Depression of metabolic rate has been recorded for virtually all major animal phyla in response to
environmental stress. The extent of depression is usually measured as the ratio of the depressed metabolic rate
to the normal resting metabolic rate. Metabolic rate is sometimes only depressed to approx. 80% of the
resting value (i.e. a depression of approx. 20% of resting); it is more commonly 5–40% of resting (i.e. a
depression of approx. 60–95% of resting); extreme depression is to 1% or less of resting, or even to an
unmeasurably low metabolic rate (i.e. a depression of approx. 99–100% of resting). We have examined the
resting and depressed metabolic rate of animals as a function of their body mass, corrected to a common
temperature. This allometric approach allows ready comparison of the absolute level of both resting and
depressed metabolic rate for various animals, and suggests three general patterns of metabolic depression.
Firstly, metabolic depression to approx. 0.05–0.4 of rest is a common and remarkably consistent pattern
for various non-cryptobiotic animals (e.g. molluscs, earthworms, crustaceans, fishes, amphibians, reptiles).
This extent of metabolic depression is typical for dormant animals with ‘intrinsic’ depression, i.e. reduction
of metabolic rate in anticipation of adverse environmental conditions but without substantial changes to
their ionic or osmotic status, or state of body water. Some of these types of animal are able to survive anoxia
for limited periods, and their anaerobic metabolic depression is also to approx. 0.05–0.4 of resting. Metabolic
depression to much less than 0.2 of resting is apparent for some ‘resting’, ‘over-wintering’ or diapaused
eggs of these animals, but this can be due to early developmental arrest so that the egg has a low ‘metabolic
mass’ of developed tissue (compared to the overall mass of the egg) with no metabolic depression, rather than
having metabolic depression of the entire cell mass. A profound decrease in metabolic rate occurs in
hibernating (or aestivating) mammals and birds during torpor, e.g. to less than 0.01 of pre-torpor metabolic
rate, but there is often no intrinsic metabolic depression in addition to that reduction in metabolic rate due
to readjustment of thermoregulatory control and a decrease in body temperature with a concommitant Q10
effect. There may be a modest intrinsic metabolic depression for some species in shallow torpor (to approx.
0.86) and a more substantial metabolic depression for deep torpor (approx. 0.6), but any energy saving
accruing from this intrinsic depression is small compared to the substantial savings accrued from the
readjustment of thermoregulation and the Q10 effect.
Secondly, a more extreme pattern of metabolic depression (to <0.05 of rest) is evident for cryptobiotic
animals. For these animals there is a profound change in their internal environment – for anoxybiotic
animals there is an absence of oxygen and for osmobiotic, anhydrobiotic or cryobiotic animals there is an
alteration of the ionic/osmotic balance or state of body water. Some normally aerobic animals can tolerate
anoxia for considerable periods, and their duration of tolerance is inversely related to their magnitude of
metabolic depression; anaerobic metabolic rate can be less than 0.005 of resting. The metabolic rate of
anhydrobiotic animals is often so low as to be unmeasurable, if not zero. Thus, anhydrobiosis is the ultimate
strategy for eggs or other stages of the life cycle to survive extended periods of environmental stress.
Thirdly, a pattern of absence of metabolism when normally hydrated (as opposed to anhydrobiotic or
cryobiotic) is apparently unique to diapaused eggs of the brine-shrimp (Artemia spp., an anostracan
crustacean) during anoxia. The apparent complete metabolic depression of anoxic yet hydrated cysts (and
extreme metabolic depression of normoxic, hypoxic, or osmobiotic, yet hydrated cysts), is an obvious
exception to the above patterns.
In searching for biochemical mechanisms for metabolic depression, it is clear that there are five general
characteristics at the molecular level of cells which have a depressed metabolism; a decrease in pH, the
presence of latent mRNA, a change in protein phosphorylation state, the maintenance of one
particular energy-utilizing process (ion pumping), and the down-regulation of another (protein synthesis).
Oxygen sensing is now the focus of intense investigation and obviously plays an important role in many
aspects of cell biology. Recent studies show that oxygen sensing is involved in metabolic depression and
research is now being directed towards characterising the proteins and mechanisms that comprise this
response. As more data accumulate, oxygen sensing as a mechanism will probably become the sixth general
characteristic of depressed cells.
The majority of studies on these general characteristics of metabolically depressed cells come from
members of the most common group of animals that depress metabolism, those non-cryptobiotic animals that
remain hydrated and depress to 0.05–0.4 of rest. These biochemical investigations are becoming more
molecular and sophisticated, and directed towards defined processes, but as yet no complete mechanism has
been delineated. The consistency of the molecular data within this group of animals suggests similar
metabolic strategies and mechanisms associated with metabolic depression.
The biochemical ‘adaptations’ of anhydrobiotic organisms would seem to be related more to surviving the
dramatic reduction in cell water content and its physico-chemical state, than to molecular mechanisms for
lowering metabolic rate. Metabolic depression would seem to be an almost inevitable consequence of their
altered hydration state.
The unique case of profound metabolic depression of hydrated Artemia spp. cysts under a variety of
conditions could reflect unique mechanisms at the molecular level. However, the available data are not
consistent with this possibility (with the exception of a uniquely large decrease in ATP concentration of
depressed, hydrated Artemia spp. cysts) and the question remains: how do cells of anoxic and hydrated
Artemia spp. differ from anoxic goldfish or turtle cells, enabling them so much more completely to depress
their metabolism?