: Agis–Cleomenes and the Gracchi”, in Davies and Mossman (forthcoming in 2023).Google Scholar
Pérez Jiménez, A. (1990) “Plutarco y el humanismo español del Renacimiento”, in Pérez Jiménez and del Cerro Calderón (1990), 229–247.Google Scholar
Pérez Jiménez, A. (1996) “ΔΕΙΣΙΔΑΙΜΟΝΙΑ: el miedo a los dioses en Plutarco”, in Van der Stockt (1996), 195–226.Google Scholar
Pérez Jiménez, A. (1998) “Luisa Sigea y Plutarco”, in Gallo (1998a), 377–388.Google Scholar
Pérez Jiménez, A. (2002) “Plutarco y la literatura española del XVII: Importancia actual de los estudios sobre Plutarco”, in Ribeiro Ferreira (2002), 353–368.Google Scholar
Pérez Jiménez, A. (2003a) “Las Vidas Paralelas de Plutarco de la emblemática hispánica de los siglos XVI y XVII”, Humanitas 55: 223–240.Google Scholar
Pérez Jiménez, A. (2003b) “El Plutarco de los Moralia en la literatura emblemática española”, in Fernández Ariza, G. (ed.), Literatura Hispanoamericana del Siglo XX: Mímesis e Iconografía. Málaga, 169–195.Google Scholar
Pérez Jiménez, A. (2003c) “Los héroes de Plutarco como modelo en la literatura emblemática europea de los siglos XVI–XVII”, in Barzanò, et al. (2003), 375–402.Google Scholar
Pérez Jiménez, A. (2005) “Usos didácticos de la imagen y la palabra: El Plutarco de Juan Francisco de Villava”, in Jufresa et al. (2005), 797–808.Google Scholar
Pérez Jiménez, A. (2006) “Plutarco, Juan de Mal Lara y la Galera Real de D. Juan de Austria”, in Aguilar and Alfageme (2006), 233–246.Google Scholar
Pérez Jiménez, A. (2007) “El Plutarco de Antonio Agustín”, in Nieto Ibáñez and López López (2007), 673–686.Google Scholar
Pérez Jiménez, A. (2009) “Plutarco de Queronea”, in Lafarga, F. and Pegenaute (eds.), L., Diccionario histórico de la traducción en España. Madrid, 910–911.Google Scholar
Pérez Jiménez, A. (2014) “The reception of Plutarch in Spain”, in Beck (2014a), 556–576.Google Scholar
Pérez Jiménez, A. (2019) “Plutarch’s fortune in Spain”, in Xenophontos and Oikonomopoulou (2019), 606–621.Google Scholar
Pérez Jiménez, A. and Casadesús Bordoy, F. (eds.) (2001) Estudios sobre Plutarco: misticismo y religiones mistéricas en la obra de Plutarco. Actas del VII simposio Español sobre Plutarco, Palma de Mallorca, 2–4 de Noviembre de 2000. Madrid.Google Scholar
Pérez Jiménez, A. and del Cerro Calderón, G. (eds.) (1990) Estudios sobre Plutarco: obra y tradición. Málaga.Google Scholar
Pérez Jiménez, A., García López, J., and Aguilar, R. (eds.) (1999) Plutarco, Platón y Aristóteles. Actas del V Congreso Internacional de la I.P.S. (Madrid-Cuenca, 4–7 de mayo de 1999). Madrid.Google Scholar
Pérez Jiménez, A. and Macías Villalobos, C. (2009) Paradigmas de nuestra cultura: astrología y poder político en la Antigüedad : discurso pronunciado en el acto de ingreso en la Sociedad Erasmiana de Málaga por el Dr. D. Aurelio Pérez Jiménez, y contestación del Dr. D. Cristóbal Macías Villalobos: Málaga, 24 de abril de 2009. Málaga.Google Scholar
Pérez Jiménez, A. and Titchener, F. B. (eds.) (2005) Historical and Biographical Values of Plutarch’s Works: Studies Devoted to Professor Philip Stadter by the International Plutarch Society. Málaga.Google Scholar
Pérez Martín, I. (2019) “Maximos Planoudes and the transmission of Plutarch’s Moralia”, in Xenophontos and Oikonomopoulou (2019), 295–309.Google Scholar
Pérez Molina, M. and Guzmán Arias, C. (1991) “La presencia de Plutarco en la didascalia multiplex de F. Fernández de Córdova”, in García López and Calderón Dorda (1991), 191–199.Google Scholar
Pertusi, A. (1964) Leonzio Pilato fra Petrarca e Boccaccio: Le sue versioni omeriche negli autografi di Venezia e la cultura greca del primo Umanesimo. Venice.Google Scholar
Pertusi, A. Petrarca, F. (1996) Trionfi, Rime estravaganti, Codice degli abbozzi, eds. V. Pacca and L. Paolino. Milan.Google Scholar
Petropoulou, M.-Z. (2008) “Humans treated as animals: human sacrifice real and metaphorical”, in Alexandridis, , Wild, , and Winkler-Horaček, (eds.), 99–118.Google Scholar
Petrucci, F. M. (2016) “Argumentative strategies in the ‘Platonic section’ of Plutarch’s De Iside et Osiride (chapters 45–64)”, Mnemosyne 69: 226–248.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, S. (2008) “Der ägyptische ‘Tierkult’ im Spiegel der griechisch-römischen Literatur”, in Alexandridis, , Wild, , and Winkler-Horaček, (2008), 373–393.Google Scholar
Phillips, A. and Willcock, M. (eds.) (1999) Xenophon and Arrian, On Hunting. Warminster.Google Scholar
Piccione, R. (1998) “Plutarco nell’Anthologion di Giovanni Stobeo”, in Gallo (1998a), 161–201.Google Scholar
Piccirilli, L. (1989) “La tradizione ‘nera’ nelle biografie plutarchee degli Ateniesi del sesto e del quinto secolo”, in Ceresa-Gastaldo, A. (ed.), Gerolamo e la biografia letteraria. Genoa, 5–21.Google Scholar
Piccirilli, L. (1990a) “Introduzione”, in C. Carena, M. Manfredini, and L. Piccirilli (eds.) Plutarco: Le Vite di Cimone e di Lucullo. Milan, ix–xl.Google Scholar
Piccirilli, L. (1990b) “Nicia in Plutarco”, AALig 47: 351–368.Google Scholar
Piccirilli, L. (1993) “Introduzione to Nicia”, in Angeli Bertinelli, M., Carena, C., Manfredini, M., and Piccirilli, L. (eds.), Plutarco: Le Vite di Nicia e di Crasso. Milan, ix–xxviii.Google Scholar
Pietsch, E. (2005) “The Chronographia of Michael Psellos: history of emperors, autobiography and apology”, Bysantinska sällskapets Bulletin 23: 23–33.Google Scholar
Pimouguet-Pédarros, I. (2011) La cité à l’épreuve des rois. Le siège de Rhodes par Démétrios Poliorcète (305–304 av. J.-C.). Rennes.Google Scholar
Pineaux, J. (1986) “Un continuateur des Vies parallèles”, in Balard (1986), 331–342.Google Scholar
Pinheiro, J. (2013) Tempo e espaço da paideia nas Vidas de Plutarco. Coimbra.Google Scholar
Plese, Z. (2005) “Platonist Orientalism”, in Pérez Jiménez and Titchener (2005), 355–381.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, S. (ed.) (1999a) Plutarch’s Advice to the Bride and Groom and A Consolation to His Wife. New York.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, S. (1999b) “Reflections on Plutarch, Advice to the Bride and Groom: something old, something new, something borrowed”, in Pomeroy (1999a), 33–57.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, S. (1999c) “Reflections on Plutarch, Advice to the Bride and Groom”, in Pomeroy (1999a), 75–81.Google Scholar
Pordomingo Pardo, F. (1996) “El Plutarco de la biblioteca Universitaria de Salamanca: Manuscritos e impresos de los siglos XV y XVI”, in Fernández Delgado and Pordomingo Pardo (1996), 461–474.Google Scholar
Pordomingo Pardo, F. (1999) “El banquete de Plutarco: ficción literaria o realidad histórica?” in Montes Cala et al. (1999), 379–392.Google Scholar
Porter, J. (ed.) (2006a) Classical Pasts: The Classical Traditions of Greece and Rome. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Porter, J. (2006b) “Feeling classical: classicism and ancient literary criticism”, in Porter (2006a), 301–352.Google Scholar
Porter, J. (2006c) “What is ‘classical’ about classical antiquity?” in Porter (2006a), 1–65.Google Scholar
Porter, W. (ed.) (1937) Plutarch’s Life of Aratus. Dublin.Google Scholar
Powell, A. (1999) “Spartan women assertive in politics? Plutarch’s Lives of Agis and Kleomenes”, in Hodkinson, S. and Powell, A. (eds.), Sparta: New Perspectives. London, 393–419.Google Scholar
Powell, J. (ed.) (1988) Cicero. Cato Maior De Senectute. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Prandi, L. (2000) “Gli esempi del passato greco nei Precetti Politici di Plutarco”, RSA 30: 91–107.Google Scholar
Prandi, L. (2005) “Singolare e plurale nelle Vite greche di Plutarco”, in de Blois et al. (2005), 141–156.Google Scholar
Preston, R. (2001) “Roman questions, Greek answers: Plutarch and the construction of identity”, in Goldhill (2001b), 86–119.Google Scholar
Priestley, J. (2014) Herodotus and Hellenistic Culture: Literary Studies in the Reception of the Histories. Oxford.Google Scholar
Prior, W. J. (1991) Virtue and Knowledge: An Introduction to Ancient Greek Ethics. London.Google Scholar
Puech, B. (1983) “Grands-prêtres et helladarques d’Achaïe”, REA 85: 15–43.Google Scholar
Puech, B. (1992) “Prosopographie des amis de Plutarque,” ANRW II. 33.6: 4831–4893.Google Scholar
Pütz, B. (2014) “Good to laugh with: animals in comedy”, in Campbell (2014), 61–72.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. (2000) “Poets and lawgivers and the beginnings of political reflection in Greece, Ancient”, in Rowe, C. and Schofield, M. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rabbow, P. (1914) Antike Schriften über Seelenheilung und Seelenleitung auf ihre Quellen untersucht I, Die Therapie des Zorns. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Rabelais, F. (1994) Oeuvres complètes, ed. Huchon, M.. Paris.Google Scholar
Rabieh, L. (2006) Plato and the Virtue of Courage. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Racine, J. (1966) Oeuvres completes. 2 vols., ed. Picard, R.. Paris.Google Scholar
Radermacher, L. (1897) “Studien zur Geschichte der griechischen Rhetorik”, RhM 52: 412–424.Google Scholar
Raeymaekers, J. (1996) “The origins of the rivalry between Philopoemen and Flamininus”, AncSoc 27: 259–276.Google Scholar
Rajak, T. (2001) Jewish Dialogue with Greece and Rome. Leiden.Google Scholar
Ramírez-Araujo, A. (1954) “Usque ad aras amicus: Un adagio glosado por Cervantes”, HR 22: 224–227.Google Scholar
Ramírez de Verger, A. (1990) “Plutarco en el De orbe novo de Juan Ginés de Sepulveda”, in Pérez Jiménez and Del Cerro Calderón (1990), 271–276.Google Scholar
Ramón Palerm, V. (2000) “El De Herodoti malignitate de Plutarco come epideixis retórica”, in Van der Stockt (2000b), 387–398.Google Scholar
Ramón Palerm, V. (2011) “Plutarco y Juan de Pineda”, in Candau Morón (2011), 621–632.Google Scholar
Ramón Palerm, V. (forthcoming) “The irreligiosity of Herodotus: Plutarch’s view”, in Duff and Fletcher (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Ramos Maldonado, S. (1999) “Latin and vernacular in the works of Bernardino Gómez Miedes”, in Taylor, B. and Coroleu, A. (eds.), Latin and Vernacular in Renaissance Spain. Manchester, 105–111.Google Scholar
Reeve, M. (1991) “The rediscovery of classical texts in the Renaissance”, in Pecere, O. (ed.), Itinerari dei testi antichi. Rome, 115–147.Google Scholar
Rehdantz, C. and Blass, F. (1886) Demosthenes’ Neun Philippische Reden, 2.2, Indices, 4th ed. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Reinsch, D. (2019) “Plutarch in Michael Psellos’ Chronographia”, in Xenophontos and Oikonomopoulou (2019), 234–247.Google Scholar
Reinsch, D. and Kambylis, A. (eds.) (2001) Annae Comnenae Alexias. 2 vols. Berlin.Google Scholar
Relihan, J. C. (1992) “Re-thinking the history of the literary symposium”, ICS 17: 213–244.Google Scholar
Renehan, R. (1981) “The Greek anthropocentric view of man”, HSCPh 85: 239–259.Google Scholar
Renoirte, T. (1951) Les “Conseils politiques” de Plutarque: une lettre ouverte aux Grecs à l’époque de Trajan. Louvain.Google Scholar
Resta, G. (1962) Le epitomi di Plutarco nel Quattrocento. Padova.Google Scholar
Resta, G. (1986) “Francesco Filelfo tra Bisanzio e Roma”, in Avesani, R., Billanovich, G., Ferrari, M., and Pozzi, G. (eds.), Francesco Filelfo nel quinto centenario della morte. Atti del XVII convegno di studi maceratesi, Tolentino, 27–30 settembre, 1981. Padua, 1–60.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. (ed.) (2011) Thinking through Excerpts: Studies on Stobaeus (Monothéismes et philosophie). Turnhout.Google Scholar
Reynolds, B. (1954) “Bruni and Perotti present a Greek historian”, BiblH&R 16: 108–118.Google Scholar
Ribeiro Ferreira, J. (ed.) (2002) Plutarco Educador da Europa. Coimbra.Google Scholar
Ribeiro Ferreira, J. and Leão, D. (eds.) (2003) Os fragmentos de Plutarco e a recepção de sua obra. Coimbra.Google Scholar
Ribeiro Ferreira, J., Leão, D., Tröster, M., and Barata Dias, P. (eds.) (2009) Symposion and Philanthropia in Plutarch. Coimbra.Google Scholar
Ribeiro Ferreira, J., D. Leão, and C. Martins de Jesus (eds). (2012) “Nomos,” “Kosmos,” & “Dike” in Plutarch. Coimbra.Google Scholar
Rich, J. and G. Shipley (eds.) (1993), War and Society in the Roman World. London.Google Scholar
Richter, D. (2001) “Plutarch on Isis and Osiris: text, cult, and cultural appropriation”, TAPhA 131: 191–216.Google Scholar
Richter, D. S. and Johnson, W. A. (eds.) (2017) The Oxford Handbook of the Second Sophistic. New York.Google Scholar
Rist, J. (2001) “Plutarch’s Amatorius: a commentary on Plato’s theories of love?” CQ 51: 557–575.Google Scholar
Roberto, U. (ed.) (2005) Ioannis Antiocheni Fragmenta ex Historia chronica. Berlin.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, A. (in press). “Life of Lycurgus”, in Davies and Mossman (forthcoming in 2023).Google Scholar
Roig Lanzillotta, L. and Muñoz Gallarte, I. (eds.) (2012) Plutarch in the Religious and Philosophical Discourse of Late Antiquity. Leiden.Google Scholar
Roller, M. (2001) Constructing Autocracy: Aristocrats and Emperors in Julio-Claudian Rome. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Roller, M. (2003) “Horizontal women: posture and sex in the Roman convivium”, AJPh 124: 377–422.Google Scholar
Roller, M. (2006) Dining Posture in Ancient Rome: Bodies, Values, and Status. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Rollo, A. (2002) “Problemi e prospettive della ricerca su Manuele Crisolora”, in Maisano, and Rollo, (2002), 31–85.Google Scholar
Romano, R. (1994) “La Lysis inedita di Giovanni Grasso”, Koinonia 18: 199–210.Google Scholar
Romeri, L. (2002) Philosophes entre mots et mets: Plutarque, Lucien, Athénée autour de la table de Platon. Grenoble.Google Scholar
Rosenmeyer, T. (1985) “Ancient literary genres: a mirage?” Yearbook of Comparative and General Literature 34: 74–84.Google Scholar
Rosivach, V. (1984) “The Romans’ view of the Persians”, CW 78: 1–8.Google Scholar
Roskam, G. (1999) “Dionysus sublimated”, in Montes Cala et al. (1999), 433–445.Google Scholar
Roskam, G. (2004) “Plutarch on self and others”, AncSoc 34: 245–273.Google Scholar
Roskam, G. (2004–5) “Τὸ καλὸν αὐτὸ [. .] ἔχοντας τέλος (Praec. ger. reip. 799a). Plutarch on the foundation of the politician’s career”, Ploutarchos 2: 89–103.Google Scholar
Roskam, G. (2005a) “Political education in the service of the public interest: Plutarch on the motivation of the statesman”, in Jufresa et al. (2005), 133–138.Google Scholar
Roskam, G. (2005b) On the Path to Virtue: The Stoic Doctrine of Moral Progress and Its Reception in (Middle) Platonism. Leuven.Google Scholar
Roskam, G. (2007a) A Commentary on Plutarch’s “De latenter vivendo.” Leuven.Google Scholar
Roskam, G. (2007b) “Plutarch’s attack on Epicurus’ ideal of an ‘unnoticed life’: polemical strategies in De latenter vivendo”, in Nieto Ibáñez and López López (2007), 867–876.Google Scholar
Roskam, G. (2009a) “Educating the young … over wine? Plutarch, Calvenus Taurus, and Favorinus as convivial teachers”, in Ribeiro Ferreira et al. (2009), 369–383.Google Scholar
Roskam, G. (2009b) Plutarch’s Maxime com principibus philosopho esse disserendum: An Interpretation with Commentary. Leuven.Google Scholar
Roskam, G. (2010) “Plutarch’s ‘Socratic symposia’: the Symposia of Plato and Xenophon as literary models in the Quaestiones Convivales”, Athenaeum 98: 45–70.Google Scholar
Roskam, G. (2010–11) “How to deal with the philosophical tradition? Some general rules in Plutarch’s anti-Epicurean treatises”, Ploutarchos: 8: 133–146.Google Scholar
Roskam, G. (2011a) “Ambition and love of fame in Plutarch’s Lives of Agis, Cleomenes, and the Gracchi”, CPh 106: 208–225.Google Scholar
Roskam, G. (2011b) “Aristotle in middle Platonism: the case of Plutarch of Chaeronea”, in Bénatouïl, T., Maffi, E., and Trabattoni, F. (eds.), Plato, Aristotle, or Both? Dialogues between Platonism and Aristotelianism in Antiquity. Hildesheim, 35–61.Google Scholar
Roskam, G. (2011c) “Plutarch against Epicurus on affection for offspring: a reading of De amore prolis”, in Roskam and Van der Stockt (2011), 175–201.Google Scholar
Roskam, G. (2014) “Philanthropy, dignity, and euergetism”, in Beck (2014a), 516–528.Google Scholar
