Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:33:33.335Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

HOPEWELL BLADELETS: A BAYESIAN RADIOCARBON ANALYSIS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2018

G. Logan Miller
G. Logan Miller*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Campus Box 4660, Illinois State University, Normal, IL 61790, USA ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Hopewell bladelets may be the most common diagnostic artifact of the Hopewell Interaction Sphere. As such, they are often recognized as a Middle Woodland “index fossil” and a key materialized indication of Hopewell ceremonialism. However, few formal analyses of their occurrence across space and time exist. Drawing on published reports, as well as an extensive review of the unpublished gray literature, I present a Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon-dated, bladelet-bearing features from across Ohio. The Bayesian model provides insight into previously unrecognized temporal variation in this element of Hopewell material culture. Results indicate that bladelets are present from around the BC/AD switch to nearly AD 500 in certain portions of the state. Analysis by major drainages indicates that bladelets occur earliest in southern and central Ohio before subsequently spreading north to the Lake Erie region. Understanding the spatial and temporal variation in artifact classes such as Hopewell bladelets is essential to explaining prehistoric cultural processes.

Las navajillas Hopewell pueden considerarse el artefacto de diagnóstico más común de la esfera de interacción Hopewell. Como tal, a menudo se les reconoce como “fósil índice” del Silvícola medio y un indicador material clave del ceremonialismo Hopewell. Sin embargo, existen pocos análisis formales de su ocurrencia a través del espacio y el tiempo. Con base en informes publicados y en una extensa revisión de la literatura gris inédita, se presenta un análisis bayesiano de rasgos contenientes navajillas y fechados por radiocarbono a lo largo del estado de Ohio. El modelo bayesiano revela una variación temporal no anteriormente reconocida en este elemento de la cultura material Hopewell. Los resultados indican que las navajillas estuvieron presentes en ciertas partes del estado entre el primer y quinto siglo dC. Tomando en cuenta su distribución alrededor de los drenajes principales, el análisis revela que las navajillas ocurren primero en Ohio meridional y central y luego se difunden hacia la región del Lago Erie en el norte. Un entendimiento preciso de la variación espacial y temporal de clases de artefactos como las navajillas Hopewell es esencial para explicar los procesos culturales prehistóricos.

