Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T02:53:40.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Psychotherapy competencies in trainees in South Wales

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Rehan Ahmed Siddiquee
Affiliation:
General Adult Psychiatry, West Midlands, email: [email protected]
Arif A. Qadir
Affiliation:
Cefn Coed Hospital, Swansea
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Columns
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2007

A survey of psychiatric trainees was conducted in South Wales based on suggested educational experiences/competencies set by the Psychotherapy Specialist Advisory SubCommittee of the Royal College of Psychiatrists’ Specialist Training Committee for trainees not undergoing specialist psychotherapy training.

Out of 88 trainees applying for ST2 and ST3 from all five training schemes in South Wales, 40 returned completed questionnaires. None of the surveyed trainees had all the competencies required to apply for their respective ST grade at the time the survey was conducted. Numbers of trainees achieving the suggested educational experiences/competencies were as follows: case presentations in Balint groups, n=5; extended psychotherapy case, n=1; briefer psychology interventions, n=2; paper presentations on psychological treatments, n=3; attendance at psychotherapy unit business meeting, n=3; patient assessments for psychological treatment with trainer, n=8; didactic input for assessment of patients for psychological treatment, n=11.

Trainees from resource-poor regions are disadvantaged when applying in open competition with trainees from regions blessed with better infrastructure and training facilities. It seems unfair to expect trainees to demonstrate competencies for which they have not been provided the educational supervision or opportunity to develop. From a trainee's perspective, it would have been better if the list of competencies had been finalised and circulated earlier, giving trainees more time to achieve them. It would also have helped the trainees if competencies could have been drawn up to reflect achievable standards across the entire UK and not just standards achievable in a select few well-funded and well-resourced regions.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.