Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:21:13.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The proximate mechanisms and ultimate functions of smiles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2010

Marc Mehu  and
Karim N'Diaye
Marc Mehu
Affiliation:
Swiss Center for Affective Sciences, University of Geneva, CH-1205 Geneva, Switzerland. [email protected]://www.affective-sciences.org
Karim N'Diaye
Affiliation:
Research Center of the Brain and Spine Institute, Université Pierre et Marie Curie (UPMC), CNRS UMR 7225, INSERM UMR S 975, 75006 Paris, France. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Niedenthal et al's classification of smiles erroneously conflates psychological mechanisms and adaptive functions. This confusion weakens the rationale behind the types of smiles they chose to individuate, and it obfuscates the distinction between the communicative versus denotative nature of smiles and the role of perceived-gaze direction in emotion recognition.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 33 , Issue 6 , December 2010 , pp. 454 - 455
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bindemann, M., Burton, A. M. & Langton, S. R. H. (2008) How do eye gaze and facial expression interact? Visual Cognition 16(6):708.Google Scholar
Brown, W. M., Palameta, B. & Moore, C. (2003) Are there nonverbal cues to commitment? An exploratory study using the zero-acquaintance video presentation paradigm. Evolutionary Psychology 1:42–69.Google Scholar
Ekman, P. (1997) Should we call it expression or communication? Innovations in Social Science Research 10(4):333–44.Google Scholar
Flack, J. C. & de Waal, F. B. M. (2007) Context modulates signal meaning in primate communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 104(5):1581–86.Google Scholar
Hall, J. A., Hogan, T. G. & Carter, J. D. (2002) Assigned and felt status in relation to observer-coded and participant-reported smiling. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 26(2):63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasson, O. (1994) Cheating signals. Journal of Theoretical Biology 167:223–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaFrance, M. & Hecht, M. A. (1999) Option or obligation to smile: The effect of power and gender on facial expression. In: The social context of non-verbal behaviour. Studies in emotion and social interactions, ed. Philippot, P., Feldman, R. S. & Coats, E. J., pp. 45–70. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mehu, M. & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2008) Naturalistic observations of smiling and laughter in human group interactions. Behaviour 145:1747–80.Google Scholar
Mehu, M., Grammer, K. & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2007) Smiles when sharing. Evolution and Human Behavior 28(6):415–22.Google Scholar
N'Diaye, K., Sander, D. & Vuilleumier, P. (2009) Self-relevance processing in the human amygdala: Gaze direction, facial expression, and emotion intensity. Emotion 9(6):798–806.Google Scholar
Preuschoft, S. & van Hooff, J. A. R. A. M. (1997) The social function of “smile” and “laughter”: Variations across primate species and societies. In: Non-verbal communication: Where nature meets culture, ed. Segerstrale, U. & Molnàr, P., pp. 171–89. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Sander, D., Grandjean, D., Kaiser, S., Wehrle, T. & Scherer, K. R. (2007) Interaction effects of perceived gaze direction and dynamic facial expression: Evidence for appraisal theories of emotion. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 19(3):470–80.Google Scholar
Schmid-Mast, M. & Hall, J. A. (2004) When is dominance related to smiling? Assigned dominance, dominance preference, trait dominance, and gender moderators. Sex Roles 50(5–6):387–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinbergen, N. (1963) On aims and methods of ethology. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 20:410–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar