Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:16:37.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dietary vitamin D consumption, sunlight exposure, sunscreen use and parental knowledge of vitamin D sources in a cohort of children aged 1–6 years in North West England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2015

A. Aitken
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Chester, Chester, CH1 4BJ
S. Mushtaq
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Chester, Chester, CH1 4BJ
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2015 

Hospital admission for children with rickets in England has dramatically increased, from <1 child per 100,000 in the early 1990's to 4·78 (4·58–4·99) per 100 000 between 2007 and 2011(Reference Goldacre, Hall and Yeates1). The re-emergence of rickets thus suggests poor vitamin D status(Reference Prentice2). Additionally, there has been a plethora of publications associating low vitamin D status with many adverse health outcomes other than the classical role of vitamin D in the development, maintenance and function of a healthy skeleton(Reference Schottker3). Vitamin D is a fat lipophilic steroid pro hormone obtained from few foods in the diet. However, the majority (90–95%) of vitamin D is synthesised from exposure of bare skin to sunlight(Reference Glerup4), and casual sunlight exposure has been considered adequate for the majority of the population. Consequently, there is no reference nutrient intake (RNI) for ages 4–65 yrs(5). With modern indoor lifestyles, cautious sun screen usage and changes in food habits, sunlight exposure may no longer be sufficient to maintain adequate vitamin D status. To avoid vitamin D deficiency, supplementation and fortification may need to play a more prominent role in everyday lives(Reference Ruxton and Derbyshire6).

The aim of the present study was to investigate vitamin D dietary intake in children, parents’ knowledge of vitamin D sources, children's outdoor habits and sun screen application practices. A retrospective, cross sectional study approach was utilised. Parents of children (n = 42) aged between 1 and 6 yrs completed a semi-validated food frequency questionnaire, a sources of vitamin D knowledge questionnaire, and a sunlight exposure and sunscreen use questionnaire, in Adlington, N.W. England (latitude 55oN) during May 2013.

Children's mean (±SD) dietary vitamin D intake was 4·4 ± 2·5 μg/d, significantly lower than 7μg/d (P =  < 0·001, for comparison 7μg/d, the RNI for ages 3 months-4 yrs was used). As expected, children taking supplements had a significantly higher mean (±SD) vitamin D intake (8·49 ± 1·78 μg/d) compared to those that did not supplement (3·34 ± 1·23 μg/d, P < 0·001). The greatest contribution to dietary vitamin D intake from food was from butter and spreads (0·028μg/d), followed by cakes, biscuits & scones (0·023μg/d). Parents' knowledge of food sources was poor, with a mean (±SD) incorrect response of 76% ±11·2. Contrastingly, 93% correctly identified sunlight exposure as a potential source of vitamin D. Eighty nine percent of participants played outdoors daily for 1 hour or more, 81% used sunscreen with an SPF ≥30 and only 2% rarely applied sunscreen.

This study revealed that children's diet in the NW England is lacking sufficient vitamin D content, in line with larger surveys(Reference Whitton, Nicholson and Roberts7, Reference Lennox, Sommerville and Ong8). Parents' knowledge regarding vitamin D dietary sources was poor but 93% of parents knew that sunlight was the non-dietary source of vitamin D. Outdoor play indicated sufficient exposure time to produce endogenous vitamin D but sunscreen usage may have potentially diminished epidermal UVB exposures.

Further research is needed using biomarkers to confirm vitamin D insufficiency, and public health strategies should be implemented to promote existing recommendations regarding supplementation and consumption of vitamin D rich foods. Additionally, guidelines for safe sun exposure and sunscreen use are required.

References

1.Goldacre, M, Hall, N & Yeates, DG (2014) Hospitalisation for children with rickets in England: a historical perspective. Lancet 383, 597–8.Google Scholar
2.Prentice, A (2013) Nutritional rickets around the world, Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 136, 201–6.Google Scholar
3.Schottker, B et al. (2013) Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and overall mortality. A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Ageing Res Rev 12, 708–18.Google Scholar
4.Glerup, H et al. (2000) Commonly recommended daily intake of vitamin D is not sufficient if sunlight exposure is limited. J Intern Med 247, 260–8.Google Scholar
5.Department of Health (1998) D., Nutrition and bone health: with particular reference to calcium and vitamin D no.49. London: The Stationary Office.Google Scholar
6.Ruxton, C & Derbyshire, E (2009) Health impacts of vitamin D: are we getting enough? Nutrition Bulletin 34,185197.Google Scholar
7.Whitton, C, Nicholson, SK & Roberts, C et al. National Diet and Nutrition Survey: UK food consumption and nutrient intakes from the first year of the rolling programme and comparisons with previous surveys. Br J Nutr 106, 1899–914.Google Scholar
8.Lennox, A, Sommerville, J & Ong, K et al. (2013) Diet and Nutrition Survey of Infants and Young Children, 2011. Department of Health & Food Standards Agency.Google Scholar