No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Comment on ‘Importance of real-time measurement of sperm head morphology in intracytoplasmic sperm injection’ by Fumiaki Itoi et al.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2023
Summary
We present a commentary on the article published in the Zygote FirstView: ‘Importance of real-time measurement of sperm head morphology in intracytoplasmic sperm injection’ by Fumiaki Itoi and colleagues. We comment on the importance of providing the microscope setup details whenever sperm morphology visualization is discussed. The claim of ×6000–10,000 magnification is misleading as such levels of magnification are impossible to achieve.
- Type
- Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
De Vos, A., Van de Velde, H., Bocken, G., Eylenbosch, G., Franceus, N., Meersdom, G., Tistaert, S., Vankelecom, A., Tournaye, H. and Verheyen, G. (2013). Does intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection improve embryo development? A randomized sibling-oocyte study. Human Reproduction, 28(3), 617–626. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des435
CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Itoi, F., Miyamoto, T., Himaki, T., Honnma, H., Sano, M. and Ueda, J. (2022). Importance of real-time measurement of sperm head morphology in intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Zygote, 30(1), 9–16. doi: 10.1017/S0967199421000307
CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lukaszuk, K., Pastuszek, E. and Samojedny, A. (2016). Comment on: ‘Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI) does not improve outcome in patients with two successive IVF-ICSI failures’ by Gatimel et al. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 33(9), 1253–1254. doi: 10.1007/s10815-016-0746-9
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilding, M., Coppola, G., di Matteo, L., Palagiano, A., Fusco, E. and Dale, B. (2011). Intracytoplasmic injection of morphologically selected spermatozoa (IMSI) improves outcome after assisted reproduction by deselecting physiologically poor quality spermatozoa. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 28(3), 253–262. doi: 10.1007/s10815-010-9505-5
CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed