No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
How does consciousness for action relate to attention for action?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 November 2016
Abstract
The interesting target article by Morsella et al. addresses critical issues that impact our understanding of consciousness. It is surprising, however, to see no treatment of the relationship between attention and consciousness, particularly given available models. Whether olfaction is most suitable as a model system to study consciousness for action also seems questionable. These issues are elaborated in the present commentary.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016
References
Bednark, J. G. & Franz, E. A. (2014) Agency attribution: Event-related potentials and outcome monitoring. Experimental Brain Research
232:1117–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bednark, J. G., Reynolds, J. N. J, Stafford, T., Redgrave, P. & Franz, E. A. (2013) Creating a movement heuristic for voluntary action: Electrophysiological correlates of movement-outcome learning. Cortex
49(3):771–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franz, E. A. (1997) Spatial coupling in the coordination of complex actions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A
50A:684–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franz, E. A. (2003) Bimanual action representation: A window to human evolution. In: Taking action: Cognitive neuroscience perspectives on intentional acts, ed. Johnston-Frey, S. H., pp. 259–88. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franz, E. A. (2006) Converging evidence of the basal ganglia's role in focused action selection and inhibition of competing information. In: Recent breakthroughs in basal ganglia research, ed. Bezard, E., Ch. 18, pp. 227–39. Nova Science.Google Scholar
Franz, E. A. (2010) A framework for conceptual binding of bimanual actions: Possible applications to neurology and neuro-rehabilitative therapies. Current Trends in Neurology
4:1–22.Google Scholar
Franz, E. A. (2012) The allocation of attention to learning of goal-directed actions: A cognitive neuroscience framework focusing on the basal ganglia. Frontiers in Psychology 3, article 535:1–15. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00535.Google Scholar
Franz, E. A., Eliassen, J., Ivry, R. B. & Gazzaniga, M. S. (1996) Dissociation of spatial and temporal coupling in the bimanual movements of callosotomy patients. Psychological Science
7:306–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franz, E. A. & Gillett, G. (2011) John Hughlings Jackson's evolutionary neurology: A unifying framework for cognitive neuroscience. Brain
134(10):3114–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franz, E. A. & McCormick, R. (2010) Conceptual unifying constraints on anticipatory bimanual control. Experimental Brain Research
205(2):273–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franz, E. A. & Ramachandran, V. S. (1998) Bimanual coupling in amputees with phantom limbs. Nature Neuroscience
1:443–44. doi:10.1038/2161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franz, E. A., Waldie, K. & Smith, M. (2000) The effect of callosotomy on novel versus familiar bimanual actions: A neural dissociation between controlled and automatic processes?
Psychological Science
11(1):82–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franz, E. A., Zelaznik, H. N. & McCabe, G. (1991) Spatial topological constraints in a bimanual task. Acta Psychologica
77(2):137–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franz, E. A., Zelaznik, H. N., Swinnen, S. & Walter, C. (2001) Spatial conceptual influences on the coordination of bimanual actions: When a dual task becomes a single task. Journal of Motor Behavior
33(1):103–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillett, G. & Franz, E. A. (2013) John Hughlings Jackson: Bridging theory and clinical observation. The Lancet
381(9866):528–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottfried, J. A. & Dolan, R. J. (2003) The nose smells what the eye sees: Crossmodal visual facilitation of human olfactory perception. Neuron
39(2):375–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenwald, A. G. (1972) On doing two things at once: Time sharing as a function of ideomotor compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology
94(1):52–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grossberg, S. (1999) The link between brain learning, attention, and consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition
8(1):1–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hommel, B. (2010) Grounding attention in action control: The intentional control of selection. In: Effortless attention: A new perspective in the cognitive science of attention and action, ed. Bruya, B. J., pp. 121–40. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, C. M. L. & Franz, E. A. (2007) Experience-dependent effects in unimanual and bimanual reaction time tasks in musicians. Journal of Motor Behavior
39(1):3–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughlings Jackson, J. (1884) On affectations of speech from disease of the brain (Part 2). British Medical Journal
12:703–707.Google Scholar
James, W. (1890/1918) The principles of psychology, vols. 1 and 11. Dover. (Original work published in 1890).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, A. (2011) Attention and olfactory consciousness. Frontiers in Psychology
2, article 380. (Online journal). doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelso, J. A. S., Southard, D. L. & Goodman, D. (1979) On the nature of human interlimb coordination. Science
203(4384):1029–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laing, D. G. (1983) Natural sniffing gives optimum odour perception for humans. Perception
12:99–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mainland, J. D. & Sobel, N. (2006) The sniff is part of the olfactory percept. Chemical Senses
31:181–96.Google Scholar
Mink, J. W. (1996) The basal ganglia: Focused selection and inhibition of competing motor programs. Progress in Neurobiology
50:381–425.Google Scholar
Shen, Y. C. & Franz, E. A. (2005) Hemispheric competition in left-handers on bimanual reaction time tasks. Journal of Motor Behavior
37:3–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sperry, R. W. (1952) Neurology and the mind-brain problem. American Scientist
40:291–312.Google Scholar
Tassinari, G. & Berlucchi, G. (1993) Sensory and attentional components of slowing of manual reaction time to non-fixated visual targets by ipsilateral primes. Vision Research
33(11):1525–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Target article
Homing in on consciousness in the nervous system: An action-based synthesis
Related commentaries (30)
Action-based synthesis of parental brain consciousness
An “ecological” action-based synthesis
At what timescale does consciousness operate?
Calling for a developmental perspective on action-based consciousness
Can skeletomotor action integration occur without consciousness? Evidence from unconscious action inhibition
Conflicts everywhere! Perceptions, actions, and cognition all entail memory and reflect conflict
Conscious content generated by unconscious action-related adjustments
Conscious olfaction: Content, function, and localization
Consciousness around the time of saccadic eye movements
Consciousness for perception and for action: A perspective from unconscious binding
Consciousness of emotions and action selection
Consciousness weaves our internal view of the outside world
Content encapsulation in consciousness is likely to be incomplete
Explaining consciousness: From correlations to foundations
Four questions for passive frame theory
Getting back from the basics: What is the role for attention and fronto-parietal circuits in consciousness?
Heavy objects and small children: Developmental data extend the passive frame theory
Homing in on consciousness: Why is a dream conscious?
How does consciousness for action relate to attention for action?
Human consciousness is fundamental for perception and highest emotions
Infer yourself: Interoception and internal “action” in conscious selfhood
Insights on consciousness from taste memory research
Is conscious content available only to the skeletal muscle system?
Locating consciousness: We are conflicted by the role of conflict
Metacognition and conscious experience
Origins of emotional consciousness
The chemosensory brain requires a distributed cellular mechanism to harness information and resolve conflicts – is consciousness the forum?
The primary (dis)function of consciousness: (Non)Integration
The science of consciousness must include its more advanced forms
What if consciousness has no function?
Author response
Passive frame theory: A new synthesis