Article contents
Memory reconsolidation, emotional arousal, and the process of change in psychotherapy: New insights from brain science
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 May 2014
Abstract
Since Freud, clinicians have understood that disturbing memories contribute to psychopathology and that new emotional experiences contribute to therapeutic change. Yet, controversy remains about what is truly essential to bring about psychotherapeutic change. Mounting evidence from empirical studies suggests that emotional arousal is a key ingredient in therapeutic change in many modalities. In addition, memory seems to play an important role but there is a lack of consensus on the role of understanding what happened in the past in bringing about therapeutic change. The core idea of this paper is that therapeutic change in a variety of modalities, including behavioral therapy, cognitive-behavioral therapy, emotion-focused therapy, and psychodynamic psychotherapy, results from the updating of prior emotional memories through a process of reconsolidation that incorporates new emotional experiences. We present an integrated memory model with three interactive components – autobiographical (event) memories, semantic structures, and emotional responses – supported by emerging evidence from cognitive neuroscience on implicit and explicit emotion, implicit and explicit memory, emotion-memory interactions, memory reconsolidation, and the relationship between autobiographical and semantic memory. We propose that the essential ingredients of therapeutic change include: (1) reactivating old memories; (2) engaging in new emotional experiences that are incorporated into these reactivated memories via the process of reconsolidation; and (3) reinforcing the integrated memory structure by practicing a new way of behaving and experiencing the world in a variety of contexts. The implications of this new, neurobiologically grounded synthesis for research, clinical practice, and teaching are discussed.
- Type
- Target Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015
References
- 317
- Cited by
Target article
Memory reconsolidation, emotional arousal, and the process of change in psychotherapy: New insights from brain science
Related commentaries (28)
A clinician's perspective on memory reconsolidation as the primary basis for psychotherapeutic change in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)1
Changing maladaptive memories through reconsolidation: A role for sleep in psychotherapy?
Clinical applications of counterfactual thinking during memory reactivation
Deconstructing the process of change in cognitive behavioral therapy: An alternative approach focusing on the episodic retrieval mode
Disruption of reconsolidation processes is a balancing act – can it really account for change in psychotherapy?
Emotion regulation as a main mechanism of change in psychotherapy
Focus on emotion as a catalyst of memory updating during reconsolidation
How do we remember traumatic events? Exploring the role of neuromodulation
How does psychotherapy work? A case study in multilevel explanation
Let's be skeptical about reconsolidation and emotional arousal in therapy
Memory reconsolidation and psychotherapeutic process
Memory reconsolidation and self-reorganization
Memory reconsolidation keeps track of emotional changes, but what will explain the actual “processing”?
Memory reconsolidation, repeating, and working through: Science and culture in psychotherapeutic research and practice
Mental model construction, not just memory, is a central component of cognitive change in psychotherapy
Minding the findings: Let's not miss the message of memory reconsolidation research for psychotherapy
Multiple traces or Fuzzy Traces? Converging evidence for applications of modern cognitive theory to psychotherapy
Psychopathology arises from intertemporal bargaining as well as from emotional trauma
Reconsolidation or re-association?
Reconsolidation versus retrieval competition: Rival hypotheses to explain memory change in psychotherapy
Reconsolidation: Turning consciousness into memory
Social-psychological evidence for the effective updating of implicit attitudes1
The importance of the rites of passage in assigning semantic structures to autobiographical memory
The nature of the semantic/episodic memory distinction: A missing piece of the “working through” process
The relevance of maintaining and worsening processes in psychopathology
Therapeutic affect reduction, emotion regulation, and emotional memory reconsolidation: A neuroscientific quandary
Top-down versus bottom-up perspectives on clinically significant memory reconsolidation
Trade-offs between the accuracy and integrity of autobiographical narrative in memory reconsolidation
Author response
The integrated memory model: A new framework for understanding the mechanisms of change in psychotherapy