Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T05:44:10.173Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The paradoxical effect of climate on time perspective considering resource accumulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2017

Gábor Orosz
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychology, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, [email protected]@[email protected]://www.researchgate.net/profile/Orosz_Gaborhttps://www.researchgate.net/profile/Beata_Bothehttps://www.researchgate.net/profile/Istvan_Toth-Kiraly Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary
Philip G. Zimbardo
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, [email protected]://psychology.stanford.edu/zimbardo
Beáta Boőthe
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychology, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, [email protected]@[email protected]://www.researchgate.net/profile/Orosz_Gaborhttps://www.researchgate.net/profile/Beata_Bothehttps://www.researchgate.net/profile/Istvan_Toth-Kiraly Doctoral School of Psychology, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
István Tóth-Király
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychology, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, [email protected]@[email protected]://www.researchgate.net/profile/Orosz_Gaborhttps://www.researchgate.net/profile/Beata_Bothehttps://www.researchgate.net/profile/Istvan_Toth-Kiraly Doctoral School of Psychology, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.

Abstract

Considering purely climate, southern countries are less harsh and more predictable than northern countries. From a historical perspective, freezing winters resulting in fewer available resources contribute to the development of strong future orientation. The paradox is that future orientation contributes to accumulation of resources in the long run, making individuals' immediate living conditions less harsh, leading to slower life strategies.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashkanasy, N., Gupta, V., Mayfield, M. S. & Trevor-Roberts, E. (2004) Future orientation. In: Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies, ed. House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W. & Gupta, V., pp. 282342. Sage.Google Scholar
Chen, P. & Vazsonyi, A. T. (2011) Future orientation, impulsivity, and problem behaviors: A longitudinal moderation model. Developmental Psychology 47:1633–45. doi: 10.1037/a0025327.Google Scholar
Ellis, B. J., Figueredo, A. J., Brumbach, B. H. & Schlomer, G. L. (2009) Fundamental dimensions of environmental risk: The impact of harsh versus unpredictable environments on the evolution and development of life history strategies. Human Nature 20(2):204–68. doi: 10.1007/s12110-009-9063-7.Google Scholar
Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Delton, A. W. & Robertson, T. E. (2011) The influence of mortality and socioeconomic status on risk and delayed rewards: A life history theory approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 100:1015–26. doi: 10.1037/a0022403.Google Scholar
Hill, K. (1993) Life history theory and evolutionary anthropology. Evolutionary Anthropology 2:7888. doi: 10.1002/evan.1360020303.Google Scholar
Kaplan, H. S. & Gangestad, S. W. (2005) Life History Theory and evolutionary psychology. In: Handbook of evolutionary psychology, ed. Buss, D. M., pp. 6895. Wiley.Google Scholar
Morselli, D. (2013) The olive tree effect: Future time perspective when the future is uncertain. Culture & Psychology 19(3):305–22. doi: 10.1177/1354067X13489319.Google Scholar
Zimbardo, P. G. & Boyd, J. (2008) The time paradox: The new psychology of time that will change your life. Free Press.Google Scholar