Type
Articles
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 83 , Issue 2 , April 2018 , pp. 224 - 243
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 by the Society for American Archaeology 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Abrams, Elliot M. 2009 Hopewell Archaeology: A View from the Northern Woodlands. Journal of Archaeological Research 17:169–204.Google Scholar
Aument, Bruce, and Gibbs, Kevin 1991 Phase III and IV Data Recovery Survey of 33FR985 and 33FR901 on the Wal-mart Property in Grove City, Franklin County, Ohio. Submitted to the US Army Corps of Engineers. Copies available from the State Historic Preservation Office–Ohio History Connection, Columbus.Google Scholar
Baltz, Christopher, and Picklesimer, John W. II 2007 Phase II Investigations of Site 33RO1090 within the Proposed US 35/CR550 (Pleasant Valley Road) Interchange in Union and Scioto Townships, Ross County, Ohio. Copies available from the State Historic Preservation Office–Ohio History Connection, Columbus.Google Scholar
Bauermeister, Ann C. 2010 Feature Finds from the Riverbank Site, 33RO1059. Hopewell Archeology: The Newsletter of Hopewell Archeology in the Ohio River Valley 7 (2). Electronic document, http://www.nps.gov/mwac/hopewell/v7n2/five.html, accessed October 18, 2017.Google Scholar
Bayliss, Alex 2009 Rolling Out Revolution: Using Radiocarbon Dating in Archaeology. Radiocarbon 51:123–147.Google Scholar
Bernardini, Wesley, and Carr, Christopher 2005 Hopewellian Copper Celts from Eastern North America. In Gathering Hopewell, edited by Carr, Christopher and Case, D. Troy, pp. 624–647. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Berstan, Robert, Stott, Andrew W., Minnitt, Steve, Ramsey, Christopher Bronk, Hedges, Robert E. M., and Evershed, Richard P. 2008 Direct Dating of Pottery from Its Organic Residues: New Precision Using Compound-Specific Carbon Isotopes. Antiquity 82:702–713.Google Scholar
Binford, Lewis R. 1965 Archaeological Systematics and the Study of Culture Process. American Antiquity 33:203–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boatman, Glenwood 2014 Heckelman Site (33ER14) Exploratory Trench No. 2 Excavation Report. Ohio Archaeologist 64 (1):16–17.Google Scholar
Boulanger, Matthew T., Lattanzi, Gregory D., Roush, Cody C., and Glascock, Michael D. 2017 Geochemical Analysis of Mica Source Specimens and Artifacts from the Abbott Farm National Historic Landmark (28ME1). American Antiquity 82:374–396.Google Scholar
Braun, David P. 1986 Midwestern Hopewellian Exchange and Supralocal Interaction. In Peer Polity Interaction and Socio-political Change, edited by Renfrew, Colin and Cherry, John F., pp. 117–126. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, Christopher 2009a Bayesian Analysis of Radiocarbon Dates. Radiocarbon 51:337–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, Christopher 2009b Dealing with Outliers and Offsets in Radiocarbon Dating. Radiocarbon 51:1023–1045.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, Christopher 2013 OxCal 4.2.4. Electronic document, https://c14.arch.ox.ac.uk/oxcalhelp/hlp_contents.html, accessed November 5, 2017.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, Christopher, and Lee, Sharen 2013 Recent and Planned Developments of the Program OxCal. Radiocarbon 55:720–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Joel 2011 Phase III Data Recovery for Archaeological Site 33-Li-1767 Located within the Approximately 2.3 Mile Etna Parkway Extension in Etna Township, Licking County, Ohio. Copies available from the State Historic Preservation Office–Ohio History Connection, Columbus.Google Scholar
Buikstra, Jane, and Charles, Douglas 1999 Centering the Ancestors: Cemeteries, Mounds, and Sacred Landscapes of the Ancient North American Midcontinent. In Archaeologies of the Landscape: Contemporary Perspectives, edited by Ashmore, Wendy and Knapp, A. Bernard, pp. 201–228. Blackwell, Malden, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Burks, Jarrod 2004 Identifying Household Cluster and Refuse Disposal Patterns at the Strait Site: A Third Century A.D. Nucleated Settlement in the Middle Ohio River Valley. PhD dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus.Google Scholar
Byers, A. Martin 2004 The Ohio Hopewell Episode: Paradigm Lost and Paradigm Gained. University of Akron Press, Akron, Ohio.Google Scholar
Byers, A. Martin 2006 The Earthwork/Habitation Dichotomy: A Central Problem in Ohio Hopewell. In Recreating Hopewell, edited by Charles, Douglas and Buikstra, Jane, pp. 62–73. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Byers, A. Martin 2011 Sacred Games, Death, and Renewal in the Ancient Eastern Woodlands: The Ohio Hopewell System of Cult Sodality Heterarchies. AltaMira Press, Lanham, Maryland.Google Scholar
Byers, A. Martin 2015 Reclaiming the Hopewellian Ceremonial Sphere: 200 B.C. to A.D. 500. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.Google Scholar
Caldwell, Joseph 1955 Interaction Spheres in Prehistory. Illinois State Museum Scientific Papers 12 (6):133–156.Google Scholar
Charles, Douglas K. 1995 Diachronic Regional Social Dynamics: Mortuary Sites in the Illinois Valley/American Bottom Region. In Regional Approaches to Mortuary Analysis, edited by Beck, Linda, pp. 77–99. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
Charles, Douglas K. 2012 Origins of the Hopewell Phenomenon. In The Oxford Handbook of North American Archaeology, edited by Pauketat, Timothy R., pp. 471–482. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Church, Flora, Cremeens, David L., and Ericksen, Annette G. 1991 The Hunter 1 Site: Mitigation of a Multi-component Late Woodland Site in Blue Rock Township, Muskingum County, Ohio. Submitted to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Copies available from the State Historic Preservation Office–Ohio History Connection, Columbus.Google Scholar
Clay, R. Berle 2014 What Does Mortuary Variability in the Ohio Valley Middle Woodland Mean? Agency, Its Projects, and Interpretive Ambiguity. Southeastern Archaeology 33:143–152.Google Scholar
Connolly, Robert P. 1996 Prehistoric Land Modification at the Fort Ancient Hilltop Enclosure. In Ohio Hopewell Community Organization, edited by Dancey, William and Pacheco, Paul, pp. 258–273. Kent State University Press, Kent, Ohio.Google Scholar
Connolly, Robert P. 2004 Time Space and Function at Fort Ancient. In The Fort Ancient Earthworks: Prehistoric Lifeways of the Hopewell Culture in Southwestern Ohio, edited by Connolly, Robert P. and Lepper, Bradley T., pp. 217–222. Ohio Historical Society, Columbus.Google Scholar
Dancey, William S. 1991 A Middle Woodland Settlement in Central Ohio: A Preliminary Report on the Murphy Site (33LI212). Pennsylvania Archaeologist 61 (2):37–72.Google Scholar
Dancey, William S. 1996 Putting an End to Ohio Hopewell. In A View from the Core: A Synthesis of Ohio Hopewell Archaeology, edited by Pacheco, Paul J., pp. 394–405. Ohio Archaeological Council, Columbus.Google Scholar
Dancey, William S. 2005 The Enigmatic Hopewell of the Eastern Woodlands. In North American Archaeology, edited by Pauketat, Timothy and Loren, Diana DiPaolo, pp. 108–137. Wiley-Blackwell, New York.Google Scholar
Dancey, William S. 2009 Middle Woodland and Other Settlement Remains in the Overly Tract near the Hopeton Earthwork, Ross County, Ohio. In In the Footprints of Squier and Davis: Archaeological Fieldwork in Ross County, Ohio, edited by Lynott, Mark, pp. 77–143. Special Report No. 5. Midwest Archeological Center, Lincoln, Nebraska.Google Scholar
Dancey, William, and Pacheco, Paul 1997 A Community Model of Ohio Hopewell Settlement Pattern. In Ohio Hopewell Community Organization, edited by Dancey, William and Pacheco, Paul, pp. 3–40. Kent State University Press, Kent, Ohio.Google Scholar
DeMuth, George B., Boatman, Glenwood, Young, William, Edgerly, Roger, Gross, Richard, and Edwards, Timothy 2016 Metz Transitional Ware (B.C. 300–A.D. 700): A Case for Cultural Continuity in North Central Ohio from the Leimbach Culture to the Sandusky Tradition. Archaeology of Eastern North America 44:99–130.Google Scholar
Dunnell, Robert C. 1971 Systematics in Prehistory. Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
Emerson, Thomas E., Farnsworth, Kenneth B., Wisseman, Sarah U., and Hughes, Randall E. 2013 The Allure of the Exotic: Reexamining the Use of Local and Distant Pipestone Quarries in Ohio Hopewell Pipe Caches. American Antiquity 8:48–67.Google Scholar
