Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:02:48.179Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Can alpine species take the heat? Impacts of increased temperatures on early life stages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2024

Alexandra E. Seglias*
Affiliation:
Department of Research and Conservation, Denver Botanic Gardens, 909 York Street, Denver, CO, USA
Michelle DePrenger-Levin
Affiliation:
Department of Research and Conservation, Denver Botanic Gardens, 909 York Street, Denver, CO, USA
*
Corresponding author: Alexandra E. Seglias; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Alpine plant species are particularly vulnerable to climate change. Temperature fluctuations are projected to be most severe at high elevations. Even small shifts in temperature have major consequences on phenology, reproduction, and community composition. Early life stages are arguably the most important processes in the fitness of an individual plant and the dynamics and persistence of plant populations. These initial developmental stages are expected to be more vulnerable to changes in climate than adult life stages. To understand how early life stages of alpine plant species will respond to warming temperatures, seeds and seedlings of two species were exposed to three different temperature regimes. Temperatures were based on current and projected conditions under low and high emission scenarios. Two rare alpine species performed better under warmer temperatures at both the germination and seedling stages. The results show that early life stages of alpine plants may not be at high risk from warming temperatures; however, there are many other shifting climatic factors to consider, resulting from climate change beyond temperature alone.

Type
Short Communication
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Climate change threatens plant biodiversity worldwide, but alpine plants are particularly vulnerable to climate change. Warming in alpine regions over recent decades has been outpacing the average global warming rate (Pepin et al., Reference Pepin, Bradley, Diaz, Baraer, Caceres, Forsythe, Fowler, Greenwood, Hashmi, Liu, Miller, Ning, Ohmura, Palazzi, Rangwala, Schöner, Severskiy, Shahgedanova, Wang, Williamson and Yang2015), with annual mean temperatures from 1961 to 2010 increasing about 1.2 times faster in high-elevation areas (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Fan and Wang2016). Warming in the alpine triggers earlier snowmelt, thereby advancing and increasing the length of the growing season (Inouye, Reference Inouye2008). Alpine plants have adapted to low temperatures, meaning that even a small increase in temperature may have a larger impact in high-elevation systems compared to less climatically extreme systems.

Early life stage processes (seed germination and seedling survival) are arguably the most important in population dynamics. Early life stages drive individual fitness, population persistence and the ability to disperse and establish in more suitable habitats. These initial developmental stages are expected to be more vulnerable to changes in climate than adult life stages (Walck et al., Reference Walck, Hidayati, Dixon, Thompson and Poschlod2011) and thereby represent a major bottleneck to recruitment and population responses as climate change increases in severity. Temperature is one of the most important climatic cues for germination because it signals that the environmental conditions are suitable for emergence and seedling establishment (Briceño et al., Reference Briceño, Hoyle and Nicotra2015). Climate change is altering temperature and other environmental cues that seeds need to germinate, impacting phenology, germination rate and seedling establishment.

Alpine species were thought to persist primarily through clonal reproduction. However, recent studies have shown that many alpine species reproduce sexually (Forbis, Reference Forbis2003; Schwienbacher et al., Reference Schwienbacher, Navarro-Cano, Neuner and Erschbamer2011; Fernández-Pascual et al., Reference Fernández-Pascual, Carta, Mondoni, Cavieres, Rosbakh, Venn, Satyanti, Guja, Briceño, Vandelook, Mattana, Saatkamp, Bu, Sommerville, Poschlod, Liu, Nicotra and Jiménez-Alfaro2020). Strict alpine plants are characterized by physiological seed dormancy, germination under warm temperatures, a positive response to alternating day/night temperatures and a positive response to light (Fernández-Pascual et al., Reference Fernández-Pascual, Carta, Mondoni, Cavieres, Rosbakh, Venn, Satyanti, Guja, Briceño, Vandelook, Mattana, Saatkamp, Bu, Sommerville, Poschlod, Liu, Nicotra and Jiménez-Alfaro2020). Most alpine species are classified as physiologically dormant, meaning that a period of cold is required to break dormancy and germinate (Schwienbacher et al., Reference Schwienbacher, Navarro-Cano, Neuner and Erschbamer2011; Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin2014; Gremer et al., Reference Gremer, Chiono, Suglia, Bontrager, Okafo and Schmitt2020). Alpine species disperse seeds in the autumn, which overwinter under insulated snow protection and germinate in the spring when environmental conditions are favourable for seedling survival (Rosbakh and Poschlod, Reference Rosbakh and Poschlod2015).

Rare and threatened species have additional constraints on distribution and survival. The niche-breadth hypothesis suggests that rarity is caused by a narrow range of habitats and environmental conditions required for persistence, thereby limiting their range (Slatyer et al., Reference Slatyer, Hirst and Sexton2013). Rare species, or those with a narrow niche breadth, are less tolerant to changes in climate than more widespread species (Vincent et al., Reference Vincent, Bornand, Kempel and Fischer2020). As the climate continues to change at an unprecedented rate, rare alpine species with narrow niches and sensitivity may be one of the most at-risk groups.

This study quantifies the impact of increasing temperatures on the germination and seedling stages of two rare alpine Colorado endemics. In knowing the impacts of warmer temperatures on early life stages, we can prioritize conservation actions for at-risk alpine species.

Materials and methods

Study area and species information

Seeds were collected from populations located in the Mosquito Range of the Colorado Rocky Mountains. These populations have shown an increase in an average maximum temperature of 1.5-2°C for June to August since 1986 (Fig. 1).

Figure. 1. Maximum temperature (°C) averaged over the months of June to August from 1986 to 2023 for the two seed collection sites.

Two endemic, rare alpine forb species were selected for this study: Physaria alpina Rollins (Brassicaceae; G2/S2) and Townsendia rothrockii A. Gray ex Rothrock (Asteraceae; G3/S3). Seeds of P. alpina were collected from Weston Pass in 2019 and seeds from T. rothrockii were collected from Boreas Pass in 2021. Vouchers were deposited in the Kathryn Kalmbach Herbarium at Denver Botanic Gardens. Seeds from P. alpina were stored in standard ex situ seed bank conditions (−20°C and 20% RH) for about 2 years prior to the start of the study, while seeds of T. rothrockii were stored at room temperature for about 6 months prior to the start of the experiment. Previous testing of these species found that stratification is necessary to break dormancy and that temperatures of at least 20/10°C (day/night) are required for high germination percentage (Seglias, Reference Seglias2022; unpublished data).

Germination experiment

Seeds were placed in sterile plastic Petri boxes containing 1.5% agar. Each box consisted of 25 seeds, with four replicates per treatment. Seeds were stratified (4°C) for 4 weeks (P. alpina) and 8 weeks (T. rothrockii). Following stratification, seeds were placed in climate-controlled incubators with three separate treatments: 20/10°C with an alternating 12 h light/12 h dark regime (control treatment); 22/12°C (+2 treatment as shown in figures) and 24/14°C (+4 treatment as shown in figures). The conditions of stratification and the control treatment were determined based on previous germination studies with these species (Seglias, Reference Seglias2022; unpublished data), while the conditions of the warming treatments are based on projected future emission scenarios for the area (Saunders et al., Reference Saunders, Easley and Mezger2021). Seeds remained in incubation conditions for 4 weeks and germination was evaluated weekly during this period. Seeds with radicle emergence were considered to have germinated, and those that did not germinate by the end of the treatment were subjected to a ‘cut test,’ and factored into a viability-adjusted germination (VAG) percentage.

