Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T23:29:20.325Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

FERDINANDO GALIANI’S NEWTONIAN SOCIAL MATHEMATICS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2020

Rosario Patalano
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The evolution of Ferdinando Galiani’s thought toward social mathematic has been neglected by scholars, and his attempt to establish political arguments on the analytical basis remains unexplored. The non-systematic nature of Galiani’s intuitions, due to his laziness, largely justifies this underestimation of his scientific program. This paper intends to show that the mature abbé Galiani follows an intellectual itinerary autonomous and parallel to that followed by Marquis de Condorcet in the same years. The anti-Physiocratique querelle represents Galiani’s methodological maturation. In contrast with Physiocratic economic doctrine, based on the primacy of deductive methodology, Galiani claims for economic science the realism of circumstance against aprioristic axiomatic hypotheses and rationalist generalizations. Galiani’s project, substantially similar to Marquis de Condorcet’s approach to social science, can be defined as Newtonian social mathematics opposed to Physiocratic Cartesian social mathematics.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , September 2020 , pp. 357 - 383
Copyright
© The History of Economics Society 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Rosario Patalano, University of Naples Federico II; e-mail: [email protected]. I am especially grateful to anonymous referees and to the editor Jimena Hurtado. The usual disclaimers apply.

References

REFERENCES

Alengry, Frank. 1904. Condorcet: Guide de la Révolution française, théoricien du droit constitutionnel et précurseur de la science sociale. Paris: V. Girard et E. Briere.Google Scholar
Allix, Edgard. 1911. “Le physicisme des physiocrates.” Revue d’économie politique XXV: 563–586.Google Scholar
Amodeo, Federico. 1924. Vita matematica napoletana. Napoli: Giannini.Google Scholar
Amodio, Paolo. 1997. Il disincanto della ragione e l’assolutezza del bonheur. Studio sull’abate Galian. Napoli: Guida Editore.Google Scholar
Argemíd’Abadal, Lluis. 2012. “The Physiocrats.” In Backhaus, Jürgen Georg, ed., Handbook of the History of Economic Thought: Insights on the Founders of Modern Economics. New York: Springer, pp. 137–160.Google Scholar
Baker, Keith Michael. 1975. Condorcet from Natural Philosophy to Social Mathematics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Belaval, Yvon. 1952. “La crise de la géométrisation de l’univers dans la philosophie des Lumières.” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 6, 21 (3): 337–355.Google Scholar
Baron, E. Margaret. 1969. The Origins of Infinitesimal Calculus. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Backhaus, Jürgen Georg, ed. 2011. Physiocracy, Antiphysiocracy and Pfeiffer. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beer, Max. 1939. An Inquiry into Physiocracy. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Benetti, Carlo. 1994. “Troc, bons d’achat et monnaie: la conception de Ferdinando Galiani.” Revue économique 45: 1177–1188.Google Scholar
Béraud, Alan, and Faccarello, Gilbert. 1993. Nouvelle histoire de la pensée économique. Volume I, Des Scolastiques au classiques. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Bianchini, Marco. 2002. Bonheur public et méthode géométrique: enquête sur les économistes italiens (1711–1803). Paris: Ined.Google Scholar
Bourthoumieux, Charles. 1935. Le mythe de l’ordre naturel en économie politique depuis Quesnay. Paris: M. Rivière.Google Scholar
Brockdorff, Cay von. 1937. “Descartes et les Lumières Françaises.” Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 44, 1 (Jan.): 305–324.Google Scholar
Brooks, Garland P., and Aalto, Sergei K.. 1981. “The Rise and Fall of Moral Algebra: Francis Hutcheson and the Mathematization of Psychology.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 17, 3 (July): 343–356.10.1002/1520-6696(198107)17:3<343::AID-JHBS2300170306>3.0.CO;2-83.0.CO;2-8>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunet, Pierre. 1931. L’introduction des théories de Newton en France au dix-huitième siècle. Volume 1. Paris: Blanchard.Google Scholar
Bruni, Luigino, and Porta, Pier Luigi. 2003. “Economia Civile and Pubblica Felicità in the Italian Enlightenment.” In “Oeconomies on the Age of Newton.” Edited by Schabas, Margaret and de Marchi, Neil. Suppl. 1, History of Political Economy 35: 361–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buffon, Georges Louis Leclerc de. 1749. “Premier discours de la manière d’étudier & de traiter l’histoire naturelle.” In Histoire naturelle générale et particulière. First edition. Volume I. Paris: Imprimerie Royale, pp. 1–64.Google Scholar
Buffon, Georges Louis Leclerc de. 1777. “Essais d’Arithmetique Morale, Histoire Naturale.” Supplement, Histoire naturelle, générale et particulière, servant de suite à l’Histoire naturelle de l’Homme 4. Paris: Imprimerie Royale, pp. 146–148.Google Scholar
Burlingame, Anne Elizabeth. 1930. Condorcet, the Torch Bearer of the French Revolution. Boston: The Stratford Company.Google Scholar
Cane, Edric, and Hankins, Thomas L.. 1976. “Jean d’Alembert between Descartes and Newton: A Critique of Thomas L. Hankins’ Position. ” Isis 67, 2 (June): 274–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casini, Paolo. 1983. “Newton in Italia, 1700–1740: note di ricerca.” In Newton e la coscienza europea. Bologna: Il Mulino, pp. 173–227.Google Scholar
Casini, Paolo. 1988. “Newton’s ‘Principia’ and the Philosophers of the Enlightenment.” “Newton’s ‘Principia’ and Its Legacy,” Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London 42, 1 (Jan.): 35–52.Google Scholar
Cesarano, Filippo. 1976. “Monetary Theory in Ferdinando Galiani’s Della Moneta.” History of Political Economy 8 (3): 380–399.10.1215/00182702-8-3-380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cesarano, Filippo. 1983. “The Rational Expectations Hypothesis in Retrospect.” The American Economic Review 73, 1 (March): 198–203.Google Scholar
Cesarano, Filippo. 1986. “La teoria della politica economica nei Dialogues di Ferdinando Galiani.” Rivista di politica economica 12: 1691–1706.Google Scholar
Cesarano, Filippo. 1995. “Galiani e il ruolo della politica economica.” In Roncaglia, Alessandra, ed., Alle origini del pensiero economico in Italia. Bologna: Il Mulino, pp. 97–119.Google Scholar
Cesarano, Filippo. 1999. “Introduzione.” In Galiani, Ferdinando, Scritti di Politica Economica. Lanciano: Rocco Carabba, pp. vii–xlix.Google Scholar
Charles, Loïc. 2000. “From the Encyclopédie to the Tableau économique: Quesnay on Freedom of Grain Trade and Economic Growth.” The European Journal of History of Economic Thought 7 (1): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, Loïc. 2003. “The Visual History of the Tableau Économique.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 10 (4): 527–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, Loïc. 2004. “The Tableau Économique as Rational Recreation.” History of Political Economy 36 (3): 445–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, Loïc. 2015. “Figures of Mockery. The Cultural Disqualification of Physiocracy (1760–1790).” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 22 (3): 383–419.Google Scholar
Charles, Loïc, and Théré, Christine. 2007. “François Quesnay: A Rural Socrates in Versailles?” History of Political Economy 38: 195–214.Google Scholar
Charles, Loïc, and Théré, Christine. 2015. “Jeux de mots, Narrative and Economic Writing: The Rhetoric of Anti-physiocracy in French Economic Periodicals (1764–1769).” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 22 (3): 359–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Bernard, I. 1956. Franklin and Newton: An Inquiry into Speculative Newtonian Experimental Science and Franklin’s Work in Electricity as an Example Thereof. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
Cohen, Bernard, I. 1971. Introduction to Isaac Newton’s “Principia.” Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Condorcet, Marie Jean Antoine Nicolas de Caritat, marquis de. [1769] 1849. “Discours de Réception à l’Académie.” In Œuvres de Condorcet. Volume I. Paris: Firmin Didot, pp. 389–415.Google Scholar
Condorcet, Marie Jean Antoine Nicolas de Caritat, marquis de. 1774. Lettres sur le commerce des grains. Paris: Couturier Père.Google Scholar
Condorcet, Marie Jean Antoine Nicolas de Caritat, marquis de. [1793] 1994. Tableau général de la science qui a pour objet l’application du calcul aux sciences politiques et morales. English translation: Foundations of Social Choice and Political Theory. Translated and edited by McLean, Iain and Ewitt, Fiona. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Condorcet, Marie Jean Antoine Nicolas de Caritat, marquis de. 1994. Arithmétique politique. Textes rares ou inédits (1767–1789). Edition critique commentée by Bru, B. and Crépel, P.. Paris: Presse Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Costabile, Lilia. 2016. “The Value and Security of Money: Metallic and Fiduciary Media in Ferdinando Galiani’s Della moneta.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 23 (3): 400–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cremaschi, Sergio. 1981. “Adam Smith, Newtonianism and Political Economy.” Manuscrito V (1): 117–134.Google Scholar
Cremaschi, Sergio. 1989. “Adam Smith: Skeptical Newtonianism, Disenchanted Republicanism, and the Birth of Social Science.” In Dascal, Marcelo and Gruengard, Ora, eds., Knowledge and Politics: Case Studies in the Relationship Between Epistemology and Political Philosophy. Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 83–110.Google Scholar
Cremaschi, Sergio. 2000. “Legge di Natura e Scienza Economica.” Quaderni storici, Nuova Serie, Etiche economiche 35, 105 (3): 697–730.Google Scholar
Crépel, Pierre, and Gilain, Christian, eds. 1989. Condorcet: mathématicien, économiste, philosophe, homme politique. Paris: Minerve.Google Scholar
Crépel, Pierre, and Rieucau, Jean-Nicolas. 2005. “Condorcet’s Social Mathematics: A Few Tables.” Social Choice and Welfare 25 (2/3): 243–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
d’Alembert, Jean-Baptiste Le Rond. 1743. Traité de dynamique. Paris: David.Google Scholar
d’Alembert, Jean-Baptiste Le Rond. [1751] 1995. Preliminary Discourse to the Encyclopaedia of Diderot. English translation by Schwab, Richard N. with the collaboration of Rex, Walter E.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Davison, Rosena. 1988. “Diderot, Galiani et Vico: un itinéraire philosophique.” Diderot Studies 23: 39–53.Google Scholar
Vecchio, Del, Gustavo, . 1956. Vecchie e nuove teorie economiche. Torino: Utet.Google Scholar
Demaria, Giovanni. 1972. “La scienza politica di Ferdinando Galiani.” Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia, Nuova Serie 31, 9/10 (Sept.–Oct.): 624–677.Google Scholar
Demeter, Tamás. 2014. “Enlarging the Bounds of Moral Philosophy: Newton’s Method and Hume’s Science of Man.” In Biener, Zvi and Schliesser, Eric, eds., Newton and Empiricism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz, Furio, and Guerci, Luciano. 1975. “Introduzione alle Opere di Ferdinando Galani.” In Galiani, Ferdinando, Opere. Letteratura Italiana. Storia e testi. Napoli/Milano: Ricciardi, pp. ix–cvi.Google Scholar
Diderot, Denis. [1761] 1875. “Sur Deux Mémoires de d’Alembert L’un concernant le calcul des probabilités, l’autre l’inoculation.” In Assézat, J. and Tourneux, Maurice, eds., Œuvres complètes de Diderot : revues sur les éditions originales…. Etude sur Diderot et le mouvement philosophique au XVIIIe siècle. Volume 9. Paris: Garnier, pp. 193–212.Google Scholar
Diderot, Denis. 1963. “Apologie de l’abbé Galiani.” In Diderot, D., Oeuvres politiques, edited by Verniére, P.. Paris: Garnier, pp. 59–124.Google Scholar
Diemer, Arnaud, and Guillemin, Hervé. 2013. “La naissance de l’économie politique ou la fascination des penseurs de la société pour la physique.” Triangle, ISH Lyon, Séminaire Economie Politique, 15 avril 2013. Available online: http://www.oeconomia.net/private/recherche/diemer-guillemin-triangle-avril2013.pdf. Accessed May 2019.Google Scholar
Dixit, Avinash. 1996. The Making of Economic Policy: A Transaction-Cost Politics Perspective. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doria, Paolo Mattia. 1722–1726. Delle opere matematiche di Paolo Mattia Doria. Venezia: n.p.Google Scholar
Du Pont de Nemours, Pierre Samuel. 1768a. Physiocratie, ou Constitution naturelle du gouvernement le plus avantageux au genre humain. Paris: Merlin.Google Scholar
Du Pont de Nemours, Pierre Samuel. 1768b. De l’origine et des progrès d’une science nouvelle. Paris: Chez Desaint.Google Scholar
Einaudi, Luigi. [1945] 1953. “Galiani economista.” In Einaudi, L., Saggi bibliografici e storici intorno alle dottrine economiche. Roma: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, pp. 269–305.Google Scholar
Euler, Leonhard. 1748. Introductio in Analysin Infinitorum. Lausannae: apud Marcum Michaelem Bousquet et socios.Google Scholar
Eusepi, Giuseppe. 1992. “Galiani teorico del valore soggettivo.” In Acocella, N., Rey, G. M., and Tiberi, M., eds., Saggi di politica economica in onore di Federico Caffé. Milano: Angeli, pp. 93–118.Google Scholar
Faccarello, Gilbert. 1994. “Nil repente!: Galiani and Necker on Economic Reforms.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 1 (3): 519–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faccarello, Gilbert. 1998. “Galiani, Necker and Turgot: A Debate on Economic Reform and Policy in 18th-Century France.” In Faccarello, G., ed., Studies in the History of French Political Economy: From Bodin to Walras. London: Routledge, pp. 120–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Jaqueline. 2005. “Condorcet et la Mathematique Sociale: Enthousiasmes et Bemols.” Mathematics and Social Sciences 43, 172 (4): 7–41.Google Scholar
Ferrone, Vincenzo. 1995. The Intellectual Root of the Italian Enlightenment: Newtonian Science, Religion, and Politics in the Early Eighteenth Century. San Jose: Humanity Press.Google Scholar
Fischman, Marianne. 1998. “Le concept quesnayen d’ordre naturel.” Cahiers d’économie politique 32: 67–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, Vernard. 1973. “An Origin to the Tableau Oeconomique.” History of Political Economy 5: 121 –150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, Vernard. 1976. The Social Physics of Adam Smith. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
Forbonnais, François Veron Duverger de. 1767. Principes et observations œconomiques. Volume 2, Observations oeconomiques sur divers points du sisteme de l’auteur du Tableau oeconomique. Amsterdam: chez Marc Michel Rey, parts 3 and 4.Google Scholar
Fox-Genovese, Elizabeth Ann. 1976. The Origins of Physiocracy: Economic Revolution and Social Order in Eighteenth-Century France. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Frisi, Paolo. [1763] 1958. “Elogio del Galileo.” In Venturi, Franco, Illuministi italiani. Riformatori lombardi, piemontesi e toscani. Milano/Napoli: Ricciardi., pp. 329–339.Google Scholar
Galasso, Giuseppe. 1989. “Galileo e la cultura napoletana.” In La filosofia in soccorso de’ governi. Napoli: Guida, pp. 69–111.Google Scholar
Galiani, Ferdinando. 1751. Della Moneta. Libri cinque (On Money). Napoli: Raimondi.Google Scholar
Galiani, Ferdinando. 1770. Dialogues sur le commerce des bleds (Dialogues on Grain Trade). Paris: Merlin.Google Scholar
Galiani, Ferdinando. [1770] 1979. “L’intérêt géneral de l’État ou La liberté du commerce des bleds démontrée conforme au droit naturel; au droit public de la France; aux lois fondamentales du Royaume; à l’intérêt commun du souverain et de ses sujets dans tous les temps; avec la réfutation d’un nouveau système de bagarre publié en forme de feu d’artifice, par M.L.A.R. economiste indigne.” In Kaplan, S. L., ed., La Bagarre: Galiani’s “Lost Parody.” The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 65–116.Google Scholar
Galiani, Ferdinando. [1773] 1999. Sull’annona di Genova. In Cesarano, F., ed., Scritti di politica economica. Lanciano: Rocco Carabba, pp. 69–74.Google Scholar
Galiani, Ferdinando. 1780. Della Moneta. Libri cinque. Edizione Seconda. Napoli: Stampeia Simoniana.Google Scholar
Galiani, Ferdinando. 1782. De’ doveri de’ principi neutrali verso i principi guerreggianti: e di questi verso i neutrali. Libre due (On Duties of Neutral Princes towards Warring Princes and of these towards Neutral). Napoli, n.p.Google Scholar
Galiani, Ferdinando. 1881. Correspondance. Edited by Pérey, Lucien [Luce Herpin] and Gaston Maugras. Volume II. Paris: Calmann-Lévy.Google Scholar
Galiani, Ferdinando. 1959. Dialogues sur le commerce des bleds. Giusta l’editio princeps del 1770 con appendici illustrative di Fausto Nicolini. Milano/Napoli: Ricciardi.Google Scholar
Galiani, Ferdinando. 1963. “Sullo stato della moneta ai tempi della guerra troiana.” In Galiani, Ferdinando, Della Moneta e scritti inediti. Edited by Merola, Alberto. Milano: Feltrinelli, pp. 351–379.Google Scholar
Galiani, Ferdinando. 1977. On Money. A Translation of Della Moneta by Ferdinado Galiani by Peter R. Toscano. Ann Arbor: University Microfilm International.Google Scholar
Garin, Eugenio. 2008. History of Italian Philosophy. Introduction by Pompa, Leon. Translated from Italian and edited by Pinton, Giorgio. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaudemet, Eugène. 1899. L’abbé Galiani et la question du commerce des blés à la fin du règne de Louis XV. Paris: Rousseau.Google Scholar
Genovesi, Antonio. 1745. Disputatio physico-historica de rerum corporearum origine et constitutione (Physico-historical debate on the origin and constitution of bodily objects). (Introduction to Musschenbroek, 1745). Neapoli: Petri Palumbo.Google Scholar
Genovesi, Antonio. 1766. Della Diceosina o sia filosofia del giusto e dell’onesto. Napoli: Stamperia Simoniana.Google Scholar
Genovesi, Antonio. 1765–1767. Delle lezioni di Commercio, o sia d’Economia civile, da leggersi nella Cattedra Intieriana. Volumes I–II. Napoli: Fratelli Simone.Google Scholar
Gilibert, Giorgio. 1977. Quesnay: La costruzione della macchina della ricchezza. Milano: Etas Libri.Google Scholar
Giocoli, Nicola. 1997. “La teoria dell’interesse di Ferdinando Galiani e l’ipotesi di Bernoulli: una grande occasione perduta?” Il pensiero economico italiano 5 (1): 7–37.Google Scholar
Giocoli, Nicola. 2001. “Value and Interest in Ferdinando Galiani’s Della Moneta.” History of Economic Ideas 9 (3): 95–135.Google Scholar
Goodman, Dena. 1994. The Republic of Letters: A Cultural History of the French Enlightenment. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Granger, Gilles-Gaston. 1956. La mathématique sociale du marquis de Condorcet. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Hamel, Christopher. 2019. “Diderot contre la physiocratie Une critique républicaine?” Revue d’histoire de la pensée économique 2 (8): 207–239.Google Scholar
Hasbach, Guillame. 1893. “Les fondements philosophiques de l’économie politique de Quesnay et de Smith.” Revue d’économie politique 3 (Sept.): 745–795.Google Scholar
