Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:25:34.174Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Resilience is more about being flexible than about staying positive

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2015

Sander L. Koole ,
Susanne Schwager  and
Klaus Rothermund
Sander L. Koole
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Psychology, VU University Amsterdam, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The [email protected]://emotionregulationlab.com/?page_id=45
Susanne Schwager
Affiliation:
Institut für Psychosoziale Medizin und Psychosomatik, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, D-07740 Jena, Germany. [email protected]@uni-jena.dehttp://www.mpsy.uniklinikum-jena.de/Mitarbeiter/Susanne+Schwager.htmlhttp://www2.uni-jena.de/svw/allgpsy2/index.php?page=staff&id=rothermund&detail=allg
Klaus Rothermund
Affiliation:
Institut für Psychosoziale Medizin und Psychosomatik, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, D-07740 Jena, Germany. [email protected]@uni-jena.dehttp://www.mpsy.uniklinikum-jena.de/Mitarbeiter/Susanne+Schwager.htmlhttp://www2.uni-jena.de/svw/allgpsy2/index.php?page=staff&id=rothermund&detail=allg
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Kalisch et al. propose a positive appraisal style as the key mechanism that underlies resilience. The present authors suggest that flexibility in emotion processing is more conducive to resilience than a general positivity bias. People may achieve emotional flexibility through counter-regulation – a dynamic processing bias toward positive stimuli in negative contexts and negative stimuli in positive contexts.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 38 , 2015 , e109
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brickman, P., Coates, D. & Janoff-Bulman, R. (1978) Lottery winners and accident victims: Is happiness relative? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36:917–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colvin, C. R., Block, J. & Funder, D. C. (1995) Overly positive self-evaluations and personality: Negative implications for mental health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68:1152–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Derryberry, D. (1993) Attentional consequences of outcome-related motivational states: Congruent, incongruent, and focusing effects. Motivation and Emotion 17:65–89.Google Scholar
Diener, E., Colvin, C. R., Pavot, W. G. & Allman, A. (1991) The psychic costs of intense positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61:492–503.Google Scholar
Gilbert, D. T., Lieberman, M. D., Morewedge, C. K. & Wilson, T. D. (2004) The peculiar longevity of things not so bad. Psychological Science 15:14–19.Google Scholar
Kent, M., Davis, M. C. & Reich, J. W., eds. (2014) The resilience handbook: Approaches to stress and trauma. Routledge.Google Scholar
King, L. A., King, D. W., Fairbank, J. A., Keane, T. M. & Adams, G. A. (1998) Resilience–recovery factors in post-traumatic stress disorder among female and male Vietnam veterans: Hardiness, postwar social support, and additional stressful life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74:420–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koole, S. L. & Fockenberg, D. A. (2011) Implicit emotion regulation under demanding conditions: The moderating role of action versus state orientation. Cognition and Emotion 25:440–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koole, S. L. & Jostmann, N. B. (2004) Getting a grip on your feelings: Effects of action orientation and external demands on intuitive affect regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87:974–90.Google Scholar
Koole, S. L., Jostmann, N. B. & Baumann, N. (2012) Do demanding conditions help or hurt self-regulation? Social and Personality Psychology Compass 6:328–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuppens, P., Allen, N. B. & Sheeber, L. B. (2010) Emotional inertia and psychological maladjustment. Psychological Science 21:984–91.Google Scholar
Kuppens, P., Sheeber, L. B., Yap, M. B. H., Whittle, S., Simmons, J. G. & Allen, N. B. (2012) Emotional inertia prospectively predicts the onset of depressive disorder in adolescence. Emotion 12:283–89.Google Scholar
Luhmann, M., Hofmann, W., Eid, M. & Lucas, R. E. (2012) Subjective well-being and adaptation to life events: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 102:592–615.Google Scholar
Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D. & Becker, B. (2000) The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development 71(3):543–62.Google Scholar
Lyubomirsky, S. (2011) Hedonic adaptation to positive and negative experiences. In: The Oxford handbook of stress, health, and coping, ed. Folkman, S., pp. 200–24. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maddi, S. R. (2013) Turning stressful circumstances into resilient growth. Springer.Google Scholar
Masten, A. S., Best, K. M. & Garmezy, N. (1990) Resilience and development: Contributions from the study of children who overcome adversity. Development and Psychopathology 2(4):425–44.Google Scholar
Norem, J. K. (2001) The positive power of negative thinking. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Pressman, S. D. & Cohen, S. (2005) Does positive affect influence health? Psychological Bulletin 131:925–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothermund, K. (2003) Motivation and attention: Incongruent effects of feedback on the processing of valence. Emotion 3:223–38.Google Scholar
Rothermund, K. (2011) Counter-regulation and control-dependency: Affective processing biases in the service of action regulation. Social Psychology 42:55–66.Google Scholar
Rothermund, K., Gast, A. & Wentura, D. (2011) Incongruency effects in affective processing: Automatic motivational counter-regulation or mismatch-induced salience? Cognition and Emotion 25:413–25.Google Scholar
Rothermund, K., Voss, A. & Wentura, D. (2008) Counter-regulation in affective attentional bias: A basic mechanism that warrants flexibility in motivation and emotion. Emotion 8:34–46.Google Scholar
Russo, S. J., Murrough, J. W., Han, M.-H., Charney, D. S. & Nestler, E. J. (2012) Neurobiology of resilience. Nature Neuroscience 15(11):1475–84. doi: 10.1038/nn.3234.Google Scholar
Schwager, S. & Rothermund, K. (2013a) Counter-regulation triggered by emotions: Positive/negative affective states elicit opposite valence biases in affective processing. Cognition and Emotion 27:839–55.Google Scholar
Schwager, S. & Rothermund, K. (2013b) Motivation and affective processing biases in risky decision-making: A counter-regulation account. Journal of Economic Psychology 38:111–26.Google Scholar
Schwager, S. & Rothermund, K. (2014a) On the dynamics of implicit emotion regulation: Counter-regulation after remembering events of high but not of low emotional intensity. Cognition and Emotion 28:971–92.Google Scholar
Schwager, S. & Rothermund, K. (2014b) The automatic basis of resilience: Adaptive regulation of affect and cognition. In: The resilience handbook: Approaches to stress and trauma, ed. Kent, M., Davis, M. C. & Reich, J. W., pp. 55–72. Routledge.Google Scholar
Taylor, S. E. (1991) Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin 110:67–85.Google Scholar
Tugade, M. M. & Frederickson, B. L. (2004) Resilient individuals use positive emotions to bounce back from negative emotional experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 86:320–33. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.320.Google Scholar