Roskam, G. (2017) “Discussing the past: moral vision, truth and benevolence in Plutarch’s On the Malice of Herodotus”, in Georgiadou and Oikonomopoulou (2017), 161–173.Google Scholar
Roskam, G. (2021) Plutarch: New Surveys in the Classics, 47. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Roskam, G. (forthcoming) “Dancing away the truth: Plutarch’s polemical approach in On the malice of Herodotus”, in Duff and Fletcher (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Roskam, G. and Van der Stockt, L. (eds.) (2011) Virtues for the People: Aspects of Plutarchan Ethics. Leuven.Google Scholar
Roskam, G., De Pourcq, M., and Van der Stockt, L. (eds.) (2012) The Lash of Ambition: Plutarch, Imperial Greek Literature and the Dynamics of Philotimia. Leuven.Google Scholar
Rossi, A. (2000) “The camp of Pompey: strategy of representation in Caesar’s Bellum Ciuile”, CJ 95: 239–256.Google Scholar
Rossi, V. and Bosco, U. (eds.) (1933–42) Le Familiari, I–IV. Edizione nazionale delle opere di Francesco Petrarca X–XIII. Florence.Google Scholar
Rotroff, S. I. and Hoff, M. C. (eds.) (1997) The Romanization of Athens: proceedings of an international conference held at Lincoln, Nebraska (April 1996). Oxbow monograph; 94. Oxford.Google Scholar
Roueché, C. (2002) “The literary background of Kekaumenos”, in Holmes, C. and Waring, J. (eds.), Literacy, Education and Manuscript Transmission in Byzantium and Beyond. Leiden, 111–138.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J. (1964) Oeuvres completes: Vol. I, eds. Spink, J., Wirz, C., Burgelin, P., Gouhier, H., de Vilmorin, R., and Gagnebin, B.. Paris.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J. (1969) Oeuvres completes: Vol. IV, eds. Spink, J., Wirz, C., Burgelin, P., Gouhier, H., de Vilmorin, R., and Gagnebin, B.. Paris.Google Scholar
Roux, P. de (ed.) (1986) M.-J. Roland: Mémoires. Paris.Google Scholar
Runciman, S. (1970) The Last Byzantine Renaissance. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Russell, D. (1963) “Plutarch’s Life of Coriolanus”, JRS 53: 21–28. Reprinted in Scardigli (1995), 357–372.Google Scholar
Russell, D. (1966a) “On reading Plutarch’s Lives”, G&R 13: 139–154. Reprinted in Scardigli (1995), 75–94.Google Scholar
Russell, D. (1966b) “Plutarch, ‘Alcibiades’ 1–16,” PCPhS 12: 37–47. Reprinted in Scardigli (1995), 191–207.Google Scholar
Russell, D. (1968) “On reading Plutarch’s Moralia”, G&R 15: 130–146.Google Scholar
Russell, D. (1973a) Plutarch. London.Google Scholar
Russell, D. (1973b) “Remarks on Plutarch’s de vitando aere alieno”, JHS 93: 163–171.Google Scholar
Russell, D. (1983) Greek Declamation. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Russell, D. (1989) “Greek criticism of the Empire”, in Kennedy, G. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism: Vol. I. Classical Criticism. Cambridge, 297–329.Google Scholar
Russell, D. (1992) “ἦθος nei dialoghi di Plutarco”, ASNP 32: 399–429.Google Scholar
Russell, D. (1993) Plutarch: Selected Essays and Dialogues. Oxford.Google Scholar
Russell, D. (1997) “Plutarch, Amatorius 13–18”, in Mossman (1997a), 99–111.Google Scholar
Russell, D. (2010) “Introduction”, in Nesselrath (2010), 3–15.Google Scholar
Said, E. (1978) Orientalism: Western Conceptions of the Orient. New York.Google Scholar
Saïd, S. (1994) “Lucien ethnographe”, in A. Billault (ed.), Lucien de Samosate. Lyon, 149–170.Google Scholar
Saïd, S. (2001) “The discourse of identity in Greek rhetoric from Isocrates to Aristides”, in Malkin, (2001), 275–299.Google Scholar
Saïd, S. (2002) “Greeks and Barbarians in Euripides’ tragedies: the end of differences?” in Harrison (2002), 62–100.Google Scholar
Saïd, S. (2005a) “Poésie et éducation chez Plutarque ou comment convertir la poésie en introduction à la philosophie”, in Jufresa, et al. (2005), 147–176.Google Scholar
Saïd, S. (2005b) “Plutarch and the people in the Parallel Lives”, in de Blois et al. (2005), 7–25.Google Scholar
Saint-Évremond, C. de (1962) Oeuvres en prose: Vol. I, ed. Ternois, R.. Paris.Google Scholar
Saint-Évremond, C. de (1969), Oeuvres en prose: Vol. IV, ed. R. Ternois (Paris).Google Scholar
Sainte-Beuve, C. A. (1839) Critiques et portraits littéraires: Vol. 5 (Paris).Google Scholar
Sainte-Beuve, C. A. (1844) Portraits littéraires: Vol. 2, 2nd ed. Paris.Google Scholar
Salcedo Parrondo, M. (2005) “Un león en la ciudad: el perfil leonino del Alcibíades de Plutarco”, in Boulogne (2005b), 135–141.Google Scholar
Salmeri, G. (2000) “Dio, Rome and the civic life of Asia Minor”, in Swain, S. (ed.), Dio Chrysostom: Politics, Letters and Philosophy. Oxford, 53–92.Google Scholar
Salmeri, G. (2011) “Reconstructing the political life and culture of the Greek cities of the Roman Empire”, in van Nijf, and Alston (2011), 197–214.Google Scholar
Salmon, P. (1984) “Racisme ou refus de la difference dans le monde greco-romain”, DHA 10: 75–98.Google Scholar
Salutati, C. (1891–1911) Epistolario, I–IV, ed. Novati, F.. Rome.Google Scholar
Salutati, C. (1985) De fato et fortuna, ed. Bianca, C.. Florence.Google Scholar
Sancho Montés, S. (2005) “Plutarc a la Primera Part de la Història de València d’en Pere-Antoni Beuter”, in Jufresa et al. (2005), 835–842.Google Scholar
Sancisi-Weerdenburg, H. (2001) “Yauna by the sea and across the sea”, in Malkin, (2001), 323–346.Google Scholar
Sandbach, F. H. (1939) “Rhythm and authenticity in Plutarch’s Moralia”, CQ 33: 194–203.Google Scholar
Sandbach, F. H. (1941) “Some textual notes on Plutarch’s Moralia”, CQ 35: 110–118.Google Scholar
Sandbach, F. H. (ed. and trans.) (1969) Plutarch’s Moralia. Vol. XV Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Sansone, D. (ed. and trans.) (1989) Plutarch: The Lives of Aristeides and Cato. Warminster.Google Scholar
Santese, G. (1994) “Animali e razionalità in Plutarco”, in Castignone, S. and Lanata, G. (eds.), Filosofi e animali nel mondo antico. Pisa, 141–170.Google Scholar
Santese, G. (2005) “Plutarco, il linguaggio e la trasmissione delle conoscenze nel mondo animale”, in Jufresa et al. (2005), 453–461.Google Scholar
Scannapieco, R. (2007) “‘Voi che per li occhi mi passaste ’l core …’: parola e imagine nell’Amatorius di Plutarco”, in Volpe Cacciatore and Ferrari (2007), 125–170.Google Scholar
Scardigli, B. (ed.) (1995) Essays on Plutarch’s Lives. Oxford.Google Scholar
Schadee, H. (2016) “Alfonso ‘the Magnanimous’ of Naples as portrayed by Facio and Panormita: four versions of emulation, representation, and virtue”, in Baker, et al. (2016), 95–120.Google Scholar
Schamp, J. (1995) “Le Plutarque de Photios”, AC 64: 155–184.Google Scholar
Schamp, J. (2000) Les Vies des dix orateurs attiques. Fribourg.Google Scholar
Schenkeveld, D. (1982) “The structure of Plutarch’s De audiendis poetis”, Mnemosyne 35: 60–71. Reprinted in Laird (2006), 313–324.Google Scholar
Schepens, G. (2000) “Plutarch’s view of ancient Rome: some remarks on the Life of Pyrrhus”, in Mooren (ed.), L., Politics, Administration and Society in the Hellenistic and Roman World. Leuven, 349–364.Google Scholar
Schmid, W. (1887–96) Der Atticismus, 4 vols. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Schmidt, T. (1999) Plutarque et les barbares: La rhétorique d’une image. Leuven.Google Scholar
Schmidt, T. (2000) “La Rhétorique des doublets chez Plutarque: le cas de βάρβαρος καὶ […]”, in Van der Stockt (2000b), 455–464.Google Scholar
Schmidt, T. (2002) “Plutarch’s timeless barbarians and the age of Trajan”, in Stadter and Van der Stockt (2002), 57–72.Google Scholar
Schmidt, T. (2004) “Barbarians in Plutarch’s political thought”, in de Blois et al. (2004), 227–235.Google Scholar
Schmidt, T. (2008) “Les Questions barbares de Plutarque: un essai de reconstitution”, Recherches sur les rhétoriques religieuses 8: 165–183.Google Scholar
Schmidt, T. (2011) “Sophistes, barbares et identité grecque: le cas de Dion Chrysostome”, in Schmidt, T. and Fleury, P. (eds.), Perceptions of the Second Sophistic and Its Times – Regards sur la Seconde Sophistique et son époque. Toronto, 105–119.Google Scholar
Schmidt, T., Vamvouri, M., and Hirsch-Luipold, R. (eds.) (2020) The Dynamics of Intertextuality in Plutarch. Leiden.Google Scholar
Schmitt Pantel, P. (1990) “Sacrificial meal and symposion: two models of civic institutions in the archaic city”, in Murray, (1990), 14–33.Google Scholar
Schmitt-Pantel, P. (1992) La cité au banquet: Histoire des repas publics dans les cités grecques. Rome.Google Scholar
Schmitt-Pantel, P. (1999) “Manger entre citoyens: les repas dans les cités grecques antiques”, in Flandrin, and Cobbi, (1999), 39–57.Google Scholar
Schmitt-Pantel, P. (2003) “Le Banquet et le ‘genre’ sur les images grecques, propos sur les compagnes et les compagnons”, Pallas 61: 83–95.Google Scholar
Schmitt-Pantel, P. (2009) Hommes illustres: moeurs et politique à Athènes au Ve siècle. Paris.Google Scholar
Schmitz, T. (1997) Bildung und Macht: zur sozialen und politischen Funktion der zweiten Sophistik in der griechischen Welt der Kaiserzeit. Munich.Google Scholar
Schmitz, T. (2014) “Plutarch and the Second Sophistic”, in Beck (2014a), 32–42.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1999) Saving the City: Philosopher-Kings and Other Classical Paradigms. London.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2003) “Stoic ethics”, in Inwood, (2003), 233–256.Google Scholar
Schoppe, C. (1994) Plutarchs Interpretation der Ideenlehre Platons. Münster.Google Scholar
Schorn, S. (2009) “Tears of the bereaved: Plutarch’s Consolatio ad uxorem in context”, in Fögen (2009), 335–365.Google Scholar
Schrader, C., Ramón, V., and Vela, J. (eds.) (1997) Plutarco y la Historia: Actas del V Simposio Español sobre Plutarco, Zaragoza 20–22 de junio de 1996. Zaragoza.Google Scholar
Schriefl, A. (2013) Platons Kritik an Geld und Reichtum. Berlin.Google Scholar
Schröder, S. (ed.) (1990) Plutarchs Schrift de Pythiae oraculis. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Schröder, S. (2010) “Plutarch on oracles and divine inspiration”, in Nesselrath (2010), 145–167.Google Scholar
Schroeter, J. (1911) Plutarchs Stellung zur Skepsis. Diss., University of Königsberg.Google Scholar
Schütrumpf, E. (1987) “The rhetra of Epitadeus: a Platonist’s fiction”, GRBS 28: 441–457.Google Scholar
Schwabl, H. (1962) “Das Bild der fremden Welt bei den frühen Griechen”, in , H. (eds.), Grecs et barbares. (Entretiens Hardt, VIII). Geneva, 1–36.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. (2003) “Rome in the Greek novel? Images and ideas of empire in Chariton’s Persia”, Arethusa 36: 375–394.Google Scholar
Scott, R. (1981) “The classical tradition in Byzantine historiography”, in Mullett, M. and Scott, R. (eds.), Byzantium and the Classical Tradition. Birmingham, 61–74.Google Scholar
Seager, R. (1980) “Neu sinas Medos equitare inultos: Horace, the Parthians and Augustan foreign policy”, Athenaeum 58: 103–118.Google Scholar
Seavey, W. (1991) “Forensic epistolography and Plutarch’s de Herodoti malignitate”, Hellas 2: 33–45.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (2012) The Philosophy of Antiochus. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Senzasono, L. (1997) “Health and politics in Plutarch’s De Tuenda Sanitate Praecepta”, in Mossman (1997a), 113–118.Google Scholar
Setton, K. (1956) “The Byzantine background to the Italian Renaissance”, PAPhS 100: 1–76.Google Scholar
Ševčenko, I. (1962) Études sur la polémique entre Théodore Métochite et Nicéphore Choumnos. Brussels.Google Scholar
Ševčenko, I. (1975) “Theodore Metochites, the Chora, and the intellectual trends of his time”, in Underwood, P. (ed.), The Kariye Djami, vol. IV: Studies in the Art of the Kariye Djami and Its Intellectual Background. Princeton, NJ: 19–91.Google Scholar
Ševčenko, I. (1992) “Re-reading Constantine Porphyrogenitus”, in Shepard, J. and Franklin, S. (eds.), Byzantine Diplomacy: Papers from the Twenty-Fourth Spring Symposium of Byzantine Studies, Cambridge, March 1990. Aldershot, 167–195.Google Scholar
Ševčenko, I. (ed.) (2011) Chronographiae quae Theophanis Continuati nomine fertur liber quo Vita Basilii imperatoris amplectitur (Corpus Fontium Historiae Byzantinae 42). Berlin.Google Scholar
Shepard, J. (ed.) (2008) The Cambridge History of the Byzantine Empire c. 500–1492. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sheppard, A. (1984–6) “Homonoia in the Greek cities in the Roman empire”, AncSoc 15–17: 229–252.Google Scholar
Shipley, D. (1997) Plutarch’s Life of Agesilaos: Response to Sources in the Presentation of Character. Oxford.Google Scholar
Shumate, N. (1996) Crisis and Conversion in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Simonetti, E. (2017) A Perfect Medium? Oracular Divination in the Thought of Plutarch. Leuven.Google Scholar
Simpson, A. (2019) “Precepts, paradigms and evaluations: Niketas Choniates’ use of Plutarch”, in Xenophontos and Oikonomopoulou (2019), 279–294.Google Scholar
Sinor, D. (1957) “Les Barbares”, Diogène 18: 52–68.Google Scholar
Sion-Jenkis, K. (2000) Von der Republik zum Prinzipat: Ursachen für den Verfassungswechsel in Rom im historischen Denken der Antike. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Sirinelli, J. (2000) Plutarque de Chéronée: Un philosophe dans le siècle. Paris.Google Scholar
Slater, W. (ed.) (1991) Dining in a Classical Context. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Small, J. (1997) Wax Tablets of the Mind: Cognitive Studies of Memory and Literacy in Classical Antiquity. London.Google Scholar
Smith, R. (1992) “Photius on the ten orators”, GRBS 33: 159–189.Google Scholar
Smith, S. (2014) Man and Animal in Severan Rome: The Literary Imagination of Claudius Aelian. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Snell, B. (1954) “Zur Geschichte vom Gastmahl der Sieben Weisen”, in Hiltbrunner, O. (ed.), Thesaurismata: Festschrift für Ida Kapp zum 70. Geburtstag. Munich, 105–111.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. (1983) Time, Creation, and the Continuum: Theories in Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages. London.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. (1993) Animal Minds and Human Morals. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. (1997) “Esprits d’animaux”, in Cassin, and Labarrière, (1997), 355–373.Google Scholar
Späth, T. (2007) “Blick auf Helden statt Blick auf Rom: Plutarchs Rezepte für ein globales Bankett der Moral”, in Freyburger, M.-L. and Meyer, D. (eds.), Visions grecques de Rome: Griechische Blicke auf Rom. Paris, 143–170.Google Scholar
Spawforth, A. (1994) “Symbol of unity? The Persian Wars tradition in the Roman Empire”, in Hornblower (ed.), S., Greek Historiography. Oxford, 233–247.Google Scholar
Spencer, T. (ed.) (1964) Shakespeare’s Plutarch. Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Speyer, W. (1989) “Die Griechen und die Fremdvölker. Kulturbegegnungen und Wege zur gegenseitigen Verständigung”, Eos 77: 17–29.Google Scholar
Stadter, P. (1965) Plutarch’s Historical Methods: An Analysis of the Mulierum Virtutes. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Stadter, P. (1973a) “Planudes, Plutarch, and Pace of Ferrara”, IMU 16: 137–162.Google Scholar
Stadter, P. (1973b) “Thucydidean orators in Plutarch”, in Stadter, P. (ed.), The Speeches in Thucydides. Chapel Hill, NC, 109–123.Google Scholar
Stadter, P. (1975) “Plutarch’s comparison of Pericles and Fabius Maximus”, GRBS 16: 77–85. Reprinted in Scardigli (1995), 155–164.Google Scholar
Stadter, P. (1976) “Xenophon in Arrian’s Cynegeticus”, GRBS 17: 157–167.Google Scholar
Stadter, P. (1987) “The rhetoric of Plutarch’s Pericles”, AncSoc 18: 251–269.Google Scholar
Stadter, P. (1988) “The proems of Plutarch’s Lives”, ICS 13: 275–295.Google Scholar
Stadter, P. (1989) A Commentary on Plutarch’s Pericles. Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar
Stadter, P. (1992a) “Paradoxical paradigms: Lysander and Sulla”, in Stadter (1992b), 41–55. Reprinted in Stadter (2015a), 258–269.Google Scholar
Stadter, P. (ed.) (1992b) Plutarch and the Historical Tradition. London.Google Scholar
Stadter, P. (1995) “Subject to the erotic: male sexual behaviour in Plutarch”, in Innes, Hine, and Pelling (1995), 221–236.Google Scholar
Stadter, P. (1996) “Anecdotes and the thematic structure of Plutarchean biography”, in Fernández Delgado and Pordomingo Pardo (1996), 291–303.Google Scholar
Stadter, P. (1997) “Plutarch’s Lives: the statesman as moral actor”, in Schrader, Ramón, and Vela (1997), 65–81. Reprinted in Stadter (2015a), 215–230.Google Scholar
Stadter, P. (1999a) “Philosophos and philandros: Plutarch’s view of women in the Moralia and the Lives”, in Pomeroy (1999a), 173–182.Google Scholar
Stadter, P. (1999b) “Plato in Plutarch’s Lives of Lycurgus and Agesilaus”, in Pérez Jiménez, , García López, , and Aguilar, (eds.) 1999), 475–486.Google Scholar
Stadter, P. (1999c) “Drinking, table talk and Plutarch’s contemporaries”, in Montes Cala et al. (1999), 481–490. Reprinted in Stadter (2015a), 98–107.Google Scholar
Stadter, P. (2000) “The rhetoric of virtue in Plutarch’s Lives”, in Van der Stockt (2000b), 493–510. Reprinted in Stadter (2015a), 231–245.Google Scholar
Stadter, P. (2002) “Plutarch’s Lives and their Roman readers”, in Ostenfeld, E. N. (ed.), Greek Romans and Roman Greeks: Studies in Cultural Interaction. Aarhus, 123–135. Reprinted in Stadter (2015a), 45–55.Google Scholar
Stadter, P. (2003–4) “Mirroring virtue in Plutarch’s Lives”, Ploutarchos n.s. 1: 89–96.Google Scholar
Stadter, P. (2004) “Plutarch: diplomat for Delphi?” in de Blois et al. (2004), 19–31. Reprinted in Stadter (2015a), 70–81.Google Scholar
Stadter, P. (2005a) “Plutarco fra presente e passato”, in Jufresa et al. (2005a), 653–658.Google Scholar
Stadter, P. (2005b) “Revisiting Plutarch’s Lives of the Caesars”, in Pérez Jiménez and Titchener (2005), 405–422. Reprinted in Stadter (2015a), 56–69.Google Scholar
Stadter, P. (2008) “Notes and anecdotes: observations on cross-genre Apophthegmata”, in Nikolaidis (2008), 53–66.Google Scholar
Stadter, P. (2010) “Parallels in three dimensions”, in Humble (2010b), 197–216. Reprinted in Stadter (2015a), 286–302.Google Scholar
Stadter, P. (2010–11) “How to deal with the philosophical tradition? Some general rules in Plutarch’s anti-Epicurean treatises”, Ploutarchos 8: 133–146.Google Scholar
Stadter, P. (2011) “Competition and its costs: philonikia in Plutarch’s society and heroes”, in Roskam and Van der Stockt (2011), 237–255. Reprinted in Stadter (2015a), 270–285.Google Scholar
Stadter, P. (2012) “The philosopher’s ambition: Plutarch, Arrian and Marcus Aurelius”, in Roskam, De Pourcq and Van der Stockt (2012), 85–98. Reprinted in Stadter (2015a), 199–211.Google Scholar
Stadter, P. (2014) “Plutarch’s compositional technique: the anecdote collections and the Parallel Lives”, GRBS 54: 665–686.Google Scholar
Stadter, P. (2015a) Plutarch and His Roman Readers. Oxford.Google Scholar
Stadter, P. (2015b) “Friends or patrons?” in Stadter (2015a), 21–44.Google Scholar
Stadter, P. (2015c) “Plutarch’s Latin reading: Cicero’s Lucullus and Horace’s Epistle 1.6”, in Stadter (2015a), 130–148.Google Scholar
Stadter, P. (2017) “Discussing the past: moral vision, truth and benevolence in Plutarch’s On the Malice of Herodotus”, in Georgiadou and Oikonomopoulou (2017), 161–173.Google Scholar
Stadter, P. and Van der Stockt, L. (eds.) (2002) Sage and Emperor: Plutarch, Greek intellectuals and Roman Power in the time of Trajan (98–117 AD). Leuven.Google Scholar
Stamatopoulou, Z. (2014) “Hesiodic poetry and wisdom in Plutarch’s Symposium of the Seven Sages”, AJPh 135: 533–558.Google Scholar
Stanford, W. (1954) The Ulysses Theme. Oxford.Google Scholar
Stanton, G. (1973) “Sophists and philosophers: problems of classification”, AJPh 94: 350–364.Google Scholar
Steidle, W. (1951) Sueton und die antike Biographie. Munich.Google Scholar
Steiner, G. (2005) Anthropocentrism and Its Discontents: The Moral Status of Animals in the History of Western Philosophy. Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
Steiner, G. (2008) “Das Tier bei Aristoteles und den Stoikern: Evolution eines kosmischen Prinzips”, in Alexandridis, Wild, and Winkler-Horaček (eds.), 27–46.Google Scholar
Steiner, G. (2009–10) “Plutarch on the question of justice for animals”, Ploutarchos 7: 73–82.Google Scholar
Stem, S. R. (2012) The Political Biographies of Cornelius Nepos. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Stevenson, R. (1997) Persica. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Stok, F. (1998) “Le traduzioni latine dei Moralia di Plutarco”, Fontes 1: 117–136.Google Scholar
Strachey, L. (1928) Elizabeth and Essex. London.Google Scholar
Striker, G. (1991) “Following nature: a study in Stoic ethics”, OSAPh 9: 1–73.Google Scholar
Striker, G. (1994) “Plato’s Socrates and the Stoics”, in Vander Waerdt, P. (ed.), The Socratic Movement.Ithaca, NY, 241–251.Google Scholar
Strobach, A. (1997) Plutarch und die Sprachen: Ein Beitrag zur Fremdsprachenproblematik in der Antike. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Stronk, J. (2010) Ctesias’ Persian History: Introduction, Text, and Translation. Düsseldorf.Google Scholar
Swain, S. (1988) “Plutarch’s Philopoemen and Flamininus”, ICS 13: 335–347.Google Scholar
Swain, S. (1989a) “Plutarch’s Aemilius and Timoleon”, Historia 38: 314–334.Google Scholar
Swain, S. (1989b) “Character change in Plutarch”, Phoenix 43: 62–68.Google Scholar
Swain, S. (1990a) “Hellenic culture and the Roman heroes of Plutarch”, JHS 110: 126–145. Reprinted in Scardigli (1995), 229–264.Google Scholar
Swain, S. (1990b) “Plutarch’s Lives of Cicero, Cato, and Brutus”, Hermes 118: 192–203.Google Scholar
Swain, S. (1992a) “Plutarchan synkrisis”, Eranos 90: 101–111.Google Scholar
Swain, S. (1992b) “Plutarch’s characterization of Lucullus”, RhM 135: 307–316.Google Scholar
Swain, S. (1996) Hellenism and Empire: Language, Classicism, and Power in the Greek World, AD 50–250. Oxford.Google Scholar
Swain, S. (1997) “Plato, Plutarch, Athens and Rome”, in Barnes, J. and Griffin, M. (eds.), Philosophia Togata ii: Plato and Aristotle at Rome. Oxford, 165–187.Google Scholar
Swift, L. (2010) The Hidden Chorus: Echoes of Genre in Tragic Lyric. Oxford.Google Scholar
Syme, R. (1958) Tacitus. 2 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar
Tagliasacchi, A. (1960) “Plutarco e la tragedia greca”, Dioniso 34: 124–142.Google Scholar
Takho, T. and Lowe, E. (2015) “Ontological dependence”, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/dependence-ontological).Google Scholar
Taplin, O. (1986) “Fifth-century tragedy and comedy: a synkrisis”, JHS 106: 163–174. Reprinted in E. Segal (ed.) (1996) Oxford Readings in Aristophanes. Oxford, 9–28.Google Scholar
Tarrant, H. (1993) Thrasyllan Platonism. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Tarrant, H. (2000) Plato’s First Interpreters. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Tartaglia, L. (1987) “Il Saggio su Plutarco di Teodoro Metochita”, in Talariskos: Studia graeca Antonio Garzya sexagenario a discipulis oblata. Naples, 339–362.Google Scholar
Tatum, W. (2010) “Why parallel lives?” in Humble (2010b), 1–22.Google Scholar
Taufer, M. (1999) “Er e Tespesio: Plutarco interprete di Platone”, Lexis 17: 303–318.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. (2003) Animals and Ethics: An Overview of the Philosophical Debate. Peterborough.Google Scholar
Teague, F. (1992) “Letters and portents in Julius Caesar and King Lear”, Shakespeare Yearbook 3: 87–104.Google Scholar
Tecuşan, M. (1993) Symposion and Philosophy. D.Phil. thesis, Oxford University.Google Scholar
Teodorsson, S.-T. (1989) A Commentary on Plutarch’s Table Talks, vol. I. Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Teodorsson, S.-T. (1990) A Commentary on Plutarch’s Table Talks, vol. II. Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Teodorsson, S.-T. (1996) A Commentary on Plutarch’s Table Talks, vol. III. Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Teodorsson, S.-T. (1997) “Ethical historiography: Plutarch’s attitude to historical criticism”, in Schrader, Ramón, and Vela (1997), 439–447.Google Scholar
Teodorsson, S.-T. (1999) “Dionysus moderated and calmed”, in Montes Cala et al. (1999), 57–69.Google Scholar
Teodorsson, S.-T. (2000) “Plutarch’s use of synonyms: a typical feature of his style”, in Van der Stockt (2000b), 511–518.Google Scholar
Teodorsson, S.-T. (2005) “Plutarcho innovatore del vocabulario Greco”, in Pérez Jiménez and Titchener (2005), 405–418.Google Scholar
Teodorsson, S.-T. (2007–8) “Health is wealth: Plutarch on contemporary luxury”, Ploutarchos 5: 81–90.Google Scholar
Teodorsson, S.-T. (2009) “The place of Plutarch in the literary genre of symposium”, in Ribeiro Ferreira et al. (2009), 3–16.Google Scholar
Terian, A. (ed.) (1981) Philonis Alexandrini de Animalibus. Chico, CA.Google Scholar
Theander, C. (1951) Plutarch und die Geschichte. Lund.Google Scholar
Thériault, G. (1996) Le culte d’Homonoia dans les cités grecques. Lyon.Google Scholar
Thompson, L. (1979) “Strabo on civilization”, Platon 31: 213–219.Google Scholar
Thumiger, C. (2014a) “Animals in tragedy”, in Campbell (2014), 84–98.Google Scholar
Thumiger, C. (2014b) “Metamorphosis: human into animals”, in Campbell (2014), 384–413.Google Scholar
Timotin, A. (2012) La démonologie platonicienne. Histoire de la notion de daimōn de Platon aux derniers néoplatoniciens. Leiden.Google Scholar
Titchener, F. B. (1991) “Why did Plutarch write about Nicias?” AHB 5: 153–158.Google Scholar
Titchener, F. (1999) “Everything to do with Dionysus”, in Montes Cala et al. (1999), 491–499.Google Scholar
Titchener, F. (2008) “Is Plutarch’s Nicias devout, superstitious, or both?” in Nikolaidis (2008), 277–283.Google Scholar
Titchener, F. (2009) “The role of reality in Plutarch’s Quaestiones Convivales”, in Ribeiro Ferreira et al. (2009), 395–401.Google Scholar
Titchener, F. (2011) “Plutarch’s Table Talk: sampling a rich blend – a survey of scholarly appraisal”, in Klotz and Oikonomopoulou (2011a), 34–48.Google Scholar
Tovar Paz, F.-J. (1996) “El motivo de la ‘caza’ en De Sollertia Animalium de Plutarco”, in Fernández Delgado and Pordomingo Pardo (1996), 211–217.Google Scholar
Tozza, M. (2008–9) “Gli epiteti omerici nel Grillo di Plutarco: parallelismo simbolico tra animali e divinità”, Ploutarchos 6: 45–52.Google Scholar
Tozza, M. (2012) “Animali parlanti e giustizia in Plutarco ed Omero”, in Ribeiro Ferreira, Leão, and Martins de Jesus (2012), 191–199.Google Scholar
Trapp, M. (1999) “Socrates, the Phaedo and the Lives of Phocion and Cato the Younger”, in Pérez Jiménez, García López, and Aguilar (1999), 487–499.Google Scholar
Trapp, M. (2004) “Statesmanship in a minor key? The An seni and the Praecepta gerendae rei publicae”, in de Blois et al. (2004), 189–200.Google Scholar
Trapp, M. (2007) Philosophy in the Roman Empire: Ethics, Politics and Society. Aldershot.Google Scholar
Treadgold, W. (1980) The Nature of the Bibliotheca of Photius. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Trego, K. (2012–13) “Competition in context: philonikia in Agesilaus–Pompey”, Ploutarchos 10: 63–74.Google Scholar
Tritle, L. (1988) Phocion the Good. London.Google Scholar
Tröster, M. (2008) Themes, Character, and Politics in Plutarch’s Life of Lucullus: The Construction of a Roman Aristocrat. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Tröster, M. (2009) “Banquet and philhellenism in the Lives of Flamininus and Aemilius Paullus”, in Ribeiro Ferreira et al. (2009), 165–179.Google Scholar
Tröster, M. (2012) “Plutarch and Mos Maiorum in the Life of Aemilius Paullus”, AncSoc 42: 219–254.Google Scholar
Tröster, M. (2014) “Cimone come benefattore panellenico e campione di concordia: Una proiezione di Plutarco?” RSA 44: 9–28.Google Scholar
Tsekourakis, D. (1983) Οἱ Λαϊκοφιλοσοφικὲς πραγματεῖες τοῦ Πλουτάρχου. Ἡ σχέση τους μὲ τὴ “διατριβὴ” καὶ μὲ ἄλλα παραπλήσια γραμματειακὰ εἴδη. (Ἀριστοτέλειο Πανεπιστήμιο Θεσσαλονίκης, Ἐπιστημονικὴ Ἐπετηρίδα Φιλοσοφικῆς Σχολῆς 34). Thessaloniki.Google Scholar
Tsekourakis, D. (1987) “Pythagoreanism or Platonism and ancient medicine? The reasons for vegetarianism in Plutarch’s Moralia”, ANRW II.36.1, 366–393.Google Scholar
Tsouvala, G. (2014) “Love and marriage”, in Beck (2014a), 191–206.Google Scholar
Tuplin, C. (1996) Achaemenid Studies. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Tutrone, F. (2012) Filosofi e animali in Roma antica: Modelli di animalità e umanità in Lucrezio e Seneca. Pisa.Google Scholar
Ullman, B. (1963) The Humanism of Coluccio Salutati. Padua.Google Scholar
Ungefehr-Kortus, C. (1996) Anacharsis, der Typus des edlen, weisen Barbaren – Ein Beitrag zum Verständnis griechischer Fremdheitserfahrung. Bern.Google Scholar
Ure, P. (1958) “Chapman’s use of North’s Plutarch in Caesar and Pompey”, Review of English Studies 9.35: 281–284.Google Scholar
Usener, H. (1887) Epicurea. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Uthemann, K.-H. and Görgemanns, H. (2006) “Diatribe”, in Cancik, H. and Schneider, H. (eds.), Brill’s New Pauly: Encyclopedia of the Ancient World, at https://referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/brill-s-new-pauly/diatribe-e316870. Leiden.Google Scholar
Valgiglio, E. (1975) “Basilio Magno Ad Adulescentes e Plutarco De Audiendis Poetis”, Rivista di Studi Classici 23: 67–85.Google Scholar
Valgiglio, E. (ed.) (1976) Plutarco: Praecepta gerendae reipublicae. Milan.Google Scholar
Valgiglio, E. (1982) “Alcuni aspetti di Cicerone come fonte di Plutarco”, in Studi in onore di Aristide Colonna. Perugia, 283–299.Google Scholar
Valgiglio, E. (1987) “Ιστορία e βίος in Plutarco”, Orpheus 8: 50–70.Google Scholar
Valgiglio, E. (ed.) (1989) Plutarco: Il progresso nella virtù (CPM 3). Naples.Google Scholar
Valgiglio, E. (1991) “La struttura del De audiendis poetis di Plutarco”, in D’Ippolito and Gallo (1991), 375–380.Google Scholar
Valgiglio, E. (1992) “Dagli ‘Ethicà’ ai ‘Bioi’ in Plutarco”, ANRW II.33.6, 3963–4051.Google Scholar
Vallozza, M. (1990) “Alcuni motivi del discorso di lode tra Pindaro e Isocrate”, QUCC 35: 43–58.Google Scholar
Vallozza, M. (1991) “Osservazioni sulle techniche argomentative nel discorso di lode nel De laude ipsius di Plutarco”, in D’Ippolito, and Gallo (1991), 327–334.Google Scholar
Vamvouri Ruffy, M. (2011) “Symposium, physical and social health in Plutarch’s Table Talk”, in Klotz and Oikonomopoulou (2011a), 131–157.Google Scholar
Vamvouri Ruffy, M. (2012) Les vertus thérapeutiques du banquet: médecine et idéologie dans les Propos de Table de Plutarque. Paris.Google Scholar
Van der Stockt, L. (1987) “Plutarch’s use of literature: sources and citations in the Quaestiones Romanae”, AncSoc 18: 281–292.Google Scholar
van der Stockt, L. (1990) “Plutarch on language”, in Swiggers, P. and Wouters, A. (eds.), Le langage dans l’Antiquité. Leuven, 180–196.Google Scholar
van der Stockt, L. (1992) Twinkling and Twilight: Plutarch’s Reflections on Literature. Brussels.Google Scholar
van der Stockt, L. (ed.) (1996) Plutarchea Lovaniensia: A Miscellany of Essays on Plutarch. Leuven.Google Scholar
van der Stockt, L. (1999a) “Plutarch on mania and its therapy”, in Montes Cala et al. (1999), 517–526.Google Scholar
van der Stockt, L. (1999b) “A Plutarchan hypomnema on self-love”, AJPh 120: 575–599.Google Scholar
van der Stockt, L. (1999c) “Three Aristotles equal but one Plato: on a cluster of quotations in Plutarch”, in Pérez Jiménez, García López, and Aguilar, (1999), 127–140.Google Scholar
van der Stockt, L. (2000a) “Aspects of the ethics and poetics of the dialogue in the Corpus Plutarcheum”, in Gallo, and Moreschini, (2000), 93–116.Google Scholar
van der Stockt, L. (ed.) (2000b) Rhetorical Theory and Praxis in Plutarch: Acta of the IVth International Congress of the International Plutarch Society, Leuven, July 3–6, 1996. Louvain.Google Scholar
van der Stockt, L. (2002) “Καρπὸς ἐκ φιλίας ἡγεμονικῆς (Mor. 814 C): Plutarch’s observations on the ‘old-boy network’”, in Stadter and Van der Stockt (2002), 115–140.Google Scholar
van der Stockt, L. (2003–4) “Odysseus in Rome: on Plutarch’s introduction to De cohibenda ira”, Ploutarchos 1: 107–116.Google Scholar
van der Stockt, L. (2004) “Plutarch in Plutarch: the problem of the hypomnemata”, in Gallo, I. (ed.), La biblioteca di Plutarco. Naples, 331–340.Google Scholar
van der Stockt, L. (2005) “‘Excludens amator’: Agesilaus fending off a kiss”, in Pérez Jiménez and Titchener (2005), 441–450.Google Scholar
van der Stockt, L. (2007) “‘God does not love birds’ (De gen. Socr. 593A): theophilia in Plutarch”, in Nieto Ibáñez and López López (2007), 199–207.Google Scholar
van der Stockt, L. (2008) “Self-esteem and image-building: on anger in De cohibenda ira and in some Lives”, in Nikolaidis (2008), 285–295.Google Scholar
van der Stockt, L. (2011) “Semper duo, numquam tres? Plutarch’s Popularphilosophie on friendship and virtue in On having many friends”, in Roskam and Van der Stockt (2011), 19–39.Google Scholar
van der Stockt, L. (2013) “Loyalty divided or doubled? Plutarch’s Hellenism saluting Rome”, in Schubert, P. (ed.), Les grecs héritiers des romains. (Entretiens Hardt, LIX). Geneva, 15–43.Google Scholar
van der Stockt, L. (2014) “Compositional methods in the Lives”, in Beck (2014a), 321–332.Google Scholar
van Emde Boas, E., Rijksbaron, A., Huitink, L., and De Bakker, M. (2019) Cambridge Grammar of Classical Greek. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Van Hoof, L. (2007) “Strategic differences: Seneca and Plutarch on controlling anger”, Mnemosyne 60: 59–86.Google Scholar
van Hoof, L. (2008), “Genres and their implications: meddlesomeness in On curiosity versus the Lives”, in Nikolaidis (2008), 297–310.Google Scholar
van Hoof, L. (2010) Plutarch’s Practical Ethics: The Social Dynamics of Philosophy. Oxford.Google Scholar
van Hoof, L. (2014) “Practical ethics”, in Beck (2014a), 135–148.Google Scholar
Van Meirvenne, B. (2002) “Plutarch on the healing power of (a tricky) παρρησία: observations on a political reading of De adultatore et amico”, in Stadter and Van der Stockt (2002), 141–160.Google Scholar
van Nijf, O. (2011) “Public space and the political culture of Roman Termessos”, in Nijf, Van and Alston (2011), 215–242.Google Scholar
van Nijf, O. and Alston, R. (eds.) (2011) Political Culture in the Greek City after the Classical Age. Leuven.Google Scholar
van Wees, H. (1992) Status Warriors: War, Violence and Society in Homer and History. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Vasoli, C. (1972) “Bruni, Leonardo”, in Dizionario Biografico degli Italiani. Vol. XIV. Rome, 618–633.Google Scholar
Vaughan, A. and Vaughan, V. (1991) Caliban: A Cultural History. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Vela Tejada, J. (2019) “Atticism in Plutarch: a μίμησις τῶν ἀρχαίων or diglossia?”, Euphrosyne 47: 295–308.Google Scholar
Verdegem, S. (2008) “Plutarch’s Quaestiones Romanae and his Lives of Early Romans”, in Nikolaidis (2008), 171–185.Google Scholar
Verdegem, S. (2010a) Plutarch’s Life of Alcibiades: Story, Text and Moralism. Leuven.Google Scholar
Verdegem, S. (2010b) “Parallels and contrasts: Plutarch’s Comparison of Coriolanus and Alcibiades”, in Humble (2010b), 23–44.Google Scholar
Verger, J. (1997) “Guarino de Vérone”, in Nativel, C. (ed.), Centuriae Latinae: Cent une figures humanistes de la Renaissance aux Lumières offertes à Jacques Chomarat. Geneva, 409–415.Google Scholar
Vernière, Y. (1977) Symboles et mythes dans la pensée de Plutarque. Paris.Google Scholar
Vetta, M. (ed.) (1983) Poesia e simposio nella Grecia antica: guida storica e critica. Rome.Google Scholar
Veyne, P. (1976) Le pain et le cirque: Sociologie historique d’un pluralisme politique. Paris.Google Scholar
Veyne, P. (1978) “La famille et l’amour sous le haut-empire romain”, Annales 33: 35–63.Google Scholar
Veyne, P. (1985) “L’empire romain, I”, in Duby, G. and Ariès, P. (eds.), Histoire de la vie privée, I: De l’empire romain à l’an mil. Paris, 19–223.Google Scholar
Veyne, P. (1988) Did the Greeks Believe in Their Myths? Trans. P. Wissing. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Veyne, P. (1990) Bread and Circuses: Historical Sociology and Political Pluralism. Trans. B. Pearce. London.Google Scholar
Veyne, P. (1999) “L’identité grecque devant Rome et l’empereur”, REG 112: 511–567.Google Scholar
Veyne, P. (2005) L’Empire gréco-romain. Paris.Google Scholar
Vickers, B. (ed.) (1996) Francis Bacon: A Critical Edition of the Major Works. Oxford.Google Scholar
Viti, P. (ed.) (1996) Leonardo Bruni: Opere letterarie e politiche. Turin.Google Scholar
Vlassopoulos, K. (2013) Greeks and Barbarians. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Volpe Cacciatore, P. (ed.) (2009) Plutarco nelle traduzioni latine di età umanistica. Naples.Google Scholar
Volpe Cacciatore, P. (2017) “Gli animale e gli uomini in Plutarco”, in Morales, M. Sanz, González Delgado, R., Librán Moreno, M., and Ureña Bracero, J. (eds.), La (inter)textualidad en Plutarco. Cáceres, 383–389.Google Scholar
Volpe Cacciatore, P. and F. Ferrari (eds.) (2007) Plutarco e la cultura della sua età. Atti del X Convegno plutarcheo, Fisciano-Paestum, 27–29 ottobre 2005. Naples.Google Scholar
Voltaire, (1957) Oeuvres historiques, ed. Pomeau, R.. Paris.Google Scholar
von Arnim, H. (ed.) (1903) Stoicorum veterum fragmenta. Vol. I. Lepzig.Google Scholar
Waith, E. (1962) The Herculean Hero in Marlowe, Chapman, Shakespeare and Dryden. London.Google Scholar
Wälchli, P. (2003) Studien zu den literarischen Beziehungen zwischen Plutarch und Lukian. Munich.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1983) Suetonius: The Scholar and His Caesars. London.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (2008) Rome’s Cultural Revolution. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Walsh, J. (1992) “Syzygy, theme and history: a study in Plutarch’s Philopoemen and Flamininus”, Philologus 136: 208–233.Google Scholar
Walter, G. (ed.) (1951) Les Vies des hommes illustres. Traduction de Jacques Amyot. 2 vols. Paris. 2nd ed. 1977.Google Scholar
Walton, F. (1965) “A neglected historical text”, Historia 14: 236–251.Google Scholar
Wankel, H. (ed.) (1976) Demosthenes: Rede für Ktesiphon über den Kranz. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Wardman, A. (1955) “Plutarch and Alexander”, CQ 5: 96–107.Google Scholar
Wardman, A. (1971) “Plutarch’s methods in the Lives”, CQ 21: 254–261.Google Scholar
Wardman, A. (1974) Plutarch’s Lives. London.Google Scholar
Warren, J. (2002) Epicurus and Democritean Ethics: An Archaeology of Ataraxia. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Waterfield, R. and Stadter, P. (eds.) (1998) Greek Lives: A Selection of Nine Greek Lives. Oxford.Google Scholar
Waterfield, R. and Stadter, P. (1999) Roman Lives: A Selection of Eight Roman Lives. Oxford.Google Scholar
Webb, R. (2006) “Fiction, mimesis and the performance of the Greek past in the Second Sophistic”, in Konstan, and Saïd, (2006), 27–46.Google Scholar
Wecowski, M. (2014) The Rise of the Greek Aristocratic Banquet. Oxford.Google Scholar
Wegehaupt, H. (1914) “Planudes und Plutarch”, Philologus 27: 244–252.Google Scholar
Weidner, E. (1913) “Barbaros”, Glotta 4: 303–304.Google Scholar
Weiss, R. (1953) “Lo studio di Plutarco nel trecento”, PP 8: 321–342.Google Scholar
Weiss, R. (1977) Medieval and Humanist Greek: Collected Essays. Padua.Google Scholar
Weissenberger, B. (1894). Die Sprache Plutarchs von Chaironeia und die pseudoplutarchische Schriften. Straubing.Google Scholar
Weisser, S. (2016) “The art of quotation: Plutarch and Galen against Chryisippus”, in Weisser and Thaler (2016), 203–229.Google Scholar
Weisser, S. and Thaler, N. (eds.) (2016) Strategies of Philosophical Polemics in Greek and Roman Philosophy. Leiden.Google Scholar
Wendel, C. (1950) “Planudes, Maximos”, RE 20.2: 2202–2253.Google Scholar
Westerink, L. (ed.) (1948) Michael Psellus: De omnifaria doctrina. Utrecht.Google Scholar
Westerink, L. (ed.) (1973) Nicétas Magistros: Lettres d’un exilé (928–946). Paris.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (2000) “The politics and poetics of parasitism: Athenaeus on parasites and flatterers”, in Braund and Wilkins (2000), 304–315.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (2001) Greek Literature and the Roman Empire: The Politics of Imitation. Oxford.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (2002) “Alexander’s Hellenism and Plutarch’s textualism”, CQ 52: 174–192.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (2005) The Second Sophistic. Oxford.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (2006a) “Quickening the classics: the politics of prose in Roman Greece”, in Porter (2006a), 353–374.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (2006b) “‘This in-between book’: language, politics and genre in the Agricola”, in McGing and Mossman (2006a), 305–333.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (2006c) “The sincerest form of imitation: Plutarch on flattery”, in Konstan, and Saïd, (2006), 93–111.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (2009) “Greece and Rome”, in Boys-Stones, Graziosi, and Vasunia (2009), 114–128.Google Scholar
Whittaker, J. (1969) “Ammonius on the Delphic E”, CQ 63: 185–192.Google Scholar
Wiedemann, T. (1986) “Between men and beasts: barbarians in Ammianus Marcellinus,” in Moxon, Smart, and Woodman (1986), 189–201.Google Scholar
Wiedemann, T. (1988) Greek and Roman Slavery. London.Google Scholar
Wildberger, J. (2008) “Beast or god? The intermediate status of humans and the physical basis of the Stoic scala naturae”, in Alexandridis, Wild, and Winkler-Horaček (2008), 47–70.Google Scholar
Wilken, U. (1906) “Hellenen und Barbaren”, Neue Jahrbücher für das klassische Altertum 17: 457–471.Google Scholar
Wilkins, J. (2008) “Animals in the Romano-Greek culture of the second century AD”, in Alexandridis, Wild, and Winkler-Horaček (2008), 315–328.Google Scholar
Wilson, N. (1967) “The libraries of the Byzantine world”, GRBS 8: 53–80.Google Scholar
Wilson, N. (1970) “The church and classical studies in Byzantium”, A&A 16: 68–77.Google Scholar
Wilson, N. (1975) “Maximus Planudes and a famous codex of Plutarch”, GRBS 16: 95–97.Google Scholar
Wilson, N. (1992) From Byzantium to Italy: Greek Studies in the Italian Renaissance. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Wilson, N. (1996) Scholars of Byzantium. London. First published 1983.Google Scholar
Winkler, J. (1985) Auctor and Actor: A Narratological Reading of Apuleius’ Golden Ass. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Wirszubski, C. (1950) Libertas as a Political Idea at Rome during the Late Republic and Early Principate. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Witt, R. (1976) “Toward a biography of Coluccio Salutati”, Rinascimento 16: 19–34.Google Scholar
Witt, R. (1978) “Salutati and Plutarch,” in S. Bertelli and G. Ramakus (eds.), Essays Presented to Myron P. Gilmore: Vol. I. Florence, 335–346.Google Scholar
Witt, R. (1983) Hercules at the Crossroads: The Life, Works and Thought of Coluccio Salutati. Durham, NC.Google Scholar
Witt, R. (1996) “Introduction: Hans Baron’s renaissance humanism” and “The crisis after forty years”, The American Historical Review 101: 107–118.Google Scholar
Witt, R. (1999) “Hans Baron”, in Grendler, P. (ed.), Encyclopedia of the Renaissance: Vol. V. New York, 299–300.Google Scholar
Witt, R. (2000) In the Footsteps of the Ancients: The Origins of Humanism from Lovato to Bruni. Leiden.Google Scholar
Wofford, S. (1997) “Antony’s Egyptian Bacchanals: heroic and divine impersonation in Shakespeare’s Plutarch and Antony and Cleopatra”, in McGrail (1997), 33–67.Google Scholar
Wohl, V. (1997) “Scenes from a marriage: love and logos in Plutarch’s Conjugalia Praecepta”, Helios 24: 170–192.Google Scholar
Woolf, G. (1993) “Roman peace”, in Rich and Shipley (1993), 171–194.Google Scholar
Worth, V. (1986) “Les Fortunes de Jacques Amyot en Angleterre”, in Balard (1986), 285–296.Google Scholar
Wyttenbach, D. (1843) Lexicon Plutarcheum et Vitas et Moralia complectens. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Xenophontos, S. (2012) “Comedy in Plutarch’s Parallel Lives”, GRBS 52: 603–631.Google Scholar
Xenophontos, S. (2013) “Imagery and education in Plutarch”, CPh 108: 126–138.Google Scholar
Xenophontos, S. (2014a) “Resorting to rare sources of antiquity: Nikephoros Basilakes and the popularity of Plutarch’s Parallel Lives in twelfth-century Byzantium”, Parekbolai 4: 1–12.Google Scholar
Xenophontos, S. (2014b) Review of Beck (2014a), BMCR 2014.09.38.Google Scholar
Xenophontos, S. (2016) Ethical Education in Plutarch: Moralising Agents and Contexts. Berlin.Google Scholar
Xenophontos, S. (2018) “The Byzantine Plutarch: self-identity and model in Theodore Metochites’ Essay 71 of the Semeioseis gnomikai”, in North and Mack (2018), 23–39.Google Scholar
Xenophontos, S. (2019) “Plutarch and Theodore Metochites”, in Xenophontos and Oikonomopoulou (2019), 310–323.Google Scholar
Xenophontos, S. and Oikonomopoulou, K. (eds.) (2019) Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Plutarch. Leiden.Google Scholar
Yaginuma, S. (1992) “Plutarch’s language and style”, ANRW II. 33.6, 4726–4742.Google Scholar
Yunis, H. (2003) “Writing for reading: Thucydides, Plato and the emergence of the critical reader”, in Yunis, H. (ed.), Written Texts and the Rise of Literate Culture in Ancient Greece. Cambridge, 189–212.Google Scholar
Zadorojnyi, A. (1997a) “Tragedy and epic in Plutarch’s Crassus”, Hermes 125: 169–182.Google Scholar
Zadorojnyi, A. (1997b) “The Roman poets in Plutarch’s stories”, in Schrader, Ramón, and Vela (1997), 497–506.Google Scholar
Zadorojnyi, A. (2002) “Safe drugs for the good boys: Platonism and pedagogy in Plutarch’s De audiendis poetis”, in Stadter and Van der Stockt (2002), 297–314.Google Scholar
Zadorojnyi, A. (2006a) “King of his castle: Plutarch, Demosthenes 1–2”, CCJ 52: 102–127.Google Scholar
Zadorojnyi, A. (2006b) “Plutarch’s Themistocles and the poets”, AJPh 127: 261–292.Google Scholar
Zadorojnyi, A. (2007) “Cato’s suicide in Plutarch”, CQ 57: 216–230.Google Scholar
Zadorojnyi, A. (2010) “ὥσπερ ἐν ἐσόπτρῳ: The rhetoric and philosophy of Plutarch’s mirrors”, in Humble (2010b), 169–195.Google Scholar
Zadorojnyi, A. (2011) “The ethico-politics of writing in Plutarch’s Life of Dion”, JHS 131: 147–163.Google Scholar
Zadorojnyi, A. (2012) “Mimesis and the (plu)past in Plutarch’s Lives”, in Grethlein, J. and Krebs, C. (eds.), Time and Narrative in Ancient Historiography: The “Plupast” from Herodotus to Appian. Cambridge, 175–198.Google Scholar
Zadorojnyi, A. (2014) “Kratein onomatôn: language and value in Plutarch”, in Beck (2014a), 304–320.Google Scholar
Zadorojnyi, A. (2018a) “Plutarch à la Russe: ancient heroism and Russian ideology in Tolstoy’s War and Peace”, in North and Mack (2018), 149–178.Google Scholar
Zadorojnyi, A. (2018b) “Plutarch’s heroes and the ‘biographical synecdoche’”, in F. Cairns and T. Luke (eds.), Ancient Biography: Identity through Lives. Tallahassee, FL, 241–259.Google Scholar
Zadorojnyi, A. (2019) “Heroism, apophthegms, and the Plutarchan hypotext in Tolstoy’s War and Peace”, in Tilg, S. and Novokhatko, A. (eds.), Antikes Heldentum in der Moderne: Konzepte, Praktiken, Medien. Freiburg, 17–34.Google Scholar
Zadorojnyi, A. (2020) “Greek and Latin biography”, updated version, in R. Scodel (ed.), Oxford Bibliographies Online (Classics) (https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/page/classics).Google Scholar
Zanker, P. (1988) The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Zeller, E. (1868) Die Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung (Dritter Theil, Zweite Abtheilung, Die nacharistotelische Philosophie, zweite Hälfte). Leipzig.Google Scholar
Ziegler, K. (1949) Plutarchos von Chaironeia. (Separatdruck RE XXI.1). Stuttgart. Reprinted as Ziegler (1951).Google Scholar
Ziegler, K. (1951) “Plutarchos von Chaironeia”, RE XXI.1: 636–962.Google Scholar
Ziegler, K. (1964) Plutarchos von Chaironeia. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Zuiderhoek, A. (2008) “On the political sociology of the imperial Greek city”, GRBS 48: 417–445.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×