Focal Article
Supporting robust, rigorous, and reliable reviewing as the cornerstone of our profession: Introducing a competency framework for peer review
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 04 February 2020, pp. 1-27
-
- Article
- Export citation
Commentaries
Using results-blind reviewing to support the peer review competency framework
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 01 May 2020, pp. 28-31
-
- Article
- Export citation
An empirical exploration of reviewers’ and editors’ roles fostering high quality research during peer review
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 01 May 2020, pp. 32-36
-
- Article
- Export citation
Reviewing is its own reward … but should it be? Incentivizing peer review
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 01 May 2020, pp. 37-40
-
- Article
- Export citation
Lack of expertise means it is not a peer review
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 01 May 2020, pp. 41-44
-
- Article
- Export citation
Should you sign your reviews? Open peer review and review quality
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 01 May 2020, pp. 45-47
-
- Article
- Export citation
Peer review and role conflict
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 01 May 2020, pp. 48-50
-
- Article
- Export citation
Bringing the review process into the 21st century: Post-publication peer review
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 01 May 2020, pp. 51-53
-
- Article
- Export citation
In our English-only research world, there is a need for reviewers who are tolerant of imperfect texts from non-anglophone authors
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 01 May 2020, pp. 54-56
-
- Article
- Export citation
Context matters: Developing peer reviewers to advance science and practice
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 01 May 2020, pp. 57-60
-
- Article
- Export citation
Quality standards and training are important in the peer review process, but what about engagement?
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 01 May 2020, pp. 61-63
-
- Article
- Export citation
About competencies and situations: A trait-activation approach to the competency framework for peer review
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 01 May 2020, pp. 64-67
-
- Article
- Export citation
Split roles in peer reviewing
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 01 May 2020, pp. 68-71
-
- Article
- Export citation
Navigating the review process through the holier than thou
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 01 May 2020, pp. 72-75
-
- Article
- Export citation
Methodological checklists for improving research quality and reporting consistency
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 01 May 2020, pp. 76-83
-
- Article
- Export citation
Recommendation: Add a competency on diversity and inclusion
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 01 May 2020, pp. 84-89
-
- Article
- Export citation
Practice Forum
Leadership concepts in manufacturing environments: A brief historical review and conclusion with recommendations for education and training of I-O psychologists
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 01 May 2020, pp. 90-102
-
- Article
- Export citation
Is the future of leadership development wearable? Exploring self-tracking in leadership programs
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 01 May 2020, pp. 103-116
-
- Article
- Export citation
Front Cover (OFC, IFC) and matter
IOP volume 13 issue 1 Cover and Front matter
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 01 May 2020, pp. f1-f4
-
- Article
-
- You have access
- Export citation
Back Cover (IBC, OBC) and matter
IOP volume 13 issue 1 Cover and Back matter
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 01 May 2020, pp. b1-b2
-
- Article
-
- You have access
- Export citation