Seedling experiment

Once the germinants produced their first true leaves, 50 individuals were transplanted to 5-inch-deep trays with a mix of 2 parts Lambert LM-HP soil, 2 parts perlite and 1 part turface. The trays were placed into the incubators at the same temperature and light conditions that the seeds experienced and were watered weekly. Measurements were taken every 2 weeks for 2 months on the number of leaves and the length of the longest leaf.

Statistical analysis

All germination analyses were performed on VAG (number of germinated seeds/number of viable seeds) using the R environment for statistical computing (R Core Team, 2023). To account for variable conditions between trials due to a refrigerator malfunction (increase in the temperature of ~10–12°C) during the stratification period of P. alpina in the second round of treatments (20/10 (2) and 24/14), the VAG of replicates in all treatments were centred and scaled. Once the mean was subtracted from the results and divided by their standard deviation, the control treatments were combined. The effects of treatment on germination and leaf length were analyzed using a Gaussian linear model, and the effects on the number of leaves were analyzed using a generalized linear model with Poisson error distribution. Binomial generalized linear models were used to measure the effect of treatment on survival.

Results

Germination of P. alpina increased by about 5% between the control treatment and the +2°C treatment, and by about 25% between the control and +4°C treatment (Fig. 2). There were no significant differences among treatments for T. rothrockii, with germination close to 100% across all conditions.

Figure. 2. Scaled and centred germination across treatments. Values shown include offset from the control and the standard error. If the standard error is larger than the offset, there is no significant difference between the control and treatment. +2 is the 22/12°C treatment and +4 is the 24/14°C treatment.

At the seedling stage, P. alpina showed significant differences in the number of leaves in the warmest treatment (+4°C) and the length of the longest leaf in the +2°C treatment (Fig. 3). There were no significant differences in the number of leaves among treatments for T. rothrockii, but there was a significant difference in the length of the longest leaf between the control and the +2°C treatment (Fig. 3).

Figure. 3. Final measurements of the number of leaves and the length of the longest leaf (cm) among treatments. Values shown include offset from the control and the standard error. If the standard error is larger than the offset, there is no significant difference between the control and treatment. The two control treatments (20/10°C) are combined. +2 is the 22/12°C treatment and +4 is the 24/14°C treatment.

There was a significant increase in the survival of seedlings for P. alpina as the temperature conditions warmed, with the highest survival in the +4°C treatment (Fig. 4). Survival increased by over 25% between the control treatment and the warmest treatment. There were no significant differences in survival among the treatments for T. rothrockii.

Figure. 4. Survival curves by treatment for the two species. Results are from the final data collection of the seedling growth period. Values shown include offset from the control and the standard error. If the standard error is larger than the offset, there is no significant difference between the control and treatment. The two control treatments (20/10°C) are combined. +2 is the 22/12°C treatment and +4 is the 24/14°C treatment.

Discussion

Effects on germination

Higher temperatures increased germination success for P. alpina and did not impact the germination of T. rothrockii. The germination proportion of T. rothrockii was consistently high, suggesting that increased temperatures will not be detrimental. For P. alpina on the other hand, there was a substantial increase in the germination proportion as temperatures increased. These results parallel others that have found that warmer temperatures increase germination in alpine species (e.g., Mondoni et al., Reference Mondoni, Jiménez-Alfaro, Cavieres, Baskin and Baskin2022). However, there could be negative impacts on germination if temperatures continue to increase beyond predictions for the next two decades.

Effects on seedling growth and survival

In general, warming had a neutral to positive effect on seedling vigour for both species. Leaf length increased for both species as temperatures warmed, and the number of leaves increased for P. alpina but remained constant across treatments for T. rothrockii. The number and size of leaves on a seedling influence the relative growth rate of plants (Fenner and Thompson, Reference Fenner and Thompson2005), suggesting that some warming could be beneficial to the establishment and survival of alpine plants. Furthermore, if alpine plants grow larger with increased warming, there may be a competitive advantage as low-elevation species move up and compete for resources (Grime, Reference Grime1979; Keddy et al., Reference Keddy, Nielsen, Weiher and Lawson2002).

Moderate warming increased the survival of P. alpina seedlings, while survival was constant for T. rothrockii across treatments. Since survival was high across all treatments, T. rothrockii is likely to have a wide niche breadth in response to variable environmental conditions. These results contradict studies that show warming has a negative effect on seedling survival (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Baskin, Baskin, Yang, Liu, Ye, Zhang and Huang2018; Vázquez-Ramírez and Venn, Reference Vázquez-Ramírez and Venn2021). However, results varied by species, suggesting an inconsistent response of seedling survival to warming.

Implications of increased temperatures

Despite the sensitivity of rare alpine species to climate change, the results of this study showed that increased temperatures did not have a negative effect on the germination and seedling growth of P. alpina or T. rothrockii. However, increased temperatures also alter season length, precipitation patterns and snowpack, which could all affect alpine plants. Additionally, there may exist a temperature threshold by which there are no longer beneficial, but rather detrimental effects to early life stages, or there may be negative effects at later life stages due to any one or a combination of these factors.

The understanding of the impacts of climate change on seed and seedling dynamics comes from a relatively small number of studies (N = 45; Mondoni et al., Reference Mondoni, Jiménez-Alfaro, Cavieres, Baskin and Baskin2022), which show varying effects based on the environmental factors, life stage, and habitat location. Therefore, our knowledge of how early life stages of alpine plants will respond is still limited. Despite evidence to suggest that early life stages of alpine plants may be able to survive certain impacts of climate change, rare alpine species are still at risk of extinction. Rare species typically already have a restricted range and require specific conditions for growth and survival, with little room to migrate or adapt (Vincent et al., Reference Vincent, Bornand, Kempel and Fischer2020). Reducing the uncertainty of the effects of environmental change on rare alpine populations is needed to implement conservation measures to prevent extinction.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Research and Conservation Department at Denver Botanic Gardens for helping with seed collection and providing feedback on this manuscript. This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Competing interest

The authors declare none.

References

Baskin, CC and Baskin, JM (2014) Seeds: Ecology, Biogeography, and Evolution of Dormancy and Germination. Second. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Briceño, VF, Hoyle, GL and Nicotra, AB (2015) Seeds at risk: how will a changing alpine climate affect regeneration from seeds in alpine areas? Alpine Botany 125, 5968. doi:10.1007/s00035-015-0155-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenner, M and Thompson, K (2005) The Ecology of Seeds. Cambridge: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Pascual, E, Carta, A, Mondoni, A, Cavieres, L, Rosbakh, S, Venn, S, Satyanti, A, Guja, L, Briceño, VF, Vandelook, F, Mattana, E, Saatkamp, A, Bu, H, Sommerville, K, Poschlod, P, Liu, K, Nicotra, A and Jiménez-Alfaro, B (2020) The seed germination spectrum of alpine plants: a global meta-analysis. New Phytologist 229, 35733587. doi:10.1111/nph.17086CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forbis, TA (2003) Seedling demography in an alpine ecosystem. American Journal of Botany 90, 11971206. doi:10.3732/ajb.90.8.1197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gremer, JR, Chiono, A, Suglia, E, Bontrager, M, Okafo, L and Schmitt, J (2020) Variation in the seasonal germination niche across an elevational gradient: the role of germination cueing in current and future climates. American Journal of Botany 107, 114. doi:10.1002/ajb2.1425CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grime, JP (1979) Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Inouye, DW (2008) Effects of climate change on phenology, frost damage, and floral abundance of montane wildflowers. Ecology 89, 353362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keddy, P, Nielsen, K, Weiher, E and Lawson, R (2002) Relative competitive performance of 63 species of terrestrial herbaceous plants. Journal of Vegetation Science 13, 516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondoni, A, Jiménez-Alfaro, B and Cavieres, LA (2022) Effect of climate change on plant regeneration from seeds in the arctic and alpine biome. In Baskin, C and Baskin, J (Eds) Plant Regeneration from Seeds, New York, Elsevier, pp. 318. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-823731-1.00007-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pepin, N, Bradley, RS, Diaz, HF, Baraer, M, Caceres, EB, Forsythe, N, Fowler, H, Greenwood, G, Hashmi, MZ, Liu, XD, Miller, JR, Ning, L, Ohmura, A, Palazzi, E, Rangwala, I, Schöner, W, Severskiy, I, Shahgedanova, M, Wang, MB, Williamson, SN and Yang, DQ (2015) Elevation-dependent warming in mountain regions of the world. Nature Climate Change 5, 424430. doi:10.1038/nclimate2563Google Scholar
R Core Team (2023) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Rosbakh, S and Poschlod, P (2015) Initial temperature of seed germination as related to species occurrence along a temperature gradient. Functional Ecology 29, 514. doi:10.1111/1365-2435.12304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, S, Easley, T and Mezger, M (2021) Climate Projections in Summit County, Colorado. Almont: The Rocky Mountain Climate Organization.Google Scholar
Schwienbacher, E, Navarro-Cano, JA, Neuner, G and Erschbamer, B (2011) Seed dormancy in alpine species. Flora: Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants 206, 845856. doi:10.1016/j.flora.2011.05.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seglias, AE (2022) Can alpine plant species “bank” on conservation? Using artificial aging to understand seed longevity. Applications in Plant Sciences 10, e11493. doi:10.1002/aps3.11493CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slatyer, RA, Hirst, M and Sexton, JP (2013) Niche breadth predicts geographical range size: a general ecological pattern. Ecology Letters 16, 11041114. doi:10.1111/ele.12140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vázquez-Ramírez, J and Venn, SE (2021) Seeds and seedlings in a changing world: a systematic review and meta-analysis from high altitude and high latitude ecosystems. Plants 10, 768. doi:10.3390/plants10040768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincent, H, Bornand, CN, Kempel, A and Fischer, M (2020) Rare species perform worse than widespread species under changed climate. Biological Conservation 246, 108586. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walck, JL, Hidayati, SN, Dixon, KW, Thompson, K and Poschlod, P (2011) Climate change and plant regeneration from seed. Global Change Biology 17, 21452161. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02368.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Q, Fan, X and Wang, M (2016) Evidence of high-elevation amplification versus Arctic amplification. Scientific Reports 6, 19219. doi:10.1038/srep19219CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, G, Baskin, CC, Baskin, JM, Yang, X, Liu, G, Ye, X, Zhang, X and Huang, Z (2018) Effects of climate warming and prolonged snow cover on phenology of the early life history stages of four alpine herbs on the southeastern Tibetan Plateau. American Journal of Botany 105, 967976. doi:10.1002/ajb2.1104CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure. 1. Maximum temperature (°C) averaged over the months of June to August from 1986 to 2023 for the two seed collection sites.

Figure 1

Figure. 2. Scaled and centred germination across treatments. Values shown include offset from the control and the standard error. If the standard error is larger than the offset, there is no significant difference between the control and treatment. +2 is the 22/12°C treatment and +4 is the 24/14°C treatment.

Figure 2

Figure. 3. Final measurements of the number of leaves and the length of the longest leaf (cm) among treatments. Values shown include offset from the control and the standard error. If the standard error is larger than the offset, there is no significant difference between the control and treatment. The two control treatments (20/10°C) are combined. +2 is the 22/12°C treatment and +4 is the 24/14°C treatment.

Figure 3

Figure. 4. Survival curves by treatment for the two species. Results are from the final data collection of the seedling growth period. Values shown include offset from the control and the standard error. If the standard error is larger than the offset, there is no significant difference between the control and treatment. The two control treatments (20/10°C) are combined. +2 is the 22/12°C treatment and +4 is the 24/14°C treatment.