Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T08:31:48.496Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ownership as a component of the extended self

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2023

Bruce Hood Open the ORCID record for Bruce Hood [Opens in a new window]
Bruce Hood*
Affiliation:
School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ownership of resources can be established by evolved competitive and cooperative mechanisms as explained by the target article. However, there is one aspect of ownership that is not captured by computational models which is important to identity, namely the role of owned items as components of “the extended self” hypothesis.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 46 , 2023 , e338
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Apicella, C. L., Azevedo, E. M., Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2013). Evolutionary origins of the endowment effect: Evidence from hunter-gatherers. American Economic Review, 104(6), 1793–1805. doi:10.1257/aer.104.6.1793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belk, R. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 139–168. doi:10.1086/209154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harbaugh, W. T., Krause, K., & Vesterlund, L. (2001). Are adults better behaved than children? Age, experience, and the endowment effect. Economics Letters, 70, 175–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, C., & Fisher, S. (2017). Mine is better than yours: Investigating the ownership effect in children with autism spectrum disorder and typically developing children. Cognition, 172, 26–36. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.11.009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hood, B. (2009). Supersense: Why we believe in the unbelievable. HarperOne.Google Scholar
Hood, B. (2014). Quiddity and haecceity as distinct forms of essentialism. Behavioral and Brain Science, 37(5), 492–493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hood, B. (2019). Possessed: Why we want more than we need. Penguin.Google Scholar
Hood, B. M., & Bloom, P. (2008). Children prefer certain individuals to perfect duplicates. Cognition, 106, 455–462. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.01.012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hood, B., Weltzien, S., Marsh, L., & Kanngiesser, P. (2016). Picture yourself: Self-focus and the endowment effect in preschool children. Cognition, 152, 70–77. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.03.019.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. Henry Holt & Co.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1991). The endowment effect, loss aversion and status quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddux, W. W., Yang, H., Falk, C., Adam, H., Adair, W., Endo, Y., ... Heine, S. J. (2010). For whom is parting with possessions more painful? Cultural differences in the endowment effect. Psychological Science, 21(12), 1910–1917. doi:10.1177/0956797610388818.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newman, G. E., Diesendruck, G., & Bloom, P. (2011). Celebrity contagion and the value of objects. Journal of Consumer Research, 38, 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1086/658999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartre, J. P. (1943/1969). Being and nothingness: A phenomenological essay on ontology. Philosophical Library/Methuen.Google Scholar