Hecht, Jacqueline. 1958. “Le bicentenaire du Tableau économique: François Quesnay et la physiocratie. Présentation d’une publication de l’I.N.E.D.” Population 13 (2): 287–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgs, Henry. 1897. The Physiocrats: Six Lectures on the French Economists of the 18th Century. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hoselitz, Bert F. 1968. “Agrarian Capitalism, the Natural Order of Things: François Quesnay.” Kyklos 21: 637–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. 1748. Philosophical Essays Concerning Human Understanding. London: Millar.Google Scholar
Hume, David. 1752. Political Discourses by David Hume Esq. Second edition. Edinburgh: R. Fleming, for A. Kincaid and A. Donaldson.Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis. 1725. An Inquiry into the Original of Our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue. London: J. Darby.Google Scholar
Hutchison, Terence. 1988. Before Adam Smith: The Emergence of Political Economy 1662–1776. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ingrao, Bruna, and Israel, Giorgio. 1990. The Invisible Hand: Economic Equilibrium in the History of Science. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Intieri, Bartolomeo. 1754. Della perfetta conservazione del grano. Napoli: Raimondi.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Thomas E. 1980. “Politics and Political Economy in the Thought of the Ideologues.” History of Political Economy 12 (2): 141–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, Steven L. 1976. Bread, Politics and Political Economy in the Reign of Louis XV. Volume 1. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, Steven L.. 1979. La bagarre: Galiani’s “Lost” Parody. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, Steven L.. 2016. “Galiani: Grain and Governance.” In Kaplan, Steven L. and Reinert, Sophus A., eds., The Economic Turn: Recasting Political Economy in Eighteenth-Century Europe. London: Anthem Press, pp. 221–304.Google Scholar
Kauder, Emil. 1965. A History of Marginal Utility Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleiner, Israel. 1989. “Evolution of the Function Concept: A Brief Survey.” The College Mathematics Journal 20, 4 (September): 282–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klotz, Gérard. 2000. “La question des blés en France au dix-huitième siècle: Galiani, critique des physiocrates.” Il Pensiero Economico Italiano VIII (2): 147–183.Google Scholar
Koch, Philip. 1961. “The Genesis of Galiani’s Dialogues Sur Le Commerce Des Bles.” French Studies XV (4): 314–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krakeur, Lester G., and Krueger, Raymond L.. 1941. “The Mathematical Writings of Diderot.” Isis 33, 2 (June): 219–232.Google Scholar
Kubota, Akiteru. 1958. “Quesnay, disciple de Malebranche.” François Quesnay et la physiocratie. Volume 1. Paris: INED, pp. 169–196.Google Scholar
Laboulle, Marcel J. 1939. “La Mathématique sociale: Condorcet et ses prédécesseurs.” Revue d’Histoire littéraire de la France 46 (1/2): 33–55.Google Scholar
Larrère, Catherine. 1994. “Malebranche revisité: l’économie naturelle des physiocrates.” Dix-huitième Siècle 26: 117–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laval-Reviglio, Marie-Claire. 1987. “Les conceptions politiques des physiocrates.” Revue française de science politique 37 (2): 181–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. 1684. “Nova methodus pro maximis et minimis, itemque tangentibus, quae nec fractas nec irrationales quantitates moratur, et singulare pro illis calculigenus.” Acta Eruditorum (October): 467–473.Google Scholar
Le Mercier de La Rivière, Pierre P. F. J. H 1767. L’ordre naturel et essentiel des sociétés politiques. Paris: Geuthner.Google Scholar
Le Mercier de La Rivière, Pierre P. F. J. H.. 1770. L’intérêt général de l’État ou La liberté du commerce des bleds démontrée conforme au droit naturel; au droit public de la France; aux lois fondamentales du Royaume; à l’intérêt commun du souverain et de ses sujets dans tous les temps; avec la réfutation d’un nouveau système en forme de “Dialogues sur le commerce des bleds.” Paris: Desaint.Google Scholar
Le Trosne, Guillaume-François. 1766. “De l’utilité des discussions économiques.” Journal de l’agriculture, du commerce et des finances VI, Premier Partie (July): 8– 85.Google Scholar
Le Trosne, Guillaume-François. 1777. De l’ordre social, ouvrage suivi d’un traité élémentaire sur la valeur, l’argent, la circulation, l’industrie et le commerce intérieur et extérieur. Paris: chez les Frères Debure.Google Scholar
Lebrun, Pierre. 1962. “Réflexions méthodologiques sur l’histoire des théories et des doctrines économiques. La soidisant modernité de Ferdinando Galiani.” In Caroselli, M. R., ed., Studi in onore di Amintore Fanfani nel venticinquennio di cattedra universitaria. Volume VI. Milano: Giuffré, pp. 329 –335.Google Scholar
