Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-qdpjg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-20T08:11:52.892Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Staphylococcus aureus colonization and surgical site infections among patients undergoing surgical fixation for acute fractures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2025

Megan Ahmann
Affiliation:
State Hygienic Laboratory at the University of Iowa, Coralville, IA, USA Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA, USA
Jocelyn Compton
Affiliation:
Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA Orthopedic + Fracture Specialists, Portland, OR, USA
Jean Pottinger
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA
Richard Uhlenhopp
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
Melissa Ward
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA
Ambar Haleem
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
Michael Willey
Affiliation:
Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA
Marin Schweizer
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
Loreen Herwaldt*
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA, USA Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA
*
Corresponding author: Loreen Herwaldt; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives:

To identify risk factors for methicillin-susceptible (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) nasal carriage and surgical site infection (SSI) among patients undergoing fracture fixation procedures who were included in a quality improvement protocol involving screening patients for S. aureus nasal carriage and treating carriers with intranasal mupirocin and chlorhexidine bathing.

Design:

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting:

Level 1 trauma center.

Participants:

1,254 adults who underwent operative fixation of 1,298 extremity or pelvis fractures between 8/1/2014 – 7/31/2017.

Methods:

We calculated rates of S. aureus nasal carriage and SSI. We used multivariable stepwise logistic regression and selected the final models based on Akaike information criterion.

Results:

Of the 1,040 screened first procedures, 262 (25.19%) were performed on S. aureus nasal carriers: 211 (20.29%) on MSSA carriers and 51 (4.90%) on MRSA carriers. Long-term care facility residence (odds ratio [OR] 3.38; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17–9.76) was associated with MRSA nasal carriage. After adjusting for statistically and clinically significant variables, MRSA carriage was significantly associated with any SSI (OR 4.58; 95% CI 1.63–12.88), S. aureus SSI (OR 10.11; 95% CI 3.25–31.42), and MRSA SSI (OR 27.25; 95% CI 5.33–139.24), whereas MSSA carriage was not. Among S. aureus carriers, any chlorhexidine use was documented for 232 (88.55%), and any intranasal mupirocin was documented for 85 (40.28%) MSSA carriers and 33 (64.71%) MRSA carriers.

Conclusions:

MRSA carriage was associated with a significant risk of SSI after operative fracture fixation. Many carriers did not undergo decolonization, suggesting that a simplified decolonization protocol is needed.

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that no alterations are made and the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained prior to any commercial use and/or adaptation of the article.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus is a common cause of surgical site infections (SSI) after surgical fixation of acute fractures.Reference Morris, Unger, Archer, Mathis, Perdue and Obremskey1Reference Montalvo, Natoli and O’Hara4 S. aureus nasal carriage increases the risk for SSI,Reference Kalmeijer, van Nieuwland-Bollen, Bogaers-Hofman and de Baere5,Reference Baratz, Hallmark, Odum and Springer6 and decolonization of S. aureus carriers can reduce the risk of SSI after elective orthopedic surgery.Reference Schweizer, Perencevich and McDanel7Reference Bebko, Green and Awad10 Few orthopedic trauma programs either screen patients for S. aureus carriage or decolonize carriers.Reference Shaw, Whalen and Mitchell11Reference Shukla, Nixon, Acharya, Korim and Pandey13 In addition, few studies have assessed S. aureus nasal carriage rates and the association of S. aureus nasal carriage with SSI or wound healing complications among patients undergoing operative fixation for acute fractures.Reference Shaw, Whalen and Mitchell11,Reference Urias, Varghese, Simunich, Morrissey and Dumire12 Moreover, the effectiveness of decolonization has not been assessed thoroughly among patients with orthopedic trauma, given in part because the time period from the injuries to the fracture fixations is short.

We implemented a quality improvement intervention that involved screening patients for S. aureus and decolonizing carriers with intranasal mupirocin and chlorhexidine bathing to decrease rates of S. aureus SSI and wound healing complications among adults undergoing operative fixation of acute pelvis or extremity fractures at a Level 1 trauma center. We aimed to determine the rate of S. aureus nasal carriage, identify risk factors for S. aureus carriage in this population, and assess if S. aureus nasal carriage was associated with an increased risk of SSI or wound healing complications. We also assessed compliance with the quality improvement intervention.

Methods

From 8/1/2014 to 7/31/2017, we implemented a quality improvement protocol that involved screening consecutive patients aged 18 years and older for S. aureus nasal carriage and decolonization of carriers before they underwent operative fixation of acute pelvis or extremity fractures by one of three fellowship-trained orthopedic trauma surgeons at Iowa Health Care, a Level 1 trauma center. For patients with multiple surgical procedures, we included only the first operation during the study period on each included body region. The University of Iowa Institutional Review Board prospectively approved both the quality improvement initiative and the retrospective cohort study.

Patients were screened for S. aureus nasal carriage in the emergency department, after admission to an inpatient ward, or during orthopedic clinic visits when the patients were indicated for operative fixation. Trained nursing staff swabbed patients’ nares with a dual-headed Copan swab (COPAN Diagnostics Inc., Murrieta, CA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Swabs were submitted to the on-site clinical microbiology laboratory for polymerase chain reaction testing to identify methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) (Cepheid Inc., Sunnyvale, CA).Reference Patel, Schora, Peterson, Grayes, Boehm and Peterson14

Quality improvement intervention

Patients who did not carry S. aureus were to bathe or shower with chlorhexidine the night before and the morning of their procedures; patients who were colonized with MSSA or MRSA were instructed to apply mupirocin to their nares twice daily for five days and to bathe or shower with chlorhexidine once daily for five days before their operations. Surgical interventions were not delayed if the decolonization protocol was not completed.

Patients who were colonized with MSSA were to receive cefazolin for perioperative prophylaxis and those who were colonized with MRSA or whose carrier status was unknown at the time of surgery were to receive both cefazolin and vancomycin in accordance with guidelines.Reference Bratzler, Dellinger and Olsen15

Retrospective cohort study

We collected information from the patients’ electronic medical records about age, gender, body mass index (BMI), co-morbidities, residence at a long-term care facility (LTCF), injury severity score (ISS),Reference Baker, O’Neill, Haddon and Long16 open fractures, Gustilo-Anderson classification,Reference Gustilo and Anderson17 type of operative intervention, S. aureus nasal carriage status, antibiotic prophylaxis, compliance with the intervention, essential dates (injury, admission, procedure, discharge), and duration of follow up. We also extracted the information necessary to identify both SSI, as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN),Reference Mangram, Horan, Pearson, Silver and Jarvis18,19 and wound healing complications, as defined by the Clavien-Dindo classification system.Reference Goitein, Raziel, Szold and Sakran20

We used SAS software (version 9.4, SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina) and VassarStats (Vassar College, New York) to analyze the data. For the bivariable analyses, we used Chi-squared and Fisher’s exact tests (categorical variables) and two-sample t-tests (continuous variables), and we used 2x2 tables or logistic regression, when appropriate, to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). To adjust for clinically and statistically significant variables, we used multivariable stepwise logistic regression and selected the final models based on Akaike information criterion. We considered p-values less than .05 to be significant.

Results

S. aureus colonization

The study included 1,254 adults who underwent 1,298 first operative fixation procedures of acute pelvis or extremity fractures during the study period. Of the 1,254 patients, 1,001 (79.82%) were screened for S. aureus colonization, of whom 202 (20.18%) patients were colonized with MSSA and 47 (4.70%) were colonized with MRSA.

The 1,001 screened patients underwent 1,040 first procedures. Of these procedures, 211 (20.29%) were performed on MSSA carriers and 51 (4.90%) on MRSA carriers. The following characteristics were more common among patients who were screened than those who were not (n = 253): male sex (P = .0083), mean age of 53 years (P = .0002), malnutrition (P = .0011), heart disease (P < .0001), open fractures (P < .0001), and an ISS > 15 (P < .0001).

Risk factors for S. aureus colonization

Bivariable analyses of data from the entire cohort of 1,298 first procedures found that any S. aureus carriage (MSSA or MRSA) was significantly associated with diabetes and residence in an LTCF (Table 1), but other variables were not. Male gender was the only variable significantly associated with MSSA colonization, whereas older age, diabetes, heart disease, renal disease, and LTCF residence were associated with MRSA carriage (Table 1). The results were similar when we excluded patients whose carrier status was unknown (Supplemental Table 1). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that LTCF residence (OR 3.38; 95% CI 1.17–9.76) was significantly associated with MRSA nasal carriage.

Table 1. Bivariable analyses of factors associated with Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage

Note. S. aureus, Staphylococcus aureus; MSSA, methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus; MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; BMI, body mass index; THC, tetrahydrocannabinol; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus.

Compliance with perioperative prophylaxis quality improvement protocol

Patients known to carry MSSA (211) received cefazolin (185; 87.68%), vancomycin (3; 1.42%), cefazolin and vancomycin (21; 9.95%), or neither agent (2; 0.95%) perioperatively. Patients known to carry MRSA (51) received cefazolin (27; 52.94%), vancomycin (3; 5.88%), or both (21; 41.18%) perioperatively. Patients whose S. aureus carriage status was unknown (258) received cefazolin (234; 90.70%), vancomycin (5; 1.94%), both cefazolin and vancomycin (10; 3.88%), or neither agent (9; 3.49%) perioperatively. Patients who carried MSSA were significantly more likely to receive the recommended perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis than those who carried MRSA (P <.0001) or patients whose carriage status was unknown (P< .0001). The S. aureus decolonization protocol required 5 days to complete, but 198 (75.57%) procedures performed on S. aureus carriers occurred 4 or fewer days after injury onset. At least 1 dose of mupirocin was documented for 85 (40.28%) procedures performed on known MSSA carriers and 33 (64.71%) procedures performed on known MRSA carriers. A preoperative chlorhexidine bath was recorded for 186 (88.15%) procedures performed on known MSSA carriers and 46 (90.20%) procedures performed on known MRSA carriers. We did not assess the effectiveness of the decolonization protocol because medical record documentation of mupirocin use was limited.

Surgical site infections: descriptive analyses

We identified 34 SSIs (Table 2) after the 1,298 first procedures, for an overall rate of 2.62%. Of the SSI, 11 (32.35%) were superficial incisional, 13 (38.24%) were deep incisional, and 10 (29.41%) were organ space. The mean duration of clinical follow up was 361.09 days (15–1,292) for procedures complicated by any SSI and 250.43 days (0–1,254) for procedures without SSI. Overall, the follow up period after the initial procedure was 30 days or less for 163 patients (12.56%) and 90 days or less for 380 patients (29.28%).

Table 2. Bivariable analyses to identify variables associated with surgical site infections as defined by the National Healthcare Safety Network

Note. Injury severity score, https://www.mdcalc.com/calc/1239/injury-severity-score-iss; S. aureus, Staphylococcus aureus; SSI, surgical site infection; MSSA, methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus; MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; BMI, body mass index; THC, tetrahydrocannabinol.

Of the 34 SSIs, 28 (82.35%) occurred after the 1,040 first procedures among patients who were screened for S. aureus nasal carriage, for an SSI rate of 2.69%. Six SSIs occurred after 258 procedures among the 253 unscreened patients, for an SSI rate of 2.33% (P = .74; Figure 1). Eighteen of 34 (52.94%) SSIs were caused by S. aureus (9 MSSA, 8 MRSA, and 1 MSSA and MRSA). The rates of all S. aureus SSI, MSSA SSI, and MRSA SSI were 1.39%, 0.77%, and 0.69%, respectively. Four (11.76%) SSIs were caused by gram-negative bacteria, 2 (5.88%) by coagulase-negative staphylococci species, and 5 (14.71%) were polymicrobial. Of the 5 (14.71%) SSIs that were not cultured, 4 (80.00%) were superficial and 1 was deep incisional. Seven of 9 (77.78%) MSSA SSI occurred in screened patients, only 1 of whom (11.11%) carried this organism. All 8 MRSA SSIs occurred among screened patients, 5 (62.50%) of which occurred in S. aureus carriers: 1 MSSA carrier and 4 MRSA carriers. The patient whose SSI was caused by both MSSA and MRSA did not carry either organism in her nares.

Figure 1. Study Population. Note. SA, Staphylococcus aureus; MSSA, methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus; MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; SSI, surgical site infection.*Eighteen procedures had S. aureus surgical site infections. The figure includes 1 screened procedure twice because the patient was infected with both MRSA and MSSA.

Bivariable analysis of risk factors for surgical site infections

Bivariable analyses of data from the cohort of 1,298 first procedures found that neither the Gustilo-Anderson open fracture classification nor the ISS score were significantly associated with SSI (Table 2). Tobacco use, alcohol use disorder, and MRSA nasal carriage were significantly associated with SSI caused by any organism (Table 2). Internal fixation alone was associated with a decreased risk of any SSI but staged internal fixation after external fixation was associated with an increased risk (Table 2).

When we controlled for open versus closed fracture, internal fixation alone was associated with a decreased odds of any SSI after procedures on closed fractures (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.21–0.95), and staged internal fixation after external fixation was associated with an increased odds of any SSI (OR 2.29; 95% CI 1.02–5.16). In the cohort of 1,298 first procedures, higher BMI, internal fixation alone, staged internal fixation after external fixation, and MRSA nasal carriage were significantly associated with S. aureus SSI and with MRSA SSI. The bivariable analyses did not identify statistically significant risk factors for MSSA SSI (data not shown).

Multivariable analysis of risk factors for surgical site infections

After we adjusted for clinically and statistically significant (see Supplemental Materials) variables, MRSA nasal carriage remained associated with SSI in the cohort of 1,298 first procedures. The odds ratios among MRSA carriers were 4.58 (95% CI 1.63–12.88) for any SSI, 10.11 (95% CI 3.25–31.42) for any S. aureus SSI, and 27.25 (95% CI 5.33–139.24) for MRSA SSI.

Wound healing complications

We identified 47 wound healing complications (Supplemental Table 2) after the 1,298 first procedures, for an overall rate of 3.62%. Thirty-four (72.3%) wound healing complications met the NHSN SSI definition and 19 (40.43%) met the NHSN definition of S. aureus SSIs (9 MSSA, 9 MRSA, and 1 MSSA and MRSA). Thirty of 34 (72.34%) Clavien-Dindo grade 3b (required operative procedures under general anesthesia) wound healing complications and 2 of 4 (50%) Clavien-Dindo grade 2 (required pharmacological treatment including antibiotics) wound healing complications met the NHSN SSI definition. The overall rates of S. aureus, MSSA, and MRSA wound healing complications were 1.46%, 0.77%, and 0.77%, respectively. Among the 13 patients with wound healing complications who did not meet the NHSN SSI definition, 12 received antibiotics, 3 had cellulitis, 3 had pin site infections, and 3 had erythema around their surgical wounds.

Discussion

This investigation is one of the largest cohort studies assessing the incidence of S. aureus carriage among patients undergoing operative fixation of acute pelvis or extremity fractures. The 20.18% MSSA carriage rate among screened patients was similar to that in other surgical (20.2%–30%)Reference Morris, Unger, Archer, Mathis, Perdue and Obremskey1,Reference Chen, Heyl, Xu, Rao and Klatt9,Reference Donker, van der Laan, Hendriks and Kluytmans21Reference Skramm, Fossum Moen, Aroen and Bukholm24 and non-surgical populations.Reference Gorwitz, Kruszon-Moran and McAllister25,Reference Hanson, Kates and O’Malley26 The 4.70% MRSA carriage rate was somewhat higher than that among patients undergoing elective orthopedic operations (2.6%)Reference Yano, Minoda and Sakawa27 and those undergoing operations for orthopedic trauma at similar facilities (3%-3.9%).Reference Shaw, Whalen and Mitchell11,Reference Saveli, Morgan and Belknap22 Shaw et al. found that the MRSA carriage rate varied from 1.4% among patients with acute orthopedic trauma, to 12.5% among those with non-acute trauma (P = .01).Reference Shaw, Whalen and Mitchell11 The results of our study and those by Shaw,Reference Shaw, Whalen and Mitchell11 Saveli (3%),Reference Saveli, Morgan and Belknap22 and Shukla (3.2%)Reference Shukla, Nixon, Acharya, Korim and Pandey13 suggest that the MRSA carriage rate among patients with orthopedic trauma is higher than that estimated for the general US population (1.5%).Reference Shukla, Nixon, Acharya, Korim and Pandey13,Reference Saveli, Morgan and Belknap22,Reference Gorwitz, Kruszon-Moran and McAllister25

We obtained similar results with CDC’s NHSN SSI definitionsReference Mangram, Horan, Pearson, Silver and Jarvis18,19 and the Clavien-Dindo classification.Reference Goitein, Raziel, Szold and Sakran20 Rates of SSI and wound healing complications caused by MSSA and MRSA were nearly identical; the Clavien-Dindo classification identified 1 additional MRSA-associated wound healing complication. In addition, most patients with wound healing complications that did not meet NHSN SSI definitions were treated with antimicrobial agents.

S. aureus was the most common organism causing SSI in our study population. S. aureus (1.39%), MSSA (.77%), and MRSA SSI (.69%) rates were similar to rates reported in literature.Reference Torbert, Joshi and Moraff2,Reference Urias, Varghese, Simunich, Morrissey and Dumire12 However, other investigators have reported MRSA SSI rates after fracture fixation surgery as high as 32%–46.5% among patients with complex injuries.Reference Morris, Unger, Archer, Mathis, Perdue and Obremskey1,Reference Torbert, Joshi and Moraff2 In addition to differences in injury severity and type, differences in the patient populations and the studies’ SSI definitions may help account for variation in the rates of SSI caused by MRSA.Reference Morris, Unger, Archer, Mathis, Perdue and Obremskey1,Reference Torbert, Joshi and Moraff2

We found that MRSA colonization was associated with any SSI, S. aureus SSI, and MRSA SSI after operative fracture fixation. Other investigators also have found an association between MRSA colonization and MRSA SSI.Reference Shukla, Nixon, Acharya, Korim and Pandey13,Reference Saveli, Morgan and Belknap22 For example, Shukla et al. found that patients colonized with MRSA were 2.5 times more likely to acquire S. aureus SSI than were non-colonized patients.Reference Shukla, Nixon, Acharya, Korim and Pandey13 Stevens et al. found that MRSA carriers were significantly more likely to acquire skin infections than were MSSA carriers.Reference Stevens, Hennessy, Baggett, Bruden, Parks and Klejka28 A systematic review of 10 observational studies found that MRSA colonization was associated with a 4-fold increase in the risk of infection compared with MSSA colonization.Reference Safdar and Bradley29 However, the authors noted that the reason for this difference has not been elucidated.

None of the injury severity indicators we evaluated were associated with a statistically significant increased risk of any SSI. Of the surgical variables evaluated, only staged external fixation followed by internal fixation was associated with any SSI, S. aureus SSI, and MRSA SSI. The increased incidence of SSI in patients undergoing staged internal fixation may be explained by selection bias. Orthopedic trauma surgeons are more likely to perform external fixation followed by delayed internal fixation for injuries with greater skeletal and soft tissue injury, though increased injury severity as assessed by the ISS was not associated with SSI. This finding indicates that we should further investigate the effect of delayed internal fracture fixation on SSI risk.

After we controlled for multiple patient variables, MRSA carriage was the only modifiable risk factor associated with SSI in our cohort. In 2009, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Patient Safety Committee stated that orthopedic surgeons should consider preoperative screening for MRSA carriage in patients treated with implants.Reference Evans30 Despite the available data and recommendations, two surveys have shown that practice varies substantially.Reference Diekema, Johannsson and Herwaldt31,Reference Kline, Highness, Herwaldt and Perl32 Even though S. aureus is an important cause of SSI among patients with orthopedic trauma, screening, and decolonization programs are uncommon and logistically difficult in this patient population.

Our S. aureus decolonization protocol was similar to those used before elective orthopedic surgery.Reference Schweizer, Perencevich and McDanel7 We screened about 80% of our patients, which is slightly higher than the 71% Shaw et al. achieved.Reference Shaw, Whalen and Mitchell11 Although roughly 90% of known S. aureus carriers had chlorhexidine baths documented, only about 45% had at least 1 dose of intranasal mupirocin documented. In comparison, 55.2% of known S. aureus carriers in our previous study of patients undergoing cardiac operations or total joint replacement had at least three doses of intranasal mupirocin and 85.5% bathed with chlorhexidine.Reference Schweizer, Chiang and Septimus33 In addition, many S. aureus carriers in our study did not receive the recommended perioperative prophylaxis.

Previous studies have shown that S. aureus carriage increases the risk of SSI among patients with orthopedic trauma.Reference Shukla, Nixon, Acharya, Korim and Pandey13,Reference Saveli, Morgan and Belknap22 Our study provides preliminary evidence that MRSA carriage may increase the risk of MRSA SSI after operative fracture fixation. Our prior study demonstrated that treatment of S. aureus carriers significantly reduced the incidence of S. aureus SSI among patients undergoing cardiac operations or total knee and hip arthroplasty.Reference Schweizer, Chiang and Septimus33 Fewer than 5% of patients in that trial who underwent urgent or emergent procedures used mupirocin and chlorhexidine, which highlights the challenges of decolonizing S. aureus carriers before unplanned operations.Reference Schweizer, Chiang and Septimus33 Our current study demonstrated that screening patients with orthopedic trauma for S. aureus nasal carriage was feasible but also found that the full 5-day intranasal mupirocin decolonization protocol could not be completed before surgery given the limited time between the injuries and surgical procedures. Given the difficulty of implementing the full mupirocin decolonization protocol and the potentially serious consequences of S. aureus SSI after operative fixation procedures, patients could benefit from a simpler decolonization protocol. For example, quasi-experimental studies of cleansing patients’ skin with chlorhexidine before their operations and treating all patients with intranasal povidone iodine decreased the rate of all SSIs among patient undergoing elective orthopedic hardware implantation.Reference Bebko, Green and Awad10,Reference Rezapoor, Nicholson, Tabatabaee, Chen, Maltenfort and Parvizi34 A single-center retrospective study among patients undergoing orthopedic trauma operations found that the overall S. aureus SSI rate decreased from 1.1% (2 MSSA SSI; 8 MRSA SSI) in the pre-intervention group to 0.2% (2 MSSA SSI) in the povidone-iodine treated group.Reference Urias, Varghese, Simunich, Morrissey and Dumire12 Maslow et al. found that patients who used intranasal povidone iodine had fewer side effects than those who used intranasal mupirocin.Reference Maslow, Hutzler, Cuff, Rosenberg, Phillips and Bosco35 Povidone iodine can be applied as a single dose immediately before the procedure, and it has not caused resistance. Thus povidone-iodine use would eliminate noncompliance and the need to screen patients, the two major barriers to implementation of the intranasal mupirocin protocol.

Limitations

We were unable to screen about 20% of eligible patients, which may have decreased the power to find an association between S. aureus carriage and SSI. In addition, we screened patients’ nares, but we did not screen other sites for S. aureus.Reference Hanson, Kates and O’Malley26,Reference Andrews, Fleener, Messer, Kroeger and Diekema36 Thus, we may have misclassified patients who were colonized with S. aureus at extra-nasal sites as non-colonized. Despite including nearly 1,300 procedures, the confidence interval was very large for the association of MRSA carriage with MRSA SSI and the power was not adequate to assess whether decolonization decreased S. aureus SSI.

Conclusion

S. aureus was the most common cause of SSI among patients with orthopedic trauma. Although MSSA carriage was over 4 times more common than MRSA carriage, MRSA SSIs were nearly as common as MSSA SSIs. Moreover, MRSA nasal colonization was the only modifiable risk factor associated with MRSA SSI. Given the consequences of SSI in patients who undergo operative fixation of fractures, patient outcomes could be improved with a simple, rapid, and effective S. aureus decolonization protocol that can be completed in the limited time before surgical fixation. We need prospective studies to better evaluate the effectiveness of rapid decolonization protocols with agents such as povidone iodine.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2024.233

Acknowledgments

This research was funded in part by grant #R49 CE002108-05 from the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control/CDC.

Competing interests

This research was funded in part by grant #R49 CE002108-05 from the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control/CDC. Drs. Compton, Uhlenhopp, and Haleem, Ms. Ahmann, Ms. Pottinger, and Ms. Ward have no disclosures. In addition, to the CDC grant listed above, Dr. Herwaldt has additional unrelated funding from CDC and she recently had unrelated funding from AHRQ. Dr. Willey has had unrelated research funding from: the Arthritis Foundation, the Mid-America Orthopaedic Association (Resident Research Grant), the Department of Defense (OP210038), the Orthopaedic Trauma Association, Walmart Children’s Miracle Network Fund, Excere Medical LLC, Naitive Technologies Limited, and Mend Clinical Trial. Dr. Schweizer has had unrelated research grants from: the VA Health Services Research and Development, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and NIH NCATS.

References

Morris, BJ, Unger, RZ, Archer, KR, Mathis, SL, Perdue, AM, Obremskey, WT. Risk factors of infection after ORIF of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2013;27:e196200. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318284704e CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Torbert, JT, Joshi, M, Moraff, A, et al. Current bacterial speciation and antibiotic resistance in deep infections after operative fixation of fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2015;29:717. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000158 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patel, KH, Gill, LI, Tissingh, EK, et al. Microbiological profile of fracture related infection at a UK major trauma centre. Antibiotics (Basel) 2023;12:1358.doi:10.3390/antibiotics12091358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montalvo, RN, Natoli, RM, O’Hara, NN, et al. Variations in the organisms causing deep surgical site infections in fracture patients at a level I trauma center (2006-2015). J Orthop Trauma 2018;32:e475e481. doi: 10.1097/bot.0000000000001305 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalmeijer, MD, van Nieuwland-Bollen, E, Bogaers-Hofman, D, de Baere, GA. Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus is a major risk factor for surgical-site infections in orthopedic surgery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000;21:319323. doi: 10.1086/501763 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baratz, MD, Hallmark, R, Odum, SM, Springer, BD. Twenty percent of patients may remain colonized with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus despite a decolonization protocol in patients undergoing elective total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015;473:22832290. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4191-3 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schweizer, M, Perencevich, E, McDanel, J, et al. Effectiveness of a bundled intervention of decolonization and prophylaxis to decrease gram positive surgical site infections after cardiac or orthopedic surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2013;346:f2743. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f2743 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sousa, RJ, Barreira, PM, Leite, PT, Santos, AC, Ramos, MH, Oliveira, AF. Preoperative Staphylococcus aureus screening/decolonization protocol before total joint arthroplasty-results of a small prospective randomized trial. J Arthroplasty 2016;31:234239. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.08.003 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, AF, Heyl, AE, Xu, PZ, Rao, N, Klatt, BA. Preoperative decolonization effective at reducing staphylococcal colonization in total joint arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty 2013;28:1820. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.03.036 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bebko, SP, Green, DM, Awad, SS. Effect of a preoperative decontamination protocol on surgical site infections in patients undergoing elective orthopedic surgery with hardware implantation. JAMA Surg 2015;150:390395. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.3480 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaw, JT, Whalen, CJ, Mitchell, Jt, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus carrier rate in orthopaedic trauma patients: a prospective cohort study. J Orthop Trauma 2020;34:17. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001630 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Urias, DS, Varghese, M, Simunich, T, Morrissey, S, Dumire, R. Preoperative decolonization to reduce infections in urgent lower extremity repairs. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2018;44:787793. doi: 10.1007/s00068-017-0896-1 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shukla, S, Nixon, M, Acharya, M, Korim, MT, Pandey, R. Incidence of MRSA surgical-site infection in MRSA carriers in an orthopaedic trauma unit. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009;91:225228. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B2.21715 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patel, PA, Schora, DM, Peterson, KE, Grayes, A, Boehm, S, Peterson, LR. Performance of the Cepheid Xpert® SA Nasal complete PCR assay compared to culture for detection of methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2014;80:3234. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.05.019 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bratzler, DW, Dellinger, EP, Olsen, KM, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Am J Health-Syst Pharm AJHP : Official J Am Soc Health-Syst Pharm 2013;70:195283. doi: 10.2146/ajhp120568 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, SP, O’Neill, B, Haddon, W Jr, Long, WB. The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma 1974;14:187196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gustilo, RB, Anderson, JT. Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: retrospective and prospective analyses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976;58:453458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mangram, AJ, Horan, TC, Pearson, ML, Silver, LC, Jarvis, WR. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Centers for disease control and prevention (CDC) hospital infection control practices advisory committee. Am J Infect Control 1999;27:97132; quiz 133-4; discussion 96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Healthcare Safety Network. Patient Safety Component Manual. Accessed October 30, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/pscmanual/pcsmanual_current.pdf Google Scholar
Goitein, D, Raziel, A, Szold, A, Sakran, N. Assessment of perioperative complications following primary bariatric surgery according to the Clavien-Dindo classification: comparison of sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 2016;30:273278. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4205-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donker, JM, van der Laan, L, Hendriks, YJ, Kluytmans, JA. Evaluation of Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage screening before vascular surgery. PloS one 2012;7:e38127. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038127 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saveli, CC, Morgan, SJ, Belknap, RW, et al. Prophylactic antibiotics in open fractures: a pilot randomized clinical safety study. J Orthop Trauma 2013;27:552557. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31828d92ee CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berthelot, P, Grattard, F, Cazorla, C, et al. Is nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus the main acquisition pathway for surgical-site infection in orthopaedic surgery? Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis: Official Pub Eur Soc Clin Microbiol 2010;29:373382. doi: 10.1007/s10096-009-0867-5 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skramm, I, Fossum Moen, AE, Aroen, A, Bukholm, G. Surgical site infections in orthopaedic surgery demonstrate clones similar to those in orthopaedic Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriers. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014;96:882888. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.m.00919 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gorwitz, RJ, Kruszon-Moran, D, McAllister, SK, et al. Changes in the prevalence of nasal colonization with Staphylococcus aureus in the United States, 2001-2004. J Infect Dis 2008;197:12261234. doi: 10.1086/533494 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanson, BM, Kates, AE, O’Malley, SM, et al. Staphylococcus aureus in the nose and throat of Iowan families. Epidemiol Infect 2018;146:17771784. doi: 10.1017/s0950268818001644 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yano, K, Minoda, Y, Sakawa, A, et al. Positive nasal culture of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a risk factor for surgical site infection in orthopedics. Acta Orthopaedica 2009;80:486490. doi: 10.3109/17453670903110675 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevens, AM, Hennessy, T, Baggett, HC, Bruden, D, Parks, D, Klejka, J. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage and risk factors for skin infections, Southwestern Alaska, USA. Emerg Infect Dis 2010;16:797803. doi: 10.3201/eid1605.091851 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Safdar, N, Bradley, EA. The risk of infection after nasal colonization with Staphylococcus aureus. Am J Med 2008;121:310315. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2007.07.034 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, RP. Surgical site infection prevention and control: an emerging paradigm. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 6:29. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.I.00549 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diekema, D, Johannsson, B, Herwaldt, L, et al. Current practice in Staphylococcus aureus screening and decolonization. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32:10421044. doi: 10.1086/661917 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kline, S, Highness, M, Herwaldt, LA, Perl, TM. Variable screening and decolonization protocols for Staphylococcus aureus carriage prior to surgical procedures. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014;35:880882. doi: 10.1086/676866 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schweizer, ML, Chiang, HY, Septimus, E, et al. Association of a bundled intervention with surgical site infections among patients undergoing cardiac, hip, or knee surgery. JAMA 2015;313:21622171. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.5387 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rezapoor, M, Nicholson, T, Tabatabaee, RM, Chen, AF, Maltenfort, MG, Parvizi, J. Povidone-iodine-based solutions for decolonization of nasal Staphylococcus aureus: a randomized, prospective, placebo-controlled study. J Arthroplasty 2017;32:28152819. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.04.039 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maslow, J, Hutzler, L, Cuff, G, Rosenberg, A, Phillips, M, Bosco, J. Patient experience with mupirocin or povidone-iodine nasal decolonization. Orthopedics 2014;37:e576–81. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20140528-59 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrews, JI, Fleener, DK, Messer, SA, Kroeger, JS, Diekema, DJ. Screening for Staphylococcus aureus carriage in pregnancy: usefulness of novel sampling and culture strategies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;201:396.e1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.06.062 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Bivariable analyses of factors associated with Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage

Figure 1

Table 2. Bivariable analyses to identify variables associated with surgical site infections as defined by the National Healthcare Safety Network

Figure 2

Figure 1. Study Population. Note. SA, Staphylococcus aureus; MSSA, methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus; MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; SSI, surgical site infection.*Eighteen procedures had S. aureus surgical site infections. The figure includes 1 screened procedure twice because the patient was infected with both MRSA and MSSA.

Supplementary material: File

Ahmann et al. supplementary material

Ahmann et al. supplementary material
Download Ahmann et al. supplementary material(File)
File 29.4 KB