Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:43:48.646Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Foreign to whom? Constraining the moral foreign language effect on bilinguals’ language experience – CORRIGENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2022

Nicola Del Maschio ,
Gianpaolo Del Mauro ,
Camilla Bellini ,
Jubin Abutalebi  and
Simone Sulpizio
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Keywords

foreign language effectbilingualismmoral decision-makingindividual differencescorrigendum
Type
Corrigendum
Information
Language and Cognition , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , December 2022 , pp. 696 - 697
Check for updates
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

This article was originally published with an error in Figure 1. In the first version of the article, the participants’ responses in each language condition had mistakenly been switched. This error has now been corrected in the article and this corrigendum published. The updated figure is below.

Fig. 1. The percentage of utilitarian responses (left panels), the mean permissibility of the moral violation (central panels), and the mean emotional distress (right panels) are reported for each scenario (A = Surgeon, B = Factory, C = Bike week) and for language condition (FL = foreign language – N = 98; NL = native language – N = 96). Significant differences between language conditions are marked with an asterisk (p < 0.05).

References

Del Maschio, N., Del Mauro, G., Bellini, C., Abutalebi, J. & Sulpizio, S. (2022). Foreign to whom? Constraining the moral foreign language effect on bilinguals’ language experience. Language and Cognition 14: 511–533. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2022.14Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. The percentage of utilitarian responses (left panels), the mean permissibility of the moral violation (central panels), and the mean emotional distress (right panels) are reported for each scenario (A = Surgeon, B = Factory, C = Bike week) and for language condition (FL = foreign language – N = 98; NL = native language – N = 96). Significant differences between language conditions are marked with an asterisk (p < 0.05).