Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:47:46.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Re-thinking the causes, processes, and consequences of simulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2010

Betty Chang  and
Nicolas Vermeulen
Betty Chang
Affiliation:
Université Catholique de Louvain (UCL), 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. [email protected]://www.uclouvain.be/en-277800.html
Nicolas Vermeulen
Affiliation:
Université Catholique de Louvain (UCL), 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. [email protected]://www.uclouvain.be/en-277800.html National Fund for Scientific Research (FRS-FNRS), 1000 Brussels, Belgium. [email protected]://www.ecsa.ucl.ac.be/personnel/vermeulen/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We argue that the meaning of smiles is interpreted from physical/contextual cues, and simulation may simply reinforce the information derived from these cues. We suggest that, contrary to the claim of the SIMS model, positive and negative smiles may invoke similar simulation processes. Finally, we provide alternative explanations for the role of eye contact in the processing of smiles.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 33 , Issue 6 , December 2010 , pp. 441 - 442
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, R. B. Jr. & Kleck, R. E. (2003) Perceived gaze direction and the processing of facial displays of emotion. Psychological Science 14(6):644–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adams, R. B. Jr. & Kleck, R. E. (2005) Effects of direct and averted gaze on the perception of facially communicated emotion. Emotion 5(1):3–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Argyle, M. & Cook, M. (1976) Gaze and mutual gaze. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cacioppo, J., Petty, R., Losch, M. & Kim, H. (1986) Electromyographic activity over facial muscle regions can differentiate the valence and intensity of affective reactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50:260–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cannon, P. R., Hayes, A. E. & Tipper, S. P. (2009) An electromyographic investigation of the impact of task relevance on facial mimicry. Cognition and Emotion 23:918–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cary, M. S. (1978) The role of gaze in the initiation of conversation. Social Psychology Quarterly 41:269–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, R. J. & Hugdahl, K., eds. (1995) Brain asymmetry. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dimberg, U., Thunberg, M. & Elmehed, K. (2000) Unconscious facial reactions to emotional facial expressions. Psychological Science 11:86–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V. & Ancoli, S. (1980) Facial signs of emotional experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39:1125–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, M. G. (2002) Smiles, lies, and emotion. In: An empirical reflection on the smile, ed. Abel, M. H., pp. 15–44. Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Harmon-Jones, E. & Segilman, J. (2001) State anger and prefrontal brain activity: Evidence that insult-related relative left-prefrontal activation is associated with experienced anger and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80:797–803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hess, U. & Kleck, R. E. (1990) Differentiating emotion elicited and deliberate emotional facial expressions. European Journal of Social Psychology 20:369–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maringer, M., Krumhuber, E., Fischer, A. H. & Niedenthal, P. M. (in press) Beyond smile dynamics: Mimicry and beliefs in judgments of smiles. Emotion.Google Scholar
Schrammel, F., Pannasch, S., Graupner, S.-T., Mojzisch, A. & Velichkovsky, B. M. (2009) Virtual friend or threat? The effects of facial expressions and gaze interaction on psychophysiological responses and emotional experience. Psychophysiology 46:922–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed