Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T14:40:20.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessing misreporting of energy intake in third trimester of pregnancy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 August 2011

V. Cairnduff ,
A. J. Hill ,
M. Sinclair ,
T. McCrorie  and
D. R. McCance
V. Cairnduff
Affiliation:
Diabetes Research Group, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster, Coleraine, BT52 1SA, UK
A. J. Hill
Affiliation:
Diabetes Research Group, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster, Coleraine, BT52 1SA, UK
M. Sinclair
Affiliation:
Nursing Research Institute, School of Nursing, University of Ulster, Jordanstown BT37 0QB, UK
T. McCrorie
Affiliation:
Northern Ireland Centre for Food and Health, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster, Coleraine, BT52 1SA, UK
D. R. McCance
Affiliation:
Regional centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Hospitals, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, BT12 6BW, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Abstract
Information
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society , Volume 70 , Issue OCE3: Joint Irish Section and American Society for Nutrition Meeting, 15–17 June 2011, 70th anniversary: ‘Vitamins in early development and healthy ageing: impact on infectious and chronic disease’ , 2011 , E108
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2011

Misreporting of food intake has been shown to affect the validity of dietary data collected in nutritional surveys and this may affect the interpretation of associations between dietary intakes and health outcome measures(Reference Black1). The aim of this study is to assess the extent to which misreporting of energy intake occurs in the third trimester pregnancy.

The data were collected as part of the Belfast arm of the Hyperglycaemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) study that was designed to investigate associations between blood glucose levels below the current criteria for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes and adverse pregnancy outcomes(2). At approximately 28 weeks gestation (24–32 weeks) forty women within the Belfast cohort completed a 7 d food diary. Data from the food diaries were entered into WISP version 3.0 (Tinuviel Software, UK) to calculate estimated nutrient intakes and statistical analysis was performed in SPSS version 17.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, USA).

Misreporting of energy intake within the dataset was assessed using the Estimated Energy Requirement (EER): Energy Intake (EI). The appropriate equation published by the Institute of Medicine (IOM, 2002) was used to calculate EER for each participant(3) and an EI:EER was calculated for each individual. Intra-individual variation in EI and the median of EI:EER were used to calculate the EI:EER 95% CI cut-offs for misreporting(Reference Black and Cole4). Using these cut-offs (0.83–1.23) eight (20%) women are classed as under-reporting (UR), twenty-six (65%) women are classed as accurately reporting (AR) and six (15%) women classed as over reporting (OR) energy intake. When investigated with BMI category, levels of misreporting are shown to be higher in overweight and obese individuals when compared with those with a BMI within the normal range.

Descriptive statistics were carried out to calculate mean nutrient intakes for those AR (n 26).

The mean intakes of the twenty-six women accurately reporting EI exceeded the dietary eference values for pregnancy for energy, protein and Ca. However, the mean intakes of Fe and Englyst fibre were below the recommended levels. This preliminary analysis gives an indication of misreporting of energy intake within the HAPO dataset. Further investigation of the nutrient intakes of the larger HAPO Belfast cohort (n 1639) and associations between nutrient intakes and outcomes of pregnancy is required.

References

1.Black, AE (2000) Critical evaluation of energy intake using Goldberg cut-off for energy intake: basal metabolic rate. A practical guide to its calculation, use and limitations. In J Obes 24, 1119–1130.Google Scholar
2.HAPO study Cooperative Research Group (2002). The hyperglycaemia and adverse pregnancy outcome study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 78, 69–77.Google Scholar
3.Institute of Medicine of the National Academies (2002) Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fibre, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein and Amino Acids. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
4.Black, AE & Cole, TJ (2000) Within- and between- subject variation in energy expenditure measured by the doubly labelled water technique: implications for validating reported dietary energy intake. Eur J Clin Nutr 54, 386–394.Google Scholar