Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 6 - Religious Populism and Its Opponents

  • Magdalena Waligórska, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
  • Book:
    Cross Purposes
    Published online:
    08 December 2022
    Print publication:
    22 December 2022, pp 243-301

  • Summary

    The rise of right-wing populism, which followed the 2010 Smolensk catastrophe and laid the groundwork for the country’s recent shift towards illiberal democracy, coincided with a surge in the use of religious imagery. Catholic symbols thus came to dominate mainstream expressions of national pride and belonging. The conflict around the so-called “Smolensk cross” planted in front of the Presidential Palace in Warsaw and for six months fiercely defended by a group of the late President Kaczyński’s supporters provides an entry point to investigate the populist instrumentalization of Catholic symbols. The Smolensk cross defenders, protesting against the new, democratically elected, liberal president, Bronisław Komorowski, harnessed the symbol to frame an essentially partisan conflict in terms of a Manichean fight between good and evil. At the same time, pro-secularists, who opposed the presence of the cross at the seat of the country’s executive power, subversively hijacked the symbol to unsettle and provoke, enabling a carnivalesque “rite of reversal.”