Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T23:06:54.872Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Measurement of the permittivity of ice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2017

Bernhard Philberth*
Affiliation:
Destouchesstrasse 14, 8 München 23, Germany
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Correspondence
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1967

Sir,

S. Evans writes in his very interesting publication (Reference EvansEvans, 1965, p. 785): “Wc have shown that pure ice has a relaxation spectrum, related to temperature, but more measurements are needed on naturally occurring snow and ice. It may then be possible to develop a technique for temperature measurement in deep ice by investigating the relaxation spectrum with electrodes on the surface.” For such a technique it is important to measure the permittivityFootnote * of deep ice ‘layers under the original conditions of temperature, pressure and grain structure. This could be done by means of electro-thermal deep drilling. I want to suggest a simple device for achieving this.

The flat or pyramidally pointed bottom of the deep-drilling probe (Reference PhilberthPhilberth, 1966) is one electrode, the cylindrical side wall of the probe is the earthed electrode; both electrodes together form a capacitor. Its capacitance can be measured as follows: A capacitor C of high precision is connected parallel to it (in order to reduce the loss tangent) and by means of a transistor-amplifier A auto-oscillation is caused; this is brought about by parallel connection of an inductor L, or by one of the known RC-circuits.

The frequency of the oscillation is a function of the real part of the complex permittivity; the maximum sensitivity of the real part to changes of temperature is in the range where the imaginary part (loss factor) reaches its maximum. For ice temperatures between −20°C. and 0°C., this range is realized for frequencies in the order of 3 kHz. For Greenland conditions frequencies of the order of 3 to 10 kHz. seem to be suitable. Perhaps higher frequencies are less influenced by impurities in the ice. The use of two or more frequency bands gives much more information on the permittivity.

It is a special advantage of this method, that the measurements can be made while the probe is actually melting its way down. This may be surprising; but it is a fact that the excess temperature of the ice under a penetrating probe is exponentially decreasing with the vertical distance from the bottom of the probe (Reference PhilberthPhilberth, 1962). For a probe-velocity of 2 m./hr. the temperature some millimetres away from the probe bottom is nearly undisturbed. The warmed ice layer in the immediate neighbourhood of the probe bottom has practically no influence on the measurement, because it is very thin; furthermore the measured values can be compared and be corrected with the values measured for the frozen-in state of the probe. The calibration is simple: It can be done by putting the probe in media of well-known permittivity, e.g. air, petroleum, alcohol, water, ice.

Fig. 1. Diagrammatic sketch of proposed method of measuring permittivity and hence temperature of ice using a thermal boring head

The described method is a way to measure the permittivity of the ice at its natural temperature. For the measurement of this temperature itself, electric thermometers (thermistors) are installed in the probe. Some days after the interruption of the heating, the temperature of the probe has sufficiently approximated the natural temperature.

The relationship between permittivity and temperature once being fixed by some calibration measurements, the measurement of the permittivity by the penetrating probe gives an indication of the temperature. Such an indirect measurement of the temperature may be less precise than the measurement by the thermistors, but it has the advantage of procuring a continuous series of values and of avoiding the risk and the loss of time during the freezing-in and the cooling down of the probe. There is another advantage: the approach of the probe to stones or to the bedrock is indicated by a rapid rise of the frequency.

Footnotes

* Permittivity is the term recommended by the Commission on Symbols, Units and Nomenclature of the International Union of Pure and Applied Physics for the quantity sometimes known as dielectric constant. As the quantity is not a constant but varies with frequency and temperature—in the case of ice the relative permittivity can be anywhere between 3 and 100—a term which does not use the word constant is to be welcomed. Ed.

References

Evans, S. 1965. Dielectric properties of ice and snow—a review. Journal of Glaciology, Vol. 5, No. 42, p. 77392.Google Scholar
Philberth, K. 1962. Remarque sur une sonde thermique pour mesurer la température des couches de glace. Domptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Seances de l’Académie des Sciences (Paris), Tom. egg, No. 22, p. 302224.Google Scholar
Philberth, K. 1966. Eine Schmelzsonde zur Messung des Temperaturprofils in Eiskalotten. Die Umschau in Wissenschaft und Technik, Jahrg. 66, Ht. 11, p. 360.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Diagrammatic sketch of proposed method of measuring permittivity and hence temperature of ice using a thermal boring head