Luftalla, Michel. 1963. “L’évidence, fondement nécessaire et suffisant de l’ordre naturel chez Quesnay et Morelly.” Revue d’histoire économique et sociale 41 (2): 213–249.Google Scholar
Mazzone, Silvia, and Roero, Clara Silvia. 1997. Jacob Hermann and the Diffusion of the Leibnizian Calculus in Italy. Firenze: Leo S. Olschki.Google Scholar
Mazzotti, Massimo. 1998. “The Geometers of God: Mathematics and Reaction in the Kingdom of Naples.” Isis 89, 4 (Dec.): 674–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzotti, Massimo. 2013. “Il newtonianesimo e la scienza del Settecento.” In Clericuzio, Antonio and Ricci, Saverio, eds., Contributo italiano alla storia del Pensiero. Appendice VIII, Enciclopedia Italiana di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti. Volume IV. Roma: Istituto dell’Enciclopedia Italiana, pp. 392–396.Google Scholar
Minerbi, Marco. 1973. “Diderot, Galiani e la polemica sulla fisiocrazia (1767–1771).” Studi Storici 14, 1 (Jan.–Mar.): 147–184.Google Scholar
Mirowski, Philip. 1991. More Heat than Light. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Monjardet, Bernard. 2008. “Mathématique Sociale and Mathematics. A Case Study: Condorcet’s Effect and Medians.” Electronic Journal for History of Probability and Statistics 4 (1). https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00309825/document. Accessed May 2019.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Charles de Secondat baron de. [1748] 1989. The Spirit of Laws. Edited by Cohler, Anne M., Miller, Basia Carolyn, and Stone, Harold Samuel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mourant, John Arthur. 1943. The Physiocratic Conception of Natural Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Moravia, Sergio. 1974. Il pensiero degli idéologues. Scienza e filosofia in Francia (1780–1815). Firenze: La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Morellet, André. 1774. Réfutation de l’ouvrage qui a pour Titre Dialogues sur le Commerce des Bleds. Londres: n.p.Google Scholar
Musschenbroek, Peter van. 1745. Elementa physicae conscripta in usus accademicos. Edited by Orlandi, Giuseppe and Genovesi, Antonio. Neapoli: Petri Palumbo.Google Scholar
Neill, Thomas P. 1948. “Quesnay and Physiocracy.” Journal of the History of Ideas 9, 2 (April): 153–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neill, Thomas P.. 1949. “The Physiocrats’ Concept of Economics.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 63, 4 (Nov.): 532–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, Isaac. 1713. Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica. London: Cornelius Crownfield.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac. 1730. Opticks: Or, A Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, Inflections and Colours of Light. London: William Innys at the West-End of St. Paul’s.Google Scholar
Nicolini, Fausto. 1918. “Giambattista Vico e Ferdinando Galiani, Ricerca Storica.” Giornale Storico della Letteratura Italiana 71 (2–3): 137–207.Google Scholar
Niehans, Jürg. 1990. A History of Economic Theory. Classical Contributions, 1720–1980. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Oliveira, Agamenon R. E. 2017. “D’Alembert: Between Newtonian Science and the Cartesian Inheritance.” Advances in Historical Studies 6: 128–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orain, Arnaud. 2015. “On the Difficulty of Constituting an Economic Avant-garde in the French Enlightenment.” Introduction to special issue: “Antiphysiocratic Perspectives in Eighteenth-Century France.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 22 (3): 349–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orain, Arnaud. “Figures of Mockery: A Cultural Disqualification of Physiocracy (1760–1790).” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 22 (3): 383–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paganelli, Maria Pia. 2018. “De la Monnaie. Ferdinando Galliani et Adam Smith.” In Tiran, André and Carnino, Cecilia, eds., Ferdinando Galiani, économie et politique. Paris: Classiques Garnier, pp. 170–192.Google Scholar
Palladino, Franco. 1984. “Origine e diffusione del calcolo differenziale in Italia: con un’appendice di lettere inedite.” Giornale critico della filosofia italiana, 63, 65, fasc. 3 (Sept.–Dec.): 327–405.Google Scholar
Palladino, Franco. 1987. “La formazione scientifico-matematica di Celestino Galiani.” Bollettino Del Centro di Studi Vichiani 17: 253–262.Google Scholar
Patalano, Rosario. 2005. “La teoria del valore di Ferdinando Galiani alla luce di una versione inedita di Della Moneta.” Il Pensiero Economico Italiano XIII (2): 115–145.Google Scholar
Patalano, Rosario. 2017. “Geometry of Money in the Neapolitan Eighteenth Century: Trojano Spinelli’s Riflessioni Politiche.” History of Political Economy 49 (4): 631–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patalano, Rosario, and Realfonzo, Riccardo. 2001. “On Money by Ferdinando Galiani: Notes, Social Accounting and Confidence.” Special issue: “Della Moneta” by Galiani, Ferdinando: A Quarter Millennium Assessment.” History of Economic Ideas 9 (3): 61–94.Google Scholar
Perrot, Jean-Claude. 1992. Une histoire intellectuelle de l’économie politique: XVII–XVIII siècle. Paris: Éditions de l’École des hautes études en sciences sociales.Google Scholar
Perru, Olivier. 1997. “Les physiocrates: ‘La communauté est-elle de droit naturel?’” Revue Philosophique de Louvain, quatrième série, 95 (4): 617–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polanyi, Karl. 1957. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Porta, Pier Luigi. 2018. “From Economia Civile to Kameralwissenschaften: The Line of Descent from Genovesi to Beccaria in Pre-Smithian Europe.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 25 (4): 531–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pribram, Karl. 1983. A History of Economic Reasoning. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Quantin, Patrick. 1987. Les origines de l’idéologie. Paris: Economica.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quesnay, François. 1751. “Évidence.” In Encyclopédie, ou Dictionnaire Raisonné des Sciences, des Arts et des Métiers. Volume VI. Paris/Neufchâtel: Briasson, David, Le Breton, Durand & Samuel Faulche, pp. 146–157.Google Scholar
Quesnay, François. 1773. Recherches philosophiques sur l’évidence des vérités géométriques, avec un projet de nouveaux éléments de géométrie. Amsterdam: Knapen & Delaguette.Google Scholar
Quesnay, François. 1888. Œuvres économiques et philosophiques de F. Quesnay, accompagnées des éloges et d’autres travaux biographiques sur Quesnay par différents auteurs, publiées avec une introduction et des notes par Auguste Oncken. Frankfurt: Baer.Google Scholar
Ravix, Joël. 2018. “Entre Arlequin et Machiavelli: Galiani économiste baroque.” In Tiran, André and Carnino, Cecilia, eds., Ferdinando Galiani, économie et politique. Paris: Classiques Garnier, pp. 95–120.Google Scholar
Richards, Joan L. 2006. “Historical Mathematics in the French Eighteenth Century.” Isis 97, 4 (Dec.): 700–713.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riskin, Jessica. 2003. “The ‘Spirit of System’ and the Fortunes of Physiocracy.” Suppl. 1, “Oeconomies on the Age of Newton,” edited by Schabas, Margaret and de Marchi, Neil. History of Political Economy 35 : 42–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redman, Deborah A. 1997. The Rise of Political Economy as a Science: Methodology and the Classical Economists. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, John. 1997. “The Enlightenment above National Context: Political Economy in Eighteenth-Century Scotland and Naples.” The Historical Journal 40, 3 (Sept.): 667–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, John. 2000. “Enlightenment and Revolution: Naples 1799.” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society. Sixth Series, 10: 17–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roncaglia, Alessandro. 2005. The Wealth of Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothschild, Emma. 2001. Economic Sentiments: Adam Smith, Condorcet, and the Enlightenment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rothschild, Emma. 2005. “Axiom, Theorem, Corollary, Etc.: Condorcet and Mathematical Economics.” Social Choice and Welfare 25: 287–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shank, John Bennett. 2008. The Newton Wars and the Beginning of the French Enlightenment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelle, Gustave. 1907. Le Docteur Quesnay. Chirurgien, Médecin de Mmede Pompadour et de Louis XV, Physiocrate. Paris: Félix AlcanGoogle Scholar
Schuhl, Pierre-Maxime. 1938. “Malebranche et Quesnay.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Étranger 125, 3/4 (March–April): 313–315.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph Alois. [1954] 2006. History of Economic Analysis. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
’s Gravesande, Willem Jacob. 1723. Philosophiae Newtonianae Institutiones, in usus academicos. Leida.Google Scholar
Soliani, Riccardo, and Clément, Alain. 2018. “Les fondaments philosophiques de l’approche èconomique de Ferdinando Galiani.” In Tiran, André and Carnino, Cecilia, eds., Ferdinando Galiani, économie et politique. Paris: Classiques Garnier, pp. 121–154.Google Scholar
Spinelli, Trojano. 1749. Riflessioni politiche sopra alcuni punti della Scienza della Moneta. Napoli: n.p.Google Scholar
Spooner, Frank. C. 1956. “The Principle of Utility: The Contribution of Ferdinando Galiani.” Cambridge Historical Journal 12 (1): 81–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stapelbroek, Koen. 2006. “Preserving the Neapolitan State: Antonio Genovesi and Ferdinando Galiani on Commercial Society and Planning Economic Growth.” History of European Ideas 32 (4): 406–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stapelbroek, Koen. 2008. Love, Self-Deceit, and Money: Commerce and Morality in the Early Neapolitan Enlightenment. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stapelbroek, Koen. 2011. “The Progress of Humankind in Galiani’s Dei Doveri dei Principi Neutrali: Natural Law, Neapolitan Trade and Catherine the Great.” In Stapelbroek, Koen, ed., Trade and War: The Neutrality of Commerce in the Inter-State System. Collegium, Volume 10. Helsinki: Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies, pp. 161–183.Google Scholar
Starzyński, Wojciech. 2008. “Cartesian Elements in Quesnay’s Entry Evidence in the Encyclopédie.” Archives of History of Philosophy and Social Thought 53: 65–92.Google Scholar
Steiner, Philippe. 1993. “L’économie politique du royaume agricole: François Quesnay.” In Béraud, Alan and Faccarello, Gilbert, eds., Nouvelle histoire de la pensée économique. Volume I, Des Scolastiques au classiques. Paris: La Découverte, pp. 225–253.Google Scholar
Steiner, Philippe. 1994. “La liberté du commerce: le marché des grains.” Dix-huitième Siècle 26: 201–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steegmuller, Francis. 1988. “The Abbé Galiani: ‘The Laughing Philosopher.’” The American Scholar 57, 4 (Autumn): 589–597.Google Scholar
Tagliacozzo, Giorgio. 1968. “Economic Vichism (Vico, Galiani, Croce—Economics, Economic Liberalism).” BNL Quarterly Review 21 (85): 96–119.Google Scholar
Tiran, André. 2018. “Galiani et le Della Moneta.” In Tiran, André and Carnino, Cecilia, eds., Ferdinando Galiani, économie et politique. Paris: Classiques Garnier, pp. 57–94.Google Scholar
Tortajada, Ramon. 1990. “Produit net et latitude (Nicolas François Canard, 1754–1833).” Economies et Sociétés, Série Œconomia, PE 13: 151–172.Google Scholar
Tubaro, Paola. 2002. “A Case Study in Early Mathematical Economics: Pietro Verri and Paolo Frisi, 1772.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 24 (2): 193–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaggi, Gianni. 1987. The Economics of Francois Quesnay. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vardi, Liana. 2012. The Physiocrats and the World of the Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venturi, Franco. 1960. “Ferdinando Galiani tra enciclopedisti e fisiocrati.” Rivista storica italiana LXXII: 45–64. Translated in Italy and the Enlightenment: Studies in a Cosmopolitan Century, edited by Venturi, Franco and Woolf, Stuart J.. New York: New York University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Verri, Pietro. [1766] 1923. “Letter to his brother Alessandro, Milan 3 November 1766.” In Greppi, E. and Giulini, A., eds., Carteggio di Pietro e Alessandro Verri dal 1766 al 1796. Volume I. Milano: Cogliati, pp. 30–33.Google Scholar
Verri, Pietro. 1772. Meditazioni sulla economia politica. Sixth edition. “Accresciuta dall’autore, con un estratto del libro intitolato An Essay on the Theory of Money (Henry Lloyd)” (with Paolo Frisi’s notes). Livorno: Nella Stamperia dell’Enciclopedia.Google Scholar
Vico, Giambattista. 1709. De nostri temporis studiorum ratione. Dissertatio a Joh. Baptista Vico. Neapolis: Typis Felicis Mosca. English translation: On the Study Methods of Our Time, translated by Elio Gianturco, with a translation of The Academies and the Relation between Philosophy and Eloquence (1737) by Verene, Donald Phillip. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Vico, Giambattista. 1710. De antiquissima Italorum sapientia ex linguae latinae originibus eruenda . Libri Tres, Neapoli: Mosca. English translation: On the Most Ancient Wisdom of the Italians Unearthed from the Origins of the Latin Language, translated by Palmer, L. M.. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Vico, Giambattista. 1744. Principj di scienza nuova di G. Vico d’intorno alla commune natura delle nazioni. Terza edizione. Napoli: Stamperia Muziana. English translation: The New Science of Giambattista Vico by Bergin, Thomas Goddard and Max, Harold Fisch. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1948.Google Scholar
Villari, Lucio. 1968. “Note sulla fisiocrazia e sugli economisti napoletani del Settecento.” In Sestan, Ernesto, ed., Studi sul Settecento italiano. Napoli: Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Storici, pp. 224–251.Google Scholar
Voltaire, . 1738. Éléments de la philosophie de Newton. London: Prault.Google Scholar
Waterman, Anthony M. C. 1988. “Hume, Malthus and the Stability of Equilibrium.” History of Political Economy 20 (Spring): 85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weulersse, Georges. 1910. Le mouvement physiocratique en France (de 1756 à 1770). Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
Williams, David. 2004. Condorcet and Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar