Tables
2.1Impacts of IP-based knowledge transfer policies on universities/public research institutes and firms
2.2Socioeconomic effects of IP-based knowledge transfer policies
2.7Variables for standardizing knowledge transfer office (KTO) metrics
3.1Comparison of PATSTAT national patent data coverage for featured countries
3.2Share of patent applications filed in selected technology fields by applicant type, 2013–15
3.4Top PCT applicants among governments and public research institutes in 2016
3.5Top fifty-five patent applicants worldwide, based on total number of patent families, 2010–13
3.6Top five university and public research institute patent applicants worldwide by selected origins, 2010–13
4.2Indicators of research commercialization activities in UK universities
4.3Summary indicators of research commercialization activities in UK PSREs
4.5Cooperation on innovation activities with universities and government at different geographical levels
5.1Selected key features of German public research institutes
5.2Top-ranking universities for patent applications, 1990–2009, and research
5.3Public research institute heads’ assessment of their institutes’ key tasks (%)
5.4KTT by leading German public research institutes at a glance
5.6Main users of public research institute research, as identified by public research institute heads
5.7University researchers’ patent activity by applicant type, 1995–2008
5.8Academic entrepreneurship before and after the 2002 policy reform (annual mean values), 1995–2008
5.9Importance of main knowledge transfer channels, by universities and public research institutes, 1997–9
5.10External funding and channels of commercialization as reported by researchers in 2008
5.11Key characteristics of the three case study universities
6.1Public R&D expenditure and number of Korean public research institutes and universities, 2000–14
6.2Number of domestic patent applications by public research institutes and universities 2000–15
6.3Output of R&D activities by Korean public research institutes and universities – new technologies and knowledge transfer, 2007–14
6.4Output of R&D activities by Korean public research institutes and universities – license income, 2007–14
6.5University knowledge transfer contracts by industry, 2011–13
6.6Firms reporting universities or research institutes as sources of innovation information, 2011–13
6.7Primary types of cooperation with public research organizations among surveyed firms
6.8Knowledge transfer contracts and share of different types of knowledge transfer, 2007–14
7.1Main policies and instruments for S&T funding in Brazil in 2012
7.2Number of research infrastructures in Brazil by launch period
7.3Number of universities, research universities, and federal technological institutions in Brazil in 2015
7.4R&D investment by the main public universities in Brazil in 2012
7.5Budget or revenues of the main public research institutes in Brazil in 2014
7.6Number of patents filed by Brazilian universities and research institutions at the National Institute of Industrial Property, 2000–12
7.7Firms that innovated using a cooperation agreement with a university or public research institute in 2014
7.8Knowledge transfer contracts undertaken by Brazilian public research institutes and public universities by type of contract in 2014
8.1Number of SCI-indexed papers by different organizations in China, 2003–17
8.2Share of transaction value of knowledge transfer contracts by seller types, 2009–16 (%)
8.3Patent applications, grants, and transfers by 1,497 universities in 2015
8.4R&D and licensing modes of universities and public research institutes (%)
9.1R&D expenditure of leading universities, public research institutes, and state-owned enterprises, 2013–14
9.3Share of innovative firms rating sources of information for innovation as “highly important”
9.4R&D expenditure and knowledge transfer metrics for four leading universities in 2014
9.5Metrics of the knowledge transfer activities of South African universities and public research institutes, fiscal year 2013–14
10.1Policies to support knowledge transfer for differing capabilities of public research organizations and firms
11.2Differences between the national systems of innovation of six high- and middle-income countries
12.1Data collected for IP-mediated knowledge transfer plus research agreements at the institutional level (results for six countries)
12.2Data collected for IP policies at the national (✓)or institutional (✓✓)level (results for six countries)
12.3Metrics at the institutional level for policies and practices to support knowledge transfer
12.4Data collected in previous surveys of academic engagement
12.5Knowledge transfer metrics from surveys of academics and firms
Open access