Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-44mx8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-18T04:24:50.882Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Vocalizations are ideal identity signals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2025

Juliet C. Barry
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of Auckland, Auckland, CBD, New Zealand [email protected]
Edward H. Hagen
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA [email protected] https://anthro.vancouver.wsu.edu/people/hagen/
Samuel A. Mehr*
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of Auckland, Auckland, CBD, New Zealand [email protected] Child Study Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA [email protected] https://mehr.nz
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

If human societies are understood as identity groups, then our psychology should include design for the production and detection of credible identity signals. We argue that vocalizations are ideal identity signals because the human auditory system is sensitive to subtle acoustic features; vocal signals are efficient; and speech and song are highly complex, enabling the embedding therein of identity signals.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bryant, G. A., Fessler, D. M., Fusaroli, R., Clint, E., Aarøe, L., Apicella, C. L., … Zhou, Y. (2016). Detecting affiliation in colaughter across 24 societies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(17), 46824687.Google ScholarPubMed
Bryant, G. A., Fessler, D. M., Fusaroli, R., Clint, E., Amir, D., Chávez, B., … Zhou, Y. (2018). The perception of spontaneous and volitional laughter across 21 societies. Psychological Science, 29(9), 15151525.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carson, M. T., & Hung, H. C. (2021). Let's catch octopus for dinner: Ancient inventions of octopus lures in the Mariana Islands of the remote tropical pacific. World Archaeology, 53(4), 599614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catchpole, C. K., & Slater, P. J. B. (1995). Bird song: Biological themes and variations. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chwe, M. S. Y. (2013). Rational ritual: Culture, coordination, and common knowledge. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Crockford, C., Herbinger, I., Vigilant, L., & Boesch, C. (2004). Wild chimpanzees produce group-specific calls: A case for vocal learning? Ethology, 110(3), 221243.Google Scholar
Davies, N. B. (2011). Cuckoo adaptations: Trickery and tuning. Journal of Zoology, 284(1), 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desai, N. P., Fedurek, P., Slocombe, K. E., & Wilson, M. L. (2022). Chimpanzee pant-hoots encode individual information more reliably than group differences. American Journal of Primatology, 84(11), e23430.Google ScholarPubMed
Didla, G. S. (2020). A review of voice disguise in a forensic phonetic context. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 5(3), 721725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, N., & Levinson, S. C. (2009). The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(5), 429448.Google ScholarPubMed
Fitch, W. T. (2011). Unity and diversity in human language. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366(1563), 381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fitch, W. T. (2018). The biology and evolution of speech: A comparative analysis. Annual Review of Linguistics, 4, 265267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, H., & Billings, A. C. (2004). Assessing language attitudes: Speaker evaluation studies. In Davies, A., & Elder, C. (Eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics, 187209. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilton, C. B., Crowley-de Thierry, L., Yan, R., Martin, A., & Mehr, S. A. (2023). Children infer the behavioral contexts of unfamiliar foreign songs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 152(3), 839.Google ScholarPubMed
Kinzler, K. D., Dupoux, E., & Spelke, E. S. (2007). The native language of social cognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(30), 1257712580.Google ScholarPubMed
Lomax, A. (1968). Folk song style and culture. American Association for the Advancement of Science.Google Scholar
McElreath, R., Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. (2003). Shared norms and the evolution of ethnic markers. Current Anthropology, 44(1), 122130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mclver, J. D., & Stonedahl, G. (1993). Myrmecomorphy: Morphological and behavioral mimicry of ants. Annual Review of Entomology, 38(1), 351377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehr, S. A., & Krasnow, M. M. (2017). Parent-offspring conflict and the evolution of infant-directed song. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38(5), 674684.Google Scholar
Mehr, S. A., & Spelke, E. S. (2018). Shared musical knowledge in 11-month-old infants. Developmental Science, 21(2), 17.Google ScholarPubMed
Mehr, S. A., Song, L. A., & Spelke, E. S. (2016). For 5-month-old infants, melodies are social. Psychological Science, 27(4), 486501.Google ScholarPubMed
Mehr, S. A., Singh, M., York, H., Glowacki, L., & Krasnow, M. M. (2018). Form and function in human song. Current Biology, 28(3), 356368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mehr, S. A., Singh, M., Knox, D., Ketter, D. M., Pickens-Jones, D., Atwood, S., … Glowacki, L. (2019). Universality and diversity in human song. Science, 366(6468), 957970.Google ScholarPubMed
Mehr, S. A., Krasnow, M. M., Bryant, G. A., & Hagen, E. H. (2021) Origins of music in credible signaling. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 44(59), 122.Google Scholar
Moser, C., Buckner, W., Sarian, M., & Winking, J. (2023). Aggressive mimicry and the evolution of the human cognitive niche. Human Nature, 34(3), 456475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oller, D. K., Ramsay, G., Bene, E., Long, H. L., & Griebel, U. (2021). Protophones, the precursors to speech, dominate the human infant vocal landscape. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 376(1836), 20200255.Google ScholarPubMed
Przepiorka, W., & Diekmann, A. (2021). Parochial cooperation and the emergence of signalling norms. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 376(1838), 20200294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sims, J. P., Pirtle, W. L., & Johnson-Arnold, I. (2020). Doing hair, doing race: The influence of hairstyle on racial perception across the US. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 43(12), 20992119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, M., & Mehr, S. A. (2023). Universality, domain-specificity and development of psychological responses to music. Nature Reviews Psychology, 2(6), 333346.Google ScholarPubMed
Soltis, J. (2004). The developmental mechanisms and the signal functions of early infant crying. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(4), 477490.Google Scholar
Titze, I. R. (2021). Regulation of laryngeal resistance and maximum power transfer with semi-occluded airway vocalization. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 149(6), 41064118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development, 7(1), 4963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, C., Liang, W., Antonov, A. T., Cai, Y., Stokke, B. G., Fossøy, F., … Røskaft, E. (2012). Diversity of parasitic cuckoos and their hosts in China, Chinese Birds, 3 (1), 932.Google Scholar
Yurdum, L., Singh, M., Glowacki, L., Vardy, T., Atkinson, Q. D., Hilton, C. B., … Mehr, S. A. (2023). Universal interpretations of vocal music. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(37), e2218593120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zatorre, R. J., Belin, P., & Penhune, V. B. (2002). Structure and function of auditory cortex: Music and speech. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(1), 3746.Google ScholarPubMed