Generalized Poisson (GP) distribution was introduced in Consul & Jain ((1973). Technometrics, 15(4), 791–799.). Since then it has found various applications in actuarial science and other areas. In this paper, we focus on the distributional properties of GP and its related distributions. In particular, we study the distributional properties of distributions in the $\mathcal{H}$ family, which includes GP and generalized negative binomial distributions as special cases. We demonstrate that the moment and size-biased transformations of distributions within the $\mathcal{H}$ family remain in the same family, which significantly extends the results presented in Ambagaspitiya & Balakrishnan ((1994). ASTINBulletin: the Journal of the IAA, 24(2), 255–263.) and Ambagaspitiya ((1995). Insurance Mathematics and Economics, 2(16), 107–127.). Such findings enable us to provide recursive formulas for evaluating risk measures, such as Value-at-Risk and conditional tail expectation of the compound GP distributions. In addition, we show that the risk measures can be calculated by making use of transform methods, such as fast Fourier transform. In fact, the transformation method showed a remarkable time advantage over the recursive method. We numerically compare the risk measures of the compound sums when the primary distributions are Poisson and GP. The results illustrate the model risk for the loss frequency distribution.

Risk measurement and econometrics are the two pillars of actuarial science. Unlike econometrics, risk measurement allows taking into account decision-makers’ risk aversion when analyzing the risks. We propose a hybrid model that captures decision-makers’ regression-based approach to study risks, focusing on explanatory variables while paying attention to risk severity. Our model considers different loss functions that quantify the severity of the losses that are provided by the risk manager or the actuary. We present an explicit formula for the regression estimators for the proposed risk-based regression problem and study the proposed results. Finally, we provide a numerical study of the results using data from the insurance industry.

This paper presents the AffineMortality R package which performs parameter estimation, goodness-of-fit analysis, simulation, and projection of future mortality rates for a set of affine mortality models for use in pricing and reserving. The computational routines build on the univariate Kalman Filtering approach of Koopman and Durbin ((2000). Journal of Time Series Analysis, 21(3), 281–296.) along other numerical methods to enhance the robustness of the results. This paper provides a discussion of how the package works in order to effectively estimate and project survival curves, and describes the available functions. Illustration of the package for mortality analysis of the US male data set is provided.

Based on the recent papers, two distributions for the total claims amount (loss cost) are considered: compound Poisson-gamma and Tweedie. Each is used as an underlying distribution in the Bonus-Malus Scale (BMS) model. The BMS model links the premium of an insurance contract to a function of the insurance experience of the related policy. In other words, the idea is to model the increase and the decrease in premiums for insureds who do or do not file claims. We applied our approach to a sample of data from a major insurance company in Canada. Data fit and predictability were analyzed. We showed that the studied models are exciting alternatives to consider from a practical point of view, and that predictive ratemaking models can address some important practical considerations.

This study investigates the benefits and drawbacks of pension plan consolidation by quantifying the impact of mergers of heterogeneous plans on different stakeholders in a unique Canadian implementation of defined benefit plans. Using a comprehensive framework that combines a realistic economic scenario generator, a stochastic mortality model that captures differences among subpopulations, a cost model with economies of scale, and a dynamic asset allocation methodology, we evaluate the combined effect of asset- and liability-side changes on three groups of measures: plan-related risk measures assessing profits from an economic capital perspective, consumption-based metrics to understand the impact on members, and contribution risk measures capturing the risk from the employer’s viewpoint. We apply the framework to a hypothetical and empirically relevant merger and find that consolidation is favorable under most circumstances: the positive impacts of better diversification and economies of scale continue to outweigh the negative effects of heterogeneity even when the merging plans have different mortality expectations, different maturity levels, or modest differences in initial funded ratios.

This paper studies a hierarchical risk model where an accident can cause a combination of different types of claims, whose sizes could be dependent. In addition, the frequencies of accidents that cause the different combinations of claims are dependent. We first derive formulas for computing risk measures, such as the Tail Conditional Expectation and Tail Variance of the aggregate losses for a portfolio of businesses. Then, we present formulas for performing the associated capital allocation to different types of claims in the portfolio. The main tool we used is the moment (or size-biased) transform of the multivariate distributions.

This paper introduces DivFolio, a multiperiod portfolio selection and analytic software application that incorporates automated and user-determined divestment practices accommodating Environmental Social Governance (ESG) and portfolio carbon footprint considerations. This freely available portfolio analytics software tool is written in R with a GUI interface developed as an R Shiny application for ease of user experience. Users can utilize this software to dynamically assess the performance of asset selections from global equity, exchange-traded funds, exchange-traded notes, and depositary receipts markets over multiple time periods. This assessment is based on the impact of ESG investment and fossil-fuel divestment practices on portfolio behavior in terms of risk, return, stability, diversification, and climate mitigation credentials of associated investment decisions. We highlight two applications of DivFolio. The first revolves around using sector scanning to divest from a specialized portfolio featuring constituents of the FTSE 100. The second, rooted in actuarial considerations, focuses on divestment strategies informed by environmental risk assessments for mixed pension portfolios in the US and UK.

This paper will outline the functionality available in the CovRegpy package which was written for actuarial practitioners, wealth managers, fund managers, and portfolio analysts in the language of Python 3.11. The objective is to develop a new class of covariance regression factor models for covariance forecasting, along with a library of portfolio allocation tools that integrate with this new covariance forecasting framework. The novelty is in two stages: the type of covariance regression model and factor extractions used to construct the covariates used in the covariance regression, along with a powerful portfolio allocation framework for dynamic multi-period asset investment management.

The major contributions of package CovRegpy can be found on the GitHub repository for this library in the scripts: CovRegpy.py, CovRegpy_DCC.py, CovRegpy_RPP.py, CovRegpy_SSA.py, CovRegpy_SSD.py, and CovRegpy_X11.py. These six scripts contain implementations of software features including multivariate covariance time series models based on the regularized covariance regression (RCR) framework, dynamic conditional correlation (DCC) framework, risk premia parity (RPP) weighting functions, singular spectrum analysis (SSA), singular spectrum decomposition (SSD), and X11 decomposition framework, respectively.

These techniques can be used sequentially or independently with other techniques to extract implicit factors to use them as covariates in the RCR framework to forecast covariance and correlation structures and finally apply portfolio weighting strategies based on the portfolio risk measures based on forecasted covariance assumptions. Explicit financial factors can be used in the covariance regression framework, implicit factors can be used in the traditional explicit market factor setting, and RPP techniques with long/short equity weighting strategies can be used in traditional covariance assumption frameworks.

We examine, herein, two real-world case studies for actuarial practitioners. The first of these is a modification (demonstrating the regularization of covariance regression) of the original example from Hoff & Niu ((2012). Statistica Sinica, 22(2), 729–753) which modeled the covariance and correlative relationship that exists between forced expiratory volume (FEV) and age and FEV and height. We examine this within the context of making probabilistic predictions about mortality rates in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

The second case study is a more complete example using this package wherein we present a funded and unfunded UK pension example. The decomposition algorithm isolates high-, mid-, and low-frequency structures from FTSE 100 constituents over 20 years. These are used to forecast the forthcoming quarter’s covariance structure to weight the portfolio based on the RPP strategy. These fully funded pensions are compared against the performance of a fully unfunded pension using the FTSE 100 index performance as a proxy.

Guaranteed minimum accumulation benefits (GMABs) are retirement savings vehicles that protect the policyholder against downside market risk. This article proposes a valuation method for these contracts based on physics-inspired neural networks (PINNs), in the presence of multiple financial and biometric risk factors. A PINN integrates principles from physics into its learning process to enhance its efficiency in solving complex problems. In this article, the driving principle is the Feynman–Kac (FK) equation, which is a partial differential equation (PDE) governing the GMAB price in an arbitrage-free market. In our context, the FK PDE depends on multiple variables and is difficult to solve using classical finite difference approximations. In comparison, PINNs constitute an efficient alternative that can evaluate GMABs with various specifications without the need for retraining. To illustrate this, we consider a market with four risk factors. We first derive a closed-form expression for the GMAB that serves as a benchmark for the PINN. Next, we propose a scaled version of the FK equation that we solve using a PINN. Pricing errors are analyzed in a numerical illustration.

The calculation of life and health insurance liabilities is based on assumptions about mortality and disability rates, and insurance companies face systematic insurance risks if assumptions about these rates change. In this paper, we study how to manage systematic insurance risks in a multi-state setup by considering securities linked to the transition intensities of the model. We assume there exists a market for trading two securities linked to, for instance, mortality and disability rates, the de-risking option and the de-risking swap, and we describe the optimization problem to find the de-risking strategy that minimizes systematic insurance risks in a multi-state setup. We develop a numerical example based on the disability model, and the results imply that systematic insurance risks significantly decrease when implementing de-risking strategies.

Deep neural networks have become an important tool for use in actuarial tasks, due to the significant gains in accuracy provided by these techniques compared to traditional methods, but also due to the close connection of these models to the generalized linear models (GLMs) currently used in industry. Although constraining GLM parameters relating to insurance risk factors to be smooth or exhibit monotonicity is trivial, methods to incorporate such constraints into deep neural networks have not yet been developed. This is a barrier for the adoption of neural networks in insurance practice since actuaries often impose these constraints for commercial or statistical reasons. In this work, we present a novel method for enforcing constraints within deep neural network models, and we show how these models can be trained. Moreover, we provide example applications using real-world datasets. We call our proposed method ICEnet to emphasize the close link of our proposal to the individual conditional expectation model interpretability technique.

In this paper, we construct interpretable zero-inflated neural network models for modeling hospital admission counts related to respiratory diseases among a health-insured population and their dependants in the United States. In particular, we exemplify our approach by considering the zero-inflated Poisson neural network (ZIPNN), and we follow the combined actuarial neural network (CANN) approach for developing zero-inflated combined actuarial neural network (ZIPCANN) models for modeling admission rates, which can accommodate the excess zero nature of admission counts data. Furthermore, we adopt the LocalGLMnet approach (Richman & Wüthrich (2023). Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 2023(1), 71–95.) for interpreting the ZIPNN model results. This facilitates the analysis of the impact of a number of socio-demographic factors on the admission rates related to respiratory disease while benefiting from an improved predictive performance. The real-life utility of the methodologies developed as part of this work lies in the fact that they facilitate accurate rate setting, in addition to offering the potential to inform health interventions.

This paper introduces gemact, a Python package for actuarial modeling based on the collective risk model. The library supports applications to risk costing and risk transfer, loss aggregation, and loss reserving. We add new probability distributions to those available in scipy, including the (a, b, 0) and (a, b, 1) discrete distributions, copulas of the Archimedean family, the Gaussian, the Student t and the Fundamental copulas. We provide an implementation of the AEP algorithm for calculating the cumulative distribution function of the sum of dependent, nonnegative random variables, given their dependency structure specified with a copula. The theoretical framework is introduced at the beginning of each section to give the reader with a sufficient understanding of the underlying actuarial models.

A closed-form solution for zero-coupon bonds is obtained for a version of the discrete-time arbitrage-free Nelson-Siegel model. An estimation procedure relying on a Kalman filter is provided. The model is shown to produce adequate fit when applied to historical Canadian spot rate data and to improve distributional predictive performance over benchmarks. An adaptation of the mixed fund return model from Augustyniak et al. ((2021). ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA, 51(1), 131–159.) is also provided to include the discrete-time arbitrage-free Nelson-Siegel model as one of its building blocks.

Handling nominal covariates with a large number of categories is challenging for both statistical and machine learning techniques. This problem is further exacerbated when the nominal variable has a hierarchical structure. We commonly rely on methods such as the random effects approach to incorporate these covariates in a predictive model. Nonetheless, in certain situations, even the random effects approach may encounter estimation problems. We propose the data-driven Partitioning Hierarchical Risk-factors Adaptive Top-down algorithm to reduce the hierarchically structured risk factor to its essence, by grouping similar categories at each level of the hierarchy. We work top-down and engineer several features to characterize the profile of the categories at a specific level in the hierarchy. In our workers’ compensation case study, we characterize the risk profile of an industry via its observed damage rates and claim frequencies. In addition, we use embeddings to encode the textual description of the economic activity of the insured company. These features are then used as input in a clustering algorithm to group similar categories. Our method substantially reduces the number of categories and results in a grouping that is generalizable to out-of-sample data. Moreover, we obtain a better differentiation between high-risk and low-risk companies.

Thanks to its outstanding performances, boosting has rapidly gained wide acceptance among actuaries. Wüthrich and Buser (Data Analytics for Non-Life Insurance Pricing. Lecture notes available at SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2870308, 2019) established that boosting can be conducted directly on the response under Poisson deviance loss function and log-link, by adapting the weights at each step. This is particularly useful to analyze low counts (typically, numbers of reported claims at policy level in personal lines). Huyghe et al. (Boosting cost-complexity pruned trees on Tweedie responses: The ABT machine for insurance ratemaking. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/03461238.2023.2258135, 2022) adopted this approach to propose a new boosting machine with cost-complexity pruned trees. In this approach, trees included in the score progressively reduce to the root-node one, in an adaptive way. This paper reviews these results and presents the new BT package in R contributed by Willame (Boosting Trees Algorithm. https://cran.r-project.org/package=BT; https://github.com/GiregWillame/BT, 2022), which is designed to implement this approach for insurance studies. A numerical illustration demonstrates the relevance of the new tool for insurance pricing.

With the recent outbreak of COVID-19, evaluating the epidemic risk appears to be a pressing issue of global concern and one of the major challenges recently. In the fight against pandemics, the ability to understand, model, and forecast the transmission dynamics of infectious diseases plays a crucial role. This paper provides an overview of foundational compartment models and introduces the Susceptible-Exposed-Infected-Containing-3-Substates-Recovered-Dead model to study the dynamics of COVID-19. A meticulous data calibration procedure is employed to study the evolution trend of an actual pandemic using real-world data from Victoria, Australia. Additionally, the paper discusses innovative applications of epidemic models to the insurance industry, which are currently under investigation. Through the use of the newly developed analytically tractable model, insurance companies are able to determine fair premium levels during an outbreak. Moreover, the paper provides practical guidance for insurance companies by examining the variation in reserve levels over time.

In a subgroup analysis for an actuarial problem, the goal is for the investigator to classify the policyholders into unique groups, where the claims experience within each group are made as homogenous as possible. In this paper, we illustrate how the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) approach for subgroup analysis can be modified so that it can be more easily incorporated into an insurance claims analysis. We present an approach to penalize adjacent coefficients only and show how the algorithm can be implemented for fast estimation of the parameters. We present three different cases of the model, depending on the level of dependence among the different coverage groups within the data. In addition, we provide an interpretation of the credibility problem using both random effects and fixed effects, where the fixed effects approach corresponds to the ADMM approach to subgroup analysis, while the random effects approach represents the classic Bayesian approach. In an empirical study, we demonstrate how these approaches can be applied to real data using the Wisconsin Local Government Property Insurance Fund data. Our results show that the presented approach to subgroup analysis could provide a classification of the policyholders that improves the prediction accuracy of the claim frequencies in case other classifying variables are unavailable in the data.

This paper provides a review of cyber risk research accomplished in different disciplines, with a primary goal to aid researchers in the field of insurance and actuarial science in identifying potential research gaps as well as leveraging useful models and techniques that have been considered in the literature. We highlight the recent advancements in cyber risk prediction, modeling, management, and insurance achieved in different domains including computer engineering, actuarial science, and business studies. The surveyed works are classified according to their respective modeling approaches, allowing readers to more easily compare the technical aspects of the surveyed works and spot out research gaps based on the research tools of their liking. We conclude this paper with a summary of possible research directions that are identified from the review.