Emerson, Thomas E., Hughes, Randall E., Farnsworth, Kenneth B., Wisseman, Sarah U., and Hynes, Mary R. 2005 Tremper Mound, Hopewell Catlinite, and Pima Technology. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 30:189–216.Google Scholar
Farnsworth, Kenneth, and Atwell, Karen 2015 Excavations at the Blue Island and Naples-Russell Mounds and Related Hopewellian Sites in the Lower Illinois Valley. Research Report 34. Illinois State Archaeological Survey, Champaign.Google Scholar
Finney, Fred 2002 Calumet, Canal, and Cuyahoga: An Archaeological Overview and Assessment of the Cuyahoga Valley National Park, Cuyahoga County, Ohio. Submitted to the National Park Service, Lincoln, Nebraska. Copies available from the State Historic Preservation Office–Ohio History Connection, Columbus.Google Scholar
Fortier, Andrew 2000 The Emergence and Demise of the Middle Woodland Small-Tool Tradition in the American Bottom. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 25:191–213.Google Scholar
Greber, N'omi 1983 Recent Excavations at the Edwin Harness Mound, Liberty Works, Ross County, Ohio. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology Special Paper No. 5. Kent State University Press, Kent, Ohio.Google Scholar
Greber, N'omi 2003 Chronological Relationships among Ohio Hopewell Sites: Few Dates and Much Complexity. In Theory, Method, and Practice in Modern Archaeology, edited by Jeske, Robert and Charles, Douglas, pp. 88–113. Praeger Press, Westport, Connecticut.Google Scholar
Greber, N'omi, Davis, Richard, and DuFresne, Ann 1981 The Micro Component of the Ohio Hopewell Lithic Technology: Bladelets. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 376:489–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, James B. 1967 Eastern North American Archaeology: A Summary. Science 156:175–191.Google Scholar
Griffin, James B. 1983 The Midlands. In Ancient North Americans, edited by Jennings, Jesse D., pp. 243–302. W. H. Freeman, New York.Google Scholar
Harkness, Barbara M. 1982 Implications for Ohio Hopewell Polity Suggested by Lithic and Iconographic Analysis. PhD dissertation, Union for Experimenting Colleges and Universities, Cincinnati, Ohio.Google Scholar
Hofman, Jack L. 1987 Hopewell Blades from Twenhafel: Distinguishing Local and Foreign Core Technology. In The Organization of Core Technology, edited by Johnson, Jay K. and Morrow, Carol A., pp. 87–117. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
Jefferies, Richard W. 2006 Death Rituals at the Tunacunnhee Site. In Recreating Hopewell, edited by Charles, Douglas K. and Buikstra, Jane E., pp. 161–177. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Kanter, Noah, Pacheco, Paul J., Perucchio, Renato, and Burks, Jarrod 2015 Living Large on the Bottom: A Structural Engineering Analysis of Three Ohio Hopewell Structures from Brown's Bottom, Ross County, Ohio. In Building the Past: Prehistoric Wooden Post Architecture in the Ohio Valley–Great Lakes, edited by Redmond, Brian and Genheimer, Robert, pp. 146–187. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Kay, Marvin, and Mainfort, Robert C. Jr. 2014 Functional Analysis of Prismatic Blades and Bladelets from Pinson Mounds, Tennessee. Journal of Archaeological Science 51:63–83.Google Scholar
Keith, Scot J. 2013 The Woodland Period Cultural Landscape of the Leake Site Complex. In Early and Middle Woodland Landscapes of the Southeast, edited by Wright, Alice P. and Henry, Edward P., pp. 138–152. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Kimball, Larry R. 1992 The Function of Hopewell Blades from the Southeast. Frank H. McClung Museum Research Notes 12. University of Tennessee, Knoxville.Google Scholar
King, Jason, Buikstra, Jane, and Charles, Douglas 2011 Time and Archaeological Traditions in the Lower Illinois Valley. American Antiquity 76:500–528.Google Scholar
Kozarek, Sue Ellen, Myers, Ruth G., and Connolly, Robert P. 1993 Phase II and IV Archaeological Investigations of the Perin Village Site (33 HA 124) and the Martin Field Site (33 HA 588), Anderson Township, Hamilton County, Ohio. Copies available from the State Historic Preservation Office–Ohio History Connection, Columbus.Google Scholar
