Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-28T01:57:14.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2025

Jakob Norberg
Jakob Norberg
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Type
Chapter
Information
Schopenhauer's Politics , pp. 256 - 272
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/

References

App, Urs. “Schopenhauer and the Orient.” In The Oxford Handbook of Schopenhauer. Ed. Wicks, Robert. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. 88–107.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. Origins of Totalitarianism. San Diego: Harcourt Brace, 1966.Google Scholar
Asmis, Elizabeth, Bartsch, Shadi, and Nussbaum, Martha. “Seneca and His World.” In Lucius Annaeus Seneca: The Complete Tragedies, vol. 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017. vii–xxix.Google Scholar
Atwell, John. Schopenhauer on the Character of the World: The Metaphysics of Will. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auweele, Dennis Vanden. The Kantian Foundations of Schopenhauer’s Pessimism. New York: Routledge, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balibar, Etienne. The Philosophy of Marx. Trans. Turner, Chris. London: Verso, 1995.Google Scholar
Bamford, Paul. Fighting Ships and Prisons: The Mediterranean Galleys of France in the Age of Louis XIV. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick. After Hegel: German Philosophy 1840–1900. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick. David Friedrich Strauß, Father of Unbelief: An Intellectual Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiser, Frederick. Weltschmerz: Pessimism in German Philosophy, 1860–1900. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bejan, Teresa. Mere Civility: Disagreement and the Limits of Toleration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Berdahl, Robert. The Politics of the Prussian Nobility: The Development of a Conservative Ideology 1770–1848. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergman, Ulrike. “Schopenhauer, Johanna.” In Neue Deutsche Biographe. 2007. www.deutsche-biographie.de/sfz79036.html#ndbcontent.Google Scholar
Bernstein, J. M. Adorno: Disenchantment and Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, Christopher. The Idea of Luxury: A Conceptual and Historical Investigation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biedrzynski, Effi. Goethes Weimar: Das Lexikon von Personen und Schauplätze. Munich: Artemis & Winkler, 2014.Google Scholar
Blumenberg, Hans. Höhlenausgänge. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1989.Google Scholar
Blumenberg, Hans. Die Lesbarkeit der Welt. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1981.Google Scholar
Borinski, Karl. Baltasar Gracian und die Hofliteratur in Deutschland. Halle an der Saale: Max Niemeyer, 1894.Google Scholar
Bowman, Shearer Davis. Masters & Lords: Mid-19th-Century U.S. Planters and Prussian Junkers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, Nicholas. German Literature: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, Helmut. “Weimar: Wie die Deutschen zu ihrer literarischen Hauptstadt kamen.” In Stätten deutscher Literatur: Studien zur literarischen Zentrenbildung 1750–1815. Ed. Stellmacher, Wolfgang. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1998. 351–91.Google Scholar
Brann, Henry Walter. “Schopenhauer and Spinoza.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 10.2 (1972): 181–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breckman, Warren. Marx, the Young Hegelians, and the Origins of Radical Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Breuilly, John. “Conclusion: Making Connections in Germany in the Long Nineteenth Century.” In Nineteenth-Century Germany: Politics, Culture, and Society, 1780–1918. Ed. Breuilly, John. London: Bloomsbury, 2020. 329–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
British and Foreign Anti-Slavery Society. Slavery and the internal slave trade in the United States of North America, being replies to questions transmitted by the Committee of the British and Foreign Anti-slavery Society for the abolition of slavery and the slave trade throughout the world. London: T. Ward, 1841.Google Scholar
Brobjer, Thomas. Nietzsche’s Philosophical Context: An Intellectual Biography. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooke, Christopher. Philosophic Pride: Stoicism in Political Thought from Lipsius to Rousseau. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Bruford, W. H. Culture and Society in Classical Weimar 1775–1806. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Buchholz, Paul. Private Anarchy: Impossible Community and the Outsider’s Monologue in German Experimental Fiction. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunia, Remigius, Dembeck, Till, and Stanitzek, Georg. “Elemente einer Literatur- und Kulturgeschichte des Philisters.” In Philister: Problemgeschichte einer Sozialfigur der neueren deutschen Literatur. Ed. Bunia, Remigius, Dembeck, Till, and Stanitzek, Georg. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2011. 13–51.Google Scholar
Buxton, Thomas Fowell. The African Slave Trade and Its Remedy. London: John Murray, 1840.Google Scholar
Cantarino, Elena. “Die Übersetzung von Graciáns Handorakel.” In Schopenhauer Handbuch: Leben – Werk – Wirkung, 2nd ed. Ed. Schubbe, Daniel and Koßler, Matthias. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler, 2018. 181–3.Google Scholar
Cartwright, David. “Arthur Schopenhauer (1788–1860).” In The Encyclopedia of Political Thought. Ed. Gibbon, Michael. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2015. 1–2.Google Scholar
Cartwright, David. Schopenhauer: A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, David. “Schopenhauer’s Narrower Sense of Morality.” In The Cambridge Companion to Schopenhauer. Ed. Janaway, Christopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. 252–92.Google Scholar
Case, Holly. The Age of Questions; or, A First Attempt at an Aggregate History of the Eastern, Social, Woman, American, Jewish, Polish, Bullion, Tuberculosis, and Many Other Questions over the Nineteenth Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Caygill, Howard. The Art of Judgement. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989.Google Scholar
Charette, Danielle. “David Hume and the Politics of Slavery.” Political Studies (2023). https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217231157516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Randall. “On the Acrimoniousness of Intellectual Disputes.” Common Knowledge 8.1 (2002): 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Randall. The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Dahlkvist, Tobias. “Judaskyssar: Om den biografiska läsarten hos Schopenhauers lärjungar och kritiker.” In Tysk idealism. Ed. Burman, Anders and Lettevall, Rebecka. Stockholm: Axl, 2014. 367–89.Google Scholar
Damm, Oskar. Schopenhauers Rechts- und Staatsphilosophie: Darstellung und Kritik. Halle am Saale: C. A. Kaemmerer, 1901.Google Scholar
Darwin, Richard. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex, 2nd ed. New York: Appleton, 1924.Google Scholar
Dewald, Jonathan. The European Nobility, 1400–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Dews, Peter. The Idea of Evil. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dienstag, Joshua Foa. Pessimism: Philosophy, Ethic, Spirit. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Dilthey, Wilhelm. Gesammelte Schriften, vol. 16. Ed. Herrmann, Ulrich. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1972.Google Scholar
Dorguth, Friedrich. Schopenhauer in seiner Wahrheit mit einem Anhange über das abstrakte Recht und die Dialektik des ethischen und des Rechtsbegriffs. Magdeburg: Heinrichshofen’sche Buchhandlung, 1845.Google Scholar
Drolet, Jean-François. Beyond Tragedy and Eternal Peace: Politics and International Relations in the Thought of Friedrich Nietzsche. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Echternkamp, Jörg. Der Aufstieg des deutschen Nationalismus (1770–1840). Frankfurt am Main: Campus, 1998.Google Scholar
Eckermann, Johann Peter. Conversations with Goethe in the Last Years of His Life. Trans. Blunden, Allan. London: Penguin Random House, 2022.Google Scholar
Elias, Norbert. The Civilizing Process: Sociogenetic and Psychogenetic Investigations, revised ed. Trans. Jephcott, Edmund. Oxford: Blackwell, 2000.Google Scholar
Engels, Friedrich. Anti-Dühring: Herr Eugen Dühring’s Revolution in Science. Trans. Burns, Emile. Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1977.Google Scholar
Eidelson, Benjamin. “The Etiquette of Equality.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 51.1 (2023): 97–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eiden-Offe, Patrick. Die Poesie der Klasse: Romantischer Antikapitalismus und die Erfindung der Proletariats. Berlin: Matthes & Seitz, 2017.Google Scholar
Emden, Christian J. “Nihilism, Pessimism, and the Conditions of Modernity.” In The Cambridge History of Modern European Thought, vol. 1. Ed. Breckman, Warren and Gordon, Peter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019. 372–97.Google Scholar
Elder, Robert. Calhoun: American Heretic. New York: Basic Books, 2021.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. Explaining Social Behavior: More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eßbach, Wolfgang. Die Junghegelianer: Soziologie einer Intellektuellengruppe. Munich: Wilhelm Fink, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faust, Drew Gilpin. The Creation of Confederate Nationalism: Ideology and Identity in the Civil War South. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Fawcett, Edmund. Conservatism: The Fight for a Tradition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Fellmann, Ferdinand. Philosophie der Lebenskunst. Hamburg: Junius Verlag, 2009.Google Scholar
Feuerbach, Ludwig. The Essence of Christianity. Trans. Eliot, George. New York: Harper & Brothers: 1957.Google Scholar
Feuerbach, Ludwig. “Die Philosophie des Rechts nach geschichtlicher Ansicht von Friedr. Jul. Stahl.” Jahrbücher für wissenschaftliche Kritik 9.2 (July 1835): 1–7 and 9–20.Google Scholar
Fichte, Immanuel Hermann. Die philosophischen Lehren von Recht, Staat und Sitte in Deutschland, Frankreich und England von der Mitte des achtzehnten Jahrhunderts bis zur Gegenwart. Vol. 1 of System der Ethik. Leipzig: Dyk’sche Buchhandlung, 1850.Google Scholar
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb. Addresses to the German Nation. Ed. and trans. Moore, Gregory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb. Beitrag zur Berichtigung der Urteile des Publikums über die französische Revolution. Ed. Schottky, Richard. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1973.Google Scholar
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb. Foundations of Natural Right According to the Principles of the Wissenschaftslehre. Ed. Neuhouser, Frederick. Trans. Baur, Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Fitzhugh, George. Sociology for the South, or The Failure of Free Society. Richmond: A. Morris, 1854.Google Scholar
Fohrmann, Jürgen. “Geschichte der deutschen Literaturgeschichtsschreibung zwischen Aufklärung und Kaiserreich.” In Wissenschaftsgeschichte der Germanistik im 19. Jahrhundert. Ed. Fohrmann, Jürgen and Voßkamp, Wilhelm. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler, 1994. 576–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fohrmann, Jürgen. “Weltgesellschaft und Nationalphilologie.” Merkur 67.7 (2013): 607–18.Google Scholar
Fohrmann, Jürgen. “‘Wir besprächen uns in bequemen Stunden …’ Zum Goethe – Schiller Verhältnis und seiner Rezeption im 19. Jahrhundert.” In Klassik im Vergleich: Normativität und Historizität europäischer Klassiken. Ed. Voßkamp, Wilhelm. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler, 1993. 570–93.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. The Hermeneutics of the Subject: Lectures at the Collège de France 1981–1982. Ed. Gros, Frédéric. Trans. Burchell, Graham. New York: Picador, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Joshua Isaac. “Schopenhauer on Boredom.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 30.3 (2022): 477–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, Benjamin. Autobiography, Poor Richard, and Later Writings. Ed. Leo Lemay, J. A.. New York: Library of America, 1987.Google Scholar
Frauenstädt, Julius. Briefe über die Schopenhauer’sche Philosophie. Leipzig: F. A. Brockhaus, 1854.Google Scholar
Frauenstädt, Julius. Memorabilien, Briefe und Nachlassstücke. Berlin: A. W. Hayn, 1863.Google Scholar
Frevert, Ute. “Honour and Middle-Class Culture: The History of the Duel in England and Germany.” In Bourgeois Society in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Ed. Kocka, Jürgen and Mitchell, Allen. Oxford: Berg, 1993. 207–40.Google Scholar
Frost, Laura. Johanna Schopenhauer: Ein Frauenleben aus der klassischen Zeit. Leipzig: Klinthardt & Biermann, 1913.Google Scholar
Gardner, Sebastian. “Post-Schopenhauerian Metaphysics: Hartmann, Mainländer, Bahnsen, and Nietzsche.” In The Oxford Handbook of Schopenhauer. Ed. Wicks, Robert. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. 455–78.Google Scholar
Gardner, Sebastian. “Schopenhauer (1799–1860).” In The Oxford Handbook of German Philosophy in the Nineteenth Century. Ed. Forster, Michael N. and Gjesdal, Kristin. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. 108–36.Google Scholar
Gardner, Sebastian. “Schopenhauer, Will, and the Unconscious.” In The Cambridge Companion to Schopenhauer. Ed. Janaway, Christopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. 375–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, Sebastian. “Schopenhauer’s Contraction of Reason: Clarifying Kant and Undoing German Idealism.” Kantian Review 17.3 (2012): 375–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, Sebastian. “Schopenhauer’s Metaphilosophy: How to Think a World without Reason.” In Schopenhauer’s Fourfold Root. Ed. Head, Jonathan and Vanden Auwelee, Dennis. London: Routledge, 2017. 11–31.Google Scholar
Gehlen, Arnold. Philosophische Anthropologie und Handlungslehre. Gesamtausgabe, vol. 4. Ed. Siegbert Rehberg, Karl. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1983.Google Scholar
Geitner, Ursula. “Betrachtungen des Philisters: 1800/1900/1924.” In Philister: Problemgeschichte einer Sozialfigur der neueren deutschen Literatur. Ed. Bunia, Remigius, Dembeck, Till, and Stanitzek, Georg. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2011. 121–41.Google Scholar
Genovese, Eugene D. The Slaveholder’s Dilemma: Freedom and Progress in Southern Conservative Thought, 1820–1860. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Andrew. Misanthropy. London: Bloomsbury, 2017.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Michael. Nihilism before Nietzsche. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von. Klassische Dramen: Iphigenie Auf Tauris, Egmont, Torquato Tasso. Ed. Borchmeyer, Dieter. Frankfurt am Main: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag, 2008.Google Scholar
Gooch, Todd. “Ludwig Andreas Feuerbach.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2020. Ed. Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/ludwig-feuerbach/.Google Scholar
Gottfried, Paul. “Pessimism and the Revolutions of 1848.” Review of Politics 35.2 (1973): 193–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gracián, Baltasar. The Pocket Oracle and the Art of Prudence. Trans. Robbins, Jeremy. London: Penguin, 2011.Google Scholar
Grimm, Dieter. “Bürgerlichkeit im Recht.” In Bürger und Bürgerlichkeit im 19. Jahrhundert. Ed. Kocka, Jürgen Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1987. 149–88.Google Scholar
Grimminger, Rolf. “Aufklärung, Absolutismus und bürgerliche Individuen. Über den notwendigen Zusammenhang von Literatur, Gesellschaft und Staat in der Geschichte des 18. Jahrhunderts.” In Hansers Sozialgeschichte der deutschen Literatur, vol. 3. Ed. Grimminger, Rolf. Munich: DTV Verlag, 1980. 15–99.Google Scholar
Gründer, Karlfried. “Die Bedeutung der Philosophie in der Bildung des deutschen Bürgertums im 19. Jahrhundert.” In Bildungsbürgertum im 19. Jahrhundert, vol. 2. Ed. Koselleck, Reinhart. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1990. 47–56.Google Scholar
Gutzkow, Karl. “Arthur Schopenhauer’s Lehre und Leben I.” Unterhaltungen am häuslichen Herd 3.2, no. 13 (1862): 252–5.Google Scholar
Gutzkow, Karl. “Arthur Schopenhauer’s Lehre und Leben II.” Unterhaltungen am häuslichen Herd 3.2, no. 14 (1862): 271–5.Google Scholar
Gutzkow, Karl. Rückblicke auf mein Leben. Berlin: Hofmann, 1875.Google Scholar
Gwinner, Wilhelm. Arthur Schopenhauer aus persönlichem Umgang dargestellt: ein Blick auf sein Leben, seinen Charakter und seine Lehre. Ed. Gwinner, Charlotte. Leipzig: F. A. Brockhaus, 1922.Google Scholar
Gwinner, Wilhelm. Schopenhauer und seine Freunde: Zur Beleuchtung der Frauenstädt-Lindner’schen Vertheidigung Schopenhauer’s sowie zur Ergänzung der Schrift “Arthur Schopenhauer aus persönlichem Umgange dargestellt.” Leipzig: F. A. Brockhaus, 1863.Google Scholar
Gwinner, Wilhelm. Schopenhauers Leben. Leipzig: F. A. Brockhaus, 1878.Google Scholar
Hacohen, Malachi. Karl Popper: The Formative Years, 1902–1945: Politics and Philosophy in Interwar Vienna. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Hagemann, Karen. “Mannlicher Muth und Teutsche Ehre”: Nation, Militär und Geschlecht zur Zeit der Antinapoleonischen Kriege Preußens. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh, 2000.Google Scholar
Haller, Karl Ludwig von. Restoration of Political Science, vol. 1. Trans. Vien, Jack. Perth: Imperium Press, 2023.Google Scholar
Hankins, James. Virtue Politics: Soulcraft and Statecraft in Renaissance Italy. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Haym, Rudolf. “Arthur Schopenhauer.” In Arthur Schopenhauer. Ed. Harich, Wolfgang. Berlin: Aufbau Verlag, 1955. 11–155.Google Scholar
Heartfield, James. The British and Foreign Anti-Slavery Society, 1838–1956: A History. London: Hurst, 2016.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts oder Naturrecht und Staatswissenschaft im Grundrisse. Werke, vol. 7. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1986.Google Scholar
Hertz, Martin. “Schulze, Johannes” Allgemeine Deutsche Biographie (1891): www.deutsche-biographie.de/pnd118860283.html#adbcontent.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism before Its Triumph. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. The Rhetoric of Reaction: Perversity, Futility, Jeopardy. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. Ed. Curley, Edwin. Cambridge: Hackett 1994.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. Man and Citizen (De Homine and De Cive). Ed. Gert, Bernard. Cambridge: Hackett, 1991.Google Scholar
Holborn, Hajo. “Der deutsche Idealismus in sozialgeschichtlicher Beleuchtung.” Historische Zeitschrift 174.2 (1952): 359–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horkheimer, Max. “Die Aktualität Schopenhauers.” Archiv für Philosophie 11.3–4 (1962): 207–22.Google Scholar
Houben, Heinrich H. Damals in Weimar: Erinnerungen und Briefe von und an Johanna Schopenhauer, 2nd ed. Berlin: Rembrandt Verlag, 1929.Google Scholar
Houben, Heinrich H. “Der Fall Gutzkow/Schopenhauer.” Süddeutsche Monatshefte 27 (1930): 468–96.Google Scholar
Hübscher, Arthur. Denker gegen den Strom. Schopenhauer: gestern – heute – morgen. Bonn: Bouvier Verlag Herbert Grundmann, 1973.Google Scholar
Ingenkamp, Heinz-Gerd. “Dreimal keine Höflichkeit (1. Teil): Eine Kunstfertigkeit des Verhaltens bei Schopenhauer, im Christentum und in der Antike.” Schopenhauer Jahrbuch 69 (1988): 349–60.Google Scholar
Israel, Jonathan. The Enlightenment That Failed: Ideas, Revolution, and Democratic Defeat, 1748–1830. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Janaway, Christopher. “Introduction.” In The Cambridge Companion to Schopenhauer. Ed. Janaway, Christopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janaway, Christopher. “Introduction.” In The World as Will and Representation: Volume I. Ed. and trans. Norman, Judith, Welchman, Alistair, and Janaway, Christopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. xii–xlvi.Google Scholar
Janaway, Christopher. “Schopenhauer, Europe, and Eurocentrism.” In The Schopenhaurian Mind. Ed. Bather Woods, David and Stoll, Timothy. London: Routledge, 2023. 342–56.Google Scholar
Janaway, Christopher. “Schopenhauer’s Philosophy of Value.” In Better Consciousness: Schopenhauer’s Philosophy of Value. Ed. Neill, Alex and Janaway, Christopher. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009. 1–10.Google Scholar
Jansen, Christian. “Der deutsche Nationalismus im Vormärz.” In Vormärz-Handbuch. Ed. Otto Eke, Norbert. Bielefeld: Aisthesis Verlag, 2020. 195–203.Google Scholar
Jensen, Anthony. “Schopenhauer’s Philosophy of History.” History and Theory, 57.3 (2018): 349–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeske, Michael. “Ludwig Feuerbach.” In Schopenhauer Handbuch: Leben – Werk – Wirkung, 2nd ed. Ed. Schubbe, Daniel and Koßler, Matthias. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler, 2018. 264–70.Google Scholar
Johnson, Samuel. Taxation No Tyranny; An Answer to the Resolutions and Address of the American Congress. London: Printed for T. Cadell, 1775.Google Scholar
Jordan, Neil. “Schopenhauer’s Politics: Ethics, Jurisprudence, and the State.” In Better Consciousness: Schopenhauer’s Philosophy of Value. Ed. Neill, Alex and Janaway, Christopher. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009. 171–88.Google Scholar
Kang, Taran. “Escape from Samsara: Schopenhauer’s Opposition to the Philosophy of History.” European Legacy 26.5 (2021): 484–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A German-English Edition. Ed. Timmerman, Jens. Trans. Gregor, Mary, revised by Timmerman, Jens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Werkausgabe, vol. 9. Ed. Weischedel, Wilhelm. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1968.Google Scholar
Kautsky, Karl. “Arthur Schopenhauer.” In Arthur Schopenhauer. Ed. Harich, Wolfgang. Berlin: Aufbau Verlag, 1955. 156–201.Google Scholar
Kedourie, Elie. Nationalism. New York: Frederick A. Praeger, 1960.Google Scholar
Kelly, Alfred. The Descent of Darwin: The Popularization of Darwinism in Germany, 1860–1914. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Kidd, Ian James. “Philosophical Misanthropy.” Philosophy Now (2017). https://philosophynow.org/issues/139/Philosophical_Misanthropy.Google Scholar
Koch, Rainer. “Stadtverfassung und Stadtentwicklung Frankfurts 1815–1850.” In Zur Geschichte und Problematik der Nationalphilologien in Europa. 150 Jahre Erste Germanistenversammlung von 1846. Ed. Fürbeth, Frank. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, 1999. 41–50.Google Scholar
Kocka, Jürgen. Der Kampf um die Moderne: Das lange 19. Jahrhundert in Deutschland. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 2021.Google Scholar
Köhler, Astrid. “Johanna Schopenhauer in London, Berlin und Weimar.” In Berlins 19. Jahrhundert: Ein Metropolen-Kompendium. Ed. Berbig, Roland, D’Aprile, Iwan-M., Peitsch, Helmut, and Schütz, Erhard. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2011. 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kondylis, Panajotis. Konservatismus: Geschichtlicher Gehalt und Untergang. Stuttgart: Ernst Klett, 1986.Google Scholar
Korff, H. A. Geist der Goethezeit: Versuch einer ideellen Entwicklung der klassisch-romantischen Literaturgeschichte, vol. 4. Leipzig: Koehler & Amelang, 1956.Google Scholar
Kraus, Hans-Christof. “Stahl, Friedrich Julius.” In Neue Deutsche Biographie, 2013. www.deutsche-biographie.de/pnd118616641.html#ndbcontent.Google Scholar
Krauss, Werner. Graciáns Lebenslehre. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1947.Google Scholar
Kühnl, Reinhard. “Die großen Fragen der Epoche und die Antwort Schopenhauers.” In Schopenhauer im Denken der Gegenwart: 23 Beiträge zu seiner Aktualität. Ed. Sperling, Volker. Munich: Piper, 1987. 197–216.Google Scholar
La Vopa, Anthony. Fichte: The Self and the Calling of Philosophy, 1762–1799. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Ladd, B. A. “Schopenhauer and America.” Viertes Jahrbuch der Schopenhauer-Gesellschaft (1915): 90–6.Google Scholar
Lauster, Martina. “Karl Gutzkow (1811–1878).” In Vormärz-Handbuch. Ed. Otto Eke, Norbert. Bielefeld: Aisthesis, 2020. 776–82.Google Scholar
Lepsius, Rainer. “Zur Soziologie des Bürgertums und der Bürgerlichkeit.” In Bürger und Bürgerlichkeit im 19. Jahrhundert. Ed. Kocka, Jürgen. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1987. 79–100.Google Scholar
Levy, Jacob. The Multiculturalism of Fear. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Peter. Arthur Schopenhauer. London: Reaktion Books, 2012.Google Scholar
Lindner, Otto. Arthur Schopenhauer. Von ihm. Über ihn: Ein Wort der Vertheidigung. Berlin: A. W. Hayn, 1863.Google Scholar
Lincoln, Abraham. Collected Works, vol. 2. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Linke, Angela. Sprachkultur und Bürgertum: Zur Mentalitätsgeschichte des 19. Jahrhunderts. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linstrum, Erik. “Strauss’s ‘Life of Jesus’: Publication and the Politics of the German Public Sphere.” Journal of the History of Ideas 71.4 (2010): 593–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Literature.” Economist, April 9, 1853, no. 502. 399–400.Google Scholar
Losurdo, Domenico. Liberalism: A Counter-History. Trans. Elliott, Gregory. London: Verso, 2011.Google Scholar
Löwith, Karl. Von Hegel zu Nietzsche: Der revolutionäre Bruch im Denken des 19. Jahrhunderts. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1995.Google Scholar
Lübbe, Hermann. Politische Philosophie in Deutschland: Studien zu ihrer Geschichte. Basel: Benno Schwabe, 1963.Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg. “Arthur Schopenhauer.” In Arthur Schopenhauer. Ed. Harich, Wolfgang. Berlin: Aufbau Verlag, 1955. 206–64.Google Scholar
Lukas, Wolfgang, and Schneider, Ute. “Einleitung: Karl Gutzkow – Wandlungen des Buchmarkts im 19. Jahrhundert und die Pluralisierung der Autorenrolle.” In Karl Gutzkow (1811–1878): Publizistik, Literatur und Buchmarkt zwischen Vormärz und Gründerzeit. Ed. Lukas, Wolfgang and Schneider, Ute. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2013. 7–19.Google Scholar
Lupenitz, Deborah. Schopenhauer’s Porcupines: Intimacy and Its Dilemmas. New York: Basic Books, 2003.Google Scholar
Lütkehaus, Ludger. Schopenhauer: Metaphysischer Pessimismus und “soziale Frage.” Bonn: Bouvier Verlag Herbert Grundmann, 1980.Google Scholar
MacLeod, Catriona. “Cutting up the Salon: Adele Schopenhauer’s ‘Zwergenhochzeit’ and Goethe’s Hochzeitlied.” Deutsche Vierteljahresschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte 89.1 (2015): 70–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macpherson, C. B. The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke. Reprint ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Mainländer, Philipp. Die Philosophie der Erlösung. Berlin: Theobald Grieben, 1876.Google Scholar
Mann, Golo. Deutsche Geschichte des 19. und 20. Jahrhunderts. Munich: S. Fischer, 1992.Google Scholar
Marcin, Raymond. “Schopenhauer on Law and Justice.” In The Oxford Handbook of Schopenhauer. Ed. Wicks, Robert. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. 311–27.Google Scholar
Martus, Steffen. Aufklärung: Das deutsche 18. Jahrhundert – Ein Epochenbild. Berlin: Rowohlt, 2015.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. “Zur Judenfrage.” Deutsch-Französische Jahrbücher 1.1–2 (1844): 182–214.Google Scholar
Matala de Mazza, Ethel. “Romantic Politics and Society.” Trans. Ng, Julia and Ladislaus, Löb. In The Cambridge Companion to German Romanticism. Ed. Saul, Nicholas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. 191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maurer, Doris. Das literarische Weimar – Das literarische Bonn: Acht Porträts maßgeblicher Frauen. Bonn: Bonner Verlags-Comptoir, 2019.Google Scholar
Maus, Heinz. “Die Traumhölle des Justemilieu.” In Schopenhauer und Marx: Philosophie des Elends – Elend der Philosophie? Ed. Ebeling, Hans and Lütkehaus, Ludger. Frankfurt am Main: Syndikat, 1985. 43–59.Google Scholar
Mayfield, Daniel Scott. Artful Immorality – Variants of Cynicism: Machiavelli, Gracián, Diderot, Nietzsche. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClelland, Charles. State, Society, and University in Germany 1700–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
McNicholl, Rachel, and Wilhelms, Kerstin. “Romane von Frauen.” In Zwischen Revolution und Restauration 1815–1848: Hansers Sozialgeschichte der deutschen Literatur, vol. 5. Ed. Sautermeister, Gert and Schmid, Ulrich. Munich: DTV, 1998. 210–33.Google Scholar
Melamed, Yitzhak Y. “Schopenhauer on Spinoza: Animals, Jews, and Evil.” In The Schopenhauerian Mind. Ed. Woods, David Bather and Stoller, Timothy. London: Routledge, 2023. 390–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merquior, José Guilherme. Liberalism, Old and New. Woodbridge, CT: Twayne, 1991.Google Scholar
Miller, David. “The Ethical Significance of Nationality.” Ethics 98.4 (1988): 647–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moggach, Douglas. “Bruno Bauer.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2022. Ed. Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2022/entries/bauer/.Google Scholar
Moggach, Douglas. The Philosophy and Politics of Bruno Bauer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moledo, Fernando. “Kant über Klugheit, Sittlichkeit und Glückseligkeitslehre.” Studia Kantiana 17.1 (2019): 71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Edmund. American Slavery, American Freedom. New York: W. W. Norton, 1975.Google Scholar
Morrow, John. “Romanticism and Political Thought in the Early Nineteenth Century.” In Nineteenth-Century Political Thought. Ed. Jones, Gareth Stedman and Claeys, Gregory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. 39–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Münkler, Herfried. “Das Dilemma des deutschen Bürgertums: Recht, Staat und Eigentum in der Philosophie Arthur Schopenhauers.” ARSP: Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 67.3 (1981): 379–96.Google Scholar
Münkler, Herfried. Marx, Wagner, Nietzsche: Welt im Umbruch. Berlin: Rowohlt, 2021.Google Scholar
Neeley, Steven. “The Consistency of Schopenhauer’s Metaphysics.” In A Companion to Schopenhauer. Ed. Vandenabeele, Bart. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2016. 105–19.Google Scholar
Neidert, Rudolf. Die Rechtsphilosophie Schopenhauers und ihr Schweigen zum Widerstandsrecht. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1966.Google Scholar
Neuhouser, Frederick “The Idea of a Hegelian ‘Science’ of Society.” In A Companion to Hegel. Ed. Houlgate, Stephen and Baur, Michael. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011. 281–96.Google Scholar
Neymeyr, Barbara. “Das ‘Labyrinth des Lebens’ im Spiegel der Literatur: Zur exemplarischen Funktion der Faust-Tragödie und anderer Werke in Schopenhauers Ästhetik und Willensmetaphysik.” In Schopenhauer und Goethe: Biographische und philosophische Perspektiven. Ed. Schubbe, Daniel und Fauth, Søren. Hamburg: Meiner, 2016. 299–335.Google Scholar
Nicholls, Moira. “The Influences of Eastern Thought on Schopenhauer’s Doctrine of the Thing-in-Itself.” In The Cambridge Companion to Schopenhauer. Ed. Janaway, Christopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. 171–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. Jenseits von Gut und Böse. Kritische Studienausgabe, vol. 5. Ed. Colli, Giorgio and Montinari, Mazzino. Munich: DTV, 1999.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. Unzeitgemäße Betrachtungen III: Schopenhauer als Erzieher. Kritische Studienausgabe, vol. 1. Ed. Colli, Giorgio and Montinari, Mazzino. Munich: DTV, 1999.Google Scholar
Nipperdey, Thomas. Deutsche Geschichte 1800–1866: Bürgerwelt und starker Staat. Munich: C. H. Beck, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norberg, Jakob. The Brothers Grimm and the Making of German Nationalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novalis, . “Glauben und Liebe.” In Schriften: Die Werke Friedrich von Hardenbergs, vol. 2. Ed. Samuel, Richard. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer, 1960. 483–503.Google Scholar
Oakeshott, Michael. Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays. Indianapolis: Liberty Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Oestreich, Gerhard. Geist und Gestalt des frühmodernen Staates: Ausgewählte Aufsätze. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1969.Google Scholar
Oestreich, Gerhard. Neostoicism and the Early Modern State. Ed. Oestreich, Brigitta and Koenigsberger, H. G.. Trans. McLintock, David. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olberding, Amy. “Etiquette: A Confucian Contribution to Moral Philosophy.” Ethics 126.2 (2016): 422–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osterhammel, Jürgen. Unfabling the East: The Enlightenment’s Encounter with Asia. Trans. Savage, Robert. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Oxenford, John. “Iconoclasm in German Philosophy.” Westminster Review 3.2 (1853): 388–407.Google Scholar
Peled, Yoav. “From Theology to Sociology: Bruno Bauer and Karl Marx on the Question of Jewish Emancipation.” History of Political Thought 13.3 (1992): 463–85.Google Scholar
Pilbeam, Pamela. “Bourgeois Society.” In A Companion to Nineteenth-Century Europe 1789–1914. Ed. Berger, Stefan. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009. 86–97.Google Scholar
Pinkard, Terry. German Philosophy 1760–1860: The Legacy of Idealism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podewski, Madleen. “Medienspezifika zwischen Vormärz und Realismus.” In Karl Gutzkow (1811–1878): Publizistik, Literatur und Buchmarkt zwischen Vormärz und Gründerzeit. Ed. Lukas, Wolfgang and Schneider, Ute. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2013. 69–86.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl. The Open Society and Its Enemies II: The High Tide of Prophecy: Hegel, Marx, and the Aftermath, 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Prantl, Carl von. “Gabler, Georg Andreas.” In Allgemeine Deutsche Biographie (1878). www.deutsche-biographie.de/pnd11632662X.html#adbcontent.Google Scholar
Preisendörfer, Bruno. Als Deutschland noch nicht Deutschland war: Reise in die Goethezeit. Cologne: Kiepenhauer & Witz, 2015.Google Scholar
Puryear, Stephen. “Schopenhauer on the Rights of Animals.” European Journal of Philosophy 25.2 (2017): 250–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puryear, Stephen. “Schopenhauer’s Rejection of the Moral Ought.” In Schopenhauer’s Moral Philosophy. Ed. Hassan, Patrick. New York: Routledge, 2022. 12–30.Google Scholar
Requate, Jörg. “Literaturverhältnisse III: Journalismus.” In Vormärz-Handbuch. Ed. Eke, Norbert Otto. Bielefeld: Aisthesis Verlag, 2020. 471–82.Google Scholar
Robbins, Jeremy. “Introduction.” In The Pocket Oracle and the Art of Prudence. Trans. Robbins, Jeremy. London: Penguin, 2011. xxv–xlv.Google Scholar
Rößler, Constantin. “Ein Denkmal für Arthur Schopenhauer.” Preußische Jahrbücher 53.5 (1884): 493–502.Google Scholar
Ruggieri, David. “The Metaphysics of Conflict: Some Reflections on Schopenhauer’s Politics.” Revista Voluntas: Estudos sobre Schopenhauer 7.1 (2016): 140–54.Google Scholar
Ryan, Alan. On Politics: A History of Political Thought from Herodotus to the Present, vol. 2. New York: W. W. Norton, 2012.Google Scholar
Sánchez, Francisco. An Early Bourgeois Literature in Golden Age Spain: Lazarillo de Tormes, Guzmán de Alfarache and Baltasar Gracián. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Safranski, Rüdiger. Goethe: Kunstwerk des Lebens. Biographie. Munich: Carl Hanser, 2013.Google Scholar
Safranski, Rüdiger. Schopenhauer und die wilden Jahre der Philosophie. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer, 2001.Google Scholar
Sassoon, Joseph. The Sassoons: The Great Global Merchants and the Making of an Empire. New York: Pantheon Books, 2022.Google Scholar
Sautermeister, Gert, “Reiseliteratur als Ausdruck der Epoche.” In Zwischen Revolution und Restauration 1815–1848. Hansers Sozialgeschichte der deutschen Literatur, vol. 5. Ed. Sautermeister, Gert and Schmid, Ulrich. Munich: DTV, 1998. 116–50.Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, Friedrich. “Versuch einer Theorie des geselligen Betragens (1799).” In Schriften aus der Berliner Zeit 1796–1799. Ed. Meckenstock, Günter. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1984. 163–84.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Alfred. Idee und Weltwille: Schopenhauer als Kritiker Hegels. Munich: Carl Hanser, 1988.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Joh. Michael. “Thron und Altar: Bemerkungen zum neuzeitlichen deuschen Protestantismus und zu seiner Stellung zwischen Revolution und Reaktion.” Kerygma und Dogma: Zeitschrift für theologische Forschung und kirchliche Lehre x19 (1973): 305–27.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Biggemann, Wilhelm. Der Dämon des 19. Jahrhunderts: Anatomie eines überforderten Säkulums. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: fromman-holzboog, 2021.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. “Schopenhauers Rechtsphilosophie außerhalb seines philosophischen Systems.” Monatsschrift für Kriminalpsychologie und Staatsreform 10 (April–March 1914): 27–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitz, Heinz-Gerd. “Moral oder Klugheit? Überlegungen zur Gestalt der Autonomie des Politischen in Denken Kants.” Kant-Studien 81.4 (1990): 413–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schnädelbach, Herbert. Philosophie in Deutschland 1831–1933. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1983.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Schopenhauer, 6 vols. Ed. Janaway, Christopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009–18.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur. Gesammelte Briefe. Ed. Hübscher, Arthur. Bonn: Bouvier Verlag, 1978.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur. Gespräche. Ed. Hübscher, Arthur. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Friedrich Fromann Verlag, 1971.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur. Der handschriftliche Nachlaß, vol. 1. Ed. Hübscher, Arthur. Frankfurt am Main: Waldemar Kramer, 1966.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur. Der handschriftliche Nachlaß, vol. 2. Ed. Hübscher, Arthur. Frankfurt am Main: Waldemar Kramer, 1967.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur. Der handschriftliche Nachlaß, vol. 3. Ed. Hübscher, Arthur. Frankfurt am Main: Waldemar Kramer, 1970.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur. Der handschriftliche Nachlaß, vol. 4.1. Ed. Hübscher, Arthur. Frankfurt am Main: Waldemar Kramer, 1974.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur. Der handschriftliche Nachlaß, vol. 4.2. Ed. Hübscher, Arthur. Frankfurt am Main: Waldemar Kramer, 1975.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur. Reisetagebücher aus den Jahren 1803–1804. Ed. von Gwinner, Charlotte. Leipzig: F. A. Brockhaus, 1923.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur. Werke in zehn Bände (Zürcher Ausgabe). Ed. Hübscher, Arthur. 10 vols. Zurich: Diogenes, 1977.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Johanna. Reise durch das südliche Frankreich. Rudolstadt: Verlag der Hof-, Buch- und Kunsthandlung, 1817.Google Scholar
Schröder, Gerhart. Baltasar Graciáns Criticon. Munich: Wilhelm Fink, 1966.Google Scholar
Schubbe, Daniel, and Koßler, Matthias, ed. Schopenhauer Handbuch: Leben – Werk – Wirkun, 2nd ed. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler, 2018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schubert, Joh. “Die Auffassung vom Staat bei Schopenhauer und Hegel.” Siebentes Jahrbuch der Schopenhauer-Gesellschaft (1918): 240–4.Google Scholar
Schwaiger, Clemens. “Klugheit bei Kant: Metamorphosen eines Schlüsselbegriffs der praktischen Philosophie.” Aufklärung 14 (2002): 147–59.Google Scholar
Schweppenhäuser, Herrmann. “Schopenhauers Kritik der Kantischen Moraphilosophie.” Schopenhauer Jahrbuch 69 (1988): 409–16.Google Scholar
Segev, Mor. “Schopenhauer’s Critique of Spinoza’s Pantheism, Optimism, and Egoism.” In A Companion to Spinoza. Ed. Melamed, Yitzhak Y.. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 2021. 557–67.Google Scholar
Sengle, Friedrich. Biedermeierzeit: Deutsche Literatur im Spannungsfeld zwischen Restauration und Revolution 1815–1848, vol. 1. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sengle, Friedrich. “Die klassische Kultur von Weimar, sozialgeschichtlich gesehen.” IASL 3.1 (1978): 68–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sexton, Jared. “Affirmation in the Dark.” Comparatist 43 (2019): 90–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapshay, Sandra. “Poetic Intuition and the Bounds of Sense: Metaphor and Metonymy in Schopenhauer’s Philosophy.” In Better Consciousness: Schopenhauer’s Philosophy of Value. Ed. Neill, Alex and Janaway, Christopher. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009. 58–76.Google Scholar
Shapshay, Sandra. Reconstructing Schopenhauer’s Ethics: Hope, Compassion, and Animal Welfare. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheehan, James. German History 1770–1866. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith. “The Liberalism of Fear.” In Liberalism and the Moral Life. Ed. Rosenblum, Nancy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989. 21–38.Google Scholar
Sichelschmidt, Gustav. Liebe, Mord und Abenteuer: Eine Geschichte der deutschen Unterhaltungsliteratur. Berlin: Haude & Spenersche Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1969.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg. “Schopenhauer und Nietzsche.” In Gesamtausgabe, vol. 10. Ed. Rammstedt, Otthein. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1995.Google Scholar
Slaboch, Matthew. “‘Eadem, sed aliter’: Arthur Schopenhauer as a Critic of ‘Progress.’” History of European Ideas 41.7 (2015): 931–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sluga, Glenda. The Invention of the International Order: Remaking Europe after Napoleon. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Sombart, Werner. Der Bourgeois: Zur Geistesgeschichte des modernen Wirtschaftsmenschen. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1923.Google Scholar
Stahl, Friedrich Julius. Der Protestantismus als politisches Prinzip: Vorträge auf Veranstaltung des evangelischen Vereins für kirchliche Zwecke. Berlin: Wilhelm Schulte, 1853.Google Scholar
Stedman Jones, Gareth. Karl Marx: Greatness and Illusion. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stirner, Max. The Ego and Its Own. Trans. Byington, Steven. Ed. Leopold, David. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Strauß, David Friedrich. The Life of Jesus Critically Examined, 4th ed. Trans. Eliot, George. London: Swan Sonnenschein, 1902.Google Scholar
Thompson, I. A. A. “The Institutional Background to the Rise of the Minister-Favourite.” In The World of the Favourite. Ed. Elliott, J. H. and Brockliss, L. W. B.. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1999. 13–25.Google Scholar
Thornhill, Chris. German Political Philosophy: The Metaphysics of Law. London: Routledge, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, Richard. “Moral Standards and Business Behavior in Nineteenth-Century Germany and Britain.” In Bourgeois Society in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Ed. Kocka, Jürgen and Mitchell, Allen. Oxford: Berg, 1993. 179–206.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. Democracy in America. Ed. Kramnick, Isaac: New York: W. W. Norton, 2007.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. Tocqueville on America after 1840: Letters and Other Writings. Trans. and ed. Craiutu, Aurelian and Jennings, Jeremy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Toews, John Edward. Becoming Historical: Cultural Reformation and Public Memory in Early Nineteenth-Century Berlin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Toews, John Edward. “Church and State: The Problem of Authority.” In The Cambridge History of Nineteenth-Century Political Thought. Edited by Steadman-Jones, Gareth and Claes, Gregory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. 603–48.Google Scholar
Toews, John Edward. Hegelianism: The Path toward Dialectical Humanism, 1805–1841. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Tribe, Keith. Governing Economy: The Reformation of German Economic Discourse 1750–1840. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Trilling, Lionel. Sincerity and Authenticity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ueding, Gert. Klassik und Romantik: Deutsche Literatur im Zeitalter der Französischen Revolution 1789–1815. Hansers Sozialgeschichte der deutschen Literatur, vol. 4.1. Munich: DTV, 1987.Google Scholar
Ullrich, Volker. Die nervöse Grossmacht 1871–1918: Aufstieg und Untergang des deutschen Kaiserreichs. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer, 1997.Google Scholar
van der Lugt, Mara. Dark Matters: Pessimism and the Problem of Suffering. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Vieweg, Klaus. Hegel: Der Philosoph der Freiheit. Munich: C. H. Beck, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogl, Joseph. “Luxus.” In Ästhetische Grundbegriffe, vol. 3. Ed. Barck, Karlheinz et al. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler, 2001. 694–708.Google Scholar
Wagner, Richard. Dichtungen und Schriften, vol. 8. Ed. Borchmeyer, Dieter. Frankfurt am Main: Insel, 1983.Google Scholar
Wagner, Ulrike. “Schleiermacher’s Geselligkeit, Henriette Herz, and the ‘Convivial Turn.’” In Conviviality at the Crossroads: The Poetics and Politics of Everyday Encounters. Ed. Hemer, Oscar et al. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020. 65–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. “Civility and Formality.” In Civility, Legality, and Justice in America. Ed. Sarat, Austin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. 46–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waszek, Norbert. “Adam Smith in Germany, 1776–1832.” In Adam Smith: International Perspectives. Ed. Mizuta, Hiroshi and Sugiyama, Chuhei. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1993. 163–80.Google Scholar
Waszek, Norbert. “Philosophie: Hegel’sche Schule, Links- und Rechtshegelianer, Jung- und Althegelianer” Vormärz-Handbuch. Ed. Eke, Norbert Otto. Bielefeld: Aisthesis Verlag, 2020. 372–80.Google Scholar
Weber, Rolf, ed. Johanna Schopenhauer: Im Wechsel der Zeiten, im Gedränge der Welt: Jugenderinnerungen, Tagebücher, Briefe. Munich: Winkler Verlag, 1986.Google Scholar
Wehler, Hans-Ulrich. Deutsche Gesellschaftsgeschichte, 1815–1848/49. Munich: C. H. Beck, 2005.Google Scholar
Weigt, Karl. Die politischen und sozialen Anschauungen Schopenhauers. Hannover-Linden: Wilh. Oppermann, 1899.Google Scholar
Wellbery, David. “Schopenhauer.” In The Routledge Companion to Nineteenth Century Philosophy. Ed. Moyar, Dean. Milton Park: Routledge, 2010. 327–46.Google Scholar
Welsen, Peter. Grundriss Schopenhauer: Ein Handbuch zu Leben und Werk. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 2021.Google Scholar
Wicks, Robert. “Arthur Schopenhauer.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2021. Ed. Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/schopenhauer/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicks, Robert. Review of The Kantian Foundation of Schopenhauer’s Pessimism by Dennis Vanden Auweele. December 12, 2017. https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews/the-kantian-foundation-of-schopenhauers-pessimism/.Google Scholar
Wicks, Robert. Schopenhauer. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, George. The Longing for Myth in Germany: Religion and Aesthetic Culture from Romanticism to Nietzsche. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Wimmer, Andreas. Nationalist Exclusion and Ethnic Conflict: Shadows of Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winkel, Harald. Die deutsche Nationalökonomie im 19. Jahrhundert. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1977.Google Scholar
Winkler, Robin. “Schopenhauer’s Critique of Moralistic Theories of the State.” History of Political Thought 34.2 (2013): 296–323.Google Scholar
Wittmann, Reinhard. Geschichte des deutschen Buchhandels: Ein Überblick. Munich: C. H. Beck, 1991.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon. Politics and Vision: Continuity and Innovation in Western Political Thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Gordon. Empire of Liberty: A History of the Early Republic, 1789–1815. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, David. “Schopenhauer on the State and Morality.” In The Palgrave Schopenhauer Handbook. Ed. Shapshay, Sandra. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. 299–322.Google Scholar
Woods, David. “Schopenhauer’s Sexual Ethics.” In Schopenhauer’s Moral Philosophy. Ed. Hassan, Patrick. New York: Routledge, 2022. 160–72.Google Scholar
Woods, David. “Seriously Bored: Schopenhauer on Solitary Confinement.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 27.5 (2019): 959–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Würkner, Joachim. “Staatsidee und Schopenhauer-Welt.” ARSP: Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 75.1 (1989): 82–103.Google Scholar
Young, Julian. Schopenhauer. Milton Park: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
Yveta, Daniel. “The Cultural History of Crime.” In A Companion to Nineteenth-Century Europe 1789–1914. Ed. Berger, Stefan. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009. 355–68.Google Scholar
Zhang, Chunjie. “Garden Empire or the Sublime Politics of the Chinese-Gothic Style.” Goethe Yearbook 25 (2018): 77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmer, Robert. “Akademische Karriere und das Verhältnis zur akademischen Philosophie.” In Schopenhauer Handbuch: Leben – Werk – Wirkung, 2nd ed. Ed. Schubbe, Daniel and Koßler, Matthias. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler, 2018. 13–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmer, Robert. “Baccalaureus und der Einzige: Schopenhauer und Goethe: Die Geschichte einer Begegnung.” In Schopenhauer und Goethe: Biographische und philosophische Perspektiven. Ed. Schubbe, Daniel und Fauth, Søren. Hamburg: Meiner, 2016. 29–58.Google Scholar
Zimmer, Robert. “‘Europäische Erziehung’ und das Leiden an der Welt.” In Schopenhauer Handbuch: Leben – Werk – Wirkung, 2nd ed. Ed. Schubbe, Daniel and Koßler, Matthias. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler, 2018. 8–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmer, Robert. “Die Familie Schopenhauer.” In Schopenhauer Handbuch: Leben – Werk – Wirkung, 2nd ed. Ed. Schubbe, Daniel and Koßler, Matthias. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler, 2018. 2–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmer, Robert. “Philosophie der Lebenskunst aus dem Geist der Moralistik: Zur Schopenhauers Aphorismen zur Lebensweisheit.” Schopenhauer Jahrbuch 90 (2009): 45–64.Google Scholar
Zimmer, Robert. “Schopenhauers zweites Hauptwerk: Die Parerga und Paralipomena und ihre Wurzeln in der Aufklärungsessayistik und Moralistik.” Schopenhauer Jahrbuch 94 (2013): 143–55.Google Scholar
Zint, Hans. “Schopenhauer und der Sozialismus.” Danziger Volksstimme, vol. 19. February 21, 1928.Google Scholar
Zint, Hans. Schopenhauer als Erlebnis. Munich: Ernst Reinhardt Verlag, 1954.Google Scholar
Zöller, Günter. “German Realism: The Self-Limitation of Idealist Thinking in Fichte, Schelling, and Schopenhauer.” In The Cambridge Companion to German Idealism, 2nd ed. Ed. Ameriks, Karl. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. 292–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zöller, Günter. “Schopenhauer on the Self.” In The Cambridge Companion to Schopenhauer. Ed. Janaway, Christopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. 18–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwolinski, Matt, and Tomasi, John. The Individualists: Radicals, Reactionaries, and the Struggle for the Soul of Libertarianism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2023.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Jakob Norberg, Duke University, North Carolina
  • Book: Schopenhauer's Politics
  • Online publication: 09 January 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009491501.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Jakob Norberg, Duke University, North Carolina
  • Book: Schopenhauer's Politics
  • Online publication: 09 January 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009491501.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Jakob Norberg, Duke University, North Carolina
  • Book: Schopenhauer's Politics
  • Online publication: 09 January 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009491501.010
Available formats
×