Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T19:17:15.958Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Shadow banning, astroturfing, catfishing, and other online conflicts where beliefs about group membership diverge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2022

Jordan W. Suchow Open the ORCID record for Jordan W. Suchow [Opens in a new window]
Jordan W. Suchow*
Affiliation:
School of Business, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA [email protected]; http://suchow.io
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Drawing from conflicts observed in online communities (e.g., astroturfing and shadow banning), I extend Pietraszewski's theory to accommodate phenomena dependent on the intersubjectivity of groups, where representations of group membership (or beliefs about group membership) diverge. Doing so requires enriching representations to include other agents and their beliefs in a process of recursive mentalizing.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 45 , 2022 , e122
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cole, S. (2018). Where did the concept of “shadow banning” come from? Motherboard: Tech by Vice. https://www.vice.com/en/article/a3q744/where-did-shadow-banning-come-from-trump-republicans-shadowbanned.Google Scholar
de Freitas, J., Thomas, K., DeScioli, P., & Pinker, S. (2019). Common knowledge, coordination, and strategic mentalizing in human social life. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(28), 13751–13758.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dennen, V. P., & Wieland, K. (2007). From interaction to intersubjectivity: Facilitating online group discourse processes. Distance Education, 28(3), 281–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eden, C., Jones, S., Sims, D., & Smithin, T. (1981). The intersubjectivity of issues and issues of intersubjectivity. Journal of Management Studies, 18(1), 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frith, C., & Frith, U. (2005). Theory of mind. Current Biology, 15(17), R644–R645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leiser, M. (2016). AstroTurfing, “CyberTurfing” and other online persuasion campaigns. European Journal of Law and Technology, 7(1), 1–27.Google Scholar
Matusov, E. (1996). Intersubjectivity without agreement. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(1), 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platow, M. J., Foddy, M., Yamagishi, T., Lim, L. I., & Chow, A. (2012). Two experimental tests of trust in in-group strangers: The moderating role of common knowledge of group membership. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(1), 30–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sisson, D. C. (2017). Inauthentic communication, organization-public relationships, and trust: A content analysis of online astroturfing news coverage. Public Relations Review, 43(4), 788–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stahl, G. (2016). From intersubjectivity to group cognition. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 25(4), 355–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, K. A., De Freitas, J., DeScioli, P., & Pinker, S. (2016). Recursive mentalizing and common knowledge in the bystander effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(5), 621–629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
waxpancake. (2009). What was the first website to hide troll's activity to everyone but the troll himself? Ask MetaFilter. https://ask.metafilter.com/117775/.Google Scholar
Zhang, J., Carpenter, D., & Ko, M. (2013). Online astroturfing: A theoretical perspective. AMCIS 2013.Google Scholar
Zlatev, J. (2014). The co-evolution of human intersubjectivity, morality and language. In The social origins of language (pp. 249–266). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar