Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:47:52.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Could embodied simulation be a by-product of emotion perception?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2010

Julian Kiverstein
Affiliation:
School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 7PU, Scotland, United Kingdom. [email protected]://www.philosophy.ed.ac.uk/people/research-staff/julian-kiverstein.html
Edoardo Zamuner
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, LaTrobe University, Victoria 3086, Australia. [email protected]://www.latrobe.edu.au/philosophy/staff/edo.html

Abstract

The SIMS model claims that it is by means of an embodied simulation that we determine the meaning of an observed smile. This suggests that crucial interpretative work is done in the mapping that takes us from a perceived smile to the activation of one's own facial musculature. How is this mapping achieved? Might it depend upon a prior interpretation arrived at on the basis of perceptual and contextual information?

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Csibra, G. (2007) Action mirroring and action interpretation: An alternative account. In: The sensorimotor foundations of higher cognition. Attention and performance XXII, ed. Haggard, P., Rossetti, Y. & Kawato, M., pp. 435–59. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hennenlotter, A., Schroeder, U., Erhard, P., Catrop, F., Haslinger, B., Stoecker, D., Lange, K. W. & Ceballos-Baumann, A. O. (2005) A common neural basis for receptive and expressive communication of pleasant facial affect. NeuroImage 26:581–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed