Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:52:24.695Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Societies also prioritize female survival

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2022

April Bleske-Rechek Open the ORCID record for April Bleske-Rechek [Opens in a new window]  and
Robert O. Deaner
April Bleske-Rechek
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, Eau Claire, WI 54720, USA [email protected]://bleske-rechek.com
Robert O. Deaner
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI 49401-9403, USA [email protected]://faculty.gvsu.edu/deanerr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We extend Benenson et al.'s hypothesis from the individual level to the societal level. Because women have highly limited reproductive rates, societies have generally prioritized female survival and regarded males as expendable. We describe various lines of evidence that are consistent with this hypothesis, and we offer additional predictions about differential attitudes toward male versus female endangerment.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 45 , 2022 , e131
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ABC News (n.d.). Japan's Fukushima 50: Heroes who volunteered to stay behind at Japan's crippled nuclear plants. Retrieved January 23, 2022, from https://abcnews.go.com/International/fukushima-50-line-defense-japanese-nuclear-complex/story?id=13147746Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F. (2010). Is there anything good about men?: How cultures flourish by exploiting men. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Belyakov, O. V., Steinhäusler, F., & Trott, K.-R. (2000). Chernobyl liquidators. The people and the doses. Proceedings of the Tenth International Congress of the International Radiation Protection Association, Hiroshima, Japan, May 14–19, 2000. https://www.irpa.net/irpa10/cdrom/00666.pdfGoogle Scholar
Browne, K. (2007). Co-ed combat: The new evidence that women shouldn't fight the nation's wars. Sentinel.Google Scholar
Bureau of Labor Statistics (2020). National census of fatal occupational injuries in 2019. December 16. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/cfoi_12162020.pdfGoogle Scholar
Bureau of Labor Statistics (2022). Labor force statistics from the current population survey. Table 18: Employed persons by detailed industry, sex, race, and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. Accessed January 20, 2022: https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat18.htmGoogle Scholar
Burnstein, E., Crandall, C., & Kitayama, S. (1994). Some neo-Darwinian decision rules for altruism: Weighing cues for inclusive fitness as a function of the biological importance of the decision. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(5), 773–789. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.5.773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A. (1999). Staying alive: Evolution, culture, and women's intrasexual aggression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(2), 203–214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chagnon, N. A. (1988). Life histories, blood revenge, and warfare in a tribal population. Science, 239(4843), 985–992. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.239.4843.985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curry, T. R.., Lee, G., & Rodriguez, S. F. (2004). Does victim gender increase sentence severity? Further explorations of gender dynamics and sentencing outcomes. Crime & Delinquency, 50(3), 319–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128703256265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deaner, R. O., & Smith, B. A. (2013). Sex differences in sports across 50 societies. Cross-Cultural Research, 47(3), 268–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397112463687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FeldmanHall, O., Dalgleish, T., Evans, D., Navrady, L., Tedeschi, E., & Mobbs, D. (2016). Moral chivalry: Gender and harm sensitivity predict costly altruism. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(6), 542–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616647448CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Felson, R. B. (2000). The normative protection of women from violence. Sociological Forum, 15(1), 91–116. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007598204631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaeser, E. L., & Sacerdote, B. (2003). Sentencing in homicide cases and the role of vengeance. Journal of Legal Studies, 32(2), 363–392. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/374707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glowacki, L., Wilson, M. L., & Wrangham, R. W. (2020). The evolutionary anthropology of war. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 178, 963–982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.09.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, M. B., & Knight-Bohnhoff, K. (1996). Gender and aggression I: Perceptions of aggression. Sex Roles, 35(1/2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01548172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeley, L. H. (1996). War before civilization. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reynolds, T., Howard, C., Sjastad, H., Zhu, L., Okimoto, T. G., Baumeister, R. F., … Kim, J. (2020). Man up and take it: Gender bias in moral typecasting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 120–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.05.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richerson, P., Baldini, R., Bell, A. V., Demps, K., Frost, K., Hillis, V., … Zefferman, M. (2016). Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, e30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1400106XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turchin, P., Currie, T. E., Turner, E. A. L., & Gavrilets, S. (2013). War, space, and the evolution of Old World complex societies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(41), 16384–16389. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1308825110CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Schaik, C. P., Bshary, R., Wagner, G., & Cunha, F. (2022). Male anti-predation services in primates as costly signaling? A comparative analysis and review. Ethology, 128(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.13233CrossRefGoogle Scholar