Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T03:37:28.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of central-line–associated bloodstream infections between central venous catheters lined by combined chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine versus silver ionotrophes alone: A before–after–before retrospective study — CORRIGENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2020

Youssef Z. Abouleish
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia
Edward C. Oldfield
Affiliation:
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
Paul E. Marik
Affiliation:
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Corrigendum
Copyright
© 2020 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.

In the above mentioned article, Table 1 contains an error regarding the second period for CHSS. The correct Table 1 appears below.

Table 1. Results

Note. CHSS, chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine lined catheters; SI, silver ionotrophe-lined catheters.

a Per 1,000 central line.

b The incidence rate ratio of the CHSS versus SI catheters was 0.2318 (95% CI, 0.06216–0.7443; P = .004).

References

Abouleish, YZ, Oldfield, EC, Marik, PE. Comparison of central-line–associated bloodstream infections between central venous catheters lined by combined chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine versus silver ionotrophes alone: A before–after–before retrospective study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020 September 11 [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1017/ice.2020.423 Google ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Results