Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T23:37:57.253Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Frailty and Malnutrition in a cohort of Irish community–dwelling older adults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 May 2021

M.L. O'Connell
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Munster Technological University, Rossa Avenue, Bishopstown, Cork, Republic of Ireland
T. Coppinger
Affiliation:
Department of Sport, Leisure and Childhood Studies, Munster Technological University, Rossa Avenue, Bishopstown, Cork, Republic of Ireland
A.L. McCarthy
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Munster Technological University, Rossa Avenue, Bishopstown, Cork, Republic of Ireland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2021

Frailty and malnutrition are widespread syndromes in older adults, and are both linked to increased risk for dependency, hospitalisation and mortality(Reference Hébert1). Evidence suggests that these conditions share common causal factors and physiological pathways, such as body composition changes and loss of tissue mass (Reference Jeejeebhoy2). The objectives of this study were to investigate the prevalence of, and association between, frailty and malnutrition, in addition to factors associated with each condition, in a cohort of Irish adults aged ≥65 years.

A total of 142 community-dwelling older volunteers (n = 81 female, n = 61 male, 74.1 ± 6.80 years) were recruited to participate through advertisement in community settings in Cork, Ireland (March-August, 2019). Community-based screening sessions were held for those eligible, where frailty, nutritional status and dietary variables were measured. Frailty was classified according to the Frailty Phenotype, described as ≥3 (or 1–2 for pre-frailty) of the following features; weakness, exhaustion, low activity, slowness and weight loss. Nutritional status was assessed using the Mini Nutritional Assessment – Short Form (MNA-SF). Supplement use and intake of protein (%E) and alcohol (g) were recorded using a validated Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ). Pearson's chi-squared test and logistic regression analysis were performed to investigate the association between frailty, malnutrition and demographic and dietary variables. Ethical approval was obtained from C.I.T. Research Ethics Committee, Cork, Ireland.

The prevalence of pre-frailty and frailty in this cohort were 34.5% and 12.0%, respectively. Only one participant was malnourished, thus, those who were malnourished and at risk of malnutrition were grouped together for analysis, resulting in a prevalence of 19.7%. Although not statistically significant (p >0.05), compared to males, females were more likely to be malnourished/at risk (22.0% vs 16.4%), and more likely to be pre-frail or frail (50.6% vs 41.0%). 75.0% of those at risk of malnutrition were also pre-frail or frail, compared to only 39.5% of those who were well-nourished (p <0.001). Use of dietary supplements decreased the risk for malnutrition [odds ratio (OR) (95% CI): 0.19 (0.04–0.68), p = 0.021], while being pre-frail or frail (compared to non-frail) increased the risk for malnutrition [OR: 5.06 (1.82–15.56), p = 0.003]. Increasing age, being malnourished/at risk (compared to well-nourished) and having a low protein intake were associated with an increased frailty risk [OR: 1.16 (1.10–1.23), 5.83 (2.36–14.95) and 2.93 (1.16–7.62), respectively, all p <0.05].

Our study revealed a frailty prevalence of 12.0% in this cohort, while 19.7% were malnourished or at risk of malnutrition. Despite a divergence in risk factors, and a proven ability to exist independently, a significant overlap exists between frailty and malnutrition. The direction of this association remains unclear, however, and warrants further exploration. Nonetheless, nutritional considerations are important for the development of strategies to reduce/prevent frailty.

References

Hébert, R (2017) JAMDA 18, 1019–28.Google Scholar
Jeejeebhoy, KN (2012) Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 15, 213–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar