Introduction
Since 65000–50000 years ago—the currently accepted earliest date range for human entry into Australia and New Guinea (Veth Reference Veth2017)—one third of the continental land mass has been drowned by post-glacial sea-level rise (Figure 1). Based on work being conducted in other parts of the world, there is good reason to suppose that this drowned territory offered attractive resources for human occupation, and that some palaeoenvironmental and archaeological features of this landscape have survived inundation and can be retrieved by underwater exploration (Benjamin et al. Reference Benjamin, Bonsall, Pickard and Fischer2011; Evans et al. Reference Evans, Flemming and Flatman2014; Bailey et al. Reference Bailey, Harff and Sakellariou2017). Relatively little underwater exploration has so far taken place in Australia. Yet investigations of this type are particularly important here, given that the earliest human colonisation happened during a period when landfall and the earliest processes of settlement and dispersal must have first occurred in coastal territory that is now inundated (Nutley Reference Nutley, Evans, Flemming and Flatman2014; Ward et al. Reference Ward, Larcombe and Veth2015). This project is the first in Australia to explore systematically the drowned continental shelf, and to integrate the resulting data with the existing on-land terrestrial record of human occupation, using a full range of acoustic, imaging, geoarchaeological and archaeological techniques.
Location
Our main target area is the Pilbara coast of north-western Australia, near the town of Karratha. Here, a number of existing sources of information make a promising basis for more detailed offshore explorations. A 50000-year onshore record of terrestrial occupation, including shelf-edge rockshelters on Barrow Island, offers indirect indications concerning the use of the now submerged landscape (Veth et al. Reference Veth, Aplin, Wallis, Manne, Pulsford, White and Chappell2007, Reference Veth, Ward, Manne, Ulm, Ditchfield, Dortch, Hook, Petchey, Hogg, Questiaux, Demuro, Arnold, Spooner, Levchenko, Skippington, Byrne, Basgal, Zeanah, Belton, Helmholz, Bajkan, Bailey, Placzek and Kendrick2017; Ward et al. Reference Ward, Larcombe and Veth2015). Palaeoenvironmental evidence also indicates a higher tidal range and greater estuarine productivity from at least 40000 years ago onwards, when compared to present-day conditions. Thus, marine resources would certainly have been available for exploitation, at least periodically, on now submerged shorelines (Ward et al. Reference Ward, Larcombe and Veth2015; Veth et al. Reference Veth, Ward, Manne, Ulm, Ditchfield, Dortch, Hook, Petchey, Hogg, Questiaux, Demuro, Arnold, Spooner, Levchenko, Skippington, Byrne, Basgal, Zeanah, Belton, Helmholz, Bajkan, Bailey, Placzek and Kendrick2017). High-resolution bathymetry is already available over some parts of the shelf, showing submerged shorelines and other relict features of the ancient landscape (Brooke et al. Reference Brooke, Nichols, Huang and Beaman2017), along with satellite imagery indicating stone fish-traps close to the present shoreline. Early stone fish-traps (Figure 2), Holocene mounded shell-midden sites (Figure 3) and many thousands of rock engravings on the present-day coast (Figure 4) provide a basis for predictive modelling of underwater archaeological remains (McDonald & Veth Reference McDonald and Veth2009; Ward et al. Reference Ward, Larcombe, Mulvaney and Fandry2013). There is also a substantial body of Indigenous knowledge about this ‘sea country’ throughout coastal Australia, including memories of now inundated traditional land (Bradley Reference Bradley2010; Nunn & Reid Reference Nunn and Reid2016).
Methodology
The project will take a staged approach to the exploration of the underwater landscape, including innovative techniques previously untested in archaeological investigations. These include the use of high-resolution airborne topographic and bathymetric LiDAR to produce a seamless terrain model of the surface topography onshore and offshore, and the analysis of an underwater shell midden in Denmark to develop an understanding of the acoustic and geoarchaeological signals associated with this type of deposit. The Pilbara research will be conducted in collaboration with traditional owners represented by Murujuga Aboriginal Corporation and the Australian Research Council Linkage Project, ‘Murujuga: Dynamics of the Dreaming’.
The first step is to compile information on known onshore archaeological sites in the Pilbara region, their palaeoenvironmental and topographic associations, and to examine existing offshore marine survey data. This will be amplified using airborne survey combining bathymetric LiDAR equipment capable of achieving sub-0.5m scale mapping to water depths of approximately 10m, and high-resolution topographic LiDAR and stereo-imaging cameras. The objective here is to provide a detailed understanding of known onshore archaeological sites in their topographic and landscape setting, and to develop a preliminary understanding of the offshore bathymetry and underwater features of potential archaeological and palaeoenvironmental significance.
A second step is the analysis of the underwater archaeological shell midden of Hjarnø in Denmark, one of the few such middens known to exist anywhere in the world. Previous excavation established this to be a midden of the classic Ertebølle culture (approximately 8000 years old), associated with gjytta (peat deposits), a hearth area enclosed within the shell remains, flint and antler artefacts, food remains (including bones of fish, land mammals and marine mollusc shells), and wooden artefacts, including remains of a log boat and decorated wooden paddles (Figure 5) (Skriver et al. Reference Skriver, Borup, Astrup, Bailey, Harff and Sakellariou2017). The objective at Hjarnø is to combine coring and new excavation of the submerged archaeological deposits and their associated sediments with geophysical survey using sidescan sonar and high-resolution three-dimensional bathymetry. Thus, we intend to establish the acoustic and geoarchaeological signals associated with submerged and buried midden deposits (Figure 6). We expect the results of this work to feed into the search for underwater archaeological material in the Pilbara region, and to be of global interest and relevance to underwater research.
A third step is to locate and map potential underwater targets in the Pilbara region, initially in the intertidal zone and then farther offshore. Targets of particular interest are submerged shorelines, coastal dunes, estuarine and tidal river channels, cliff lines, rock overhangs and identifiable upstanding stone features, such as fish traps and hut foundations—the latter known from archaeological research on land. Survey will be conducted initially with sidescan sonar at coarse resolution to identify targets. Subsequent survey will use high-resolution sidescan and three-dimensional multibeam bathymetry, followed by ground-truthing using a stereo-drop camera, hand and gravity coring, divers (where appropriate) and collection of sediment samples for geochemical, micropalaeontological and dating analyses.
Expected outcomes
This research will provide: a) the first detailed modelling of an underwater archaeological landscape in Australia; b) a morphometric and marine geophysical template for the identification of key cultural features, including the development of a Danish model for the prospection and identification of submerged shell middens; c) the basis for comparison with similar research being conducted elsewhere in the world. The research will also promote investigation more generally of the underwater archaeology associated with ‘Sea country’ traditions.
Acknowledgements
The project is supported by the Australian Research Council's Discovery Projects funding scheme (DP170100812), with additional support from the ARC Dynamics of the Dreaming Linkage (LP140100393), Flinders University and the Hackett Foundation of Adelaide.
In the above article, Western Australia was incorrectly capitalised as western Australia. The article has been updated online with the correct capitalisation throughout.