Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-nqxm9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-15T14:32:17.549Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Accepted manuscript

Evaluation of Water Hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) Response to Herbicides Using Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Imagery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2025

Amber E. Riner*
Affiliation:
Graduate Research Assistant, Center for Aquatic and Invasive Plants, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL USA
Jonathan S. Glueckert
Affiliation:
Biological Scientist, Center for Aquatic and Invasive Plants, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL USA
Corrina J. Vuillequez
Affiliation:
Graduate Research Assistant, Center for Aquatic and Invasive Plants, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL USA
James K. Leary
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Center for Aquatic and Invasive Plants, Gainesville, FL USA
Benjamin P. Sperry
Affiliation:
Research Biologist, US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Gainesville, FL USA
Gregory E. Macdonald
Affiliation:
Professor, Agronomy Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL USA
*
Corresponding author: Amber Riner; 7922 NW 71st Street, Gainesville, FL 32653; [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Water hyacinth is a highly invasive, aquatic species in the southern US that requires intensive management through frequent herbicide applications to minimize harmful impacts. Quantifying management success in large-scale operations is challenging with traditional survey methods, which rely on boat-based teams and can be time-consuming and labor-intensive. In contrast, unmanned aerial systems allow a single operator to survey a waterbody more efficiently and rapidly, enhancing both coverage and data collection. Therefore, the objective of this research was to develop remote sensing techniques to assess herbicide efficacy for water hyacinth control in an outdoor mesocosm study. Experiments were conducted in spring and summer 2023 to compare and correlate data from visual evaluations of herbicide efficacy against nine vegetation indices (VIs) derived from unmanned aerial system (UAS)-based red-green-blue (RGB) imagery. Penoxsulam, carfentrazone, diquat, 2,4-D, florpyrauxifen-benzyl, and glyphosate were applied at two rates, and experimental units were evaluated for six weeks. The Carotenoid Reflectance Index (CRI) had the highest Spearman’s correlation coefficient with visually evaluated efficacy for 2,4-D, diquat, and florpyrauxifen benzyl (> -0.77). The Visible Atmospherically Resistance Index (VARI) had the highest correlation for carfentrazone and penoxsulam treatments (> -0.70), and the EXGR Excess Greenness Minus Redness Index had the highest correlation for glyphosate treatments (> -0.83). CRI had the highest correlation coefficient with the most herbicide treatments, and it was the only VI tested that did not include the red band. These vegetation indices were satisfactory predictors of mid-range visually evaluated herbicide efficacy values but were poorly correlated with extremely low and high values, corresponding to non-treated and necrotic plants. Future research should focus on applying findings to real-world (non-experimental) field conditions and testing imagery with spectral bands beyond the visible range.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Weed Science Society of America