Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T22:20:25.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Arab Ottoman Migration to Brazil - Transimperial Anxieties: The Making and Unmaking of Arab Ottomans in São Paulo, Brazil, 1850–1940. By José D. Najar. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2023. Pp. 356. $65.00 cloth.

Review products

Transimperial Anxieties: The Making and Unmaking of Arab Ottomans in São Paulo, Brazil, 1850–1940. By José D. Najar. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2023. Pp. 356. $65.00 cloth.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2024

Rosana Barbosa*
Affiliation:
Saint Mary’s University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Book Review
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Academy of American Franciscan History

José D. Najar’s book is an important contribution to the English-language historiography on immigration to Latin America, a neglected topic—as if Latin America did not receive significant numbers of immigrants beyond the Spanish and Portuguese colonizers and the forced migrants from Africa. Brazil is among the four main receivers of immigrants in the Americas, and the immigration of Arab Ottomans was quite a reality. As the author acknowledges in the introduction, by 2003 there were approximately 1 million Syrian Lebanese immigrants and their descendants living in the city of São Paulo—not counting the rest of the country.

The book covers the period between the end of the Brazilian slave trade in 1850 to the beginning of the Second World War, a time of transformation for the Arab world—with the fragmentation of the Ottoman Empire—and for Brazil as well—after the deposition of the Constitutional Monarchical government of Pedro II in 1889.

One of the main contributions of this book is that Najar challenges the notion of Arab Ottoman immigration to Brazil as something that happened almost by chance, with immigrants jumping on a ship that was going to the Americas, without previous knowledge of the destination. On the contrary, “the founders of the country’s Arab Ottoman community diligently researched, planned, and orchestrated every step of their immigration to Brazil” (4). As the author clearly shows, the initial migration was a direct consequence of the signing in 1858 of a Treaty of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation between the Ottoman and the Brazilian Empires, which facilitated the circulation of people and merchandise between the two empires, allowing their citizens to live temporarily and travel in both territories.

Despite the fact that, under this treaty, Ottoman subjects could never become Brazilian citizens (or permanent residents), it was the first push toward immigration. By the second half of the nineteenth century, when Ottoman citizens began to be displaced by wars and ethnic and religious conflicts, Brazil was already known as an option for relocation. Simultaneously, this country was also engaged in an aggressive immigration campaign, which involved setting up navigation companies specifically to take immigrants to Brazil. As Najar points out, the limitations of the treaty in terms of permanent residence ended with the overthrow of the Brazilian monarchy, and naturalization laws from the First Republic granted Arab Ottoman immigrants’ Brazilian citizenship and the same rights as European immigrants.

This was so, regardless of the racist immigration policy of the early Brazilian republican government, which was focused on decreasing the proportion of Blacks in the country. Arab Ottomans benefitted as the “tools of anthropometric science used by the new state bureaucracies to make racial classifications” (111) considered them white. They took advantage of the given whiteness, tying “their identities to this white status, which allowed them to access economic resources and commercial powers, among other opportunities, and to succeed in Brazil” (169). Their financial success contributed to their acceptance—especially that of their descendants—as whites and as members of the elites, despite the earlier stereotypes and misconceptions of the general population.

Najar also makes a major contribution with his discussion of gender, showing how the historiography has silenced the voices of women in this diaspora. As the author states, “Arab Ottoman women immigrants significantly contributed to the community’s social, political, and economic success” (23).

José Najar reconstructed the lives of these immigrants through meticulous research. Not only did he analyze the most relevant secondary sources available on the topic and time period but he also conducted careful archival research in municipal and state archives at the diplomatic archives in São Paulo, Brazil, and at the National Archive in Rio de Janeiro. Notably his oral history research at the Memorial do Immigrant in São Paulo has provided his book with valuable personal stories that corroborate his overall analysis. The result is an excellent examination of Arab Ottoman migration to Brazil that highly contributes to the understanding of how this country has the largest population of Arab descendants outside of the Middle East.