Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T09:16:34.928Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How not to answer interdisciplinary “Why?” questions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2021

Fred L. Bookstein Open the ORCID record for Fred L. Bookstein [Opens in a new window]
Fred L. Bookstein*
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA98195, USA. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The book under review tries to link the economic concept of “reward,” or, more accurately, “capture rate,” to the experimental literature of various neuroscientific quantities dealing with motor control. But this reviewer argues that such a linkage requires a richer language of quantification than the book actually affords: a language not just of “greater” or “less,” but of how much greater or less. Without such a methodology, the arguments here cannot be persuasive.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 44 , 2021 , e125
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atwater, B. F., Musumi-Rokkaku, S., Satake, K., Tsuji, Y., Ueba, K., & Yamaguchi, D. K. (2005). The Orphan Tsunami of 1700: Japanese clues to a parent earthquake in North America. United States Geological Survey and University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Bookstein, F. L. (2014). Measuring and reasoning: Numerical inference in the sciences. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hackshaw, A. K., Law, M. R., & Law, N. J. (1997). The accumulated evidence on lung cancer and environmental tobacco smoke. British Medical Journal, 315, 980–988.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Higgins, J. P. T., & Green, S., eds. (2008). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, M. R., Morris, J. K., & Wald, N. J. (1997). Environmental tobacco smoke exposure and ischaemic heart disease: an evaluation of the evidence. British Medical Journal, 315, 973–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearl, J. (2009). Causality: Reasoning, models, and inference (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platt, J. R. (1964). Strong inference. Science, 146, 347–353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, E. O. (1998). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. Knopf.Google Scholar
Wold, H., & Jöreskog, K. eds. (1982). Systems under indirect observation: Causality, structure, prediction (Vol. 2). North-Holland.Google Scholar