Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:55:34.702Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comment on Nico Krisch, “The Decay of Consent: International Law in an Age of Global Public Goods”

Part of: Nico Krisch, “The Decay of Consent: International Law in an Age of Global Public Goods”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Eyal Benvenisti  and
George W. Downs
Eyal Benvenisti
Affiliation:
Tel Aviv University Faculty of Law
George W. Downs
Affiliation:
New York University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In his recent article, Nico Krisch joins an increasing number of scholars who worry about the “turn toward nonconsensual structures” in international lawmaking. Although the article is primarily descriptive and does not set out to offer either a rigorous explanation or a normative assessment of this trend, Krisch does suggest that the trend “reflects the fact that the need for greater cooperation [at the global level] . . . is not always, or not even typically, satisfied by international law.” It also gives voice to the concern that the move to informal institutions “point[s] in the direction of more hierarchical forms of governance” that increasingly cater to a small number of powerful states, rather than to the traditional, broad, consent-based order.

Type
Symposium: Nico Krisch, “The Decay of Consent: International Law in an Age of Global Public Goods”
Information
AJIL Unbound , Volume 108 , 2014 , pp. 1 - 3
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2014

References

1 Krisch, Nico, The Decay of Consent: International law in an Age of Global Public Goods, 108 AJIL 1 (2014)Google Scholar.

2 Pauwelyn, Joost Et Al., Informal International Lawmaking (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Benvenisti, Eyal & Downs, George W., The Empire’s New Clothes: Political Economy and the Fragmentation of International Law, 60 Stan. L. Rev. 595 (2007)Google Scholar.

4 Weiler, J.H.H., The Geology of International Law – Governance, Democracy and Legitimacy, 64 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 547 (2004) (Ger.)Google Scholar.

5 Krisch, Nico, International Law in Times of Hegemony: Unequal Power and the Shaping of the International Legal Order, 16 Eur. J. Int’l L 369 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar and see also Stephan, Paul B., Symmetry and Selectivity: What Happens in International Law When the World Changes, 10 Chi. J. Int’l L. 91 (2009)Google Scholar.

6 National Security Council, The National Security Strategy: IX. Transform America’s National Security Institutions to meet the Challenges and Opportunities of the 21st Century (2006)Google Scholar.

7 National Security Council, The National Security Strategy: X. Engage the Opportunities and Confront the Challenges of Globalization (2006)Google Scholar.

8 Office of the United States Trade Representative, Trans-Pacific Partnership (2014)Google Scholar.

9 Joost, Pauwelyn et al., When Structures Become Shackles: Stagnation and Dynamics in International Lawmaking, 25 Eur. J. Int’l L. 733 (2014)Google Scholar.