Leigh, Steven R. 1988 Comparative Analysis of the Elizabeth Middle Woodland Artifact Assemblage. In The Archaic and Woodland Cemeteries at the Elizabeth Site in the Lower Illinois Valley, edited by Charles, Douglas, Leigh, Steven, and Buikstra, Jane, pp. 191–217. Research Series Vol. 7. Center for American Archeology, Kampsville, Illinois.Google Scholar
Lepper, Bradley T., and Yerkes, Richard W. 1997 Hopewellian Occupations at the Northern Periphery of the Newark Earthworks. In Ohio Hopewell Community Organization, edited by Dancey, William S. and Pacheco, Paul J., pp. 175–205. Kent State University Press, Kent, Ohio.Google Scholar
Libby, William F. 1955 Radiocarbon Dating. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Lynott, Mark J. 2009 Searching for Hopewell Settlements: The Triangle Site at the Hopeton Earthworks. In In the Footprints of Squier and Davis: Archaeological Fieldwork in Ross County, Ohio, edited by Lynott, Mark, pp. 125–144. Special Report No. 5. Midwest Archeological Center, Lincoln, Nebraska.Google Scholar
Lynott, Mark J. 2014 Hopewell Ceremonial Landscapes of Ohio: More than Mounds and Geometric Earthworks. American Landscapes Vol. 1. Oxbow, Oxford.Google Scholar
Lynott, Mark J., and Mandel, Rolfe D. 2009 Archaeological and Geoarchaeological Study of the Rectangular Enclosure at the Hopeton Works. In In the Footprints of Squier and Davis: Archaeological Fieldwork in Ross County, Ohio, edited by Lynott, Mark, pp. 159–178. Special Report No. 5. Midwest Archeological Center, Lincoln, Nebraska.Google Scholar
McKern, William C. 1939 The Midwestern Taxonomic Method as an Aid to Archaeological Culture Study. American Antiquity 4:301–313.Google Scholar
Miller, G. Logan 2014a Ohio Hopewell Ceremonial Bladelet Use at the Moorehead Circle, Fort Ancient. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 39:83–102.Google Scholar
Miller, G. Logan 2014b Ritual, Craft, and Economy in Ohio Hopewell: An Examination of Two Earthworks on the Little Miami River. PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Ohio State University, Columbus.Google Scholar
Miller, G. Logan 2015 Ritual Economy and Craft Production in Small-Scale Societies: Evidence from Microwear Analysis of Hopewell Bladelets. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 39:124–138.Google Scholar
Montet-White, Anna 1968 Lithic Industries of the Illinois Valley in the Early and Middle Woodland Period. Museum of Anthropology Anthropological Papers No. 35. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Morrow, Carol A. 1998 Blade Technology and Nonlocal Chert: Hopewell(?) Traits at the Twenhafel Site, Southern Illinois. In Changing Perspectives on the Archaeology of the Central Mississippi River Valley, edited by O'Brien, Michael and Dunnell, Robert, pp. 281–298. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Nakamura, Toshio, Taniguchi, Yasuhiro, Tsuji, Sei ichiro, and Oda, Hirotaka 2011 Radiocarbon Dating of Charred Residues on the Earliest Pottery in Japan. Radiocarbon 43:1129–1138.Google Scholar
Nolan, David J., and Bainter, Thomas N. 2004 Flint Ridge Artifacts from the Central Illinois River Valley. Illinois Antiquity 39 (3):8–9.Google Scholar
Nolan, Kevin C. 2012 Temporal Hygiene: Problems in Cultural Chronology of the Late Prehistoric Period of the Middle Ohio River Valley. Southeastern Archaeology 31:187–209.Google Scholar
Nolan, Kevin C., Seeman, Mark F., and Hill, Mark A. 2017 New Dates on Scioto Hopewell Sites: A SCHoN Project. Current Research in Ohio Archaeology. Electronic document, http://www.ohioarchaeology.org, accessed October 17, 2017.Google Scholar
Nolan, Kevin C., Seeman, Mark F., and Theler, James L. 2007 A Quantitative Analysis of Skill and Efficiency: Hopewell Blade Production at the Turner Workshop, Hamilton County, Ohio. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 32:297–330.Google Scholar
Odell, George H. 1994 The Role of Stone Bladelets in Middle Woodland Society. American Antiquity 59:102–120.Google Scholar
Pacheco, Paul 1991 Woodland Period Archaeology in Central Ohio: LCALS Contributions. OAC Newsletter 3 (3): 4–7.Google Scholar
Pacheco, Paul 1996 Ohio Hopewell Regional Settlement Patterns. In A View from the Core: A Synthesis of Ohio Hopewell Archaeology, edited by Pacheco, Paul, pp. 16–35. Ohio Archaeological Council, Columbus.Google Scholar
Pacheco, Paul J., Burks, Jarrod, and Wymer, Dee Anne 2005 Investigating Ohio Hopewell Settlement Patterns in Central Ohio: A Preliminary Report of Archaeology at Brown's Bottom #1 (33Ro21). Current Research in Ohio Archaeology. Electronic document, http://ohioarchaeology.org/component/content/article/31-resources/research/articles-and-abstracts-2005/157-investigating-ohio-hopewell-settlement-patterns-in-central-ohio, accessed October 18, 2017.Google Scholar
Pacheco, Paul J., Burks, Jarrod, and Wymer, Dee Anne 2009 The 2007–2008 Archaeological Investigations at Lady's Run (33R01105). Current Research in Ohio Archaeology. Electronic document, http://ohioarchaeology.org/component/content/article/45-resources/research/articles-and-abstracts-2009/293-the-2007-2008-archaeological-investigations-at-ladys-run-33r01105, accessed October 18, 2017.Google Scholar
Pacheco, P., and Dancey, W. 2006 Integrating Mortuary and Settlement Data on Ohio Hopewell Society. In Recreating Hopewell: New Perspectives on Middle Woodland in Eastern North America, edited by Charles, Douglas K. and Buikstra, Jane E., pp. 3–25. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Parry, William J. 1994 Prismatic Blade Technologies in North America. In The Organization of North American Prehistoric Chipped Stone Technologies, edited by Carr, Phillip J., pp. 87–98. Archaeological Series 7. International Monographs in Prehistory, Ann Arbor, Michigan.Google Scholar
Pecora, Albert, and Burks, Jarrod 2006 Phase III Archaeological Data Recovery of Sites 33AT980 and 33AT982 within the Proposed SR 144 Relocation and Improvement Project in Troy Township, Athens County, Ohio. Submitted to the Department of Transportation. Copies available from the State Historic Preservation Office–Ohio History Connection, Columbus.Google Scholar
Pecora, Albert, Kener, Craig, and Burks, Jarrod 2005 Phase II Archaeological Assessment of Site 33 WN 425 along the SR 7 Widening Project (WAS-7-24.96), Marietta Township, Washington County, Ohio (PID 76224). Copies available from the State Historic Preservation Office–Ohio History Connection, Columbus.Google Scholar
Pettitt, Paul B., Davies, William, Gamble, Clive S., and Richards, Martin B. 2003 Palaeolithic Radiocarbon Chronology: Quantifying Our Confidence beyond Two Half-Lives. Journal of Archaeological Science 30:1685–1693.Google Scholar
Pi-Sunyer, Oriol 1965 The Flint Industry. In The McGraw Site: A Study in Hopewellian Dynamics, edited by Prufer, Olaf H., pp. 60–89. Scientific Publication 4. Cleveland Museum of Natural History, Cleveland, Ohio.Google Scholar
Redmond, Brian G. 2007 Hopewell on the Sandusky: Analysis and Description of an Inundated Ohio Hopewell Mortuary-Ceremonial Site in North-Central Ohio. North American Archaeologist 28:189–232.Google Scholar
Redmond, Brian G. 2016 Connecting Heaven and Earth: Interpreting Early Woodland Nonmortuary Ceremonialism in Northern Ohio. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 41:41–66.Google Scholar
Redmond, Brian G., and Scanlan, Brian L. 2011 A Report of Archaeological Investigations at the Heckleman Site (33Er14): 2010 Season. Archaeological Reports 159. Cleveland Museum of Natural History, Cleveland, Ohio.Google Scholar
Redmond, Brian G., and Scanlan, Brian L. 2013 A Report of Archaeological Investigations at the Heckleman Site (33Er14): 2012 Season. Archaeological Reports 162. Cleveland Museum of Natural History, Cleveland, Ohio.Google Scholar
Reid, Kenneth C. 1976 Prehistoric Trade in the Lower Missouri Valley: An Analysis of Middle Woodland Bladelets. In Hopewellian Archaeology in the Lower Missouri River Valley, edited by Johnson, Alfred E., pp. 63–99. Publication in Anthropology No. 8. University of Kansas, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Reimer, Paula J., Bard, Edouard, Bayliss, Alex, Beck, J. Warren, Blackwell, Paul G., Ramsey, Christopher Bronk, Buck, Caitlin E., Cheng, Hai, Edwards, R. Lawrence, Friedrich, Michael, Grootes, Pieter M., Guilderson, Thomas P., Haflidason, Haflidi, Hajdas, Irka, Hatté, Christine, Heaton, Timothy J., Hoffmann, Dirk L., Hogg, Alan G., Hughen, Konrad A., Kaiser, K. Felix, Kromer, Bernd, Manning, Sturt W., Niu, Mu, Reimer, Ron W., Richards, David A., Scott, E. Marian, Southon, John R., Staff, Richard A., Turney, Christian S. M., and van der Plicht, Johannes 2013 IntCal13 and Marine13 Radiocarbon Age Calibration Curves 0–50,000 Years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55:1869–1887.Google Scholar
Richner, Jeffrey J., and Bauermeister, Ann C. 2009 An Archaeological Inventory and Assessment of 14 Archaeological Sites in the Evertt Area, Boston Township, Summit County, Ohio. Midwest Archeological Center, Technical Report 113. Lincoln, Nebraska.Google Scholar
Riordan, Robert V. 1995 A Construction Sequence for a Middle Woodland Hilltop Enclosure. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 20:62–104.Google Scholar
Riordan, Robert V. 1996 The Enclosed Hilltops of Southern Ohio. In A View from the Core: A Synthesis of Ohio Hopewell Archaeology, edited by Pacheco, Paul, pp. 242–256. Ohio Archaeological Council, Columbus.Google Scholar
Riordan, Robert V. 2011 Report on the Excavations of the Moorehead Circle at Fort Ancient, 2008–09. Reports in Anthropology 11. Wright State University Laboratory of Anthropology, Dayton, Ohio.Google Scholar
Ruby, Bret J., and Lynott, Mark J. 2009 Hopewellian Centers in Context: Investigations in and around the Hopeton Earthworks. In In the Footprints of Squier and Davis: Archaeological Fieldwork in Ross County, Ohio, edited by Lynott, Mark, pp. 109–124. Special Report No. 5. Midwest Archeological Center, Lincoln, Nebraska.Google Scholar
Schweikart, John F., Church, Flora, and Ericksen, Annette 1997 The Results of Data Recovery at 33 PE 361 and 33 PE 362 for the Proposed Gas Pipeline through Portions of Fairfield, Perry, Muskingum, and Noble Counties, Ohio. Submitted to the Department of Energy. Copies available from the State Historic Preservation Office–Ohio History Connection, Columbus.Google Scholar
Seeman, Mark F. 1979 Feasting with the Dead: Ohio Hopewell Charnel House Ritual as a Context for Redistribution. In Hopewell Archaeology: The Chillicothe Conference, edited by Brose, David S. and Greber, N'omi B., pp. 39–46. Kent State University Press, Kent, Ohio.Google Scholar
Seeman, Mark F. 1996 The Ohio Hopewell Core and Its Many Margins: Deconstructing Upland and Hinterland Relations. In A View from the Core: A Synthesis of Ohio Hopewell Archaeology, edited by Pacheco, Paul, pp. 304–315. Ohio Archaeological Council, Columbus.Google Scholar
Sieg, Lauren E., and Hollinger, R. Eric 2005 Learning from the Past: The History of Ohio Hopewell Taxonomy and Its Implications for Archaeological Practice. In Woodland Period Systematics in the Middle Ohio Valley, edited by Applegate, Darlene and Mainfort, Robert, pp. 120–133. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Stothers, David M., Pratt, D. Michael, and Shane, Orrin C. III 1979 The Western Basin Middle Woodland: Non-Hopewellians in a Hopewellian World. In Hopewell Archaeology: The Chillicothe Conference, edited by Brose, David S. and Greber, N'omi B., pp. 47–58. Kent State University Press, Kent, Ohio.Google Scholar
Struever, Stuart 1964 The Hopewell Interaction Sphere in Riverine–Western Great Lakes Culture History. In Hopewellian Studies, edited by Caldwell, Joseph and Hall, Robert L., pp. 86–106. Scientific Papers 12. Illinois State Museum, Springfield.Google Scholar
Taché, Karine, and Hart, John P. 2013 Chronometric Hygiene of Radiocarbon Databases for Early Durable Cooking Vessel Technologies in Northeastern North America. American Antiquity 78:359–372.Google Scholar
Thomas, Cyrus 1894 Report of the Mound Explorations of the Bureau of American Ethnology. Annual Report 12. Bureau of American Ethnology, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Volf, William J. 2000 The Szalay Site: Hopewellian Occupation in Northeastern Ohio. Master's thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln.Google Scholar
Walthall, John A. 1985 Early Hopewellian Ceremonial Encampments in the South Appalachian Highlands. In Structure and Process in Southeastern Archaeology, edited by Dickens, Roy S. and Ward, H. Trawick, pp. 243–262. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Weller, Ryan 2008 Phase III Data Recovery at 33 FR 561 within the Columbus Southerly Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion Area Hamilton Township, Franklin County, Ohio. Copies available from the State Historic Preservation Office–Ohio History Connection, Columbus.Google Scholar
Weller, Ryan, Burks, Jarrod, and Burcham, James 1999 Phase II Cultural Resources Management Assessment of Sites 33 FR 1520 and 33 FR 1521 in Plain Township, Franklin County, Ohio. Submitted to the US Army Corps of Engineers. Copies available from the State Historic Preservation Office–Ohio History Connection, Columbus.Google Scholar
Weymouth, John, Bevan, Bruce, and Dalan, Renita 2009 Geophysical Investigations at the Hopeton Earthworks. In In the Footprints of Squier and Davis: Archaeological Fieldwork in Ross County, Ohio, edited by Lynott, Mark, pp. 145–158. Special Report No. 5. Midwest Archeological Center, Lincoln, Nebraska.Google Scholar
Willey, Gordon R., and Phillips, Phillip 1958 Method and Theory in American Archaeology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Willey, Gordon R., and Sabloff, Jeremy 1993 A History of American Archaeology. 3rd ed. Thames and Hudson, London.Google Scholar
Wilmhurst, Janet M., Hunt, Terry L., Lipo, Carl P., and Anderson, Atholl J. 2011 High-Precision Radiocarbon Dating Shows Recent and Rapid Initial Human Colonization of East Polynesia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 108:1815–1820.Google Scholar
Wright, Alice 2014 History, Monumentality, and Interaction in the Appalachian Summit Middle Woodland. American Antiquity 79:277–294.Google Scholar
Yerkes, Richard W. 1990 Using Microwear Analysis to Investigate Domestic Activities and Craft Specialization at the Murphy Site, a Small Hopewell Settlement in Licking County, Ohio. In The Interpretive Possibilities of Microwear Analysis, edited by Gräslund, Bo, Knutson, Helena, Knutson, Kjel, and Taffinder, Jacqueline, pp. 167–176. Societas Archaeologica Upsaliensis, Aun 14. Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
Yerkes, Richard W. 1994 A Consideration of the Function of Ohio Hopewell Bladelets. Lithic Technology 19:109–127.Google Scholar
Yerkes, Richard W. 2002 Hopewell Tribes: A Study of Middle Woodland Social Organization in the Ohio Valley. In The Archaeology of Tribal Societies, edited by Parkinson, William, pp. 227–245. Archaeological Series 15. International Monographs in Prehistory, Ann Arbor, Michigan.Google Scholar
Yerkes, Richard W. 2003 Ideology and Social Organization in Ohio Hopewell Societies. Wisconsin Archaeologist 84:15–19.Google Scholar
Yerkes, Richard W. 2009 Microwear Analysis of a Sample of 100 Chipped Stone Artifacts from the 1971–1977 Excavations at the Seip Earthworks. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 34:109–121.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Image

Miller supplementary material

Miller supplementary material 1

Download Miller supplementary material(Image)
Image 50.9 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Miller supplementary material

Miller supplementary material 2

Download Miller supplementary material(Image)
Image 65.2 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Miller supplementary material

Miller supplementary material 3

Download Miller supplementary material(Image)
Image 70 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Miller supplementary material

Miller supplementary material 4

Download Miller supplementary material(Image)
Image 91.4 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Miller supplementary material

Miller supplementary material 5

Download Miller supplementary material(Image)
Image 77.1 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Miller supplementary material

Miller supplementary material 6

Download Miller supplementary material(Image)
Image 46.2 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Miller supplementary material

Miller supplementary material 7

Download Miller supplementary material(Image)
Image 68 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Miller supplementary material

Miller supplementary material 8

Download Miller supplementary material(Image)
Image 83.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Miller supplementary material

Miller supplementary material 9

Download Miller supplementary material(File)
File 16.8 KB
Supplementary material: File

Miller supplementary material

Miller supplementary material 10

Download Miller supplementary material(File)
File 14.8 KB