Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-mggfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-17T12:59:47.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The precariat pandemic: Exploitation overshadowed by COVID-19 and workers’ strategies in Poland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Paweł Żuk Open the ORCID record for Paweł Żuk [Opens in a new window]  and
Piotr Żuk Open the ORCID record for Piotr Żuk [Opens in a new window]
Paweł Żuk
Affiliation:
Wrocław University of Economics, Wroclaw, Poland
Piotr Żuk*
Affiliation:
University of Wrocław, The Centre for Civil Rights and Democracy Research, Wroclaw, Poland
*
Piotr Żuk, The Centre for Civil Rights and Democracy Research, ul. Witkowska 17/1, Wrocław 51-003, Poland. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Based on the material obtained from focus group interviews conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, the article analyses the mechanisms used by employers towards employees, as well as the adaptation strategies applied by those in precarious employment in Poland. The authors’ considerations refer to anti-worker changes introduced under the pretext of the pandemic in the capitalist labour market: layoffs and cuts in wages, manifestations of discrimination against precarious workers and the potential attitudes of employee self-defence. The authors conclude that it is almost certain that under the conditions of post-pandemic capitalism, the number of the precariat will grow and the neoliberal system will want to retain as many of the anti-worker solutions introduced in the shadow of the pandemic as possible.

Keywords

precariatinequalitiescapitalismCOVID-19workers’ strategiesausterityclassJ70J81J28
Type
Contested Terrains
Information
The Economic and Labour Relations Review , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , March 2022 , pp. 200 - 223
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Azhar, S, Khan, D (2020) Rethinking informal labor in peripheral capitalism: the dynamics of surplus, market, and spatiality. Labor History 61(3–4): 320–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bieler, A, Salyga, J (2020) Baltic labour in the crucible of capitalist exploitation: reassessing ‘post-communist’ transformation. The Economic and Labour Relations Review 31(2): 191–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohle, D, Greskovits, B (2009) East-central Europe’s quandary. Journal of Democracy 20(4): 50–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonefeld, W (1995) The politics of debt. Common Sense 17: 69–91.Google Scholar
Cant, C, Woodcock, J (2020) Fast food shutdown: from disorganisation to action in the service sector. Capital and Class 44(4): 513–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chesters, J, Cuervo, H (2019) Adjusting to new employment landscapes: consequences of precarious employment for young Australians. The Economic and Labour Relations Review 30(2): 222–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chowdhury, A, Żuk, P (2018) From crisis to crisis: capitalism, chaos and constant unpredictability. The Economic and Labour Relations Review 29(4): 375–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devereux, H, Wadsworth, E (2020) Work scheduling and work location control in precarious and ‘permanent’ employment. The Economic and Labour Relations Review 32(2): 230–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorito, J, Gallagher, DG, Russell, ZA, et al. (2019) Precarious work, young workers, and union-related attitudes: distrust of employers, workplace collective efficacy, and union efficacy. Labor Studies Journal 46(1): 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gall, G (2020) Emerging forms of worker collectivism among the precariat: when will capital’s ‘gig’ be up? Capital and Class 44(4): 485–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauffin, K (2020) Precariousness on the Swedish labour market: a theoretical and empirical account. The Economic and Labour Relations Review 31(2): 279–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, J (2015) The institutional, structural and agential embeddedness of precarity. Warsaw Forum of Economic Sociology 6(11): 7–25.Google Scholar
Harvey, D (2020) Anti-capitalist politics in the time of COVID-19. Jacobin, 20 March. Available at: https://jacobinmag.com/2020/03/david-harvey-coronavirus-political-economy-disruptions (accessed 19 November 2021).Google Scholar
Horkheimer, M, Adorno, TW (2007) Dialectic of Enlightenment. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Itegboje, J, Chang, K (2021) Agency workers and their equivocal roles - wandering employees? Labor History 62(2): 115–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karolak, M (2020) Społeczno-ekonomiczne konteksty prekaryzacji pracy młodych w Polsce. In: Mrozowicki, A, Czarzasty, J (eds), Oswajanie niepewności. Studia społeczno-ekonomiczne nad młodymi pracownikami sprekaryzowanymi. Warszawa: Scholar, pp. 49–72.Google Scholar
Kearsey, J (2020) Control, camaraderie and resistance: precarious work and organisation in hospitality. Capital and Class 44(4): 503–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kılıç, S (2020) Does COVID-19 as a long wave turning point mean the end of neoliberalism? Critical Sociology 47(4–5): 609–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, E (2020) Contesting ‘bogus self-employment’ via legal mobilisation: the case of foster care workers. Capital and Class 44(4): 531–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, N (2007) The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism. Toronto, ON: Random House of Canada.Google Scholar
Larmer, M (2017) Permanent precarity: capital and labour in the Central African copperbelt. Labor History 58(2): 170–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohmeyer, BA, Taylor, N (2020) War, heroes and sacrifice: masking neoliberal violence during the COVID-19 pandemic. Critical Sociology 47(4–5): 625–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magyar, B, Vasarhelyi, J (eds), (2017) Twenty-Five Sides of a Post-Communist Mafia State. Budapest, Hungary: Central European University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzucato, M (2020) Capitalism after the Pandemic. Getting the Recovery Right. Foreign Affairs. November/December. Available at https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2020-10-02/capitalism-after-covid-19-pandemic (accessed 19 November 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meardi, G, Simms, M, Adam, D (2021) Trade unions and precariat in Europe: representative claims. European Journal of Industrial Relations 27(1): 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meardi, G, Trappmann, V (2013) Between consolidation and crisis: divergent pressures and sectoral trends in Poland. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research 19(2): 195–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, RK (1968) Social Theory and Social Structure. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Moore, S, Newsome, K (2018) Paying for free delivery: dependent self-employment as a measure of precarity in parcel delivery. Work, Employment and Society 32(3): 475–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mrozowicki, A, Trappmann, V (2020) Precarity as a biographical problem? Young workers living with precarity in Germany and Poland. Work, Employment and Society 35(2): 221–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murshed, SM (2020) Capitalism and COVID-19: crisis at the crossroads. Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy 26(3): 1–8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/peps-2020-0026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD [Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development] (2021) Hours worked (indicator). Available at: DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/47be1c78-en (accessed 19 November 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OPZZ (2020a) OPZZ W Sprawie Tarczy 3.0. Ogólnopolskie Porozumienie Związków Zawodowych. 27 April. Available at: https://www.opzz.org.pl/aktualnosci/kraj/opzz-w-sprawie-tarczy-3-0 (accessed 2 June 2021)Google Scholar
OPZZ (2020b) Tarcza Antykryzysowa 4.0. To Kolejny Zbiór Antypracowniczych Rozwiązań. Ogólnopolskie Porozumienie Związków Zawodowych. 26 May. Available at: https://www.opzz.org.pl/aktualnosci/kraj/tarcza-antykryzysowa-4-0-to-kolejny-zbior-antypracowniczych-rozwiazan (accessed 19 November 2021).Google Scholar
Orenstein, MA, Bugarič, B (2020) Work, family, Fatherland: the political economy of populism in central and Eastern Europe. Journal of European Public Policy: 1–20. Epub ahead of print 19 October. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1832557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ost, D (2018) Workers and the radical right in Poland. International Labor and Working-Class History 93: 113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OZZIP (2020) Związki Zawodowe Żądają Nowej Tarczy Antykryzysowej, Która Obroni Ludzi Pracy a Nie Jedynie Biznes. Ogólnopolski Związek Zawodowy Inicjatywa Pracownicza. 24 April. Available at https://www.ozzip.pl/dokumenty/oswiadczenia/item/2636-zwiazki-zadaja-nowej-tarczy-antykryzysowej-ktora-obroni-ludzi-pracy (accessed 19 Novemebr 2021).Google Scholar
Paret, M (2019) Building labor solidarity in precarious times: the danger of union paternalism. Labor Studies Journal 44(4): 314–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, WI (2020) Global capitalism post-pandemic. Race & Class 62(2): 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubery, J, Grimshaw, D, Keizer, A, et al. (2018) Challenges and contradictions in the ‘normalising’ of precarious work. Work, Employment and Society 32(3): 509–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saad-Filho, A (2020) From COVID-19 to the end of neoliberalism. Critical Sociology 46(4–5): 477–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sallai, D, Schnyder, G (2018) The Transformation of Post-Socialist Capitalism – from Developmental State to Clan State? No. GPERC57. Greenwich Paper in Political Economy. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3100775.Google Scholar
Scheiring, G (2020) Workers and neo-nationalism. In: Scheiring, G (ed), The Retreat of Liberal Democracy. Challenges to Democracy in the 21st Century. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 187–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sennett, R (1998) The Corrosion of Character: The Personal. Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism. London and New York: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Serwis Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej (2021) Tarcza antykryzysowa. Available at: https://www.gov.pl/web/tarczaantykryzysowa (accessed 19 November 2021).Google Scholar
Sheen, V (2017) The implications of Australian women’s precarious employment for the later pension age. The Economic and Labour Relations Review 28(1): 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shields, S (2019) The paradoxes of necessity: fail forwards neoliberalism, social reproduction, recombinant populism and Poland’s 500Plus policy. Capital and Class 43(4): 653–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shields, S (2021) Domesticating neoliberalism: ‘Domification’ and the contradictions of the populist countermovement in Poland. Europe-Asia Studies 73: 1622–1640. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2021.1972937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C, Pun, N (2018) Class and precarity: an unhappy coupling in China’s working class formation. Work, Employment and Society 32(3): 599–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Standing, G (2011) The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Stubbs, P, Lendvai‐Bainton, N (2020) Authoritarian neoliberalism, radical conservatism and social policy within the European Union: Croatia, Hungary and Poland. Development and Change 51(2): 540–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Šumonja, M (2021) Neoliberalism is not dead – On political implications of Covid-19. Capital and Class 45(2): 215–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, K (2019) The American precariat: US capitalism in comparative perspective. Perspectives on Politics 17(1): 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trappmann, V (2011) Precarious employment in Poland: a legacy of transition or an effect of European integration. Employment and Economy in Central and Eastern Europe (Emecon) 2(1): 1–22.Google Scholar
Urbański, J (2014) Prekariat i nowa walka Klas: przeobraż enia współczesnej klasy pracowniczej i jej form walki. Warszawa, Poland: Instytut Wydawniczy Książka i Prasa.Google Scholar
van Barneveld, K, Quinlan, M, Kriesler, P, et al. (2020) The COVID-19 pandemic: lessons on building more equal and sustainable societies. The Economic and Labour Relations Review 31(2): 133–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, V, Au-Yeung, TC (2019) Autonomous precarity or precarious autonomy? Dilemmas of young workers in Hong Kong. The Economic and Labour Relations Review 30(2): 241–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, AJ (2020) Beyond mobilisation at McDonald’s: towards networked organising. Capital and Class 44(4): 493–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, EO (2016) Is the precariat a class? Global Labour Journal 7(2): 123–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zafar Sheikh, A, Saleem Butt, A, Hussain, B, et al. (2021) Dodgy labour market dichotomy: the repercussions of sneaky labour intermediaries on employees’ constitutional rights. Labor History 62(1): 91–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Żuk, P (2007) Struktura a kultura. O uwarunkowaniach orientacji emancypacyjnych w społeczeństwie polskim. Warszawa, Poland: Scholar.Google Scholar
Żuk, P (2017) Employment structures, employee attitudes and workplace resistance in neoliberal Poland. The Economic and Labour Relations Review 28(1): 91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Żuk, P, Toporowski, J (2020) Capitalism after communism: the triumph of neoliberalism, nationalist reaction and waiting for the leftist wave. The Economic and Labour Relations Review 31(2): 158–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Żuk, P, Żuk, P (2018) Retirees without pensions and welfare: the social effects of pension privatization in Poland. Critical Social Policy 38(2): 407–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Żuk, P, Żuk, P, Lisiewicz-Jakubaszko, J (2019) Labour migration of doctors and nurses and the impact on the quality of health care in Eastern European countries: the case of Poland. The Economic and Labour Relations Review 30(2): 307–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar