Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T17:28:24.665Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Entrepreneurial History in Motion: A Reply to R. Daniel Wadhwani’s Comment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 July 2020

LOUIS GALAMBOS  and
FRANCO AMATORI
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Galambos and Amatori applaud this discourse over entrepreneurship but contend that the multiplier is not a metaphor. They acknowledge Wadhwani’s insightful analyses and look forward to further fruitful discussions focused on innovation, capitalism’s major strength. They briefly argue for scalar evaluations rather than binary evaluations of innovation and the socio-economic problems they inevitably create.

Type
Reply
Information
Enterprise & Society , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , June 2020 , pp. 340 - 342
Copyright
© The Author 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Business History Conference. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography of Works Cited

Galambos, Louis, and Amatori, Franco. “The Entrepreneurial Multiplier Effect.” Enterprise & Society 17, no. 4 (2016): 763–808.10.1017/eso.2016.41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wadhwani, R. Daniel. “Gales, Streams, and Multipliers: Conceptual Metaphors in Entrepreneurial History.” Enterprise & Society 21, no. 1 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galambos, Louis, and Amatori, Franco. “The Entrepreneurial Multiplier Effect.” Enterprise & Society 17, no. 4 (2016): 763–808.10.1017/eso.2016.41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wadhwani, R. Daniel. “Gales, Streams, and Multipliers: Conceptual Metaphors in Entrepreneurial History.” Enterprise & Society 21, no. 1 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar